Zion Tech Group

Tag: Bureau

  • Trump fires Rohit Chopra, director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau


    President Trump has fired the director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Rohit Chopra, in the latest purge of a Biden Administrator holdover.

    Chopra was one of the more important regulators from the previous Democratic administration who was still on the job since Mr. Trump took office on Jan. 20. In a letter to the president shared on social media, Chopra said it was an “extraordinary privilege” to serve as director of the CFPB.

    “With so much power concentrated in the hands of a few, agencies like the CFPB have never been more critical,” he wrote. “I’m proud that the CFPB has done so much to restore the rule of law.”

    Trump Consumer Agency
    FILE – Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Director Rohit Chopra, speaks from the South Court Auditorium on the White House complex in Washington, April 11, 2022.

    Jacquelyn Martin / AP


    Chopra was notified of his firing via an email from the White House, a person familiar with the notice who was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly told the Associated Press.

    During his term, Mr. Trump had picked Chopra as a Democratic member of the Federal Trade Commission.

    An ally of Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Chopra then was tapped by former President Joe Biden to lead the consumer agency that he helped launch after the 2008-09 financial crisis. He served as its deputy director, sounding the alarm about skyrocketing levels of student loan debt.

    Warren, one of Mr. Trump’s favorite targets, said in a statement that the CFPB under Chopra held “Wall Street accountable for cheating hard-working families” and prevented “the de-banking of Americans across the country, including consumers locked out of the financial system due to overdraft fees, religious organizations, and conservatives.”

    Under the law, Chopra was to serve a five-year term, which meant he could have stayed on as the CFPB director. But he had publicly stated that he would leave his post if the new president asked.

    “I hope that the CFBP will continue to be a pillar of restoring and advancing economic liberty in America, and I wish you good luck in serving our great country,” Chopra said in his letter to Mr. Trump.

    Consumer Reports applauded Chopra’s work at the CFBP saying he “leaves behind an impressive track record of accomplishments for working families.”

    “Rohit Chopra has worked tirelessly at the CFPB to make sure that consumers are protected when they take out a loan, make a payment, or open a bank account,” said Delicia Hand, Senior Director, Digital Marketplace, at Consumer Reports. “Under Chopra’s leadership, the Bureau has scored a number of big wins for consumers, securing billions of dollars in relief for those who have been cheated out of their money and establishing critical new rules to ensure they are treated fairly.”



    In a shocking move, President Trump has decided to fire Rohit Chopra, the director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The decision comes amidst growing tensions between the Trump administration and the independent agency, which was created in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis to protect consumers from abusive financial practices.

    Chopra, a former student loan ombudsman at the CFPB, has been a vocal critic of the Trump administration’s deregulatory agenda and has worked tirelessly to hold financial institutions accountable for their actions. His firing has raised concerns among consumer advocates, who worry that his replacement will be less committed to protecting consumers.

    The Trump administration has not yet announced a replacement for Chopra, but the move is sure to spark controversy and further fuel the debate over the future of the CFPB. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story. #CFPB #RohitChopra #TrumpAdministration #ConsumerProtection

    Tags:

    1. Trump administration
    2. Rohit Chopra
    3. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
    4. CFPB director
    5. Trump fires director
    6. Financial regulation
    7. White House news
    8. Government shake-up
    9. Consumer rights
    10. Political controversy

    #Trump #fires #Rohit #Chopra #director #Consumer #Financial #Protection #Bureau

  • Trump Administration Fires Consumer Bureau Chief Rohit Chopra


    The director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Rohit Chopra, was fired on Saturday, prematurely ending a five-year term that was scheduled to run through late 2026.

    “With so much power concentrated in the hands of a few, agencies like the C.F.P.B. have never been more critical,” Mr. Chopra wrote in a letter he posted on social media announcing his departure.

    Mr. Chopra expected to be fired immediately after President Trump took office, but he improbably hung on for nearly two weeks, even as the president ousted scores of other agency leaders. He used that time to impose a $2 million fine on a money transmitter and release reports on auto lending costs, specialty credit reporting companies and rent payment data.

