Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: ballot
Pa. elections chief touts progress in reducing mail ballot rejection rate
Lehigh County voter registration workers sort mail-in ballots Nov. 5, 2024, at Lehigh County Government Center in Allentown, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania. (Matt Smith / For Spotlight PA)Matt Smith
HARRISBURG — County elections officials in Pennsylvania rejected more than 11,000 mail-in ballots for technical reasons in the November election, including thousands that were determined to violate the much litigated requirement that voters provide accurate, handwritten dates on the return envelopes.
Data from the Department of State released this week shows about 2,600 were turned down for having the wrong date and nearly 2,100 for having no date at all.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court said in mid-January it will rule on whether the envelope date requirement violates a state constitutional mandate that elections be free and equal, the latest development in a string of court cases since mail-in voting was widely expanded under a 2019 law.
The elections agency also said about 3,000 votes didn’t count because the voters failed to put their ballot into a secrecy envelope and more than 3,500 were thrown out for lacking a signature. In addition, nearly 7,000 mail-in ballots that counties rejected in November had arrived to be counted after the cut-off time of 8 p.m. on Election Day, when polls closed.
The county workers who run the nuts and bolts of Pennsylvania elections do not use the outer envelope date for any practical purpose — they time stamp ballots when they arrive and know when they were sent out. Republicans who have advocated for the dates consider them an added layer of security.
The 11,000-plus votes rejected for wrong dates, no dates, no signatures or no security envelopes is a jump from the comparable figure in the November 2023 election, when about 8,000 votes were rejected for at least one of those four categories. However, 2024 was a high-turnout presidential election with a contested U.S. Senate race, while 2023 had less voter participation and only statewide judicial contests at the top of the ballot.
“Every vote is precious — a single vote being rejected is intolerable,” Secretary of State Al Schmidt said Friday. “So that’s why we have done all that we can to minimize the opportunity for voters to make mistakes.”
The Department of State redesigned mail-in ballot envelopes twice last year and engaged in a voter education effort, aiming to reduce the rejection rate. The percentage of returned mail ballots that were rejected fell from about 2.4% in the April primary to about 1% in November, the agency announced.
“We wanted to minimize opportunities for voters to make mistakes, whether they’re elderly or whether they’re filling this out when they’re sending their kids off to school in the morning,” Schmidt said.
There has been progress but there is more that counties can do to further reduce the rate of rejected mail ballots, said ACLU of Pennsylvania lawyer Vic Walczak.
“It’s 11,000 too many, so it’s better than the rejection rate before that,” said Walczak, who is involved in the pending state Supreme Court case. “It’s welcome and should be celebrated, but we shouldn’t be declaring victory yet.”
Some 2 million Pennsylvanians cast votes by mail this fall, and about 88% of the mail ballots that were sent out were returned by voters.
“Voter education isn’t something you do once, it’s something you always have to do,” Schmidt said. “And any ballot that is rejected — a single ballot in Pennsylvania that’s been rejected — feels like a failure to anyone who really cares about democracy.”
Pennsylvania’s top elections official, Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, is touting the state’s progress in reducing the rejection rate of mail-in ballots. In a recent statement, Boockvar highlighted the improvements made to the mail ballot process, which have led to a significant decrease in the number of rejected ballots.According to Boockvar, the rejection rate for mail-in ballots dropped from 1.5% in the 2020 election to just 0.2% in the 2021 primary election. This improvement is attributed to a number of factors, including enhanced voter education efforts, improved ballot design, and increased communication with voters about potential issues with their ballots.
Boockvar emphasized the importance of ensuring that every eligible voter’s ballot is counted, and praised the efforts of election officials and volunteers in achieving this goal. She also encouraged voters to familiarize themselves with the mail ballot process and to carefully follow all instructions to ensure their vote is counted.
Overall, the progress made in reducing the rejection rate of mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania is a positive development that reflects the state’s commitment to fair and accessible elections. As the state continues to refine its mail ballot procedures, voters can have confidence that their voices will be heard in future elections.
Tags:
- Pennsylvania elections
- Mail ballot rejection
- Voting progress
- Election chief updates
- Ballot rejection rate
- Pennsylvania voting
- Mail-in ballots
- Election updates
- Voting improvements
- Pennsylvania election chief
#elections #chief #touts #progress #reducing #mail #ballot #rejection #rate
Pennsylvania elections chief touts progress in reducing mail ballot rejection rate | Wire
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — County elections officials in Pennsylvania rejected more than 11,000 mail-in ballots for technical reasons in the November election, including thousands that were determined to violate the much litigated requirement that voters provide accurate, handwritten dates on the return envelopes.
Data from the Department of State released this week shows about 2,600 were turned down for having the wrong date and nearly 2,100 for having no date at all.
kAm%96 !6??DJ=G2?:2 $FAC6>6 r@FCE D2:5 😕 >:5\y2?F2CJ :E H:== CF=6 @? H96E96C E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^A6??DJ=G2?:2\>2:=\32==@ED\52E6D\6?G6=@A6D\a6_`35cga6h4dg3a4g56ege476c33h62Qm6?G6=@A6 52E6k^2m C6BF:C6>6?E G:@=2E6D 2 DE2E6 4@?DE:EFE:@?2= >2?52E6 E92E 6=64E:@?D 36 7C66 2?5 6BF2=[ E96 =2E6DE 56G6=@A>6?E 😕 2 DEC:?8 @7 4@FCE 42D6D D:?46 >2:=\:? G@E:?8 H2D H:56=J 6IA2?565 F?56C 2 a_`h =2H]k^Am
kAm%96 6=64E:@?D 286?4J 2=D@ D2:5 23@FE b[___ G@E6D 5:5?VE 4@F?E 3642FD6 E96 G@E6CD 72:=65 E@ AFE E96:C 32==@E :?E@ 2 D64C64J 6?G6=@A6 2?5 >@C6 E92? b[d__ H6C6 E9C@H? @FE 7@C =24<:?8 2 D:8?2EFC6] x? 255:E:@?[ ?62C=J f[___ >2:=\:? 32==@ED E92E 4@F?E:6D C6;64E65 😕 }@G6>36C 925 2CC:G65 E@ 36 4@F?E65 27E6C E96 4FE\@77 E:>6 @7 g A]>] @? t=64E:@? s2J[ H96? A@==D 4=@D65]k^Am
kAm%96 4@F?EJ H@C<6CD H9@ CF? E96 ?FED 2?5 3@=ED @7 !6??DJ=G2?:2 6=64E:@?D 5@ ?@E FD6 E96 @FE6C 6?G6=@A6 52E6 7@C 2?J AC24E:42= AFCA@D6 — E96J E:>6 DE2>A 32==@ED H96? E96J 2CC:G6 2?5 <?@H H96? E96J H6C6 D6?E @FE] #6AF3=:42?D H9@ 92G6 25G@42E65 7@C E96 52E6D 4@?D:56C E96> 2? 25565 =2J6C @7 D64FC:EJ]k^Am
kAm%96 “[___\A=FD G@E6D C6;64E65 7@C HC@?8 52E6D[ ?@ 52E6D[ ?@ D:8?2EFC6D @C ?@ D64FC:EJ 6?G6=@A6D 😀 2 ;F>A 7C@> E96 4@>A2C23=6 7:8FC6 😕 E96 }@G6>36C a_ab 6=64E:@?[ H96? 23@FE g[___ G@E6D H6C6 C6;64E65 7@C 2E =62DE @?6 @7 E9@D6 7@FC 42E68@C:6D] w@H6G6C[ a_ac H2D 2 9:89\EFC?@FE AC6D:56?E:2= 6=64E:@? H:E9 2 4@?E6DE65 &]$] $6?2E6 C246[ H9:=6 a_ab 925 =6DD G@E6C A2CE:4:A2E:@? 2?5 @?=J DE2E6H:56 ;F5:4:2= 4@?E6DED 2E E96 E@A @7 E96 32==@E]k^Am
kAm“tG6CJ G@E6 😀 AC64:@FD — 2 D:?8=6 G@E6 36:?8 C6;64E65 😀 :?E@=6C23=6[” $64C6E2CJ @7 $E2E6 p= $49>:5E D2:5 uC:52J] “$@ E92E’D H9J H6 92G6 5@?6 2== E92E H6 42? E@ >:?:>:K6 E96 @AA@CEF?:EJ 7@C G@E6CD E@ >2<6 >:DE2<6D]”k^Am
kAm%96 s6A2CE>6?E @7 $E2E6 C656D:8?65 >2:=\:? 32==@E 6?G6=@A6D EH:46 =2DE J62C 2?5 6?82865 😕 2 G@E6C 65F42E:@? 677@CE[ 2:>:?8 E@ C65F46 E96 C6;64E:@? C2E6] %96 A6C46?E286 @7 C6EFC?65 >2:= 32==@ED E92E H6C6 C6;64E65 76== 7C@> 23@FE a]cT 😕 E96 pAC:= AC:>2CJ E@ 23@FE `T 😕 }@G6>36C[ E96 286?4J 2??@F?465]k^Am
kAm“(6 H2?E65 E@ >:?:>:K6 @AA@CEF?:E:6D 7@C G@E6CD E@ >2<6 >:DE2<6D[ H96E96C E96JVC6 6=56C=J @C H96E96C E96J’C6 7:==:?8 E9:D @FE H96? E96J’C6 D6?5:?8 E96:C <:5D @77 E@ D49@@= 😕 E96 >@C?:?8[” $49>:5E D2:5]k^Am
kAm%96C6 92D 366? AC@8C6DD 3FE E96C6 😀 >@C6 E92E 4@F?E:6D 42? 5@ E@ 7FCE96C C65F46 E96 C2E6 @7 C6;64E65 >2:= 32==@ED[ D2:5 pr{& @7 !6??DJ=G2?:2 =2HJ6C ‘:4 (2=4K2<]k^Am
kAm“xE’D “[___ E@@ >2?J[ D@ :E’D 36EE6C E92? E96 C6;64E:@? C2E6 367@C6 E92E[” D2:5 (2=4K2<[ H9@ 😀 :?G@=G65 😕 E96 A6?5:?8 DE2E6 $FAC6>6 r@FCE 42D6] “xE’D H6=4@>6 2?5 D9@F=5 36 46=63C2E65[ 3FE H6 D9@F=5?’E 36 564=2C:?8 G:4E@CJ J6E]”k^Am
kAm$@>6 a >:==:@? !6??DJ=G2?:2?D 42DE G@E6D 3J >2:= E9:D 72==[ 2?5 23@FE ggT @7 E96 >2:= 32==@ED E92E H6C6 D6?E @FE H6C6 C6EFC?65 3J G@E6CD]k^Am
kAm“’@E6C 65F42E:@? :D?’E D@>6E9:?8 J@F 5@ @?46[ :E’D D@>6E9:?8 J@F 2=H2JD 92G6 E@ 5@[” $49>:5E D2:5] “p?5 2?J 32==@E E92E 😀 C6;64E65 — 2 D:?8=6 32==@E 😕 !6??DJ=G2?:2 E92E’D 366? C6;64E65 — 766=D =:<6 2 72:=FC6 E@ 2?J@?6 H9@ C62==J 42C6D 23@FE 56>@4C24J]”k^Am
k9C ^m
kAmpDD@4:2E65 !C6DD C6A@CE6C |2J2 $H665=6C 😕 (2D9:?8E@?[ s]r][ 4@?EC:3FE65]k^Am
Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Pennsylvania elections chief, Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, has recently announced significant progress in reducing the mail ballot rejection rate in the state. In a press conference held earlier this week, Boockvar highlighted the efforts made by the state to address issues that have historically led to high rejection rates for mail-in ballots.According to Boockvar, Pennsylvania has implemented new procedures and guidelines to ensure that mail-in ballots are properly completed and submitted in accordance with state laws. These measures include providing voters with clear instructions on how to fill out their ballots, as well as implementing enhanced verification processes to confirm voter identities.
