Supreme Court Allows Enforcement of Corporate Transparency Act


The US Supreme Court on Thursday said it will allow the government to implement the Corporate Transparency Act, requiring millions of businesses to file information on their beneficial owners.

The justices stayed the injunction blocking the enforcement of the CTA, which requires US entities to disclose who owns and controls their businesses.

The move paves a path for the government to move ahead with enforcement of the law while its merits are being debated in the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

That court plans oral arguments March 25.

Justice Neil Gorsuch concurred in the decision, saying he would “go a step further and, as the government suggests, take this case now to resolve definitively the question whether a district court may issue universal injunctive relief.”

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, saying she didn’t see a need for intervention because the government hadn’t proven exigency.

“The Government has provided no indication that injury of a more serious or significant nature would result if the Act’s implementation is further delayed while the litigation proceeds in the lower courts,” she wrote.

Under the law, most incorporated business entities that existed before 2024 had until Jan. 13 to file their ownership and control information with the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. FinCEN estimates 32.6 million US businesses will need to disclose beneficial ownership information or face penalties, as will an estimated 5 million new businesses incorporated annually.

Texas Top Cop Shop Inc., a firearm retailer represented by the federalist advocacy nonprofit Center for Individual Rights, has challenged the constitutionality of the law, and its case is one of several working through the courts. Business groups have criricized the law while transparency advocates have cheered it.

Eleventh Hour Zig-Zag

The CTA has sent tax professionals scrambling as its enforcement was halted by a judge in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, then allowed by the Fifth Circuit, then had its filing deadline pushed back, before finally being halted again in the last few days of December.

Judge Amos L. Mazzant III blocked enforcement of the CTA nationwide Dec. 3. That order was lifted Dec. 23 by the motions panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. FinCEN then pushed back the original Jan. 1 deadline for most companies to file. Enforcement was again halted when a different Fifth Circuit panel, looking at the merits of the appeal, reinstated the injunction Dec. 27.

The US Department of Justice asked the Supreme Court to weigh in Dec. 31.

FinCEN said after the injunction was reimposed that beneficial ownership information can still be disclosed on a voluntary basis. If the act is made mandatory, businesses would face $500-a-day fines for knowingly failing to file. As of Dec. 3, about 10 million businesses had submitted beneficial ownership information, according to FinCEN information.

Tom O’Saben, director of tax content and government relations at the National Association of Tax Professionals,told Bloomberg Law the group has advised that businesses should err on the side of caution by filing information. That also staves off any problems with filing that could result if a rush of new filings causes technical issues with FinCEN’s submission process.

SL Law PLLC also represents Texas Top Cop Shop and several other named plaintiffs, including the National Federation of Independent Businesses.

The case is McHenry v. Texas Top Cop Shop Inc., U.S., No. 24A653, application for stay granted 1/23/25.



Today, the Supreme Court made a landmark decision to allow the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act. This Act, which was passed by Congress to combat money laundering and terrorism financing, requires certain companies to disclose their true beneficial owners to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.

This decision is a crucial step towards increasing transparency in corporate ownership and preventing illicit financial activities. By requiring companies to disclose their beneficial owners, law enforcement agencies will be better equipped to track and investigate suspicious financial transactions.

The enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act sends a strong message that the United States is committed to combating financial crimes and protecting the integrity of the financial system. This decision will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications for corporate governance and accountability.

Overall, this decision is a win for transparency, accountability, and the fight against financial crimes. It is a significant victory for those who believe in the importance of a fair and just financial system.

Tags:

  1. Supreme Court ruling on Corporate Transparency Act
  2. Corporate Transparency Act enforcement update
  3. SCOTUS decision on corporate transparency
  4. Impact of Supreme Court ruling on transparency in corporations
  5. Corporate Transparency Act enforcement implications
  6. Supreme Court upholds enforcement of Corporate Transparency Act
  7. Latest news on Corporate Transparency Act enforcement
  8. SCOTUS ruling on corporate transparency regulations
  9. How Supreme Court decision affects corporate transparency
  10. Corporate Transparency Act compliance requirements

#Supreme #Court #Enforcement #Corporate #Transparency #Act

Comments

Leave a Reply