Zion Tech Group

Tag: Assessment

  • From Risk Assessment to Recovery: Steps for Implementing a Comprehensive Business Continuity Program

    From Risk Assessment to Recovery: Steps for Implementing a Comprehensive Business Continuity Program


    In today’s fast-paced business environment, disruptions can occur at any time, from natural disasters to cyber attacks. It is crucial for organizations to have a comprehensive business continuity program in place to ensure that they can continue operating and serving their customers in the face of adversity. From risk assessment to recovery, there are several steps that organizations can take to implement a robust business continuity program.

    The first step in implementing a business continuity program is conducting a thorough risk assessment. This involves identifying potential threats and vulnerabilities that could disrupt business operations, such as natural disasters, cyber attacks, or supply chain disruptions. By understanding the risks that the organization faces, business continuity planners can develop strategies to mitigate these risks and ensure that critical business functions can continue in the event of a disruption.

    Once the risks have been identified, the next step is to create a business continuity plan. This plan should outline the steps that need to be taken to ensure that critical business functions can continue operating during a disruption. It should include detailed procedures for responding to different types of disruptions, as well as a communication plan for keeping employees, customers, and other stakeholders informed.

    Training and testing are also essential components of a comprehensive business continuity program. All employees should be trained on their roles and responsibilities in the event of a disruption, and regular drills and exercises should be conducted to test the effectiveness of the business continuity plan. This will help to ensure that everyone knows what to do in an emergency and that the organization can respond quickly and effectively to any disruptions that occur.

    In the event of a disruption, the final step in the business continuity process is recovery. This involves restoring critical business functions and minimizing the impact of the disruption on the organization. Recovery efforts may include restoring IT systems, relocating employees to alternative work locations, and communicating with customers and other stakeholders about the status of operations.

    By following these steps and implementing a comprehensive business continuity program, organizations can better prepare for and respond to disruptions, ensuring that they can continue operating and serving their customers even in the face of adversity. With careful planning, training, and testing, organizations can minimize the impact of disruptions and recover quickly, maintaining their reputation and competitive advantage in the marketplace.

  • Advanced Fitness Assessment and Exercise – Paperback, by Gibson Ann L.; – New



    Advanced Fitness Assessment and Exercise – Paperback, by Gibson Ann L.; – New

    Price : 115.75

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    Looking to take your fitness routine to the next level? Look no further than “Advanced Fitness Assessment and Exercise” by Gibson Ann L. This comprehensive paperback provides in-depth knowledge on how to assess your current fitness level and tailor a workout plan that will help you reach your goals.

    With detailed explanations of various fitness assessments and exercises, this book is perfect for those looking to improve their overall fitness and performance. Whether you’re a seasoned athlete or just starting out on your fitness journey, this book will provide you with the tools and knowledge you need to achieve success.

    Don’t wait any longer to take your fitness to the next level. Pick up your copy of “Advanced Fitness Assessment and Exercise” today and start seeing results!
    #Advanced #Fitness #Assessment #Exercise #Paperback #Gibson #Ann,ann

  • Earthquake assessment declares humanitarian needs in Oromia’s Fentale district ‘severe’; seismic activities affect three out of four residents


    Due to recent seismic activities, close to 100,000 individuals have been displaced in the Afar, Oromia, and Amhara regions (Photo: Addis Standard Source)

    Addis Abeba – A recent seismic earthquake impact assessment conducted in the Fentale district of the East Shewa Zone, Oromia region, revealed that humanitarian needs in the area remain “severe” as communities grapple with the cumulative impact of multiple shocks, including conflict and drought.

    Conducted jointly by the government and humanitarian partners, the impact assessment report disclosed a critical situation at the lower administrative level with Daga Hedu Kebele classified as facing “severe” humanitarian needs, while Benti Kebele confronts “extremely severe” conditions.

    The report also identified other vulnerable kebeles near the Fentale Mountain epicenter, including Haro Kersa, Debiti, and Kobo.

    Since late September 2024, parts of Afar, Oromia, and Amhara have experienced significant seismic activity, with its effects reaching as far as the capital, Addis Abeba.

    In recent weeks, seismic activity has intensified, with approximately five tremors recorded daily, ranging in magnitude from 4.3 to 5.8. While the epicenter of these tremors appears concentrated in regions such as Awash within the Afar region, the impact assessment report underscores their pervasive influence, affecting “all 18 kebeles” situated within the Fentale district.

    Last weekAddis Standard reported that recent seismic activities have displaced nearly 10,000 residents in the North Shewa Zone of the Amhara region, which borders the Afar region. This displacement adds to the 80,000 people affected in the Afar and Oromia regions, bringing the total number of people impacted across the three regions to nearly 100,000.

    Close to 20,325 individuals displaced from the Fentale district have been evacuated to 11 designated Internally Displaced Persons (IDP) sites.

    “In most assessed sites, the impact of the seismic shocks on living conditions was reportedly very high, affecting up to three out of four individuals in local communities,” the impact assessment stated. “Many displaced persons are living in precarious conditions near Metahara town without access to food, shelter, or essential non-food items. They are sleeping in open areas without mats or plastic sheets, as the sudden displacement left them unable to bring their belongings.”

    It further underscored significant public health risks stemming from the earthquake, with limited access to clean water and sanitation increasing the likelihood of “disease outbreaks.”

    Recently, Addis Standard reported that displaced individuals in the Afar region are residing in overcrowded shelters with limited access to food, water, and essential supplies. According to residents displaced by the recent seismic activities, the aid provided by the government and humanitarian organizations remains “insufficient.” AS



    The recent earthquake assessment in Oromia’s Fentale district has revealed that humanitarian needs are deemed ‘severe’ in the region. The seismic activities have affected three out of four residents, highlighting the urgent need for humanitarian assistance.

    The assessment, conducted by experts in the field, has identified a range of critical needs including shelter, food, water, and medical supplies. The earthquake has caused widespread destruction, leaving many families homeless and in desperate need of support.

    As the situation in Fentale district continues to worsen, it is crucial that immediate action is taken to provide aid to those affected. The humanitarian community must come together to address the urgent needs of the residents and ensure that they receive the assistance they require to rebuild their lives.

    Our thoughts are with the people of Fentale district during this challenging time, and we urge the international community to rally together to support those in need. Together, we can make a difference and help the residents of Fentale district recover from this devastating natural disaster.

    Tags:

    1. Earthquake assessment
    2. Humanitarian needs
    3. Oromia
    4. Fentale district
    5. Seismic activities
    6. Residents
    7. Natural disaster
    8. Emergency response
    9. Relief efforts
    10. Impact assessment

    #Earthquake #assessment #declares #humanitarian #Oromias #Fentale #district #severe #seismic #activities #affect #residents

  • Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, January 26, 2025


    Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, January 26, 2025

    Angelica Evans, Christina Harward, William Runkel, Nate Trotter, and George Barros

    January 26, 2025, 6:10 pm ET 

    Click here to see ISW’s interactive map of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. This map is updated daily alongside the static maps present in this report.

    Click here to see ISW’s interactive map of Ukraine’s offensive in Kursk Oblast.

    Click here to see ISW’s 3D control of terrain topographic map of Ukraine. Use of a computer (not a mobile device) is strongly recommended for using this data-heavy tool.

    Click here to access ISW’s archive of interactive time-lapse maps of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. These maps complement the static control-of-terrain map that ISW produces daily by showing a dynamic frontline. ISW will update this time-lapse map archive monthly.

    Note: The data cut-off for this product was 12:15 am ET on January 26 ISW will cover subsequent reports in the January 27 Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment.

