Zion Tech Group

Tag: Beatles

  • Charli xcx leads male-dominated Brit awards nominations – with first Beatles nod since 1977 | Brit awards


    Charli xcx leads this year’s Brit awards with five nominations for her 2024-dominating record Brat – the Guardian’s album of last year. With four nominations apiece, Dua Lipa, the Last Dinner Party, Ezra Collective and Myles Smith are close on the pop star’s trail.

    xcx is nominated for album, artist and song of the year – the latter for the remix of Guess featuring Billie Eilish – and in the dance and pop genre categories.

    But despite xcx painting the British music industry’s annual party a violent shade of lime green, women remain underrepresented in this year’s nominations, accounting for 34.7% of the 98 slots. Male acts comprise more than half, at 53%, with mixed-gender acts and collaborations – including the Last Dinner Party – making up the remaining 12.3%.

    It’s a noteworthy year for some vintage groups: the Beatles’ AI-abetted Now and Then is up for best song, the group’s first nomination since the very first Brit awards in 1977. (Prior to becoming an annual fixture in 1983, the first Brits marked Queen Elizabeth II’s silver jubilee and 100 years since the invention of the phonograph, and honoured the preceding 25 years in music, seeing the Beatles earn three nominations.) And with three nominations for Songs of a Lost World – their first album since 2008 – the Cure score their first Brit nominations in more than 30 years in the categories for album of the year, group of the year and alt/rock act.

    At the newer end of the scale, Stargazing singer Smith is this year’s Rising Star winner, tipped by the industry for major success, and is also nominated for new artist, song and pop act.

    Ezra Collective: God Gave Me Feet for Dancing – video

    The genre categories are assembled by the Brits voting academy and then voted for by members of the public via WhatsApp. Predictably, the category for hip-hop/grime/rap act features just one woman, Little Simz, alongside Central Cee, Dave, Ghetts and Stormzy.

    London jazz act Ezra Collective may also be set for a breakthrough year. The five-piece released their third album, Dance, No One’s Watching, in September, after winning the 2023 Mercury prize for their second album. “From a youth club to the Brit awards and beyond,” they said in a statement.

    Some may raise eyebrows at a group active since 2016 being up for new artist – alongside last year’s Mercury winners English Teacher, the Last Dinner Party, Myles Smith and former Brit School student Rachel Chinouriri – but the category parameters stipulate that acts must have had one Top 40 album or single in the eligibility period, but can’t have had a Top 10 album or more than one Top 10 single, nor have had prior nominations for best artist, group or album.

    Despite middling reviews for her third album Radical Optimism – which spent just 19 weeks in the UK Top 100, compared to 220 for her 2020 record Future Nostalgia – Lipa is nominated for album of the year, artist of the year, song of the year (for Training Season) and pop act.

    Last year’s major winner, Raye – who took home six prizes in 2024 – is up for R&B act. “I’m still processing the ridiculousness that was last year!” she said in a statement. “I’m excited to watch Charli xcx clean up this year, she just deserves it so much.”

    Some nascent comebacks also feature: Sam Fender is up for artist of the year and alt/rock act, despite only having released two singles from his forthcoming third album, People Watching, due in February; and Jade, of the on-hiatus band Little Mix, is up for song of the year (for Angel of My Dreams) and pop act.

    In the international categories, Taylor Swift, Chappell Roan, Sabrina Carpenter and Billie Eilish have two nods apiece; Eilish also clocks a third nomination alongside xcx in the song category.

    “Thank you so much for the nominations and the recognition of my art,” Roan said in a statement. “The UK has always shown me so much love and championed me through these past few years. It was one of the first places that Good Luck, Babe! blew up in, so this feels extra special.”

    The awards for producer and songwriter of the year will be announced prior to the ceremony, which takes place on 1 March at the O2 Arena in London. Returning for the first time since 2021, Jack Whitehall reclaims hosting duties. No performers have yet been announced for the night.

