Tag: administration

  • Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) Poised for Growth as Biden Administration Advances AI Infrastructure with Executive Order


    We recently compiled a list of the Top 10 AI Stocks on Latest Analyst Ratings and News. In this article, we are going to take a look at where Palantir Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:PLTR) stands against the other AI stocks.

    As President Joe Biden nears the end of his term, he is issuing a series of executive orders. In the latest, the President has signed an order to provide federal support to address the massive energy needs of fast-growing advanced artificial intelligence data centers.

    READ NOW: Top 10 AI Stocks on Wall Street’s Radar  and 15 Important AI News and Ratings on Investors’ Radar

    The order will allow federal land owned by the Defense and Energy departments to host gigawatt-scale AI data centers and new clean power facilities. According to Biden, the order will “accelerate the speed at which we build the next generation of AI infrastructure here in America, in a way that enhances economic competitiveness, national security, AI safety, and clean energy”.

    According to the order, companies tapping federal land for AI data centers must also purchase an “appropriate share” of American-made semiconductors. These purchases will be decided on a case-by-case basis.

    “It’s really vital that we ensure that the AI industry can build out the infrastructure for training and using powerful AI models here in the United States”.

    Several known names, including OpenAI Senior Vice President of Global Affairs Chris Lehane, have commended this effort. Lehane also called out for cultivating a robust domestic infrastructure for the growing U.S. artificial intelligence sector.

    “So what you get with the Biden administration today is — at least from a signaling perspective — on federal land, trying to short the timeline between when you can get your project shovels in the ground and then the project going forward”.

    According to Lehane, the incoming Trump administration sees AI through two lenses — national security and economic security. He hopes that both sides of the coin will amalgamate into a national strategy.

    AI Company OpenAI has also recently laid out its vision for artificial intelligence development in the U.S. According to the company, the US needs investment from abroad and supportive regulation to stay ahead of China in the race for nascent technology. In a 15-page document called the “Economic Blueprint”, it said that “Chips, data, and energy are the keys to winning AI” and that the U.S. needs to act now to craft nationwide rules that can help secure its advantage.



    Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) Poised for Growth as Biden Administration Advances AI Infrastructure with Executive Order

    As the Biden administration continues to prioritize the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure in the United States, companies like Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) are set to benefit from the increased focus on AI technologies.

    On February 24, 2021, President Biden signed an executive order aimed at boosting the country’s AI capabilities and ensuring that the U.S. remains a global leader in AI innovation. The order includes initiatives to promote AI research and development, expand AI education and training programs, and increase access to AI resources for federal agencies.

    Palantir Technologies, a leading AI software company known for its data analytics and integration platforms, stands to benefit from the administration’s efforts to bolster AI infrastructure. The company’s technology is already used by government agencies, defense contractors, and private sector companies to analyze and interpret large volumes of data, making it a key player in the AI ecosystem.

    With the Biden administration’s renewed focus on AI, Palantir Technologies is well-positioned to capitalize on the growing demand for advanced data analytics solutions. The company’s strong track record in providing AI-driven insights and its established relationships with government agencies make it a promising investment for investors looking to capitalize on the AI boom.

    In conclusion, Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) is poised for growth as the Biden administration advances AI infrastructure with its recent executive order. With its cutting-edge technology and proven track record in the AI space, the company is well-positioned to benefit from the increasing demand for AI solutions in the public and private sectors. Investors looking to capitalize on the growth of the AI industry should keep a close eye on Palantir Technologies as it continues to expand its presence in the market.

    Tags:

    Palantir Technologies Inc., PLTR, Biden administration, AI infrastructure, executive order, growth potential, data analytics, government contracts, technology sector, machine learning, artificial intelligence, big data, cybersecurity, government partnerships

    #Palantir #Technologies #PLTR #Poised #Growth #Biden #Administration #Advances #Infrastructure #Executive #Order

  • Colbert mourns his ‘last show of the Biden administration,’ jokes he may get pulled off the air under Trump


    CBS late night host Stephen Colbert mourned the end of the Biden presidency on Thursday, pointing out that it was his last episode of “The Late Show” during President Biden’s term in office.

    Calling it the “end of an era,” Colbert also joked that he may not be on the air anymore during President-elect Donald Trump’s second term, which will begin on Monday, Jan. 20.

    “Yeah, it’s been a good run. It’s been a good run, Joe. Thank you. Thank you for all your efforts. The next time you all see me, Donald Trump will be president. And you may not see me,” the anti-Trump comedian told viewers.

    BIDEN COMMUTES SENTENCES OF 37 FEDERAL DEATH ROW INMATES IN FINAL MONTH OF PRESIDENCY

    “The Late Show” host Stephen Colbert lamented the end of the Biden presidency during the Thursday night episode of his CBS program. 

    During his opening monologue, the late-night host remarked that the broadcast would be bittersweet considering Biden’s exit from the Oval Office. 

    “Tonight, it’s just a little, little, a little bit of sweet and sour, a little semi-sweet chocolate chip. It’s the end of an era, because this is our last show of the Biden Administration.”

    The in-house audience responded with a sigh of disappointment.

    The host added that over the “next four years,” the show’s crew will be “taking this one day at a time.”

    Colbert’s show has offered staunch anti-Trump resistance in joke form throughout the incoming president’s political career.

    A Media Research Center study found that during the height of Trump’s second presidential campaign, Colbert ripped the then-candidate around 40 times more than his presidential opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris. 

    CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE

    Late night hosts like Stephen Colbert and Jimmy Kimmel have gone easy on President Biden in their material throughout his presidency, at least compared to how they’ve treated Trump.  (Scott Kowalchyk/CBS via Getty Images; Screenshot/Voto Latino;2022 Media Access Awards Presented By Easterseals/Getty Images for Easterseals)

    Colbert didn’t completely spare Biden from a jab or two. In one instance, the host mocked him for a “meandering metaphor” that he used during his presidential farewell address on Wednesday.

    The program played a clip of the president stating, “Like America, the Statue of Liberty is not standing still. She’s on the march and she literally moves. She was built to sway back and forth to withstand the fury of stormy weather, to stand the test of time, because storms are always coming. She sways a few inches, but she never falls into the current below.”

    When the camera returned to Colbert, he had donned aviators sunglasses and gave a Biden impression. “What I’m saying is, run! The Statue of Liberty is alive, everybody! Get out of there! No, no, It’s alive! I saw it in a documentary – ‘Ghostbusters 2.’ You got to spray the insides with that angry goo. Don’t cross the streams.”

    “Who you gonna call? Not me. Joe Biden out, everybody!” Colbert said, ending the bit.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Last March, before Biden’s July exit from the 2024 presidential race, Colbert hosted a glitzy fundraiser for the president’s re-election campaign.



    Late-night host Stephen Colbert recently bid a humorous farewell to what he called his “last show of the Biden administration,” joking that he may soon be pulled off the air under the upcoming Trump administration.

    Colbert, known for his satirical take on politics and current events, quipped about the uncertainty of his future in a Trump-led country during his monologue on “The Late Show.”

    “As we say goodbye to the Biden administration, I just want to remind everyone that I may not be here for much longer,” Colbert joked. “You never know when the Trump administration might decide to pull the plug on this show. So enjoy it while you can, folks!”

    The audience erupted in laughter as Colbert continued to poke fun at the political landscape and the potential impact on his late-night career.

    While the comedian’s comments were made in jest, they also served as a reminder of the ever-changing nature of American politics and the role that satire and comedy play in navigating the turbulent waters of the current climate.

    As Colbert navigates the shifting tides of the political landscape, one thing is for sure: his sharp wit and clever humor will continue to entertain audiences and provide much-needed comic relief in an increasingly polarized world.

