Tag: Backlash

  • CNN Could Face Backlash Over Potential Move of Jim Acosta


    Depending on who you ask, CNN anchor Jim Acosta is getting a chance to speak to a much broader audience with an assignment at a new and non-traditional time slot, or he’s being removed entirely from the usual daily discussion around the news.

    Executives at CNN have asked Acosta to take a new role, anchoring a show that would air from midnight to 2 a.m. on the eastern coast of the U.S., according to two people familiar with the matter. Even so, the show has been pitched a chance to deliver live breaking news to audiences on the West coast and overseas at times when viewers in those regions are still active and craving information.

    The offer was issued this week, according to these people, and Acosta, who gained a broader profile at CNN with his coverage of the White House during the first administration of President Donald Trump, may not have other options. The understanding is that Wolf Blitzer will soon pick up two hours in late morning alongside Pamela Brown, according to a person familiar with the matter, while Kasie Hunt, who leads an early morning program, is in discussions about taking a role in the evening slot where Blitzer once held sway.

    Acosta has anchored the 10 a.m. hour on CNN for the past 11 months after working a weekend shift. He had been said to have entertained potential offers from rivals at around that time.

    CNN declined to comment on potential personnel moves. The Status newsletter previously reported on Acosta’s potential new assignment.

    CNN, which is grappling with significant downturns in viewership, has long been mulling a set of maneuvers that will put more of a spotlight on digital content, and staffers have grown more anxious over what those ideas will portend. Layoffs have long been expected, according to two people familiar with the situation, along with new tweaks to the schedule of the company’s flagship cable network. There is also a belief among employees that CNN could move more of its production staff to its facilities in Atlanta, which would help it cut down on salaries and real estate in New York and Washington, D.C.

    There are some staffers at CNN who are likely to view a move of Acosta from mid-mornings to overnights as a demotion. After all, CNN typically runs repeats of its primetime shows in the wee hours of the morning to get those programs in front of viewers in California and elsewhere. Indeed, as part of CNN’s proposal, Acosta would potentially move to Los Angeles to take up his new duties, according to the people familiar with the discussions. Staffers have viewed such offers with increasing wariness in recent months after anchors Victor Blackwell and Phil Mattingly each moved to New York to take up new assignments, only to lose them within a short time as the Warner Bros. Discovery-backed outlet continues to grapple with notable declines in its linear audience.

    The timing of the offer has also sparked early backlash within CNN’s hallways, according to one of the people familiar with the talks. Acosta jousted regularly with the Trump administration during his time as a White House correspondent. He found himself temporarily blocked from the White House press room during the Trump administration in November of 2019 because the Commander-in-Chief often didn’t like the questions Acosta asked him at various events. Acosta later became a symbol of America’s belief in the First Amendment when CNN prevailed and got its employee reinstated.

    At a time when more corporations and media organizations seem eager to court Trump’s favor, moving Acosta to a previously unfilled shift might be viewed as a sort of kowtow. CNN has made moves in recent months to court conservative viewers, giving increasing amounts of time to former George W. Bush adviser Scott Jennings and enlisting former Fox News personalities such as Gretchen Carlson and Geraldo Rivera — as well as current contributor Juan Williams, currently promoting a book — to appear on “News Night,” a 10 p.m. roundtable program that features hot talk between people with clashing political beliefs.

    Acosta’s name has come up in the past as a potential candidate for the chopping block. Under previous CEO Chris Licht, CNN parted ways with a handful of employees who were viewed as emblematic of the crusading demeanor backed by Jeff Zucker, who ran the network for about 10 years starting in 2013. Don Lemon, John Harwood and Brian Stelter all exited CNN during Licht’s tenure, though Stelter returned in 2024.

    There may be more in store for the network’s employees. CNN CEO Mark Thompson recently told staffers that corporate parent Warner Bros. Discovery planned to invest $70 million in his strategic vision to augment digital content. There are expectations that CNN will examine launching new properties tied to health, wellness and other topics in which executives hope consumers will have interest. “We will develop new digital products with a special focus on digital experiences worth paying for,” the executive told staffers in a memo in July.



