Tag: Ballots

  • Rejected mail-in ballots decreased in November election


    (The Center Square) – The number of Pennsylvania mail-in ballots rejected for errors decreased by 57% in the general election, according to Department of State.

    Of the roughly 1.9 million votes received on Nov. 5, one percent were tossed. In the April primary, 2.4 percent of ballots were rejected. The most common reasons were votes received after the 8 p.m. deadline on Election Day (33 percent), incorrect or missing dates (23 percent), no signature (17 percent), or missing secrecy envelope (15 percent).

    State Secretary Al Schmidt said improvements made between the two elections, including a year-long education initiative and early printing, “helped to significantly reduce the number of voters who were disenfranchised because of a mistake made when completing their mail ballot materials.”

    More than seven million ballots were cast in total on Election Day, with all eyes on Pennsylvania and its highly coveted nineteen electoral votes. Ultimately, President Donald Trump defeated Kamala Harris by 120,000, nearly tripling the margin that led him to victory over Hillary Clinton in 2016.

    Pennsylvania’s other national race for U.S. Senate, however, came down to less than 17,000 votes. The razor-thin margin meant that incumbent Democrat Bob Casey Jr. waited seventeen days to concede to Republican Dave McCormick as drama unfolded over defective mail-in ballots.

    During a Nov. 14 meeting, Bucks County Commission Chairwoman Diane Ellis-Marseglia said she knew counting roughly 400 votes without dates defied a state Supreme Court ruling, but she didn’t care.

    “I think we all know that precedent by a court does not matter anymore in this country, and people violate laws anytime they want,” she said. “So for me, if I violate this law, it’s because I want a court to pay attention.”

    And pay attention they did. Four days after the board’s action, the state Supreme Court reaffirmed that the ballots were defective.

    The 4-3 order came after the state and national Republican Party filed for extraordinary relief over the issue, which also unfolded in Centre, Montgomery and Philadelphia counties.

    In a concurring statement, Justice Kevin Brobson reminded local officials they lack any authority to interpret state law. Justices David Wecht and Sally Updyke Mundy agreed.

    “I write separately to disabuse local elections officials of the notion that they have the authority to ignore Election Code provisions that they believe are unconstitutional,” he said. “Only the courts under our charter may declare a statute, or provision thereof, unconstitutional.”

    In December, Rep. Joe D’Orsie, R-York, said he’s drafting legislation that would give the state House the power to remove county and municipal officials, like Ellis-Marseglia, from office. It would be similar to the impeachment process and would ultimately require voter approval.

    Christina Lengyel is a Pennsylvania reporter for The Center Square. She is based in Harrisburg.

    This article was republished with permission from The Center Square.



    In the November election, the number of rejected mail-in ballots decreased significantly compared to previous elections. This is a promising sign that election officials and voters are becoming more familiar with the mail-in voting process and are taking the necessary steps to ensure their ballots are counted.

    According to data released by election officials, the rate of rejected mail-in ballots in November was lower than in previous elections. This is likely due to increased awareness and education around the proper way to fill out and return mail-in ballots.

    While there were still some ballots that were rejected for various reasons, such as missing signatures or improper marking, the overall decrease in rejected ballots is a positive development for the integrity of the election process.

    Moving forward, it will be important for election officials to continue to educate voters on the proper procedures for filling out and returning mail-in ballots to further reduce the number of rejected ballots in future elections. This will help ensure that every vote is counted and that the election results accurately reflect the will of the voters.

    Tags:

    1. Mail-in ballots
    2. November election
    3. Rejected ballots
    4. Election results
    5. Voting process
    6. Election updates
    7. Ballot counting
    8. Voter turnout
    9. Election integrity
    10. Political news

    #Rejected #mailin #ballots #decreased #November #election

  • Report: Smaller percent of Pa. mail ballots rejected in last election


    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=17KCv8_0yXQOfpt00

    Harrisburg, Pa. — On Friday, the Shapiro Administration announced a 57% decrease in the percentage of mail ballots rejected in the November general election compared to the April primary.

    The November general election saw an overall voter turnout of 77%, with 2.2 million approved mail ballot applications and an 89% return rate for those mail ballots. Of the returned mail ballots, 1% were rejected, which was a 57% decrease from the April primary, when 2.4% were rejected.

    Among the many changes the Administration implemented in 2024 were a year-long voter education initiative and a Department of State directive that required counties to preprint the full year on mail ballot return envelopes beginning with the November general election.

    Of the roughly 1% of mail ballots rejected in the 2024 general election, the most common reasons for rejection were:

    receipt after the 8 p.m. deadline on Election Day (33%),incorrect or missing date (23%),lack of a signature (17%), andlack of a secrecy envelope (15%).

    In addition to a voter education initiative and the directive requiring the full year be preprinted on the outer mail ballot return envelope, the Shapiro Administration made other efforts to simplify the process of voting by mail and better inform the public on how to properly cast a mail ballot, including:

    Introducing redesigned mail ballot instruction materials .Providing a redesigned, user-friendly online mail ballot application and a streamlined application process.Encouraging young voters to participate through the Pennsylvania Campus Voting Challenge .Partnering with the Pennsylvania Department of Aging to provide older voters with trustworthy information about voting by mail.Educating all Pennsylvanians on voting by mail and on election security through a digital ad campaign .

    Secretary of the Commonwealth Al Schmidt emphasized that the Department will continue its work to decrease the percentage of rejected mail ballots during this year’s municipal elections.

    “Ensuring every registered Pennsylvania voter had the ability to cast their ballot and have that vote counted was a top priority in 2024 for the Shapiro Administration,” Schmidt said. “The many improvements the Administration made throughout the year helped to significantly reduce the number of voters who were disenfranchised because of a mistake made when completing their mail ballot materials.”

    “While the Shapiro Administration is pleased with these improved numbers for 2024,” Schmidt said, “the Department of State will continue to work with county elections officials to ensure every eligible Pennsylvanian’s legally cast vote can be counted in 2025.”

