Tag: Banned

  • Unlocking the Winning Formula: The Close Bond Between a Banned Coach and a Wimbledon Champion

    Unlocking the Winning Formula: The Close Bond Between a Banned Coach and a Wimbledon Champion



    Uncovering the Intriguing Bond: The ‘Relationship of Dependence’ Between a Barred Coach and a Wimbledon Champion

    Embarking on a journey through the world of tennis, we dive deep into the captivating tale of the unique connection between a barred coach and a Wimbledon champion. This dynamic duo defies the odds and showcases the power of resilience, determination, and unwavering trust.

    Join us as we unravel the secrets behind this extraordinary bond and explore the intricate web of dependence that fuels their success on and off the court. From grueling training sessions to nail-biting matches, this partnership transcends the realm of traditional coaching and delves into the realm of true friendship and mutual respect.

    Discover the unparalleled synergy between these two individuals as they navigate the highs and lows of the competitive tennis world, proving that when talent meets dedication, anything is possible. Get ready to be inspired, intrigued, and ultimately moved by the profound connection that lies at the heart of this remarkable story.



    In the world of professional tennis, the relationship between a coach and a player is often a crucial component of success. One such example of this is the unique bond between a barred coach and a Wimbledon champion.

    For many years, this coach had been banned from official tournaments due to a controversial incident that had tarnished his reputation. However, his expertise and deep understanding of the game caught the attention of a young and promising tennis player who was determined to make it to the top.

    Despite the coach’s past transgressions, the Wimbledon champion saw something special in him and believed that he could help her reach her full potential. And so, a partnership was formed, built on trust, dedication, and a shared passion for the sport.

    Over the years, the relationship between the coach and the player grew stronger, as they worked tirelessly together to hone her skills, improve her technique, and strategize for each match. The coach’s wisdom and experience proved invaluable, while the player’s talent and determination shone through on the court.

    Together, they defied the odds and overcame countless obstacles, culminating in a historic Wimbledon victory that solidified their legacy in the world of tennis. The bond between them transcended the traditional coach-player dynamic, evolving into a true partnership based on mutual respect and admiration.

    Despite their unconventional beginnings, the barred coach and the Wimbledon champion proved that with hard work, dedication, and a strong support system, anything is possible in the world of tennis. Their story serves as a reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected relationships can lead to the greatest success.

    Tags:

    1. Barred coach
    2. Wimbledon champion
    3. Relationship of dependence
    4. Tennis coaching dynamics
    5. Player-coach bond
    6. Professional tennis relationships
    7. Player development strategies
    8. Coaching success stories
    9. Tennis mentorship
    10. Barred coach controversy

    #relationship #dependence #barred #coach #Wimbledon #champion

  • OnlyFans Model Lily Phillips Says Airbnb Banned Her After Sex Stunt


    OnlyFans Model Lily Phillips Says Airbnb Banned Her After Sex Stunt

    Lily Phillips
    Courtesy of Lillian Phillips/Instagram

    OnlyFans model Lily Phillips is facing some consequences after sleeping with 101 men in one day.

    “Yah, I’m banned off Airbnb,” Phillips, 23, claimed on the Wednesday, January 22, episode of the “Plug Talk” podcast. “It was really scary because they could f—ing sue me, but fingers crossed.”

    Phillips previously rented a two-bedroom Airbnb in London to sleep with 101 men in 24 hours. The challenge became the subject of a YouTube documentary titled I Slept With 100 Men in One Day.

    “If they sue me,” Phillips said, “I’ll just buy it off them and make it, like, a tourist attraction.” Us Weekly has reached out to Airbnb for comment.

    The OnlyFans model previously expressed her future plans to sleep with 1,000 men in one day. While she had originally planned to film it in America this month, she has since pushed the date back.

    “I was meant to do it here,” she told podcast cohosts Adam 22 and Lena the Plug at their studios near Hollywood. “But I got a lot of advice that you will be deported if you do it here.”

    Phillips’ OnlyFans career began while she was studying at a university. After she began “sleeping around” while in school, Phillips said she realized she could turn her activities into a profitable career.

    Since the release of her documentary, Phillips said business has been improving even more.

    OnlyFans Model Lily Phillips Says Airbnb Banned Her After Sex Stunt 2

    Lily Phillips
    Robert F. Smith/Getty Images for Webstar Marketing Group, Inc

    “Last month, I probably did about 10 times as much as I had done the month before maybe,” she said. “I feel like at some point it will maybe start to come down. …There will be peaks and dips.”

    One thing that appears to be consistent is the support from Phillips’ parents.

    While the OnlyFans model said her mom and dad are “not cheering me on going, ‘Suck off [a] thousand cocks,’ they still love me.”

    OnlyFans' Lily Phillips Has a Relatable Daily Routine Ahead of Goal to Sleep With 1000 Men in a Day


    Related: Inside OnlyFans Influencer Lily Phillips’ Super Relatable Daily Routine

    While influencer Lily Phillips has lofty ambitions to sleep with 1,000 men in one day, the rest of her daily routine sounds completely relatable to Us. “A day in the life of an online sozzer,” Phillips, 23, said in a Sunday, December 15, TikTok video, while lying in bed. Phillips continued vlogging after waking up, […]

    “Their love for me is still 100 percent there,” she continued. “It’s just been a little bit tough because they’ve gotten so much backlash. As much as I don’t care about what people say about me and s— like that, it’s when they come for your family. It’s not nice to hear.”