    The nominations in full

    Album of the year

    Abigail Morris of the Last Dinner Party performing at Glastonbury in 2024. Photograph: Jonny Weeks/the Guardian

    Artist of the year

    • Beabadoobee

    • Central Cee

    • Charli xcx

    • Dua Lipa

    • Fred Again

    • Jamie xx

    • Michael Kiwanuka

    • Nia Archives

    • Rachel Chinouriri

    • Sam Fender

    Group of the year

    • Bring Me the Horizon

    • Coldplay

    • The Cure

    • Ezra Collective

    • The Last Dinner Party

    Best new artist

    • English Teacher

    • Ezra Collective

    • The Last Dinner Party

    • Myles Smith

    • Rachel Chinouriri

    Song of the year

    Jordan Adetunji. Photograph: Shamaal
    • Artemas – I Like the Way You Kiss Me

    • The Beatles – Now and Then

    • Bl3ss – X Camrin Watsin (ft Bbyclose)

    • Central Cee – Band4Band (ft Lil Baby)

    • Charli xcx – Guess (ft Billie Eilish)

    • Chase and Status/Stormzy – Backbone

    • Coldplay – Feels Like I’m Falling in Love

    • Dua Lipa – Training Season

    • Ella Henderson – Alibi (ft Rudimental)

    • Jade – Angel of My Dreams

    • Jordan Adetunji – Kehlani

    • KSI – Thick of It (ft Trippie Redd)

    • Myles Smith – Stargazing

    • Sam Ryder – You’re Christmas to Me

    • Sonny Fodera/Jazzy/DOD – Somedays

    Alt/rock act

    • Beabadoobee

    • The Cure

    • Ezra Collective

    • The Last Dinner Party

    • Sam Fender

    Hip-hop/grime/rap act

    • Central Cee

    • Dave

    • Ghetts

    • Little Simz

    • Stormzy

    Dance act

    • Becky Hill

    • Charli xcx

    • Chase and Status

    • Fred Again

    • Nia Archives

    Pop act

    • Charli xcx

    • Dua Lipa

    • Jade

    • Lola Young

    • Myles Smith

    R&B act

    • Cleo Sol

    • Flo

    • Jorja Smith

    • Michael Kiwanuka

    • Raye

    Rising star

    • Myles Smith (winner)

    • Elmeine

    • Good Neighbours

    International artist of the year

    • Adrianne Lenker

    • Asake

    • Benson Boone

    • Beyoncé

    • Billie Eilish

    • Chappell Roan

    • Kendrick Lamar

    • Sabrina Carpenter

    • Taylor Swift

    • Tyler, the Creator

    International group of the year

    Amy Taylor of Amyl and the Sniffers. Photograph: Antonio Olmos/the Observer
    • Amyl and the Sniffers

    • Confidence Man

    • Fontaines DC

    • Future and Metro Boomin

    • Linkin Park

    International song of the year

    • Benson Boone – Beautiful Things

    • Beyoncé – Texas Hold ’Em

    • Billie Eilish – Birds of a Feather

    • Chappell Roan – Good Luck, Babe!

    • Djo – End of Beginning

    • Eminem – Houdini

    • Hozier – Too Sweet

    • Jack Harlow – Lovin’ on Me

    • Noah Kahan – Stick Season

    • Post Malone – I Had Some Help (ft Morgan Wallen)

    • Sabrina Carpenter – Espresso

    • Shaboozey – A Bar Song (Tipsy)

    • Taylor Swift – Fortnight (ft Post Malone)

    • Teddy Swims – Lose Control

    • Tommy Richman – Million Dollar Baby



    The Brit Awards nominations have just been announced, and Charli XCX is leading the pack in a male-dominated field. This year marks the first time since 1977 that a female artist has received a Beatles nod, with Charli XCX being recognized for her groundbreaking work in the music industry.

    The Brit Awards are one of the most prestigious music awards in the UK, and this year’s nominations are no exception. Charli XCX has been nominated in multiple categories, including Album of the Year, Song of the Year, and Best Female Solo Artist.

    It’s a significant moment for Charli XCX, who has been pushing boundaries and breaking down barriers in the music industry. Her innovative sound and fearless approach to her art have earned her critical acclaim and a dedicated fan base.

    The Beatles nod is a historic moment for Charli XCX, as it marks the first time since 1977 that a female artist has been recognized in this category. It’s a testament to her talent and influence in the music world, and a sign that the industry is becoming more inclusive and diverse.

