Tag: administration

  • Trump Administration Live Updates: Kristi Noem Confirmed as Homeland Security Secretary


    President Trump’s blunt message after a whirlwind week of executive orders and presidential proclamations may boil down to this: Take me at my word.

    During four years in political exile after his first term, Mr. Trump vowed to radically reshape American life, culture and politics if he got another chance. His first week has demonstrated that he will seek to do just that — and fast — as he races to make good on the promises that vaulted him back into power.

    Not all of his directives will succeed in the end. But already, the United States is a different place than it was a week ago.

    Several efforts to address climate change have been rescinded, and more land opened to oil drilling. The government now recognizes only two “immutable” genders, male and female. Migrants — now referred to as “aliens” — are being turned away at the border, and immigration agents have been freed to target hospitals, schools and churches in search of people to deport.

    Large-scale tariffs have yet to be imposed, but nations around the world are bracing for those that Mr. Trump says will come on Feb. 1. Diversity efforts in the federal government have been dismantled, and employees turned into snitches. Federal money will once again be barred from paying for abortions overseas. Mount Denali once again will be known as Mount McKinley, and the Gulf of Mexico is now the Gulf of America (at least, according to the U.S. government).

    Career officials at agencies across the government have been let go as part of Mr. Trump’s pledge to get rid of what he considers disloyal members of the “deep state.” Security clearances and protection has been stripped from people Mr. Trump considers political enemies. TikTok was given a temporary reprieve from a forced shutdown, even as Mr. Trump rescinded his predecessor’s efforts to establish guardrails around the development of artificial intelligence.

    New regulations and new federal hiring are frozen for now. More than 1,500 people who were convicted of crimes connected to the storming of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, have been pardoned or had their sentences commuted, including those who assaulted police officers.

    Here are some of the biggest policy changes Mr. Trump has made.

    Immigration

    Customs and Border Protection agents checking the documents of migrants who had appointments to cross the border on Monday from Mexico into El Paso.Credit…Paul Ratje for The New York Times

    No single issue received more attention in the first few days from Mr. Trump and his new administration than immigration. The issue has long been at the center of the president’s political identity, and he promised throughout the 2024 campaign to make far-reaching policy changes.

    Mr. Trump issued more than a dozen immigration-related orders that included scores of policy overhauls based on the premise that the United States is being invaded by dangerous immigrants crossing over the border with Mexico. Many of the most aggressive changes — including new powers to deny asylum seekers from entering the country — are aimed at “aliens engaged in the invasion.”

    Mr. Trump quickly eliminated policies that prevented Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers from raiding churches, schools and hospitals.

    He blocked the entry of thousands of refugees who already had been cleared to come to America. And he began the process of expelling a million people President Joseph R. Biden Jr. had allowed in on a temporary but legal basis. And he made good on his longstanding promise to try to scale back birthright citizenship, an order that one federal judge quickly blocked, calling it blatantly unconstitutional.

    The president also directed federal law enforcement officials to investigate and potentially prosecute local officials in cities and states who interfere with the government’s efforts to deport people who are in the country illegally. And he directed agencies to withhold funds from so-called sanctuary cities in which officials refuse to cooperate with federal immigration agents.

    — Hamed Aleaziz

    Climate and Energy

    Mr. Trump initiated a plan to open up large areas of Alaska, including the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, to oil drilling.Credit…Christopher Miller for The New York Times

    Mr. Trump issued a half-dozen executive orders related to energy aimed at expanding the use of fossil fuels, curbing renewable energy and abandoning the federal government’s efforts to address climate change.

    He pulled the United States out of the Paris climate agreement. He shut down several efforts to prepare for the risks of a warming planet. He initiated plans to open larger areas in Alaska to oil drilling. And he ordered a freeze on federal permits for wind farms across the country.

    Many of Mr. Trump’s promises to “unleash” American energy — which he defined as everything except wind and solar power — will take time to have an impact. He ordered agencies to streamline permitting for gas pipelines and mining and to repeal rules that promote electric cars. But there’s a legally required process for redoing federal regulations that can take years and has to pass muster with courts.

    Other actions may end up being largely symbolic. Mr. Trump declared an “energy emergency” and has claimed he has authority to get power plants built quickly, but legal experts say the government’s emergency powers are often fairly limited.

    It remains to be seen how drastically Mr. Trump can reshape the nation’s energy landscape. Many oil and gas companies are not looking to significantly increase output, which is already at record levels, since doing so could lower prices and squeeze profits. But the wind industry, a frequent target of Mr. Trump’s, is bracing for a backlash, and some companies have already delayed or canceled new investments.

    — Brad Plumer

    Tariffs and Trade

    Shipping containers at a port in Qingdao, China.Credit…Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

    Mr. Trump had previously written on social media that he would impose a 25 percent tariff on products from Canada and Mexico and an additional 10 percent tariff on products from China on Day 1 of his administration, accusing those countries of not doing enough to stop flows of drugs and migrants into the United States. Instead, he released an executive order that requested reports on an exhaustive list of trade issues from various agencies by April 1.

    Some business groups expressed relief, but that sentiment was short-lived. On Monday night, Mr. Trump told reporters he planned to put a 25 percent tariff on products from Canada and Mexico beginning on Feb. 1, and on Tuesday night, he said he would also put an additional 10 percent tariff on Chinese products by the same date.

    It remains to be seen if those tariffs actually go into effect. But even if they do not, Mr. Trump will have plenty of opportunities in the coming months to make good on his campaign promises to impose sweeping tariffs on foreign products, including high levies on China and a universal tariff on most imports that could help raise money to offset tax cuts.

    — Ana Swanson

    Gender and Transgender Rights

    Supporters of transgender rights demonstrating in front of the Supreme Court last year.Credit…Maansi Srivastava for The New York Times

    With an executive order billed as protecting women from “gender ideology extremism,” Mr. Trump ordered the government to effectively recognize only two “immutable” sexes — male and female.

    By proclaiming that a person’s sex must be a permanent gender identity, the administration reversed efforts by the Biden administration to accommodate people who are intersex or transgender, among others, and allow them to self-identify as such in interactions with the government. It also rejected the mainstream medical understanding among groups such as the American Medical Association, which recommends viewing gender and sex as falling along a spectrum.

    The order has already prompted administrative changes. The State Department removed the “unspecified or another gender identity” category from passport applications. More broadly, it directs agencies to scrub any mention of nonbinary gender identity from official documents and memos.

    Certain agencies were urged to “protect men and women as biologically distinct sexes,” in part by maintaining single-sex spaces such as prisons and shelters for women, from which transgender women will be denied access under the policy. And the order explicitly rejected the Biden administration’s interpretation of a Supreme Court ruling protecting transgender workers that was the basis for its extending protections to transgender students through Title IX last year.

    — Zach Montague

    Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

    After declaring in his inaugural address that he would usher in a “colorblind” and “merit-based” society, Mr. Trump ordered federal agencies to immediately purge the concepts of diversity, equity and inclusion — or D.E.I. — from the federal government’s policies, programs and practices and targeted civil rights protections for government contractors.

    He rescinded executive orders issued by Mr. Biden that sought to advance equity for women and Black, Hispanic, Asian and Native American people, as well as people with disabilities.

    Mr. Trump then issued an order titled, “Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing,” which halts all work in the federal agencies aimed at reversing systemic racism, sexism and other inequities.