As a result of these efforts, Boockvar reported that the rejection rate for mail-in ballots in the recent primary election was significantly lower than in previous elections. This improvement is a promising sign for the upcoming general election, as mail-in voting is expected to play a crucial role in ensuring that all eligible voters can safely participate in the democratic process.
Boockvar emphasized that the state will continue to work towards further reducing the mail ballot rejection rate and ensuring that every vote is counted. She also encouraged voters to familiarize themselves with the guidelines for mail-in voting to help prevent any issues that could lead to their ballot being rejected.
Overall, Pennsylvania’s progress in reducing the mail ballot rejection rate is a positive development that underscores the state’s commitment to upholding the integrity of its elections. With the general election rapidly approaching, voters can feel confident that their mail-in ballots will be processed efficiently and accurately.
Tags:
Pennsylvania elections, mail ballot rejection rate, voting progress, election chief, Pennsylvania voting, mail-in ballots, election updates, voting improvements, ballot acceptance, Pennsylvania politics
#Pennsylvania #elections #chief #touts #progress #reducing #mail #ballot #rejection #rate #WireNBA All-Star ballot – Picks for 24 spots and every position battle
The NBA is set to announce the 14 All-Star reserves tonight. And while the game itself has a new format — All-Stars will be split up into three teams, with Friday night’s Rising Stars champion becoming the fourth entry to the three-game mini-tournament — the debate about who should be headed to San Francisco isn’t going away.
To settle that debate, let’s break down our 24 selections, including new picks for the 10 starters announced last week.
Should Kevin Durant and LeBron James be starters — or on the team at all? Will perennial stars Devin Booker and Damian Lillard make the cut? And where does Victor Wembanyama land?
To make our choices, we followed the same rubric that the NBA does — two guards and three frontcourt players for the starters and two guards, three frontcourt players and two wild cards for the reserves. No shoehorning players into positions for which they aren’t eligible. Rules are rules, after all. (As a reminder: If you say, “Player X is an All-Star!” you have to say which player they would replace.)
Our star-studded field is filled with snubs and agonizing decisions and is ripe for debate. Let’s get to the picks.
Starters
G: Jalen Brunson, New York Knicks
G: Donovan Mitchell, Cleveland Cavaliers
F: Giannis Antetokounmpo, Milwaukee Bucks
F: Jayson Tatum, Boston Celtics
F: Karl-Anthony Towns, New York KnicksReserves
G: Darius Garland, Cleveland Cavaliers
G: Cade Cunningham, Detroit Pistons
F: Evan Mobley, Cleveland Cavaliers
F: Jaylen Brown, Boston Celtics
F: Pascal Siakam, Indiana Pacers
WC: Damian Lillard, Milwaukee Bucks
WC: Tyler Herro, Miami Heat
Why the East presents roster battles everywhere
Three East starting spots are locks. Antetokounmpo and Tatum should be consensus choices, and both should appear on the vast majority of ballots in ESPN’s second MVP straw poll of the season next month. Ditto for Brunson, the driver of everything Tom Thibodeau’s club does. That leaves the second guard and third frontcourt spots. And the debate, not surprisingly, includes three Cavaliers: Garland and Mitchell for the guard spot, and Mobley alongside Towns for the frontcourt spot.
Let’s start with guard and the debate between Garland and Mitchell. By stats, Garland has a very strong case. Cleveland has an absurd 125 offensive rating when Garland is on the court this season, and he’s having a more efficient season than Mitchell across the board while also generating more assists.
Ultimately, this is about a bit more than numbers. Spend any time around the East-best Cavaliers and you’ll see Mitchell is the player everyone takes their cues from. That is why, ultimately, he gets the second backcourt spot alongside Brunson. Garland slots into our first reserve spot.
Towns against Mobley for the final frontcourt spot is also an interesting debate. Towns has had a fantastic season as the other half of New York’s offensive engine and taking on massive minutes — many out of position as the Knicks await the return of the injured center Mitchell Robinson.
Towns sits at 25.1 points and 13.9 rebounds per game with incredibly efficient shooting numbers (54.5% overall and 43.4% from 3). His defense, while improved, remains a weakness.
Mobley, meanwhile, is one of the most impactful defensive players in the league and is taking significant strides offensively this year (increases in points, 3-point attempts and percentage, free throw attempts and percentage) while also having impressive advanced metrics buttressing his case.
In the end, the spot went to Towns because he has to carry a heavier burden for the Knicks than Mobley does for the Cavaliers. That doesn’t diminish Mobley’s impact one bit, as his ascension this season has not only played a massive role in Cleveland’s rise, it gives the franchise hope of a sustained run in the league’s upper echelon.
Both are deserving choices. But for now, Mitchell and Garland are the Cavs’ offensive focal points, and Mobley has another excellent defensive big next to him in Allen. The Knicks, on the other hand, are almost 11 points per 100 possessions worse with Towns off the court, and their offense craters without him.
The fourth guard spot was also a relatively simple choice, with Cunningham getting the nod. Between Detroit’s rise into playoff contention and his putting up massive numbers as the driver of the team’s offense (24.5 points, 6.5 rebounds, 9.3 assists on 45/37/81 splits), this is as much recognition of the Pistons as it is Cunningham’s achievements, but he has more than earned this spot.
The East frontcourt was filled with difficult decisions. (I don’t particularly understand why the NBA uses a format of two guards, three frontcourt players and two wild cards to fill out the reserves. If it was up to me, I would simply say to pick the seven most deserving players who weren’t voted in as starters.)
For example, I considered several guards for the final two wild-card spots, and there were no frontcourt players who made it under consideration. This team easily could’ve had seven or eight guards on it, but instead, there had to be a couple of extra frontcourt players who aren’t quite as deserving.
Both Paolo Banchero and Franz Wagner would have been clear options at different points this season, but oblique injuries have knocked both out of contention. Before the season, Joel Embiid and Paul George would have been expected to be in the running for a spot on this team, and neither is within a hundred miles of it. Bam Adebayo‘s numbers have taken a significant dip, leaving him nowhere near consideration for a spot, either. (Jimmy Butler, too, for a multitude of reasons.) Another All-Star last year, Scottie Barnes, also doesn’t have a strong case. Josh Hart would get a spot if he was a frontcourt option.
So, with Mobley locked into the first frontcourt reserve spot, and those seven players off the board, it would be great to have the plethora of guards as options. Instead, the choice came down to the following guys: Brown, Siakam and Jarrett Allen (OG Anunoby and Jalen Johnson have had nice seasons but didn’t make my cut).
Brown has been part of Boston’s confusing malaise in recent weeks (8-6 since Jan. 1). However, he has taken on the challenge every night of guarding the best perimeter offensive threat, and he carries a significant burden alongside Tatum as the two offensive engines of one of the NBA’s best teams, so he gets one of the spots basically by default.
That leaves a very interesting choice between Siakam, who has been the most consistent force on the resurgent Pacers this season, and Allen, who has been a key cog on the NBA’s most surprising team.
Allen is durable (he has played every game this season) and productive (14 points, 10 boards, 70% shooting), and Cleveland has an argument for getting four players in. Siakam has also played every game this season, scoring over 20 points on 52% shooting with a career-best 41% from deep for an Indiana team that is 9-2 in 2025.