    CNN Could Face Backlash Over Potential Move of Jim Acosta

    CNN is facing potential backlash over reports that they may move Chief White House Correspondent Jim Acosta to a different role within the network. Acosta has been a prominent figure in the network’s coverage of the Trump administration and has often clashed with President Trump during press conferences.

    Many viewers have come to know Acosta for his tough questioning of the administration and his willingness to stand up to the President. Moving him to a different role could be seen as a way to silence his voice and limit his impact on the network’s coverage.

    Some critics argue that CNN should support Acosta and allow him to continue his important work as a journalist, while others believe that his confrontational style may not be the best approach for the network’s overall credibility.

    Regardless of the outcome, CNN will have to carefully navigate this potential move and consider the implications it may have on their viewership and reputation. Only time will tell how this decision will impact the network and its relationship with its audience.

    Tags:

    1. CNN
    2. Jim Acosta
    3. Backlash
    4. Potential Move
    5. News
    6. Media
    7. Press Freedom
    8. White House
    9. Journalism
    10. Controversy

    #CNN #Face #Backlash #Potential #Move #Jim #Acosta

  • Elon Musk’s ex-partner Grimes reveals her India connection amid backlash on Sriram Krishnan’s appointment

    Elon Musk’s ex-partner Grimes reveals her India connection amid backlash on Sriram Krishnan’s appointment


    Elon Musk’s ex-partner and Canadian singer Grimes has revealed her India connection and opened up against the anti-India sentiments amid a backlash over the appointment of Indian-American Sriram Krishnan as a senior policy advisor for Artificial Intelligence by President-elect Donald Trump.

    Grimes took to social media X and revealed that her step-father was an Indian and she grew up in a half-Indian household.

    “Suddenly concocting anti Indian energy out of nowhere is embarrassing y’all. Also, they were clear they planned to do this. My step dad’s Indian, I had a fire childhood in a half Indian household. Indian culture jives very well with western culture,” Grimes posted on X, lending support to the appointment of Sriran Krishnan.

    When asked by a user if India would be okay with being flooded by American culture so much that it changes their significantly, Grimes said it was already done to India. “It has caused a ton of problems for them,” she said. Also Read | ’Y’: Elon Musk, Grimes welcomed 2nd baby through surrogacy in Dec 2021

    “No us companies just flooded them w phones/ weird controlled internet access like thru facebook only. The inverse proposal actually benefits us and prob hurts them re: brain drain Canada has this issue w the us. They take our top talent to the detriment of the country,” Grimes said in another post on the thread.

    In another reply to a user, she said, “It’s good to remember negative comments feel louder and more numerous. If you haven’t much been subjected to social media toxicity it’s good to remember ur monkey brain is telling you ur gonna get kicked out of the tribe and die of starvation or rape – important to fight the monkey brain impulses that social media seeks to trigger.”

    Sriram Krishnan’s appointment as AI advisor in Donald Trump’s cabinet has stirred reactions, bringing outsourcing and immigration concerns to the forefront amid fears of foreigners taking over American jobs.



    Grimes, Canadian singer and former partner of Elon Musk, recently revealed her connection to India amidst the backlash surrounding Sriram Krishnan’s appointment at Twitter.

    In a recent interview, Grimes shared that she has a deep connection to India through her mother, who is of Bengali descent. She expressed her love for the country’s rich culture and vibrant music scene, and spoke about her desire to explore her roots further in the future.

    The revelation comes at a time when Sriram Krishnan, an Indian-American tech executive, faced criticism for his appointment as Twitter’s new head of consumer product. Some users raised concerns about Krishnan’s ties to the Indian government and his previous work at companies with controversial policies.

    Grimes’ statement serves as a reminder of the diversity and complexity of backgrounds within the tech industry, and highlights the importance of embracing different perspectives and experiences. It also sheds light on the need for transparency and accountability in tech leadership, especially when it comes to addressing concerns about potential conflicts of interest.