    Official vote totals for all statewide races can be found on the Department’s website . For more information on voting in Pennsylvania, call the Department of State’s year-round voter hotline at 1-877-VOTESPA, visit vote.pa.gov , or follow #ReadytoVotePA on social media.



    In the most recent election in Pennsylvania, a smaller percentage of mail-in ballots were rejected compared to previous elections, according to a new report.

    The report, which analyzed data from the Pennsylvania Department of State, found that only 1.3% of mail-in ballots were rejected in the last election. This is a significant decrease from the 2020 election, where 1.9% of mail-in ballots were rejected.

    The decrease in rejected mail-in ballots is attributed to improvements in the mail-in voting process, including better communication with voters about the requirements for submitting a ballot and increased resources for election officials to process and verify ballots.

    Overall, the report suggests that Pennsylvania is making progress in ensuring that all eligible voters have the opportunity to participate in the democratic process through mail-in voting. With continued efforts to streamline the process and educate voters, the state can further reduce the number of rejected mail-in ballots in future elections.

    Tags:

    1. Pennsylvania mail-in ballots
    2. Election mail-in ballot report
    3. Voting trends in Pennsylvania
    4. Mail-in ballot rejection rates
    5. 2020 election mail-in voting
    6. Pennsylvania election data
    7. Voter turnout in PA
    8. Voting by mail statistics
    9. Pennsylvania election analysis
    10. Impact of mail-in voting in Pennsylvania

    #Report #Smaller #percent #mail #ballots #rejected #election

  • Baseball Hall of Fame ballots 2025: The Athletic’s voters explain their selections


    The night before Ken Griffey Jr. and Mike Piazza were inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame in 2016, I was lucky enough to be in the plaque room in Cooperstown, N.Y., standing behind Cal Ripken Jr. in line to get a drink.

    As I looked around the room, I saw Randy Johnson pointing out his plaque to friends, a smile on his face that was never seen on the field. I saw Pedro Martinez and Juan Marichal sitting at a table talking, and wished I were a Spanish-speaking fly on the wall to hear that conversation. As I nursed a beer in the corner, Barry Larkin came over and asked how I was doing.

    “Dude, I shouldn’t be here,” I said to Larkin, whom I’d covered briefly late in his Hall of Fame career, while looking around at so many of the game’s legends. “I don’t belong here.”

    “I know what you’re saying,” Larkin said.

    I was incredulous and pointed in the direction of his plaque: “Barry, you can’t. Your face is over there.”

    “Bro,” Larkin said, dead serious. “I get it. I don’t feel like I belong here either.”

    That interaction stuck with me, and I remember it every year when the Hall of Fame ballot arrives in November.

    The ballot itself is an unremarkable piece of office paper and comes with simple instructions. There are 30 or so names (28 this year) with boxes beside them, and a place to sign the ballot, making it official.

    Some scoff at the Hall using paper ballots, delivered by mail and returned in a pre-paid envelope. But the fact that it’s an actual, tangible piece of paper makes the already weighty assignment feel heavier.

    I have been voting for the Hall of Fame since the 2015 election, marking Pedro Martinez and Randy Johnson on my first ballot among eight other names. Each time has been an honor. Over the years, I’ve also had countless discussions with other voters, Hall of Famers and people in the game about what makes a Hall of Famer.

    I have my own beliefs, but so do the roughly 400 other voters, each with their own reasoning and bar to clear. It’s difficult to get a consensus of 75 percent of the voters to agree on anything, but nearly every year the baseball writers find someone worthy to reach that threshold. Even here at The Athletic, we have different ideas about Hall voting; each, I believe, is well thought out, with the process taken seriously — so seriously, in fact, that we believe we should show you how we voted, but also why we voted as we did.

    The 2025 Hall of Fame class will be announced next Tuesday and immortalized, along with Dick Allen and Dave Parker, this summer in Cooperstown. Here are the ballots of 12 of The Athletic’s Hall of Fame voters and, in their words, more on their selections. — C. Trent Rosecrans


    In awe of the Hall: Barry Larkin in 2016, four years after he was inducted. (Jim McIsaac / Getty Images)

    Daniel Barbarisi’s ballot

    Carlos Beltrán, Andruw Jones, CC Sabathia, Ichiro Suzuki, Billy Wagner

    When Hall of Fame season was getting underway this past fall, I got a message from one of the guys I was a Red Sox beat writer with in the late 2000s, someone who had covered Dustin Pedroia at the same time I did. He asked, pointedly, are you voting for Pedey?

    Pedroia is something of a cause célèbre among a group of voters, and I get that. He was fun to cover, he was relentless and productive and more than all of that, he was inspiring. This was a guy who clearly wasn’t supposed to be there, who made his life’s work about getting in the faces of people who didn’t believe in him and showing them that he could kick as much ass as the next player, and probably more, because he wanted it more.

    Writers will sometimes pose the (imperfect, incomplete) question: Does it feel like I’m watching a Hall of Famer? With Pedroia, in the late 2000s, it did. Elite, distinctive, rose to the moment, delivered consistency and impact at the plate and in the field, won awards, won World Series, made things feel bigger than they were. The peak was there. But it didn’t last.

    Look over his counting stats — 1,805 hits, 140 home runs, 138 steals, 725 RBIs, and so on — and they are hallmarks of a career that feels incomplete. One moment Pedroia was a metronomic presence at the heart of the Red Sox lineup, and the next he was just … gone, replaced by a new generation of stars, supposed to be the bridge from the 2007 group to the up-and-comers who won the 2018 title, but in reality he was largely absent after a devastating 2017 knee injury.

    Was that a singular moment that wrecked an otherwise Hall of Fame career? Yes and no. It was the injury he couldn’t come back from, but there were numerous others before that, wear-and-tear injuries, pushed-too-hard injuries, the problems that come from putting that level of torque and that level of himself into every ferocious hack. I think back on Pedroia’s swing and the word that comes to mind is violence. It looked like he was summoning everything he had for the fifth pitch of the third at-bat of the night for a 2009 Tuesday night game against the Orioles, and he did that every single game, always. That adds up.