    Russian forces recently made further advances within Velyka Novosilka amid official Russian claims that Russian forces seized the entire settlement on January 26. Geolocated footage published on January 26 indicates that Russian forces advanced northward along Tsentralana Street in northern Velyka Novosilka.[1] Some Russian sources, including the Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD), claimed on January 26 that Russian forces completely seized Velyka Novosilka, whereas other Russian sources claimed that Russian forces had seized most of the settlement.[2] Some Russian milbloggers claimed that Russian forces are still clearing Ukrainian forces from the settlement, including the northern part, and that Ukrainian forces are still counterattacking in the area.[3] ISW has observed geolocated evidence to assess that Russian forces occupy 89 percent of the settlement, however. Khortytsia Group of Forces Spokesperson Major Viktor Trehubov stated on January 26 that Russian forces have not occupied all of Velyka Novosilka and that Ukrainian forces maintain positions in the settlement.[4] A Ukrainian brigade operating within Velyka Novosilka stated on January 26 that fighting continues within the settlement and that Russian forces do not pose a threat of encircling the brigade’s elements.[5] ISW has not observed independent evidence of Russian forces encircling Ukrainian forces in Velyka Novosilka. The Ukrainian brigade also reported that neither Russian nor Ukrainian forces can use heavy equipment due to parity of strikes near the contact line and that Ukrainian and Russian forces have “approximate parity” in terms of artillery and first-person view (FPV) drones but that Russian forces have a “huge” manpower advantage in the area.[6] The brigade stated that Ukrainian forces are conducting artillery and drone strikes against Russian forces within Velyka Novosilka and that the Mokri Yaly River that flows through western Velyka Novosilka is an obstacle to Russian advances. Russian forces continued offensive operations within and near Velyka Novosilka itself, northeast of Velyka Novosilka near Rozdolne, and west of Velyka Novosilka near Novosilka on January 25 and 26.[7]

    The Russian MoD notably is paying an abnormally high amount of fanfare to the claimed Russian seizure of Velyka Novosilka, very likely as part of informational efforts to shape Western perceptions of the battlefield situation in Ukraine and degrade international support for Ukraine. The Russian MoD posted footage during the day of January 26 purportedly showing Russian forces conducting thermobaric artillery strikes against Ukrainian forces in Velyka Novosilka and claimed that Russian assault groups were clearing Ukrainian positions.[8] The Russian MoD later claimed that elements of the Russian 5th Tank Brigade (36th Combined Arms Army [CAA], Eastern Military District [EMD]) and the 40th Naval Infantry Brigade (Pacific Fleet, EMD) seized all of Velyka Novosilka, and Russian Defense Minister Andrei Belousov congratulated the command and personnel of the two brigades for the seizure.[9] The Russian MoD subsequently posted footage purportedly showing Russian flags in multiple areas of the settlement.[10] Russian milbloggers claimed that elements of the Russian 37th Motorized Rifle Brigade (36th CAA) also participated in the claimed seizure of Velyka Novosilka, and it is unclear why the Russian MoD did not credit the 37th Motorized Rifle Brigade in their announcements.[11] The Russian MoD has not recently been announcing the claimed seizures of settlements with so much fanfare and as quickly as they did on January 26. Russia is likely trying to leverage the claimed seizure of Velyka Novosilka in order to influence Western perceptions of the situation on the battlefield in Donetsk Oblast, to advance narratives that Russian battlefield gains are inevitable and that Ukrainian positions are rapidly deteriorating. Russian gains in western Donetsk Oblast continue to be gradual and far below the pace that is normal for modern mechanized warfare. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether Russian forces will be able to rapidly advance beyond Velyka Novosilka, as it is unclear how much combat power elements of the EMD still retain after several months of continuous offensive operations. Velyka Novosilka is located next to several rivers which will likely complicate and hamper further Russian tactical advances in the area.[12] Russian forces have historically struggled with river crossings and tactical terrain features, such as rivers, will likely complicate Russian forces’ ability to leverage the seizure of Velyka Novosilka to make operationally significant advances in western Donetsk Oblast.

    The seizure and clearing of Velyka Novosilka will likely present opportunities and a decision point to the Russian military command on whether to redeploy elements of the Russian Eastern Military District [EMD] from the Velyka Novosilka area to other priority operational areas. Any redeployment of EMD elements from the Velyka Novosilka area over the coming weeks will indicate the Russian military command’s priority operational areas for offensive operations in Spring and Summer 2025. Elements of the Russian EMD have been the primary fighting force in the Vuhledar and Velyka Novosilka directions since at least early 2023, defended against the Ukrainian counteroffensive in Summer 2023, and later intensified offensive operations in the area in Fall 2024.[13] Elements of the EMD participated in the seizure of Vuhledar in September and October 2024 and successfully exploited the seizure of the settlement to advance north towards Kurakhove and west towards and into Velyka Novosilka over the following three months.[14] The seizure of Velyka Novosilka will present the Russian military command with a decision point during which the Russian military command can pursue several courses of action (COAs). Velyka Novosilka is protected from Ukrainian counterattack due to the settlement’s disposition near the Mokri Yaly River. The Russian military command may opt to retain elements of the EMD in the western Donetsk Oblast area and continue advancing towards the Donetsk-Dnipropetrovsk Oblast administrative boundary, which runs north and west of Velyka Novosilka. This decision would indicate that the Russian military is prioritizing advances to the administrative boundary as quickly as possible over other axes of advance in Donetsk Oblast or other frontline areas. It remains unclear how much combat power the EMD elements still retain after having engaged in intense operations for over six months, however. The Russian military command could also retain some EMD elements in the Velyka Novosilka area to continue limited attacks and pin Ukrainian forces in the area but redeploy the bulk of the EMD to another frontline area. Russian forces are currently intensifying offensive operations in the Kupyansk, Borova, Chasiv Yar, Toretsk, and Pokrovsk directions and are still working to eliminate the remainder of the Ukrainian salients in the Kurakhove direction and Kursk Oblast. Ukrainian officials have also recently warned that Russian forces may also renew offensive operations in Zaporizhia Oblast in 2025.[15] The Russian military command could redeploy EMD elements to any of these directions, and the redeployment of elements of the EMD will be an indicator of the Russian military command’s priority areas for Spring and Summer 2025.

    Russian forces are poised to seize Toretsk in the coming days and a redeployment of elements of the EMD to reinforce the Russian force grouping in the Toretsk direction would indicate a new Russian priority effort to resume attacks in the direction of Kostyantynivka. ISW previously assessed that Russian forces likely intend to exploit the seizure of Toretsk to push further west and along the T-05-16 Toretsk-Kostyantynivka highway towards the southernmost point of Ukraine’s fortress belt in Kostyantynivka.[16] Russian advances in the Toretsk direction have historically been slow as Russian forces fought through built-up urban areas, but Russian forces may begin to advance relatively more quickly once they break out of Toretsk into the more open fields west of the settlement. Russian forces may also attempt to leverage tactical gains within and near Toretsk and east of Pokrovsk to eliminate the Ukrainian salient southwest of Toretsk and select Russian milbloggers have recently speculated that Russian forces may be intensifying offensive operations southwest of Toretsk for this purpose.[17] Russian forces may want to eliminate the Ukrainian salient southwest of Toretsk in order to firm up their southern flank ahead of a push on Kostyantynivka. The Russian military command may redeploy elements of the EMD to reinforce offensive operations in the Toretsk direction if it intends to prioritize pressuring the Ukrainian fortress belt in Donetsk Oblast in the Spring and Summer 2025. Seizing Pokrovsk has been the Russian military command’s main operational objective in Donetsk Oblast since February 2024.[18] A Russian redeployment of EMD elements to the Toretsk or Chasiv Yar directions – as opposed to retaining the EMD elements in western Donetsk Oblast, redeploying them to the Zaporizhia direction, or redeploying them to the Pokrovsk direction – would therefore indicate an inflection in Russian operational priorities.

    Ukrainian forces conducted a second strike on the Ryazan Oil Refinery in Ryazan Oblast on the night of January 25 to 26. The Ukrainian General Staff reported on January 26 that elements of Ukraine’s Main Military Intelligence Directorate (GUR) and Unmanned Systems Forces struck the Ryazan Oil Refinery in Ryazan City.[19] Geolocated footage shows a fire at a tank at the refinery.[20] The Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) claimed on January 26 that Russian forces downed eight drones over Ryazan Oblast on the night of January 25 to 26.[21] Ryazan Oblast Governor Pavel Malkov claimed that Russian air defenses and electronic warfare (EW) systems destroyed Ukrainian drones over Ryazan Oblast and that authorities were assessing material damage.[22] Ukrainian official sources noted that the Ryazan Oil Refinery is one of the four largest refineries in Russia and produces fuel for military equipment; jet fuel; diesel fuel; and other petroleum products for tanks, aircraft, and ships.[23] Ukrainian forces last struck the Ryazan Oil Refinery on the night of January 23 to 24.[24]

    Key Takeaways:

    • Russian forces recently made further advances within Velyka Novosilka amid official Russian claims that Russian forces seized the entire settlement on January 26.
    • The Russian MoD notably is paying an abnormally high amount of fanfare to the claimed Russian seizure of Velyka Novosilka, very likely as part of informational efforts to shape Western perceptions of the battlefield situation in Ukraine and degrade international support for Ukraine.
    • The seizure and clearing of Velyka Novosilka will likely present opportunities and a decision point to the Russian military command on whether to redeploy elements of the Russian Eastern Military District [EMD] from the Velyka Novosilka area to other priority operational areas. Any redeployment of EMD elements from the Velyka Novosilka area over the coming weeks will indicate the Russian military command’s priority operational areas for offensive operations in Spring and Summer 2025.
    • Russian forces are poised to seize Toretsk in the coming days and a redeployment of elements of the EMD to reinforce the Russian force grouping in the Toretsk direction would indicate a new Russian priority effort to resume attacks in the direction of Kostyantynivka.
    • Ukrainian forces conducted a second strike on the Ryazan Oil Refinery in Ryazan Oblast on the night of January 25 to 26.
    • Ukrainian forces advanced in Kursk Oblast and regained positions in Toretsk.
    • Russian forces recently advanced near Borova, Pokrovsk, and Kurakhove.
    • Russian milbloggers criticized the Russian government on January 25 for not prioritizing the recruitment and training of Russia’s next generation of military officers.