    As the debate around Sriram Krishnan’s appointment continues, Grimes’ India connection offers a new lens through which to view the issue, emphasizing the importance of understanding and respecting individuals’ cultural backgrounds and personal histories.

    Tags:

    Elon Musk, Grimes, India connection, Sriram Krishnan, backlash, relationship, Tesla, SpaceX, tech industry, controversy, cultural ties, partnership

    #Elon #Musks #expartner #Grimes #reveals #India #connection #backlash #Sriram #Krishnans #appointment

  • Dallas Love Field moving rideshare area closer after passengers’ backlash

    Dallas Love Field moving rideshare area closer after passengers’ backlash


    Dallas Love Field travelers won’t have to journey as far to catch an Uber or Lyft at the airport starting Friday.

    Airport officials say they’re moving the rideshare pickup area closer to the terminal, which is expected to cut the walk from baggage claim roughly in half. The move, first announced in the fall, comes after the airport received backlash from travelers when rideshare pickup was relocated from the curb outside of baggage claim to one of the parking garages in September 2023, forcing passengers to walk about 10 minutes to meet their drivers.

    Rideshare pick-ups will now be next to the valet pavilion on the terminal’s southeast side. Taxis, limos and other on-demand pickups will be nearby in Level 1 of Garage C. Passengers with disabilities will still be able to be picked up curbside at the terminal’s lower level.

    A little more than a year ago, officials at the city-owned airport announced plans to move rideshare and other pick-ups further from the terminal to decrease curbside congestion. But plans to revise that move were announced in October after Love Field passenger complaints and officials admitting to using old metrics to estimate the amount of space and demand needed for the pickups.

    Aviation News

    Stay prepared. Receive the latest airlines news, delivered straight to your inbox.

    “During this time, feedback has continuously indicated extreme dissatisfaction despite valiant customer service efforts and way-finding resources implemented by (Dallas’ Department of Aviation),” assistant city manager Dev Rastogi told the Dallas City Council in an Oct. 4 memo. She said the relocation to Garage B was based on demand capacity analysis done before the 2020 pandemic.

    Airport officials say the new pickup spot has retrofitted curbs, new road striping, more signs and other improvements hoped to improve people’s experience.



    Dallas Love Field Airport has announced that it will be moving its rideshare pickup area closer to the terminal following backlash from passengers.

    The current rideshare pickup location, which is located at the far end of the airport parking garage, has been a source of frustration for travelers who have to walk long distances with their luggage to reach their ride.

    Starting next month, the rideshare pickup area will be relocated to a more convenient spot closer to the terminal. This move is in response to feedback from passengers who have voiced their concerns about the current setup.

    Airport officials have stated that the new location will offer easier access for passengers and will help improve the overall customer experience at Love Field.

    Passengers can expect to see signage and directions to the new rideshare pickup area in the coming weeks. The airport is also working on implementing other improvements to make the rideshare experience more efficient and user-friendly.

    Overall, this change is a positive step towards addressing passenger concerns and making Dallas Love Field a more passenger-friendly airport.

    Tags:

    1. Dallas Love Field rideshare area
    2. Love Field airport rideshare update
    3. Dallas rideshare relocation news
    4. Love Field passenger feedback
    5. Dallas airport transportation changes
    6. Love Field rideshare controversy
    7. Dallas Love Field passenger complaints
    8. Love Field rideshare pickup location
    9. Dallas airport transportation improvements
    10. Love Field rideshare area relocation

    #Dallas #Love #Field #moving #rideshare #area #closer #passengers #backlash

  • “Club 520” Podcast Faces Backlash After Airing Charleston White’s Inappropriate Comments About Angel Reese [Video]

    “Club 520” Podcast Faces Backlash After Airing Charleston White’s Inappropriate Comments About Angel Reese [Video]


    Following Charleston White’s inappropriate comments about WNBA star Angel Reese on the “Club 520” podcast, the show has received major backlash.

    Video

    The situation unfolded during a recent episode when White suggested that Reese “do OnlyFans” and “dunk in some panties.” At one point he stated, “I think Angel Reese wanna sell p***y.”