    When asked about dating, Phillips said she’s not interested right now. Instead, she assured listeners that she’s “quite work driven” and too distracted to be in a serious relationship.

    As she explained, “It only needs to make sense to me and not anyone else.”



    In a shocking turn of events, OnlyFans model Lily Phillips has revealed that Airbnb banned her after a controversial sex stunt. Phillips, who has gained a large following on the adult content platform, shared the news on her social media accounts.

    The model reportedly booked an Airbnb for a photoshoot and decided to spice things up by filming an explicit video in the rental property. Phillips claims that she was careful to follow Airbnb’s rules and regulations, but the company still decided to ban her after finding out about the stunt.

    In a statement, Airbnb said, “We have a zero-tolerance policy for inappropriate behavior and have taken action to remove this guest from our platform. We expect all users to respect our community guidelines and will not hesitate to take action against those who violate them.”

    Phillips has since apologized for her actions and expressed her disappointment in being banned from the platform. She has vowed to be more careful in the future and hopes to continue growing her career as an OnlyFans model.

    The incident serves as a reminder to all content creators to be mindful of the platforms they use and to always adhere to the rules and regulations set forth by those platforms. It also highlights the importance of respecting the boundaries of others, especially when using shared spaces like Airbnb rentals.

    Tags:

    OnlyFans, Lily Phillips, Airbnb, banned, sex stunt, influencer, social media, controversy, internet sensation, adult content, viral news

    #OnlyFans #Model #Lily #Phillips #Airbnb #Banned #Sex #Stunt

  • “They Should Be Banned From Using It” Celebrities Slam Diabetics For Ozempic Shortage – Waterford Whispers News


    PEOPLE taking Ozempic to treat diabetes have been labelled ‘selfish’ with no regard for the wealthy after huge shortages of the weight loss drug were announced forcing many celebrities to speak out against improper use.

    An outright ban on diabetics receiving the drug is now being called by some major eye-sunken Hollywood stars who look like shadows of their former selves.

    “Have these people no shame? Why don’t they just fuck off and die?” asked British television personality, music manager and author Sharon Osborne.

    With reports that supplies of Ozempic are still getting into the hands of diabetics via the black market, stars like Khloe Kardashian and Elon Musk are calling for huge fines to be implemented on those selling the drug to people who don’t need it for cosmetic reasons.

    “What are we supposed to do? Eat healthy, do more exercise? No one’s got time for that!” Khloe Kardashian told her vast social media following yesterday in a heart wrenching before and after image post of her weighing scales depicting her weight gain from 59 kilos to 62 in just a matter of months, adding, “selfish diabetics have no idea the damage they’re causing people who actually need the drug to look good.”

    Meanwhile, the tabloid media has denied glorifying the drug for use in treating diabetes and has vowed to focus more on emphasising the importance of getting it to those who need it.

    We design & sell funny t-shirts, mugs, hoodies and more to help keep the lights on. Check them out here www.waterfordwhispers.shop



    Diabetes is a serious medical condition that affects millions of people around the world. For those who require medication to manage their diabetes, such as Ozempic, the recent shortage of the drug has been causing major concerns. However, instead of showing empathy and understanding towards those affected, some celebrities have decided to slam diabetics for the shortage.

    In a recent interview, several high-profile celebrities were quoted as saying that diabetics should be banned from using Ozempic because they are causing the shortage for everyone else. One celebrity even went so far as to say that diabetics should just “suck it up” and find an alternative medication.

    This kind of attitude towards individuals struggling with a serious health condition is not only insensitive but also harmful. Diabetes is a chronic illness that requires constant management and monitoring, and medication shortages can have serious consequences for those affected.

    Instead of blaming diabetics for the shortage of Ozempic, we should be focusing on finding solutions to ensure that everyone who needs the medication has access to it. It’s time for these celebrities to educate themselves on the realities of living with diabetes and show some compassion towards those who are struggling.

    Tags:

    • Ozempic shortage
    • Diabetics slammed
    • Celebrities criticize
    • Waterford Whispers News
    • Diabetes medication shortage
    • Ozempic controversy
    • Healthcare crisis
    • Celebrity backlash
    • Diabetic community outrage

    #Banned #Celebrities #Slam #Diabetics #Ozempic #Shortage #Waterford #Whispers #News

  • Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 Reportedly Banned In Saudi Arabia Due To Unskippable LGBTQ Scene


    Saudi Arabian outlet VGA4A has reported that Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 has been banned in the region due to an unstoppable LGBTQ sequence.

    This isn’t the first time that the country has banned a video game for its inclusion of LGBTQ content. The Last of Us Part II was refused release in Saudi Arabia due to it featuring a same-sex relationship, as well as its inclusion of a trans character.

    Related Content — Upcoming PS5 Games 2025: The Best PS5 Games Coming Soon

    Right now it is not known what the scene in question is, but we do know that Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 features sex and nudity, so there’s no reason why this won’t also feature LGBTQ content. However, right now an official statement from developer Warhorse Studios hasn’t been made yet, so keep that in mind.

    Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 is slated for release on PS5, PC, and Xbox Series X/S on February 11, 2025. Earlier this week, Warhorse Studios’ Daniel Vavra claimed that the game’s script is the longest ever in a video game, including current record holder Baldur’s Gate III.

    [Source – Insider Gaming]



    Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 Reportedly Banned In Saudi Arabia Due To Unskippable LGBTQ Scene

    Reports have surfaced that the highly anticipated sequel to Kingdom Come Deliverance has been banned in Saudi Arabia due to a controversial unskippable LGBTQ scene. The scene in question reportedly depicts a romantic relationship between two male characters, sparking outrage among conservative groups in the country.

    The ban comes as a disappointment to many fans of the popular RPG series, as Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 was highly anticipated and expected to be a major hit upon its release. The decision to ban the game has sparked debate among gamers and activists, with some arguing that censorship of LGBTQ content is a violation of free speech and artistic expression.

    Despite the ban in Saudi Arabia, Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 is still set to be released in other countries around the world. It remains to be seen whether other countries will follow suit and ban the game due to its LGBTQ content.

    Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    Kingdom Come Deliverance 2, Saudi Arabia, LGBTQ scene, banned game, censorship, video game controversy, LGBTQ representation, gaming news, Saudi Arabia censorship, LGBTQ rights

    #Kingdom #Deliverance #Reportedly #Banned #Saudi #Arabia #Due #Unskippable #LGBTQ #Scene

  • The shockingly common items barred from cruise ships — that could get you banned for life


    Don’t rock the boat — you should avoid bringing these items on your next cruise, an expert warns.

    Gary Bembridge, an avid travel and cruise extraordinaire, revealed the common items that are barred from popular liners.

    The first, he explained, are surge protectors, extension cords or “anything allowing multiple plugs.”

    Before boarding the boat, cruise liner guests should ensure they don’t pack any restricted items that could be confiscated — or worse, get them booted. nikolas_jkd – stock.adobe.com

    Before boarding the boat, cruise liner guests should ensure they don’t pack any restricted items that could be confiscated — or worse, get them booted. nikolas_jkd – stock.adobe.com

    “All cruise lines ban any extension cord with a surge protector feature,” he said, per The Mirror, adding that the cables are a fire hazard.

    Bluetooth speakers are also not allowed on certain cruises, like Carnival ships.

    “They have said that if any passenger tries to bring them on board at embarkation or at a port, they’ll be confiscated, and if cruisers buy a Bluetooth speaker in the on board shops, they will be held until the end of the cruise,” Bembridge explained.

    “I am sure it has really been done as it is annoying and intrusive having people playing loud music at the pools, around the deck, on their balconies and in their cabins,” he noted, adding that he was “devastated” to learn of the restriction because he listens to white noise while sleeping.

    Routers and satellites for internet connectivity are barred from cruise ships, according to Bembridge. Mike Mareen – stock.adobe.com

    Routers and satellites for internet connectivity are barred from cruise ships, according to Bembridge. Mike Mareen – stock.adobe.com

    Power strips could be a fire hazard in guests’ cabins. andrei310 – stock.adobe.com

    Power strips could be a fire hazard in guests’ cabins. andrei310 – stock.adobe.com

    Wi-Fi hotspots, routers and satellite dishes are also barred from boarding the boat — which one guest learned the hard way on a Carnival cruise.

    YouTuber Richard Shillington tried to slink a Starlink mini dish out to sea and it was confiscated, Bembridge said.

    CBD oil is also banned from cruise liners, despite its widespread medicinal use, according to Bembridge, who recalled the time one Carnival cruise guest was “denied boarding with no refund” after CBD gummies were discovered in their luggage. Not to mention, she was banned for life.

    According to Carnival Cruise Line’s list of restricted items, drugs, ammunition, explosives, fireworks, flammable substances, hard liquor and sharp items like knives, scissors and open razors are among the banned belongings.

    Bembridge urged travelers to double check their suitcases before embarking on a cruise. Yellow Boat – stock.adobe.com

    Bembridge urged travelers to double check their suitcases before embarking on a cruise. Yellow Boat – stock.adobe.com

    One of the most unusual items that is barred from the boat are paper pineapples, which are used to denote that the couples occupying their suite are open to swingers.

    “I’ve never quite understood the hit-and-miss nature of advertising using that on regular cruises, when there are entire ship charters dedicated to swingers run by groups like such as Bliss Cruises which seems a surer thing,” Bembridge said.



    Cruise ships are a popular vacation option for many people, offering a luxurious escape to exotic destinations. However, there are some items that are surprisingly common but are actually barred from being brought on board. Here are some items that could get you banned for life from a cruise ship:

    1. Weapons: This may seem obvious, but many people still try to bring firearms, knives, or other weapons on board. Cruise ships have strict security measures in place to ensure the safety of all passengers and crew members.

    2. Illegal drugs: Bringing illegal drugs on board a cruise ship is not only dangerous but also against the law. If you are caught with drugs, you could face serious consequences, including being banned from all future cruises.

    3. Flammable liquids: Items like lighter fluid, gasoline, and other flammable liquids are not allowed on cruise ships due to the potential fire hazard they pose. If you are caught with these items, you could be banned from cruising for life.