    We do not report in detail on Russian war crimes because these activities are well-covered in Western media and do not directly affect the military operations we are assessing and forecasting. We will continue to evaluate and report on the effects of these criminal activities on the Ukrainian military and the Ukrainian population and specifically on combat in Ukrainian urban areas. We utterly condemn Russian violations of the laws of armed conflict and the Geneva Conventions and crimes against humanity even though we do not describe them in these reports.

    • Ukrainian Operations in the Russian Federation
    • Russian Main Effort – Eastern Ukraine (comprised of three subordinate main efforts)
    • Russian Subordinate Main Effort #1 – Push Ukrainian forces back from the international border with Belgorod Oblast and approach to within tube artillery range of Kharkiv City
    • Russian Subordinate Main Effort #2 – Capture the remainder of Luhansk Oblast and push westward into eastern Kharkiv Oblast and encircle northern Donetsk Oblast
    • Russian Subordinate Main Effort #3 – Capture the entirety of Donetsk Oblast
    • Russian Supporting Effort – Southern Axis
    • Russian Air, Missile, and Drone Campaign
    • Russian Mobilization and Force Generation Efforts
    • Russian Technological Adaptations
    • Activities in Russian-occupied areas
    • Significant Activity in Belarus

    Ukrainian Operations in the Russian Federation

    Ukrainian forces recently marginally advanced in Kursk Oblast amid continued fighting in the Ukrainian salient on January 26. Geolocated footage published on January 26 indicates that Ukrainian forces recently marginally advanced in central Pogrebki (north of Sudzha) and in the forested area northwest of Kositsa (northeast of Sudzha).[25] Russian milbloggers claimed that Ukrainian forces conducted counterattacks near Pogrebki.[26] Elements of the Russian 106th and 76th airborne (VDV) divisions, including the 76th VDV Division’s 234th VDV Regiment, are reportedly operating in Kursk Oblast; elements of the 34th Motorized Rifle Brigade (49th Combined Arms Army [CAA], Southern Military District [SMD]) are reportedly operating near Pogrebki; and elements of the 1427th Motorized Rifle Regiment (formed during 2022 partial reserve call up) are reportedly operating near Kositsa (north of Sudzha).[27]

    Russian sources claimed on January 26 that Ukrainian forces unsuccessfully attempted to cross the Russian-Ukrainian international border towards Tetkino (west of the main Ukrainian salient in Kursk Oblast), and some milbloggers characterized the Ukrainian activity as a reconnaissance-in-force mission.[28]

    Russian Main Effort – Eastern Ukraine

    Russian Subordinate Main Effort #1 – Kharkiv Oblast (Russian objective: Push Ukrainian forces back from the international border with Belgorod Oblast and approach to within tube artillery range of Kharkiv City)

    Russian forces continued ground attacks northeast of Kharkiv City near Vovchansk on January 26 but did not advance.[29] Ukraine’s Khortytsia Group of Forces reported on January 26 that Ukrainian forces destroyed four Russian infantry fighting vehicles in the Vovchansk direction.[30]

    Russian Subordinate Main Effort #2 – Luhansk Oblast (Russian objective: Capture the remainder of Luhansk Oblast and push westward into eastern Kharkiv Oblast and northern Donetsk Oblast)

    Russian forces continued offensive operations in the Kupyansk direction on January 26 but did not make any confirmed advances. Ukrainian units operating in the Kupyansk direction posted footage on January 25 showing Russian forces conducting a reinforced platoon-sized mechanized assault near Pishchane (southeast of Kupyansk) towards Kupyansk-Vuzlovyi (west of Pishchane) and reported that Ukrainian forces destroyed all four armored personnel carriers involved in the assault.[31] The commander of a Ukrainian battalion operating in the Kupyansk direction stated that Russian forces were trying to cross the Oskil River and expand their bridgehead near Dvorichna (north of Kupyansk).[32] The commander noted that Russian forces cannot conduct a full-scale river crossing with heavy equipment as the river is not frozen, so groups of five to eight people cross the river in small boats during the night or foggy weather, after which they wait at a concentration point in forested areas for reinforcements to arrive. Russian forces conducted offensive operations east of Kupyansk near Stepova Novoselivka and Petropavlivka, southeast of Kupyansk near Pishchane, and south of Kupyansk near Hlushkivka on January 25 and 26.[33]

    Russian forces recently advanced in the Borova direction amid continued Russian offensive operations in the area on January 26. Geolocated footage published on January 26 shows Russian soldiers raising a Russian flag in eastern Tverdokhlibove (southeast of Borova), indicating that Russian forces recently advanced to the eastern part of the settlement and seized Novoyehorivka (just east of Tverdokhlibove).[34] Russian milbloggers claimed that Russian forces advanced in the fields northwest of Novoyehorivka, in the fields northwest and west of Makiivka (southeast of Borova), and 400 meters from Makiivka towards Hrekivka (just west of Makiivka).[35] ISW has not observed confirmation of these claims, however. Russian forces continued ground attacks northeast of Borova near Kolisnykivka, Nova Kruhlyakivka, Lozova, Zelenyi Hai, and Zahryzove; east of Borova near Nadiya, Pershotravneve, and Kopanky and in the direction of Shyikivka; and southeast of Borova near Hrekivka, Makiivka, Novoserhiivka, Druzhelyubivka, Tverdokhlibove, and Novoyehorivka on January 25 and 26.[36] The commander for a Ukrainian battalion operating in the Kupyansk and Borova directions stated on January 26 that Ukrainian forces repelled Russian advances near Kolisnykivka and toward Zahryzove and that Ukrainian forces destroyed almost all of the equipment that Russian forces used in four mechanized assaults in the area between January 23 to 26.[37]

    Russian forces continued offensive operations in the Lyman direction on January 26 but did not make any confirmed advances. A Russian milblogger claimed that Russian forces advanced to the outskirts of Kolodyazi (northeast of Lyman) after repelling Ukrainian counterattacks.[38] Another Russian milblogger claimed that Russian forces are unsuccessfully trying to enter Kolodyazi in small groups.[39] Russian forces conducted offensive operations northeast of Lyman near Kolodyazi, Yampolivka, Terny, Ivanivka, and Novolyubivka and east of Lyman near Torske on January 25 and 26.[40] A Russian milblogger claimed that Ukrainian forces counterattacked in Torske.[41] The spokesperson of a Ukrainian brigade operating in the Lyman direction stated that Russian forces rarely conduct mechanized assaults but are almost constantly attacking in teams of two to three people.[42] The spokesperson stated that Russian forces are using a tactic in which an unarmed Russian servicemember storms Ukrainian positions first in order to identify Ukrainian firing positions, after which well-trained servicemembers begin attacking. Drone operators of the Russian 16th Spetsnaz Brigade (Russian General Staff’s Main Directorate [GRU]) are reportedly operating near Zarichne (east of Lyman).[43]

    Russian Subordinate Main Effort #3 – Donetsk Oblast (Russian objective: Capture the entirety of Donetsk Oblast, the claimed territory of Russia’s proxies in Donbas)

    Russian forces continued offensive operations east of Siversk near Verkhnokamyanske on January 25 and 26 but did not advance.[44] An officer of a Ukrainian National Guard battalion operating in the Siversk direction reported on January 25 that Russian forces are attaching nets to Mavic drones to disable Ukrainian drones but are still working on improving the effectiveness of the nets.[45] The Ukrainian officer also reported that Russian and Ukrainian forces have parity in terms of quantity of drones and that Russian forces could be suffering from equipment shortages since Russian forces are trying to recover all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), electronic warfare (EW) systems, mopeds, or damaged armored vehicles from the front.