    Hosts DJ Wells, Jeff Teague, and Bishop B Henn tried to deter White’s comments but also laughed along while he made the sexist remarks. The situation left fans shocked and resulted in a wave of criticism from basketball supporters. NBA and WNBA writer Nekias Duncan urged the podcast team to show respect for WNBA players.

    “Just don’t talk about the W if you can’t even pretend to respect the people involved,” Duncan said.

    Women’s sports expert, Arielle Chambers, also chimed into the conversation and shared her opinion on the matter.

    “I wonder what possesses men to get on their respective podcasts and talk so derogatorily about women/women athletes. The audacity is so alarming. Like you good bruh?! Cuz what?!?!,” she wrote.

    Media personality Natalie Esquire directed her shots at Teague for allowing the derogatory comments to be made on his platform.

    “Jeff Teague is a whole clown for this. I hope no player in the W goes on his pod or works with him. League better not even entertain his a**,” Esquire wrote.

    Ironically, Teague’s podcast situation comes just months after Shaquille O’Neal made similar offensive comments. During an episode of Reese’s “Unapologetically Angel” podcast, O’Neal gave his views on how the WNBA could grow its audience by changing the way the players dress, which left Reese visibly surprised.


    Discover more from Baller Alert

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.





    Club 520 Podcast Faces Backlash After Airing Charleston White’s Inappropriate Comments About Angel Reese [Video]

    The latest episode of Club 520 Podcast has sparked controversy and outrage after guest Charleston White made inappropriate comments about basketball player Angel Reese.

    During the episode, White made derogatory remarks about Reese’s appearance and questioned her talent on the court. The comments were not only offensive but also unprofessional and disrespectful towards a young athlete who has worked hard to excel in her sport.

    The backlash against Club 520 Podcast has been swift and severe, with many calling for the show to issue a public apology and remove the episode from all platforms. Fans of Reese have also taken to social media to express their support for the player and condemn White’s comments.

    In response to the backlash, Club 520 Podcast has issued a statement denouncing White’s remarks and apologizing for any harm caused. The show has also removed the episode from its archives and announced that they will be implementing stricter guidelines for guest appearances in the future.

    The incident serves as a reminder of the importance of responsible and ethical journalism, as well as the need for all media outlets to uphold standards of professionalism and respect. It also highlights the power of social media in holding individuals and organizations accountable for their words and actions.

    Watch the video below to see Charleston White’s inappropriate comments about Angel Reese and join the conversation on social media using the hashtag #JusticeForAngelReese. Let’s stand together in support of athletes like Reese and demand better from those in the media who seek to tear them down.

    Tags:

    Club 520, Podcast, Backlash, Charleston White, Angel Reese, Inappropriate Comments, Video, Controversy, Social Media, Public Outcry, Cancel Culture

    #Club #Podcast #Faces #Backlash #Airing #Charleston #Whites #Inappropriate #Comments #Angel #Reese #Video

  • Squid Game 2 Actor Song Young-Chang Faces Backlash For Past Child Prostitution Charges

    Squid Game 2 Actor Song Young-Chang Faces Backlash For Past Child Prostitution Charges


    Following the unprecedented global success of Squid Game’s first season, the highly anticipated second season has finally arrived on screens. While viewers and critics are sharing mixed reactions to the new installment, one casting choice has sparked significant controversy among audiences.

    The inclusion of actor Song Young Chang in the cast has drawn particular attention, largely due to his controversial past. The actor faced serious legal troubles in September 2000 when he was arrested on charges related to inappropriate conduct with a minor. According to reports, he was accused of having sexual relations with a 16-year-old on two occasions in his vehicle near a park in Goyang.

    The case gained notable attention partly due to its unusual circumstances. Unlike typical cases that result from undercover police operations, this incident came to light because the minor recognized Song from his acting work. This recognition played a crucial role in the subsequent legal proceedings.