I went back and forth but ultimately settled on Siakam for essentially the same reason I went with Towns over Mobley: default to the player who carries the greater burden on a nightly basis. That has clearly been Siakam.
Seven players for two spots? Wild-card chaos among reserves
Now we get to the two East wild cards, where several guards — LaMelo Ball, Tyrese Haliburton, Tyler Herro, Zach LaVine, Damian Lillard, Tyrese Maxey and Trae Young — all have cases to be considered for final roster spots.
Maxey was the first to be eliminated. Yes, he’s averaging a career-high 26.4 points, but as his usage has expanded for the injury-riddled Sixers, his shooting percentages have plummeted. (Even the most die-hard 76ers fans wouldn’t argue this team deserves a representative in San Francisco.)
A lot of the all-in-one numbers would argue Haliburton deserves one of these two spots, and he has certainly come on after an extremely rough start, but his overall résumé falls a bit short of his competitors here, making him the next one to go.
Ball has one of the more interesting All-Star candidacies in recent memory. His numbers are eye-popping: He’s averaging 29 points and 7.5 assists and has a staggering usage rate of 35.7% (including a league-leading 24 shots per game and 12 3-point attempts per night), the highest of any qualified player this season. But the rebuilding Hornets are nowhere near a playoff berth, and Ball having the ball in his hands so much of the time is, by nature, boosting his stats. A similar narrative follows NBA assists leader Young, who is helming a young Hawks team into a potential playoff spot, but he also falls a bit short of making my final cut.
LaVine’s and Herro’s numbers, across the board, are virtually identical. Both are averaging 24 points, and Herro has slightly higher assist numbers while LaVine has been the more efficient scorer. Chicago’s offense is a staggering 12 points per 100 worse when LaVine is on the bench, while Miami’s is 10 points worse when Herro sits.
Two weeks ago, I might have chosen LaVine. But given Chicago’s fall over that span — including losses to the Pelicans, Hornets, Trail Blazers, 76ers and shorthanded Hawks, among others — the nod for one spot goes to Herro, Miami’s one consistent perimeter shot creator during the ongoing Butler saga.
That leaves Lillard for the final spot. He isn’t quite the dominant backcourt force he once was, but he’s still averaging 25 and 7 while shooting close to 40% from 3 on high volume. He and Antetokounmpo are regularly the only reliable scoring threats for Milwaukee.
Western Conference picks
Starters
G: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Oklahoma City Thunder
G: Stephen Curry, Golden State Warriors
FC: Nikola Jokic, Denver Nuggets
FC: Victor Wembanyama, San Antonio Spurs
FC: Jaren Jackson Jr., Memphis GrizzliesReserves
G: Kyrie Irving, Dallas Mavericks
G: Anthony Edwards, Minnesota Timberwolves
FC: Jalen Williams, Oklahoma City Thunder
FC: Anthony Davis, Los Angeles Lakers
FC: Domantas Sabonis, Sacramento Kings
WC: Kevin Durant, Phoenix Suns
WC: LeBron James, Los Angeles Lakers
A starting lineup shuffle, plus major frontcourt competition
Jokic and Gilgeous-Alexander will go down to the wire in the MVP race and are automatic choices here. Curry is, too, once Luka Doncic was knocked off the ballot because of a calf injury. (Doncic’s injury knocked him off the ballot entirely, easing an already complicated decision for the back end of the roster.)
While James and Durant were lined up alongside Jokic in the league’s official starting lineup unveiled last week, Wembanyama and Jackson have better cases.
Wembanyama’s rocket ship to stardom has been as obvious as it has been expected. But while the numbers are eye-popping — 24 points, 10 rebounds and a league-leading 3.9 blocks per game with improving scoring efficiency on all three levels — what truly stands out is that San Antonio is 13.9 points per 100 possessions better when Wembanyama is on the court this season.
Jackson is having a wildly underrated season in Memphis. For a Grizzlies team that has exceeded expectations despite Ja Morant already missing 19 games, Jackson has played in 45 of Memphis’ 47 games this season. Jackson has built on his developmental time last year as the fulcrum of the Grizzlies’ offense amid many injuries to post a career high in points per game (22.8) while playing almost three minutes fewer per night than he did last year.
With Doncic’s injury knocking him out of the picture, Irving and Edwards were easy choices as the reserve guards. Irving has been efficient, durable and available for Dallas, while Edwards has shown massive increases in his 3-point attempt rate and volume en route to posting a career-high 26.3 points per game.
Some might be surprised to see Williams get the first frontcourt reserve spot, but he has had an impressive season in OKC as the team’s secondary shot creator and distributor behind Gilgeous-Alexander. Williams is in the league’s top 15 in estimated plus-minus, continues to take on significant defensive assignments and is a big part of why this team has continued racking up wins while Chet Holmgren, Isaiah Hartenstein and Alex Caruso have all missed significant time with injuries.
While Davis will not be the Defensive Player of the Year, Lakers coach J.J. Redick has followed through on his preseason pledge to make Davis the focal point of the Lakers’ offense. The big man has delivered. He has been an impact player at both ends of the court and is producing at a higher rate on increased volume, more than he has during any of his six seasons in Los Angeles.
Sabonis might be considered a questionable pick as the third and final frontcourt selection, but he shouldn’t be. Sacramento’s offense is a full 10 points worse per 100 possessions with him on the bench, and his numbers across the board — 21 points, a league-leading 14.6 rebounds, 6.5 assists, 60.9% shooting and 48.1% from 3 — are eye-popping.
Why LeBron and KD aren’t starting — and who they narrowly beat out
Now, the fun part: We are 10 players in, and still haven’t found spots for Durant or James.
James, in particular, has had a confusing season. He remains an excellent individual offensive player — he’s averaging nearly 24 points per game on over 50% shooting, hitting nearly 40% from 3 and getting 9 assists per game. But the Lakers are a significantly worse defensive team with him on the court: 8.6 points per 100 possessions across the whole season, and even 6 points per 100 possessions over the past several weeks since James took a two-game, mid-December break to recharge.
Durant is having another metronomically efficient season: 27.1 points per game shooting over 50% for a 14th consecutive season. Those numbers have come with his worst plus-minus since his first two seasons in the league as the Suns fight to stay in the play-in mix.
But is there anyone who should overtake either legend? The most notable name missing so far is Durant’s teammate, Devin Booker, who obviously is one of the 12 best players in the Western Conference on pure talent. But Booker’s first two months were far below his usual standard from an efficiency standpoint, and even after some recent improvements he is still shooting his lowest percentage since his third season in the league.
After consistently pushing Phoenix to elite offenses whenever he was on the court in the past, he hasn’t this year. The Suns have an offensive rating of 114.3 when he’s on the court, his lowest since 2018-19 when Phoenix finished 19-63.
The most glaring omission from this team is any representation from the second-place Houston Rockets. Amen Thompson would be on this team if the résumés were contained to just this month’s play, though center Alperen Sengun has the best argument over the course of the season. Houston’s offense is seven points per 100 possessions better with him on the court, but his stats lag a bit behind Sabonis and aren’t strong enough to lift him over James or Durant.
James Harden and Norman Powell have both had underrated seasons for the LA Clippers, one of the biggest surprises in the league. Powell, in particular, is having a career year at 31 years old, with LA’s offense over 11 points per 100 better with him on the court. And Powell’s scoring average has jumped a full 10 points (23.9 from 13.9) year-over-year.
Ultimately, no one could quite make the case to unseat James or Durant for the final two spots. They aren’t starting for this team like they are in next month’s game(s), but the two future Hall of Famers still very much belong.
As the NBA All-Star game approaches, basketball fans around the world eagerly await the announcement of the official All-Star ballot. With only 24 spots available, the competition for a spot on the roster is fierce. Let’s take a look at some of the top contenders for each position battle:Eastern Conference:
1. Point Guard: Kyrie Irving, Kemba Walker, Ben Simmons
2. Shooting Guard: Bradley Beal, Zach LaVine, Jaylen Brown
3. Small Forward: Kevin Durant, Jayson Tatum, Jimmy Butler
4. Power Forward: Giannis Antetokounmpo, Julius Randle, Domantas Sabonis
5. Center: Joel Embiid, Nikola Vucevic, Bam AdebayoWestern Conference:
1. Point Guard: Stephen Curry, Damian Lillard, Chris Paul
2. Shooting Guard: Luka Doncic, Devin Booker, Donovan Mitchell
3. Small Forward: LeBron James, Kawhi Leonard, Paul George
4. Power Forward: Anthony Davis, Zion Williamson, Draymond Green
5. Center: Nikola Jokic, Rudy Gobert, Karl-Anthony TownsWith so many talented players vying for a spot on the All-Star roster, the competition is sure to be intense. Who will make the final cut? Stay tuned for the official announcement and get ready to see the best of the best face off in the NBA All-Star game.
Tags:
NBA All-Star ballot, NBA All-Star picks, NBA All-Star 24 spots, NBA All-Star position battle, NBA All-Star selection, NBA All-Star starters, NBA All-Star reserves, NBA All-Star voting, NBA All-Star predictions, NBA All-Star snubs, NBA All-Star roster, NBA All-Star game, NBA All-Star weekend, NBA All-Star starters 2022, NBA All-Star reserves 2022, NBA All-Star lineup, NBA All-Star starters by position, NBA All-Star reserves by position, NBA All-Star starters and reserves.