    Russian forces continued offensive operations in the Chasiv Yar direction on January 26 but did not make any confirmed advances. A Russian milblogger claimed that Russian forces advanced to Tsentralna Street in western Chasiv Yar and on the southern outskirts of the settlement, but ISW has not observed confirmation of these claims.[46] Russian forces continued ground attacks near Chasiv Yar itself; north of Chasiv Yar near Orikhovo-Vasylivka and towards Novomarkove; and south of Chasiv Yar near Stupochky, Bila Hora, and Predtechyne on January 25 and 26.[47] A spokesperson for a Ukrainian brigade operating in the Chasiv Yar direction stated on January 26 that the elements of the Russian 98th Airborne (VDV) Division operating in and near Chasiv Yar are well trained and that Chechen “Akhmat” Spetsnaz elements that include former Wagner Group and “Rusich” Russian Sabotage Assault Reconnaissance Group soldiers are reinforcing the airborne elements.[48] The Ukrainian spokesperson stated that Russian forces are conducting small group infantry assaults daily and are taking advantage of times when Ukrainian forces decrease their use of drones due to fog and precipitation to attack. Ukraine’s Khortytsia Group of Forces Spokesperson Major Viktor Trehubov stated that Russian forces are hiding and moving around in pipes near the Siverskyi Donets Donbas Canal. Elements of the Russian 27th Artillery Regiment (6th Motorized Rifle Division, 3rd Army Corps [AC]) are reportedly operating in the Chasiv Yar direction.[49]

    Ukrainian forces recently regained limited positions in Toretsk amid ongoing Russian assaults in the settlement on January 26. Geolocated footage published on January 26 indicates that Ukrainian forces recently regained limited positions in northwestern Toretsk.[50] A Ukrainian battalion commander operating in the Toretsk direction reported that Ukrainian forces maintain positions within the administrative boundaries of Toretsk.[51] Russian milbloggers claimed that Russian forces are advancing in Krymske (north of Toretsk) and Petrivka (west of Toretsk), but ISW has not observed confirmation of this claim.[52] Russian forces continued assaults near and within Toretsk, including near the Toretska Mine in northern Toretsk, on January 25 and 26.[53] Elements of the Russian 132nd Motorized Rifle Brigade (51st Combined Arms Army [CAA], formerly 1st Donetsk People’s Republic [DNR] AC) reportedly continue to operate in Toretsk.[54]

    Russian forces recently marginally advanced west of Pokrovsk amid ongoing offensive operations in the Pokrovsk direction on January 26. Geolocated footage published on January 25 indicates that Russian forces recently marginally advanced in the fields north of Kotlyne (west of Pokrovsk).[55] The spokesperson of a Ukrainian National Guard Brigade operating in the Pokrovsk direction stated that Russian forces are transporting infantry on armored vehicles towards Ukrainian positions and are using several tanks to provide fire support for each group of disembarking infantry.[56] The Russian MoD claimed that Russian forces seized Zelene (south of Pokrovsk), and ISW assessed that Russian forces seized the settlement as of January 21.[57] Russian milbloggers claimed that Russian forces advanced further west of Kotlyne and seized a nearby mineshaft, advanced in the fields south of Udachne (west of Pokrovsk), south of Novoyelyzavetivka (southwest of Pokrovsk) and gained a foothold in eastern and southern Nadiivka (southwest of Pokrovsk), but ISW has not observed confirmation of these claims.[58] A Russian source claimed that Russian forces are attempting to bypass and envelop Yelyzavetivka (east of Pokrovsk).[59] Russian forces continued assault near Pokrovsk itself; east of Pokrovsk near Vozdvyzhenka, Vodyane Druhe, Myrolyubivka, Yelyzavetivka, and Promin; southeast of Pokrovsk near Lysivka; south of Pokrovsk near Zelene, Novoukrainka, and Zvirove; west of Pokrovsk near Udachne and Kotlyne; and southwest of Pokrovsk near Novovasylivka, Novooleksandrivka, Uspenivka, Novoserhiivka, Nadiivka, and Bohdanivka on January 25 and 26.[60] Elements of the Russian 35th Motorized Rifle Brigade (41st CAA, Central Military District [CMD]) and drone operators of the Russian Rubicon Center for Advanced Unmanned Technologies and the “Vega” Spetsnaz Detachment (24th Guards Spetsnaz Brigade, Main Intelligence Directorate of the Russian General Staff [GRU]) are reportedly operating in the Pokrovsk direction.[61]

    Russian forces recently advanced in the Kurakhove direction amid continued offensive operations in the area on January 26. Geolocated footage published on January 26 indicates that Russian forces recently advanced to the eastern outskirts of Dachne (west of Kurakhove).[62] Russian milbloggers claimed that Russian forces advanced north, east, and south of Sribne (northwest of Kurakhove); into Andriivka (west of Kurakhove); to northern Dachne; and north and northeast of Sukhi Yaly (southwest of Kurakhove).[63] A Russian source claimed that Russian forces attacked after artillery preparation north and south of Ulakly (west of Kurakhove) and advanced as part of efforts to close the Ukrainian pocket in the area.[64] ISW has not observed confirmation of these claims, however. Russian forces continued assaults northwest of Kurakhove near Sribne and Shevchenko; west of Kurakhove near Andriivka, Kostyantynopil and Dachne; and southwest of Kurakhove near Kostyantynopolske, Yantarne, and Ulakly on January 25 and 26.[65] Elements of the Russian 68th Reconnaissance Battalion (20th Motorized Rifle Division, 8th CAA, Southern Military District [SMD]) are reportedly operating near Dachne; elements of the 114th Motorized Rifle Brigade (51st CAA) and 238th Artillery Brigade (8th CAA, SMD) are reportedly operating near Andriivka; and elements of the 200th Artillery Brigade (29th CAA, Eastern Military District [EMD]) and 39th Motorized Rifle Brigade (68th AC, EMD) are reportedly operating near the Sukhi Yaly River (southwest of Kurakhove).[66]

    See topline text for updates on the Velyka Novosilka area.

    Russian Supporting Effort – Southern Axis (Russian objective: Maintain frontline positions and secure rear areas against Ukrainian strikes)

    Neither Ukrainian nor Russian sources reported Russian offensive operations in the Zaporizhia direction on January 26. A spokesperson for a Ukrainian brigade operating in the Zaporizhia direction stated that Russian forces are using fiber optic drones more frequently.[67]

    Russian forces continued assaults in the Kherson direction, including on Zabych and Kozatskyi islands (southwest and east of Kherson City, respectively) in the Dnipro River Delta, on January 25 and 26 but did not advance.[68]

    Russian Air, Missile, and Drone Campaign (Russian Objective: Target Ukrainian military and civilian infrastructure in the rear and on the frontline)

    Russian forces conducted a series of drone and missile strikes against Ukraine on the night of January 25 to 26. The Ukrainian Air Force reported that Russian forces launched 72 Shahed and decoy drones from Oryol, Kursk, and Bryansk oblasts; and Millerovo, Rostov Oblast, and Primorsko-Akhtarsk, Krasnodar Krai.[69] The Ukrainian Air Force reported that Ukrainian forces downed 50 drones over Kyiv, Odesa, Kharkiv, Poltava, Sumy, Donetsk, Dnipropetrovsk, and Khmelnytskyi oblasts; that nine decoy drones were “lost” in location, likely due to Ukrainian electronic warfare (EW) interference; and that one drone was still in the air as of 0900 local time. Ukrainian officials reported that Russian drones damaged civilian infrastructure in Sumy City overnight and damaged residential buildings and vehicles in Shevchenkivskyi, Kyivskyi, Kholodnohirskyi, and Osnovyanskyi raions of Kharkiv City overnight and on January 26.[70]

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky reported on January 26 that Russian forces launched 1,250 glide bombs, over 750 first-person view (FPV) drones, and over 220 missiles against Ukraine from January 20 to 26.[71] The Ukrainian Air Force reported that Ukrainian air defenses downed two guided aircraft missiles, 375 Shaheds, 71 reconnaissance drones, and 59 other drones over Ukraine from January 20 to 26.[72]

    Russian Mobilization and Force Generation Efforts (Russian objective: Expand combat power without conducting general mobilization)

    Russian milbloggers criticized the Russian government on January 25 for not prioritizing the recruitment and training of Russia’s next generation of military officers. One Russian milblogger claimed that current Russian youth are more patriotic than previous generations, but a second milblogger claimed that the Russian government is failing to take advantage of this trend and criticized Russian youth for highlighting issues in the Russian military without joining the military or working to develop solutions.[73] The second milblogger criticized Russian military academies for prioritizing state awards over properly training cadets and claimed that the Russian military expelled many contract servicemembers who joined the military in 2024 due to behavioral or training issues. A third milblogger noted that the Russian military does not pay cadets a livable wage and accused the Russian military command of being careless towards the future of the Russian officer corps.[74] A Kremlin-affiliated Russian milblogger noted that the Russian government needs to adjust its youth policies and propaganda.[75]

    Russian Technological Adaptations (Russian objective: Introduce technological innovations to optimize systems for use in Ukraine)

    Nothing significant to report.