    Tags:

    1. Colbert Biden administration
    2. Colbert last show
    3. Colbert Trump administration
    4. Colbert jokes
    5. Late Show with Colbert
    6. Colbert political comedy
    7. Late night television
    8. Biden administration humor
    9. Trump presidency jokes
    10. Colbert comedy show

    #Colbert #mourns #show #Biden #administration #jokes #pulled #air #Trump

  • Trump revokes Biden order that had set 50% electric vehicles target for 2030 | Trump administration


    Donald Trump took aim at federal support for the sale of electric vehicles (EVs) on Monday, amid a flurry of promised executive orders on his first day back in the White House.

    “The United States will not sabotage our own industries while China pollutes with impunity,” Trump said during a ceremony at Capitol One Arena, where he signed a raft of executive orders before a roaring crowd.

    One of those orders revokes 78 Biden-era actions, including a 2021 executive order aimed at making half of all new vehicles sold in 2030 electric.

    That target was not binding. It also won support from top automakers.

    “These clean car rollbacks will burden Americans with a Trumpfecta of higher prices, more pollution and weaker competitiveness,” said Dan Becker, director of the safe climate transport campaign at the environmental non-profit Center for Biological Diversity. “Our kids and everyone with lungs will pay the price for these politically motivated rollbacks of protections for our air and the climate.”

    Trump’s order is part of a promised push to repeal environmental protections introduced by Biden and to support US makers of gas-powered cars. He has also promised to roll back auto pollution standards finalized by Biden’s administration last spring – a rule Trump calls an “EV mandate”, though it did not directly require the production of electric vehicles.

    Read more of the Guardian’s Trump coverage



    In a recent move, the Trump administration has revoked an order set by President Biden that aimed to achieve a 50% target for electric vehicles by 2030. This decision comes as a blow to the efforts to combat climate change and transition towards cleaner forms of transportation. Stay tuned for more updates on this controversial development. #Trump #Biden #ElectricVehicles #ClimateChange #Administration

    Tags:

    1. Trump revokes Biden order
    2. Electric vehicles target for 2030
    3. Trump administration news
    4. Biden administration policy
    5. Environmental regulations
    6. Clean energy goals
    7. Trump executive order
    8. Electric vehicle industry
    9. Biden administration impact
    10. Government policy changes

    #Trump #revokes #Biden #order #set #electric #vehicles #target #Trump #administration

  • Who’s in Donald Trump’s new administration? A snapshot of age, race and gender


    Sixteen women. Twelve TV and news media personalities. Ten immigrants. A former NFL football player. These are among the first 100 people who President-elect Donald Trump has named to various positions for his upcoming administration. To examine who will be in Trump’s upcoming administration, the Hearst Television Data Team analyzed a snapshot of the first 100 people Trump announced positions for on this Truth Social account.The growing total number of people in Trump’s administration will vary based on how many new positions are created and typical turnover. And, many of the nominees still require Senate confirmation to be official. Trump’s administration thus far doesn’t represent the U.S. population in two key areas: race and gender.White people were overrepresented among Trump’s first 100 administration names. While only about 58% of the United States is white, they make up 87% of Trump’s first picks.Viewing in the app? Click here for the best interactive experienceAmong the first 100, only one Black person has been named — former NFL player and head of the White House Opportunity and Revitalization Council, Scott Turner. Trump tapped Turner as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.Hispanic and Latino people were also underrepresented, but Trump’s percentage of Asian/Pacific Islander administration members matches the country’s general population. Only 16% of Trump’s first administration picks were women — far below the half of the country they represent. That percent matches how many Republican women are in the 119th U.S. Congress but is below the percentage of congressional Democrats who are women, 42%. The most common birth state among Trump’s new administration of those that were publicly available is New York — matching where the President-elect was born. California is the second most common.Trump’s new team spans at least 25 different states, D.C. and American Samoa, where Tulsi Gabbard — the National Intelligence Director nominee — was born. The Hearst Television Data Team only examined birth states, not current residences of the new Trump administration.There are also a sizable number of immigrants and foreign-born people among Trump’s upcoming administration — despite his first-term “Build the Wall” stance and 2024 promise of mass deportations. Recently, Trump said he’s considering a skilled workers immigration program, a shift from his old views against H-1B visas.Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk — who was a top political donor to Trump and once had an H-1B visa— was born in South Africa before later immigrating to Canada and then the United States. Musk will co-lead the newly created Department of Government Efficiency.In addition to South Africa, Trump’s new administration members come from India, the United Kingdom, Cuba, Ireland, Lebanon and the Netherlands. While not an immigrant, Deputy Secretary of State nominee Christopher Landau was born in Spain while his father was stationed there with the Foreign Service.As for age, Trump’s first 100 administration members represent a near-perfect bell curve. The youngest is Taylor Budowich — deputy chief of staff for communications and personnel — at 27 years old, and the oldest is Keith Kellogg — special envoy for Ukraine and Russia — at 80 years old.Kellogg is the only one among Trump’s initial staff older than the 78-year-old President-elect.There are also at least four publicly out LGBTQ+ individuals among Trump’s first 100 administration picks. They include Secretary of Treasury nominee Scott Bessent; Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment nominee Jacob Helberg; presidential envoy for special missions nominee Richard Grenell; and Ambassador to Belgium nominee Bill White.That’s close to the 7.6% of American adults who identify as LGBTQ+, according to a 2023 Gallup poll. There are also at least 12 former TV stars and news media contributors who have landed top roles in the new Trump administration.One of the biggest names is Secretary of Defense nominee Pete Hegseth, who cohosted “Fox & Friends” from 2017-2024. The military veteran recently faced a heated Senate confirmation hearing, where he was asked questions about his qualifications and a sexual assault allegation, which he has denied.Below are all the TV personalities and news media contributors among Trump’s first administration picks, where they used to work and the role they were nominated for.Tom Homan: Fox News commentator (border czar)Mike Huckabee: Fox News talk show host (Ambassador to Israel)Pete Hegseth: “Fox & Friends” cohost (Secretary of Defense)Sean Duffy: Fox Business cohost and Fox News contributor (Secretary of Transportation)Mehmet Oz: Host of “The Dr. Oz Show” (CMS Administrator)Matthew Whitaker: CNN contributor (Ambassador to NATO)Sebastian Gorka: NewsMaxTV media host and commentator (Senior Director for Counterterrorism)Marty Makary: The Washington Post and Wall Street Journal contributor (FDA chief)Monica Crowley: Fox News contributor and The Washington Times opinion editor (Ambassador, Assistant Secretary of State and Chief of Protocol) Kimberly Guilfoyle: Fox News co-host (Ambassador to Greece)Kari Lake: KSAZ-TV news anchor (director of Voice of America)Richard Grenell: Fox News contributor (Presidential Envoy for Special Missions) Mike/Michael was the most common name among Trump’s first 100 administration picks and also in the 119th Congress — both at about 6%. Only 1% of the U.S. population is named Mike/Michael, according to mynamestats.com.There are 26 Mikes/Michaels in the 119th Congress and six named among Trump’s first 100 administration picks.PHNjcmlwdCB0eXBlPSJ0ZXh0L2phdmFzY3JpcHQiPiFmdW5jdGlvbigpeyJ1c2Ugc3RyaWN0Ijt3aW5kb3cuYWRkRXZlbnRMaXN0ZW5lcigibWVzc2FnZSIsKGZ1bmN0aW9uKGUpe2lmKHZvaWQgMCE9PWUuZGF0YVsiZGF0YXdyYXBwZXItaGVpZ2h0Il0pe3ZhciB0PWRvY3VtZW50LnF1ZXJ5U2VsZWN0b3JBbGwoImlmcmFtZSIpO2Zvcih2YXIgYSBpbiBlLmRhdGFbImRhdGF3cmFwcGVyLWhlaWdodCJdKWZvcih2YXIgcj0wO3I8dC5sZW5ndGg7cisrKXtpZih0W3JdLmNvbnRlbnRXaW5kb3c9PT1lLnNvdXJjZSl0W3JdLnN0eWxlLmhlaWdodD1lLmRhdGFbImRhdGF3cmFwcGVyLWhlaWdodCJdW2FdKyJweCJ9fX0pKX0oKTs8L3NjcmlwdD4=

    Sixteen women. Twelve TV and news media personalities. Ten immigrants. A former NFL football player.