    4. Drones: While drones can capture stunning aerial footage of your cruise, they are not allowed on board due to safety and privacy concerns. Using a drone on a cruise ship could get you banned from future cruises.

    5. Animals: Bringing pets or other animals on a cruise ship is not allowed, as it can disrupt the experience for other passengers and pose health risks. If you are caught with an animal on board, you could be banned for life.

    6. Large amounts of alcohol: While most cruise ships allow passengers to bring a limited amount of alcohol on board, bringing excessive amounts could get you banned. Cruise lines have strict policies on alcohol consumption and bringing large quantities on board is a red flag.

    It’s important to familiarize yourself with the cruise line’s policies and rules before embarking on your vacation. By avoiding these common items, you can ensure a smooth and enjoyable cruise experience without the risk of being banned for life.

    Tags:

    1. Cruise ship banned items
    2. Prohibited items on cruise ships
    3. Cruise ship security regulations
    4. Items that can get you banned from cruises
    5. Cruise ship contraband
    6. Cruise ship banned substances
    7. Cruise ship prohibited items list
    8. Cruise ship banned items you didn’t know about
    9. Cruise ship banned items and consequences
    10. Cruise ship banned items and safety measures

    #shockingly #common #items #barred #cruise #ships #banned #life

  • Carnival Cruise Line Prohibits These Common Items. Taking Them Onboard Could Get You Banned for Life


    Carnival Cruise Line and others like it have policies involving common items that customers cannot take on cruise ships. The cruise line’s policy states that customers who bring these common items onboard could find themselves banned for life from the ships. Let’s take a look at what we know about these guidelines.

    Carnival Cruise Line Bans These Items

    In a recent interview with the New York Post, travel and cruise expert Gary Bembridge disclosed the typical goods prohibited by well-known cruise lines like Carnival.

    He shared that the first items are extension cords, surge protectors, or “anything allowing multiple plugs.”

    “All cruise lines ban any extension cord with a surge protector feature,” he said, noting that cables are considered a fire hazard.

    Additionally, several cruises, such as Carnival Cruise Line, do not permit Bluetooth speakers.

    “They have said that if any passenger tries to bring them on board at embarkation or at a port, they’ll be confiscated, and if cruisers buy a Bluetooth speaker in the on board shops, they will be held until the end of the cruise,” Bembridge explained. “I am sure it has really been done as it is annoying and intrusive having people playing loud music at the pools, around the deck, on their balconies and in their cabins.”

    Satellite dishes, routers, and Wi-Fi hotspots are also prohibited from entering the ship. One visitor, YouTuber Richard Shillington, discovered this the hard way on a Carnival cruise when his belongings were seized after he attempted to bring a Starlink mini dish onboard.

    Despite being widely used for therapeutic purposes, CBD oil is also prohibited on cruise ships, according to Bembridge, who recounted how a Carnival cruise passenger was “denied boarding with no refund” after CBD candies were found in her luggage. In addition, she received a lifetime ban.

    Carnival Cruise Line’s list of prohibited items also includes flammable materials, hard liquor, explosives, fireworks, drugs, ammunition, and sharp objects like knives, scissors, and open razors. Paper pineapples, meant to indicate that couples in suites are open to swingers, are among the most bizarre artifacts prohibited from the boat.

    Controversial Changes for the Cruise Line

    Carnival Cruise Line has made controversial changes to its policies recently, most recently regarding hand sanitizer, which is no longer widely available on board.

    “It is hand sanitizer that has been removed from many of the places at the request and recommendation of the medical professionals. Hand sanitizer is not a deterrent against Gastro illness,” longtime brand ambassador John Heald wrote on Facebook. “To prevent that and other surface-borne illnesses, we recommend washing hands with warm water and soap. That’s why this is promoted. That’s why we do have handwashing stations. And we are very, very glad to say that at the time of my writing this, we’ve not had any outbreaks for many, many years.”

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) advises against hand sanitizer and proposes hand-washing facilities instead. “Cleaning hands at key times with soap and water or hand sanitizer that contains at least 60% alcohol is one of the most important steps you can take to avoid getting sick and spreading germs to those around you,” the agency reported.

    What’s more, Carnival Cruise Line recently announced that AARP members will no longer be eligible for discounted gift cards. After lowering the price of the Carnival gift card twice in less than a month, AARP revealed that the cruise line had stopped selling the cards through them.

    “Carnival Cruise Line has decided to discontinue offering their gift cards through the AARP Rewards Program,” read the AARP website at the time of the announcement. “We understand that this may be disappointing news, and we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. We remain committed to providing you with valuable rewards and appreciate your understanding.”



    Carnival Cruise Line Prohibits These Common Items. Taking Them Onboard Could Get You Banned for Life

    When packing for your upcoming Carnival cruise, make sure to double-check your luggage for any prohibited items. Carnival Cruise Line has strict guidelines in place to ensure the safety and well-being of all passengers and crew members. Violating these rules could result in serious consequences, including being banned from all future Carnival cruises.

    Here are some common items that are prohibited onboard Carnival cruises:

    1. Weapons: Firearms, knives, and other weapons are strictly prohibited onboard Carnival cruises. Bringing any type of weapon onboard could result in immediate removal from the ship and a lifetime ban.