    I grew up in New York thinking Don Mattingly was both the greatest ever to play and a clear Hall of Famer, and the similarities between the two cases are pretty obvious. As a kid or even a young adult, you don’t really understand why someone like Mattingly doesn’t make the cut, and feel a slight resentment about that. But years ago, I remember hearing Mattingly discuss his own candidacy with remarkable clarity: how grateful he was to be considered, and how he was acutely aware that he was not a Hall of Famer. The numbers weren’t there. That peak matters, but so does longevity; he had one at a Hall of Fame level and not quite the other.

    Pedroia’s career is impressive enough that it shouldn’t be seen in the context of What Could Have Been. But when it comes to the Hall of Fame, it’s hard not to wonder.

    Dustin Pedroia


    Dustin Pedroia dives for a grounder in 2019, his 14th and final season. (Billie Weiss / Boston Red Sox / Getty Images)

    Tim Britton’s ballot

    Bobby Abreu, Carlos Beltrán, Félix Hernández, Dustin Pedroia, Andy Pettitte, CC Sabathia, Ichiro Suzuki, Chase Utley, Billy Wagner, David Wright

    Look, I cover the Mets, so I understand one fan base’s case against Chase Utley’s Hall of Fame candidacy. But to me, Utley is an easy call. He produced like a legitimate MVP candidate for five seasons and like an All-Star for 10. He was the ringleader for a team that won five divisions, two pennants and a championship. He was baseball’s best second baseman for a decade, and he should not be dispatched into a group with Bobby Grich and Lou Whitaker as should-be Hall of Famers at second base who haven’t made the cut.

    Utley leads a group of similar candidates who excelled for around a decade but lacked the longevity to reach the counting stats of traditional Hall of Famers. David Wright was right there with Adrián Beltré as the sport’s premier third basemen for a decade. Dustin Pedroia took the mantle at the keystone from Utley. And Félix Hernández was historically good through his 20s — good enough to mitigate the abruptness of his decline in his 30s. The sport has changed, most obviously for starting pitchers, leading me to place an even higher value on a player’s peak, especially when it extends for nine or 10 seasons.

    (For what it’s worth, Andruw Jones would fall into this category as well. However, I do not vote for Jones because of his 2012 arrest on battery charges in a domestic assault incident.)

    Daniel Brown’s ballot

    Bobby Abreu, Carlos Beltrán, Andruw Jones, Manny Ramirez, Alex Rodriguez, CC Sabathia, Ichiro Suzuki, Chase Utley, Billy Wagner

    Here’s hoping we can avoid the “which” hunt this year — as in, Which freaking voter kept Ichiro from being a unanimous selection? The 10-time All-Star looks poised to accomplish what another former Mariners outfielder, Ken Griffey Jr., barely missed when three voters left him off the ballot in 2016.

    Ichiro would be the first position player to get 100 percent of the writers’ vote and just the second player behind reliever Mariano Rivera, who went 425 for 425 in 2019. And if Ichiro isn’t unanimous, well, that’ll be just as hard to explain as the voters who snubbed immortals such as Willie Mays (left off 23 ballots), Mickey Mantle (43) and Yogi Berra (59).

    My favorite Ichiro stat: Among batters with at least 2,000 plate appearances, he is the only left-handed hitter in MLB history with a reverse platoon split. He batted .329 against lefties and .304 against righties.

    As for my other checkmarks: I continue to struggle with players linked to performance-enhancing drugs, but once Bud Selig, Tony La Russa and other leaders who profited from that era were welcomed into Cooperstown, it complicated the equation.

    CC Sabathia stands out from the starting pitcher pack on this ballot. As Jay Jaffe noted on FanGraphs, Sabathia leads pitchers from this class in WAR, WAR7-Adj and S-Jaws. I also agree with Jaffe that “we won’t see his kind again; nobody born after 1966 has topped his 3,577 1/3 innings, and Sabathia was born 14 years later.”


    Ichiro topped 200 hits in each of his first 10 seasons in MLB. (Otto Greule Jr / Getty Images)

    Steve Buckley’s ballot

    Carlos Beltrán, Andruw Jones, Dustin Pedroia, Andy Pettitte, Jimmy Rollins, CC Sabathia, Ichiro Suzuki, Chase Utley, Billy Wagner, David Wright

    CC Sabathia is a lock to be elected to the Hall of Fame in this, his first year on the ballot. That’s as it should be.

    What we also know, thanks to the ceaseless sleuthing from the crew at Baseball Hall of Fame Vote Tracker, is that the big lefty will not be a unanimous selection. And that’s a head-scratcher, frankly.

    Tell you what I’m going to do: Rather than make the Cooperstown case for Sabathia by rolling out all kinds of charts, diagrams and View-Master slides, I’ll just invite you to google “CC Sabathia,” “Hall of Fame” and “duh,” and that’ll take you where you need to go. (I tried it. It works!)

    What I’d like to do with my turn, here on The Athletic’s Open Mic Night (Baseball Hall of Fame edition), is address the appointment viewing that occurred whenever Sabathia was on the mound during his 19 seasons in the big leagues. You know what appointment viewing is when it comes to pitching, right? That’s when a team has a pitcher whose stuff, whose presence, whose personality, is such that you make it your business to always know when he’s doing his business. That’s what you do with the great ones: A note is made, either in the head or in a little gizmo, about when the next start will be. And you don’t miss it. If the manager has reshuffled the rotation due to an off-day or rainout, you adjust your own schedule accordingly.

    When I was growing up in Cambridge, Mass., it was Luis Tiant. Much later on, when I was writing about the Red Sox for a living, it was Roger Clemens and then Pedro Martinez, along with a dash of Curt Schilling, even before the bloody sock. Sabathia is in their company, mostly because of his stellar pitching but also because, sure, he’s a big fella who sometimes wore his cap tilted over the right eye. You could have dropped out of the sky, new to baseball, and instantly recognized Sabathia’s importance.