    Congratulations to Charli XCX on her well-deserved nominations, and here’s to a successful night at the Brit Awards. Let’s celebrate the incredible music being made by artists like her and continue to support and uplift women in the industry.

    Tags:

    1. Charli XCX Brit Awards nominations
    2. Male-dominated Brit Awards
    3. Charli XCX Beatles nod
    4. Brit Awards 2022
    5. Charli XCX music news
    6. Brit Awards nominations
    7. Charli XCX latest updates
    8. Beatles nod at Brit Awards
    9. Charli XCX Brit Awards history
    10. Male-dominated music industry at Brit Awards

    #Charli #xcx #leads #maledominated #Brit #awards #nominations #Beatles #nod #Brit #awards

  • Keith Richards on The Beatles and The Rolling Stones’ differences

    Keith Richards on The Beatles and The Rolling Stones’ differences


    When it comes to big bands from the 1960s, no two stand out more than The Beatles and The Rolling Stones. If the bands that made up the British invasion were an army, then these two musical outfits from London and Liverpool were commanders and captains. It wasn’t just their music, but their general attitude, style, and how they marketed themselves set the foundation for a plethora of other bands who followed them. Despite their influence being similar in this sense, the bands had a lot of key differences, and that was kind of the point. 

    “There was no real future for a British band before The Beatles appeared on The Ed Sullivan Show in February 1964. That was the turning point, after which there was an avalanche,” said Andrew Loog Oldham, the Rolling Stones manager, “It totally transformed the possibilities, and as usual, The Beatles were the frontrunners. In music, there is The Beatles, and then there is everybody else.”

    Oldham used the image of the Beatles and crafted the Rolling Stones based on whatever its counter was. Their music was going to be heavier, the charm was replaced with sass, and where the Beatles’ experiences with drugs and alcohol were kept under wraps until near the end of the decade, the Rolling Stones wore their rebellion like a badge of honour. While it might have been Ian Dury who coined the phrase “sex, drugs and rock ‘n’ roll”, it was the Rolling Stones who were living it. 

    As such, when you sit down and consider the key differences between The Beatles and The Rolling Stones, you can dig through hours of songs and interviews that flaunt them. However, if you were to ask Richards, one of the key players in the Rolling Stones and a huge creative voice within the band, he thought their main difference was much more surface-level. Leaving aside comments regarding sound, image and perception, Richards thought simply the layout of the bands was enough to set them apart. 

    Paul McCartney recalled Richards saying as much to him once. “I remember Keith Richards saying to me, ‘You had four singers. We only had one!’” said McCartney, “Little things like that will set me off and I think, ‘Wow’. That is pretty uncanny. And writers. Not just singers, but writers.”

    It’s no secret that the Rolling Stones struggled to come up with original material at first. Many of their initial songs were recordings of covers, as Jagger and Richards had a hard time getting lyrics, music, and song structure together enough to call it a track. It wasn’t until Oldham stepped in and took drastic measures that their first original was created.

    “When you start writing, it doesn’t matter where the first one comes from,” said Richards, recalling the event, “You’ve got to start somewhere, right? So Andrew locked Mick and myself into a kitchen in this horrible little apartment we had. He said, ‘You ain’t comin’ out’, and there was no way out.”

    With that in mind, it’s not surprising that Richards would look at the creative dynamic of the Beatles and see that as a huge difference. The writing aspect was something he struggled with, and so the idea of having more singers and minds contributing to it will have appealed in a big way. Was it the biggest difference between the two bands? That might be a stretch.

    Related Topics

    Subscribe To The Far Out Newsletter



    Keith Richards, legendary guitarist of The Rolling Stones, recently opened up about the differences between his band and The Beatles in a candid interview. Richards, known for his no-nonsense attitude and straight talk, didn’t hold back when discussing the two iconic bands.

    One of the main differences Richards pointed out was the dynamic between the members of each group. He described The Beatles as being more of a “boy band” with a clean-cut image, while The Rolling Stones were the “bad boys” of rock and roll. Richards emphasized the rebellious nature of The Stones, contrasting it with The Beatles’ more polished and controlled persona.

