Zion Tech Group

Tag: Bans

  • Trade war begins: After Trump’s tariffs, Canada province bans US firms & dumps Musk’s Starlink


    Trade war begins: After Trump's tariffs, Canada province bans US firms & dumps Musk's Starlink
    US President Donald Trump (File photo)

    Canada’s Ontario on Monday banned US firms from government contracts in a move that will scrap $100-million deal with Elon Musk‘s Starlink.
    Doug Ford, premier of Ontario, said the ban would persist unless the Trump administration lifts recently imposed tariffs on Canada.
    Last year, the Doug dispensation had inked an agreement with Musk, who is a key part of the Trump government, to deliver high-speed internet to remote residents in rural and northern Ontario.
    “Every year, the Ontario government and its agencies spend $30 billion on procurement, alongside our $200 billion plan to build Ontario. US-based businesses will now lose out on tens of billions of dollars in new revenues. They only have President Trump to blame. We’re going one step further. We’ll be ripping up the province’s contract with Starlink. Ontario won’t do business with people hellbent on destroying our economy. Canada didn’t start this fight with the U.S., but you better believe we’re ready to win it,” the Ontario premier wrote on X.

    Earlier, Ford announced that his officials would soon be removing American products from provincial liquor store shelves.
    His statement came a day after British Columbia Premier David Eby announced that the local authority will stop buying liquor from US Republican states.
    Canada’s move is in retaliation to Trump’s sweeping new tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico and China, a move that has triggered sharp reactions from global leaders and financial markets.
    The tariffs, which Trump says are aimed at protecting American workers and industries, have sparked fears of economic retaliation from affected countries.
    Meanwhile, Trump said that he would talk to Trudeau at 3.00 PM about drug pouring through the borders of Canada.
    “Canada doesn’t even allow U.S. Banks to open or do business there. What’s that all about? Many such things, but it’s also a DRUG WAR, and hundreds of thousands of people have died in the U.S. from drugs pouring through the Borders of Mexico and Canada. Just spoke to Justin Trudeau. Will be speaking to him again at 3:00 PM,” Trump said on his social media platform Truth Social.





    In response to President Trump’s recent tariffs on Canadian goods, the province of Ontario has announced a ban on all US-based companies and has decided to cut ties with Elon Musk’s Starlink project. This move comes as a retaliation to the escalating trade war between the two countries, with Ontario officials citing the need to protect their own economy and interests.

    The decision to ban US firms and sever ties with Starlink has sparked controversy and debate within the province, with some critics claiming that the move will only serve to further damage the already strained relationship between Canada and the US. However, Ontario officials have stood by their decision, stating that they will not stand idly by while their economy suffers as a result of Trump’s tariffs.

    The trade war between the US and Canada shows no signs of slowing down, and Ontario’s bold stance against US companies is just the latest development in what could be a long and tumultuous battle. As tensions continue to rise, it remains to be seen how this trade war will ultimately impact both countries and the global economy as a whole.

    Tags:

    1. Trade war
    2. Trump tariffs
    3. Canada province
    4. US firms
    5. Elon Musk
    6. Starlink
    7. Trade tensions
    8. International trade
    9. Economic impact
    10. Global markets

    #Trade #war #begins #Trumps #tariffs #Canada #province #bans #firms #dumps #Musks #Starlink

  • Gov. JB Pritzker bans convicted Jan. 6 participants from consideration for state jobs, in memo



    CBS News Chicago

    Live

    CHICAGO (CBS) — Governor JB Pritzker is calling on the Department of Central Management Services to reject those pardoned by President Trump for their involvement in the Jan. 6 attacks at the U.S. Capitol for consideration for state jobs. 

    In a letter addressed to director Raven DeVaughn, Pritzker says those who participated in attacks violated the State’s personnel code. 

    “I hereby direct CMS to apply the State Personnel Code and consider any participation in the January 6 insurrection as infamous and disgraceful conduct that is antithetical to the mission of the State,” the letter said. 

    Upon returning to office, Mr. Trump signed about 200 executive orders, one including pardons to defendants convicted of crimes stemming from the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. 

    Federal judges in Washington, D.C., who presided over the cases, strongly opposed the order. 

