Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: Americas
Where to Watch: Inter Miami CF The Americas Preseason Tour Matches in Latin America
As Inter Miami CF carries on with the Club’s The America’s Preseason Tour ahead of the 2025 season, below we present to fans worldwide how they can follow along the team’s thrilling matchups in Latin America.
Inter Miami CF Preseason Latin America Matches Broadcast Schedule:
Inter Miami CF vs. Club Universitario de Deportes – Wednesday, Jan. 29 (8 p.m. ET and local Peru time) | Club Universitario de Deportes | Estadio Monumental | Lima, Peru
- U.S. and Canada: InterMiamiCF.com
- Perú Local Broadcast: Latina Televisión, Gol TV
- Rest of World: OneFootball (App)
- Tickets: Tickets for the match are available HERE.
Inter Miami CF vs. Sporting San Miguelito – Sunday, Feb. 2 (5 p.m. ET and local Panama time) | Sporting San Miguelito | Estadio Rommel Fernández Gutiérrez | Panama City, Panama
- U.S. and Canada: InterMiamiCF.com
- Panamá Local Broadcast: SerTV, TV MAX, RPC
- Rest of World: OneFootball (App)
- Tickets: Tickets for the match are available HERE.
Inter Miami CF vs. Club Olimpia Deportivo – Saturday, Feb. 8 (8 p.m. ET/7 p.m. Honduras local time) | Club Olimpia Deportivo | Estadio Olímpico Metropolitano | San Pedro Sula, Honduras
- U.S. and Canada: InterMiamiCF.com
- Honduras Local Broadcast: TELEVICENTRO
- Rest of World: OneFootball (App)
- Tickets: Tickets for the match are available HERE.
If you’re a fan of Inter Miami CF and want to catch their preseason tour matches in Latin America, you’re in luck! Here’s a rundown of where you can watch the team in action:– In Mexico: Inter Miami CF will be playing two matches in Mexico during their preseason tour. You can catch the games on ESPN Deportes or TUDN, as well as on streaming platforms like ESPN+ or fuboTV.
– In Brazil: Inter Miami CF will be facing off against local teams in Brazil. The matches will likely be broadcast on SporTV or Premiere FC, so make sure to check your local listings for specific channels and times.
– In Argentina: If you’re in Argentina, you can catch Inter Miami CF’s preseason tour matches on TyC Sports or DirecTV Sports. You can also stream the games on the TyC Sports Play app.
– In Colombia: Inter Miami CF will be playing a match in Colombia during their preseason tour. You can watch the game on Win Sports or RCN, as well as on streaming platforms like Fanatiz.
Wherever you are in Latin America, there are plenty of options to watch Inter Miami CF’s preseason tour matches. So grab your jersey, settle in, and cheer on your favorite team as they prepare for the upcoming season!
Tags:
Inter Miami CF, The Americas Preseason Tour, Latin America, Inter Miami CF tour matches, watch Inter Miami CF matches in Latin America, Inter Miami CF preseason matches, Inter Miami CF tour schedule, Inter Miami CF Latin America tour dates, Inter Miami CF match locations, Inter Miami CF live stream, Inter Miami CF broadcast, Inter Miami CF TV coverage, Inter Miami CF match venues
#Watch #Inter #Miami #Americas #Preseason #Tour #Matches #Latin #AmericaOpinion | The Dubious History of America’s Most Famous Monarchist
Never mind that the actual substance of his ideas leaves much to be desired. Take his illuminating interview with The Times, in which he gives readers a crash course in his overall political vision. He makes a studied effort to appear as learned and erudite as possible. But linger just a little on his answers and you’ll see the extent to which they’re underproofed and overbaked.
Consider his claim that “effective government” requires a strongman. He uses consumer goods as evidence:
When I ask people to answer that question, I ask them to look around the room and point out everything in the room that was made by a monarchy, because these things that we call companies are actually little monarchies. You’re looking around, and you see, for example, a laptop, and that laptop was made by Apple, which is a monarchy.
If Yarvin believes that Apple is a monarchy, he may not actually understand what a monarchy is. Tim Cook is not the sovereign of the Apple computing company; he serves at the pleasure of its board. Moreover, to say the laptop was “made by Apple” is to elide the extent to which product development, like any other form of high-level industrial production, is a collective and collaborative process. Your MacBook is not forged by a singular will. The idea that you can “thank monarchy” for an iPhone is ridiculous, and the idea that this could be a political prognosis is absurd.
More egregious in the interview are the moments when Yarvin gets basic history wrong in an attempt to demonstrate the sophistication of his views. He answers the first question of the exchange — “Why is democracy so bad?” — with what he thinks is a pointed rejoinder:
You’ve probably heard of a man named Franklin Delano Roosevelt. I do a speech sometimes where I’ll just read the last 10 paragraphs of F.D.R.’s first Inaugural Address, in which he essentially says, hey, Congress, give me absolute power, or I’ll take it anyway. So did F.D.R. actually take that level of power? Yeah, he did.
This is flatly untrue. You can read Roosevelt’s first Inaugural Address to see for yourself. There is no threat to seize power. “I am prepared under my constitutional duty to recommend the measures that a stricken nation in the midst of a stricken world may require,” Roosevelt said. “These measures, or such other measures as the Congress may build out of its experience and wisdom, I shall seek, within my constitutional authority, to bring to speedy adoption.”
If Congress failed to act, Roosevelt did not say that he would do it himself and seize absolute power. He said that he would ask Congress to grant him “broad executive power” to “wage a war against the emergency, as great as the power that would be given to me if we were in fact invaded by a foreign foe.” But even this, Roosevelt emphasized, would be done within the bounds of the Constitution and in fidelity to the principles of American democracy.