    2. Illegal drugs: Possession or use of illegal drugs is strictly prohibited onboard Carnival cruises. Passengers found with illegal substances will be disembarked at the next port and could face legal consequences.

    3. Alcohol: Bringing your own alcohol onboard is not allowed on Carnival cruises. Alcohol purchased onboard or at ports of call will be held until the end of the cruise.

    4. Drones: Drones are not allowed onboard Carnival cruises due to safety and privacy concerns. Using a drone onboard could result in removal from the ship.

    5. Hoverboards and other self-balancing scooters: Due to fire safety concerns, hoverboards and similar devices are prohibited onboard Carnival cruises.

    6. Candles and incense: Open flames are not allowed onboard Carnival cruises for safety reasons. Passengers found using candles or incense could face consequences.

    7. Pets: With the exception of service animals, pets are not allowed onboard Carnival cruises. Bringing a pet onboard could result in removal from the ship.

    Before you embark on your Carnival cruise, make sure to review the full list of prohibited items on the Carnival website. By following the rules and regulations set forth by Carnival Cruise Line, you can ensure a safe and enjoyable vacation for yourself and your fellow passengers.

    Tags:

    Carnival Cruise Line, prohibited items, banned for life, cruise ship rules, cruise ship regulations, prohibited items on cruise ships, Carnival Cruise Line banned items, cruise ship safety, cruise ship restrictions, banned items on Carnival Cruise Line

    #Carnival #Cruise #Line #Prohibits #Common #Items #Onboard #Banned #Life

  • Why is TikTok getting banned? What’s behind the law that could shutter the app


    Washington — The 170 million TikTok users in the U.S. could be in for a rude awakening come Sunday if they suddenly find the enormously popular video-sharing app is inaccessible because of a law passed by a bipartisan majority in Congress last year.

    Lawmakers and U.S. officials have sounded the alarm for years about the supposed risks that TikTok’s ties to China pose to national security, and Congress moved last year to force TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to sell its stake in the app or be cut off from the U.S. market. The law gave the company a deadline of Jan. 19 — one day before a new president would take office.

    That deadline is now here, with no sign of a sale in sight. TikTok’s last-ditch legal challenge failed on Friday, when the Supreme Court said the law does not violate the First Amendment. 

    The Biden White House said it will leave enforcement of the law to the incoming Trump administration, and President-elect Donald Trump has vowed to “save” the app. On Saturday, Trump told NBC News he was considering an option to extend the deadline for the law to go into effect. 

    “The 90-day extension is something that will be most likely done, because it’s appropriate,” he said in the phone interview, adding, “if I decide to do that, I’ll probably announce it on Monday.”

    The law allows the president, under some circumstances, to grant a one-time extension of up to 90 days regarding the date when the law goes into effect.

    But TikTok has hinted that it could still take itself offline once the law is in effect, a move that would leave content creators and users in the lurch as the company seeks a way to get back on firm legal footing. 

    In a statement provided to CBS News Friday evening, TikTok said that “the statements issued today by both the Biden White House and the Department of Justice have failed to provide the necessary clarity and assurance to the service providers that are integral to maintaining TikTok’s availability to over 170 million Americans. Unless the Biden Administration immediately provides a definitive statement to satisfy the most critical service providers assuring non-enforcement, unfortunately TikTok will be forced to go dark on January 19.”

    White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre on Saturday called TikTok’s latest statement “a stunt.”

    “We have seen the most recent statement from TikTok,” Jean-Pierre said in her own statement. “It is a stunt, and we see no reason for TikTok or other companies to take actions in the next few days before the Trump Administration takes office on Monday. We have laid out our position clearly and straightforwardly: actions to implement this law will fall to the next administration. So TikTok and other companies should take up any concerns with them.”

    Here’s what to know about the TikTok ban and how we got here:

    Why did Congress want to ban TikTok? 

    U.S. officials have repeatedly warned that TikTok threatens national security because the Chinese government could use it as a vehicle to spy on Americans or covertly influence the U.S. public by amplifying or suppressing certain content. 

    The concern is warranted, they said, because Chinese national security laws require organizations to cooperate with intelligence gathering. FBI Director Christopher Wray told House Intelligence Committee members last year that the Chinese government could compromise Americans’ devices through the software. 

    As the House took up the divest-or-ban law in April 2024, Rep. Michael McCaul, a Texas Republican, compared it to a “spy balloon in Americans’ phones.” Sen. Chris Coons, a Democrat from Delaware, said that lawmakers learned in classified briefings “how rivers of data are being collected and shared in ways that are not well-aligned with American security interests.” 

    “Why is it a security threat?” Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri said Friday. “If you have TikTok on your phone currently, it can track your whereabouts, it can read your text messages, it can track your keystrokes. It has access to your phone records.” 

    If the Chinese government gets its hands on that information, “it’s not just a national security threat, it’s a personal security threat,” Hawley said. 

    In 2022, TikTok began an initiative known as “Project Texas” to safeguard American users’ data on servers in the U.S. and ease lawmakers’ fears. The Justice Department said the plan was insufficient because it still allowed some U.S. data to flow to China. 

    Though the divest-or-ban law passed with bipartisan support, some lawmakers have been critical of the measure, agreeing with TikTok that it infringes on Americans’ free speech rights. 