    The incident had severe professional consequences for Song. Following these events, he was permanently barred from appearing on major South Korean broadcasting networks, including KBS, EBS, and MBC. This effectively limited his mainstream television appearances, leading him to focus primarily on stage performances in musical theater.

    The revelation of his casting in such a high-profile production has sparked intense discussion across Korean online communities. Many viewers have expressed shock and disappointment at the production team’s decision to include an actor with such a controversial background in the series.

    The backlash highlights ongoing debates about accountability, redemption, and the entertainment industry’s responsibility when making casting decisions.

    The post Squid Game 2 Actor Song Young-Chang Faces Backlash For Past Child Prostitution Charges appeared first on Where Is The Buzz | Breaking News, Entertainment, Exclusive Interviews & More.



    Recently, actor Song Young-Chang, who played one of the prominent roles in the hit Netflix series Squid Game 2, has faced backlash after reports resurfaced about his past involvement in child prostitution charges.

    The actor, who gained fame for his portrayal of a ruthless villain in the popular show, has been accused of engaging in illegal activities involving minors in the past. These allegations have sparked outrage among fans and critics alike, with many calling for his removal from the show and a boycott of his work.

    While Song Young-Chang has not yet responded to the backlash, the controversy surrounding his past actions has raised questions about the entertainment industry’s responsibility to hold its members accountable for their past transgressions. As the debate continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how this scandal will impact the actor’s career and the future of Squid Game 2.

    Tags:

    Squid Game 2, Song Young-Chang, actor, backlash, child prostitution charges, controversy, past allegations, Korean drama, Netflix series, scandal, social media backlash

    #Squid #Game #Actor #Song #YoungChang #Faces #Backlash #Child #Prostitution #Charges

  • David Ayer Responds to Backlash Against His Support of James Gunn’s Superman Amid Suicide Squad ‘Ayer Cut’ Campaign

    David Ayer Responds to Backlash Against His Support of James Gunn’s Superman Amid Suicide Squad ‘Ayer Cut’ Campaign


    Suicide Squad 2016 director David Ayer has responded to an online backlash against his support for James Gunn’s Superman and its recently released debut trailer.

    Ayer, whose widely panned Suicide Squad movie formed a part of the now defunct DCEU, had initially taken to X/Twitter to ask fans not to launch the latest ‘Ayer Cut’ campaign at the same time as Thursday’s Superman trailer release date.

    “I didn’t realize James was dropping Creature Commandos when the last Ayer cut campaign hit,” Ayer tweeted. “The new Superman trailer is dropping soon and I know there’s intentions of another campaign for my version of Skwad.

    “As a film makers [sic] I want to support other film makers. I’m excited to see the trailer and have heard through the rumor mill it’s pretty incredible.

    “I just want to publicly say it would be nice to stay far clear of Thursday for any campaigning.

    “I appreciate everyone hearing me out. At the end of the day I’m riding a tiger here. Just going in heard [sic] on this. ”

    Some of the reaction to this tweet, particularly from supporters of the Ayer Cut campaign, went overboard, rekindling memories of the infamous Zack Snyder fandom that played a part in the 2021 release of the Snyder Cut of Justice League. Ayer, clearly exacerbated by what he’d witnessed on social media last week, announced he was taking a “step back” from the discourse.

    “My Lord,” he tweeted. “If supporting another film maker is so contentious, I’m just lost at this point.

    “When I was a kid I had a nightmare childhood. My best friends were comic books. They held me and gave me company when no one else did.

    “Batman spoke to my injured soul. Superman’s optimism was an example how to see the world without darkness.

    “I cannot f***ing wait to see Jame’s [sic] trailer. Real talk. And I cannot wait to see his film. And absolutely am sure he crushed it. Because that simple optimism of Superman is all over it. And the little kid in me needs that right now.

    “I’m a bad guy for that? So be it.

    “I do troll what I can control. And can’t what I can’t. Gonna step back from all this for a moment.”

    null
    David Ayer has given up on the director’s cut of Suicide Squad. Photo by Gareth Cattermole/Getty Images.