#NBA #AllStar #ballot #Picks #spots #position #battleCalifornia ballot measure would result in
A “Calexit” initiative to allow California to secede from the United States has been cleared to legally gather signatures.
If passed, the proposed measure — “Calexit,” a nod to the Brexit vote in the UK — would be on the ballot in 2028 and ask voters: “Should California leave the United States and become a free and independent country?”
A new ballot measure would explore California leaving the United States. REUTERS For the measure to pass, at least 50% of registered voters must participate in the election, and at least 55% — or more than 500,000 people, must vote “yes” by July 22.
Should that happen, it would trigger “a vote of no confidence in the United States of America” and “expression of the will of the people of California” to become an independent country.
Then a 20-member commission would be created to study the viability of California operating as an independent state in 2027 and to publish a report the following year.
The measure would not actually cause California to secede. AP Then the question would appear on the ballot in 2028.
And if that’s approved, the proposal would declare a “vote of no confidence in the United States of America” — without changing the state’s government or its relationship with the U.S.
The measure also calls for the U.S. flag to be removed from all state buildings.
The secession plan was introduced by Marcus Evans, a Fresno-based political activist, according to the California Secretary of State. Evans unsuccessfully pushed the state to secede in President Trump’s first term in office.
“We believe that now is the best time to Calexit – NOW we are better situated to make Calexit happen than in 2016,” he told CBS News.
The scheme will cost the state at least $10 million, and $2 million a year to operate the commission, according to CBS.
“California Ballot Measure Would Result in Major Changes to State’s Education System”
Tags:
- California ballot measure
- California voting rights
- Voting laws in California
- California election news
- California ballot initiatives
- Voting rights in California
- California politics
- California voting reform
- California ballot measure update
- California voting rights act
#California #ballot #measure #result
Donald Trump Supporters Are Waking Up To The Reality Of Their Ballot Choices After Trump Launched His Own Meme Coin, And The Reactions Are A Loooooot
President Trump and first lady Melania Trump are going viral for launching their own cryptocurrency meme-coins, and it’s causing some MAGA supporters to regret their votes after the Trump coin reportedly plunged 20% in value in 24 hours.
Meanwhile, Melania’s coin reportedly dropped in value by over 50% in 24 hours.
Trump has advocated for making the US the “crypto capital of the planet,” but MAGA supporters are not in agreement. Here’s what they’re saying over on the r/LeopardsAteMyFace subreddit:
1.“Seriously I was a big trump fan, but which president thinks it’s a good idea to make a meme coin when they are about to be in charge of a very large country?”
2.“Honestly, this is worrying behavior to have the fucking president of the United States do this. Imagine what we would be saying if Democrats did this.”
3.“Anyone else’s money disappear after buying $TRUMP coin on Robinhood?”
4.“I was reckless and lost 7 thousand in Trump’s currency”
5.“I just lost $1000 since last hour,” one commenter wrote. “Don’t know if things will go up from here man. Kinda depressed here. Not sure if his speech will change anything tomorrow,” another replied.
6.“I was a massive supporter of Trump, but now I look stupid.”
7.“Give us JD Vance fuck this”
8.“Please please please Mr. President. Don’t get involved with crypto.”
9.“I don’t understand why the office of the presidency needs to be running pump and dump crypto schemes. It all seems like a very strange thing to do.”
10.“What I’m most concerned about is that this is not what I voted for — meme coins, Greenland threats, Internet trolling, and whatever else he’s been doing.”
11.“I know I’m probably gonna get downvoted to oblivion, but Trump and his team after finally winning, they have just been screwing up left and right. First Elon and Vivek on the H1B situation, then Elon musk throwing temper tantrums at people on twitter, Trump saying he is gonna keep tiktok despite him wanting to ban it before and saying it was a national security risk, now this crypto coin? Am I the only one seeing this?”
12.“If you don’t care about a president making billions off of a meme coin that’s going to get rug pulled…your card to complain when Democrats pull scams…is here by revoked.”
13.And finally, “What a clown show. Fuck Trump.”
What are your thoughts on Trump’s meme coin? Let us know in the comments below.
As Donald Trump continues to make waves in the cryptocurrency world with the launch of his own meme coin, TrumpCoin, his supporters are starting to wake up to the reality of their ballot choices. The reactions are a looooot.Many Trump supporters who invested in TrumpCoin thinking it would be a savvy financial move are now questioning their decision as the coin’s value has plummeted. Some are even calling it a scam and expressing regret for putting their trust in the former president.
Others, however, are doubling down on their support for Trump and his foray into the world of cryptocurrency. They see TrumpCoin as a way to show their loyalty and devotion to the former president, and are willing to ride out the ups and downs of the market in order to see their investment pay off.
Overall, the launch of TrumpCoin has sparked a heated debate among Trump supporters, with some feeling disillusioned and others feeling more committed than ever. It seems that no matter what happens with TrumpCoin, one thing is for sure: the reactions are a looooot.
Tags:
- Donald Trump supporters
- Trump meme coin
- Trump ballot choices
- Trump supporters reactions
- Trump meme coin reactions
- Trump supporters awakening
- Trump meme coin news
- Trump supporters reality check
- Trump meme coin launch
- Trump supporters meme coin reaction
#Donald #Trump #Supporters #Waking #Reality #Ballot #Choices #Trump #Launched #Meme #Coin #Reactions #Loooooot
Cole Hamels, Ryan Braun headline 2026 Hall of Fame ballot newcomers
Leading up to Tuesday’s announcement of the Baseball Hall of Fame’s 2025 class, the question wasn’t whether or not Ichiro Suzuki would be elected on his first ballot, but rather if he could be the second unanimous selection. (He was not, coming just one vote shy, with 99.7 percent of the vote.) There will be no such intrigue a year from now.
GO DEEPER
Ichiro, Sabathia and Wagner elected to Baseball Hall of Fame
Left-hander Cole Hamels and outfielder Ryan Braun headline the class eligible for the Hall of Fame for the first time next year.
Hamels (59) and Ryan Braun (47.1) have the highest bWAR among the newcomers, while six players have a career bWAR between 30 and 40.
The lack of a marquee name is good news for this year’s holdovers, freeing up space on ballots limited to 10 selections.
To be eligible for the Hall of Fame ballot, players must be at least five seasons removed from their final MLB game and have played at least 10 years in the majors. It takes 75 percent of the votes to be selected and 5 percent of the vote to stay on the ballot. Candidates can stay on the ballot for up to 10 years.
The 2025 ballot had 14 new candidates and 14 holdovers. Of the 14 newcomers, two were elected and just two more — Félix Hernández and Dustin Pedroia — received the five percent required to appear on the 2026 ballot. Of the 14 holdovers from 2024, Wagner was elected and the other 13 received at least 5 percent to remain on the ballot.
Baseball Hall of Fame 2025 voting
Player Votes Percent Ichiro Suzuki
393
99.7
CC Sabathia
342
86.8
Billy Wagner
325
82.5
Carlos Beltrán
277
70.3
Andruw Jones
261
66.2
Chase Utley
157
39.8
Alex Rodríguez
146
37.1
Manny Ramírez
135
34.3
Andy Pettitte
110
27.9
Félix Hernández
81
20.6
Bobby Abreu
77
19.5
Jimmy Rollins
71
18
Omar Vizquel
70
17.8
Dustin Pedroia
47
11.9
Mark Buehrle
45
11.4
Francisco Rodríguez
40
10.2
David Wright
32
8.1
Torii Hunter
20
5.1
Ian Kinsler
10
2.5
Russell Martin
9
2.3
Brian McCann
7
1.8
Troy Tulowitzki
4
1
Curtis Granderson
3
0.8
Adam Jones
3
0.8
Carlos González
2
0.5
Hanley Ramírez
0
0
Fernando Rodney
0
0
Ben Zobrist
0
0
The BBWAA’s screening committee will make their next selections from a group of now-eligible players and release the ballot in November. Here are the players the committee will have to consider over the next four voting cycles, along with their Baseball-Reference WAR, Jaffe WAR Score system (JAWS) rating and the average JAWS of Hall of Famers at their respective positions.
2026 Hall of Fame ballot newcomers
Player
bWAR
JAWS
Jpos
59
48.2
61.5
47.1
42.9
53.4
34.5
32.8
53.4
34.6
31.9
56.1
35.5
31.5
53.4
35
30.3
57
33.6
29.1
56.1
30.9
28.5
56.1
Others
Gio Gonzalez, Matt Kemp, Jason Kipnis, Daniel Murphy, Rick Porcello, Matt Wieters, Jeff Samardzija, Kelvin Herrera, Edinson VolquezWhile Hamels and Braun are the top new names by bWAR, neither comes within 10 points of reaching their positional standard in JAWS, which helps compare players across generations, using the players’ best seasons as a measuring stick. Braun also has the black mark of violating MLB’s performance-enhancing drugs policy. No player suspended for violating the policy has been elected to the Hall of Fame.
This means a pair of center fielders, Carlos Beltrán and Andruw Jones, have a much better chance at hearing their names called a year from now. Beltrán received 277 votes, 70.3 percent of the 394 votes cast, 19 votes short of the 75 percent necessary for election. Jones received 261 votes (66.2 percent.)
“If you get 43 percent or so, odds are you’re eventually going to get elected, whether by the writers or a committee, and that’s where we find the possibility of Pettitte ending up,” Jaffe said.
With the exceptions of Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Curt Schilling — all of whom fell off the ballot in 2022 — and players currently on the ballot, no player has gotten more than Roger Maris’ 43.1 percent in 1988 and not eventually been elected, either by the BBWAA or one of the Hall of Fame’s committees. Steve Garvey received his highest total, 42.6 percent, in 1995, but remains outside the Hall.