One of Roosevelt’s most essential qualities, in fact, was his belief in the superiority of representative government. It was part of the engine of his ambition and motivated him to try everything under the sun to arrest the crisis of the Depression and restore the public’s faith in a system that was teetering on the edge of collapse and facing pressure from authoritarians at home and abroad. To read Roosevelt as anything other than a small-d democrat is to demonstrate a fundamental ignorance of his life and career.
In a country founded on principles of democracy and independence, it may come as a surprise to many that America has had its fair share of monarchists throughout history. One of the most famous of these individuals was none other than Aaron Burr, the third Vice President of the United States.Burr is best known for his infamous duel with Alexander Hamilton, which ultimately resulted in Hamilton’s death. However, his monarchist leanings are less well-known but equally controversial. Burr was a firm believer in a strong central government and even advocated for the establishment of a monarchy in America.
His views were in stark contrast to the prevailing sentiments of the time, as most Americans were staunchly opposed to the idea of a monarchy. Burr’s support for a monarchist government raised eyebrows and drew criticism from his contemporaries, including Thomas Jefferson, who famously referred to Burr as a “dangerous man.”
Despite his controversial views, Burr’s legacy as a monarchist has largely been overshadowed by his more infamous actions. However, his support for a system of government that was antithetical to the principles upon which America was founded serves as a reminder of the diverse range of perspectives that have shaped the history of our nation.
In a time when political divisions run deep, it is important to remember figures like Burr who challenged the status quo and pushed the boundaries of what was considered acceptable. While his monarchist beliefs may seem outlandish to us today, they serve as a cautionary tale against blind adherence to tradition and the dangers of unchecked power.
As we continue to navigate the complexities of our political landscape, it is crucial to remain vigilant against any forces that seek to undermine the democratic principles that form the foundation of our country. Aaron Burr may have been America’s most famous monarchist, but his legacy serves as a reminder of the enduring importance of defending and upholding the values that define us as a nation.
Tags:
- American history
- Monarchist beliefs
- United States monarchy
- Founding fathers
- American political history
- Monarchy in America
- Monarchist movements
- George Washington
- American political views
- Monarchist perspectives
#Opinion #Dubious #History #Americas #Famous #Monarchist
National Geographic Guide to America’s Outdoors: The Mid-Atlantic by Jones, Ann
National Geographic Guide to America’s Outdoors: The Mid-Atlantic by Jones, Ann
Price : 6.60
Ends on : N/A
View on eBay
National Geographic Guide to America’s Outdoors: The Mid-Atlantic by Jones, AnnAre you looking for an adventure in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States? Look no further than the National Geographic Guide to America’s Outdoors: The Mid-Atlantic by Ann Jones. This comprehensive guide is your ticket to exploring the beauty and diversity of the outdoors in states like Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, and more.
From hiking and biking trails to scenic overlooks and wildlife sightings, this guide has everything you need to plan your next outdoor excursion. Whether you’re a seasoned outdoor enthusiast or just looking for a weekend getaway, this book has something for everyone.
So grab your hiking boots, pack your camera, and get ready to explore the wonders of the Mid-Atlantic with the help of Ann Jones and National Geographic. Your next outdoor adventure awaits!
#National #Geographic #Guide #Americas #Outdoors #MidAtlantic #Jones #Ann,annBoom: America’s answer to Concorde prepares for first supersonic flight
Editor’s note: Sign up for Unlocking the World, CNN Travel’s weekly newsletter. Get news about destinations, plus the latest in aviation, food and drink, and where to stay.
CNN
—
The return of supersonic travel has been remarkably slow for something faster than the speed of sound, but a major milestone is set to be hit on January 28.
Boom Supersonic, the American company building what promises to be the world’s fastest airliner, is preparing to break the sound barrier for the first time with a test flight at 7.45 a.m. local time in Mojave, California.
The XB-1 demonstrator aircraft, which has completed 11 successful test flights since it first took to the air in March 2024, is the precursor to the development of Boom’s supersonic commercial airliner, Overture.
The hotly anticipated plane already has 130 orders and pre-orders from American Airlines, United Airlines and Japan Airlines.
A livestream will record what should be a historic moment for the first civil supersonic jet built in America and the world’s first independently developed supersonic jet.
The aircraft, which is usually flown by Boom’s chief test pilot Tristan “Gepetto” Brandenburg, will — if all goes to plan — accelerate to Mach 1.1 (around 844 miles per hour / 1,358 kilometers per hour) after reaching target altitude.
The fastest speed the XB-1 has reached so far is Mach 0.95, just below the supersonic threshold of Mach 1, which it hit during its last test flight on January 10.
When the XB-1 takes off from the Mojave Air and Space Port it will be in the same historic airspace where legendary pilot Chuck Yeager broke the sound barrier for the first time in 1947.
It’s now almost 55 years since the 002 prototype for Concorde first flew at Mach 1 on March 25, 1970, and more than 21 years since commercial supersonic travel ended with the Anglo-French airliner’s final flight in November 2023.
There have been several challengers in the supersonic space while the remaining Concordes gather dust at museums in the UK, US and France, but so far no one has succeeded.
Boom Supersonic’s ambitions remain high. CEO Blake Scholl told CNN last year that he expects supersonic planes to replace conventional airliners in our lifetime.
“I very much believe in the return of supersonic air travel, and ultimately to bring it to every passenger on every route. And that’s not something that takes place overnight,” he said in March 2024.
Boom’s plan is that Overture will be in operation before the end of the decade, carrying 64 to 80 passengers at Mach 1.7, about twice the speed of today’s subsonic airliners.