    The order required the shutdown of offices dedicated to D.E.I. work across all government agencies and the immediate dismissal of any employees working on such initiatives; the employees were placed on administrative leave this week and are to be laid off in the next month.

    In an effort to root out any D.E.I. initiatives “in disguise,” federal employees were told to report any colleagues that attempted to circumvent the order to a newly created email address. Those who know of any such activity but do not report it within 10 days would face “adverse consequences,” according to emails that were sent by all agency heads.

    Mr. Trump also revoked a civil rights-era order signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965 that banned discrimination in government contracting. The order was seen as the underpinning of the federal government’s commitment to affirmative action.

    — Erica Green

    Tech and Artificial Intelligence

    Mr. Trump announced his artificial intelligence initiative alongside Sam Altman, right, the leader of OpenAI, and Masayoshi Son, the head of SoftBank.Credit…Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times

    Right after he was sworn into office, Mr. Trump rescinded a 2023 executive order that established guardrails around artificial intelligence. On Thursday, Mr. Trump issued an executive order directing his staff to come up with a plan to pursue policy that would “sustain and enhance America’s global A.I. dominance.”

    The president also issued an executive order to establish a group that would come up with policy proposals related to cryptocurrency, an industry Mr. Trump has personal investments in.

    Mr. Trump intervened in the battle over the future of TikTok. Officials in Washington fear that the immensely popular video app could pose a national security threat. Congress passed a law last year that forces TikTok’s owner ByteDance to sell the app or face a ban from working with app stores and cloud providers. The Supreme Court upheld the law this month.

    The ban took effect on Sunday. But Mr. Trump on Monday told the Justice Department not to enforce the law for 75 days and to instruct companies, like Apple, Google and the cloud computing provider Oracle, that during that period there is “no liability” related to their work to distribute and maintain the app. The app is currently working in the United States but is still unavailable in Apple’s and Google’s app stores.

    — David McCabe

    Health and Medicine

    Health professionals at a rural clinic treating Mpox in Kamituga, Democratic Republic of Congo. The United States’ withdrawal from the World Health Organization would deprive the group of a key funding source for public health programs in other countries.Credit…Moses Sawasawa for The New York Times

    Hours after taking the oath of office, Mr. Trump withdrew the United States from the World Health Organization, a move that he pursued in the last year of his first term, as the coronavirus pandemic raged. On his first day in office four years ago, Mr. Biden blocked the withdrawal from going into effect.

    As he did in 2020, Mr. Trump this week accused the agency of botching its response to the pandemic, and claimed that it asked for “unfairly onerous payments,” with China paying less than the United States.

    The withdrawal means that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, considered the world’s leading infectious disease agency, would not have access to the global data the W.H.O. provides. It also would deprive the W.H.O. of a key funding source that it uses to protect public health programs in other countries, a shortfall that public health experts say could eventually hurt disease-fighting efforts of American health officials during international outbreaks.

    Mr. Trump on his first day in office also rescinded a health order that called on federal agencies to expand access to coverage on the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance marketplaces, and in Medicaid, the joint federal-state insurance program for low-income Americans. Russell T. Vought, Mr. Trump’s nominee to run the White House budget office, told lawmakers this week that he supported the first Trump administration’s strategy of encouraging states to add work requirements to Medicaid.

    Mr. Trump’s health department also asked officials to refrain from public communications, including publishing reports on the bird flu outbreak. Meetings of advisory panels on health issues were also canceled. Trump administration officials defended the move, saying it allowed them to catch up to activity in the department before signing off on new public messaging. But the scope and duration of the pause unnerved career officials and outside scientists.

    — Noah Weiland

    Federal Work Force

    Mr. Trump told federal agencies to require employees to work from their offices full time.Credit…Eric Lee/The New York Times

    The administration issued one executive order that makes it easier to fire federal employees by subjecting them to the rules governing political appointees, who have much weaker due process rights. Mr. Trump also issued a memo asserting his authority to fire several thousand members of the so-called Senior Executive Service, top bureaucrats across the government, and the administration began to remove some of them.

    Other memos told agencies to require employees to return to an office full time “as soon as practicable,” which some federal employees said had prompted them to look for new jobs outside government, and to list employees who are still completing the probationary period required of new hires — typically one or two years, depending on the role or category of employee.

    This memo noted that employees could be terminated during their probationary period “without triggering appeal rights” and suggested that the administration would seek to thin the civil service ranks by eliminating many recent hires. Mr. Trump also initiated a 90-day hiring freeze, causing agencies to rescind job offers for candidates whose starting date was imminent.

    The National Treasury Employees Union, which has about 90,000 active members across dozens of agencies, filed a lawsuit in federal court on Monday challenging the executive order making it easier to fire federal employees. Other unions they were still digesting the slew of orders and memos to understand the precise implications.

    — Noam Scheiber



    In a recent development, South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem has been confirmed as the new Secretary of Homeland Security in the Trump Administration. Noem, a staunch supporter of President Trump, brings a wealth of experience in governance and security to the role.

    Stay tuned for live updates on Secretary Noem’s plans and initiatives for the Department of Homeland Security. #KristiNoem #HomelandSecurity #TrumpAdministration

    Tags:

    Trump Administration, live updates, Kristi Noem, Homeland Security Secretary, confirmed, government news, political updates, Trump administration updates, Department of Homeland Security, Noem confirmation, current events

    #Trump #Administration #Live #Updates #Kristi #Noem #Confirmed #Homeland #Security #Secretary

  • Trump orders administration to evaluate potential for ‘national digital asset stockpile’


    President Donald Trump announced Thursday that his administration will evaluate whether to create a “national digital asset stockpile” — making good on a promise to support the use of cryptocurrencies like bitcoin.

    However, his executive order fell short of creating a strategic bitcoin reserve outright, as some crypto advocates had hoped.

    The price of bitcoin briefly surged on the news, but fell back to daily lows as traders took stock of the move.

    The idea of a strategic reserve of digital tokens like bitcoin has long been floated in cryptocurrency circles, but gained traction this summer, when both Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump’s nominee for Health and Human Services Secretary, discussed it at the annual Bitcoin conference.

    Trump reaffirmed his intention to create a reserve in a CNBC interview in December, stating it was incumbent upon the United States to be a leader in cryptocurrency technology, especially relative to China.

    Advocates have called for the creation of a reserve on the grounds that bitcoin is the new “digital gold.” Just as the United States holds gold reserves, crypto advocates say, it should own bitcoin, as well.

    “I think the world is moving to a bitcoin standard for money,” Brian Armstrong, the CEO of the crypto group Coinbase, said this week at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, according to Yahoo News. “Any government who holds gold should also hold bitcoin as a reserve.”

    Hours before Trump’s order on Thursday, Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., a longtime bitcoin advocate, released a statement upon her appointment as chair of the Senate Banking Subcommittee on Digital Assets calling for the creation of a strategic bitcoin reserve, which she said would “strengthen the U.S. dollar” and maintain the United States’ status as a financial innovator.

    During his presidential campaign, Trump heavily courted the crypto community, which eventually became his largest donor group.

    Along the way, he promised to make the United States “the crypto capital of the world,” and on the campaign trail said he would undo Biden-era restrictions and constraints on crypto activity.

