Zion Tech Group

Tag: BornAlive

  • Pro-lifers pounce on Fetterman for opposing ‘Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act’: ‘Infanticide’


    Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., and all other Senate Democrats blocked the “Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act” from advancing in the chamber on Wednesday.

    The measure would require healthcare practitioners to seek to save the life of a baby born during an attempted abortion, and ensure that the infant is hospitalized.

    “I’ve always stood on the side of Roe and a woman’s right to make her own health care choices. It’s absurd to mandate criminalization because of those choices. Any bill that does so, including the Born-Alive Survivors Protection Act, is a NO from me,” Fetterman declared in a post on X.

    JOHN FETTERMAN AND LINDSEY GRAHAM ADVOCATE FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF IRAN’S NUCLEAR PROGRAM

    Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., speaks to reporters as he goes to vote on the Laken Riley Act at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 9, 2025. (ALLISON ROBBERT/AFP via Getty Images)

    In a 52-47 party-line vote, 52 Republicans voted to proceed, while 45 Democrats and the two independent senators aligned with the Senate Democratic Caucus voted to block the bill from moving toward a vote.

    The text of the measure stipulates that healthcare providers present when a baby is born alive amid an attempted abortion must “exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of the child as a reasonably diligent and conscientious health care practitioner would render to any other child born alive at the same gestational age” and then “ensure that the child born alive is immediately transported and admitted to a hospital.”

    The measure explicitly precludes prosecution of the child’s mother.

    “The mother of a child born alive described under subsection (a) may not be prosecuted for a violation of this section, an attempt to violate this section, a conspiracy to violate this section, or an offense under section 3 or 4 of this title based on such a violation,” the text of the legislation reads.

    CHIP ROY LEADS HOUSE REPUBLICANS IN EFFORT TO REPEAL LAW USED BY BIDEN ADMINISTRATION TO PROSECUTE PRO-LIFERS

    Pro-lifers decried Fetterman’s position.

    “You just voted against medical care for a crying infant, begging for help, struggling to survive after a failed abortion. You have believed the leftist lie that killing babies – in this case now a BORN baby struggling for his life – is ever acceptable. Pure evil,” Lila Rose, president and founder of Live Action, declared in a tweet.

    Students for Life of America President Kristan Hawkins placed the handshake emoji in between the words “Fetterman” and “Infanticide.” 

    SEN. DAVE MCCORMICK ‘OPTIMISTIC’ ABOUT WORKING WITH SEN. FETTERMAN TO FIND ‘COMMON GROUND’: ‘EMBRACING’ CHANGE

    Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., speaks to reporters before a Senate luncheon at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 12, 2023. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Katie Glenn Daniel, director of legal affairs and policy counsel for Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, wrote in response to Fetterman’s post, “My dude, it’s literally called the Born-ALIVE Abortion SURVIVORS Protection Act. A baby is born, breathing and squirming, and you voted to deny her the life-sustaining healthcare that she would be owed if she was born under any other circumstance.” 



    Pro-lifers are taking aim at Pennsylvania Lt. Gov. John Fetterman after he voiced his opposition to the “Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act,” with some accusing him of endorsing infanticide.

    The bill, which was introduced in the Pennsylvania Senate, would require doctors to provide medical care to infants who survive abortion procedures. Fetterman, a Democrat who is running for the U.S. Senate, has come out against the legislation, arguing that it is unnecessary and politically motivated.

    In response, pro-life advocates have criticized Fetterman for his stance, accusing him of supporting infanticide and showing a lack of respect for the sanctity of life. They argue that all babies, regardless of how they are born, deserve medical care and protection.

    Fetterman, on the other hand, maintains that the bill is a deliberate attempt to restrict access to abortion and interfere with the doctor-patient relationship. He has called on lawmakers to focus on issues that will improve the lives of Pennsylvanians, rather than pushing divisive and harmful legislation.

    As the debate over the “Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act” continues, it is clear that the issue of abortion remains deeply polarizing and contentious. Pro-lifers are determined to hold Fetterman accountable for his position, while Fetterman remains steadfast in his opposition to what he sees as an attack on women’s reproductive rights.

    Tags:

    • Pro-lifers
    • Fetterman
    • Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
    • Infanticide
    • Abortion debate
    • Pro-life movement
    • Political controversy
    • Abortion legislation
    • Anti-abortion advocates
    • Pennsylvania politics

    #Prolifers #pounce #Fetterman #opposing #BornAlive #Abortion #Survivors #Protection #Act #Infanticide

Chat Icon