Back when CNN Travel spoke with Scholl in May 2021, he told us his dream was for people to one day be able to “fly anywhere in the world in four hours for $100.” In 2024, he confirmed that was still his “north star.”
The company’s plan is for Overture to one day operate on more than 600 routes worldwide.
“A faster airplane is much more human-efficient, and it’s much more capital-efficient. You can do more flights, with the same airplane and crew,” Scholl said.
“We can significantly reduce all of the cost and impact that goes into airplanes by making them faster. if we have faster airplanes, we don’t need as many.”
The XB-1 test craft has been used to prove new technologies developed by Boom Supersonic.
Like Concorde, the XB-1 and Overture both have a long nose and a high angle of attack for takeoff and landing, which interrupts the pilots’ view of the runway.
While Concorde dealt with this by having a moveable droop nose, Boom’s augmented reality vision system enables excellent runway visibility for the pilots without that extra weight and complexity.
“The advent of digital engineering is a huge enabler for why supersonic flight’s coming back,” Scholl told CNN in 2024. “Aerodynamics, materials, propulsion: Those are the big three areas where we’ve made huge progress versus Concorde.”
Back in the 1960s, Concorde was developed in wind tunnels, which meant building costly physical models, running tests, then repeating.
“You just can’t test very many designs, when every iteration costs millions and takes months,” explains Scholl. But Boom has perfected its aircraft’s efficient, aerodynamic design using computational fluid dynamics, which “is basically a digital wind tunnel. We can run the equivalent of hundreds of wind tunnel tests overnight in simulation for a fraction of the cost of a real wind tunnel test.”
XB-1 is made almost entirely from carbon fiber composites, selected for being both strong and lightweight.
Overture is designed to be powered by conventional jet engines and to run on up to 100% sustainable aviation fuel (SAF).
We’ve covered the so-far slow adoption of SAF before here on CNN Travel, and Scholl told CNN last year that he was well aware of its current problems.
“There’s not enough of it, and it costs too much, but it is scaling,” he said, but he reckoned that one day it’ll be used for all long-haul air travel. It’s the “future of aviation,” he declared.
Construction was completed last year on Boom’s Overture Superfactory in Greensboro, North Carolina. It’s been designed to scale to produce 66 Overture aircraft per year.
Boom Supersonic, the American aerospace company, is gearing up for its first supersonic flight test of its Overture aircraft. This revolutionary plane is set to be America’s answer to the iconic Concorde, which was retired in 2003.The Overture is designed to fly at speeds of Mach 2.2, which is more than twice the speed of sound. This means that passengers will be able to travel from New York to London in just three and a half hours, cutting the current flight time in half.
Boom Supersonic has been working tirelessly on developing this groundbreaking aircraft, which is set to revolutionize air travel once again. With its sleek design and cutting-edge technology, the Overture promises to provide passengers with a luxurious and efficient supersonic travel experience.
As the company prepares for its first supersonic flight test, excitement is building among aviation enthusiasts and travelers alike. The Overture is set to usher in a new era of supersonic travel, and Boom Supersonic is leading the way. Stay tuned for updates on this exciting development in the world of aviation.
Tags:
- Boom supersonic flight
- America’s Concorde
- supersonic travel
- Boom aircraft
- hypersonic flight
- supersonic boom technology
- supersonic jet
- Boom supersonic news
- Concorde successor
- supersonic aviation industry
#Boom #Americas #answer #Concorde #prepares #supersonic #flight
Companies are running away from DEI. One of America’s biggest beauty brands is standing firm
New York
CNN
—
Some of the biggest brands in America, including Amazon, Meta, Walmart and McDonald’s, have recently changed or ended their diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs. But e.l.f. Beauty, a popular cosmetics brand, is a rare company vocally touting its diversity efforts and inclusive marketing like its “So Many Dicks” campaign.
The provocative advertising campaign last year highlighted that nearly as many men named Richard, Rick or Dick served on public US company boards as women altogether.
“There’s nothing wrong with being Richard, Rick or Dick, but we wanted to shine a light on ‘let’s give other people a chance’ because we’ve seen the benefits in our own business,” e.l.f. CEO Tarang Amin said in an interview last week with CNN. E.l.f is one of only two publicly traded companies with a board that’s more than 78% women and 44% people of color.
E.l.f, which stands for “eye, lip, face” and sells at Walmart, Target and Walgreens is making the business case for diversity efforts at a moment when these initiatives are under attack across the country.
DEI, or diversity, equity and inclusion, has become a dirty word on the right. Many companies are pulling back on DEI programs and socially driven marketing, fearful of becoming the next Bud Light. Bud Light’s parent company A-B InBev lost as much as $1.4 billion in sales because of backlash to Bud Light’s brief partnership with a transgender influencer.
Other companies have altered DEI programs in response to opposition from right-wing activists, lawsuits from conservative legal groups, demand from conservative-leaning customers and other factors. President Donald Trump this week also placed employees in any federal diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility offices on leave, and the Trump administration plans to take further aim at diversity programs.
But E.l.f., based in Oakland, California, is standing behind DEI because it has an employee base and loyal following of younger, more diverse consumers that back its efforts.
Comments like “I have never loved ELF more in my life!!!” poured in on Instagram in response to e.l.f’s “So Many Dicks” campaign. “I’m so proud of this brand,” another said. While the majority of social media posts were positive, support for the campaign wasn’t universal. Some people questioned what corporate board representation had to do with makeup and said e.l.f. should “leave politics and your opinions on social issues out of cosmetics.”
E.l.f. has reaped the benefits of its strategy. The company has posted 23 consecutive quarters of sales growth, and its stock has increased by more 700% over the past five years.