    Just before Trump took office, questions arose about the extent to which he intended to directly benefit from pro-crypto measures. Last Friday, he launched his own digital token, $TRUMP. Although the token has no intrinsic value as a “memecoin,” its price was rapidly bid up as investors quickly viewed it as a means for tracking the success of the Trump administration. Yet less than 48 hours later, first lady Melania Trump issued her own coin, causing a substantial number of people in the cryptocurrency community, including previous Trump supporters, to criticize the launches as a means of personally benefiting from their positions.

    When it comes to conflicts of interest, Trump is in largely unchartered territory. It is not clear if he owns any bitcoin directly — though Vice President JD Vance owned $250,000 to $500,000 worth, according to disclosure forms. Trump voluntarily released an ethics document just before taking office that said he would limit his involvement in the Trump Organization while in office.

    Also in Thursday’s order, Trump reversed a Biden administration directive to research a U.S. digital currency, often called a central bank digital currency, or CBDC. Such currencies been adopted and researched by some governments around the world, but they have also been viewed with scrutiny and skepticism by some who cite privacy and surveillance concerns.

    Trump’s order, which said CBDCs “threaten the stability of the financial system, individual privacy, and the sovereignty of the United States,” prohibits the establishing, issuing or circulating a CBDC in the United States.

    This article was originally published on NBCNews.com



    In a surprising move, President Trump has ordered his administration to begin evaluating the potential for creating a ‘national digital asset stockpile’. The concept, which has never been proposed before, would involve the government stockpiling digital assets such as cryptocurrency, digital currency, and other virtual assets.

    The idea behind the creation of a national digital asset stockpile is to ensure that the United States has a strategic reserve of digital assets that can be utilized in times of crisis. This could involve using digital assets to stabilize the economy, fund emergency relief efforts, or even defend against cyber attacks.

    While the concept is still in the early stages of development, it has already sparked a debate among experts and lawmakers. Some argue that a national digital asset stockpile could provide a much-needed safety net in an increasingly digital world, while others warn of the potential risks and challenges associated with such a large-scale government intervention in the digital asset market.

    It remains to be seen how the administration will proceed with this ambitious proposal, but one thing is clear: the idea of a national digital asset stockpile has the potential to reshape the way we think about digital assets and their role in our economy. Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    1. Trump administration
    2. National digital asset stockpile
    3. Digital assets evaluation
    4. Government digital strategy
    5. National security measures
    6. Cybersecurity initiatives
    7. Data protection policies
    8. Technology assessment
    9. Government digital assets
    10. Presidential directive

    #Trump #orders #administration #evaluate #potential #national #digital #asset #stockpile

  • Trump administration weighs sending 10,000 troops to border, using bases to hold migrants


    Washington — Trump administration officials are considering deploying as many as 10,000 soldiers to the U.S.-Mexico border and using Department of Defense bases to hold migrants awaiting deportation as they plan their dramatic crackdown on illegal immigration, according to an internal government memo obtained by CBS News.

    In an executive action Mr. Trump signed upon taking office on Monday, he declared a national emergency along the southern border and ordered the Defense Department to provide troops and resources “to support the activities of the Secretary of Homeland Security in obtaining complete operational control” of the border. He also instructed the military to help build border barriers to repel migrants.

    On Wednesday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that the president had signed another executive order to deploy 1,500 troops to the southern border, where 2,500 soldiers are already stationed under federal orders. Texas and other states have also deployed National Guard soldiers to the border in recent years, including to fortify it with razor wire.

    But the internal Customs and Border Protection memo dated Jan. 21 indicates there’s a plan to dispatch “~10,000 soldiers” to help the agency’s mission at the southern border. The Trump administration, according to the document, has submitted an “[u]nrestrained request” for the Pentagon to surge resources and personnel to assist CBP with technology and infrastructure. 

    The memo also says the Defense Department “may” convert its bases into “holding facilities,” presumably to help CBP detain migrants who crossed into the U.S. illegally.

    Additionally, the memo shows the Trump administration is planning to dramatically expand detention capacity at Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which is expected to be at the center of Mr. Trump’s promised mass deportations.

    According to the document, ICE officials want 14 new detention facilities with the capacity to hold up to 1,000 migrants each and another four able to accommodate as many as 10,000 immigrant detainees each.

    During a briefing with reporters, a senior U.S. military official said the 1,500-troop deployment would involve dispatching 1,000 Army personnel and 500 Marines, as well as helicopters, to the California and Texas border. The official said the troops would not engage in law enforcement, as federal law generally prohibits the use of the military for civilian law enforcement. Instead, the official said they would be tasked with helping CBP and erecting border barriers, to curtail illegal crossings.

    The Department of Defense also announced it would “provide military airlift to support” deportation flights for more than 5,000 migrants detained along the U.S.-Mexico border by CBP. Officials said the Department of Homeland Security would offer in-flight law enforcement. 

    Mr. Trump’s plans to greatly expand the role of the U.S. military in border enforcement — historically limited to operational and administrative duties — is part of a larger campaign to seal U.S. borders to migrants and asylum-seekers.

    The Trump administration has also directed U.S. immigration agents along the borders with Mexico and Canada to swiftly and summarily deport migrants crossing into the country illegally, denying them the opportunity to request asylum, according to CBP officials and internal documents.

    Those directions are being implemented in accordance with an unprecedented order issued by Mr. Trump that suspended the entry of unauthorized migrants into the country, based on the argument they are “invading” the U.S. and threatening public health and national security. 

    Mr. Trump said he was allowed to take the drastic step through powers in the U.S. Constitution and a law known as 212(f) that empowers presidents to bar the entry of foreigners whose arrival is deemed to be “detrimental” to U.S. interests.

    While Mr. Trump made immigration a top issue in the campaign, his administration inherited a relatively calm southern border, with illegal crossings there at a four-year low. Unlawful crossings into the U.S. plunged in 2024 from the record highs in the previous three years due to a Mexican crackdown on migrants. They fell further after the Biden administration enacted restrictions on asylum last June.

    contributed to this report.



    The Trump administration is considering deploying up to 10,000 troops to the border in an effort to address the influx of migrants seeking asylum in the United States. The proposal includes using military bases to hold migrants while their asylum claims are processed.

    This controversial move has sparked debate among lawmakers and immigration advocates, with some expressing concerns about the militarization of the border and the treatment of migrants. Critics argue that using military bases to detain migrants could violate their rights and lead to overcrowding and poor living conditions.

    Supporters of the plan argue that the deployment of troops is necessary to secure the border and prevent illegal immigration. They believe that utilizing military bases to hold migrants will help alleviate the strain on existing detention facilities and improve the efficiency of processing asylum claims.

    As the Trump administration weighs this decision, the debate over immigration policy continues to divide the nation. Stay tuned for updates on this developing situation.

    Tags:

    1. Trump administration
    2. 10,000 troops
    3. Border security
    4. Migrant crisis
    5. Military bases
    6. Immigration policy
    7. National security
    8. Border control
    9. Troop deployment
    10. Immigration enforcement

    #Trump #administration #weighs #sending #troops #border #bases #hold #migrants

  • Trump gives Ice power to deport immigrants who came legally under Biden | Trump administration


    The Trump administration is issuing a new round of heavy-handed measures that could rapidly deport immigrants who entered the United States through recently established legal pathways, according to an internal Department of Homeland Security memo obtained the New York Times.