    Another key distinction Richards highlighted was the musical styles of the two bands. While The Beatles were known for their catchy pop tunes and harmonious melodies, The Rolling Stones were pioneers of the gritty, blues-infused rock sound that defined the 1960s. Richards explained that The Stones were more interested in pushing boundaries and exploring different genres, whereas The Beatles were more focused on creating radio-friendly hits.

    Despite these differences, Richards made it clear that there was a mutual respect between the two bands. He praised The Beatles for their songwriting abilities and innovative approach to music, acknowledging their immense influence on the industry. However, he also emphasized that The Rolling Stones were a force to be reckoned with in their own right, carving out their own unique niche in the world of rock and roll.

    In the end, Richards’ insights shed light on the complex relationship between The Beatles and The Rolling Stones, highlighting the distinct personalities and musical styles that set them apart. Fans of both bands will undoubtedly appreciate his candid and unfiltered take on the legendary rivalry between two of the greatest acts in rock history.

    Tags:

    1. Keith Richards
    2. The Beatles
    3. The Rolling Stones
    4. Music legends
    5. Rock and roll history
    6. Musical influences
    7. Band dynamics
    8. Rock music rivalry
    9. British rock bands
    10. Keith Richards interview

    #Keith #Richards #Beatles #Rolling #Stones #differences

  • The Main Difference Between the Beatles and the Rolling Stones

    The Main Difference Between the Beatles and the Rolling Stones


    If you asked fans of either band, they could probably tell you a few key differences between the Beatles and the Rolling Stones. Though they are somewhat cut from the same cloth–both having blues inspirations and being apart of the “British Invasion”–they stand in contrast as well.

    According to Keith Richards, there is one main difference that set the two bands apart. Find out what that is, below.

    [RELATED: The Holiday Tune Rolling Stones Guitarist Keith Richards Called “the Hippest Christmas Song There Is”]

    The Main Difference Between the Beatles and the Rolling Stones, According to Keith Richards

    Well, I never kept a dollar past sunset
    It always burned a hole in my pants
    Never made a school mama happy
    Never blew a second chance, oh no

    I need a love to keep me happy
    I need a love to keep me happy
    Baby, baby, keep me happy
    Baby, baby, keep me happy

    Before digging deep enough to get into conversations about sound and attitude, the Stones and the Beatles have apparent differences that you can see at first glance. According to Richards, he marveled at the fact the Beatles had four unique singers while the Stones only had one, Mick Jagger. It’s something even Paul McCartney has marveled at in the past, despite having lived it first hand.

    “I remember Keith Richards saying to me, ‘You had four singers. We only had one,’” McCartney once recalled. “Little things like that will set me off and I think, ‘Wow.’ That is pretty uncanny. And writers. Not just singers, but writers.”

    “So you had me and John [Lennon] as writers and then George [Harrison] was a hell of a writer and then Ringo [Starr] comes up with ‘Octopus’s Garden’ and a couple of others,” he continued. “I love to go on about it because in going on about it, it brings back memories.”

    Though Jagger certainly holds his own as a singer, it’s always an advantage to have more than one strong vocalist in your band. Despite agreeing with Richards’ claim regarding the Beatles, we have to push back a little on his opinion of his own singing chops.

    Richards has stepped behind the mic a time or two during the Stones’ tenure. Find three of Richards’ best vocal moments, HERE.

    Always took candy from strangers
    Didn’t wanna get me no trade
    Never want to be like papa
    Working for the boss every night and day

    I need a love to keep me happy
    I need a love to keep me happy
    Baby, baby, keep me happy
    Baby, baby, keep me happy

    (Photo by Christopher Simon Sykes/Hulton Archive/Getty Images)





    When it comes to the debate between the Beatles and the Rolling Stones, one of the main differences that stands out is their approach to music and image.

    The Beatles were known for their harmonious melodies, catchy tunes, and innovative songwriting. They were pioneers in the studio, experimenting with new sounds and techniques that pushed the boundaries of what was possible in popular music. Their image was clean-cut and wholesome, appealing to a wide audience of fans around the world.