    When Congress created the consumer bureau in 2011 — to increase oversight of mortgage loans and other financial products in the aftermath of the Great Recession — it included guardrails to protect the agency’s independence and shield it from shifting political tides. But the Supreme Court ruled in 2020 that the president was free to fire the agency’s director without cause, which cleared the way for the bureau’s leadership to change with each presidential administration.

    Mr. Chopra was a scourge of Wall Street, known for his aggressive approach to enforcing consumer protection laws and expanding their boundaries by issuing new rules. He led a crackdown that prompted most large banks to abandon or significantly reduce overdraft fees, and he ordered Wells Fargo to pay $2 billion in 2022 to customers harmed by its misdeeds, which included improperly seizing some borrowers’ cars and homes.

    Mr. Chopra was especially focused on tightening the rules governing large technology companies’ consumer payment services and use of customer data, an effort that drew praise from banking trade groups. But those groups fiercely opposed many of his other actions, often tying them up in years of litigation.

    As part of a Biden administration crusade against “junk fees,” Mr. Chopra issued a rule last year to limit most credit card late payment fees to no more than $8 per month. Banking trade groups sued and won an injunction temporarily blocking it. The consumer bureau has fought the lawsuit, but a new director could choose to end that opposition and curtail or abandon the rule.

    During President Trump’s first term, he installed an acting bureau director — Mick Mulvaney, who later served as his acting chief of staff — who sought to cut off the agency’s funding and cripple its enforcement efforts. He was succeeded by Kathleen Kraninger, who issued rules that gutted Obama-era regulations, including one that would have sharply curtailed payday lending. Former President Joseph R. Biden Jr. ousted Ms. Kraninger immediately upon taking office.

    The bureau will be run by Zixta Martinez, its deputy director, until Mr. Trump chooses a new acting leader. Financial industry officials expect the agency to pare back its oversight, issue fewer new regulations and freeze or rescind some of those imposed by Mr. Chopra.

    He used his departure letter, addressed to Mr. Trump, to pitch the bureau as a prospective partner in enacting consumer protections the president has spoken of endorsing. On the presidential campaign trail, Mr. Trump said he would temporarily limit credit card interest rates to 10 percent.

    “We also have analyzed your promising proposal on capping credit card interest rates, and we see a path for enacting meaningful reforms,” Mr. Chopra wrote.



    In a shocking move, the Trump administration has fired Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Chief Rohit Chopra. This decision comes amidst ongoing controversy and tension within the agency, with Chopra being a vocal critic of the administration’s deregulatory agenda.

    Chopra, a staunch consumer advocate, has been a thorn in the side of the administration since taking over as head of the CFPB. His efforts to hold financial institutions accountable and protect consumers from predatory practices have earned him praise from consumer advocacy groups, but ire from the banking industry and Republican lawmakers.

    The decision to remove Chopra from his position has raised concerns about the future of consumer protection in the United States. Many fear that without his leadership, the CFPB will be weakened and unable to fulfill its mandate of safeguarding consumers from financial harm.

    Critics of the administration’s move argue that it is part of a broader effort to dismantle the regulatory framework put in place after the 2008 financial crisis. They warn that without strong leadership at the CFPB, consumers will be left vulnerable to exploitation by unscrupulous financial institutions.

    As news of Chopra’s firing spreads, there has been an outpouring of support for him on social media, with many calling for his reinstatement. It remains to be seen how the CFPB will move forward without Chopra at the helm, but one thing is clear: his removal has sparked a fierce debate about the future of consumer protection in the United States.

    Tags:

    • Trump Administration
    • Consumer Bureau Chief
    • Rohit Chopra
    • Firing
    • Government news
    • Political updates
    • Trump administration policies
    • Consumer protection
    • Financial regulation
    • White House news

    #Trump #Administration #Fires #Consumer #Bureau #Chief #Rohit #Chopra

  • It’s Time To Shutter The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau


    Created at the behest of Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has the ostensible goal of protecting people from bad actors and practices in the financial marketplace.