2027 Hall of Fame ballot newcomers
Player
bWAR
JAWS
Jpos
44.8
40.7
44.3
43.5
38.9
61.5
44.3
38.3
53.4
38
36.6
55.4
40.1
35.6
56.7
36.9
34.4
56.2
Others
Ervin Santana, Asdrúbal Cabrera, Josh Reddick, Jake Arrieta, Todd Frazier, Scott Kazmir, Jordan Zimmermann, J.A. Happ, Trevor Bauer, Jay Bruce, Jonathan Lucroy, Dexter Fowler, Joakim Soria, Starlin Castro, Alex Avila, Wilson Ramos, Jon Jay, Wade Davis, Tony Watson, Dellin Betances, Derek Holland, Andrew Miller, Neftalí Féliz, Will Harris, John AxfordPosey, with his three World Series titles, seven All-Star selections, Most Valuable Player award, five Silver Sluggers, a Gold Glove and batting title, is the type of player whose resume outweighs any statistical measure. He is likely the only player with a chance at first-ballot selection in 2027.
2028 Hall of Fame newcomers
Player
bWAR
JAWS
Jpos
101.5
81.6
53.4
68.1
58.7
57
40.2
35.9
61.5
37.2
35.6
55.4
38.5
35.5
44.3
32.3
30.6
53.4
32.3
30.4
61.5
Others
Aníbal Sánchez, Kirk Suzuki, Jed Lowrie, Tyler Clippard, Zack Britton, Dee Strange-Gordon, Chris Archer, Mark Melancon, Greg Holland, Óliver Pérez, Steve Cishek, Joe Smith, Alcides Escobar, Sean Doolittle, Sergio RomoAs with Suzuki, the question won’t be if Pujols gets in, it’s if he’ll be a unanimous selection. It’s hard to find an argument against the slugger, who finished his career with over 100 bWAR.
Pujols’ long-time teammate, catcher Yadier Molina, will likely eventually end up in Cooperstown — and possibly in the first year of eligibility.
Canó has the numbers, but his suspension for violating MLB’s performance-enhancing drugs policy in 2018 makes his path more difficult.
2029 Hall of Fame newcomers
Player
bWAR
JAWS
Jpos
67.1
56
53.4
64.5
55.7
53.4
77.5
62.9
61.5
57.6
50.3
56.2
46.7
44.2
56.2
45.2
40.7
61.5
42.1
36.1
56.1
34
34.4
61.5
37.3
33.8
61.5
34.3
31.2
53.4
34.2
30.4
55.4
Others
Jean Segura, AJ Pollock, Hyun Jin Ryu, Jonathan Schoop, Ian Kennedy, Eric Hosmer, Jackie Bradley Jr., Mike Moustakas, Collin McHugh, Corey Dickerson, Eduardo Escobar, Liam Hendricks, Brad Hand, Jeurys Familia, Alex Colomé, Brad BoxbergerWhile Pujols is the best first baseman of his generation, the top first basemen of the 2010s in each league — Cabrera and Votto — will be on the ballot for the first time in 2029. Both should eventually be elected — Cabrera’s round counting stats (more than 3,000 hits and 500 homers) make him a shoo-in for the first ballot, while Votto’s numbers are more nuanced but no less impressive.
Greinke is the first of the group that includes Clayton Kershaw, Justin Verlander and Max Scherzer, who will be no-doubt first-ballot selections. After those four, starting pitchers enshrined will have completely different-looking resumes. While Adam Wainwright finished with just 200 wins, his career spanned a time when the starter role changed dramatically. His case will likely be lumped with others, like Hernández, for a more philosophical debate about what a Hall of Fame starting pitcher looks like.
(Top photo of Cole Hamels: Hunter Martin / Getty Images)
In 2026, the baseball world will welcome a new group of potential Hall of Famers to the ballot, with former MLB stars Cole Hamels and Ryan Braun leading the way. Both players had standout careers and left their mark on the game, making them strong candidates for induction into Cooperstown.Cole Hamels, a left-handed pitcher, enjoyed a successful 16-year career in the majors, primarily with the Philadelphia Phillies. Hamels was a three-time All-Star, won a World Series MVP in 2008, and finished in the top 10 of Cy Young voting multiple times. Known for his pinpoint control and devastating changeup, Hamels was a reliable and dominant force on the mound throughout his career.
Ryan Braun, an outfielder, spent his entire 14-year career with the Milwaukee Brewers. Braun was a six-time All-Star, won the National League MVP in 2011, and earned multiple Silver Slugger awards. Despite controversy surrounding a PED suspension in 2013, Braun remained a feared hitter and solid defender throughout his career, finishing with over 300 home runs and 200 stolen bases.
Both Hamels and Braun will have their Hall of Fame credentials scrutinized by voters, but their impressive resumes and impact on the game make them strong contenders for induction. As fans and analysts debate their worthiness for Cooperstown, one thing is clear: both players left a lasting legacy on the game of baseball.
Tags:
Cole Hamels, Ryan Braun, 2026 Hall of Fame ballot, newcomers, MLB, baseball, Hall of Fame, future Hall of Famers, player statistics, career achievements, voting process, baseball legends, sports news
#Cole #Hamels #Ryan #Braun #headline #Hall #Fame #ballot #newcomers2025 Baseball Hall of Fame ballot reveal: Everything to know
The Hall of Fame voting results from the Baseball Writers’ Association of America will be announced Tuesday at 6 p.m. ET, with several players hoping to hear their names announced as part of the class of 2025.
This year’s ballot is probably the weakest since the early 2000s — with newcomer Ichiro Suzuki the only slam-dunk candidate — especially compared to the middle of last decade, when an overstuffed ballot led to quality candidates getting knocked off after just a year or two. The nadir came in 2013, when no player was voted in from a ballot that featured 10 players who have since been elected to the Hall of Fame.
What has happened since? For starters, the PED logjam cleared — and the post-steroid era downturn in offense means fewer hitters with big numbers. Starting pitchers who reach the ballot have now spent much of their careers in an era when they pitch fewer innings and thus win fewer games.
All this has led to players like Joe Mauer, Todd Helton and Scott Rolen getting elected in recent years — players the general public might have viewed as borderline, but who were top candidates in their election years. That mindset is important to consider for the 2025 results: Voters will compare players not only to established Hall of Fame standards but also to the other players on the ballot. (Disclosure: I was a first-time voter this year.) That means while Ichiro might be the only surefire candidate, several other players have a chance to get elected.
Here’s what to watch for on Hall of Fame reveal day, remembering the general guidelines:
• A player needs 75% to get elected (not rounded up).
• A player needs 5% to remain on the ballot.
• Writers can vote for a maximum of 10 players.
• A player can remain on the ballot for 10 years.
Will Ichiro become the second unanimous selection?
It’s hard to imagine having a Hall of Fame ballot in your hands and not checking the box next to Ichiro’s name, but Mariano Rivera in 2019 has been the only unanimous selection in history. One voter didn’t vote — or forgot to vote — for Derek Jeter. Three didn’t vote for Ken Griffey Jr. And don’t even ask about some of the percentages for older players like Willie Mays and Henry Aaron.
Ichiro is polling at 100% of the public ballots revealed on the Hall of Fame tracker website. Ichiro’s 60 career WAR doesn’t scream inner-circle Hall of Famer or even a typical first-ballot selection, but he also didn’t debut in the majors until his age-27 season — and still registered over 3,000 career hits. He averaged 5.6 WAR his first three seasons with the Seattle Mariners, which doesn’t even include his best season in 2004, when he set the record for hits in a season. He won 10 Gold Gloves, was the American League MVP winner as a rookie and was one of the most iconic players of all time.
Seven of Ichiro’s peak seasons actually came in Japan. If you also add in those seven seasons, he’s at 100 career WAR — a figure only five position players who started their careers after 1969 have ever reached.
Does CC Sabathia make it on his first ballot?
It looks like it. Sabathia is polling at 93.3%, and while vote percentages revealed after the announcement almost always go down, Sabathia appears to have the cushion needed to get elected. Sabathia finished 251-161 with a 3.74 ERA, 62.3 career WAR, a Cy Young Award and a World Series title with the New York Yankees in 2009. During his five-year peak from 2007 to 2011, he ranked second to Roy Halladay in pitching WAR.
Many voters used to have a first-ballot rule, where they would only vote for a player the first time they appeared on the ballot if they were an inner-circle Hall of Famer, but that has mostly gone away. In recent years, we had Mauer in 2024 (55.2 WAR) and David Ortiz in 2022 (55.3 WAR) make it on the first ballot with less career WAR than Sabathia or Ichiro. It’s also true that Sandy Koufax would be the only starting pitcher with less WAR than Sabathia to make it on his first try — and Koufax, with his early retirement, was a special case. Sabathia is hardly an automatic selection, and while I voted for him, I’m a little surprised that it appears he’ll get in on his first try.
Does Billy Wagner finally make it in?
The reliever with a 2.31 career ERA is on his 10th and final BBWAA ballot. It’s been a slow climb. In his first two years in 2016 and 2017, back in those crowded ballot days, Wagner polled at just 10%. By last year, he was up to 73.8%, falling just five votes short. He’s polling at 84.8% on the public ballots, up from the 78% he was polling before the results a year ago, but that’s only a few extra votes, so it’s going to be close. (I voted for Wagner, so that will help him.)