    These are among the first 100 people who President-elect Donald Trump has named to various positions for his upcoming administration.

    To examine who will be in Trump’s upcoming administration, the Hearst Television Data Team analyzed a snapshot of the first 100 people Trump announced positions for on this Truth Social account.

    The growing total number of people in Trump’s administration will vary based on how many new positions are created and typical turnover. And, many of the nominees still require Senate confirmation to be official.

    Trump’s administration thus far doesn’t represent the U.S. population in two key areas: race and gender.

    White people were overrepresented among Trump’s first 100 administration names. While only about 58% of the United States is white, they make up 87% of Trump’s first picks.

    Viewing in the app? Click here for the best interactive experience

    Among the first 100, only one Black person has been named — former NFL player and head of the White House Opportunity and Revitalization Council, Scott Turner. Trump tapped Turner as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

    Hispanic and Latino people were also underrepresented, but Trump’s percentage of Asian/Pacific Islander administration members matches the country’s general population.

    Only 16% of Trump’s first administration picks were women — far below the half of the country they represent. That percent matches how many Republican women are in the 119th U.S. Congress but is below the percentage of congressional Democrats who are women, 42%.

    The most common birth state among Trump’s new administration of those that were publicly available is New York — matching where the President-elect was born. California is the second most common.

    Trump’s new team spans at least 25 different states, D.C. and American Samoa, where Tulsi Gabbard — the National Intelligence Director nominee — was born. The Hearst Television Data Team only examined birth states, not current residences of the new Trump administration.

    There are also a sizable number of immigrants and foreign-born people among Trump’s upcoming administration — despite his first-term “Build the Wall” stance and 2024 promise of mass deportations. Recently, Trump said he’s considering a skilled workers immigration program, a shift from his old views against H-1B visas.

    Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk — who was a top political donor to Trump and once had an H-1B visa— was born in South Africa before later immigrating to Canada and then the United States. Musk will co-lead the newly created Department of Government Efficiency.

    In addition to South Africa, Trump’s new administration members come from India, the United Kingdom, Cuba, Ireland, Lebanon and the Netherlands.

    While not an immigrant, Deputy Secretary of State nominee Christopher Landau was born in Spain while his father was stationed there with the Foreign Service.

    As for age, Trump’s first 100 administration members represent a near-perfect bell curve. The youngest is Taylor Budowich — deputy chief of staff for communications and personnel — at 27 years old, and the oldest is Keith Kellogg — special envoy for Ukraine and Russia — at 80 years old.

    Kellogg is the only one among Trump’s initial staff older than the 78-year-old President-elect.

    There are also at least four publicly out LGBTQ+ individuals among Trump’s first 100 administration picks. They include Secretary of Treasury nominee Scott Bessent; Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment nominee Jacob Helberg; presidential envoy for special missions nominee Richard Grenell; and Ambassador to Belgium nominee Bill White.

    That’s close to the 7.6% of American adults who identify as LGBTQ+, according to a 2023 Gallup poll.

    There are also at least 12 former TV stars and news media contributors who have landed top roles in the new Trump administration.

    One of the biggest names is Secretary of Defense nominee Pete Hegseth, who cohosted “Fox & Friends” from 2017-2024. The military veteran recently faced a heated Senate confirmation hearing, where he was asked questions about his qualifications and a sexual assault allegation, which he has denied.

    Below are all the TV personalities and news media contributors among Trump’s first administration picks, where they used to work and the role they were nominated for.

    • Tom Homan: Fox News commentator (border czar)
    • Mike Huckabee: Fox News talk show host (Ambassador to Israel)
    • Pete Hegseth: “Fox & Friends” cohost (Secretary of Defense)
    • Sean Duffy: Fox Business cohost and Fox News contributor (Secretary of Transportation)
    • Mehmet Oz: Host of “The Dr. Oz Show” (CMS Administrator)
    • Matthew Whitaker: CNN contributor (Ambassador to NATO)
    • Sebastian Gorka: NewsMaxTV media host and commentator (Senior Director for Counterterrorism)
    • Marty Makary: The Washington Post and Wall Street Journal contributor (FDA chief)
    • Monica Crowley: Fox News contributor and The Washington Times opinion editor (Ambassador, Assistant Secretary of State and Chief of Protocol)
    • Kimberly Guilfoyle: Fox News co-host (Ambassador to Greece)
    • Kari Lake: KSAZ-TV news anchor (director of Voice of America)
    • Richard Grenell: Fox News contributor (Presidential Envoy for Special Missions)

    Mike/Michael was the most common name among Trump’s first 100 administration picks and also in the 119th Congress — both at about 6%. Only 1% of the U.S. population is named Mike/Michael, according to mynamestats.com.

    There are 26 Mikes/Michaels in the 119th Congress and six named among Trump’s first 100 administration picks.



    As of 2021, Donald Trump’s new administration is composed of a diverse group of individuals in terms of age, race, and gender.

    In terms of age, the members of Trump’s administration range from their late 20s to their 70s, with a mix of seasoned political veterans and younger up-and-coming talent.

    In terms of race, Trump’s administration includes individuals from a variety of backgrounds, including Caucasian, African American, Hispanic, and Asian American. This diversity reflects Trump’s commitment to creating a team that represents the rich tapestry of America’s population.

    In terms of gender, Trump’s administration includes both men and women in key positions of power. While there is still work to be done in terms of achieving gender parity in politics, Trump’s administration is taking steps towards greater inclusivity and representation.

    Overall, Trump’s new administration is a reflection of the changing face of American politics, with a diverse group of individuals coming together to lead the country forward.

    Tags:

    • Donald Trump administration
    • Trump administration members
    • Cabinet members
    • Age, race and gender diversity
    • Trump administration diversity
    • White House staff
    • Political appointments
    • Trump administration demographics
    • Diversity in government
    • Trump administration team members

    #Whos #Donald #Trumps #administration #snapshot #age #race #gender

  • New Title IX guidance from President Biden’s administration threatens to upend school rev-share plans in college sports


    NASHVILLE, Tenn. — As the NCAA Board of Governors entered the third hour of its meeting Thursday night, the phones of college sports leaders within the gathering began buzzing.

    Texts. Emails. Calls.

    While some of college sports’ most powerful executives met here to end this week’s annual NCAA convention, the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights released some jaw-dropping news that stands, if upheld, to completely alter the way many schools plan to pay their athletes in the future revenue-sharing world of college sports.

    The department issued long-awaited guidance related to Title IX: Revenue-sharing payments from schools to athletes must be “proportionately” distributed to men and women athletes, or institutions risk violating Title IX, the 53-year-old federal law requiring universities receiving federal funding to provide equal benefits to women and men athletes.

    “Way to drop a bomb, huh?” whispered one college leader emerging from the meeting room.