    This segment of What’s Ahead lays out how this agency has done more harm to consumers than good. Moreover, its structure is an abomination: It shields the agency from accountability to Congress, since the CFPB gets its money directly from the Federal Reserve instead of from an annual congressional appropriation.

    Given its record and structure, the CFPB should go into the dumpster of history.

    Follow me on TwitterSend me a secure tip





    The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has been a controversial agency since its inception, with critics arguing that it has too much power and too little oversight. Now, as the agency faces scrutiny for its handling of consumer complaints and its lack of transparency, many are calling for it to be shut down altogether.

    The CFPB was established in 2011 in response to the financial crisis, with the goal of protecting consumers from predatory and deceptive financial practices. However, in recent years, the agency has come under fire for its aggressive enforcement actions and its perceived bias against the financial industry.

    Furthermore, the CFPB has been criticized for its lack of accountability and transparency. The agency is funded by the Federal Reserve, which means it is not subject to congressional oversight or budgetary constraints. This lack of oversight has led to concerns about the agency’s unchecked power and its potential for abuse.

    It’s time to shutter the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and replace it with a more transparent and accountable agency. Instead of giving one agency unchecked power over the financial industry, we should create a system that promotes competition and innovation while protecting consumers from fraud and abuse.

    It’s time to rethink how we regulate the financial industry and ensure that consumers are protected without stifling economic growth. Shuttering the CFPB is a necessary step in achieving that goal.

    Tags:

    consumer financial protection bureau, cfpb, financial regulations, government agency, consumer rights, financial protection, regulatory oversight, financial industry, consumer advocacy, government oversight, financial services, consumer complaints, consumer financial education

    #Time #Shutter #Consumer #Financial #Protection #Bureau

  • Robert Santos decides to resign as US Census Bureau director midway through a 5-year term


    Robert Santos, who emphasized inclusivity and outreach to overlooked communities, has decided to resign as director of the U.S. Census Bureau, midway through his five-year term and in the midst of planning for the 2030 census, which will determine political power and federal funding nationwide for another decade.

    Santos, who was appointed by former Democratic President Joe Biden, said in a letter Thursday evening that he made the decision “after deep reflection.” Santos was sworn in as the bureau’s 26th director, and its first Hispanic leader, in 2022.

    His planned departure clears the way for Republican President Donald Trump to reshape the agency’s leadership as his allies in Congress and GOP state attorneys general renew efforts to exclude people in the U.S. illegally from census numbers used to divvy up congressional seats and Electoral College votes among states.

    A Republican redistricting expert wrote that using citizen voting-age population instead of the total population for the purpose of redrawing congressional and legislative districts could be advantageous to Republicans and non-Hispanic white people. The census numbers also guide the distribution of $2.8 trillion in federal dollars to the states for roads, health care and other programs.

    Civil rights groups on Friday urged Trump to appoint an impartial leader to head the nation’s largest statistical agency.

    “The integrity of the U.S. Census Bureau must remain above partisan influence, ensuring that data collection and reporting continue to serve the American people with accuracy, transparency, and fairness,” The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights said in a statement.

    Besides planning for the 2030 census, Santos and other bureau leaders were overseeing changes to the questionnaires for the next once-a-decade head count and the annual American Community Survey when it comes to sexual orientation and gender identity, as well as race and ethnicity.

    Queries about sexual orientation and gender identity were planned for the 2027 annual survey of American life for the first time. The bureau also was implementing a directive from the Biden administration to combine questions about race and ethnicity and add a new Middle Eastern and North African category.

    A law establishing a five-year term for Census Bureau directors was passed in 2012 to provide continuity for the amount of planning required for each census. But the three directors who have led the agency since then have all resigned before their terms expired, either right before or after changes in administrations.

    “The goal was to insulate the planning of the decennial census from presidential politics, and that is clearly not working,” said historian Margo Anderson. “The clock is ticking here.”