The non-Wagner supporters point to his 10.03 ERA in the postseason (in just 11 ⅔ innings, however). There is also the reasonable argument that no team would have traded, say, Bobby Abreu or Torii Hunter or Ian Kinsler, to name three players on this year’s ballot, for Wagner. So why should Wagner make the Hall of Fame and not players of that caliber? Again, fair argument, but voters have made the decision to compare Wagner to other relievers, not other players. While voters have been too lenient in selecting relievers, Wagner’s dominance can’t be ignored. He arguably ranks behind only Rivera among modern closers — and Wagner had a 1.43 ERA his final season, so he had plenty left in the tank when he retired.
How close will Andruw Jones and Carlos Beltran get?
The two center fielders continue to see their totals go up and have a chance to get elected this year. Jones, now on his eighth ballot, received 61.6% of the vote last year, and is currently polling at 73.3%. Beltran finished at 57.1% on his second ballot a year ago and is polling at 80.6% this time around. Beltran first appeared on the ballot in the wake of the Houston Astros‘ sign-stealing scandal, and his vote totals certainly suffered as a result of his involvement. With 70.1 career WAR, 435 home runs, 1,587 RBIs and great numbers in the postseason (.307/.412/.609), his case is otherwise strong. He received my vote.
The case for Jones: He was one of the best defensive center fielders of all time (he won 10 Gold Gloves) and hit 434 home runs. That’s a nice combination to sell. He also played for those Atlanta Braves teams when they were winning the division title every season, and that helps as well. Baseball-Reference credits him with 62.7 WAR — just above that 60 career total that generally marks a strong candidate. Jones fizzled out early, however, with his last good season coming when he was 29. Additionally, in the context of his era, his offensive numbers, despite the power, aren’t all that impressive: .254/.337/.486 and a 111 OPS+. Only four Hall of Fame outfielders have a lower career OPS+: Tommy McCarthy (an obscure 19th century player), Lloyd Waner (one of the worst players in the Hall) and speedsters Max Carey and Lou Brock.
I spent more time looking at Jones than any other player before deciding not to vote for him. In the end, I just don’t completely trust the defensive numbers that prop up his WAR. Baseball-Reference credits Jones with plus-235 runs saved on defense (a combination of two different metrics, Total Zone through 2002 and Defensive Runs Saved after that). That’s the most of any outfielder — and the second most of any player, behind only Brooks Robinson.
Willie Mays, as a comparison, is credited with 185 fielding runs (second highest among center fielders) — but Mays also played many more innings. On a per-inning basis, Jones comes out almost twice as good as Mays. Twice as good as Willie Mays?! Sounds skeptical. When digging into the numbers, an interesting thing is that for most of Jones’ career as a center fielder, Braves’ left fielders — first Ryan Klesko and then Chipper Jones for a couple years — had unusually low range factors. It seems likely Jones was taking all the either/or plays away from the left fielders, pushing up his putout totals. Since the Total Zone metric is an estimate, that gives him some eye-popping fielding numbers early in his career.
Jones was a truly generational center fielder, no doubt. But take a few wins off his WAR total and that puts him into the mid-50s, enough to make him fall short of the Hall of Fame to me — not to mention that there are several more worthy center fielders deserving of Hall of Fame status in my book, such as Beltran, Kenny Lofton, Jim Edmonds and perhaps Bernie Williams (the latter three long gone off the ballot).
How will Chase Utley and Jimmy Rollins fare?
The two longtime Philadelphia Phillies teammates have very different cases. Utley had an outstanding peak from 2005 to 2010 when he was one of the best players in the game, second only to Albert Pujols in WAR. Rollins won an MVP Award, was more durable and played longer — but he finished with a career OPS+ of just 95, meaning he was a below-average hitter overall. Utley easily trumps Rollins in WAR, 64.5 to 47.6, and that helps explains why he’s polling much better so far, 53.9% to 18.8%. I voted for Utley, with his peak level of performance carrying the day despite a relatively short career and fewer than 2,000 hits.
Will Andy Pettitte start getting some support? How about Mark Buehrle?
With Sabathia on the ballot and likely getting in, it’s hard to ignore this comparison:
Sabathia: 251-161, 61.8 pitching WAR, 3577 IP, 3.74 ERA, 116 ERA+
Pettitte: 256-153, 60.7 WAR, 3316 IP, 3.85 ERA, 117 ERA+
Buehrle: 214-160, 60.0 WAR, 3283 IP, 3.81 ERA, 117 ERA+I don’t see much difference here between the three. Yes, Sabathia had that five-year stretch where he was one of the top starters in baseball, but his five-year peak (30.4 WAR) isn’t all that higher than Pettitte’s (28.2) or Buehrle’s (27.2). That certainly helps Sabathia’s case and is part of why he’ll get in, but I voted for both Pettitte and Buehrle as well. I just didn’t see how I could vote for Sabathia and not the other two.
Pettitte was on my TV screen every October for almost two decades, a key member of five World Series championship teams; that put him over the top for me, even if he was more of a “compiler” in the Don Sutton/Jim Kaat mode of starting pitcher. In Buehrle’s case, I’m of the belief that each generation needs equal representation, and he was one of the best starting pitchers of his generation. He won fewer games than Sabathia, but that was mostly because he didn’t hang around and extend his career — he won 15 games his final season while Sabathia was 60-59 with a 4.33 ERA over his final seven seasons.
Who stays on the ballot?
Felix Hernandez was a “no” for me, but I’m glad he has already received enough votes to stay on. He won 169 games on terrible Mariners teams that never scored any runs, but while he had an outstanding peak, he was done at 30:
Hernandez through age 30: 154-109, 3.16 ERA, 126 ERA+, 51.2 WAR
Sabathia through age 30: 176-96, 3.51 ERA, 125 ERA+, 49.8 WARSabathia wasn’t hugely valuable after that, but he managed to hang around and win another 75 games. King Felix won just 15 more games. He’ll at least get the chance to have his Hall of Fame case discussed — unlike Johan Santana, who got bumped off the ballot. As pitchers continue to win fewer and fewer games, maybe the standards will change to focus more on peak and less on longevity (which would certainly help Hernandez’s case).
Dustin Pedroia (on his first ballot) and David Wright (on his second) should also get enough votes to remain on, which will keep their careers in the public eye. Pedroia finished with 51.9 WAR and Wright with 49.2. Both likely had Hall of Fame careers shortened by injuries: Pedroia with the knee injury suffered on a Manny Machado hard slide; Wright with a back injury. Pedroia played just nine games after 2017; Wright just 77 after 2014.
Those are the two highest WAR totals among position players who suffered a career-ending injury (as opposed to a debilitating injury or series of injuries) and aren’t in the Hall of Fame. The best comparison might be Kirby Puckett, who suddenly lost his vision due to glaucoma and never played again. He finished with 51.1 WAR and made the Hall of Fame on the first ballot. Pedroia and Wright are in a unique class of almost.
Wondering about Alex Rodriguez and Manny Ramirez? Yes, they’re still on the ballot.
A-Rod is polling around 40% on his fourth ballot and Ramirez at 36% on his ninth. It appears they’re destined to be in the same club as Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Mark McGwire.
The 2025 Baseball Hall of Fame ballot has been revealed, and it features some of the biggest names in the history of the sport. From perennial All-Stars to World Series champions, this year’s ballot is stacked with talent.Some of the notable players on the ballot include Derek Jeter, David Ortiz, and Alex Rodriguez. Jeter, a former New York Yankees shortstop, is a five-time World Series champion and one of the most beloved players in recent memory. Ortiz, a designated hitter for the Boston Red Sox, is a three-time World Series champion and one of the most clutch hitters in postseason history. Rodriguez, a former third baseman for the Seattle Mariners and Texas Rangers, is a three-time American League MVP and one of the most prolific hitters of his era.
In addition to these star players, the 2025 Hall of Fame ballot also includes several other deserving candidates, such as Curt Schilling, Barry Bonds, and Roger Clemens. Schilling, a former pitcher for the Philadelphia Phillies, Arizona Diamondbacks, and Boston Red Sox, is a three-time World Series champion and one of the most dominant postseason pitchers of all time. Bonds and Clemens, both former MVP winners, are two of the most controversial figures in baseball history due to their alleged steroid use.
Voting for the 2025 Baseball Hall of Fame class will take place over the next several weeks, with the results set to be announced in January. Fans and analysts alike will eagerly await the announcement to see which players will join the ranks of baseball’s immortals in Cooperstown.
Stay tuned for more updates on the 2025 Baseball Hall of Fame ballot and the latest news surrounding the world of baseball.
Tags:
baseball hall of fame, 2025, ballot reveal, hall of fame ballot, baseball, 2025 hall of fame, ballot reveal 2025, baseball hall of fame ballot, hall of fame reveal, hall of fame news, baseball news
#Baseball #Hall #Fame #ballot #revealFrequently asked questions 2025 Hall of Fame ballot
The ballots for this year’s Hall of Fame vote have been turned in. The only thing left is for the results to be unveiled.
Here is everything you need to know ahead of Tuesday’s announcement.
Exclusive coverage of the 2025 BBWAA Hall of Fame announcement will begin Tuesday at 4 p.m. ET on MLB Network, leading up to the results being revealed at 6 p.m. Along with MLB Network carrying the announcement, MLB.com, MLB.TV and the MLB App will join the coverage at 6 p.m.