E.l.f. doesn’t have a DEI team, but its commitment to hiring a diverse workforce across gender, race, sexual orientation, nationality and other demographic lines has driven its success, Amin said. Around 75% of its roughly 500 employees are women and 40% are people of color. As part of e.l.f.’s diversity and inclusion strategy, the company also features transgender and non-binary models in advertising.
“Diverse voices actually help us because they’re bringing different perspectives,” Amin, 59, said. Companies that abandon their diversity efforts risk losing out on “incredible talent that has different points of view and that add perspective to a company.”
DEI is generally a mix of employee training, employee resource networks and recruiting practices to advance representation of different races, genders and classes, people with disabilities, veterans and other underrepresented groups. Opponents like Elon Musk say DEI represents “reverse racism” and has claimed that race now trumps all qualifications for hiring and promotions.
Companies that have reversed DEI efforts sometimes are “succumbing to pressures” of anti-DEI sentiment, Amin said. “They’re reacting to one constituency.”
E.l.f. does not risk as much backlash from its approach as other brands because it has a concentrated base of Millenial and Gen Z consumers that are likelier to support DEI efforts, said Anna Glassgen, an analyst who covers the brand at B. Riley Financial.
Women, workers under 30 and minority employees are the most likely to say focusing on DEI at work is a good thing, according to 2023 polling from Pew Research Center.
“The majority of folks who would complain about e.l.f.’s DEI perspective are not their target consumers,” said Jarvis Sam, a former chief diversity, equity and inclusion officer at Nike and the founder of The Rainbow Disruption, a DEI consulting firm. The beauty and cosmetics industry has long been scrutinized for a lack of diversity, and e.l.f.’s inclusive marketing efforts helped distinguish the brand from older, more established beauty lines such as Revlon, he said.
CEO Amin also is not concerned about backlash to e.l.f.’s efforts, including from right-wing activists like Robby Starbuck.
Starbuck, a former Hollywood music video director-turned-conservative activist, has caught fire campaigning online against major companies’ DEI programs and other progressive initiatives. He has targeted companies such as John Deere, Tractor Supply and others online and claimed credit for many of the changes they are making.
Starbuck would be ill-advised to target e.l.f.’s diversity efforts, Amin said.
“Our community is highly vocal and highly loyal, so it would be a mistake for him to start tweeting on that because they can be pretty vicious when people go against their beloved e.l.f.,” he said.
Despite some companies’ changes, Amin also said CEOs and business leaders he speaks to are still committed to expanding diversity within their companies.
“I think a lot is made out of this whole anti-DEI thing,” he said. “I think more people are committed to having more diverse workforces that are inclusive than there are people who are not.”
Other companies are also defending DEI, such as Costco and Apple.
Costco’s board of directors recently recommended that its shareholders vote against a proposal brought by a conservative think tank, the National Center for Public Policy Research, that would require Costco to report on the financial risks of maintaining its diversity and inclusion goals. The group criticized Costco for possible “illegal discrimination” against employees who are “white, Asian, male or straight.”
Costco said its DEI efforts help the company attract and retain a wide range of employees and improve merchandise and services in stores. Costco also said its members want to interact with a diverse employee base.
“Among other things, a diverse group of employees helps bring originality and creativity to our merchandise offerings, promoting the ‘treasure hunt’ that our customers value,” Costco said in its proxy statement to investors.
Costco “framed it well in terms of when they have a more diverse workforce, they see better engagement,” Amin said. “It’s the same thing for us.”
In recent years, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) have become hot topics in the corporate world. Many companies have made public commitments to promoting DEI within their organizations, but unfortunately, some are falling short on their promises.It’s disheartening to see companies backing away from their DEI initiatives, but one major beauty brand is standing firm in their dedication to creating a more inclusive and equitable workplace. This brand understands the importance of diversity and is committed to fostering a culture where all employees feel valued and respected.
While some companies may be shying away from the challenges of implementing DEI initiatives, this beauty brand is leading by example and showing that it is possible to make meaningful progress in promoting diversity and inclusion within the workplace. It’s refreshing to see a company prioritize these values and stay true to their commitment, despite the obstacles that may arise.
As consumers, we have the power to support companies that prioritize DEI and hold others accountable for failing to do so. Let’s celebrate and uplift the companies that are taking a stand for diversity and inclusion, like this beauty brand, and encourage others to follow suit. Together, we can create a more equitable and inclusive world for all.
Tags:
- DEI in the workplace
- Diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives
- Corporate diversity efforts
- Diversity in America’s beauty industry
- Beauty industry diversity
- Corporate social responsibility
- Inclusive workplace practices
- Diversity and equity in business
- Promoting workplace diversity
- DEI challenges in corporate America
#Companies #running #DEI #Americas #biggest #beauty #brands #standing #firm
Companies are running away from DEI. One of America’s biggest beauty brands is standing firm
New York
CNN
—
Some of the biggest brands in America, including Amazon, Meta, Walmart and McDonald’s, have recently changed or ended their diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs. But e.l.f. Beauty, a popular cosmetics brand, is a rare company vocally touting its diversity efforts and inclusive marketing like its “So Many Dicks” campaign.
The provocative advertising campaign last year highlighted that nearly as many men named Richard, Rick or Dick served on public US company boards as women altogether.
“There’s nothing wrong with being Richard, Rick or Dick, but we wanted to shine a light on ‘let’s give other people a chance’ because we’ve seen the benefits in our own business,” e.l.f. CEO Tarang Amin said in an interview last week with CNN. E.l.f is one of only two publicly traded companies with a board that’s more than 78% women and 44% people of color.