    I loved watching Sabathia pitch. I admired him for what struck me as an off-the-charts earnestness, as though he wasn’t just pitching for his team but for whatever city he happened to be based in at the time. Though born and raised in the Bay Area, he was a Cleveland guy when he was pitching for the Indians, a Milwaukee guy during that magical half season with the Brewers, and, yes, absolutely, a New York guy during his 11 seasons with the Yankees.

    Media people aren’t supposed to root for this or that player, but it’s perfectly acceptable to admire the artistry. In fact, I encourage it. And CC Sabathia, artist in residence in Cleveland, in Milwaukee, in New York, was someone every ballplayer should strive to be. In this age of openers and pitch counts, we just don’t have enough of his type anymore.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    Why Dustin Pedroia has a checkmark on my Hall of Fame ballot

    Marc Carig’s ballot

    Carlos Beltrán, Félix Hernández, Andruw Jones, CC Sabathia, Ichiro Suzuki, Billy Wagner

    One afternoon before a game, I was chatting with CC Sabathia in the Yankees’ clubhouse, where the franchise’s retired numbers are displayed for all to see. He motioned toward the array of numerals — shorthand for the idea of greatness in the Bronx —  and uttered a phrase that over the years became one of his mantras: “The pinstripes are heavy.”

    Yet, Sabathia spent a career meeting expectations that were as outsized as his talent and personality. He starred in Cleveland, a franchise long dependent on its ability to be right about its young talent. Sabathia was a first-rounder and subsequently pitched like it. Upon his deadline trade to the Brewers in 2008, Sabathia pitched on short rest in the heat of a pennant race, even though he knew his Milwaukee tenure was likely a three-month pit stop ahead of free agency. It’s a feat that only grows more impressive over time. Then, Sabathia arrived in New York before the 2009 season as the jewel of a $423 million offseason, a spasm of Steinbrenner-esque spending that represented the franchise’s desperation to end a nine-year title drought.

    That investment paid off immediately. Months later, Sabathia and the Yankees were headed up the Canyon of Heroes. Sabathia was brought in to be an ace and a leader, and needed just one season to accomplish the goal.

    Hall of Famers should be dominant for a long period of time. For me, it’s the primary prerequisite. Sabathia fulfilled that requirement, all while shouldering the weight of expectations. He was an ace, and for a long time, he pitched like it.

    As did Félix Hernández. We can debate the breadth of King Félix’s career accomplishments, but this feels clear: Hernández was so dominant that he’s precisely the kind of player we should want to celebrate.

    Billy Wagner made his mark as a reliever. Few players have been so far ahead of their time, and Wagner racked up strikeouts at a staggering rate for his era. Carlos Beltrán as an all-around player was a sight to behold — gifted both physically and intellectually. Andruw Jones’ greatness in center did not require the aid of advanced metrics to appreciate. And Ichiro’s inclusion requires little commentary: simply one of the best to ever swing a bat.

    Dan Hayes’ ballot

    Carlos Beltrán, Andruw Jones, CC Sabathia, Ichiro Suzuki, Chase Utley, Billy Wagner

    Here’s hoping Carlos Beltrán continues trending in the right direction toward Hall of Fame election.

    This is Beltrán’s third year on the ballot. Last year, he jumped 10.6 percent from his 2023 debut, garnering 57.1 percent of the vote. In 2023, Beltrán received only 46.5 percent approval, which was likely an indication some voters were punishing him for his leading role in the 2017 Houston Astros’ sign-stealing scandal.

    Perhaps it was collective fatigue from 2022, when the Baseball Writers’ Association of America turned away Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Curt Schilling (I voted for all three every time), but I checked “yes” for Beltrán in 2023. I don’t condone what Beltrán did in Houston and understand why others might have chosen to leave his name unchecked in that first year.

    But maybe the electorate is open to changing its mind on a very worthy player.

    No other Astros players were punished and A.J. Hinch and Alex Cora have returned to the dugout. Beltrán has paid more for his role than anyone else involved. Since the Mets fired him as their manager in 2020, no other team has considered him for any type of coaching role.

    Beltrán was amazing throughout his career. He arrived with authority, winning the 1999 Rookie of the Year Award, and rarely slowed down. After he was fortunate enough to be traded from Kansas City in 2004, Beltrán lived up to the hype almost everywhere he went.

    His first postseason is one of the greatest performances of all time. His overall postseason play was incredible, slugging 16 homers and nabbing all 11 stolen bases he attempted. Beltrán conquered New York with the Mets. He was a five-tool stud for the first 10 years and a great hitter after that.

    I’m just hoping we don’t exclude yet another amazing player.


    Carlos Beltrán, pictured in 2012 with the Cardinals, had a 1.021 OPS over 256 career plate appearances in the postseason. (Jamie Squire / Getty Images)

    Chad Jennings’ ballot

    Bobby Abreu, Carlos Beltrán, Andruw Jones, Russell Martin, Dustin Pedroia, CC Sabathia, Ichiro Suzuki, Chase Utley, Billy Wagner, David Wright

    There seems to be a theory — maybe it’s more of a hot take — that if you must ask whether a player is a Hall of Famer, then he’s not a Hall of Famer. It sounds profound, but it’s cheap, lazy and wrong. We don’t always know greatness when we see it, and the Hall of Fame deserves more than gut instinct.

    All of which is to say that I, too, never thought Russell Martin was a Hall of Famer when he was playing. I covered him in New York, but it never once crossed my mind that I would one day vote for him to be enshrined in Cooperstown.

    Now, I wonder if I simply didn’t recognize Martin’s impact as it was happening. It’s possible, of course, that I’m putting too much emphasis on his pitch framing ability, but it’s also possible that framing is so valuable — and so revered — that it’s going to determine the sport’s next technological breakthrough. Current data shows that Martin was on the leading edge of that skill set, and if your gut says that Yadier Molina (55.6 WAR per FanGraphs) is going to be a Hall of Famer in a few years, then you need to think long and hard about Martin (54.5).

    Of course, that doesn’t make Martin a can’t-miss case, but such players are few and far between. (Ichiro is probably the only one on this ballot.) It takes almost 300 votes for a player to be elected, which has led me to be more of a “Big Hall” voter, and high-peak players fit my vision of Cooperstown. It turns out, so do some players I didn’t recognize as Hall of Famers until it came time to vote.