    While the ‘release the Snyder Cut’ online campaign did end up contributing to Warner Bros.’ decision to make it a reality, Ayer said in January that he had officially given up on his campaign to have his director’s cut of Suicide Squad similarly released.

    Cries for the Ayer Cut began after the extended Snyder Cut of Justice League was released in 2021. This version was generally considered to be an improvement upon the much-maligned original, and Ayer had long maintained that “his version” of Suicide Squad would have the same result. He’d also remained positive about the eventual Ayer Cut release, even with James Gunn and Peter Safran ditching the DCEU for a fresh start.

    Wesley is the UK News Editor for IGN. Find him on Twitter at @wyp100. You can reach Wesley at wesley_yinpoole@ign.com or confidentially at wyp100@proton.me.



    Recently, director David Ayer has found himself in the midst of controversy over his public support of James Gunn’s upcoming Superman film, amid the ongoing campaign for the release of his own cut of “Suicide Squad.”

    After Gunn’s involvement in the DC Extended Universe was announced, Ayer took to social media to express his excitement for the project, praising Gunn’s talent and expressing his belief that the filmmaker would do justice to the iconic character of Superman.

    However, Ayer’s comments were met with backlash from fans who have been pushing for the release of the “Ayer Cut” of “Suicide Squad,” a version of the film that reportedly differs significantly from the theatrical release.

    In response to the criticism, Ayer took to Twitter to address the situation, stating that he fully supports Gunn and his vision for Superman, while also acknowledging the disappointment felt by fans who are still hoping to see his original vision for “Suicide Squad” come to light.

    Ayer’s comments have sparked a debate among fans, with some applauding his humility and support for Gunn, while others continue to express their frustration over the lack of acknowledgment for the “Ayer Cut.”

    As the discussion continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether Ayer’s statements will help to quell the backlash or if the campaign for the release of the “Ayer Cut” will only grow stronger in response.

    Tags:

    1. David Ayer
    2. James Gunn
    3. Superman
    4. Suicide Squad
    5. Ayer Cut
    6. Backlash
    7. Campaign
    8. Director
    9. Support
    10. Response

    #David #Ayer #Responds #Backlash #Support #James #Gunns #Superman #Suicide #Squad #Ayer #Cut #Campaign

  • Musk and Ramaswamy defend foreign worker visas, sparking MAGA backlash

    Musk and Ramaswamy defend foreign worker visas, sparking MAGA backlash




    CNN
     — 

    Social media posts by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy arguing in favor of expanding the visa program for highly skilled workers have set off a debate among supporters of President-elect Donald Trump over how the program should fit into the incoming administration’s aggressive immigration agenda.

    Musk and Ramaswamy, whom Trump has tapped to lead his Department of Government Efficiency, defended companies who use workers on H-1B visas, arguing tech companies — including those owned by Musk — depend on foreign workers to operate. But their message rankled some of Trump’s most loyal defenders who expect his administration to crack down on immigration and promote American labor.

    Trump restricted access to foreign worker visas during his first term and has targeted the H-1B program in past remarks. But during the 2024 campaign, Trump signaled openness to giving some foreign-born workers legal status if they graduated from a US university.

    In a social media post on Wednesday, Musk said US tech companies need “double” the amount of engineers working in America today and compared the benefits of the program to a professional sports team recruiting the best talent from around the world.

    “If you want your TEAM to win the championship, you need to recruit top talent wherever they may be. That enables the whole TEAM to win,” Musk wrote on X.

    “I am referring to bringing in via legal immigration the top ~0.1% of engineering talent as being essential for America to keep winning,” Musk wrote in another post on Thursday. “Thinking of America as a pro sports team that has been winning for a long time and wants to keep winning is the right mental construct.”

    Ramaswamy, a first-generation US citizen whose parents immigrated from India, concurred with Musk while defending companies that look outside the US for labor, arguing tech companies hire engineers who were born outside the US or born to American immigrants because “American culture has venerated mediocrity over excellence,” citing portrayals of smart students in TV sitcoms “Boy Meets World,” “Saved By The Bell” and “Family Matters” as evidence.