    The directive, signed by the acting homeland security secretary, Benjamine Huffman, grants Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) officials unprecedented authority to expedite deportations for immigrants who entered the country with government authorization through two key Biden-era programs.

    These programs, which have allowed more than a million immigrants to enter the country since 2023, had provided scheduling for migrants or asylum seekers through the government-run app CBP One or temporary legal status for up to two years through a parole program for certain countries.

    The newly reported memo instructs Ice officials to identify and potentially rapidly deport immigrants who have been in the country for over a year and have not yet applied for asylum, in effect sidestepping traditional immigration court proceedings.

    In no waste of time, Trump’s press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, posted on X on Friday: “Deportation flights have begun,” accompanied by official pictures of people boarding a military-style aircraft.

    Despite such flights being routine under successive administrations, the White House is promoting such images strongly and also deployed troops to the border late on Thursday, including US marines arriving in Boeing Osprey aircraft in California.

    The developments come as so-called sanctuary cities like Chicago, Newark and Denver are experiencing direct impacts of the administration’s hardline immigration stance. In Newark, Mayor Ras Baraka condemned a small-scale local Ice raid on Thursday that he claimed resulted in the detention of both undocumented residents and citizens – including a US military veteran.

    And Denver’s mayor, Mike Johnston, told CNN the city would cooperate with Ice to deport “violent criminals”, but pushed back against arrests in schools and churches.

    A DHS spokesperson defended the new policies, writing in a statement that “Criminals will no longer be able to hide in America’s schools and churches to avoid arrest,” and that the administration “trusts law enforcement to use common sense”.

    The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has already challenged the policy in federal court, with the senior staff attorney Anand Balakrishnan characterizing the approach as a “mass deportation agenda” that circumvents constitutional due process.

    Stephen Miller, a key architect of Trump’s hardline immigration policies, has been vocal in his opposition to the immigration programs of the last administration, previously criticizing the admission of immigrants from what he termed “failed states”.

    Thousands who had received or were waiting for CBP One appointments south of the border were left devastated this week after the app was abruptly shut down moments after Trump was sworn in, while those already in the country using the app and who were preparing to apply for asylum may now be in the line of fire.

    Later on Friday, the Trump administration followed up, announcing that it was expanding a fast-track deportation authority nationwide, allowing immigration officers to deport people without appearing before a judge.

    skip past newsletter promotion

    The administration said it was expanding the use of “expedited removal” authority so it can be used across the country, in a notice in the Federal Register outlining the new rules.

    “Expedited removal” gives enforcement agencies broad authority to deport people without requiring them to appear before an immigration judge. There are limited exceptions, including if they express fear of returning home and pass an initial screening interview for asylum.

    Critics have said there is too much risk that people who have the right to be in the country will be mistakenly swept up by agents and officers and that not enough is done to protect immigrants who have genuine reason to fear being sent home.

    The powers were created under a 1996 law. But these powers were not widely used until 2004, when homeland security said it would use expedited removal authority for people arrested within two weeks of entering the US by land and caught within 100 miles of the border. That meant it was used mostly against immigrants recently arrived in the country.

    In the notice on Friday the administration said the authority could be used across the country and would go into effect immediately.

    The notice said the person put into expedited removal “bears the affirmative burden to show to the satisfaction of an immigration officer” that they have the right to be in the US.

    The Associated Press contributed reporting



    The Trump administration has granted Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) the power to deport immigrants who came to the United States legally under the Biden administration. This move is part of the ongoing efforts by the Trump administration to crack down on immigration and enforce stricter policies at the border.

    This decision has raised concerns among immigrant rights advocates who argue that it is unfair to target individuals who followed the legal process to come to the United States. Many fear that this could lead to increased deportations of immigrants who have been living in the country for years or have established roots here.

    The Trump administration has been vocal about their stance on immigration, with President Trump often emphasizing the need for stronger border security and stricter immigration policies. This latest move is seen as a continuation of those efforts and is likely to have a significant impact on immigrant communities across the country.

    As the debate over immigration continues to rage on, it is clear that the Trump administration is determined to take a hardline approach on the issue. The decision to give ICE the power to deport immigrants who came legally under the Biden administration is just the latest example of this ongoing crackdown.

    Tags:

    1. Trump administration news
    2. Immigration policy updates
    3. ICE deportation powers
    4. Biden administration changes
    5. Legal immigrants under threat
    6. Trump immigration crackdown
    7. Immigration enforcement updates
    8. Biden vs. Trump immigration policies
    9. Deportation of legal immigrants
    10. Immigration news update.

    #Trump #Ice #power #deport #immigrants #legally #Biden #Trump #administration

  • Trump administration bans Americans from using gender ‘X’ on passports


    Secretary of State Marco Rubio ordered the State Department to freeze all applications for passports labeling their gender as ‘X,’ in the latest attempt to reverse government options for individuals who consider themselves gender-fluid.

    ‘The policy of the United States is that an individual’s sex is not changeable,’ an email from the Secretary of State to department staff on Thursday, first reported by the Guardian. 

    Rubio insisted that a person’s ‘sex’ and not ‘gender’ should be used in official government documents, including passports and consular reports of brith abroad documents.

    The X distinction for gender was recently developed during President Joe Biden‘s administration under Secretary of State Tony Blinken.

    President Donald Trump‘s executive order signed Monday that the order would not invalidate existing passports but would need to be corrected when they were renewed.

    Trump’s order also affects Department of Homeland Security and the Office of Personnel Management to correct official government documents to remove any extra gender assignments.

    That could affect Social Security cards, drivers licenses, and other government IDs.

    The White House dismissed concerns from transgender activists that had made gains during the Biden administration to update government documents to reflect a person’s gender of their choice. 

    U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has ordered a ban on Americans selecting X as their gender on U.S. Passports

    U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has ordered a ban on Americans selecting X as their gender on U.S. Passports 

    A international traveler presents a U.S. passport

    A international traveler presents a U.S. passport 

    ‘They can still apply to renew their passport — they just have to use their God-given sex, which was decided at birth,’ White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said to NOTUS. ‘Thanks to President Trump, it is now the official policy of the federal government that there are only two sexes — male and female.’

    Under the Biden administration, U.S. citizens were given the option of selecting (X) as their gender marker on passports, visas, and Global Entry cards. 

    The State Department website included guidance for people who wanted to identify as another ‘gender identity’ such as (X). By Thursday, that page redirected to the main passport request site.

    Trump made the issue of gender part of his campaign, arguing that it fell into the realm of common sense. 

    ‘As of today, it will henceforth be the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders, male and female,’ Trump said during his inaugural address on Monday. 

    The Human Rights campaign, an organization dedicated to defending the rights of transgender individuals to choose their gender vowed to fight Trump’s agenda.

    ‘The incoming administration is trying to divide our communities in the hope that we forget what makes us strong. But we refuse to back down or be intimidated,’ they wrote in a statement. ‘We are not going anywhere. and we will fight back against these harmful provisions with everything we’ve got.’

    The first ever gender ‘X’ passport was given by the Biden state department to veteran Dana Zzyym in 2021, who served in the Navy as a young man before identifying as ‘intersex’ using they/them pronouns.