E.l.f, which stands for “eye, lip, face” and sells at Walmart, Target and Walgreens is making the business case for diversity efforts at a moment when these initiatives are under attack across the country.
DEI, or diversity, equity and inclusion, has become a dirty word on the right. Many companies are pulling back on DEI programs and socially driven marketing, fearful of becoming the next Bud Light. Bud Light’s parent company A-B InBev lost as much as $1.4 billion in sales because of backlash to Bud Light’s brief partnership with a transgender influencer.
Other companies have altered DEI programs in response to opposition from right-wing activists, lawsuits from conservative legal groups, demand from conservative-leaning customers and other factors. President Donald Trump this week also placed employees in any federal diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility offices on leave, and the Trump administration plans to take further aim at diversity programs.
But E.l.f., based in Oakland, California, is standing behind DEI because it has an employee base and loyal following of younger, more diverse consumers that back its efforts.
Comments like “I have never loved ELF more in my life!!!” poured in on Instagram in response to e.l.f’s “So Many Dicks” campaign. “I’m so proud of this brand,” another said. While the majority of social media posts were positive, support for the campaign wasn’t universal. Some people questioned what corporate board representation had to do with makeup and said e.l.f. should “leave politics and your opinions on social issues out of cosmetics.”
E.l.f. has reaped the benefits of its strategy. The company has posted 23 consecutive quarters of sales growth, and its stock has increased by more 700% over the past five years.
E.l.f. doesn’t have a DEI team, but its commitment to hiring a diverse workforce across gender, race, sexual orientation, nationality and other demographic lines has driven its success, Amin said. Around 75% of its roughly 500 employees are women and 40% are people of color. As part of e.l.f.’s diversity and inclusion strategy, the company also features transgender and non-binary models in advertising.
“Diverse voices actually help us because they’re bringing different perspectives,” Amin, 59, said. Companies that abandon their diversity efforts risk losing out on “incredible talent that has different points of view and that add perspective to a company.”
DEI is generally a mix of employee training, employee resource networks and recruiting practices to advance representation of different races, genders and classes, people with disabilities, veterans and other underrepresented groups. Opponents like Elon Musk say DEI represents “reverse racism” and has claimed that race now trumps all qualifications for hiring and promotions.
Companies that have reversed DEI efforts sometimes are “succumbing to pressures” of anti-DEI sentiment, Amin said. “They’re reacting to one constituency.”
E.l.f. does not risk as much backlash from its approach as other brands because it has a concentrated base of Millenial and Gen Z consumers that are likelier to support DEI efforts, said Anna Glassgen, an analyst who covers the brand at B. Riley Financial.
Women, workers under 30 and minority employees are the most likely to say focusing on DEI at work is a good thing, according to 2023 polling from Pew Research Center.
“The majority of folks who would complain about e.l.f.’s DEI perspective are not their target consumers,” said Jarvis Sam, a former chief diversity, equity and inclusion officer at Nike and the founder of The Rainbow Disruption, a DEI consulting firm. The beauty and cosmetics industry has long been scrutinized for a lack of diversity, and e.l.f.’s inclusive marketing efforts helped distinguish the brand from older, more established beauty lines such as Revlon, he said.
CEO Amin also is not concerned about backlash to e.l.f.’s efforts, including from right-wing activists like Robby Starbuck.
Starbuck, a former Hollywood music video director-turned-conservative activist, has caught fire campaigning online against major companies’ DEI programs and other progressive initiatives. He has targeted companies such as John Deere, Tractor Supply and others online and claimed credit for many of the changes they are making.
Starbuck would be ill-advised to target e.l.f.’s diversity efforts, Amin said.
“Our community is highly vocal and highly loyal, so it would be a mistake for him to start tweeting on that because they can be pretty vicious when people go against their beloved e.l.f.,” he said.
Despite some companies’ changes, Amin also said CEOs and business leaders he speaks to are still committed to expanding diversity within their companies.
“I think a lot is made out of this whole anti-DEI thing,” he said. “I think more people are committed to having more diverse workforces that are inclusive than there are people who are not.”
Other companies are also defending DEI, such as Costco and Apple.
Costco’s board of directors recently recommended that its shareholders vote against a proposal brought by a conservative think tank, the National Center for Public Policy Research, that would require Costco to report on the financial risks of maintaining its diversity and inclusion goals. The group criticized Costco for possible “illegal discrimination” against employees who are “white, Asian, male or straight.”
Costco said its DEI efforts help the company attract and retain a wide range of employees and improve merchandise and services in stores. Costco also said its members want to interact with a diverse employee base.
“Among other things, a diverse group of employees helps bring originality and creativity to our merchandise offerings, promoting the ‘treasure hunt’ that our customers value,” Costco said in its proxy statement to investors.
Costco “framed it well in terms of when they have a more diverse workforce, they see better engagement,” Amin said. “It’s the same thing for us.”
In a troubling trend, many companies are shying away from their commitments to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. However, one of America’s biggest beauty brands, L’Oréal, is standing firm in their dedication to promoting diversity and inclusion in the workplace.While some companies may see DEI efforts as a burden or a distraction from their bottom line, L’Oréal understands the importance of creating a diverse and inclusive work environment. They have implemented various programs and initiatives to ensure that all employees feel valued and respected, regardless of their background or identity.
L’Oréal’s commitment to DEI is not just lip service – they have taken concrete actions to promote diversity within their organization. From implementing unconscious bias training to launching employee resource groups for underrepresented communities, L’Oréal is actively working to create a more inclusive workplace.