    View the entire letter below: 


    32e8513a-575a-4b55-92b7-bd4bd4e1c918 by
    Jeramie Bizzle on
    Scribd



    In a recent memo, Gov. JB Pritzker has announced that individuals who were convicted participants in the January 6th insurrection at the Capitol will be banned from consideration for state jobs. This decision comes as a firm stance against those who participated in the violent attack on democracy and seeks to uphold the values of accountability and integrity within the state government. Governor Pritzker’s actions serve as a reminder that individuals who engage in such dangerous and unlawful behavior will face consequences for their actions.

    Tags:

    1. Gov. JB Pritzker
    2. Jan. 6 participants
    3. State jobs
    4. Illinois Governor
    5. Convicted individuals
    6. Memo
    7. Government employment
    8. Political news
    9. Illinois state government
    10. Ban on hiring

    #Gov #Pritzker #bans #convicted #Jan #participants #consideration #state #jobs #memo

  • Taliban deputy tells leader there is no excuse for education bans on Afghan women and girls


    A senior Taliban figure has urged the group’s leader to scrap education bans on Afghan women and girls, saying there is no excuse for them, in a rare public rebuke of government policy.

    Sher Abbas Stanikzai, political deputy at the Foreign Ministry, made the remarks in a speech on Saturday in southeastern Khost province.

    He told an audience at a religious school ceremony there was no reason to deny education to women and girls, “just as there was no justification for it in the past and there shouldn’t be one at all.”

    The government has barred females from education after sixth grade. Last September, there were reports authorities had also stopped medical training and courses for women.

    In Afghanistan, women and girls can only be treated by female doctors and health professionals. Authorities have yet to confirm the medical training ban.

    “We call on the leadership again to open the doors of education,” said Stanikzai in a video shared by his official account on the social platform X. “We are committing an injustice against 20 million people out of a population of 40 million, depriving them of all their rights. This is not in Islamic law, but our personal choice or nature.”

    Stanikzai was once the head of the Taliban team in talks that led to the complete withdrawal of foreign troops from Afghanistan.

    It is not the first time he has said that women and girls deserve to have an education. He made similar remarks in September 2022, a year after schools closed for girls and months and before the introduction of a university ban.

    But the latest comments marked his first call for a change in policy and a direct appeal to Taliban leader Hibatullah Akhundzada.

    Ibraheem Bahiss, an analyst with Crisis Group’s South Asia program, said Stanikzai had periodically made statements calling girls’ education a right of all Afghan women.

    “However, this latest statement seems to go further in the sense that he is publicly calling for a change in policy and questioned the legitimacy of the current approach,” Bahiss said.

    In the Pakistani capital, Islamabad, earlier this month, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Malala Yousafzai urged Muslim leaders to challenge the Taliban on women and girls’ education.

    She was speaking at a conference hosted by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and the Muslim World League.

    The U.N. has said that recognition is almost impossible while bans on female education and employment remain in place and women can’t go out in public without a male guardian.

    No country recognizes the Taliban as the legitimate rulers of Afghanistan, but countries like Russia have been building ties with them.

    India has also been developing relations with Afghan authorities.

    In Dubai earlier this month, a meeting between India’s top diplomat, Vikram Mistri, and Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi showed their deepening cooperation.





    In a recent development, a Taliban deputy has reportedly told the leader of the group that there is no excuse for banning education for Afghan women and girls. This statement comes amidst growing concern and backlash from the international community over the Taliban’s oppressive policies towards women’s rights.

    The deputy, whose identity has not been disclosed, is said to have emphasized the importance of education for all Afghan citizens, regardless of gender. The deputy reportedly argued that denying education to women and girls not only goes against basic human rights principles but also undermines the country’s long-term development and stability.

    This bold stance from within the Taliban leadership is a rare and hopeful sign that there may be internal dissent and pushback against the group’s extremist policies. It also underscores the growing pressure on the Taliban to reform and respect the rights of all Afghan citizens, especially women and girls.

    It remains to be seen how the Taliban leader will respond to this dissenting voice from within his ranks. However, this development serves as a reminder that the fight for women’s rights in Afghanistan is far from over, and that there are individuals within the Taliban who recognize the importance of education for all. Let us hope that this message will lead to positive change for Afghan women and girls.