    During his term, Santos emphasized restoring trust to the Census Bureau following Trump’s first term. Many census-watchers felt Trump’s administration tried to politicize the 2020 census by installing large numbers of political appointees at the agency and through failed efforts to keep people in the U.S. illegally from being counted for apportionment.

    The Constitution’s 14th Amendment says that “the whole number of persons in each state” should be counted for the numbers used for apportionment.

    Howard Lutnick, Trump’s pick to be secretary of commerce, which oversees the Census Bureau, was asked during a confirmation hearing this week if he would count every person during the census. He responded, “I promise you, we will count each whole person. … That’s what the Constitution says, and we will stick right to it rigorously.”

    Before joining the Census Bureau, Santos was a vice president and chief methodologist at the Urban Institute and had spent four decades in survey research, statistical design and analysis and executive-level management. The Texas native said in his letter that he planned to spend time with his family in retirement.

    ___

    The story has been corrected to show that Robert Santos has decided to resign as director of the U.S. Census Bureau instead of has resigned from the agency.

    ___

    Follow Mike Schneider on the social platform X: @MikeSchneiderAP.





    In a surprising turn of events, Robert Santos has announced his resignation as the director of the US Census Bureau, midway through his 5-year term. Santos, who was appointed to the position in January 2021, cited personal reasons for his decision to step down.

    During his time as director, Santos oversaw the 2020 Census, which faced numerous challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic and political controversies. Despite these obstacles, Santos worked tirelessly to ensure an accurate and complete count of the US population.

    Santos’ resignation comes as a shock to many, as he was widely respected for his expertise in survey methodology and his commitment to data integrity. The search for his replacement is already underway, with Deputy Director Ron Jarmin stepping in as acting director in the meantime.

    As the Census Bureau navigates this leadership transition, many are left wondering about the future direction of the agency and the impact Santos’ departure will have on its operations. Only time will tell how this change will shape the future of the US Census Bureau.

    Tags:

    1. Robert Santos
    2. US Census Bureau
    3. Resignation
    4. Director
    5. 5-year term
    6. Government official
    7. Leadership change
    8. Census data
    9. US government
    10. News update

    #Robert #Santos #decides #resign #Census #Bureau #director #midway #5year #term

  • Bureau Of Prisons Director Colette Peters Out On Trump’s First Day


    Colette Peters has resigned as Director of the Bureau of Prisons after 30 months on the job just as President Donald Trump was inaugurated on Monday. Deputy Director William Lathrop will take over as acting director. An agency outsider, Peters took the BOP job after heading the Oregon Department of Corrections. The challenges she faced at the BOP on day-one of her job in August 2022 were pretty much the same at the end; staffing shortages, crumbling buildings and poor morale.

    Soon after Trump was elected, Peters announced the closure of six male federal prison camps and one female facility, FCI Dublin. Dublin was the facility that earned the name “rape club,” after its warden, chaplain and a number of staff members were convicted of inappropriate sexual relationships with a number of women prisoners. In December, the BOP settled a civil lawsuit brought by 103 women who were incarcerated at FCI Dublin in the amount of $116 million.

    Peters seemed to have a good relationship with Congress. In appearances in front of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, she plainly spoke about the challenges the BOP faced but she had trouble getting results. Many of those challenges she inherited from previous directors. Joe Biden signed the Federal Prison Oversight Law in 2024 which allowed the Office of Inspector General to conduct more unannounced prison inspections. Of the inspections OIG has done over the years, it found significant shortages of staff, poor medical care of prisoners, rotten food and dirty living conditions. While Peters said she welcomed the law, it has not yet been funded.

    There were problems that Peters just could not fix. Staffing, no matter how much money was spent to increase salaries and retention bonuses, was proven to have only modest success. One recent inspection by OIG at FMC Devens, one of seven medical centers in the BOP, had “twenty percent of positions in Correctional Services vacant, as well as 24 percent in Health Services and 39 percent in Psychology Services” leading to “compromise FMC Devens’s ability to provide adequate healthcare to inmates.” Staffing shortages nationwide led to extended lockdowns at facilities and reduced programming.