In a time when many companies are shying away from their DEI commitments, it is refreshing to see a major beauty brand like L’Oréal leading the charge. By standing firm in their dedication to diversity and inclusion, L’Oréal is setting an example for other companies to follow.
Tags:
DEI in the workplace, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, workplace diversity, corporate social responsibility, diversity initiatives, beauty industry, beauty brands, corporate values, social justice, workplace culture, equality and diversity, inclusive workplace, corporate diversity programs, DEI strategies
#Companies #running #DEI #Americas #biggest #beauty #brands #standing #firmAmerica’s Story Vol 1 (Teacher Guide) – Paperback By Angela, Brand New
America’s Story Vol 1 (Teacher Guide) – Paperback By Angela, Brand New
Price : 16.99
Ends on : N/A
View on eBay
America’s Story Vol 1 (Teacher Guide) – Paperback By Angela, Brand NewAttention all history teachers! Are you looking for a comprehensive guide to teaching American history to your students? Look no further than America’s Story Vol 1 teacher guide by Angela. This brand new paperback guide is filled with engaging lesson plans, activities, and resources to help bring American history to life in your classroom.
With America’s Story Vol 1 teacher guide, you can easily plan and implement engaging lessons that will captivate your students’ interest in American history. From the early Native American civilizations to the founding of the United States, this guide covers all the key events and figures that have shaped America.
Don’t miss out on this valuable resource for teaching American history. Order your copy of America’s Story Vol 1 teacher guide today and make history come alive for your students!
#Americas #Story #Vol #Teacher #Guide #Paperback #Angela #Brand,ages 3+America’s ‘Intelligence Age’ Hinges on a Highly Complex Building Plan
- AI leaders are preparing to take America into what Sam Altman calls the “Intelligence Age.”
- Getting there will depend on building vast amounts of new AI infrastructure on US soil.
- Whether investments in this infrastructure will ever pay off is another matter.
America is ready to reach a new age of intelligence. Getting there —and staying ahead of rival nations in the AI race — depends on a plan to transform the physical world that’s becoming more formidable by the day.
Leaders driving the AI boom entered 2025 by getting louder about the radical transformation they say is needed on US soil to deliver an era of AI-led superintelligence: more data centers, more chip plants, and more power infrastructure.
By taking root in the physical world — huge data center facilities depend on complex wiring, hardware, and integration with power infrastructure across vast amounts of landmass — the hope is that AI software could one day transform society the way the Industrial Age did.
Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, calls this next leap the “Intelligence Age.” In a September blog post, Altman said its defining characteristic would be “massive prosperity.” However, he cautioned that without enough infrastructure, “AI will be a very limited resource that wars get fought over and that becomes mostly a tool for rich people.”
Last week, in one of his final executive orders, President Joe Biden signaled intent to build more at home with plans to lease acres of federal land to private sector firms with the know-how to develop complex AI infrastructure. The intent to build is likely to continue after Donald Trump’s inauguration on Monday, as tech leaders rally around the incoming president and put AI among the top priorities on his agenda.
Biden’s executive order followed the release of a blueprint from OpenAI a day earlier, which claimed “the economic opportunity AI presents is too compelling to forfeit” by not building the infrastructure needed.
Data centers, power plants, and chip manufacturing plants will all cost money — a lot of money. Goldman Sachs estimates that roughly $1 trillion will be spent in the next few years alone to develop the infrastructure needed to bring today’s AI models closer to superintelligence.
It’s why the big question investors and companies must now grapple with is whether or not they are willing to put up money for a vision of the future that is hardly guaranteed.
The case for building AI infrastructure
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is calling for more investment in AI infrastructure in the US. Eugene Gologursky/Getty Images for The New York Times
Altman has offered no shortage of reasons for spending so much money on achieving superintelligence.
Ensuring technological hegemony over China is one. As his company said last week, “there’s an estimated $175 billion sitting in global funds awaiting investment in AI projects” that “will flow to China-backed projects” and strengthen Beijing if not directed to the US.
Another is that superintelligence could unlock unimaginable prosperity for society. Altman recently said that “if we could fast-forward a hundred years,” the prosperity from superintelligence would feel just as unimaginable as today’s world would to a lamplighter, a person employed to light and maintain street lights until about the 1950s.
The third reason is perhaps more surprising. In a blog published at the start of the year, Altman said his company is now confident that it knows how to build artificial general intelligence, a term often interchanged with superintelligence despite their differences.
It’s a combination of factors that will, in some way, have triggered the flood of comments from those who want to play their part in developing the infrastructure needed to deliver superintelligence.
In a blog published this month titled “The Golden Opportunity for American AI,” Microsoft president Brad Smith said the company planned to spend $80 billion alone this year on data centers. “Not since the invention of electricity has the United States had the opportunity it has today to harness new technology to invigorate the nation’s economy,” he said.
Last year, in conjunction with BlackRock and others, the tech giant unveiled a fund focused on AI infrastructure with an investment potential of up to $100 billion.
In an interview with Semafor last month, Google CEO Sundar Pichai said that he was ready to work on a “Manhattan Project” for AI once Donald Trump takes office, underscoring the scale of the development and investment needed by invoking the World War II program that eventually produced the atomic bomb.
Meanwhile, Japanese conglomerate SoftBank committed $100 billion to investing in the US over the next four years, focusing on AI and related infrastructure.
A risky investment
AI infrastructure faces an uphill struggle to get built. Jason marz/1368745971/Getty Images
While there is clear intent to develop AI infrastructure, it’s not clear if or when the investments will pay off — for two key reasons.
First, much of the infrastructure needed in the US faces an uphill struggle to get built.