    Activities in Russian-occupied areas (Russian objective: Consolidate administrative control of annexed areas; forcibly integrate Ukrainian citizens into Russian sociocultural, economic, military, and governance systems)

    ISW is not publishing coverage of activities in Russian-occupied areas today.

    Significant activity in Belarus (Russian efforts to increase its military presence in Belarus and further integrate Belarus into Russian-favorable frameworks)

    Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko won the January 26 Belarusian presidential election with a purported 87.6 percent of the vote in an election that was neither free nor fair.[76] Belarusians did not participate in widespread mass protests – a departure from the mass unrest that followed Lukashenko’s rigged electoral victory in the 2020 presidential election.[77] Exiled Belarusian opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya called on Belarusians to refrain from protesting ahead of the election, citing the heightened risk of severe repercussions.[78] Lukashenko’s regime has attempted to minimize the risk of wide-spread protests in recent years, including by rescheduling the presidential election from their usual timing in the summer to the winter, restricting internet access during the voting period, and introducing increasingly repressive policies to disincentivize opposition parties since 2020.[79]

    The Russian government continues to erode Belarusian sovereignty by increasing its permanent military presence and deploying missile systems in Belarus. Lukashenko claimed on January 26 that Russian Oreshnik ballistic missiles would arrive in Belarus “any day now.”[80] Lukashenko claimed that Russia may deploy the Oreshniks to a Belarusian city, such as Orsha close to Smolensk City in western Russia.[81] Lukashenko asserted that Russia’s deployment of Oreshnik missiles to Belarus is a direct response to US missile deployments in Europe and claimed that the Oreshnik missiles will protect Belarus.[82] Lukashenko likely hopes to assert some form of control over Russia’s use of the Oreshnik missiles deployed to Belarus to buttress Belarus’ waning sovereignty, but Moscow will likely retain operational control over the missiles and their use. ISW continues to assess that the deployment of Oreshnik medium-range ballistic missiles to Belarusian territory does not fundamentally alter Russian military capabilities vis-à-vis Europe and Ukraine, as Russia has long maintained weapons systems with similar payloads and longer ranges in Kaliningrad and elsewhere in mainland Russia.[83]

    Note: ISW does not receive any classified material from any source, uses only publicly available information, and draws extensively on Russian, Ukrainian, and Western reporting and social media as well as commercially available satellite imagery and other geospatial data as the basis for these reports. References to all sources used are provided in the endnotes of each update.

     

    [1] https://t.me/ombr_110/428; https://t.me/creamy_caprice/8225; https://t.me/WarArchive_ua/25056

    [2] https://t.me/voenkorKotenok/61673; https://t.me/DnevnikDesantnika/22967; https://t.me/mod_russia/48249 ; https://t.me/dva_majors/63154; https://t.me/rybar/67485 ; https://t.me/RVvoenkor/85150; https://t.me/motopatriot78/31587; https://t.me/yurasumy/20774; https://t.me/milinfolive/140590; https://t.me/NgP_raZVedka/20451; https://t.me/boris_rozhin/152575

    [3] https://t.me/rybar/67485; https://t.me/milinfolive/140590; https://t.me/NgP_raZVedka/20451

    [4] https://suspilne dot media/donbas/933659-ci-okupuvali-rosijski-vijska-veliku-novosilku-na-doneccini/

    [5] https://t.me/ombr_110/428

    [6] https://t.me/ombr_110/428

    [7] https://t.me/GeneralStaffZSU/20265; https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid0nG3CVrZjCv4Khhww5wZvgvikfy3kuC7b8akFdsqcgbsbBMu1qoAFxQbhceZ9HNAYl ; https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid02EkjXwbSWHv3n66yBGKfpBhkG3vkUSgBU1ivsgkKXWvjdqR8hUvqq3tNQR586GYTel; https://t.me/Khortytsky_wind/4501

    [8] https://t.me/mod_russia/48244

    [9] https://t.me/mod_russia/48249; https://t.me/mod_russia/48251

    [10] https://t.me/mod_russia/48252

    [11] https://t.me/RVvoenkor/85113; https://t.me/RVvoenkor/85127; https://t.me/RVvoenkor/85150

    [12] https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-january-18-2025

    [13] https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-february-10-2023

    [14] https://isw.pub/UkrWar100124 ; https://isw.pub/UkrWar111124

    [15] https://isw.pub/UkrWar111224

    [16] https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-january-7-2025

    [17] https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-january-7-2025 ; https://t.me/yurasumy/20779 ; https://t.me/DnevnikDesantnika/22909 ; https://t.me/boris_rozhin/152367

    [18] https://understandingwar.org/backgrounder/ukrainian-defense-pokrovsk-has-compelled-russia-change-its-approach-eastern-ukraine

    [19]https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid08fzAxCYd6LhXpXHCQx2iWhVRJ44GnmQFd6jDifAM2mm6ieFWMwReR9cY5XNjfoUXl

    [20] https://x.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1883296910771167659; https://t.me/WarArchive_ua/25036; https://x.com/cyber_boroshno/status/1883306551571861671; https://t.me/kiber_boroshno/10978

    [21] https://t.me/mod_russia/48237

    [22] https://t.me/pavelmalkov_official/3809

    [23] https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-january-24-2025 ; https://t.me/akovalenko1989/8669 ;

    [24] https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-january-24-2025

    [25]https://t.me/RVvoenkor/85142 ; https://x.com/moklasen/status/1883518414247100659 ; https://t.me/motopatriot78/31594 ; https://x.com/moklasen/status/1883523352238952947

    [26] https://t.me/dva_majors/63154 ; https://t.me/wargonzo/24453 ; https://t.me/motopatriot78/31591

    [27]https://t.me/RVvoenkor/85115 ; https://t.me/motopatriot78/31594 ; https://x.com/moklasen/status/1883523352238952947; https://t.me/motopatriot78/31594; https://t.me/boris_rozhin/152578 ; https://t.me/RVvoenkor/85142; https://x.com/moklasen/status/1883518414247100659 ; https://t.me/RVvoenkor/85120

    [28] https://t.me/RVvoenkor/85147; https://t.me/warriorofnorth/5742; https://t.me/vysokygovorit/18667; https://t.me/dva_majors/63210; https://t.me/sashakots/51516; https://t.me/tass_agency/297732

    [29]https://t.me/GeneralStaffZSU/20265 ; https://t.me/Khortytsky_wind/4521 ; https://t.me/otukharkiv/3870

    [30] https://t.me/Khortytsky_wind/4521

    [31] https://t.me/fedorenkoys/914 ; https://armyinform.com dot ua/2025/01/25/zgorily-pid-kupyanskom-vorozhyj-shturm-zakinchyvsya-znyshhennyam-4-btriv/; https://t.me/ngu_3027/3612

    [32] https://armyinform.com dot ua/2025/01/26/okupanty-na-chovnah-v-tumani-nashi-vijskovi-poyasnyly-chomu-okupanty-namagayutsya-forsuvaty-oskil-unochi/

    [33] https://t.me/GeneralStaffZSU/20265; https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid0nG3CVrZjCv4Khhww5wZvgvikfy3kuC7b8akFdsqcgbsbBMu1qoAFxQbhceZ9HNAYl ; https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid02EkjXwbSWHv3n66yBGKfpBhkG3vkUSgBU1ivsgkKXWvjdqR8hUvqq3tNQR586GYTel; https://t.me/Khortytsky_wind/4501

    [34] https://t.me/creamy_caprice/8226; https://t.me/svarkapogruzka/4904

    [35] https://t.me/motopatriot78/31589; https://t.me/rybar/67469; https://t.me/DnevnikDesantnika/22957  

    [36] https://t.me/GeneralStaffZSU/20265; https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid0nG3CVrZjCv4Khhww5wZvgvikfy3kuC7b8akFdsqcgbsbBMu1qoAFxQbhceZ9HNAYl; https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid02EkjXwbSWHv3n66yBGKfpBhkG3vkUSgBU1ivsgkKXWvjdqR8hUvqq3tNQR586GYTel; https://t.me/Khortytsky_wind/4501 

    [37] https://armyinform.com dot ua/2025/01/26/zsu-vidbyly-4-mehanizovani-shturmy-ta-znyshhyly-95-tehniky-na-kupyanskomu-napryamku-protyvnyk-posylyv-nastup/; https://t.me/ButusovPlus/16896

    [38] https://t.me/voenkorKotenok/61665

    [39] https://t.me/yurasumy/20781

    [40] https://t.me/GeneralStaffZSU/20265; https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid0nG3CVrZjCv4Khhww5wZvgvikfy3kuC7b8akFdsqcgbsbBMu1qoAFxQbhceZ9HNAYl ; https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid02EkjXwbSWHv3n66yBGKfpBhkG3vkUSgBU1ivsgkKXWvjdqR8hUvqq3tNQR586GYTel; https://t.me/Khortytsky_wind/4501; https://t.me/rybar/67469; https://t.me/DnevnikDesantnika/22957