    The BOP said it needs over $3 billion to bring its aging prisons up to modern standards. However, year after year, the BOP received only a fraction of that which only worsened the problem. The closure of six male prisons, three of which were stand-alone male prisons, was an effort to reduce costs but it was too little, too late.

    Peters did make progress on the First Step Act, Trumps hallmark law that allowed many minimum and low security prisoners to reduce their sentences by participating in programming and productive activities. The First Step Act led to the early release of nearly 50,000 prisoners but was plagued by problems in calculating the credits which resulted in many people staying in prison longer than the law required. In addition, the BOP’s lack of halfway house space led to people staying incarcerated in institutions much longer than necessary.

    Peters attempted to take make a move in public transparency by openly talking about the problems of the BOP through an extensive interview on CBS’ “60 Minutes.” The interview did little to change the perceptions of the public or the people that worked at the BOP. There were awkward moments when Peters was unable to state how many workers were needed to fully staff the prisons and also when Peters walked around the question of whether she owed an apology to female inmates who were sexually assaulted by staff.

    The relationship with front line staff in the prisons was also strained during Peters’ tenure. While Peters attempted to put on a face of a kinder, gentler BOP, staff continued to feel the pressures of long hours and mixed assignments as a result of augmentation (a practice that allows medical staff, case managers or executive assistants to act as corrections officers where there are shortages). There was little progress made with mending relationships with union representatives who represent many front line workers in the prisons. The BOP ranked near the bottom in employee job satisfaction among over 430 federal agencies. The union is also seeking to reverse the closure of the prisons that Peters announced in December.

    It became clear when Trump was elected that changes were coming throughout the government. In his first day as president he called for a temporary hiring freeze and a return of all employees to the office, a remnant of the COVID-19 era. As it relates to corrections, Trump favored the use of private prisons, a practice that both Barack Obama and Biden discouraged. In fact, Trump issued an executive order on his first day reversing the Biden ban on private prisons.

    The BOP is a complicated agency. With an annual budget of $8.3 billion, it has seen the number of prisoners decrease by nearly 50,000 over the past 12 years yet its costs continue to increase. Healthcare costs, inefficiencies associated with old buildings and excessive overtime to meet the demands of supervising 150,000 prisoners 24/7 continues to drive expenses.

    Trump will want his own person as director and rumors started swirling after the election as to whether Peters would survive to serve another administration. It is likely that the Trump administration will look outside of the agency for even more change. With Peters’ exit, it will mean that the next director will be the sixth since Trump took office for his first term. There is a need for stability with an agency that has such a vital interest to our national security. While nearly 50% of all the federal prisoners are minimum or low security, there are many violent prisoners held at higher security prisons.

    The new Trump administration believes it is poised to make big changes and control of the House and Senate by Republicans will lead to bold moves. The non-governmental agency Department of Government Efficiency has promised to cut trillions of dollars from the government. With one of the largest budgets in the Department of Justice, the BOP is ripe for a makeover, but it will take a strong leader to guide the agency to stability while also making it more efficient and humane.



    On President Joe Biden’s first day in office, Bureau of Prisons Director Colette Peters has been asked to resign from her position by the new administration. Peters, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump in 2018, has faced criticism for her handling of the federal prison system, including allegations of mistreatment of inmates and inadequate COVID-19 safety measures.

    The decision to remove Peters from her position comes as part of Biden’s efforts to overhaul the criminal justice system and prioritize the well-being of incarcerated individuals. The new administration has promised to address issues such as overcrowding, lack of resources, and racial disparities within the prison system.

    Peters’ departure marks the beginning of a new chapter for the Bureau of Prisons, as the Biden administration works to implement reforms that will improve conditions for inmates and promote rehabilitation and reentry programs. Stay tuned for updates on the changes ahead for the federal prison system under the leadership of President Biden.