    In the final days of President Joe Biden’s administration, the Department of Education’s nine-page guidance released Thursday serves as an 11th-hour salvo at the plans of many power conference schools to distribute a majority of their revenue-share pool — 80% plus — to football and men’s basketball teams.

    As part of the NCAA and power conferences’ landmark House settlement agreement, schools are permitted starting July 1 to distribute at least $20.5 million to athletes annually in an escalating, capped pay system. Most schools are determining their distribution method based on a sport’s revenue generation and/or the back-damage distribution method announced by the House plaintiff lawyers.

    In either case, football and men’s basketball are poised to receive a significant amount of the revenue. According to those with knowledge of the subject, multiple schools are planning to deliver as much as 85% of the $20.5 million revenue pool to their football roster — clearly a violation of the federal Title IX guidance issued Thursday.

    However, the document is not a regulation but only guidance. Even more significant is the impending change in the presidential administration, as a Democrat leader is replaced by a Republican, a major shift that has far-reaching and sweeping impacts for the future of college athletics.

    President-elect Donald Trump, due to be sworn in on Monday, has authority to replace executives at the Department of Education and rescind or change orders and guidance issued by the entity — a common move for party turnover in the executive branch and something that happened when Trump took over for Democratic President Barack Obama in 2016.

    How will an administration change impact all of the changes happening in college sports? Time will tell. (Grant Thomas/Yahoo Sports)How will an administration change impact all of the changes happening in college sports? Time will tell. (Grant Thomas/Yahoo Sports)

    How will an administration change impact all of the changes happening in college sports? Time will tell. (Grant Thomas/Yahoo Sports)

    Trump’s nominee to lead the Department of Education is Linda McMahon, the estranged wife of WWE founder Vince McMahon, and the administrator of the Small Business Administration under Trump from 2017-2019.

    Asked about a new administration overturning the guidance, NCAA president Charlie Baker, a former governor, said, “It’s really hard to tell. That process usually takes a while with all the elements that are associated with turnover in administration. Some stuff happens right away, some stuff happens later and some stuff doesn’t change at all.”

    In the meantime, the guidance has left many school administrators scrambling to understand how the document may impact their revenue-sharing strategy.

    Thursday’s document was chock full of critical lines that may trigger alarm and change in many school plans, if the Trump administration does not rescind it. For instance, the department classifies future revenue payment as “financial assistance,” which “must be made proportionately available to male and female athletes,” the document says.

    “Schools remain responsible for ensuring that they are offering equal athletic opportunities in their athletic programs, including in the NIL context,” the guidance says. “A school may violate Title IX if the school fails to provide equivalent benefits, opportunities and treatment in the components of the school’s athletic program that relate to NIL activities.”

    Hundreds, if not thousands of athletes, have already signed revenue-share agreements with schools, most of them contingent on the settlement’s approval in April. Those agreements feature a payment amount that, perhaps, is now in jeopardy.

    Most of the agreements grant the school non-exclusive rights over the athlete’s name, image and likeness (NIL), permitting businesses and brands to still enter into a relationship with the athletes but prohibiting another school from doing so.

    “We need some time to read, digest and understand it,” said Josh Whitman, the Illinois athletic director who serves on the Board of Governors, the NCAA’s highest-ranking governance body. “This whole thing has been an exercise for us in contingency planning. The world has changed over and over just in the last six months. We’ve been building plans on top of plans for some time now and this is just the most recent example of where we’re going to need to take some new guidance under advisement and figure out what if any changes we need to make to the strategy we developed.”

    The NCAA does not traditionally give guidance to schools related to Title IX, leaving those decisions to campus officials like Linda Livingstone, the Baylor president and chair of the Board of Governors.

    “We’re going to all have to go back (to campus) and have a conversation about it and see what we think the implications are for what we’re doing,” she said Thursday.

    “Well, we all want to read it. We are trying to digest it,” said ACC commissioner Jim Phillips, who is also on the board.

    Thursday’s guidance wasn’t terribly shocking for some.

    For months now, many Title IX experts have publicly voiced their concern over some schools’ lopsided distribution method. One of the nation’s leading Title IX lawyers, Arthur Bryant, told Yahoo Sports in the spring that he expected the distributions to immediately trigger Title IX lawsuits, even if schools used market value to justify the payments or a third-party agency.

    “Title IX is not based on the market. If the market discriminates, the schools cannot,” Bryant said. “The school can’t use a marketing agency to avoid Title IX.”

    Even one of the plaintiff attorneys in the case, Jeffrey Kessler, acknowledged last April that the Title IX issue will need to be resolved in the courtroom.

    Preparing to share revenue directly with athletes, many schools have shuttered their booster-fueled NIL collectives, the entities that for three years now have funded athletic rosters.

    One of the more jarring portions of the guidance is related to these entities, targeting NIL compensation from some third parties, specifically those affiliated with boosters: “The fact that funds are provided by a private source does not relieve a school of its responsibility” for Title IX compliance, it says.

    The guidance drops just two weeks before the deadline for objections to be filed in the House settlement — a landmark agreement in which NCAA schools are paying former athletes (mostly power conference football and men’s basketball players) nearly $2.8 billion in back damages.

    However, the settlement’s second portion permits schools — but doesn’t require them — to share millions of dollars in revenue with athletes in a capped system. Baker does not believe the guidance will impact the timeline of the settlement.

    A final hearing is scheduled for April 7 in the California court of Judge Claudia Wilken, coincidentally the day of the NCAA men’s basketball national championship game.



    The Title IX guidance from President Biden’s administration has sent shockwaves through the college sports world, particularly in regards to revenue-sharing plans. Title IX, a federal law that prohibits sex-based discrimination in education programs or activities, has long been a cornerstone of ensuring gender equity in college sports.

    However, the new guidance from the Biden administration has raised concerns that revenue-sharing plans, which allow schools to distribute profits from sports programs to athletes, could be in jeopardy. These plans have been a hot topic in recent years, as athletes and advocates push for greater compensation and benefits for student-athletes.

    The potential impact of this new guidance on revenue-sharing plans has sparked debate among college sports officials, athletes, and advocates. Some argue that these plans are essential for providing fair compensation to student-athletes, while others believe that they could inadvertently exacerbate gender disparities in college sports.

    As schools grapple with the implications of this new guidance, one thing is clear: the landscape of college sports could be facing significant changes in the near future. Stay tuned for updates on how schools and athletes navigate these new challenges in the world of college athletics.

    Tags:

    1. Title IX guidance
    2. President Biden administration
    3. College sports
    4. Revenue sharing
    5. School sports programs
    6. Title IX regulations
    7. NCAA compliance
    8. Student athlete compensation
    9. Federal guidelines
    10. Athletic department funding.

    #Title #guidance #President #Bidens #administration #threatens #upend #school #revshare #plans #college #sports

  • New Administration to Take Over in Challenging Era for the Pentagon


    The next defense secretary will face myriad major challenges: the war in Ukraine, turmoil in the Middle East and rising military threat from China. And then there’s what lies closer to home: possibly deploying U.S. troops to the southwestern border to address immigration concerns, and revitalizing America’s military industrial base to confront global adversaries.

    President-elect Donald J. Trump has said little about how he would settle the conflict. But Vice President-elect JD Vance has outlined a plan that would allow the Russians to keep the Ukrainian territory that their forces have seized.

    Keith Kellogg, Mr. Trump’s special envoy for Ukraine, said last week that his boss would try to broker a deal with Moscow within 100 days of his inauguration. Critics fear a hasty deal could lock in Russia’s territorial gains in Ukraine — about 20 percent of the country.