    On the other hand, the Rolling Stones were more rebellious and edgy. Their music was gritty, raw, and often raunchy, reflecting the band’s rock and roll lifestyle. They were known for their swagger and attitude, with frontman Mick Jagger’s charismatic stage presence captivating audiences wherever they performed.

    While both bands were incredibly successful and influential in their own right, these differences in musical style and image set them apart from each other. The Beatles were seen as the more polished and sophisticated of the two, while the Rolling Stones were seen as the bad boys of rock and roll. Ultimately, both bands left an indelible mark on the music industry and continue to be celebrated for their contributions to music history.

    Tags:

    1. Beatles vs Rolling Stones comparison
    2. Beatles and Rolling Stones contrast
    3. Beatles vs Rolling Stones musical styles
    4. Beatles vs Rolling Stones influence
    5. Beatles vs Rolling Stones discography
    6. Beatles vs Rolling Stones impact on music
    7. Beatles vs Rolling Stones rivalry
    8. Beatles vs Rolling Stones legendary bands
    9. Beatles vs Rolling Stones music history
    10. Beatles vs Rolling Stones iconic bands

    #Main #Difference #Beatles #Rolling #Stones

  • THE BEATLES 3 CDG SET CHARTBUSTER HITS KARAOKE 50 SONGS CD+G YELLOW SUB 5132

    THE BEATLES 3 CDG SET CHARTBUSTER HITS KARAOKE 50 SONGS CD+G YELLOW SUB 5132



    THE BEATLES 3 CDG SET CHARTBUSTER HITS KARAOKE 50 SONGS CD+G YELLOW SUB 5132

    Price : 25.95 – 23.61

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    Are you a Beatles fan looking to take your karaoke game to the next level? Look no further than THE BEATLES 3 CDG SET CHARTBUSTER HITS KARAOKE, featuring 50 of the band’s greatest hits on CD+G format.

    From classics like “Hey Jude” and “Let It Be” to fan favorites like “Yellow Submarine” and “Twist and Shout,” this set has everything you need to sing along to the iconic tunes of the Fab Four.

    With high-quality audio and on-screen lyrics, you’ll feel like you’re performing live on stage with John, Paul, George, and Ringo. So gather your friends, warm up your vocal cords, and get ready to rock out with THE BEATLES 3 CDG SET CHARTBUSTER HITS KARAOKE. Get your copy today and start your own Beatles tribute band! #BeatlesKaraoke #YellowSubmarine5132
    #BEATLES #CDG #SET #CHARTBUSTER #HITS #KARAOKE #SONGS #CDG #YELLOW, Platter

  • When Muhammad Ali Tried to Reunite the Beatles

    When Muhammad Ali Tried to Reunite the Beatles


    George Harrison thought it could happen.

    It was January 1977, and the onetime member of the Beatles was being quizzed about the potential for the group to reunite after going their separate ways seven years earlier.

    “Will it happen?” Harrison asked rhetorically. “I suppose so. There is definitely no reason why it’s absolutely out of the question for the rest of our lives.”

    Of course, no such reunion ever took place. But it certainly wasn’t for lack of trying. For a period in the 1970s, a number of promoters, entrepreneurs, and optimists mounted attempts to get the Fab Four back on stage. While most simply tried to entice the band with money—and in ever-increasing amounts—one man opted to take a different approach. He believed the one way the Beatles could reappear was if he could crowdfund the money needed and appeal to the group’s charitable nature. In a brash and impulsive move, he even roped boxing legend Muhammad Ali into the picture.

    All any Beatles fan needed to make their dream come true was to send in a single dollar.

    A Band Apart

    The Beatles—Paul McCartney, John Lennon, Ringo Starr, and George Harrison—arrived in New York City for the first time on February 7, 1964. The assembled crowd of around 4000 who welcomed them at JFK Airport seems quaint compared to the histrionics that followed. Roughly 74 million people saw them perform on The Ed Sullivan Show days later. For the next six years, the band was likely the most famous musical group on the planet. One hit record followed another, from Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band to The White Album.

    But unlike contemporaries the Rolling Stones or the Who, the Beatles were not built to last. According to Lennon, the death of manager Brian Epstein in 1967 was the beginning of the end.