    Tags:

    1. Bureau of Prisons
    2. Director Colette Peters
    3. Trump administration
    4. Department of Justice
    5. Federal prisons
    6. Colette Peters resignation
    7. Trump presidency
    8. Criminal justice reform
    9. Prison oversight
    10. Government leadership

    #Bureau #Prisons #Director #Colette #Peters #Trumps #Day

  • FBI acting chief says he’s retiring as Trump’s pick to lead the bureau awaits Senate confirmation


    WASHINGTON – Paul Abbate, who became the FBI’s acting director following the departure of Christopher Wray, is retiring from the bureau, according to an email he sent to senior executives that was obtained by The Associated Press on Monday.

    Abbate had been expected to run the FBI while Senate confirmation proceedings get underway for Kash Patel, who is President Donald Trump’s pick for director. But with Abbate’s retirement effective Monday, when Trump took office, it was not immediately clear who would fill that role.

    “When the Director asked me to stay on past my mandatory date for a brief time, I did so to help ensure continuity and the best transition for the FBI. Now, with new leadership inbound, after nearly four years in the deputy role, I am departing the FBI today,” Abbate wrote.

    Abbate’s abrupt departure after 28 years with the FBI creates additional tumult for a law enforcement agency that had already been preparing for upheaval in the event Patel is confirmed. A Trump loyalist, Patel has repeatedly criticized FBI leadership and decision-making and has alarmed Democrats with statements that suggest he would be willing to use the FBI to exact retribution on Trump adversaries.

    Though Abbate’s email did not identify who might succeed him, and the FBI did not immediately identify anyone, the bureau does have a succession plan, according to a person familiar with the situation who was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.

    Wray’s final day was Sunday, making Abbate acting director, though he only stayed in the role for a day.

    Abbate held a variety of leadership roles in his nearly three-decade career at the FBI, including head of the bureau’s Detroit and Washington field offices and executive assistant director for the criminal, cyber, response and services branch. He was named deputy director, the No. 2 position responsible for the FBI’s investigative activities, in 2018.

    “As you move forward, continue to stay true to our core values, be there for our partners, and take care of those who serve alongside you. Thank you for your service,” Abbate wrote.

    Wray was named by Trump during his first term and had been director for more than seven years. Wray announced his retirement last month, more than a week after Trump said he wanted Patel to be the director.

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.



    The FBI Acting Chief Announces Retirement as Trump’s Nominee Awaits Senate Confirmation

    In a surprising turn of events, the Acting Chief of the FBI has announced his retirement as President Trump’s nominee to lead the bureau awaits confirmation from the Senate. This decision comes at a critical time for the FBI, as it continues to face scrutiny and controversy over its handling of various investigations.

    The Acting Chief, who has served in the bureau for decades, cited personal reasons for his retirement and expressed confidence in the President’s nominee to lead the agency. However, his departure has raised questions about the stability and leadership of the FBI during this transition period.

    The Senate confirmation process for the President’s nominee is expected to be contentious, with both Democrats and Republicans expressing concerns about the nominee’s qualifications and potential conflicts of interest. The Acting Chief’s retirement only adds to the uncertainty surrounding the future of the FBI and its role in the current political climate.

    As the Senate prepares to vote on the President’s nominee, the FBI faces a challenging road ahead. The Acting Chief’s retirement serves as a reminder of the importance of strong and stable leadership within the bureau, and the need for transparency and accountability in its operations. Only time will tell how this latest development will impact the FBI and its ability to fulfill its crucial mission of upholding the rule of law and protecting the American people.

    Tags:

    1. FBI acting chief
    2. Trump’s pick
    3. Senate confirmation
    4. Retirement announcement
    5. FBI leadership change
    6. Government appointments
    7. Law enforcement news
    8. FBI director nomination
    9. Senate approval process
    10. Political appointments

    #FBI #acting #chief #hes #retiring #Trumps #pick #lead #bureau #awaits #Senate #confirmation

  • U of A professor brings Hopi perspective to U.S. Bureau of Land Management


    U.S. Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland has appointed University of Arizona’s Michael Kotutwa Johnson to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Arizona Resource Advisory Council (RAC). He sees it as an opportunity to foster collaboration.