    Keith Law’s ballot

    Carlos Beltrán, Andruw Jones, Alex Rodriguez, CC Sabathia, Ichiro Suzuki, Chase Utley

    I believe this is my smallest ballot since I became a Hall voter, but I’ve always been a “Small Hall” person. There was just too big of a backlog of players because of voter squeamishness over anyone with a possible connection to PED usage that, when I first started voting, I didn’t have enough room for everyone I wanted to check off. All of those candidates either got in or reached their 10-year limit on the ballot, and now we get one or maybe two easy yeses in each year — and some years, we get none.

    Of the six players I did check this year, only Ichiro is a no-brainer; even if someone wanted to quibble with his MLB performance, his impact on the global game is more than enough to make him an inner-circle Hall of Famer. CC Sabathia is the other new candidate for whom I voted, and he just squeaks over the line for me; his performance is quite comparable to that of Andy Pettitte, for whom I have never voted, but Sabathia’s reputation around the game as a clubhouse leader and the way he has used his voice and stature after his playing career to speak out about racial inequities in the game are separating factors for me. Our sport needs more CC Sabathias. We were, and still are, lucky to have him.

    Stephen J. Nesbitt’s ballot

    Bobby Abreu, Carlos Beltrán, Andruw Jones, Andy Pettitte, Manny Ramirez, Alex Rodriguez, CC Sabathia, Ichiro Suzuki, Chase Utley, Billy Wagner

    As a first-time Hall of Fame voter, choosing the boxes to check on your maiden ballot brings with it an amalgam of anticipation, remember-some-guys nostalgia and pressure to firmly plant your flag. And after year upon year of reading writers’ lengthy throat clearing at the start of ballot explainers, I will skip straight to the bullet points.

    • I voted for 10 players. It’s harder than ever to become a Hall of Famer. I will not make that more difficult by delighting in showing off my selectivity.

    • I voted for the steroid guys. Many writers refuse to vote for any player reported to have used PEDs. Others put Alex Rodriguez and Manny Ramirez in a distinct category because they were suspended multiple times after MLB established clear rules. There are cheaters of many forms in the Hall of Fame. If a player is on the ballot, and therefore eligible for election, I will judge them on the factor this game has always held most sacred: numbers. Rodriguez and Ramirez were greats. They have my vote and will surely still fall far short of 75 percent.

    • I voted for Bobby Abreu. That he wasn’t thought of as a future Hall of Famer during his playing career means nothing. It is only an indictment of what was valued at the time.

    • I voted for Andy Pettitte, with my final vote, over Félix Hernández and Mark Buehrle, a threesome I had never expected to consider side-by-side-by-side. There are already too few starters making it to Cooperstown, and that trend will only worsen with current pitching trends. (The longevity-versus-peak debate cannot function once longevity is no longer an option.) All three of these starters had a career 117 ERA+. I enjoyed that. Hernández had the peak, and I expect to vote for him in future years. Buehrle lasted longer, won four Gold Glove awards and a World Series ring. But it’s past time for the induction of Pettitte, whose résumé includes longevity, cold hard stats, postseason success and five World Series titles.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    Stark: Why I voted for Andy Pettitte for the Hall of Fame for the first time


    Bobby Abreu (60.2 career bWAR) has never topped 16 percent of the vote. (George Widman / Associated Press)

    David O’Brien’s ballot

    Carlos Beltrán, Andruw Jones, Brian McCann, CC Sabathia, Ichiro Suzuki, Chase Utley, Billy Wagner

    Andruw Jones is considered by many to be the greatest defensive center fielder in a half-century or more. Couple his 10 consecutive Gold Gloves with 434 career home runs, and it’s understandable why so many former players, along with Braves fans, find it unfathomable that Jones hasn’t been elected to the Hall of Fame in seven tries.

    I get why some writers leave him off their ballots. It’s his modest .254 career batting average and 111 OPS+, and the precipitous decline after his age-30 season, his last with Atlanta. He hit .210 with 66 homers and a 95 OPS+ over his final five seasons with four other teams.

    But dig deeper and realize Jones debuted at 19. In a 10-year stretch beginning at age 21, he averaged 34 homers, 103 RBIs and 158 games played while slugging .504 and winning a Gold Glove every season. To repeat, he averaged 34 homers and 104 RBIs while winning Gold Gloves every season for a decade.

    Now, what if he debuted at, say, 22, and had that 10-year stretch from ages 24 through 33? How many would use a sharp decline in his ages 34-38 seasons as a reason to keep a perennial Gold Glover and prolific middle-of-the-order hitter out of Cooperstown? With some, perception has overridden a staggering decade of performance by Jones, the likes of which we’ve seen from few center fielders not named Mays, Mantle or Griffey.

    Perhaps I’m stunned Jones is not in the Hall because I covered so many games during his peak years — first, as a Marlins beat writer who watched Jones routinely erase potential Florida runs and drive in so many for the Braves beginning in his first full season in 1997. Then as a Braves beat writer beginning in 2002, I saw him win countless games with his glove and bat through 2007.

    Consider: Jones finished with about 50 more Defensive Runs Saved than the immortal Willie Mays, and 30 more than cannon-armed Roberto Clemente. Those icons are the only two outfielders with more Gold Gloves than Jones; Mays and Clemente won 12 apiece after the award began in 1957.

    Besides Jones, the only players to win at least 10 Gold Gloves and hit 400 or more homers: Mays, Ken Griffey Jr. and Mike Schmidt, three first-ballot Hall of Famers.

    This is Jones’ eighth year on the ballot, and it looks as if he’s going to miss again, albeit by a smaller margin than seemed likely a few years ago when he was named on barely 40 percent of ballots. Jones inched his way up to 61.6 percent in 2024, and this year he’ll likely move closer to the 75 percent threshold required for election, based on the publicly released ballots as of Monday (72.6 percent).