    “Most of the reasons the government banned it were based on accusations, not proof,” Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky said Friday. “[TikTok has] never been tried and found guilty of sharing information with the communist government.” 

    Others have changed their tune as the deadline for a ban neared, including Trump, who tried to ban the app with an executive order during his first term that was struck down in the courts. 

    “The irony in all of this is that Donald Trump was the first one to point out there’s a problem,” Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Thursday. Warner said the Trump administration “did a great job of convincing me and overwhelming members of Congress” about the risks. 

    TikTok has its day at the Supreme Court 

    During arguments before the Supreme Court on Jan. 10, TikTok’s lawyer did not deny the potential national security risks as the justices appeared critical of the company’s legal challenge.

    “I think Congress and the president were concerned that China was accessing information about millions of Americans, tens of millions of Americans, including teenagers, people in their 20s, that they would use that information over time to develop spies, to turn people, to blackmail people, people who a generation from now will be working in the FBI or the CIA or in the State Department,” Justice Brett Kavanaugh said. “Is that not a realistic assessment by Congress and the president of the risks here?” 

    Noel Francisco, who represented TikTok, responded, “I’m not disputing the risks. I’m disputing the means that they have chosen.” 

    Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar asserted that TikTok collects “unprecedented amounts” of personal data that would be “incredibly valuable” to the Chinese government by giving it “a powerful tool for harassment, recruitment and espionage.” 

    “For years, the Chinese government has sought to build detailed profiles about Americans, where we live and work, who our friends and coworkers are what our interests are and what our vices are,” she said, citing major data breaches that the U.S. has attributed to China over the last decade, including the hack of the Office of Personnel Management that compromised the personal information of millions of federal employees.

    The Supreme Court’s TikTok decision

    In defending the law before the Supreme Court, the Justice Department pointed to two main national security justifications: countering China’s collection of data from TikTok’s 170 million U.S. users and its purported ability to manipulate content on the app to further its geopolitical interests.

    The Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling hinged on the first justification: that China, through the app and its parent company, Beijing-based ByteDance, can amass vast amounts of information from American users. The justices found that Congress did not violate the First Amendment by taking action to address that threat. Congress, it said, “had good reason to single out TikTok for special treatment.”

    The court refrained from backing the government’s interest in stopping China’s purported covert manipulation of content, which the Biden administration had cited as a national security justification for the law.

    “One man’s ‘covert content manipulation’ is another’s ‘editorial discretion,’” Gorsuch wrote in an opinion concurring in judgment. “Journalists, publishers, and speakers of all kinds routinely make less-than-transparent judgments about what stories to tell and how to tell them. Without question, the First Amendment has much to say about the right to make those choices.”

    ,

    and

    contributed to this report.



    TikTok, the wildly popular social media platform known for its short-form videos, is facing the threat of being banned in several countries, including the United States. But what’s behind the law that could shutter the app?

    The primary concern surrounding TikTok is its ties to the Chinese government and the potential security risks it poses. The app is owned by the Chinese company ByteDance, which has raised concerns about data privacy and the possibility of user data being shared with the Chinese government.

    In response to these concerns, several countries, including India and the United States, have taken steps to ban or restrict TikTok. In the US, President Donald Trump issued an executive order in August 2020 that would ban TikTok unless it was sold to an American company. The deadline for the sale was extended multiple times, but as of now, TikTok remains in legal limbo.

    While TikTok has taken steps to address these concerns, such as establishing a transparency center and appointing a US-based CEO, the app still faces scrutiny over its data practices. As the debate over TikTok’s future continues, it remains to be seen whether the app will be able to avoid being banned in key markets.

    Tags:

    TikTok ban, TikTok shutdown, US TikTok ban, TikTok law, TikTok app ban, TikTok security concerns, TikTok privacy issues, TikTok government ban, TikTok regulation, TikTok banned in US

    #TikTok #banned #Whats #law #shutter #app

  • Foul-mouthed fan banned from Eagles home games, fired from job after viral tirade against woman


    A Philadelphia sports fan, who went on a misogynistic tirade against a female Green Bay Packers fan in viral video, lost his job and won’t be allowed to ever attend another Eagles home game, officials said Tuesday.

    The ugly scene was captured on cellphone video during the Eagles’ NFC wild-card round victory Sunday night at Lincoln Financial Field in South Philly.

    The “individual will not be permitted to attend any future events at Lincoln Financial Field,” a source familiar with the matter said Tuesday.

    The widely shared video showed a man in an Eagles jacket bending over, cusping his hands over his mouth and verbally abusing the female fan in the row in front of him. That fan did not appear to respond to him.

    Online sleuths connected the offending fan to a New Jersey management consulting firm, BCT Partners, that denounced its employee’s behavior.

    And by late Tuesday night, the company said it had parted with the employee it identified as Ryan Caldwell, a business analyst with a speciality in information technology.

    “The language was vile, it was disgusting, it was unacceptable and horrific,” BCT Partners founder Randal Pinkett told NBC News on Wednesday.

    “It was diametrically opposed to the values that we espouse at BCT. We’re a company that’s founded on inclusion, on respect, on dignity and the behavior was just in complete contrary to everything that we stand for at this organization.”

    Pinkett, who reality TV fans might remember as the Season 4 winner of “The Apprentice,” declined to discuss Caldwell’s work performance.