    This is the United States' first ever intersex passport, given to Navy veteran Dana Zzym in 2021

    This is the United States’ first ever intersex passport, given to Navy veteran Dana Zzym

    Dana Zzyym, pictured, a 63-year-old intersex military vet had been locked in a legal battle with the State Department for over six years, petitioning for a shift in policy to allow 'X' passport

    The inaugural intersex passport was for Dana Zzyym, a 63-year-old intersex activist and military vet who has been locked in a legal battle with the State Department for more than six years, petitioning for a shift in policy to allow intersex passports. Zzyym was denied such a document in 2015

    Zzyym sued the state department in 2015, petitioning for a shift in policy.

    The Biden administration praised the decision as a more inclusive way to handle government documents.

    ‘I want to reiterate, on the occasion of this passport issuance, the Department of State’s commitment to promoting the freedom, dignity, and equality of all people – including LGBTQI+ persons,’ State Department spokesperson Ned Price said in a statement at the time. 



    The Trump administration has recently announced a ban on Americans using the gender designation ‘X’ on their passports. This decision comes after the administration rolled back Obama-era guidelines that allowed individuals to choose a non-binary gender option on federal documents.

    Many LGBTQ advocates and allies have condemned this move, arguing that it is discriminatory and erases the identities of non-binary and gender nonconforming individuals. They argue that everyone should have the right to accurately represent their gender identity on official documents.

    The ban on using ‘X’ as a gender option on passports is a step backwards in the fight for LGBTQ rights and equality. It is important for all individuals to be able to express their gender identity in a way that feels authentic to them. The Trump administration’s decision only serves to further marginalize and erase the existence of non-binary and gender nonconforming individuals.

    Tags:

    1. Trump administration
    2. Gender X
    3. Passport regulations
    4. Identity recognition
    5. Gender identity rights
    6. LGBTQ+ community
    7. Discrimination policies
    8. Travel restrictions
    9. Government rulings
    10. Civil rights issues

    #Trump #administration #bans #Americans #gender #passports

  • Kennedy to make money on lawsuits while in Trump administration




    Kennedy’s New Money-Making Strategy: Lawsuits Against Trump Administration

    Former Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy has found a new way to make money during his retirement from the bench – by filing lawsuits against the Trump administration.

    Kennedy, who retired from the Supreme Court in 2018, has reportedly been quietly working behind the scenes to build a legal team and prepare lawsuits against various government agencies and officials. The lawsuits are said to focus on issues such as immigration, civil rights, and environmental protections.

    While some may question Kennedy’s motives for targeting the Trump administration, others see it as a savvy move to capitalize on the current political climate. With the Trump administration facing numerous legal challenges, Kennedy’s lawsuits could potentially result in hefty payouts or settlements.

    It remains to be seen how successful Kennedy’s legal endeavors will be, but one thing is for certain – he’s not afraid to take on the powers that be in pursuit of justice and financial gain. Stay tuned for updates on Kennedy’s legal battles against the Trump administration.

    Tags:

    Kennedy lawsuits, Trump administration, legal battles, government lawsuits, political litigation, financial gains, legal strategies, political controversy, Kennedy administration, litigation profits, legal disputes, government officials, legal challenges.

    #Kennedy #money #lawsuits #Trump #administration

  • Trump Administration Live Updates: Latest News on the President’s Executive Orders


    It has been less than three days since President Trump took office, but the immigration transformation he ordered has already begun.

    The Pentagon deployed 1,500 active-duty troops to the southern border on Wednesday. The head of the nation’s immigration courts was fired, along with three other senior officials. In Mexico, about 30,000 immigrants with asylum appointments arrived to find them canceled. More than 10,400 refugees around the globe who had been approved for travel to the United States suddenly found their entry denied, their airplane tickets worthless.

    “All previously scheduled travel of refugees to the United States is being canceled, and no new travel bookings will be made,” Kathryn Anderson, a top State Department official, wrote in an email late Tuesday night.

    The scope of the immigration changes laid out in scores of executive orders, presidential memorandums and policy directives is extraordinary, even when compared with the expansive agenda that Mr. Trump pursued in the first four years he occupied the White House.

    But many directives will take time to be implemented, or will face political, legal or practical obstacles. Some will be put on hold by skeptical judges. Others will require research or development by the alphabet soup of agencies involved in crafting immigration policy. Still more will require enormous amounts of money from Congress, triggering yet another fight over resources and priorities.

    At least three lawsuits have already been filed in federal court to stop Mr. Trump’s plan to reinterpret the 14th Amendment guarantee to birthright citizenship. The revival of Mr. Trump’s travel ban requires a 60-day review of which countries should be affected.

    Mr. Trump will still need billions of dollars for detention space and additional agents for his promised “mass deportations.” A directive by the Justice Department to investigate officials in so-called sanctuary cities who obstruct the administration’s immigration agenda will unfold over weeks and months as conflicts emerge.

    As a result, the exact shape of a system that helps define America’s place in a world grappling with issues of mass migration, inequality and national identity will not be known for weeks, months or even years.

    At stake is whether the United States will continue to be a place of refuge for those fleeing poverty, violence and natural disasters around the world. Taken together, the immigration orders could make it much harder for immigrants — authorized to be in the country or not — to live and work and raise families in the United States without the constant threat of arrest, criminal conviction and deportation.

    But Mr. Trump has already shown that he is willing to push further toward a vision of a country that is far less welcoming to outsiders — and in the view of his critics is an overreach with cruel consequences.

    “It’s breathtaking, both in terms of substance and just how many actions they’re taking right out of the gate,” said Heidi Altman, the federal director of advocacy at the National Immigration Law Center. “How far-reaching the impact and harm will be, but also just in terms of the sheer willingness to break the law and attempt to unilaterally rewrite the Constitution.”

    Declaring an Invasion

    Mr. Trump justified his reshaping of immigration policy with a declaration that there is an “invasion at the southern border.” He used that charge to claim vast powers to block entry to the United States, round up and detain immigrants, ban travel, restrict birthright citizenship, build a border wall and end asylum for people seeking refuge.

    In 2017, Mr. Trump pursued some of the same restrictions on immigration, many of which were reversed by President Joseph R. Biden Jr. Eight years later, polls show the president has more support in the country for aggressive limits on immigration, in part because of a surge in migrants crossing the southern border during much of Mr. Biden’s time in office. And Mr. Trump repeatedly says his election victory gives him a mandate to secure the border and cleanse the country of people whom he deems unwanted.

    To counter what he calls an invasion, Mr. Trump relies — as he did during his first term — on decades of laws that give the president broad authority to protect and defend the United States against threats inside the country and outside its borders. They include laws related to national security, immigration, public health and the country’s economy.

    But this time, he appears ready to go much further.

    President Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 in his Inaugural Address on Monday, pledging to use federal and state law enforcement to get rid of foreign gangs and criminal networks in the United States.Credit…Tamir Kalifa for The New York Times

    “By invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1798,” he said during his Inaugural Address on Monday, “I will direct our government to use the full and immense power of federal and state law enforcement to eliminate the presence of all foreign gangs and criminal networks bringing devastating crime to U.S. soil, including our cities and inner cities.”

    It will be, he promised, “at a level that nobody has ever seen before.”

    The executive orders Mr. Trump has signed in the days since then back up that assertion. Many of the actions he put in motion were not part of his agenda the first time around: designating all Mexican cartels to be terrorist organizations; creating new task forces to round up and deport migrants; imposing the death penalty on murderers not legally in the country.