    Tags:

    Taliban, Afghanistan, education bans, women’s rights, Afghan women, girls education, Taliban leader, Taliban deputy, human rights, gender equality, women empowerment, education rights

    #Taliban #deputy #tells #leader #excuse #education #bans #Afghan #women #girls

  • Trump administration bans Americans from using gender ‘X’ on passports


    Secretary of State Marco Rubio ordered the State Department to freeze all applications for passports labeling their gender as ‘X,’ in the latest attempt to reverse government options for individuals who consider themselves gender-fluid.

    ‘The policy of the United States is that an individual’s sex is not changeable,’ an email from the Secretary of State to department staff on Thursday, first reported by the Guardian. 

    Rubio insisted that a person’s ‘sex’ and not ‘gender’ should be used in official government documents, including passports and consular reports of brith abroad documents.

    The X distinction for gender was recently developed during President Joe Biden‘s administration under Secretary of State Tony Blinken.

    President Donald Trump‘s executive order signed Monday that the order would not invalidate existing passports but would need to be corrected when they were renewed.

    Trump’s order also affects Department of Homeland Security and the Office of Personnel Management to correct official government documents to remove any extra gender assignments.

    That could affect Social Security cards, drivers licenses, and other government IDs.

    The White House dismissed concerns from transgender activists that had made gains during the Biden administration to update government documents to reflect a person’s gender of their choice. 

    U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has ordered a ban on Americans selecting X as their gender on U.S. Passports

    U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has ordered a ban on Americans selecting X as their gender on U.S. Passports 

    A international traveler presents a U.S. passport

    A international traveler presents a U.S. passport 

    ‘They can still apply to renew their passport — they just have to use their God-given sex, which was decided at birth,’ White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said to NOTUS. ‘Thanks to President Trump, it is now the official policy of the federal government that there are only two sexes — male and female.’

    Under the Biden administration, U.S. citizens were given the option of selecting (X) as their gender marker on passports, visas, and Global Entry cards. 

    The State Department website included guidance for people who wanted to identify as another ‘gender identity’ such as (X). By Thursday, that page redirected to the main passport request site.

    Trump made the issue of gender part of his campaign, arguing that it fell into the realm of common sense. 

    ‘As of today, it will henceforth be the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders, male and female,’ Trump said during his inaugural address on Monday. 

    The Human Rights campaign, an organization dedicated to defending the rights of transgender individuals to choose their gender vowed to fight Trump’s agenda.

    ‘The incoming administration is trying to divide our communities in the hope that we forget what makes us strong. But we refuse to back down or be intimidated,’ they wrote in a statement. ‘We are not going anywhere. and we will fight back against these harmful provisions with everything we’ve got.’

    The first ever gender ‘X’ passport was given by the Biden state department to veteran Dana Zzyym in 2021, who served in the Navy as a young man before identifying as ‘intersex’ using they/them pronouns.

    This is the United States' first ever intersex passport, given to Navy veteran Dana Zzym in 2021

    This is the United States’ first ever intersex passport, given to Navy veteran Dana Zzym

    Dana Zzyym, pictured, a 63-year-old intersex military vet had been locked in a legal battle with the State Department for over six years, petitioning for a shift in policy to allow 'X' passport

    The inaugural intersex passport was for Dana Zzyym, a 63-year-old intersex activist and military vet who has been locked in a legal battle with the State Department for more than six years, petitioning for a shift in policy to allow intersex passports. Zzyym was denied such a document in 2015

    Zzyym sued the state department in 2015, petitioning for a shift in policy.

    The Biden administration praised the decision as a more inclusive way to handle government documents.

    ‘I want to reiterate, on the occasion of this passport issuance, the Department of State’s commitment to promoting the freedom, dignity, and equality of all people – including LGBTQI+ persons,’ State Department spokesperson Ned Price said in a statement at the time. 



    The Trump administration has recently announced a ban on Americans using the gender designation ‘X’ on their passports. This decision comes after the administration rolled back Obama-era guidelines that allowed individuals to choose a non-binary gender option on federal documents.

    Many LGBTQ advocates and allies have condemned this move, arguing that it is discriminatory and erases the identities of non-binary and gender nonconforming individuals. They argue that everyone should have the right to accurately represent their gender identity on official documents.