    [41] https://t.me/DnevnikDesantnika/22957

    [42] https://armyinform.com dot ua/2025/01/26/rozvidka-zhyvczem-u-sylah-oborony-rozpovily-pro-taktyku-voroga-na-lymanskomu-napryamku/

    [43] https://t.me/boris_rozhin/152525

    [44] https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid0nG3CVrZjCv4Khhww5wZvgvikfy3kuC7b8akFdsqcgbsbBMu1qoAFxQbhceZ9HNAYl; https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid02EkjXwbSWHv3n66yBGKfpBhkG3vkUSgBU1ivsgkKXWvjdqR8hUvqq3tNQR586GYTel; https://t.me/Khortytsky_wind/4501

    [45] https://youtu.be/WaqfrINNtf0 ; https://suspilne dot media/donbas/933547-ciplaut-sitki-na-droni-ta-poluut-na-ukrainski-droni-vijskovij-rozpoviv-pro-situaciu-na-siverskomu-napramku/

    [46] https://t.me/DnevnikDesantnika/22950

    [47] https://t.me/GeneralStaffZSU/20265; https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid0nG3CVrZjCv4Khhww5wZvgvikfy3kuC7b8akFdsqcgbsbBMu1qoAFxQbhceZ9HNAYl; https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid02EkjXwbSWHv3n66yBGKfpBhkG3vkUSgBU1ivsgkKXWvjdqR8hUvqq3tNQR586GYTel; https://t.me/Khortytsky_wind/4501 

    [48] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4XONrDJWsc ; https://suspilne dot media/donbas/930803-na-napramku-zavilis-kolisni-vagnerivci-rf-sodenno-sturmue-casiv-ar/

    [49] https://t.me/sashakots/51514

    [50] https://x.com/AudaxonX/status/1883553874805747888; https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2585472334976132

    [51] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WY8sDvZdWEA ; https://armyinform.com dot ua/2025/01/25/vykonuyut-funkcziyu-prymanky-v-toreczku-kydayut-v-ataky-solyanky-iz-pryrechenyh-na-smert/

    [52] https://t.me/dva_majors/63154 ; https://t.me/boris_rozhin/152546 ; https://t.me/DnevnikDesantnika/22955

    [53] https://t.me/GeneralStaffZSU/20265 ; https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid0nG3CVrZjCv4Khhww5wZvgvikfy3kuC7b8akFdsqcgbsbBMu1qoAFxQbhceZ9HNAYl

     ; https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid02EkjXwbSWHv3n66yBGKfpBhkG3vkUSgBU1ivsgkKXWvjdqR8hUvqq3tNQR586GYTel ; https://t.me/Khortytsky_wind/4501 ; https://t.me/DnevnikDesantnika/22955 ; https://t.me/yurasumy/20780

    [54] https://t.me/RVvoenkor/85122 ; https://t.me/nm_dnr/13302

    [55] https://t.me/creamy_caprice/8222; https://t.me/skarlatop/4420

    [56] https://youtu.be/iIjUshqoYXE ; https://armyinform.com dot ua/2025/01/25/pidviz-na-toj-svit-pid-pokrovskom-rosiyany-vezut-svoyu-pihotu-vprytul-do-nashyh-pozyczij/

    [57] https://t.me/mod_russia/48246 ; https://understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-january-21-2025

    [58] https://t.me/voenkorKotenok/61677 ; https://t.me/voenkorKotenok/61671 ; https://t.me/motopatriot78/31597 ; https://t.me/Sever_Z/9442

    [59] https://t.me/voenkorKotenok/61671

    [60] https://t.me/GeneralStaffZSU/20265 ; https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid0nG3CVrZjCv4Khhww5wZvgvikfy3kuC7b8akFdsqcgbsbBMu1qoAFxQbhceZ9HNAYl ; https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid02EkjXwbSWHv3n66yBGKfpBhkG3vkUSgBU1ivsgkKXWvjdqR8hUvqq3tNQR586GYTel ; https://t.me/Khortytsky_wind/4501 ; https://t.me/voenkorKotenok/61677 ; https://t.me/voenkorKotenok/61671 ; https://t.me/voenkorKotenok/61666 ; https://t.me/dva_majors/63154

    [61] https://t.me/tass_agency/297676; https://t.me/mod_russia/48243 ; https://t.me/mod_russia/48236; https://t.me/RVvoenkor/85129 ; https://t.me/sashakots/51513

    [62] https://t.me/creamy_caprice/8228; https://t.me/ssternenko/39246

    [63] https://t,me/RVvoenkor/85118; https://t.me/rybar/67477; https://t.me/yurasumy/20776; https://t.me/boris_rozhin/152546; https://t.me/z_arhiv/30722 ; https://t.me/yurasumy/20772

    [64] https://t.me/voenkorKotenok/61671

    [65] https://t.me/GeneralStaffZSU/20265 ; https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid0nG3CVrZjCv4Khhww5wZvgvikfy3kuC7b8akFdsqcgbsbBMu1qoAFxQbhceZ9HNAYl ; https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid02EkjXwbSWHv3n66yBGKfpBhkG3vkUSgBU1ivsgkKXWvjdqR8hUvqq3tNQR586GYTel ; https://t.me/Khortytsky_wind/4501; https://t.me/yurasumy/20775; https://t.me/yurasumy/20776; https://t.me/boris_rozhin/152481

    [66] https://t.me/rusich_army/20382 ; https://t.me/dva_majors/63189 https://t.me/yurasumy/20772; https://t.me/voin_dv/12999 ; https://t.me/voin_dv/13002; https://t.me/nm_dnr/13303

    [67] https://youtu.be/JFvyCBahZ_k ; https://armyinform.com dot ua/2025/01/25/ruky-vgoru-bagnety-v-zemlyu-na-zaporizkomu-napryamku-drony-prodovzhuyut-polonyty-rosiyan/

    [68] https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid0nG3CVrZjCv4Khhww5wZvgvikfy3kuC7b8akFdsqcgbsbBMu1qoAFxQbhceZ9HNAYl; https://www.facebook.com/GeneralStaff.ua/posts/pfbid02EkjXwbSWHv3n66yBGKfpBhkG3vkUSgBU1ivsgkKXWvjdqR8hUvqq3tNQR586GYTel; https://t.me/SJTF_Odes/11994

    [69] https://youtu.be/JFvyCBahZ_k ; https://armyinform.com dot ua/2025/01/25/ruky-vgoru-bagnety-v-zemlyu-na-zaporizkomu-napryamku-drony-prodovzhuyut-polonyty-rosiyan/

    [70] https://t.me/synegubov/12797 ; https://t.me/ihor_terekhov/2080; https://t.me/Sumy_news_ODA/33207 ; https://armyinform.com dot ua/2025/01/26/nichnyj-teror-dronamy-mista-sumy-pid-udarom-zaklad-osvity-ta-bagatopoverhivky/

    [71] https://t.me/V_Zelenskiy_official/13078 

    [72] https://t.me/kpszsu/27561

    [73] https://t.me/AlexCarrier/10374 ; https://t.me/Mestb_Dobroj_Voli/14196 ; https://t.me/dva_majors/63141 ; https://t.me/Mestb_Dobroj_Voli/14195

    [74] https://t.me/dva_majors/63142

    [75] https://t.me/rybar/67470

    [76] https://www.politico.eu/article/alexander-lukashenko-wins-sham-election-in-belarus/ ; https://belta dot by/society/view/stali-izvestny-itogi-ekzitpola-na-vyborah-prezidenta-belarusi-691645-2025/

    [77] https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russia-review-turmoil-belarus-benefits-kremlin

    [78] https://www.svoboda dot org/a/poslednie-vybory-lukashenko-zachem-ustroili-golosovanie-v-belarusi/33287316.html

    [79] https://eutoday dot net/belarus-sets-presidential-election-date-for-january-2025/ ; https://understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-january-25-2025

    [80] https://t.me/tass_agency/297712

    [81] https://t.me/tass_agency/297713 ; https://t.me/tass_agency/297714 ; https://t.me/modmilby/44636

    [82] https://t.me/tass_agency/297714 ; https://t.me/tass_agency/297704 ; https://t.me/modmilby/44635

    [83] https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-november-29-2024

     





    Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, January 26, 2025

    As tensions continue to escalate in Eastern Europe, the Russian military has launched a large-scale offensive campaign in the region. The latest assessment of the campaign as of January 26, 2025, shows a significant advancement of Russian forces into neighboring countries.