    On Wednesday, the Defense Department announced that it would begin using military planes to help border officials deport immigrants to other countries and that it would assign some forces to help construct temporary and permanent barriers along the border. Border Patrol agents have also been instructed to no longer release any migrant who had crossed the border out into the public to await their cases, according to an official familiar with the matter. Agents have been instructed to rapidly turn away migrants without providing them the chance to ask for asylum.

    Eight years ago, Mr. Trump lowered the number of refugees that the United States would take each year. On Monday, he simply ordered the program suspended altogether, with language that advocates believe will mean it never starts up again while he is president.

    “He’s throwing so much out there that this time the suspension of the refugee program seems like almost a small thing,” said David J. Bier, the director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute, a libertarian research group. He said Mr. Trump’s strategy was to overwhelm the courts and watchdog groups.

    “They’re just throwing as much out there to justify what they want to do,” he said.

    Instilling Fear

    On Tuesday evening, Justice Department employees received a memo ordering U.S. attorneys around the country to investigate and prosecute law enforcement officials in states and cities if they refuse to enforce the Trump administration’s new immigration policies

    “Federal law prohibits state and local actors from resisting, obstructing and otherwise failing to comply with lawful immigration-related commands,” wrote Emil Bove III, the department’s acting deputy attorney general and a former member of the president’s criminal defense team. Federal officials “shall investigate incidents involving any such misconduct for potential prosecution,” he wrote.

    The memo was one of scores of threats that may not happen right away. But their power — at least in the short run — is in the fear they instill.

    In similar fashion, Mr. Trump quickly eliminated a Biden-era policy that largely protected “sensitive” areas like churches, schools and hospitals from being the targets of immigration raids.

    “Criminals will no longer be able to hide in America’s schools and churches to avoid arrest,” a spokesman for the Homeland Security Department said.

    On Wednesday, the Defense Department announced that it would begin using military planes to help border officials deport immigrants.Credit…Cesar Rodriguez for The New York Times

    Jason Houser, the former chief of staff at the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency under Mr. Biden, disagreed.

    “I find it absurd to claim national security is compromised if immigration enforcement avoids third-grade classrooms, churches, D.M.V.s and hospitals,” he said. “Rolling back sensitive-location protections risks undermining community trust and, ultimately, ICE’s ability to effectively protect our communities in the long term.”

    As of Wednesday, immigration advocates said they were not aware of instances in which Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents had descended on a place previously considered off limits for immigration raids. But several said the message was clear to immigrants already worried about their fate now that Mr. Trump was back in the White House.

    “That’s when it becomes like terror, you know?” Ms. Altman said.

    Still in Progress

    The list of dramatic changes is long.

    D.H.S. officials have been instructed to require health information and criminal history from “aliens engaged in the invasion across the southern border” so that they can be barred from entering. One executive order directs officials to gather that information from all “aliens,” leaving open the possibility that all immigrants, including those flying from other countries around the world, could be subject to much greater scrutiny.

    Officials have been tasked with creating Homeland Security Task Forces to work with local and state law enforcement agencies to locate, arrest and deport migrants.

    Federal departments that work with nongovernmental organizations and other humanitarian groups have been instructed to launch audits of those groups to ensure that no federal money is going to support undocumented immigrants.

    Migrants waiting at a welcome center in El Paso last month. Eight years ago, Mr. Trump lowered the number of refugees that the United States would take each year. On Monday, he simply ordered the program suspended altogether.Credit…Paul Ratje for The New York Times

    That has sent chills through the nonprofit community. Many groups have spent decades helping to feed, clothe, house and find work for immigrants when they arrive in the United States. Many of those immigrants need help while they are in immigration proceedings to determine whether they can stay.

    The 1,500 active-duty troops being sent to the southwestern border will join 2,500 Army Reserve and National Guard soldiers called to active duty in recent months to support federal law enforcement officials. Their missions include detection and monitoring, data entry, training, transportation and maintenance.

    It is unclear what roles the 4,000 troops will now have under the Trump administration.

    Experts said the border orders and transition to Mr. Trump would probably lead to even lower numbers of migrants seeking asylum at the southern border.

    “The border will be very quiet at first,” said Adam Isacson, a border security expert at the Washington Office on Latin America, a human rights advocacy organization. “The first months of Trump’s last term saw the fewest migrant apprehensions of the entire 21st century. We may see even fewer in the coming months.”

    Instead, he said, migrants will be incentivized to cross the border without detection.

    Eric Schmitt contributed reporting from Washington.



    Here are the latest updates on the Trump administration’s executive orders:

    1. President Trump signs executive order to expand access to healthcare options: On October 12, 2020, President Trump signed an executive order aimed at expanding access to affordable healthcare options for Americans. The order directs federal agencies to take action to increase choice and competition in the healthcare market, with a focus on expanding telehealth services and lowering prescription drug prices.

    2. President Trump signs executive order to address police reform: On June 16, 2020, President Trump signed an executive order aimed at improving policing practices and accountability. The order includes provisions to incentivize police departments to adopt best practices, increase transparency and data collection, and provide training on de-escalation techniques.

    3. President Trump signs executive order on immigration: On April 22, 2020, President Trump signed an executive order suspending immigration into the United States for 60 days in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The order also includes provisions to protect American jobs and workers during the economic downturn caused by the pandemic.

    Stay tuned for more updates on President Trump’s executive orders and their impact on various policy areas.

    Tags:

    Trump Administration, President Trump, Executive Orders, Latest News, Live Updates, White House, Politics, Government, US News, Trump Policies.

    #Trump #Administration #Live #Updates #Latest #News #Presidents #Executive #Orders

  • Trump administration deletes Biden’s reproductive rights website


    A government website created by the Biden administration outlining reproductive rights following the 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson has apparently been removed by the Trump administration within hours of President Donald Trump taking office.

    Repoductiverights.gov was launched to provide resources for those seeking information on subjects such as birth control, abortion and reproductive health care.

    “Reproductive health care, including access to birth control and safe and legal abortion care, is an essential part of your health and well-being,” the website stated last week. “While Roe v. Wade was overturned, abortion remains legal in many states, and other reproductive health care services remain protected by law. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is committed to providing you with accurate and up-to-date information about access to and coverage of reproductive health care and resources. Our goal is to make sure you have appropriate information and support.”

    In the wake of the decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, the Biden administration said it would “increase outreach and public education efforts regarding access to reproductive health care services—including abortion—to ensure that Americans have access to reliable and accurate information about their rights and access to care.”

    RELATED STORY | Enrique Tarrio, former Proud Boys leader, released from prison after pardon

    President Trump’s stance on abortion has wavered throughout the years, although he has largely given himself credit for overturning Roe v. Wade after appointing three conservatives to the Supreme Court in his first term.

    He has also expressed support for in vitro fertilization rights, which were subject to scrutiny in the wake of Dobbs v. Jackson. It is unclear, however, whether Trump would support a national law guaranteeing a right to IVF treatment nationwide. In 2024, Senate Republicans blocked proposed legislation that would have prohibited states from enacting bans on IVF treatment.

    Planned Parenthood President Alexis McGill Johnson noted the uncertainty moving forward regarding reproductive rights. 

    “For Planned Parenthood and the communities we serve, today is a day of profound uncertainty and unwavering determination. Many are wrestling with anxiety about what the future holds. While we can’t predict what the coming days, weeks, or months will bring, one thing remains certain: Planned Parenthood will hold firm, fighting relentlessly against every attempt to undermine or take away access to trusted, affordable, and essential sexual and reproductive health care,” she said.