    One of the biggest unknowns for Ukraine is whether the Trump administration and Europe will provide any kind of security guarantees to try to prevent Russia from moving to take more territory.

    “A Russian military victory in Ukraine would be somewhat akin to the Biden administration’s catastrophe in Afghanistan in its first year,” said Seth G. Jones, a senior vice president with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank.

    What will happen to the 2,000 U.S. troops helping to fight the Islamic State in northeast Syria?

    In late 2018, Mr. Trump ordered all U.S. forces to abandon that mission, prompting Jim Mattis to resign as defense secretary in protest. A subsequent compromise reversed that decision, leaving a smaller U.S. force in a smaller corner of that part of Syria.

    The turmoil in Syria after the collapse last month of President Bashar al-Assad’s government to an Islamist coalition led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, and the Islamic State-inspired attack in New Orleans on New Year’s Day, make any immediate troop changes less likely, but the long-term future is uncertain.

    Meantime, negotiators for both President Biden and Mr. Trump are working together to strike a deal before Inauguration Day to reach a cease-fire in Gaza that would also release some of the remaining hostages.

    If that effort fails, however, the next defense secretary could play a role in trying to influence Israel’s air campaign and ground attacks against remaining Hamas fighters in Gaza.

    Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III, a retired four-star Army general, repeatedly warned Israel that it could face “strategic defeat” that would leave the country less secure if it did not do more to protect civilians.

    Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III visited the Indo-Pacific region 13 times during his four-year tenure. The main reason? China.

    Mr. Austin’s successor is also likely to rack up the miles flying to Asia to oversee a growing U.S. military presence in the region and to shore up alliances to counter a rising Chinese military threat.

    China’s navy “continues to develop into a global force, gradually extending its operational reach beyond East Asia,” the Defense Department said last month in an annual report assessing Beijing’s military strength.

    Much of China’s military planning is focused on Taiwan, a self-governed island democracy that Beijing claims as its territory. Leaders in Beijing have long said that they want to peacefully absorb Taiwan into China, but they also say they may resort to war. China has been stepping up naval and air force forays near Taiwan to increase its pressure on the island.

    Look for the new Trump administration to build on President Biden’s efforts to expand American security partnerships in the region, making deals that would allow U.S. forces to disperse across small islands and strike China with anti-ship weapons and cruise missiles.



    The Pentagon is set to welcome a new administration as it navigates through a challenging era filled with complex geopolitical threats and evolving technologies. The incoming leaders will be tasked with addressing a wide range of issues, from modernizing the military to countering cyber threats and maintaining alliances with key partners.

    This transition comes at a crucial time for the Pentagon, as it faces growing competition from near-peer adversaries like China and Russia, as well as non-state actors like terrorist organizations. The need for a strong and agile defense posture has never been greater, and the new administration will need to hit the ground running to ensure that the United States remains secure and prepared for any potential threats.

    Key priorities for the new administration will include investing in emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and cybersecurity, bolstering the military’s readiness and capabilities, and strengthening partnerships with allies and international organizations. Additionally, they will need to address issues such as climate change, global health security, and the rise of disinformation and propaganda in the digital age.

    As the Pentagon prepares for this transition, all eyes will be on the incoming leadership to see how they will tackle these challenges and steer the military towards a more secure and prosperous future. Stay tuned for updates on the new administration’s plans and priorities as they take over the helm at the Pentagon.

    Tags:

    1. Pentagon leadership change
    2. New administration defense challenges
    3. Defense department transition
    4. Pentagon administration update
    5. Government defense policy shift
    6. National security leadership turnover
    7. Pentagon strategic planning
    8. Defense department transition team
    9. Pentagon administration update
    10. Defense secretary appointment

    #Administration #Challenging #Era #Pentagon

  • Biden’s education secretary made big changes. Here’s what the Trump administration could change next.


    President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration next week will mean sweeping changes in the way the federal government handles issues from foreign policy to education — and Education Secretary Miguel Cardona is already rebutting what he’s expecting to see from his successor.

    In an interview with NBC News this week, Cardona, who served in President Joe Biden’s Cabinet for four years, said he is both proud of his efforts to protect the changes implemented under his watch and concerned about how the second Trump administration will handle education issues, including Trump’s stated goal of eliminating the Department of Education altogether.

    Cardona said eliminating the department would widen disparities between students and disproportionately hurt the most vulnerable populations.

    “The federal Department of Education at its core is a civil rights agency that ensures that students in protected classes, in particular, get their rights, and that students are getting the support that a public education should provide,” Cardona said. “It would create a wider gap between the haves and have nots.”

    Trump has repeatedly accused Democrats of politicizing schools and has promised to cut funding to some schools. He has said, “On day one, I will sign a new executive order to cut federal funding for any school pushing critical race theory, transgender insanity and other inappropriate racial, sexual or political content on our children.”

    Cardona said Trump’s plans would “deteriorate the fabric of our country.”

    Brian Hughes, a spokesman for the Trump transition team, pushed back on Cardona’s assertion and said the “best movements” that have made the “most positive impact” on the nation’s education systems are happening at the local and state levels.

    “Only a liberal bureaucratic mindset would imagine that government would be the solution for our education system,” Hughes said. “So I think with the president and with Linda McMahon, when she’s confirmed, what you’ll see is a department that recognizes the need to put more power and economic freedom into the core mission of educating our kids at the local and state level. And if you do that, if you really bring a reform mind and choice back to local communities, it will have the exact opposite of disparity. It will actually bring more equity and equal opportunity of education to communities, particularly underserved communities.”

    The matter of the department’s existence is not the only looming education fight. When asked how he has sought to protect some of the Biden administration’s work at the department beyond his impending departure, Cardona said he was proud of streamlining the public service loan forgiveness program. 

    “We went from 7,000 people in the first Trump administration that got debt relief — these are teachers and nurses and firefighters, police officers — now we have over a million,” Cardona said. “So the way we changed that should continue to grow — unless, you know, the next administration seeks to destroy that relief that was passed in bipartisan fashion.”

    But some critics of Cardona are eyeing the separate student loans deferment programs passed under Biden as places ripe for immediate change under Trump.

    Frederick Hess, director of education policy at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute, said he welcomes the change in administration and wants to see “student loans back to the deal it’s supposed to be between borrowers and taxpayers.”

    He also said he wanted to see changes to Free Application for Federal Student Aid, the form known as FAFSA, after the department endured a botched redesign of the process, disrupting decision timelines for current and prospective college students and schools across the country.

    Hess also criticized Cardona’s leadership and said he “politicized the department in small and unnecessary ways.” It’s a charge Cardona denies but one that Republicans have effectively made against Democrats at the ballot box.

    “It’s like a corporate turnaround. You got to, like, fix all the bad stuff before you get to do what you want to do,” Hess said, adding that while he doesn’t think there will be the support to eliminate the Department of Education, he would be fine with it going away.

    “The federal government can do education, higher ed, K-12, whether or not there’s a department,” Hess said. “Whether or not there’s a website that says you’re now visiting the U.S. Department of Education is not what really matters when it comes to what Washington is doing, as far as schools or colleges. What really matters is what kinds of rules we’re writing, what kinds of programs exist, how much money is being spent. The ‘abolish the department’ debate is less helpful when people kind of focus on it, rather than those more specific, more important pieces.”

    Trump has nominated Linda McMahon, a former World Wrestling Entertainment executive who served in the first Trump administration as head of the Small Business Administration, as his pick to lead the Education Department. 

    “I don’t know that McMahon is well equipped to do it. I don’t know her. We’ll see, in part, through her confirmation process,” Hess said. “But her background in business and the small business administration certainly suggests to me that she might have the right skills.”