    But Pinkett wished his now-former employee well and hopes he can pick up the pieces from Sunday night’s incident.

    “It’s not just that we have parted ways with Mr. Caldwell, but we were very clear in our statement that we extended grace and support to him, that he could be better,” Pinkett said.

    “What troubles me is his behavior, but what also troubles me is the cancel culture that we live in, that doesn’t afford people grace that we don’t have the opportunity to be better people and learn from our mistakes.”

    In a statement to NBC News on Wednesday, Caldwell apologized for his behavior.

    “While attending an NFL game last Sunday to support my beloved Philadelphia Eagles, an incident occurred that I deeply regret. What began as banter with two Packers fans sitting near me escalated to something more serious, and I said things that were unacceptable,” according to his statement.

    “In the heat of the moment, I chose unforgiving words to address one of the fans, Ms. Ally Keller. I want to sincerely apologize to Ms. Keller for those words, and to my wife, family, and friends, my former employer and colleagues, Packer fans, Eagle fans, the Philadelphia Eagles, the City of Philadelphia, and all who were offended.”

    The Eagles won the game 22-10, advancing to play the Los Angeles Rams on Sunday afternoon.

    The fan targeted by Caldwell’s rants, Ally Keller, and her fiancé, Alex Basara, told NBC Philadelphia they were initially having a good time at the game, even enjoying friendly banter with rival fans.

    “He started out with playful jabs at first or kind of just saying things to us right when we sat down,” Basara told NBC Philadelphia. “I chatted with him for a bit. But then he just kept saying some of the same things. Continued through the entire game. It got worse and worse as the game went on. We were surrounded by Eagles fans. We were getting all the attention.”

    The man’s comments became nastier as the Eagles’ lead grew, the couple said.

    “And then he just said, ‘Actually, you’re not even good-looking enough to be talking to me,’” Keller said. “And then I said, you know, ‘What does that mean?’ And he said, ‘You know what that means.’ And so I said, ‘Have you looked in the mirror yourself?’ And he said, ‘Yeah, but I’m a man. I’m allowed to be ugly. You’re a woman.’”

    Basara said recording the incident is what ended up de-escalating it.

    Keller said she was hesitant to say too much to the home team’s fan because the atmosphere was hostile.

    “If it did turn into an altercation or something physical, all they see is me messing with an Eagles fan, and then I become the target,” she said. “And then what happens with my fiancé at that time in that scenario? It’s a dangerous situation.”

    Philadelphia fans, and Eagles supporters in particular, have long had a rough reputation they believe is overblown.

    At one point in the late 1990s and the early 2000s, an arraignment court was established in the basement of the team’s former home at Veterans Stadium to deal with fans apprehended for drunkenness, fighting and more on Sundays in the fall.



    In a shocking turn of events, a foul-mouthed Eagles fan has been banned from attending home games and fired from his job after a disturbing and viral tirade against a woman at a recent game.

    The incident, which was captured on video and quickly spread across social media, shows the fan hurling a barrage of profanities and insults at the woman sitting in front of him. The video shows him screaming obscenities, making sexist remarks, and even physically threatening the woman.

    The Eagles organization swiftly condemned the fan’s behavior and announced that he would no longer be allowed to attend home games. In a statement, the team emphasized that they have a zero-tolerance policy for such behavior and are committed to creating a safe and inclusive environment for all fans.

    In addition to being banned from games, the fan was also fired from his job after his employer became aware of the video. The company released a statement saying that they do not condone such behavior and that the fan’s actions were not representative of their values.

    This incident serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of toxic and abusive behavior, both in person and online. It is a powerful example of how swift and decisive action can be taken to hold individuals accountable for their actions and ensure that everyone can enjoy sporting events in a safe and respectful manner.

    Tags:

    1. Foul-mouthed fan
    2. Eagles home games
    3. Viral tirade
    4. Banned fan
    5. Fired employee
    6. Social media backlash
    7. Misogynistic rant
    8. Eagles fan incident
    9. Workplace consequences
    10. Public outrage

    #Foulmouthed #fan #banned #Eagles #home #games #fired #job #viral #tirade #woman

  • Bury driver stopped in vehicle banned in UK


    GMP The black Tesla Cybertruck parked up at a petrol station next to a Morrisons Daily branch and in front of a yellow liveried police carGMP

    Police stopped the driver in Bury near Manchester

    A Tesla Cybertruck, which is illegal to drive in the UK due to safety concerns, has been seized by police in Greater Manchester.

    Officers spotted the eye-catching vehicle, which carries a price tag of about £48,000, in Whitefield, Bury, and stopped the driver on Thursday night.

    In April 2024, Tesla recalled thousands of its new Cybertrucks, which weigh more than three tonnes, after concerns about its accelerator pedals.

    In a social media post, Greater Manchester Police (GMP) said: “Whilst this may seem trivial to some, legitimate concerns exist around the safety of other road users or pedestrians if they were involved in a collision with the Cybertruck.”

    It said the vehicle, which was registered and insured abroad, was confiscated and they had reported the driver, who is a UK resident.

    Reuters A silver Tesla Cybertruck is viewed by a crowd of people at a showroomReuters

    The futuristic Cybertruck is legal in the US

    Their post added: “The Tesla Cybertruck is not road-legal in the UK and does not hold a certificate of conformity.”