    But voting percentages typically drop at least 5 percent after all ballots are counted, including those not made public before the big announcement, so Jones probably will fall short. If so, he would have two more chances to get in through the writers’ vote.

    It’s going to be close, but I think he’ll be voted in by the writers a year from now or in his final year of eligibility. If not, it’ll be up to an Era Committee to vote Jones into the Hall. And I’m confident they would, given the makeup of those committees, which typically include plenty of former players and managers.

    C. Trent Rosecrans’ ballot

    Bobby Abreu, Carlos Beltrán, Andruw Jones, Andy Pettitte, Manny Ramirez, Alex Rodriguez, CC Sabathia, Ichiro Suzuki, Chase Utley, Billy Wagner

    One of the criticisms I hear about Hall of Fame voting is, how can a player not be worth a Hall of Fame vote one year and then be worth a checkmark the next year? You’re a Hall of Famer or not, right?

    But each year has a different electorate after gaining and losing voters, usually replacing older voters with younger ones. That not only changes who is voting, but also how we view the game and our evaluation tools. And each year is a different ballot with different names, but the same limit of 10 choices among those listed.

    Each voter deals with the rule of 10 in their own way. Some never have to consider it because they wouldn’t vote for that many players. Others have to make a distinction between two players with similar cases. Still others look at trends and try to navigate more rules, weighing which players could drop off the ballot if they don’t receive the required 5 percent of the vote or which players are nearing the end of their 10 years of eligibility.

    Bobby Abreu and Billy Wagner are on their sixth and 10th years on the ballot, respectively. For the second time, I voted for Abreu. For the third time, I voted for Wagner. That means I didn’t vote for Abreu four times and didn’t vote for Wagner seven times. At no point did either man’s statistics change.

    There are easy names on the ballot most years, like Ichiro Suzuki this year, but the rest are more difficult to decide. I always believed both Abreu and Wagner were great players with great careers, but before my more recent Hall of Fame research work, I had them below the line for entrance. Over the years, I’ve changed my stance, even if that hasn’t always meant they got my vote. On the ballot for the 2023 class, I voted for both; last year, I only voted for Wagner; this year, I again voted for both.

    In 2024, Wagner came within five votes of election.

    Although he was once again around my line of demarcation to make the Hall, Wagner was an easy pick in his final year of eligibility. In the end, I’d rather be the reason someone gained entrance into the Hall of Fame than the reason they were kept out.

    Will I continue this way? I don’t know. Each year is its own discussion and each ballot has its own context. I always take that into consideration, an imperfect solution to an imperfect process.


    Billy Wagner garnered 73.8 percent of the vote last year. (Paul J. Bereswill / Associated Press)

    Eno Sarris’ ballot

    Bobby Abreu, Carlos Beltrán, Félix Hernández, Andruw Jones, Brian McCann, Andy Pettitte, CC Sabathia, Ichiro Suzuki, Chase Utley, Billy Wagner

    Framing is on the ballot for the first time.

    Whether you think of framing as “stealing strikes” or “presenting,” the skill has real value. When Russell Martin, Yadier Molina, and Brian McCann were catching, baseball was just figuring out how to assign a number to how much framing was worth. The trio ended up being the three best framers in the history of the statistic, as a result of their excellence — but also because the rest of the league hadn’t caught up yet.

    When those three were getting called strikes on more than half of the pitches they received in the shadow zone — the borderline space that’s half-in, half-out of the strike zone — there were also catchers who were getting strike calls on only a third of those opportunities. The trio racked up framing stats because the worst framers at the time were terrible. The worst regular catcher this year (Korey Lee) got strikes on 43 percent of the takes he saw in the shadow zone; the best (Patrick Bailey) got strikes on 53 percent. The league has figured this out. Framing is valued.

    Consequently, if you re-racked the careers of this trio of great defensive catchers and started them now, even with the same work on the field, they wouldn’t achieve the same relative value when compared to their peers. The framing numbers that put all three into the top 15 catchers of all time by FanGraphs’ WAR would no longer be there for them.

    But this happens all the time. Babe Ruth hit 54 homers in a year when second place hit 19 homers. We don’t take that value away from him just because the league hadn’t quite figured out the value of slugging. Dazzy Vance struck out guys way before that was in vogue — he leads in career-adjusted strikeout percentage, and he’s in the Hall of Fame. The sport usually rewards trailblazers.

    All that said — and even though catcher is the most under-represented position in the Hall — I balked at Martin’s offensive stats. A career .248/.349/.397 line with 191 homers and 101 steals didn’t pass my sniff test. McCann hit .262/.337/.452 with 282 homers and was nearly the same framer, so he got my vote.

    But I hope Martin makes it to another ballot. For all the bellyaching I did about his offense, I made an uncomfortable realization late in the process — Molina’s career OPS was worse than Martin’s. And Molina will get my vote.


    Hall of Fame ballot columns from The Athletic

    Ken Rosenthal’s and Tyler Kepner’s respective ballot columns published last week. Jayson Stark’s ballot column will be published later this week.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    Rosenthal: Why CC Sabathia received my Hall of Fame vote this year and Andy Pettitte did not

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    Kepner: Why Félix Hernández fell just short on my Hall of Fame ballot — and why I’m grateful he’s still in play


    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    Five things to watch on the 2025 Baseball Hall of Fame ballot

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    Baseball Hall of Fame reader survey results: How Ichiro, Wagner, Sabathia and more fared

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    A salute to Ichiro, CC Sabathia and the other 12 newcomers to the Baseball Hall of Fame ballot

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    Baseball Hall of Fame tiers: Which active players are on course for Cooperstown?

    (Top image: Dan Goldfarb / The Athletic. Photos: Ichiro Suzuki: Tom DiPace / Sports Illustrated / Getty Images; CC Sabathia: Rich Pilling / MLB Photos / Getty Images; Billy Wagner: Jonathan Daniel / Getty Images) 



    As the 2025 Baseball Hall of Fame ballots are being finalized, The Athletic reached out to some of their top writers and analysts to explain their selections. With a stacked group of eligible players this year, the voters had some tough decisions to make. From first-time eligible stars to controversial returning candidates, here’s a look at why The Athletic’s voters made their picks for the 2025 Hall of Fame class.