    Hess added that he hopes to see legislative changes by Congress that will do things like bolster school choice initiatives, as well as executive orders by Trump on issues like combating antisemitism and discrimination on college campuses. Still, he acknowledged that some of Cardona’s biggest actions can’t be undone, including the funding he has given out for state initiatives as well as millions of dollars in student loan forgiveness.

    Meanwhile, Derrell Bradford, president of 50CAN, a nonprofit that supports school choice policies like charter schools and vouchers, said he hopes to see the Department of Education under Trump do things like making it easier for people to access federal funds to start charter schools and supporting career and technical education programs along with college and career apprenticeships initiatives. He added that he hopes the country can come together despite the partisanship that has been infused in education debates. 

    “Education is political and so at some level is partisan. But a family’s love for their kids, and their desire to have them be the best version of themselves is apolitical,” Bradford said. “I would also like to see the department spend more time highlighting the things that states are doing together, regardless of who’s in charge of them, as a way to show that that kind of collaboration is still possible.”



    Biden’s education secretary made big changes. Here’s what the Trump administration could change next.

    Education Secretary Miguel Cardona has wasted no time in implementing significant changes to the education system since taking office. From the cancellation of student loan debt to increased funding for historically marginalized schools, Cardona’s swift actions have already had a profound impact on the education landscape.

    But as Cardona continues to make waves with his progressive policies, many are wondering what the Trump administration could change next if they were to regain power. With a focus on school choice and deregulation, here are a few potential changes that could be on the horizon:

    1. Expansion of school choice options: The Trump administration was a strong advocate for school choice, pushing for policies that would allow students to use public funds to attend private or charter schools. If they were to return to power, we could see a significant expansion of school choice options, potentially leading to increased competition and innovation in the education system.

    2. Rollback of Title IX protections: The Trump administration rolled back Obama-era Title IX protections, making it harder for survivors of sexual assault to seek justice on college campuses. If they were to regain power, we could see further rollbacks of Title IX protections, potentially putting students at risk of sexual violence.

    3. Increased emphasis on standardized testing: The Trump administration was a staunch supporter of standardized testing, believing it to be a key measure of student achievement. If they were to return to power, we could see a renewed emphasis on standardized testing, potentially leading to increased pressure on students and teachers to perform well on these assessments.

    While the future of education policy remains uncertain, one thing is clear: the Trump administration could make significant changes if they were to regain power. It will be important for advocates and policymakers to closely monitor these potential changes and continue to fight for a more equitable and just education system for all students.

    Tags:

    Biden’s education secretary, Trump administration, education policy, Department of Education, educational reforms, education secretary, Biden administration, Trump’s education agenda, education changes, education policies, education reform initiatives, education updates, Trump administration’s education plans

    #Bidens #education #secretary #big #Heres #Trump #administration #change

  • Biden-Harris Administration Announces Final Student Loan Forgiveness and Borrower Assistance Actions


    Total Approved Student Debt Relief Reached Almost $189 Billion for 5.3 Million Borrowers

    The Biden-Harris Administration today announced its final round of student loan forgiveness, approving more than $600 million for 4,550 borrowers through the Income-Based Repayment (IBR) Plan and 4,100 individual borrower defense approvals. The Administration leaves office having approved a cumulative $188.8 billion in forgiveness for 5.3 million borrowers across 33 executive actions. The U.S. Department of Education (Department) today also announced that it has completed the income-driven repayment payment count adjustment and that borrowers will now be able to see their income-driven repayment counters when they log into their accounts on StudentAid.gov. Finally, the Department took additional actions that will allow students who attended certain schools that have since closed to qualify for student loan discharges. 

    “Four years ago, President Biden made a promise to fix a broken student loan system. We rolled up our sleeves and, together, we fixed existing programs that had failed to deliver the relief they promised, took bold action on behalf of borrowers who had been cheated by their institutions, and brought financial breathing room to hardworking Americans—including public servants and borrowers with disabilities. Thanks to our relentless, unapologetic efforts, millions of Americans are approved for student loan forgiveness,” said U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona. “I’m incredibly proud of the Biden-Harris Administration’s historic achievements in making the life-changing potential of higher education more affordable and accessible for more people.” 

    From Day One the Biden-Harris Administration took steps to rethink, restore, and revitalize targeted relief programs that entitle borrowers to relief under the Higher Education Act but that failed to live up to their promises. Through a combination of executive actions and regulatory improvements, the Biden-Harris Administration produced the following results for borrowers: 

    Fixed longstanding problems with Income-Driven Repayment (IDR). The Administration has approved 1.45 million borrowers for $57.1 billion in loan relief, including $600 million for 4,550 borrowers announced today for IBR forgiveness. 

    IDR plans help keep payments manageable for borrowers and have provided a path to forgiveness after an extended period. These plans started in the early 1990s, but prior to the Biden-Harris Administration taking office, just 50 borrowers had ever had their loans forgiven. The Administration corrected longstanding failures to accurately track borrower progress toward forgiveness and addressed past instances of forbearance steering whereby servicers inappropriately advised borrowers to postpone payments for extended periods of time. These totals also include borrowers who received forgiveness under the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan prior to court orders halting forgiveness under the SAVE plan. 

    Today, the Department also announced the completion of the IDR payment count adjustment, correcting eligible payment counts. While the payment count adjustment is now complete, borrowers who were affected by certain servicer transitions in 2024 may see one or two additional months credited in the coming weeks. The Department is also launching the ability for borrowers to track their IDR progress on StudentAid.gov. Borrowers can now log in to their accounts and see their total IDR payment count and a month-by-month breakdown of progress.   

    Restored the promise of Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF). The Administration has approved 1,069,000 borrowers for $78.5 billion in forgiveness.  

    The PSLF Program provides critical support to teachers, service members, social workers, and others engaged in public service. But prior to this Administration taking office, just 7,000 borrowers had received forgiveness and the overwhelming majority of borrowers who applied had their applications denied. The Biden-Harris Administration fixed this program by pursuing regulatory improvements, correcting long-standing issues with tracking progress toward forgiveness and misuse of forbearances, and implementing the limited PSLF waiver to avoid harm from the pandemic. 

    Automated discharges and simplified eligibility criteria for borrowers with a total and permanent disability. The Administration has approved 633,000 borrowers for $18.7 billion in loan relief. 

    Borrowers who are totally and permanently disabled may be eligible for a total and permanent disability (TPD) discharge. The Biden-Harris Administration changed regulations to automatically forgive loans for eligible borrowers based upon a data match with the Social Security Administration (SSA). This helped hundreds of thousands of borrowers who were eligible for relief but hadn’t managed to navigate paperwork requirements. The Department also made it easier for borrowers to qualify for relief based upon SSA determinations, made it easier to complete the TPD application, and eliminated provisions that had caused many borrowers to have their loans reinstated. 

    Delivered long-awaited help to borrowers ripped off by their institutions, whose schools closed, or through related court settlements. The Administration has approved just under 2 million borrowers for $34.5 billion in loan relief.  

    For years, students had sought relief from the Department through borrower defense to repayment—a provision that allows borrowers to have their loans forgiven if their college engaged in misconduct related to the borrowers’ loans. The Department delivered long-awaited relief to borrowers who attended some of the most notoriously predatory institutions to ever participate in the federal financial aid programs. This included approving for discharge all remaining outstanding loans from Corinthian Colleges, as well as group discharges for ITT Technical Institute, the Art Institutes, Westwood College, Ashford University, and others. The Department also settled a long-running class action lawsuit stemming from allegations of inaction and the issuance of form denials, allowing it to begin the first sustained denials of non-meritorious claims. 