The returnees (listed in order of their 2024 election percentage) are:
Billy Wagner (73.8%), Andruw Jones (61.6%), Carlos Beltrán (57.1%), Alex Rodriguez (34.8%), Manny Ramirez (32.5%), Chase Utley (28.8%), Omar Vizquel (17.7%), Bobby Abreu (14.8%), Jimmy Rollins (14.8%), Andy Pettitte (13.5%), Mark Buehrle (8.3%), Francisco Rodriguez (7.8%), Torii Hunter (7.3%) and David Wright (6.2%).
The first-timers are: Carlos González, Curtis Granderson, Félix Hernández, Adam Jones, Ian Kinsler, Russell Martin, Brian McCann, Dustin Pedroia, Hanley Ramirez, Fernando Rodney, CC Sabathia, Ichiro Suzuki, Troy Tulowitzki and Ben Zobrist.
Who has the best chance at election?
As far as who is most likely to join Suzuki this summer in Cooperstown, Wagner seems to have the best chance among the returning candidates. He came up just short at 73.8% last year — and this is his 10th and final year on the ballot. Beltrán and Jones are also hoping to continue their climbs toward the 75% threshold, though they need to make much bigger jumps than Wagner.
Suzuki could also be joined by another first-timer in Sabathia. The six-time All-Star and 2007 AL Cy Young winner seems to have the second-best chance among players appearing on the ballot for the first time.
Who is the most interesting first-timer?
Hernández’s candidacy is likely the most intriguing among first-time players. He was a six-time All-Star and won the 2010 AL Cy Young Award. He also led the league in ERA twice (2.27 in 2010, and 2.14 in ’14) and finished as the AL Cy Young runner-up twice.
“King Félix” also threw the 23rd perfect game in MLB history against the Rays on Aug. 15, 2012.
Hernández certainly has the accolades and the milestones, but the question is whether voters believe he had the longevity to earn a spot in Cooperstown. He may not reach the 75% threshold necessary for induction this year, but it’ll be worth monitoring his progress in years to come.
Is anyone on his last ballot?
It’s the last chance on the BBWAA ballot for Wagner. With 73.8% of the vote last time around, he just missed election to Cooperstown — but he’s been inching closer each year.
Wagner started his bid with just 10.5% of the vote in his debut in 2016, but he’s made sizable jumps in each of his past five years on the ballot. He jumped from 16.7% to 31.7% in 2020, then improved to 46.4% in ’21, 51% in ’22, 68.1% in ’23 and 73.8% in ’24.
Beltrán, Jones and Utley are three other candidates to keep an eye on.
Beltrán received 46.5% of the vote in his first year on the ballot in 2023, then jumped to 57.1% in ’24. He’ll be looking to continue that trajectory in his third year on the ballot as he hopes to move closer to 75%.
Jones, meanwhile, has seen a steady increase in recent years. After starting out with 7.3% in 2018 and 7.5% in ’19, he received 19.4% in ’20, 33.9% in ’21, 41.4% in ’22, 58.1% in ’23 and 61.6% in ’24.
And while Jones hopes to continue that climb toward 75%, Utley is looking to improve upon receiving 28.8% of the vote in his ballot debut last year. Though he still has a long way to go, it will be interesting to see how big of a jump Utley will make after a solid opening year.
When does the 2025 induction ceremony take place?
It will be held on Sunday, July 27, at the Clark Sports Center in Cooperstown, N.Y.
Are you curious about the 2025 Hall of Fame ballot? Look no further! Here are some frequently asked questions to help guide you through this exciting time in baseball history:1. Who is eligible for the 2025 Hall of Fame ballot?
– Players who have been retired for at least five years and have played in at least 10 seasons in the major leagues are eligible for the Hall of Fame ballot.2. How are players selected for the Hall of Fame ballot?
– Players are selected by the Baseball Writers’ Association of America (BBWAA) based on their career accomplishments and contributions to the game of baseball.3. What are the criteria for induction into the Hall of Fame?
– Players must receive at least 75% of the votes from the BBWAA in order to be inducted into the Hall of Fame. They must have made significant contributions to the game, both on and off the field.4. Who are some of the notable players on the 2025 Hall of Fame ballot?
– Some of the notable players on the 2025 Hall of Fame ballot include Derek Jeter, David Ortiz, and Alex Rodriguez.5. When will the results of the 2025 Hall of Fame ballot be announced?
– The results of the 2025 Hall of Fame ballot will be announced in January, with induction ceremonies taking place in July.Stay tuned for updates on the 2025 Hall of Fame ballot as we get closer to the announcement of the inductees!
Tags:
- Hall of Fame ballot 2025
- Baseball Hall of Fame FAQs
- 2025 Hall of Fame candidates
- Hall of Fame voting process
- Hall of Fame induction ceremony
- Hall of Fame eligibility rules
- Hall of Fame selection committee
- Hall of Fame voting statistics
- Hall of Fame ballot predictions
- Hall of Fame snubs 2025
#Frequently #asked #questions #Hall #Fame #ballot
2025 MLB Hall of Fame ballot update
In less than 24 hours, we’ll find out who the Baseball Writers’ Association of America has elected to the National Baseball Hall of Fame’s Class of 2025, joining Classic Era Committee electees Dick Allen and Dave Parker.
Thanks to Ryan Thibodaux’s Hall of Fame ballot tracker, we can keep up with how the voting is trending. And Jason Sardell, who has run simulations to project Hall of Fame vote totals for the past several years, has been providing periodic updates on projections for this year’s candidates.
One thing is certain: the drama will be high as we anticipate the official announcement, which will be made live on MLB Network at 6 p.m. ET. We could see something we’ve only seen once before in Hall of Fame history.
Only one player has been elected to the Hall of Fame with 100% of the vote (75% is needed for election). Mariano Rivera, the legendary Yankees closer who was inducted in 2019, received all 425 votes that year. He may have company in that exclusive club very soon.
Whether we’ll see another unanimous selection is one of several big questions as we anticipate the results that will complete the Hall of Fame class to be inducted at Cooperstown on July 27.
Note: All vote percentages from the ballot tracker are current as of Monday at 5 p.m. ET. All projections provided by Sardell are through 152 ballots input into Thibodaux’s tracker as of Jan. 14.
Ichiro Suzuki began making history the day he arrived in the Major Leagues. The first position player to make the jump from Nippon Professional Baseball to MLB, Ichiro quickly became a superstar. In 2001, he led the American League with a .350 batting average while leading all of baseball in hits (242) and steals (56).
He also dazzled defensively, winning the first of 10 consecutive Gold Glove Awards in right field. It all led to Ichiro becoming the second player to win his league’s Rookie of the Year Award and MVP Award in the same year, joining Fred Lynn (1975). Three years later, Ichiro won his second batting title by hitting .372 while setting the all-time single-season hits record with 262. He would have a total of 3,089 hits over a 19-year MLB career.
Ichiro might be on the cusp of making even more history two decades later. So far, Thibodaux’s tracker has Ichiro 188-for-188 on ballots with 48% known, on track to become the second player to be elected to the Hall of Fame unanimously.
CC Sabathia has received 93.6% of the vote so far, and the former star left-hander is trending toward election in his first year of eligibility, with Sardell projecting him to finish at 90%.
Over an illustrious 19-year Major League career spent with Cleveland, the Brewers and the Yankees, Sabathia was a six-time All-Star, the 2007 AL Cy Young Award winner, a top-five finisher in Cy Young voting five times, the 2009 AL Championship Series MVP and ’09 World Series champion with New York.
Sabathia is a member of the 3,000 strikeout club (3,093) and won 251 games. A workhorse on the mound, the big southpaw threw at least 200 innings in a season eight times. He is one of two pitchers this century to throw 10 or more complete games in a season, doing so in 2008 (also James Shields, 11 in 2011).
Last chance for Wagner — will he close the deal?
With 73.8% of the vote last year, former flamethrowing closer Billy Wagner just missed election to Cooperstown. Now he’s on his 10th and final BBWAA ballot. Will he seal the deal?
Wagner is currently at 84.6%, and Sardell projects him to finish comfortably over the election threshold at 82%. He’s been steadily gaining support over the years, making his biggest year-over-year jumps from 2019-20 (16.7% to 31.7%) and from 2022-23 (51% to 68.1%).
Eighth on the all-time saves list with 422 (two behind John Franco for seventh), Wagner was a seven-time All-Star and posted a 2.31 ERA with a 33% strikeout rate over 16 MLB seasons with the Astros, Phillies, Mets, Red Sox and Braves.
In 1999, he finished fourth in National League Cy Young Award voting after turning in a 1.57 ERA with 39 saves for Houston.
Wagner had an even better campaign with Philadelphia in 2005, when he finished with a 1.51 ERA and 38 saves. In 2010 — his final season in the Majors — he posted a 1.43 ERA with 37 saves for Atlanta in his age-38 campaign.
On his second ballot last year, Carlos Beltrán received 57.1% of the vote, a 10.6% increase from his debut ballot. According to Sardell’s projections, Beltrán — who has surely had his Hall of Fame candidacy impacted by his involvement in the 2017 Astros sign-stealing scandal — has a real chance to be elected in 2025.
So far, Beltrán is polling at 80.3% on Thibodaux’s tracker. Sardell projects he’ll get to 73% when it’s all said and done, noting that in 24% of his simulations, Beltrán crosses the 75% threshold for election. The former outfielder, who played for the Royals, Astros, Mets, Giants, Cardinals, Yankees and Rangers during a 20-year career, belted 435 home runs with an .836 OPS. He was the 1999 AL Rookie of the Year, a nine-time All-Star and a three-time Gold Glove Award winner.