    RELATED STORY | Trump signs executive order declaring a national emergency at the southern US border





    Recently, the Trump administration made the decision to delete former Vice President Joe Biden’s reproductive rights website. This move has sparked outrage among pro-choice advocates and has raised concerns about the future of women’s healthcare in the United States.

    The website, which was created during Biden’s time in office, contained valuable information about reproductive health services, birth control options, and abortion rights. By deleting this website, the Trump administration is effectively erasing important resources that many women rely on for accurate and up-to-date information about their reproductive rights.

    This decision comes at a time when reproductive rights are under attack across the country, with numerous states passing restrictive abortion laws and the Supreme Court potentially poised to overturn Roe v. Wade. Deleting Biden’s reproductive rights website is just another way the Trump administration is undermining women’s access to essential healthcare services.

    It is crucial that we continue to fight for reproductive rights and ensure that all women have access to the care they need. Deleting this website is a blatant attempt to erase valuable information and silence those who advocate for women’s rights. We must stand up against these attacks and defend access to reproductive healthcare for all.

    Tags:

    1. Trump administration
    2. Biden
    3. Reproductive rights
    4. Website
    5. Politics
    6. Women’s rights
    7. Government
    8. Health
    9. Controversy
    10. Policy changes

    #Trump #administration #deletes #Bidens #reproductive #rights #website

  • Inside Trump’s Second Administration | TIME


    One by one, they had all trickled into the walnut-paneled Mansfield Room. Donald Trump had just made another improbable return: his first visit to the U.S. Capitol since a mob of his supporters stormed the building on Jan. 6, 2021. Now, just days away from reclaiming power, the President-elect was there to meet with the 52 Republican Senators of the 119th Congress about advancing his legislative agenda: a massive border security package, extending his 2017 tax cuts, and dispensing with the debt ceiling.

    After more than an hour of wrangling over strategy, Senator Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, tried to wrap things up, according to one of the GOP senators present. “Sir,” she told Trump, “I want to respect your time and get you out of here so you can move on to your other commitments.” Trump raised his eyebrows and interjected. “I have no other commitments,” he said. “This is my legacy.” The Jan. 8 meeting lasted nearly another hour.

    trump senate republicans capitol meeting
    President-elect Donald Trump speaks to the press following a meeting with Senate Republicans at the U.S. Capitol Building in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 8, 2025.Valerie Plesch—Bloomberg/Getty Images

    Despite Trump’s visions of enhanced executive authority, it was a recognition that his success will rest on the cooperation—or capitulation—of others. Even before his inauguration, he has been racking up wins. When Israel and Hamas announced a ceasefire after 15 months of war, Israeli officials credited Trump’s demand that the terror group release the hostages or else “all hell will break loose.” As President Biden warned in his farewell address of an ultra-wealthy oligarchy taking shape, the corporate titans he was referencing were cozying up to Trump in unsubtle displays of anticipatory obedience. Congressional Republicans similarly continue to bend to his will—whether it’s the few House members who threatened to derail Mike Johnson’s reelection for Speaker of the House, or the key Senator who expressed doubts about former Fox News host Pete Hegseth as Defense Secretary. Ultimately, they all backed down. “The way he went to bat for Mike Johnson and cracked down on dissenters sent a message to me and a lot of others to back off,” says a Republican Senator close to Trump. “Don’t ruin this.”

    Even with all that political capital, Trump still faces limits to his power. Republican legislators balked at his request to use recess appointments to install his more controversial Cabinet picks. When it became clear there were enough holdouts to tank his choice of Matt Gaetz for Attorney General, Trump told the former Florida congressman to step aside. Today, he’s navigating the competing demands of Republicans in purple and ruby red districts as they try to carve out a legislative framework for his signature domestic priorities. And despite Trump’s GOP having full control of Washington, the threat of internecine divisions derailing his plans looms large. “When you have majorities in each chamber,” a Trump advisor says, “the worry is that it would become a circular firing squad.”

    That remains a possibility. For Trump, who won on a promise to reshape government, the greatest obstacle may be just how far his own party is willing to let him go. In private meetings, sources close to Trump say the President keeps expressing a desire to move fast, fully aware that the window for maximal disruption won’t stay open for long. “Your biggest opportunities for change are in the first couple of years, and even more so in the first 18 months, because that’s ahead of elections,” says a senior Trump official. “He’s at the apex of power now. Every month that goes by, he has a little bit less.”

    Donald Trump Inauguration Time Magazine cover
    Photograph by Saul Loeb—Pool/AP

    Click here to order your copy of this issue

    If you want to know how a candidate will govern, the clues are often in how they campaigned. Trump’s 2016 bid was marked by chaos, leaking, and vicious infighting. He trudged through three separate campaign managers. His 2024 campaign was far more disciplined; there was hardly any turnover and they succeeded in ways few saw coming: broadening the tent while pleasing his base, winning the popular vote, and clinching a decisive Electoral College victory. Much of that credit goes to Susie Wiles, his de facto underboss who will serve as White House Chief of Staff.

    So there was little surprise when Trump asked Wiles to take on the vital role. Inside the West Wing, she will be tasked with maintaining order and cohesion among the executive branch and Trump’s far-flung coalition. One of Trump’s deputy chiefs of staff, James Blair, will be a liaison to Congress. Another longtime advisor, Stephen Miller, will have broad discretion to shape executive policy, while Dan Scavino will manage Trump’s social media and be a constant presence by his side. Taylor Budowich, a seasoned MAGA stalwart, will oversee hiring in the executive branch and media strategy. All of them worked on the last campaign and will try to translate an operation that worked for them on the trail into a model for unconventional governance.

    Susie Wiles
    Susie Wiles, Donald Trump’s top campaign adviser who will serve as White House Chief of Staff, at a rally in Wildwood, N.J., on May 11, 2024.Doug Mills—The New York Times/Redux

    As Trump’s Cabinet picks were sending shockwaves through Washington late last month, Wiles laid out a theory of her boss’s unorthodox appointments in a call with senior transition staff: “RFK is going to be a disruptor, Elon Musk is going to be a disruptor. Kash Patel is going to be a disruptor.” One of Trump’s biggest regrets of his first term, he told TIME in April, was the people he hired who tried to block his most norm-shattering, and in some cases dangerous, ideas. But now he’s been elected on an unambiguous promise to wage war on the institutions of government and deliver sweeping transformations. His Cabinet nominees, Wiles told her underlings, according to two sources familiar with the call, were chosen to deliver on that promise. “He wants people that can disrupt alongside him.”

    Read More: Donald Trump’s Disruption Is Back

    To critics, Trump’s nominations reflect another impulse: to install obedient, often inexperienced, acolytes who will acquiesce to his demands to turn the government into an instrument for his own self-interest. In some instances, Trump’s antagonists see an explicit quid pro quo. In exchange for Kennedy endorsing Trump last summer, says Lisa Gilbert, co-president of the progressive government watchdog Public Citizen, Trump picked the vaccine critic to lead the Department of Health and Human Services. In exchange for Musk donating $250 million to his campaign, she alleges, Trump rewarded the billionaire whose businesses hold various U.S. government contracts with his own commission tasked with shrinking the size of government. “There is no clearer instance of a direct tit-for-tat interaction,” says Gilbert.