Take chip plants. US companies like Nvidia, Google, AMD, and others that specialize in designing chips have developed a significant reliance on Taiwanese firm TSMC to manufacture those chips in the Far East, where a combination of cheap, skilled labor, economies of scale, and a long history of government support for the semiconductor sector has made the incredibly expensive business of manufacturing chips easier to pull-off.
Simply throwing capital at projects aimed at getting chips manufactured in the US won’t cut it. Efforts to build chip manufacturing plants at home have been taking shape — the Biden administration’s CHIPS Act has provided billions of dollars of grants to semiconductor firms in the US — but there remains a huge gap between the capabilities of manufacturers in the East versus those at home.
The AI boom has been kind to TSMC, with its value roughly doubling last year to $1.1 trillion. US chip manufacturer Intel, meanwhile, more than halved to around $85 billion.
Clean power infrastructure, increasingly focused on nuclear power, also faces challenges. Returns on investment in nuclear power projects meant to provide clean energy to intensive data centers are highly uncertain. These projects also face significant regulatory hurdles.
In December, for instance, the States of Texas, Utah, and Washington D.C.-based company Last Energy sued the Nuclear Regulatory Commission over claims that the government agency was applying the same risk analysis to small modular reactors as it was to large-scale power plants. These SMRs, as they’re known, are meant to make access to nuclear power cheaper, given their compactness and greater affordability versus traditional nuclear plants. But even these face roadblocks.
The second big reason that investors may want to approach infrastructure investment with caution is that the emergence of superintelligence remains highly speculative.
Altman’s claim that there is now a clear path to AGI is worth taking seriously, as new models like OpenAI’s o3 released in December demonstrate increasingly sophisticated reasoning capabilities that do more than just parrot their training data.
That said, there have been rumblings across the industry recently about AI models hitting a wall in terms of performance improvements.
Without really serious advances in capabilities, then, or a clearly defined path forward to superintelligence, it is not clear how or when these colossal bets on AI infrastructure will pay off. But with China and other nations showing no sign of slowing down, it is clear that the cost of not being in the AI race could be far greater.
As we enter into the era of advanced technology and interconnected systems, the United States is faced with the challenge of developing a highly complex building plan to support the country’s intelligence infrastructure. The rise of artificial intelligence, big data, and cybersecurity threats have made it imperative for the nation to stay ahead in the intelligence game.The backbone of America’s intelligence age lies in its ability to gather, analyze, and disseminate information effectively. This requires a sophisticated network of buildings, data centers, and communication systems that can keep up with the rapidly evolving landscape of intelligence capabilities.
From state-of-the-art intelligence agencies to secure data centers, every aspect of the intelligence infrastructure must be carefully planned and executed to ensure maximum efficiency and effectiveness. This includes ensuring that buildings are equipped with the latest technology, cybersecurity measures are in place, and communication systems are seamlessly integrated.
Furthermore, the intelligence building plan must also take into account the growing need for collaboration and information sharing among different agencies and organizations. This means creating spaces that facilitate communication, collaboration, and innovation, while also maintaining the highest level of security and confidentiality.
As we move into this new era of intelligence, it is crucial that America invests in a comprehensive building plan that can support the country’s intelligence needs for years to come. By staying ahead of the curve and adapting to new challenges, the United States can maintain its position as a global leader in intelligence and national security.
Tags:
- America’s Intelligence Age
- Building Plan for Intelligence Age
- Complex Building Plan
- Intelligence Age Strategy
- Technology in Intelligence Age
- Future of American Intelligence
- Strategic Planning for Intelligence Age
- National Security Building Plan
- Innovation in Intelligence Age
- Intelligence Infrastructure Development
#Americas #Intelligence #Age #Hinges #Highly #Complex #Building #Plan
David Lynch Was America’s Cinematic Poet
David Lynch died yesterday at the age of 78, after a career that made him perhaps the most consequential American art filmmaker in the history of the medium. But his singular voice extended far beyond cinema, into television, music, internet fame, coffee making, furniture design, transcendental meditation, and practically any other creative endeavor you can imagine. He was a brand, though a fiercely independent one: Beginning with his debut movie, Eraserhead, in 1977, Lynch became the rare kind of artist whose last name seemed to describe an entire genre. He established a style that offered an otherworldly reckoning with our way of life, incorporating classic Hollywood storytelling, pulpy romanticism, and abstract surrealism all at once.
Lynch’s canon was so tremendous that each of his many fans and acolytes likely had different entry points into it. There was the aggressive midnight-screening oddness of Eraserhead in the 1970s; the frightening mix of throwback folksiness and depraved sexuality in Blue Velvet in the 1980s; and the bizarre-but-incredible TV phenomenon that was Twin Peaks in the early 1990s. Others found him through 2001’s Mulholland Drive, a staggering collision of Hollywood dreamscapes, or 2017’s inimitable Twin Peaks: The Return, which exploded the form of “prestige television” that its predecessor had helped plant the seeds for. These are just a few of Lynch’s achievements in a body of work that spanned big-budget and micro-budget, highbrow and low. His output was also defined by his personal celebrity—a folksy, chain-smoking former Eagle Scout who produced art of high complexity while also rhapsodizing about the simple pleasures of eating a doughnut with a cup of coffee.
The first Lynch film I saw in a theater was Mulholland Drive, at the age of 15. A budding cinephile, I was only somewhat aware of the director’s titanic reputation and of the movie’s circuitous journey to the screen. (It was initially intended as a television pilot, a Twin Peaks successor that ABC ultimately rejected.) Mulholland Drive was an artistic thunderbolt like no other for me, and watching it for the first time is still probably the most transformative experience I’ve ever had in a cinema. I can palpably recall my terror during the early sequence at Winkie’s Diner, in which two men discuss a dream one had involving some ineffable monster out back, and the transfixing mystery of Club Silencio, one of Lynch’s many on-screen environments that seemed to have a foot in multiple realities. The film was at certain times a chilling representation of fear, trauma, and death, but at others hauntingly lovely and funny. It opened my eyes to what movies could be, beyond just the entertaining product they usually were.