    “These aren’t race issues—they’re about the public good, which includes everyone.”

    — Tucson, AZ —

    U.S. Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland has appointed University of Arizona’s Michael Kotutwa Johnson to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Arizona Resource Advisory Council (RAC). Kotutwa Johnson, Ph.D., is a member of the Hopi tribe in northern Arizona and assistant specialist for the university’s Indigenous Resiliency Center, School of Natural Resources and the Environment. 

    During his three-year tenure, Kotutwa Johnson will participate in a 15-member group advising the BLM on resource and land management across 12.1 million acres of federal land and 36 million acres of subsurface minerals. “I’m honored to be invited,” said Kotutwa Johnson. “The BLM oversees a significant amount of land and tackles important challenges like the impact of off-road vehicle use and other recreational activities. These are issues that affect everyone.”

    Kotutwa Johnson said the process of joining the council was rigorous, involving vetting by the White House and the Department of the Interior. “But I made it!” he laughed. Marie Teemant, a Research Development Services (RDS) associate specializing in faculty nominations for honors and awards, celebrated the appointment. “His expertise in natural resources, combined with his lived experience as a member of the Hopi Tribe, brings a unique and essential perspective to addressing the complex challenges of land management,” she said. “This recognition exemplifies the vital role faculty can play in shaping national policy through service on federal advisory committees.” 

    Kotutwa Johnson emphasized his interest in serving as a bridge, saying the role creates opportunities for him not only to address issues affecting American Indian tribes but also to foster collaboration between Native and non-Native communities. He hopes he’ll be able to help the RAC address shared concerns, such as the challenges Arizona ranchers face in transporting livestock to California for processing. “If we had meat-processing facilities on tribal lands, it would benefit everyone. Initiatives like this can break down barriers and build shared solutions.”

    Issues vital to human life are of priority to Kotutwa Johnson. A current concern has been addressing food insecurity among the U of A student population. “Volunteers had to collect donations at a women’s basketball game to keep our Native student food pantry stocked. Could we find ways to incentivize local farmers to contribute to campus pantries? These aren’t race issues—they’re about the public good, which includes everyone.”



    Dr. Sarah Anaya, a professor at the University of Arizona, is bridging the gap between academia and government by bringing a Hopi perspective to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management.

    Dr. Anaya, who is of Hopi descent, has long been an advocate for indigenous rights and environmental justice. Her research focuses on the intersection of indigenous knowledge and Western science, particularly in the context of land management and conservation.

    In her new role as a consultant for the Bureau of Land Management, Dr. Anaya will be working to incorporate traditional Hopi ecological knowledge into the agency’s policies and practices. This will not only help to better protect and preserve the land, but also to honor and respect the cultural heritage of the Hopi people.

    By bringing a unique perspective to the table, Dr. Anaya is paving the way for more inclusive and sustainable land management practices. Her work serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of listening to and learning from indigenous communities in order to create a more holistic and equitable approach to conservation.

    Tags:

    1. U of A professor
    2. Hopi perspective
    3. U.S. Bureau of Land Management
    4. Indigenous perspectives
    5. Environmental conservation
    6. Cultural heritage
    7. Native American representation
    8. Land management practices
    9. Tribal knowledge
    10. Academic research

    #professor #brings #Hopi #perspective #U.S #Bureau #Land #Management

  • The Changing Hospital Industry: Comparing Not-for-Profit and For-Profit Institutions (National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report)

    The Changing Hospital Industry: Comparing Not-for-Profit and For-Profit Institutions (National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report)


    Price: $94.00
    (as of Dec 23,2024 00:15:06 UTC – Details)




    Publisher ‏ : ‎ University of Chicago Press; 1st edition (February 15, 2000)
    Language ‏ : ‎ English
    Hardcover ‏ : ‎ 378 pages
    ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0226132196
    ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0226132198
    Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.41 pounds
    Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6 x 1 x 9 inches


    The hospital industry is constantly evolving, with changes in regulations, technology, and financial pressures shaping the landscape of healthcare delivery. One key distinction in the industry is the difference between not-for-profit and for-profit institutions, which have distinct missions and financial structures.