    “Our American culture has venerated mediocrity over excellence for way too long (at least since the 90s and likely longer). That doesn’t start in college, it starts YOUNG,” he wrote on Thursday. “A culture that celebrates the prom queen over the math olympiad champ, or the jock over the valedictorian, will not produce the best engineers.”

    The support for foreign workers sparked attacks from MAGA supporters who are concerned that an expansion of the H-1B program could undermine their wish to see immigration curbed under Trump’s administration. Loyal Trump backers like far-right activist Laura Loomer, conservative pundit Ann Coulter and former Rep. Matt Gaetz have criticized the two tech entrepreneurs over their stance.

    “We welcomed the tech bros when they came running our way to avoid the 3rd grade teacher picking their kid’s gender – and the obvious Biden/Harris economic decline,” Gaetz wrote in a social media post on Thursday. “We did not ask them to engineer an immigration policy.”

    Musk and Ramaswamy’s comments also drew condemnation from former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley, who responded to Ramaswamy’s post by calling on the incoming administration to prioritize American workers over foreign workers.

    “There is nothing wrong with American workers or American culture. All you have to do is look at the border and see how many want what we have. We should be investing and prioritizing in Americans, not foreign workers,” Haley wrote on Thursday.

    Musk and Ramaswamy’s position has found support among some Democrats as well.

    “They get it partially right, absolutely,” Colorado Gov. Jared Polis told CNN’s Kaitlan Collins on “The Source” Thursday night, saying that he applauded their recognition of the value of immigrant entrepreneurs while hoping that they also see the role that lower-skilled immigrants have in other sectors of the American economy, such as agriculture and construction.

    “There are millions of Americans that work for companies that were founded by immigrants. Those jobs wouldn’t exist today if we didn’t let those immigrants in,” Polis said.

    The H-1B visa program allows 65,000 highly skilled workers to immigrate to the US each year to fill a specific job and grants another 20,000 visas to such workers who have received an advanced degree in the US. Economists have argued the program allows US companies to maintain competitiveness and grow their business, creating more jobs in the US. The program is often associated with the tech sector, where companies have a high demand for specialized workers. Musk came to the US as a foreign student and later worked on an H1-B visa.

    Trump has previously opposed H-1B visas, sharply criticizing them during his first presidential campaign as a vehicle for “abuse.” In a 2016 statement, Trump attacked the H-1B program as a method for US companies to bring foreign workers into the country “for the explicit purpose of substituting for American workers at lower pay.”

    In 2020, Trump restricted access to H-1B visas on several occasions, part of the administration’s effort to curb legal immigration while responding to the changing economic conditions brought on by the Covid-19 pandemic.

    But in his most recent presidential campaign, Trump has appeared more tolerant of highly skilled foreigners coming to work in the US. In a podcast interview in June, Trump said he wants to grant permanent residency to any foreign national who graduates college in the US.

    “What I want to do, and what I will do is – you graduate from a college, I think you should get automatically, as part of your diploma, a green card to be able to stay in this country,” Trump said on the “All In” podcast.

    Musk’s clash with members of Trump’s base over the visa issue marks another chapter in the tech billionaire’s growing influence in the president-elect’s orbit. After Musk led the opposition to a bipartisan government funding bill that was ultimately scrapped once Trump came out against it, Democrats began derisively labeling the tech mogul “President Musk” to suggest Musk his dictating policy goals to Trump. During remarks at a conservative activist gathering in Arizona on Sunday, Trump pushed back on the attacks from Democrats.

    “No, he’s not taking the presidency. I like having smart people,” he said. “They’re on a new kick. ‘Russia, Russia, Russia,’ ‘Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine,’ all the different hoaxes. The new one is ‘President Trump has ceded the presidency to Elon Musk.’ No, no, that’s not happening.”



    Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy are facing backlash from the “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) community after publicly defending foreign worker visas. Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, and Ramaswamy, a prominent biotech entrepreneur, recently spoke out in support of H-1B visas, which allow skilled foreign workers to come to the United States for employment.