    The Cybertruck, which is made of rocket-like, bullet-proof steel materials, was launched in 2019.

    The vehicle has been on a promotional tour across the Middle East and Europe, including at the Goodwood Festival of Speed in the UK in 2024.

    However, it has not yet passed UK road safety tests.

    GMP said the car that was seized had been referred to Operation Wolverine, which was established in 2007 to target drivers without insurance.

    The owner will have to prove ownership and correct insurance prior to release.



    Recently, a driver in Bury was stopped by police while driving a vehicle that had been banned in the UK. This shocking incident has raised concerns about the safety of vehicles on the roads and the enforcement of laws surrounding banned vehicles.

    It is crucial for authorities to crack down on individuals who continue to drive vehicles that have been deemed unsafe or illegal for use on UK roads. Not only does this put the driver at risk, but it also endangers the lives of other road users.

    The consequences of driving a banned vehicle can be severe, including fines, penalties, and even imprisonment. It is important for all drivers to ensure that their vehicles meet the necessary safety standards and legal requirements before taking them out on the road.

    Let this incident serve as a reminder to all drivers to abide by the laws and regulations surrounding vehicle safety. The safety of all road users should be a top priority, and driving a banned vehicle is simply not worth the risk.

    Tags:

    1. Bury driver
    2. Vehicle ban UK
    3. Traffic violation
    4. UK driving laws
    5. Banned driver
    6. Traffic offense
    7. Legal consequences
    8. Driving restrictions
    9. Traffic law enforcement
    10. Bury news

    #Bury #driver #stopped #vehicle #banned

  • Supreme Court says TikTok can be banned in the US, leaving its future in limbo




    CNN
     — 

    The Supreme Court ruled Friday that a controversial ban on TikTok may take effect this weekend, rejecting an appeal from the popular app’s owners that claimed the ban violated the First Amendment.

    The court handed down an unsigned opinion and there were no noted dissents.

    The decision, which followed warnings from the Biden administration that the app posed a “grave” national security threat because of its ties to China, will allow the ban to start Sunday. But there are a lot of lingering questions about how the ban would work in practice because there’s no precedent for the US government blocking a major social media platform. And how exactly the government would enforce it remains unclear.

    In its opinion, the Supreme Court acknowledged that for 170 million Americans TikTok offers “a distinctive and expansive outlet for expression, means of engagement, and source of community.”

    But the court said, Congress was focused on national security concerns and that, the court said, was a deciding factor in how it weighed the case.

    “Congress has determined that divestiture is necessary to address its well-supported national security concerns regarding TikTok’s data collection practices and relationship with a foreign adversary,” the court wrote.

    The ruling also puts the spotlight on President-elect on Donald Trump.

    In the runup to the ban’s effective date, President Joe Biden’s administration signaled it would leave enforcement of the ban to Trump, who will be inaugurated on Monday. Despite that, TikTok has said it may “go dark” when the ban takes effect.

    A Biden administration official told CNN Thursday that the outgoing president plans to leave it to Trump to enforce any ban.

    “Our position on this has been clear: TikTok should continue to operate under American ownership,” a Biden administration official said. “Given the timing of when it goes into effect over a holiday weekend a day before inauguration, it will be up to the next administration to implement.”

    TikTok CEO Shou Chew is set to be seated on the dais, alongside other leading tech CEOs, at Trump’s inauguration — perhaps a sign of just how serious the incoming president is about trying to save the app.

    And with some in Congress now suggesting that TikTok might need more time to find a buyer, Trump could find support in trying to push off the ban to a later date.

    The law gives the president the option to extend the ban by 90 days, but triggering the extension requires evidence that parties working on purchasing have made significant progress, including binding legal agreements for such a deal — and TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, hasn’t publicly updated its stance that the app is not for sale.

    CNN’s Clare Duffy contributed to this report.

    This story is breaking and will be updated.



    In a shocking turn of events, the Supreme Court has ruled that TikTok can be banned in the United States, leaving its future in limbo. This decision comes after months of legal battles between the popular social media platform and the Trump administration.

    The Trump administration had argued that TikTok posed a national security threat due to its Chinese ownership, and had attempted to ban the app from app stores in the US. However, lower courts had blocked these efforts, leading to the case being taken up by the Supreme Court.

    With this ruling, TikTok’s future in the US is uncertain. While the app remains available for now, it is unclear how long that will last. Users are left wondering if they will soon have to find alternative platforms for their social media needs.

    The decision has sparked outrage among TikTok users and supporters, who argue that the app provides a valuable platform for creativity and connection. Many are concerned about the implications of the ruling for free speech and the future of social media in the US.

    As TikTok’s fate hangs in the balance, only time will tell what the future holds for the popular app. Will it be able to weather this storm and continue to thrive, or will it be forced to shut down in the US? Only time will tell.

    Tags:

    Supreme Court ruling, TikTok ban, US ban on TikTok, TikTok future uncertain, TikTok legal battle, social media ban, Supreme Court decision, TikTok controversy, TikTok legality, TikTok news, TikTok update, TikTok ban in the US

    #Supreme #Court #TikTok #banned #leaving #future #limbo