    The ban on using ‘X’ as a gender option on passports is a step backwards in the fight for LGBTQ rights and equality. It is important for all individuals to be able to express their gender identity in a way that feels authentic to them. The Trump administration’s decision only serves to further marginalize and erase the existence of non-binary and gender nonconforming individuals.

    Tags:

    1. Trump administration
    2. Gender X
    3. Passport regulations
    4. Identity recognition
    5. Gender identity rights
    6. LGBTQ+ community
    7. Discrimination policies
    8. Travel restrictions
    9. Government rulings
    10. Civil rights issues

    #Trump #administration #bans #Americans #gender #passports

  • California Bans Insurance Policy Cancellations In Boost To Property Owners. The Insurance Industry Prepares For Record-Breaking Losses


    California Bans Insurance Policy Cancellations In Boost To Property Owners. The Insurance Industry Prepares For Record-Breaking Losses
    California Bans Insurance Policy Cancellations In Boost To Property Owners. The Insurance Industry Prepares For Record-Breaking Losses

    Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below.

    The yearlong ban that California’s insurance authority rushed to impose on cancellations in parts of Los Angeles hardest hit by wildfires was likely the last thing insurance companies wanted in the face of anticipated record-breaking claims.

    “Losing your insurance should be the last thing on someone’s mind after surviving a devastating fire,” Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara said in a statement. “This law gives millions of Californians breathing room and hits the pause button on insurance non-renewals while people recover.”

    Don’t Miss:

    The insurance commissioner is literally holding insurance companies’ feet to the fire. As Realtor.com reported, the moratorium on cancellations follows the commissioner’s unveiling of a new rule requiring private insurance firms to start writing new policies in high-risk areas if they wanted to keep doing business in California, but with the concession that they would be allowed to pass the costs on to their customers.

    As of Wednesday, Jan. 15, the Los Angeles area wildfires had killed at least 25 people, destroyed more than 12,000 structures and charred more than 60 square miles. The largest by far – the Palisades and Eaton wildfires – continue to burn out of control. The fire has come at the worst possible time for homeowners – just months after private insurers canceled 1,600 policies in Pacific Palisades over high fire risks. At the same time, major private insurers like State Farm, Nationwide, Farmers Insurance, Allstate, USAA and The Hartford stopped writing new policies in high-risk areas or limited their coverage.

    See Also: CEO of Integris gathered a team of senior investment managers who have $34.22 billion in combined owned and managed assets in the West Coast — here’s how to invest in their private credit fund that targets 12% annual interest rate.

    Faced with the prospect of having their homes uninsured, almost half a million Californians were forced to enroll in the Fair Access to Insurance Requirements (FAIR) Plan, the state-sponsored insurer of last resort. According to Reuters, more than 1,400 homes were covered by the FAIR Plan last year in the Palisades neighborhood alone, up 85% from the previous year.



    The state of California has taken a major step to protect property owners by banning insurance policy cancellations. This move comes as the insurance industry braces for record-breaking losses due to wildfires, hurricanes, and other natural disasters.

    The new legislation prohibits insurance companies from canceling policies for homeowners in high-risk areas, ensuring that residents can maintain coverage and protect their assets. This is a crucial development as climate change continues to increase the frequency and severity of extreme weather events.

    While this decision is a win for property owners, it is expected to have significant financial implications for the insurance industry. With the potential for more claims and payouts, insurers are preparing for unprecedented losses in the coming years.

    As California leads the way in protecting homeowners, other states may follow suit in enacting similar measures to safeguard residents from the growing threat of natural disasters. It is clear that the insurance industry will need to adapt to these changing realities and find innovative solutions to mitigate risks and support policyholders in the face of mounting challenges.

    Tags:

    1. California insurance policy cancellations
    2. Property owners’ insurance rights
    3. Insurance industry impact in California
    4. Record-breaking losses for insurance companies
    5. California regulations on insurance cancellations
    6. Property owners’ protection in California
    7. California insurance industry challenges
    8. Insurance policy changes in California
    9. Impact of California ban on insurance cancellations
    10. Property owners’ relief in California

    #California #Bans #Insurance #Policy #Cancellations #Boost #Property #Owners #Insurance #Industry #Prepares #RecordBreaking #Losses

Chat Icon