    “After Brian died, we collapsed,” Lennon said. “Paul took over and supposedly led us. But what is leading us, when we went round in circles? We broke up then.”

    Infighting, lawsuits, and bad feelings made a comeback unlikely in the extreme, especially once the bandmates went on to solo careers. But as the 1970s progressed, the appetite for a repeat of Beatlemania grew: Sales of compilation albums and back catalog hits were encouraging, with millions of copies sold. It was even said some attendees of McCartney’s tour with his new band, Wings, were there in the hopes of seeing some of his old bandmates trot onstage.

    The Beatles are pictured

    The Beatles took over the U.S. and UK in the 1960s. | Fox Photos/GettyImages

    As more time passed, some came to believe a Beatles one-night-only return performance would break show business records. Promoter Bill Sergent floated a $50 million deal. Sid Bernstein, who once booked the group at Carnegie Hall, made a $100 million offer.

    Alan Amron had another idea. A 28-year-old entrepreneur from Long Island with a laudable track record—he invented a high-powered water gun before the Super Soaker and a sticky notepad before the Post-It—Amron believed that the best way to get the group to agree would be to demonstrate the public’s appetite for it.

    How? By having them pay for it.

    “I thought it would be easy to get a dollar from every Beatles fan in the world to reunite the Beatles,” Amron tells Mental Floss. “A by-the-people funded event.”

    Amron launched the International Committee to Reunite the Beatles in 1976. His plan was to solicit $1 from each of the group’s fans, with an eye on amassing as much as $50 million by the 10th anniversary of Sgt. Pepper’s in June 1977.

    “There are 200 million Beatles fans in the world,” Amron said in 1977. “This is a fact. And if there are 200 million Beatles fans, it could reach 100 million of them and if only half send in a dollar, that’s $50 million.”

    To publicize his idea, he took out an ad in The Village Voice, a New York City alt-weekly, and had his campaign highlighted in Rolling Stone.

    The reaction was swift, and mostly positive. “I had started to get money in envelopes in the mail literally from all over the world,” Amron says, “and in currency that I never even seen before, from countries I didn’t even know existed.”

    Money was one thing. Connections were another. Getting a meeting with a Beatle or their representatives would be difficult without an intermediary, and so would mounting a complex telecast Amron had planned for the concert. Then, Amron had a stroke of luck. While on vacation in Miami Beach, Amron walked into a diner and spotted the only man who could conceivably make a claim to being more famous than the Beatles: Muhammad Ali.

    Amron seized the moment. “I read that Ali knew the Beatles and loved them,” Amron says, “so I approached him in a Miami Beach diner asking for his help to raise the people’s money and then in broadcasting the event worldwide into movie theaters like he was successfully doing at the time with his boxing matches.”

    Amron tapped Ali on his broad shoulders. “Excuse me, sir,” he said, “but I’m trying to re-form the Beatles. Would you like to help?”

    The cold approach worked. Ali loved the idea and invited Amron to his home in Chicago. With his business partner Joel Sacher, Amron flew in and sat down with the former heavyweight champion, who agreed to take up the cause.

    “Our partnering with him made the front pages of major newspapers around the world,” Amron says. “Ali was the most famous person on the planet. The funding picked up 2000 percent overnight. Ali even invited Joel and I to President Jimmy Carter’s inaugural ball in Washington, D.C.”

    In another welcome coincidence, there was a person on Carter’s inauguration guest list that the three desperately wanted to meet: John Lennon.

    Let It Be

    The event, which was held in January 1977, seemed like a perfect storm of opportunity. In one corner was Amron, Sacher, and Ali; in the other was Lennon, and with him an opportunity to make a face-to-face appeal without intermediaries or lawyers.

    Lennon reportedly listened to Ali’s pitch for a reunion that would benefit charity, perhaps by as much as $200 million. Out of interest or politeness, he didn’t shoot down the idea but instead offered to meet Ali and discuss it further at his apartment at the Dakota, a residential building on New York’s Upper West Side.