    Today, the Department also approved 4,100 additional individual borrower defense applications for borrowers who attended DeVry University, based upon findings announced in February 2022.  

    “For decades, the federal government promised to help people who couldn’t afford their student loans because they were in public service, had disabilities, were cheated by their college, or who had completed decades of payments. But it rarely kept those promises until now,” said U.S. Under Secretary of Education James Kvaal. “These permanent reforms have already helped more 5 million borrowers, and many more borrowers will continue to benefit.” 

    The table below compares the progress made by the Biden-Harris Administration in these key discharge areas compared to other administrations. 

      Borrowers approved for forgiveness 
      Prior Administrations  Biden-Harris Administration 
    Borrower Defense (Since 2015)  53,500  1,767,000* 
    Public Service Loan Forgiveness (Since 2017)  7,000  1,069,000 
    Income-Driven Repayment (all-time)  50  1,454,000 
    Total and Permanent Disability (Since 2017)  604,000  633,000 

    * Includes 107,000 borrowers and $1.25 billion captured by an extension of the closed-school lookback window at ITT Technical Institute.  

    Additional actions related to closed school discharges 

    The Department today also announced additional actions that will make more borrowers eligible for a closed school loan discharge. Generally, a borrower qualifies for a closed school discharge if they did not complete their program and were either still enrolled when the school closed or left without graduating within 120 days before it closed. . However, the Department has determined that several schools closed under exceptional circumstances that merit allowing borrowers who did complete and were enrolled in the school more than 120 days prior to the closure to qualify for a closed school discharge. justify extending the look-back window beyond the applicable 120 or 180 days–allowing additional borrowers to qualify for a closed school discharge. Generally, eligible borrowers will have to apply for these discharges, but the Secretary has directed Federal Student Aid to make borrowers aware of their eligibility, and to pursue automatic discharges for those affected by closures that took place between 2013 and 2020 and who did not enroll elsewhere within three years of their school closing. 

    These adjusted look-back windows are: 

    • To May 6, 2015, for all campuses owned at the time by the Career Education Corporation (CEC), which have since closed. That is the day CEC announced it would close or sell all campuses except for two brands. This affected the Art Institutes, Le Cordon Bleu, Brooks Institute, Missouri College, Briarcliffe College, and Sanford-Brown. 
    • To December 16, 2016, for campuses owned by the Education Corporation of America (ECA) on that date that closed. ECA operated Virginia College, Brightwood College, EcoTech, and Golf Academies and started on the path to closure after its accreditation agency lost federal recognition and ECA could not obtain accreditation elsewhere. 
    • To October 17, 2017 for all campuses owned or sold on that date by the Education Management Corporation (EDMC) and that later closed. That is the day EDMC sold substantially all of its assets to Dream Center Educational Holdings. The decision affects borrowers who attended the Art Institutes, including the Miami International University of Art & Design and Argosy University.  
    • To April 23, 2021, for Bay State College. That is the day this Massachusetts-based college began to face significant accreditation challenges, which eventually led to the school losing accreditation and closing in August 2023. 

    Borrowers who want more information about closed school discharge, including how to apply, can visit StudentAid.gov/closedschool

    A state-by-state breakdown of various forms of student debt relief approved by the Biden-Harris Administration is available here

     



    The Biden-Harris Administration has just announced their final student loan forgiveness and borrower assistance actions, providing relief to millions of Americans struggling with student debt.

    Under the new plan, borrowers who have been making payments on their federal student loans for at least 20 years will have their remaining debt forgiven. This move is expected to benefit over 10 million borrowers, providing much-needed financial relief to those who have been burdened by student loan debt for decades.

    Additionally, the administration has announced an expansion of the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, which will now allow more borrowers working in public service professions to have their loans forgiven after just 10 years of payments.

    Furthermore, the administration is implementing new measures to make it easier for borrowers to access and navigate income-driven repayment plans, ensuring that those struggling financially have access to affordable repayment options.

    These actions are a significant step towards addressing the student debt crisis in America and providing relief to those who have been weighed down by their loans for years. The Biden-Harris Administration is committed to helping borrowers achieve financial stability and move forward with their lives without the burden of overwhelming student debt.

    Tags:

    • Biden-Harris Administration
    • Student Loan Forgiveness
    • Borrower Assistance
    • Student Loan Relief
    • Education Policy
    • Student Loan Repayment
    • Federal Student Aid
    • Financial Assistance
    • Higher Education
    • Biden Administration Initiatives

    #BidenHarris #Administration #Announces #Final #Student #Loan #Forgiveness #Borrower #Assistance #Actions

  • Biden Administration Creates Final Limits for Oil Drillers in Alaska


    The Biden administration announced new protections for 1.3 million acres in the North Slope of Alaska, a final effort to shield it from oil companies eager to drill in the ecologically sensitive Arctic environment.

    President-elect Donald J. Trump returns to the White House on Monday, and he has pledged to grant fossil fuel companies broad access to American land and federal waters. The new protections, which take effect immediately, create a legal hurdle that could slow down, though probably not stop, efforts by the Trump administration to expand drilling in part of the North Slope known as the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.

    The reserve is the largest expanse of undisturbed land in the United States. It is an important nesting ground for migratory birds, home to caribou, grizzly bears and wolverines and is an important habitat for polar bears. It also contains large reserves of oil and gas and was created in 1923 as a source of oil for the Navy. Some exploratory drilling took place over the decades but it was largely left untouched until the late 1990s.

    Laura Daniel-Davis, the acting deputy secretary of the Interior Department, said that, under the new policy, the Bureau of Land Management would have to explain how drilling in the protected areas would affect subsistence hunting and fishing in the vast wilderness.

    The agency also is proposing about three million acres of new or expanded “special areas,” regions that have ecological significance or are used for subsistence hunting and gathering by Alaska Natives. The decisions were based on 88,000 comments from people in North Slope communities, she said.

    “I can’t speculate what the future might hold with regard to a new team,” Ms. Daniel-Davis said of the Trump administration. But she said the Interior Department was obliged to act after conducting extensive consultations.

    Some of the newly protected and proposed areas are close to the Willow oil project, led by ConocoPhillips.

    Environmental groups applauded the move. Erik Grafe, an attorney for Earthjustice, said the new measures “followed the science that clearly shows these areas’ irreplaceable values require maximum protection against harm from oil drilling.”

    Republican lawmakers said they would try to reverse the Biden administration’s actions. They accused the Interior Department of laying the groundwork for environmental groups to challenge the Trump administration’s plans to increase drilling.

    The Biden administration had already banned this drilling in about 13 million acres of the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska. That amounts to about half of the entire reserve.

    It also blocked a proposed industrial road needed to mine copper in the middle of the state, and barred drilling in Alaska waters, including the Northern Bering Sea.

    “I don’t think that is what Alaska wants,” Representative Bruce Westerman, Republican of Arkansas and the chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, said. He said Republicans would seek to mandate drilling leases in Alaska waters and on the North Slope as lawmakers wrote a budget bill in the coming weeks.

    Senator Dan Sullivan, Republican of Alaska, called the move a “last gasp of a failed administration trying to crush Alaska and silence the voices of the Inupiat people who actually live on the North Slope.”



    The Biden Administration has announced final limits for oil drillers in Alaska, marking a significant step towards protecting the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and other sensitive ecosystems in the region.

    These new limits, which were proposed earlier this year, will restrict drilling in certain areas of Alaska and impose stricter regulations on oil and gas companies operating in the region. The administration has emphasized the need to balance energy development with environmental conservation, and these limits aim to achieve that balance.