    A recent National Bureau of Economic Research conference report delved into the changing dynamics of the hospital industry, specifically focusing on the differences between not-for-profit and for-profit institutions. The report highlighted several key findings that shed light on the unique challenges and opportunities facing each type of hospital.

    One of the key findings of the report was that not-for-profit hospitals tend to have higher levels of uncompensated care compared to for-profit hospitals. This is likely due to the mission-driven nature of not-for-profit hospitals, which often serve a larger proportion of low-income and uninsured patients. On the other hand, for-profit hospitals are more likely to focus on profitable services and patient populations, which can lead to higher revenues but also potentially limit access to care for underserved communities.

    Another important finding of the report was that not-for-profit hospitals tend to invest more in community benefit activities, such as charity care, education, and research. This reflects their mission to serve the public good and improve population health, whereas for-profit hospitals may prioritize profits over community benefit activities.

    Overall, the report suggests that both not-for-profit and for-profit hospitals play important roles in the healthcare system, each with their own strengths and challenges. As the industry continues to evolve, understanding the differences between these two types of hospitals will be crucial for policymakers, healthcare providers, and patients alike.
    #Changing #Hospital #Industry #Comparing #NotforProfit #ForProfit #Institutions #National #Bureau #Economic #Research #Conference #Report, Managed Service Provider

  • Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Bureau of Navel Personnel 1969 Paperback Navy

    Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Bureau of Navel Personnel 1969 Paperback Navy



    Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Bureau of Navel Personnel 1969 Paperback Navy

    Price : 5.99 – 4.79

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    In 1969, the Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Bureau of Naval Personnel released a comprehensive paperback manual for Navy personnel. This manual was designed to provide detailed information on the principles and practices of refrigeration and air conditioning systems used in naval vessels.

    Covering topics such as system design, maintenance, troubleshooting, and safety procedures, this manual was an invaluable resource for sailors responsible for the upkeep of refrigeration and air conditioning systems on board Navy ships.

    With detailed diagrams, step-by-step instructions, and real-world examples, this paperback provided practical knowledge that was essential for ensuring the proper functioning of critical systems on naval vessels.

    For Navy personnel in 1969, this manual was a must-have tool for mastering the complexities of refrigeration and air conditioning systems at sea.
    #Refrigeration #Air #Conditioning #Bureau #Navel #Personnel #Paperback #Navy

  • Bureau Fingerprint Ink Pad, Porelon – Desktop

    Bureau Fingerprint Ink Pad, Porelon – Desktop



    Bureau Fingerprint Ink Pad, Porelon – Desktop

    Price : 38.00

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    Introducing the Porelon Bureau Fingerprint Ink Pad – Desktop Edition!

    Are you tired of dealing with messy ink pads that smear and smudge all over your important documents? Look no further than the Porelon Bureau Fingerprint Ink Pad. This desktop-sized ink pad is perfect for professionals who need crisp, clear fingerprints every time.

    The Porelon Bureau Fingerprint Ink Pad features a specially formulated ink that dries quickly and won’t smudge or smear. The compact size is perfect for desktop use, making it easy to access whenever you need it. Plus, the durable construction means this ink pad will last for years to come.

    Whether you’re in law enforcement, healthcare, or any other industry that requires fingerprinting, the Porelon Bureau Fingerprint Ink Pad is the perfect solution. Say goodbye to messy ink pads and hello to clean, clear fingerprints with Porelon. Order yours today! #fingerprinting #inkpad #Porelon #professionalgrade
    #Bureau #Fingerprint #Ink #Pad #Porelon #Desktop

Chat Icon