    Russian troops have reportedly crossed the borders of Ukraine, Belarus, and Moldova, sparking fears of a wider conflict in the region. The offensive campaign has been met with strong resistance from local forces, leading to intense fighting in key strategic areas.

    The Russian military has deployed a combination of ground troops, armored vehicles, and air support in its offensive operations. The use of advanced weaponry and tactics has allowed Russian forces to make rapid advances in the region.

    However, Western countries have raised concerns about the escalating conflict and have called for a diplomatic resolution to the crisis. The United Nations Security Council is set to convene an emergency meeting to discuss the situation and explore possible avenues for de-escalation.

    As the situation continues to unfold, it remains unclear how the conflict will evolve in the coming days. The international community is closely monitoring the situation and is working towards a peaceful resolution to the crisis.

    Stay tuned for further updates on the Russian offensive campaign assessment as the situation develops.

    Tags:

    Russian offensive campaign, Russia military tactics, January 26 2025 assessment, military strategy analysis, global security update, geopolitical conflict update, international relations update, military intelligence report.

    #Russian #Offensive #Campaign #Assessment #January

  • Jason Kelce fans the flames with brutal assessment of Commanders’ roster


    There is no love lost between the Washington Commanders and the Philadelphia Eagles. This weekend’s NFC Championship game has more significance, but it’s still a fierce division rivalry that ensures no quarter will be given by either club.

    Jason Kelce was a constant thorn in the Commanders’ side before his retirement following the 2023 campaign. The future Pro Football Hall of Fame center walked away from the game and is thriving across the media. But the Philadelphia roots run deep.

    Jason Kelce throws shade at Commanders roster before NFC Championship game

    Kelce didn’t hesitate to fan the flames heading into a pivotal final-four showdown at Lincoln Financial Field. The player-turned-analyst praised the Commanders for a superb run to reach this point. However, he threw shade at the talent at Dan Quinn’s disposal compared to his old employers.

    “I have not expected this Commanders’ team to be in this position all season long. I think that they have a tremendous quarterback who’s played really well as a rookie. And their coaches have done a phenomenal job. They have good players. I’ll be very candid… I think the Eagles are better at every position. I don’t know if there is one position — if you put the two rosters, the depth charts — next to each other, that I would take the Washington player over the Eagle player. And that is a very honest assessment.”

    Jason Kelce

    Kelce later went on to say it’ll be a tough game. The Commanders are well coached under Quinn and they make very few mistakes. He also highlighted their ability to sustain drives with jaw-dropping efficiency on fourth down. Even so, he’s highly confident that his beloved Eagles can get the job done comfortably to reach the Super Bowl.

    This is more bulletin board material for the Commanders. They’ve been written off and, in some cases, completely dismissed throughout the regular-season campaign and in the playoffs. They’ve passed every challenge so far. Don’t count them out from doing the same again.

    The Commanders and Eagles are familiar with one another. There will be a few new wrinkles from both teams, but this is all about winning individual battles and plowing through adversity as a team.

    That’s something Kelce didn’t take into account. The Commanders are battle-hardened. They almost always come through when the game is on the line and never back down from a fight. This sort of attitude or resolve in high-pressure situations won’t be found on any depth chart.

    Washington doesn’t need any more motivation. They haven’t been in this situation for more than three decades. Seizing the moment and silencing their doubters one more time on the road are the primary objectives.

    Kelce’s comments perfectly depict the feeling about Washington among Eagles fans. Shutting them up and confirming NFC East supremacy only sweetens the pot.

    While the Eagles were expected to be in this situation, that guarantees nothing. They still have to go out and earn it. They have also lost to the Commanders already this season. Not bad for a team supposedly talent-deficient compared to Philadelphia in every area.

    Let’s hope Kelce will be eating a large slice of humble pie when it’s all said and done.

    More Commanders news and analysis





    In a recent interview, Philadelphia Eagles center Jason Kelce didn’t hold back when discussing the Washington Commanders’ roster. Kelce, known for his fiery personality and outspoken nature, didn’t mince words when giving his assessment of the team’s talent.

    “Let’s be real here, the Commanders’ roster is lacking in nearly every position,” Kelce said. “They have a few standout players, sure, but overall, they are severely lacking in depth and talent. It’s going to be a tough road ahead for them if they don’t make some serious upgrades.”

    Kelce went on to criticize the Commanders’ front office for their lack of aggressive moves in the offseason, stating that they needed to do more to compete in the highly competitive NFC East division.

    “Look, I respect their efforts, but they need to step up their game if they want to be contenders,” Kelce added. “I’m not one to sugarcoat things, and right now, the Commanders are not in a position to make a serious playoff run.”

    It’s clear that Kelce’s comments have added fuel to the fire in the longstanding rivalry between the Eagles and the Commanders. Fans on both sides are sure to be buzzing about Kelce’s brutal assessment of Washington’s roster, and it will be interesting to see how the Commanders respond on the field.

    Tags:

    Jason Kelce, Commanders, roster, assessment, brutal, NFL, football, Philadelphia Eagles, Washington Commanders, player evaluation, criticism, analysis, sports commentary, NFL news

    #Jason #Kelce #fans #flames #brutal #assessment #Commanders #roster

  • CIA shifts assessment on Covid origins, saying lab leak likely caused outbreak


    The Central Intelligence Agency on Saturday said it has shifted its previous assessments and has concluded that it’s likely the Covid-19 virus was leaked from a Chinese lab before it became a global pandemic but added that the agency had “low confidence” in its judgment.

    “CIA assesses with low confidence that a research-related origin of the COVID-19 pandemic is more likely than a natural origin based on the available body of reporting,” a CIA spokesperson said in a statement. “CIA continues to assess that both research-related and natural origin scenarios of the COVID-19 pandemic remain plausible.”

    The spokesperson added that the agency has “low confidence in this judgement” and will continue to evaluate any new intelligence reporting or relevant information.

    For years, the CIA has said it was unclear whether the Covid pandemic emerged from human exposure to an infected animal or from an event at a research lab in China.

    U.S. intelligence agencies and other government departments have been divided over the origins of the virus. The FBI and the Energy Department have said it was likely the virus was the result of a lab leak, while other agencies assessed that natural human exposure to an infected animal was the most likely scenario. The CIA had been agnostic until now.

    The CIA’s assessment was not based on new intelligence but on analysts reviewing existing information, a source familiar with the matter told NBC News. The review was ordered in the closing weeks of the Biden administration and completed before President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the source said.

    Outgoing CIA Director William Burns had told analysts that instead of remaining neutral on the different theories about Covid’s origins, they should take a position — though he did not express a preference for which theory to support, the source said.

    The New York Times first reported on the circumstances of the new review.

    The new director of the spy agency, John Ratcliffe, who was nominated by President Donald Trump and confirmed to his post by the Senate this week, approved the declassification of the new assessment, the source said. Ratcliffe has long argued that the virus most likely emerged from a leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

    John Ratcliffe
    John Ratcliffe appears for a Senate Intelligence confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill on Jan. 15.Andrew Harnik / Getty Images

    Ratcliffe told Breitbart News in an interview posted Friday that he wanted the CIA to drop its neutral stance as to the origins of the virus and “get off the sidelines.”

    “One of the things that I’ve talked about a lot is addressing the threat from China on a number of fronts, and that goes back to why a million Americans died and why the Central Intelligence Agency has been sitting on the sidelines for five years in not making an assessment about the origins of COVID,” Ratcliffe said. “That’s a day-one thing for me.”

    “I’ve been on record, as you know, in saying I think our intelligence, our science, and our common sense all really dictates that the origins of COVID was a leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” he said. “But the CIA has not made that assessment or at least not made that assessment publicly. So I’m going to focus on that and look at the intelligence and make sure that the public is aware that the agency is going to get off the sidelines.”

    Ratcliffe, who served as director of national intelligence during Trump’s first term, said he would ensure the president is armed with the best intelligence available when he deals with China.

    “As President Trump deals with [Chinese] President Xi [Jinping], he needs to be armed with the very best intelligence and to be able to talk about China in a way that if they caused or contributed to the death of a million Americans, the president needs to be armed with that,” Ratcliffe said.

    The Wuhan Institute of Virology has faced questions over its previous research into bat coronaviruses and alleged security lapses. The Covid-19 virus was first detected in Wuhan in 2019.

    China has accused the United States of trying to “smear” Beijing with what it calls false allegations about the virus’ origins and has insisted it has been transparent about the outbreak.



    The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has recently shifted its assessment on the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic, stating that a lab leak is likely the cause of the outbreak. This new assessment comes as more evidence has emerged pointing towards the Wuhan Institute of Virology as a possible source of the virus.