    Environmental groups have praised the Biden Administration for taking action to protect Alaska’s pristine wilderness and wildlife, while industry groups have expressed concerns about the impact these limits will have on their operations.

    Overall, the final limits for oil drillers in Alaska represent a major milestone in the administration’s efforts to address climate change and protect the environment for future generations.

    Tags:

    • Biden administration
    • Oil drillers
    • Alaska
    • Final limits
    • Environmental regulations
    • Energy policy
    • Arctic drilling
    • Oil and gas industry
    • Conservation efforts
    • Federal restrictions

    #Biden #Administration #Creates #Final #Limits #Oil #Drillers #Alaska

  • Biden leaves TikTok ban decision to Trump administration


    President Joe Biden won’t enforce a ban on the social media app TikTok that is set to take effect a day before he leaves office on Monday, a U.S. official said Thursday, leaving its fate in the hands of President-elect Donald Trump.Congress last year, in a law signed by Biden, required that TikTok’s China-based parent company ByteDance divest the company by Jan. 19, a day before the presidential inauguration. The official said the outgoing administration was leaving the implementation of the law — and the potential enforcement of the ban — to Trump.The official spoke on condition of anonymity in order to discuss internal Biden administration thinking.Trump, who once called to ban the app, has since pledged to keep it available in the U.S., though his transition team has not said how they intend to accomplish that.TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew is expected to attend Trump’s inauguration and be granted a prime seating location on the dais as the president-elect’s national security adviser signals that the incoming administration may take steps to “keep TikTok from going dark.”Incoming national security adviser Mike Waltz on Thursday told Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends” that the federal law that could ban TikTok by Sunday also “allows for an extension as long as a viable deal is on the table.”The push to save TikTok, much like the move to ban it in the U.S., has crossed partisan lines. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said he spoke with Biden on Thursday to advocate for extending the deadline to ban TikTok.“It’s clear that more time is needed to find an American buyer and not disrupt the lives and livelihoods of millions of Americans, of so many influencers who have built up a good network of followers,” Schumer said Thursday on the Senate floor.Democrats had tried on Wednesday to pass legislation that would have extended the deadline, but Republican Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas blocked it. Cotton, chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said that TikTok has had ample time to find a buyer.“TikTok is a Chinese Communist spy app that addicts our kids, harvests their data, targets them with harmful and manipulative content, and spreads communist propaganda,” Cotton said.TikTok CEO’s is expected to be seated on the dais for the inauguration along with tech billionaires Elon Musk, who is CEO of SpaceX, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, according to two people with the matter. The people spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal planning.Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a legal challenge to the statute brought by TikTok, its China-based parent company ByteDance, and users of the app. The Justices seemed likely to uphold the law, which requires ByteDance to divest TikTok on national security grounds or face a ban in one of its biggest markets.“If the Supreme Court comes out with a ruling in favor of the law, President Trump has been very clear: Number one, TikTok is a great platform that many Americans use and has been great for his campaign and getting his message out. But number two, he’s going to protect their data,” Waltz said on Wednesday.“He’s a deal maker. I don’t want to get ahead of our executive orders, but we’re going to create this space to put that deal in place,” he added.Separately on Wednesday, Pam Bondi, Trump’s pick for attorney general, dodged a question during a Senate hearing on whether she’d uphold a TikTok ban.Trump has reversed his position on the popular app, having tried to ban it during his first term in office over national security concerns. He joined TikTok during his 2024 presidential campaign and his team used it to connect with younger voters, especially male voters, by pushing content that was often macho and aimed at going viral. He pledged to “save TikTok” during the campaign and has credited the platform with helping him win more youth votes.

    President Joe Biden won’t enforce a ban on the social media app TikTok that is set to take effect a day before he leaves office on Monday, a U.S. official said Thursday, leaving its fate in the hands of President-elect Donald Trump.

    Congress last year, in a law signed by Biden, required that TikTok’s China-based parent company ByteDance divest the company by Jan. 19, a day before the presidential inauguration. The official said the outgoing administration was leaving the implementation of the law — and the potential enforcement of the ban — to Trump.

    The official spoke on condition of anonymity in order to discuss internal Biden administration thinking.

    Trump, who once called to ban the app, has since pledged to keep it available in the U.S., though his transition team has not said how they intend to accomplish that.

    TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew is expected to attend Trump’s inauguration and be granted a prime seating location on the dais as the president-elect’s national security adviser signals that the incoming administration may take steps to “keep TikTok from going dark.”

    Incoming national security adviser Mike Waltz on Thursday told Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends” that the federal law that could ban TikTok by Sunday also “allows for an extension as long as a viable deal is on the table.”

    The push to save TikTok, much like the move to ban it in the U.S., has crossed partisan lines. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said he spoke with Biden on Thursday to advocate for extending the deadline to ban TikTok.

    “It’s clear that more time is needed to find an American buyer and not disrupt the lives and livelihoods of millions of Americans, of so many influencers who have built up a good network of followers,” Schumer said Thursday on the Senate floor.

    Democrats had tried on Wednesday to pass legislation that would have extended the deadline, but Republican Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas blocked it. Cotton, chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said that TikTok has had ample time to find a buyer.

    “TikTok is a Chinese Communist spy app that addicts our kids, harvests their data, targets them with harmful and manipulative content, and spreads communist propaganda,” Cotton said.

    TikTok CEO’s is expected to be seated on the dais for the inauguration along with tech billionaires Elon Musk, who is CEO of SpaceX, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, according to two people with the matter. The people spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal planning.

    Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a legal challenge to the statute brought by TikTok, its China-based parent company ByteDance, and users of the app. The Justices seemed likely to uphold the law, which requires ByteDance to divest TikTok on national security grounds or face a ban in one of its biggest markets.

    “If the Supreme Court comes out with a ruling in favor of the law, President Trump has been very clear: Number one, TikTok is a great platform that many Americans use and has been great for his campaign and getting his message out. But number two, he’s going to protect their data,” Waltz said on Wednesday.

    “He’s a deal maker. I don’t want to get ahead of our executive orders, but we’re going to create this space to put that deal in place,” he added.

    Separately on Wednesday, Pam Bondi, Trump’s pick for attorney general, dodged a question during a Senate hearing on whether she’d uphold a TikTok ban.

    Trump has reversed his position on the popular app, having tried to ban it during his first term in office over national security concerns. He joined TikTok during his 2024 presidential campaign and his team used it to connect with younger voters, especially male voters, by pushing content that was often macho and aimed at going viral. He pledged to “save TikTok” during the campaign and has credited the platform with helping him win more youth votes.



    In a surprising twist, President-elect Joe Biden has announced that he will not make a decision on the TikTok ban and will instead leave it up to the Trump administration to handle.

    Many were expecting Biden to reverse the ban on the popular social media app, which has been a source of controversy and tension between the US and China. However, Biden’s decision to defer to the current administration has left many scratching their heads.

    Some speculate that this move is an attempt to avoid taking a stance on a divisive issue and instead focus on more pressing matters facing the country. Others believe that Biden may be trying to maintain a sense of continuity and stability in the transition of power.

    Regardless of the reasoning behind Biden’s decision, it is clear that the fate of TikTok remains uncertain. Will the Trump administration move forward with the ban, or will they reconsider in light of Biden’s hands-off approach? Only time will tell.

    Tags:

    1. Biden administration
    2. TikTok ban
    3. Trump administration
    4. Social media
    5. Technology
    6. US politics
    7. Internet security
    8. Digital policy
    9. Executive order
    10. Online privacy.

    #Biden #leaves #TikTok #ban #decision #Trump #administration

Chat Icon