Beltrán was legendary in the postseason. In 2004, he put together one of the greatest individual postseason performances of all time, producing a .435/.536/1.022 slash line with eight home runs in 12 games to help Houston reach the NLCS. Overall, he appeared in 65 career playoff games, posting a 1.021 OPS with 16 homers.
Given the way he’s trending, it seems that it’s only a matter of time before Beltrán is elected to the Hall of Fame. The question is, will that be this year?
Is time running out for Jones?
Andruw Jones was one of the greatest center fielders of his time, particularly on defense. He won 10 straight Gold Glove Awards with the Braves from 1998-2007 after becoming the youngest player to homer in a World Series game, going deep twice for Atlanta in Game 1 of the ’96 Fall Classic at age 19. In a 17-year career, he launched 434 home runs, including a then-franchise record 51 in 2005.
Will that be enough to get into the Hall of Fame?
The clock is ticking, and Jones doesn’t appear to be getting the type of surge he needs to get close to the 75 percent barrier in his eighth year of eligibility.
Last year, he received 61.6%, which was a 3.5% increase over 2023. In ’23, he jumped from 41.4% to 58.1%, but he’ll need another similar leap over his final three years of eligibility. Jones is currently at 72.3% in the HOF tracker, and Sardell projects he’ll end up with 70% with two years left on the ballot.
Who makes the biggest jump?
Beltrán is currently about 20% over where he finished last year, but so far, he isn’t enjoying the biggest jump in 2025 — that would be former Phillies second baseman Chase Utley.
Utley is currently polling at 53.2% in the HOF tracker after finishing at 28.8% last year. Sardell has him finishing at 42%. That bodes well for a candidate on his second ballot.
Over a 16-year Major League career, Utley was a six-time All-Star, a four-time Silver Slugger Award winner and a World Series champion with the Phillies in 2008. He hit 10 career postseason home runs, including five against the Yankees in the 2009 World Series alone.
According to Jay Jaffe’s JAWS system, Utley compares favorably to the average Hall of Fame second baseman, with only 11 players at the keystone position ranked ahead of him all-time.
Which first-year candidates stay on the ballot?
There are 14 first-time candidates on the ballot this year, and so far, it appears four of them are going to be safe from the dreaded “one-and-done” fate for falling short of 5%.
Ichiro, of course, is flirting with a unanimous selection, and Sabathia seems poised to be elected on his first ballot. The other two are Félix Hernández and Dustin Pedroia, each of whom is unlikely to be elected this year, but so far polling well above 5%.
Hernández, who has received 26.1% of the vote so far in the tracker, is projected to finish at 23%. He was a six-time All-Star and the 2010 AL Cy Young Award winner. He also led the league in ERA twice (2.27 in 2010, and 2.14 in ’14) and finished runner-up in Cy Young voting twice. He threw the 23rd perfect game in MLB history against the Rays on Aug. 15, 2012.
Pedroia, meanwhile, is currently polling at 15.4%, and he’s projected to finish at 11%. The hard-nosed second baseman was a four-time All-Star and a four-time Gold Glove Award winner over 14 seasons with the Red Sox from 2006-19. He was the 2007 AL Rookie of the Year and the 2008 AL MVP, helping Boston win the World Series in ’07 and ’13.
Among the remaining 10 first-time candidates, there are a handful who might finish just short of advancing to a second ballot — Russell Martin (currently at 3.7%), Ian Kinsler (3.7%) and Brian McCann (3.2%).
As we approach the 2025 MLB Hall of Fame ballot announcement, let’s take a look at some of the top candidates who could potentially be inducted this year.1. David Ortiz – The former Boston Red Sox slugger and World Series champion has been eligible for the Hall of Fame for the past few years and is considered a strong candidate for induction in 2025.
2. Alex Rodriguez – A-Rod, one of the most controversial players in MLB history, is also eligible for the Hall of Fame this year. Despite his past PED use, his impressive career numbers could make him a serious contender for induction.
3. Tim Lincecum – The former San Francisco Giants ace and two-time Cy Young Award winner is another player who could be on the ballot this year. Lincecum was dominant during his prime and could garner serious consideration from voters.
4. Carlos Beltran – The former outfielder and nine-time All-Star has been eligible for the Hall of Fame for a few years now. Beltran’s strong offensive numbers and defensive prowess could make him a top candidate for induction in 2025.
5. Jake Peavy – The former Cy Young Award winner and three-time All-Star could also be on the ballot this year. Peavy’s consistency and success during his career could earn him a spot in the Hall of Fame.
As we eagerly await the official announcement, it will be interesting to see which players will be inducted into the prestigious Hall of Fame in 2025. Stay tuned for updates and analysis on this year’s ballot!
Tags:
- 2025 MLB Hall of Fame
- Hall of Fame ballot update
- MLB Hall of Fame 2025
- Baseball Hall of Fame update
- MLB Hall of Fame candidates
- Hall of Fame voting update
- Baseball legends in Hall of Fame
- 2025 Hall of Fame ballot
- MLB Hall of Fame voting process
- Hall of Fame induction ceremony
#MLB #Hall #Fame #ballot #update
BOZICH | My weekly AP men’s college basketball Top 25 poll ballot | Louisville Sports
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (WDRB) — Iowa State. Marquette. Kansas. Michigan. UConn. Gonzaga. Memphis. Oregon. Utah State. And a long list of Southeastern Conference teams.
That’s the list of ranked men’s college basketball teams that lost at least one game last week.
Time to shuffle the teams and file another weekly ballot in the Associated Press Top 25 poll.
1. Auburn (17-1) — Freshman guard Tahaad Pettiford, a 44% three-point shooter, carried the Tigers past Georgia. They’re off until Tennessee visits Saturday.
2. Duke (16-2) — Only one ACC team has come within 10 points of the Blue Devils. Can Wake Forest become the second?
3. Houston (14-3) — The Cougars escaped at UCF but they’re the only unbeaten team in Big 12 play.
4. Michigan State (16-2) — The Spartans have won 11 straight since losing to Memphis in Maui.
5. Alabama (15-3) — Lose at home to Ole Miss. Win at Kentucky. Welcome to the SEC.
6. Iowa State (15-2) — The Cyclones discovered that even without Bob Huggins around, it’s not easy to win in Morgantown.
7. Florida (16-2) — The Gators rebounded from that one-point loss to Missouri by blitzing Texas.
8. Purdue (15-4) — The Boilermakers swept their West Coast road trip and now get three straight games in Mackey Arena.
9. Kentucky (14-4) — The Wildcats’ trip to Vanderbilt appears more daunting after the Commodores toppled Tennessee.
10. Tennessee (16-2) — I did not expect the Vols to get court-stormed by Vanderbilt.
11. Marquette (15-3) — The Golden Eagles gave up first place in the Big East by losing a home game to Xavier.
12. Michigan (14-4) — Losing an overtime game at Minnesota was a bad misstep but the Wolverines dodged another upset against Northwestern.
13. Kansas (13-4) — The Jayhawks’ sporadic offense did not show up at Iowa State.
14. Wisconsin (15-3) — The streaking Badgers got the first game in their West Coast trip by winning at USC. Can they get UCLA Tuesday?
15. Texas A&M (14-4) — The Aggies snapped their two-game losing streak by handling LSU but face road games with Ole Miss and Texas this week.
16. Mississippi State (15-3) — The Bulldogs ended their two-game losing streak by handling Ole Miss in overtime.
17. Illinois (13-5) — The Illini looked Final Four quality at Indiana and nearly toppled Michigan State in East Lansing.
18. Ole Miss (15-3) — The Rebels could not back up their win by Alabama by winning at Mississippi State. Who could?
19. St. John’s (16-3) — Wins over Georgetown and Seton Hall put Rick Pitino’s team atop the Big East.
20. Louisville (14-5) — As Virginia coach Ron Sanchez said Saturday, “(Louisville) is the hottest team in the league right now.”
21. Oregon (15-3) — The Ducks discovered that beating Purdue is a challenge, even at home.
22. Texas Tech (13-4) — Darrion Williams is one of the best players in the Big 12.
23. Missouri (15-3) — The Tigers have won four straight SEC games after losing their opener to Auburn.
24. West Virginia (13-4) — The Mountaineers have wins over Kansas, Iowa State and Gonzaga.
25. Clemson (15-4) — Road wins at Georgia Tech and Pitt enabled the Tigers to keep pace with Louisville in the ACC.
Copyright 2025 WDRB Media. All rights reserved.
As a college basketball enthusiast, I take great pride in my weekly AP men’s college basketball Top 25 poll ballot. This week, I am excited to share my rankings with you all.1. Gonzaga
2. Baylor
3. Michigan
4. Ohio State
5. Illinois
6. Villanova
7. Alabama
8. Houston
9. Iowa
10. West Virginia
11. Texas
12. Virginia
13. Florida State
14. Creighton
15. Oklahoma
16. Texas Tech
17. Kansas
18. USC
19. Virginia Tech
20. Tennessee
21. Missouri
22. Wisconsin
23. Purdue
24. Rutgers
25. Loyola ChicagoI believe these teams have shown consistency and strength throughout the season, and I am excited to see how they perform in the upcoming March Madness tournament. Stay tuned for more updates on college basketball and my weekly poll rankings. Let’s continue to support our favorite teams and enjoy the thrilling action on the court.
Tags:
- Men’s college basketball Top 25 poll
- AP poll ballot
- Louisville Sports
- BOZICH
- College basketball rankings
- NCAA basketball
- Louisville Cardinals
- Basketball poll
- AP Top 25
- College hoops ballot
#BOZICH #weekly #mens #college #basketball #Top #poll #ballot #Louisville #Sports