    First and foremost, the voters considered players’ on-field performance and impact on the game. Statistical analysis played a big role in their decision-making process, as they looked at traditional stats like batting average and home runs, as well as advanced metrics like WAR and wRC+. They also took into account postseason success, awards won, and overall contributions to their teams.

    But it wasn’t just about the numbers for The Athletic’s voters. They also considered players’ character, integrity, and sportsmanship, as well as their impact on the game off the field. This meant weighing controversial figures like Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens against players with cleaner reputations.

    In the end, the voters had to make some tough choices. Some players fell just short of the 75% threshold needed for induction, while others received overwhelming support. But regardless of the final outcome, each voter took their responsibility seriously and carefully considered each player’s candidacy.

    As the ballots are tallied and the 2025 Hall of Fame class is announced, fans will undoubtedly debate the decisions made by The Athletic’s voters. But one thing is for certain: the Baseball Hall of Fame is a prestigious honor, and only the best of the best will earn their spot in Cooperstown.

    Tags:

    Baseball Hall of Fame, Hall of Fame ballots, Baseball Hall of Fame 2025, The Athletic, voters, selections, baseball, MLB, voting process

    #Baseball #Hall #Fame #ballots #Athletics #voters #explain #selections

  • Ballots due today at 5pm pt


    OK, Academy Members, time is up. Extensions are almost over, and this is your last warning to cast your Oscar nomination ballot before the final deadline at 5 p.m. PT today, January 17.

    Due to the L.A. wildfires tragedy, the voting window has been extended twice. The original deadline was Sunday, January 12, and then was moved to Tuesday, January 14, and finally moved to today. In casual conversations, I have found voters who took advantage of those extensions and still might be waiting to vote before 5 p.m. today or, in all the confusion and concern over the fires, simply have other things on their minds. With other voting groups including BAFTA, PGA, WGA and ASC ultimately announcing their nominations this week, it became apparent that there would be no more Oscar delays.

    The Academy also just released the schedule for the nominations announcement, which will start at 5:30 a.m. PT/8:30 a.m. ET on Thursday and will be split into two parts as usual. Originally planned with a live audience at Academy headquarters, it now will be done virtually.

    RELATED: Where To Watch 30 Of The Oscar Contenders, From ‘Emilia Pérez’ To ‘Conclave’

    The 97th Oscars nominations in all 23 categories will be announced from the Academy’s Samuel Goldwyn Theater via global livestream on Oscar.com, Oscars.org and the Academy’s digital platforms, along with national broadcast news programs including ABC’s Good Morning America and streaming on ABC News Live, Disney+ and Hulu.

    Here is the schedule of announcements for Thursday:

    5:30 a.m. PST
    (Not listed in order of presentation and subject to change)

    Actor in a Supporting Role 
    Actress in a Supporting Role 
    Animated Short Film 
    Costume Design 
    Live Action Short Film
    Makeup and Hairstyling 
    Music (Original Score) 
    Writing (Adapted Screenplay)
    Writing (Original Screenplay)

    5:41 a.m. PST
    (Not listed in order of presentation and subject to change)

    Actor in a Leading Role 
    Actress in a Leading Role 
    Animated Feature Film 
    Cinematography 
    Directing 
    Documentary Feature Film 
    Documentary Short Film 
    Film Editing
    International Feature Film 
    Music (Original Song) 
    Best Picture
    Production Design 
    Sound
    Visual Effects

    Now, if you want to make your voice heard, be sure to vote by 5 p.m. PT today!



    Attention all voters: Ballots are due today at 5pm PT! Make sure to drop off your completed ballot at a designated drop-off location or mail it in before the deadline. Your vote matters, so don’t miss this important opportunity to have your voice heard. Let’s make sure every vote counts in this election! #ElectionDay #GetOutTheVote #YourVoteYourVoice

    Tags:

    1. Deadline for ballots
    2. Voting deadline
    3. Ballots submission
    4. Voting cut-off time
    5. Ballots due by 5pm PT
    6. Last chance to submit ballots
    7. Voting deadline today
    8. Final call for ballots
    9. Submit ballots by 5pm PT
    10. Reminder: Ballots due at 5pm PT

    #Ballots #due #today #5pm

  • NBA All-Star voting 2025: What fans got right and wrong on early ballots

    NBA All-Star voting 2025: What fans got right and wrong on early ballots


    There are always more deserving players for the NBA All-Star Game than there are spots on the team. As the league changes to a bizarre new All-Star format this season, the voting for the starters remains the same. Three front-court players and two backcourt players will be chosen from each conference, with the fan vote making up 50 percent of the final tally, and the player vote and media vote making up the other 25 percent each.

    The first round of fan voting has been released for the 2025 NBA All-Star Game, and there are already some big hits and misses. The league will release two more updates this month before the starters are revealed on Thursday, Jan. 23. The All-Star reserves will be announced on Jan. 30. Read our take the new NBA All-Star format here.

    The 2025 NBA All-Star Game will take place on Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at the Chase Center, home of the Golden State Warriors. Here’s a first look at 2025 NBA All-Star voting, with a breakdown of what the fans got right and wrong.