    Yoko Ono, John Lennon, and Muhammad Ali are pictured

    With Yoko Ono, John Lennon greets Muhammad Ali in 1977. | Wally McNamee/GettyImages

    “I hope to impress them with the idea that this is money to help people all over the world,” Ali said a few days later. “I don’t need the money, and neither do the Beatles. The idea is to create this fund, and to help people develop a quality of the heart.” The money, he said, would go toward “feeding and clothing the poor children of the world.”

    At this point, Amron felt the event was a real possibility. “We never got a ‘no,’ ” he says. “We got messages back from all four members that were ‘yes,’ ‘yes,’ ‘maybe,’ and ‘it could happen someday if it was the right situation.’ ”

    It seemed like that right situation was finally coming together. But Lennon and Ali never met in Lennon’s apartment. Instead, representatives for the factions met and talked. Depending on the time and source, it was either encouraging or not. When asked by Playboy interviewer David Sheff in September 1980 about the idea of a charity concert, Lennon was dismissive.

    “After the $200 million is gone, then what?” he said. “It goes round and round in circles. You can pour money in forever … There is no one concert. We would have to dedicate the rest of our lives to one world concert tour, and I’m not ready for it. Not in this lifetime, anyway.”

    Even Harrison, once optimistic, turned sour by 1979.

    “It will never happen,” he said. “In the end, it wasn’t nearly as much fun for us as it was for you. … Let’s face it, the Beatles can’t save the world. We’ll be lucky if we can save ourselves.”

    The project came to an untimely end on December 8, 1980. “The idea was a few years in the making when it all ended abruptly when John Lennon was assassinated,” Amron says. Mark David Chapman shot and killed the former Beatle outside the apartment complex where the musician had once invited Ali to visit.

    Amron doesn’t have an exact tally of the total amount raised but recalls it was roughly $6000 early on. Following Lennon’s death, Amron donated the funds to charity.

    While the reunion didn’t materialize, it was far from a waste. Ali liked Amron so much he asked him to help manage his business deals, a partnership that last for around four years. In both the Beatles project and the Ali association, Amron had developed some additional caché in the business world. “It made meeting with big stars and important corporate people much easier,” he says. “They listened to my every word.”

    Still, it was perhaps a quixotic goal. The last track on the final album the band recorded, 1969’s Abbey Road, was titled “The End.”

    Read More About The Beatles:



    In 1976, boxing legend Muhammad Ali made a bold attempt to reunite the world-famous band The Beatles. At the time, the group had been disbanded for six years, with tensions running high between the members.

    Ali, known for his charisma and charm, thought he could use his influence to bring the band back together. He reached out to each member individually, trying to convince them to put aside their differences and come together for a special reunion performance.

    Despite Ali’s best efforts, his plan ultimately fell through. John Lennon, who had left the band in 1969, was not interested in reuniting with his former bandmates. Paul McCartney and George Harrison were also hesitant, not wanting to revisit past conflicts.

    Although Ali’s attempt to reunite The Beatles was unsuccessful, his efforts showed the power of his personality and his belief in the magic of music to bring people together. The band may never have reunited, but Ali’s bold move remains a fascinating moment in music history.

    Tags:

    Muhammad Ali, Beatles, reunion, iconic moment, music history, cultural impact, celebrity friendships, pop culture, legendary figures, nostalgia, music legends, friendship goals, historic event.

    #Muhammad #Ali #Reunite #Beatles

  • Beatles – When I’m 64 Framed Etched LP Shadowbox

    Beatles – When I’m 64 Framed Etched LP Shadowbox



    Beatles – When I’m 64 Framed Etched LP Shadowbox

    Price : 124.95

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    Are you a Beatles fan looking to add a unique piece of memorabilia to your collection? Look no further than this stunning framed etched LP shadowbox featuring the iconic Beatles song “When I’m 64.”

    This shadowbox is the perfect way to showcase your love for the legendary band and their timeless music. The etched LP adds a touch of vintage charm, while the sleek black frame gives it a modern and sophisticated look.

    Whether you’re a die-hard Beatles fan or just appreciate good music, this shadowbox is sure to make a statement in any room. It also makes a great gift for any music lover in your life.