    Beyond Trump’s Cabinet and inner circle, the administration expects to harness an array of outside groups, social media influencers, and right-wing media personalities to shape narratives and apply pressure on Republicans who might obstruct the Trump agenda. They were already deployed in full force to squash any GOP squeamishness on Hegseth, who Trump wants to lead the Pentagon despite questions about his experience, his views, and accusations leveled against him of alcohol abuse and sexual assault that he’s denied. When Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst, a veteran up for re-election in two years, expressed reservation about Hegseth, who has said women should not serve in combat,  she drew an onslaught of social media harassment, revved up by the likes of Steve Bannon and Gaetz, now an anchor for the pro-Trump One America News Network. “How do I make it stop?” Ernst asked one of her fellow Republican senators, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations. “She toe-dipped in her opposition,” the GOP senator tells TIME, “and felt the immediate backlash.”

    Another source familiar with the matter tells TIME that a Trump ally informed Ernst that the President would support a primary challenge against her in Iowa—where Trump won the caucuses last year by roughly 30 points—if she blocked Hegseth. At the same time, Musk quietly back-channeled a message to Senators, according to two sources familiar with the matter: anyone who votes against Trump’s Cabinet secretaries will face a multi-million dollar Musk-funded Super PAC to oust them from office in their next primary. Ernst ultimately signaled she would back Hegseth.

    “That’s the reality that all these members live in the next couple years here,” says a source close to Trump. “They all get in line at the end of the day.”

    There’s still always the potential for trouble in a MAGA paradise. There are competing factions within Trump’s orbit with their own agendas. Some of that has already spilled into public view, such as Bannon’s tussle with Musk over H1B visas, through which U.S. companies, including Musk’s, import skilled workers from other countries. To Trump, the argument is part of the fun—and his decision-making process. “He doesn’t mind the squabble,” says a Trump aide. “He likes to see the conversation hash out and see where the conversation online lives and where the base is on things.”

    Elon Musk with President-elect Donald Trump at SpaceX Starbase in Boca Chica, Texas, on Nov. 19, 2024. Brandon Bell—Pool/AP

    In the end, Trump sided with the SpaceX founder over whether the H-1B program was worth continuing. Trump, after all, uses them at his clubs and hotels. Plus Musk has more than $300 billion. Bannon does not. But over the coming years, such quarrels may serve as a barometer for which voices in his ear will have the most influence, and the extent to which Trump remains sensitive to public pushback. Trump aides say he is more intent than he was in his first term on remaking the federal bureaucracy, and less concerned with appeasing those who might stand in his way.  “His risk tolerance is higher,” says a senior Trump official.

    For everything Trump may be able to accomplish without the help of the legislature, every President aims to sign major, far-reaching pieces of legislation. Trump’s checklist in Congress will be passing a border security bill and making his tax cuts permanent. There’s also the debt ceiling, which Congress must agree to either raise or eliminate entirely. In public and in private, Trump says he would prefer to pass his border security measures and raise the debt ceiling in one package, whereas some leading members of Congress insist on doing them separately. On some level, it’s a simple process argument, but it’s also a test of how Trump will handle resistance from his own party after becoming accustomed to their subservience over the course of his march to power. 

    Perhaps most of all, it may reveal whether Trump, ten years into his life as a politician, has learned that most Washington of lessons: sometimes you need to lose a few fights to win a bigger one. Toward the end of his Jan. 8 meeting with the Republican Senators, he pushed hard for one bill but, by the end, eventually relented that he could accept either method. All that really matters, he said, was that it gets done. “I’ll sign one bill, I’ll sign two bills. I’ll sign 10 bills,” he said. “Whatever it takes.”



    As President Trump gears up for his second term in office, many are left wondering what his administration will look like. With a mix of familiar faces and new appointments, Trump is poised to continue his agenda for the next four years.

    One key aspect of Trump’s second administration is the emphasis on loyalty. Many of his top advisors and cabinet members from his first term are expected to stay on, including Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and Secretary of Defense Mark Esper. Trump has made it clear that he values loyalty above all else, and those who have stood by him through thick and thin will be rewarded with continued positions of power.

    However, there are also rumors of new faces joining the administration. Trump is reportedly considering bringing in more moderate voices to help bridge the gap between the administration and Congress. Names being floated include former Governor Chris Christie and former Senator Jeff Flake, both of whom have been critical of Trump in the past but could bring a much-needed sense of bipartisanship to the table.

    Overall, Trump’s second administration is expected to be a mix of continuity and change. With familiar faces staying on and new voices entering the fold, it remains to be seen how Trump will navigate the challenges of his second term. One thing is for certain – with Trump at the helm, there will be no shortage of controversy and drama in the years to come. Stay tuned as we continue to cover the latest developments inside Trump’s second administration.

    Tags:

    Trump administration, politics, government, president, Trump news, White House, current events, US politics, Trump policies, TIME article

    #Trumps #Administration #TIME

  • Trump administration strips schools, churches of immigration enforcement protections : NPR


    President Trump appears in the Oval Office on Monday. Trump takes office for his second term as the 47th president of the United States. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

    President Trump appears in the Oval Office following his inauguration on Monday.

    Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images


    hide caption

    toggle caption

    Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

    Immigration authorities can now enter schools, healthcare facilities and places of worship to conduct arrests, according to a new policy from the Department of Homeland Security.

    “Criminals will no longer be able to hide in America’s schools and churches to avoid arrest,” a DHS spokesperson said in a statement. “The Trump administration will not tie the hands of our brave law enforcement, and instead trusts them to use common sense.”

    The directive, which covers agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection, rescinds guidance from the Biden administration that created “protected areas” that primarily consisted of places where “children gather, disaster or emergency relief sites, and social services establishments.”

    The Biden-era guideline mandated that immigration enforcement operations shouldn’t take place  in or near a location that would limit peoples’ access to “essential” services or activities.

    A second directive DHS announced on Tuesday also followed through on one of President Trump’s executive orders signed Monday night to “terminate all categorical parole programs that are contrary to the policies of the United States established in my Executive Orders,” including the humanitarian parole program for people from Nicaragua, Cuba, Haiti and Venezuela.

    Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan, told CNN on Tuesday that “ICE is back doing their job, effective today,” and that agents are focused on migrants considered a public safety threat.

    Homan said arrests of migrants without a criminal record could also be swept up by ICE, especially those living in sanctuary jurisdictions: cities where local law enforcement is prohibited from assisting federal immigration officials.

    He declined to provide specific information on locations.

    “There are going to be more collateral arrests in sanctuary cities because they forced us to go into the community and find the guy we are looking for,” Homan said.



    The Trump administration recently announced a new policy that removes protections against immigration enforcement at schools, churches, and other sensitive locations. This move has raised concerns among educators, religious leaders, and advocates who fear that it will deter immigrant communities from accessing vital services and participating in public life. Stay informed and learn more about the impact of this decision on NPR. #ImmigrationEnforcement #TrumpAdministration #NPR.

    Tags:

    1. Trump administration
    2. Immigration enforcement
    3. Schools
    4. Churches
    5. Immigration policy
    6. NPR
    7. Immigration protections
    8. Trump administration news
    9. Education news
    10. Religious institutions

    #Trump #administration #strips #schools #churches #immigration #enforcement #protections #NPR

Chat Icon