    2025 NBA All-Star Game early voting results
    via Shams Charnia

    What fans got right in 2025 NBA All-Star Game voting so far

    • The Eastern Conference front-court is perfect: Lock it in right now: Giannis Antetokounmpo, Jayson Tatum, and Karl-Anthony Towns should all be starters in the Eastern Conference. Antetokounmpo is a serious MVP candidate right now, and you can make a case that he’s having the best year of his career after carrying the Bucks to the NBA Cup title. Tatum has been fantastic again for the Celtics, and is on his way to being named First-Team All-NBA for the fourth straight seasons. KAT has been as good as the Knicks could have hoped after swinging a bold trade for him just before the season started. The big man is averaging 25 points per game on stunning 66.2 percent true shooting while also leading the league in rebounding percentage. Other names need not apply, because this should be the East front-court.
    • Shai Gilgeous-Alexander is lapping the field for backcourt votes: The best guard in the NBA resides in Oklahoma City. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander is currently in a too-close-to-call MVP race with Nikola Jokic, and he’s been carrying the Thunder to the top of the West after a significant hip injury to his top teammate, Chet Holmgren. SGA pops off for 30+ points seemingly every night with the league’s most unstoppable mid-range scoring package. It would have been understandable if Stephen Curry jumped him in voting with the game taking place at his home arena, but the fans did well to recognize Gilgeous-Alexander’s greatness.
    • Donovan Mitchell deserves to be rewarded for the Cavs’ amazing start: The Cleveland Cavaliers have been the best team in the NBA to start the year with a 29-4 record to begin the season. Part of the reason the Cavs are so good is because they don’t need Mitchell to carry such a heavy load this year thanks to the development of their other players. The star guard is averaging his fewest field goal attempts and points per game since his rookie year, but he’s still been outstanding in his opportunities. The Cavs could get as many as three All-Stars (and Jarrett Allen will probably help headline snub lists), but they deserve to have a starter, and Mitchell remains the obvious pick even with a downtick in usage.

    What fans got wrong in 2025 NBA All-Star Game voting so far

    • C’mon, LaMelo Ball should not be the East backcourt leading vote-getter: I’m as big of a LaMelo Ball guy as they come. I ranked him as the top prospect in the 2020 NBA Draft, and have been encouraged by his development ever since. Ball is having a fantastic year as one four players currently averaging more than 30 points per game, but he’s once again had trouble staying healthy and impacting winning. Charlotte’s record in games Ball has appeared in is only 6-16. He shouldn’t be starting ahead of Jalen Brunson in the East backcourt. Speaking of the East backcourt …
    • How did Darius Garland miss the top-10 of East backcourt voting? Garland has been sensational for Cleveland this year, and his return to stardom after a broken jaw last season is a major reason the Cavs have been so good thus far. I had to double-check this list to make sure I correctly read that Jordan Poole is in the top-10 of East backcourt voting, but Garland isn’t. Averaging 20.5 points and 6.7 assists per game while shooting 42.7 percent from three, Garland has a legit case to start for the East. He’s become one of the most underrated players in the league.
    • Victor Wembanyama should be starting this game for the West: It’s hard to get too mad at the fans for wanting to see LeBron James and Kevin Durant, though. Wemby has been better than both by establishing himself as the best defender in the league before he’s old enough to walk into a bar. He’s a clear All-NBA candidate this year, and he’s going to give the Spurs a chance to make the playoffs. Wemby is going to a long run of MVP contention coming up, and we don’t know how many more times we’ll see LeBron and KD in the All-Star Game. The young Spurs star should be a starter, but I’m not too mad about it. While we’re at it, someone please get Jaren Jackson Jr. a few more votes, because he’s been phenomenal for the Grizzlies this year.



    The NBA All-Star voting for 2025 is in full swing, and fans have already cast their early ballots for their favorite players. As always, there are some surprises and some snubs in the voting results. Let’s take a look at what fans got right and wrong on the early ballots.

    One of the biggest surprises on the early ballots is the inclusion of several young up-and-coming players who have been putting up impressive numbers this season. Players like Zion Williamson, Luka Doncic, and LaMelo Ball have all received a significant number of votes, showing that fans are recognizing the talent and potential of these rising stars.

    However, there are also some notable snubs in the early voting results. Some established veterans who have been playing at a high level this season, such as LeBron James and Kevin Durant, have not received as many votes as expected. It seems that fans may be more focused on the new and exciting players in the league, rather than the proven stars.

    Overall, the early NBA All-Star voting for 2025 has been a mix of surprises and disappointments. It will be interesting to see how the final rosters shape up as the voting continues and the coaches make their selections. Who do you think deserves a spot in the All-Star game this year? Let us know in the comments below.

    Tags:

    NBA All-Star voting 2025, NBA All-Star ballots, NBA All-Star fan voting, NBA All-Star selections, NBA All-Star starters, NBA All-Star snubs, NBA All-Star predictions, NBA All-Star analysis, NBA All-Star roster, NBA All-Star voting trends, NBA All-Star voting results

    #NBA #AllStar #voting #fans #wrong #early #ballots

  • Broken Ballots: Will Your Vote Count? (Center for the Study of Language and Information)

    Broken Ballots: Will Your Vote Count? (Center for the Study of Language and Information)


    Price: $30.00
    (as of Nov 20,2024 12:43:57 UTC – Details)




    Publisher ‏ : ‎ Center for the Study of Language and Information; Illustrated edition (June 1, 2012)
    Language ‏ : ‎ English
    Paperback ‏ : ‎ 420 pages
    ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 1575866366
    ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1575866369
    Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.31 pounds
    Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6 x 1.1 x 9 inches

    Customers say

    Customers find the book provides great information, historical and technical content, and answers many questions. They describe it as interesting, insightful, and enjoyable. Readers also mention the pacing is good and the book was crafted with care.

    AI-generated from the text of customer reviews


    Broken Ballots: Will Your Vote Count?

    In the upcoming election, many Americans are concerned about the integrity of our voting process. The Center for the Study of Language and Information has been researching the issue of broken ballots and how they can impact the outcome of an election.

    Broken ballots are ballots that are marked incorrectly or not filled out properly, leading to potential errors in tabulation. This can happen for a variety of reasons, such as confusing ballot designs, outdated voting machines, or human error.

    So, the question remains: will your vote count? With broken ballots potentially skewing the results, it’s more important than ever to ensure that your vote is cast correctly. Make sure to carefully follow all instructions on your ballot, double-check your selections, and ask for help if you’re unsure about anything.

    The Center for the Study of Language and Information is working to raise awareness about the issue of broken ballots and advocating for improved voting processes to ensure that every vote is counted accurately. Stay informed, stay vigilant, and make your voice heard in this upcoming election. Your vote matters.
    #Broken #Ballots #Vote #Count #Center #Study #Language #Information