Mulholland Drive resisted easy explanation, as did all of the director’s stories. But, boiled down, many had a sweet purity to them, involving battles of good and evil and harsh realities endured by pure spirits. The director had a charmed and normal childhood, by all accounts; he was born in Montana but moved all over the country as a kid, living in Washington, North Carolina, Idaho, and Virginia at various points. Still, he would later recall moments that punctured that idyll. “When I was little, my brother and I were outdoors late one night, and we saw a naked woman come walking down the street toward us in a dazed state, crying. I have never forgotten that moment,” he once told Roger Ebert, evoking an image that would serve as Blue Velvet’s centerpiece many years after the fact.
More adult life events inspired his first feature, however. A quiet, eccentric, ink-black comedy about a peculiar young man who works at a factory in an industrial dystopia, Eraserhead is plainly Lynch’s way of processing his life as an early parent in Philadelphia. Its protagonist struggles to raise a mutant creature while also dealing with nattering in-laws and a mundane job. Most theatergoers were likely to find the film off-putting—what with its clanking, abrasive soundtrack, beautifully cloying interludes of simple songs, and unabashedly nonnarrative strangeness. Eraserhead could have died in obscurity, but it became a cult-movie sensation instead, the kind that circulates among artsy gatherings, comic-book shops, and other underground scenes, as much of Lynch’s filmography now does.
The veteran comedian and filmmaker Mel Brooks saw the movie and, somehow, it resonated with him. He then hired Lynch—over far more objectively qualified, well-known names—to direct a project that Brooks had been nurturing, The Elephant Man. It was a critical smash that landed several Oscar nominations, and Lynch’s industry ascension seemed set. His follow-up was the sci-fi epic Dune, an adaptation of the blockbuster Frank Herbert novel, for which Lynch claimed he had passed on Return of the Jedi. But it was an artistically compromised box-office failure; the director never made a big-budget film again. He instead found greater success once he’d swerved back to his more personal fascinations: His next film was the alternately astonishing and repellent Blue Velvet, a nasty noir fairy tale of gangsters and abuse in a picture-perfect suburban town.
Lynch took many, many creative risks over the years, but Blue Velvet is the movie that perhaps best melded grim violence and white-picket-fence cheerfulness—a vision that came to characterize him in the public eye. The director continued to dig beneath idealism’s rot for the remainder of his career, and the 1990 premiere of Twin Peaks brought his worldview to a broader swath of viewers. Co-created by the writer Mark Frost, the ABC show was an uncanny soap opera, powered by a murder mystery that briefly captured the country’s imagination. Twin Peaks ran out of ratings steam quickly over the course of its initial, two-season run, but it’s since emerged as Lynch’s quintessential work. The series’ legacy was powered by both its empathy—the stark and sincere emotion the director could deploy so beautifully—and the way it transformed between various media over time. Twin Peaks evolved into a larger, decades-spanning project, encompassing the aggressively tragic and beautiful prequel film, Fire Walk With Me, in 1992, and the confounding, hilarious, and formally defiant sequel show, The Return, which premiered 25 years later.
In his later life, Lynch charged into the digital frontier in his typically singular fashion. He used grainy digital video cameras to shoot the bizarre California epic Inland Empire mostly on his own dime; he uploaded original, offbeat episodic projects and crudely animated cartoons exclusively for subscribers to his website. The director was an excellent marketer of himself, despite his preference for alienating themes and aesthetic choices: His trademark non-sequitur-filled humor and rambling sincerity connected both him and his oeuvre to generation after generation. Lynch, more than many of his peers, could expose audiences to the harshest, most discomforting imagery while also balefully commanding them to “fix their hearts or die.” If the American experience had a cinematic poet, it was him. The news that Lynch had left us was shocking only because it seemed that he’d be here with us forever.
David Lynch is widely regarded as one of America’s greatest filmmakers, known for his unique and surreal storytelling style that has captivated audiences for decades. But beyond just being a filmmaker, Lynch can also be seen as America’s cinematic poet, using his films to explore the deepest recesses of the human psyche and the dark underbelly of American society.Lynch’s films often delve into themes of identity, memory, and the subconscious, creating a rich tapestry of images and emotions that resonate with viewers on a deeply profound level. From the hauntingly beautiful landscapes of “Twin Peaks” to the nightmarish dreams of “Mulholland Drive,” Lynch’s work is a masterclass in visual storytelling and atmospheric filmmaking.
Like a poet, Lynch uses the language of cinema to evoke complex emotions and explore the complexities of the human experience. His films are filled with layers of symbolism and metaphor, inviting viewers to decipher their meaning and draw their own conclusions about the mysteries they contain.
In a cinematic landscape dominated by formulaic blockbusters and cookie-cutter storytelling, David Lynch stands out as a true artist, unafraid to challenge conventions and push the boundaries of what is possible in film. His work is a testament to the power of cinema as a medium for exploring the deepest recesses of the human soul, and his legacy as America’s cinematic poet is sure to endure for generations to come.
Tags:
- David Lynch
- American filmmaker
- Cinematic poetry
- Lynchian style
- Twin Peaks
- Mulholland Drive
- Blue Velvet
- Surrealism in film
- American cinema
- Visionary director
#David #Lynch #Americas #Cinematic #Poet