    Don’t miss out on this one-of-a-kind piece of Beatles memorabilia. Order yours today and bring a little piece of music history into your home.
    #Beatles #Framed #Etched #Shadowbox, Platter

  • Beatles Abbey Road Cover – 7″-12″ DJ slipmat for LP turntable record player

    Beatles Abbey Road Cover – 7″-12″ DJ slipmat for LP turntable record player



    Beatles Abbey Road Cover – 7″-12″ DJ slipmat for LP turntable record player

    Price : 15.99

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    Calling all Beatles fans and vinyl enthusiasts! Check out this awesome Beatles Abbey Road Cover 7″-12″ DJ slipmat for LP turntable record players.

    This slipmat features the iconic Abbey Road album cover artwork, making it the perfect addition to your vinyl setup. Not only does it look great, but it also helps protect your records and improve sound quality while you DJ or listen to your favorite Beatles tunes.

    Don’t miss out on this must-have accessory for any Beatles lover or vinyl collector. Get yours today and take your record player to the next level! #Beatles #AbbeyRoad #Vinyl #RecordPlayer #DJSlipmat
    #Beatles #Abbey #Road #Cover #slipmat #turntable #record #player, Platter

  • Beatles Abbey Road Cherry wood Reproduction Signature Record Display “M4”

    Beatles Abbey Road Cherry wood Reproduction Signature Record Display “M4”



    Beatles Abbey Road Cherry wood Reproduction Signature Record Display “M4”

    Price : 225.00

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    Introducing the Beatles Abbey Road Cherry Wood Reproduction Signature Record Display “M4”!

    This stunning piece features a high-quality reproduction of the iconic Abbey Road album cover, complete with the signatures of all four Beatles: John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, and Ringo Starr.

    Crafted from beautiful cherry wood, this display is the perfect addition to any music lover’s collection. Whether you’re a die-hard Beatles fan or simply appreciate great music, this piece is sure to impress.

    Don’t miss your chance to own a piece of music history with the Beatles Abbey Road Cherry Wood Reproduction Signature Record Display “M4”. Get yours today!

    #TheBeatles #AbbeyRoad #MusicMemorabilia #CherryWoodDisplay #Collectibles
    #Beatles #Abbey #Road #Cherry #wood #Reproduction #Signature #Record #Display

  • Beatles “Yesterday” Reproduction Signed Silver Record Display Wood Plaque

    Beatles “Yesterday” Reproduction Signed Silver Record Display Wood Plaque



    Beatles “Yesterday” Reproduction Signed Silver Record Display Wood Plaque

    Price : 99.95

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    Introducing the Beatles “Yesterday” Reproduction Signed Silver Record Display Wood Plaque!

    This stunning piece features a reproduction of the iconic Beatles song “Yesterday” on a silver vinyl record, beautifully mounted on a high-quality wood plaque. The record is signed by all four members of the legendary band, making it a truly unique and collectible item for any Beatles fan.

    Whether you’re a die-hard Beatles enthusiast or just appreciate good music, this plaque is sure to make a statement in any room. Hang it on your wall or display it on a shelf to add a touch of rock ‘n’ roll nostalgia to your home decor.

    Don’t miss your chance to own this one-of-a-kind Beatles collectible. Order yours today and bring a piece of music history into your home! #TheBeatles #Yesterday #MusicMemorabilia
    #Beatles #Yesterday #Reproduction #Signed #Silver #Record #Display #Wood #Plaque

  • The Beatles “Come Together” Framed Record Display

    The Beatles “Come Together” Framed Record Display



    The Beatles “Come Together” Framed Record Display

    Price : 129.95

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    Are you a fan of The Beatles and their iconic song “Come Together”? Then this framed record display is the perfect addition to your music collection!

    This display features a vintage vinyl record of “Come Together” by The Beatles, beautifully framed and ready to hang on your wall. The record is in mint condition and comes with a certificate of authenticity.

    Whether you’re a longtime Beatles fan or just discovering their music, this framed record display is a must-have for any music lover. It also makes a great gift for a friend or family member who shares your love for classic rock music.

    Don’t miss out on this unique and timeless piece of music memorabilia. Order your Beatles “Come Together” framed record display today and add a touch of musical history to your home decor.
    #Beatles #Framed #Record #Display

Chat Icon