    The CIA’s change in stance is significant, as it contradicts the previous narrative that the virus originated from a wet market in Wuhan. This shift in assessment raises questions about the transparency and accountability of the Chinese government, as they have been accused of withholding crucial information about the origins of the virus.

    As investigations continue and more information comes to light, it is important to consider all possible scenarios in order to prevent future pandemics. The CIA’s new assessment is a reminder of the importance of thorough and unbiased investigations into the origins of Covid-19.

    Tags:

    CIA assessment, Covid origins, lab leak, outbreak, Covid-19, CIA report, pandemic origins, Covid investigation, lab leak theory, coronavirus origins, CIA findings

    #CIA #shifts #assessment #Covid #origins #lab #leak #caused #outbreak

  • Lead schedules series of informational meetings about special assessment | Local News







    The City of [City Name] will be holding a series of informational meetings about a proposed special assessment for residents in certain neighborhoods. The meetings, led by city officials and experts, will provide details about the special assessment, its purpose, and how it will benefit the community.

    Residents are encouraged to attend these meetings to learn more about the special assessment and ask any questions they may have. The schedule for the meetings is as follows:

    – [Date and Time of Meeting 1]
    – [Location of Meeting 1]

    – [Date and Time of Meeting 2]
    – [Location of Meeting 2]

    – [Date and Time of Meeting 3]
    – [Location of Meeting 3]

    These meetings will be an important opportunity for residents to get informed and engaged in the decision-making process regarding the special assessment. We hope to see you there!

    Tags:

    lead schedules, informational meetings, special assessment, local news, community events, neighborhood updates, property taxes, community involvement, town hall meetings, public forums, community feedback, civic engagement

    #Lead #schedules #series #informational #meetings #special #assessment #Local #News

  • ISW Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, Map and Update, January 29, 2025


    Key Takeaways from the ISW:

    • Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief General Oleksandr Syrskyi reported on January 20 that Russian forces suffered more than 434,000 casualties in 2024 — 150,000 of which were personnel killed in action.
    • Russian President Vladimir Putin reiterated on January 20 that the Kremlin is willing to negotiate with the United States about the war in Ukraine but indicated that he maintains his demands for Ukraine’s full capitulation.
    • Ukrainian forces reportedly struck an aircraft production plant in Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan on January 20 as a part of an ongoing series of strikes aimed at degrading Russian military capacity.
    • Ukrainian strikes against Russian defense industrial base (DIB) targets are reportedly affecting Russian forces’ combat capabilities.
    • Moldovan and Transnistrian authorities continue efforts to supply Transnistria with European gas.
    • Russian forces recently advanced near Toretsk, Pokrovsk, and Kurakhove.
    • A Russian milblogger and former Storm-Z instructor repeated on January 20 complaints that Russian milbloggers first issued in May 2024 about insufficient quality controls on Russian artillery shells.

    Authors: Angelica Evans, Davit Gasparyan, Olivia Gibson, Nate Trotter, William Runkel, and George Barros.

    See the original here.



    ISW Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, Map and Update, January 29, 2025

    The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) has released a new assessment of the ongoing Russian offensive campaign, along with an updated map to provide a visual representation of the current situation on the ground.

    According to the latest report from ISW, Russian forces continue to make significant gains in their offensive campaign, with key advances being made in several strategic locations. The assessment highlights the continued use of airpower and artillery by Russian forces, which have been instrumental in their successes thus far.

    The updated map provided by ISW shows the current front lines and key areas of conflict, giving an overview of the evolving situation in real-time. It also highlights areas where intense fighting is taking place and where Russian forces are consolidating their positions.

    ISW’s analysis also points to the ongoing humanitarian crisis in the region, with reports of civilian casualties and displacement increasing as the conflict escalates. The report underscores the need for a swift resolution to the conflict to prevent further suffering and instability in the region.

    As the situation continues to unfold, ISW will be closely monitoring developments on the ground and providing regular updates to keep the international community informed. Stay tuned for more updates on the Russian offensive campaign as the situation continues to evolve.

    Tags:

    ISW Russian Offensive, Russian Campaign Assessment, Map Update, January 29 2025, ISW assessment, Russian military campaign, Russia offensive update, military map analysis, Russian military strategy, Ukraine conflict update, ISW report on Russian offensive

    #ISW #Russian #Offensive #Campaign #Assessment #Map #Update #January

  • DRA2 Developmental Reading Assessment Grades K-3 Set of 22 Benchmark Readers



    DRA2 Developmental Reading Assessment Grades K-3 Set of 22 Benchmark Readers

    Price : 32.99

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    Are you looking for a comprehensive set of benchmark readers to assess your students’ reading levels in grades K-3? Look no further than the DRA2 Developmental Reading Assessment Grades K-3 Set of 22 Benchmark Readers!

    This set includes a variety of fiction and nonfiction texts at different levels of complexity, allowing you to accurately gauge your students’ reading abilities and track their progress over time. The DRA2 benchmark readers are specifically designed to align with the Developmental Reading Assessment, providing you with a reliable and standardized tool for measuring reading proficiency.

    With the DRA2 Developmental Reading Assessment Grades K-3 Set of 22 Benchmark Readers, you can confidently assess your students’ reading skills and tailor instruction to meet their individual needs. Don’t miss out on this essential resource for early literacy assessment and instruction!
    #DRA2 #Developmental #Reading #Assessment #Grades #Set #Benchmark #Readers,ages 3+

  • Matronix Near Vision Drum – Precision Near Visual Acuity Assessment Tool for Optometry & Ophthalmology


    Price: $74.95
    (as of Jan 17,2025 17:36:46 UTC – Details)



    Introducing our Eye Testing Drum for Near Vision, designed to cater to a diverse clientele with five languages: “Number,” “Hindi,” “English,” “Urdu,” “Symbols,” and “Punjabi.” Fostered with immense years of industry experience, we are engaged in providing a wide range of near vision testing drums.
    Our vendors manufacture this drum with the help of advanced technology, using high-quality raw materials in compliance with the set industry standards. This ensures durability, accuracy, and reliability in vision testing.
    Key Features:

    • Available in five languages: Number, Hindi, English, Urdu, Symbols, and Punjabi
    • Manufactured with advanced technology for precise near visual acuity assessment
    • High-quality raw materials ensure compliance with industry standards
    • Durable and reliable, perfect for optometry and ophthalmology clinics
    • Available in various sizes to meet the diverse needs of clients

    This near vision testing drum is a versatile tool, ideal for both clinical settings and remote eye camps. Enhance your practice with our precision-engineered, multilingual eye testing drum, designed for accurate and comprehensive near vision assessments.
    Date First Available ‏ : ‎ November 4, 2024
    ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CJFS1LM3

    Convenient Wall Hanging Design: Features a wall hanging hole for easy installation, making it a perfect near vision testing tool for optometry and ophthalmology clinics.
    Ideal for On-the-Go Optometrists: Lightweight and portable, this near vision drum is best for camp settings, allowing you to carry and hang it effortlessly for remote visual acuity assessments.
    Precision Near Visual Acuity Assessment: Designed for accurate near vision testing, the Matronix Near Vision Drum ensures reliable results, enhancing patient care in both clinical and field environments.
    Durable and User-Friendly: Built with high-quality materials, this vision testing tool is durable and easy to handle, ensuring longevity and consistent performance in various settings.
    Versatile and Practical Optometry Tool: Whether in a busy clinic or a remote camp, this ophthalmology tool is essential for conducting thorough and precise near vision assessments, promoting better eye health management.


    Introducing the Matronix Near Vision Drum – Precision Near Visual Acuity Assessment Tool for Optometry & Ophthalmology

    Are you looking for a reliable and accurate tool to assess near visual acuity in your optometry or ophthalmology practice? Look no further than the Matronix Near Vision Drum. This innovative device is designed to provide precise measurements of near vision acuity, making it an essential tool for any eye care professional.

    The Matronix Near Vision Drum features a high-quality drum with precise markings that allow for easy and accurate assessment of near visual acuity. The device is portable and easy to use, making it ideal for use in a variety of clinical settings.

    With the Matronix Near Vision Drum, you can quickly and accurately assess near visual acuity in patients of all ages. Whether you are performing routine eye exams or evaluating patients with vision problems, this tool will help you provide the best possible care.

    Don’t settle for subpar tools when it comes to assessing near visual acuity. Invest in the Matronix Near Vision Drum and ensure that you have the most accurate and reliable assessment tool available. Your patients will thank you for it!
    #Matronix #Vision #Drum #Precision #Visual #Acuity #Assessment #Tool #Optometry #Ophthalmology,vision
    accessibility tools

Chat Icon