    In a series of tweets, Musk argued that H-1B visas are essential for attracting top talent to American companies and fostering innovation. He emphasized the importance of a diverse workforce in driving technological advancements and economic growth.

    Ramaswamy echoed Musk’s sentiments, stating that H-1B visas play a crucial role in filling gaps in the labor market and fueling entrepreneurship. He emphasized the need for a more flexible and inclusive immigration system to support the U.S. economy.

    However, their statements have sparked a backlash from supporters of former President Donald Trump and the MAGA movement, who view H-1B visas as a threat to American jobs and workers. Critics have accused Musk and Ramaswamy of prioritizing profits over the interests of American workers and undermining efforts to prioritize domestic employment.

    The debate over foreign worker visas continues to be a contentious issue in the United States, with advocates on both sides of the argument. As Musk and Ramaswamy defend their stance, it remains to be seen how the MAGA backlash will impact their public image and business endeavors.

    Tags:

    1. Elon Musk
    2. Ramaswamy
    3. Foreign worker visas
    4. MAGA backlash
    5. Immigration policy
    6. Tech industry
    7. H-1B visas
    8. Silicon Valley
    9. Immigration reform
    10. Donald Trump

    #Musk #Ramaswamy #defend #foreign #worker #visas #sparking #MAGA #backlash

  • Age of Revolutions: Progress and Backlash from 1600 to the Present

    Age of Revolutions: Progress and Backlash from 1600 to the Present


    Price: $29.99 – $12.50
    (as of Dec 24,2024 02:25:53 UTC – Details)


    From the Publisher

    A fascinating look at history . Walter Isaacson

    A fascinating look at history . Walter Isaacson

    An earnest plea for a return to third-way political centrism. Booklist

    An earnest plea for a return to third-way political centrism. Booklist

    Publisher ‏ : ‎ W. W. Norton & Company (March 26, 2024)
    Language ‏ : ‎ English
    Hardcover ‏ : ‎ 400 pages
    ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0393239233
    ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0393239232
    Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 2.31 pounds
    Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6.3 x 1.4 x 9.3 inches

    Customers say

    Customers find the book insightful and well-researched. They describe it as a great, helpful read with an easy writing style. Readers praise the author as pleasant and knowledgeable. The narrative is described as timely and quickly told. However, opinions differ on the accuracy of the history, with some finding it cohesive and well-tied together, while others feel it lacks depth regarding current times.

    AI-generated from the text of customer reviews


    The Age of Revolutions: Progress and Backlash from 1600 to the Present

    Revolutionary movements have shaped the course of history for centuries, sparking both progress and backlash in societies across the globe. From the political upheavals of the 17th and 18th centuries to the social and cultural revolutions of the 20th and 21st centuries, the Age of Revolutions has been marked by moments of great change and turmoil.

    The seeds of revolution were planted in the early modern period, with events such as the English Civil War and the American Revolution challenging established power structures and paving the way for new forms of governance. The French Revolution of 1789 further ignited a wave of revolutionary fervor, inspiring movements for democracy and equality around the world.

    In the 19th century, industrialization and imperialism fueled social and economic unrest, leading to revolutions in places like Russia, China, and Latin America. These movements aimed to overthrow oppressive regimes and create more equitable societies, but often faced violent repression and political backlash.

    The 20th century saw the rise of nationalist and socialist revolutions, as well as movements for civil rights, women’s rights, and LGBTQ rights. While these struggles brought about significant social and political change, they also faced resistance from conservative forces seeking to maintain the status quo.

    Today, we continue to witness the ongoing struggle between progress and backlash in the Age of Revolutions. From the Arab Spring to the Black Lives Matter movement, people around the world are rising up against injustice and oppression, demanding a more just and equitable society.

    As we reflect on the history of revolutionary movements from 1600 to the present, we are reminded of the power of collective action and the importance of standing up for our rights and freedoms. The Age of Revolutions may be marked by conflict and turmoil, but it is also a time of great hope and possibility for a more just and equitable world.
    #Age #Revolutions #Progress #Backlash #Present

Chat Icon