People who bought event tickets through Ticketmaster in 2018 are now eligible for compensation.
A $6-million settlement that could see around a million Canadians eligible for a credit with Ticketmaster was finalized last week at Regina’s Court of King’s Bench.
The lawsuit, launched by plaintiff Crystal Watch, took Ticketmaster to court for hiding the prices of ticket fees in 2018. Ticketmaster refused to agree to any wrongdoing on their part, but the case never went to trial and the company agreed to settle.
The suit was overseen by Justice Graeme Mitchell. He wrote in the published decision that affected customers are eligible to receive up to $45 in Ticketmaster credit to be used toward future ticket purchases. The credit is transferable, but can only be used once.
Watch, who acted as the representative plaintiff, received an honorarium of $25,000, paid from the settlement amount.
The settlement was finazlized at Regina’s Court of King’s Bench on Jan. 15. (Chris Edwards/CBC)
The class action case claimed that Ticketmaster engaged in unfair “drip pricing,” where unnecessary fees outside the regular ticket price were deceptively added to the total price. The lawsuit said this breached The Consumer Protection and Business Practices Act.
In order to be eligible, customers need to have purchased tickets through Ticketmaster for Canadian events between Jan. 1 and June 30, 2018. Customers in Quebec and any Ticketmaster employees aren’t eligible for compensation.
Regina lawyer Tony Merchant, whose firm represented the plaintiffs, previously said he believes up to 100,000 people in Saskatchewan and about a million people across Canada could be eligible for a credit.
Eligible Ticketmaster users should get an email shortly from Ticketmaster with a link to receive their credit.
If a Ticketmaster user who is eligible for credit doesn’t receive it, Merchant said they can contact his firm.
How the money is being distributed
The lawsuit resulted in a $6-million settlement, out of which lawyers will take $1,725,000 in fees due to the case being a class action lawsuit. This will leave Ticketmaster users with $4.3-million to be distributed between people affected.
“While this case does not involve a mega-settlement, it has proved to be a legitimate consumer protection lawsuit which could only have been viably prosecuted as a class action,” the judge said in a written decision. “Class counsel deserve an economic incentive for pursuing this claim to its successful resolution.”
Ticketmaster, the popular ticket-selling platform, has reached a class-action settlement in Canada that will reimburse 1 million Canadians for deceptive fees. The settlement, which was approved by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, will see Ticketmaster refund customers for fees that were not clearly disclosed at the time of purchase.
The lawsuit alleged that Ticketmaster misled customers by charging hidden fees on top of advertised ticket prices, leading to inflated costs for consumers. The settlement will see Ticketmaster issue refunds to eligible customers who purchased tickets between October 1, 2013, and June 23, 2019. Customers who are eligible for refunds will receive an email notification with instructions on how to claim their reimbursement.
This class-action settlement is a victory for Canadian consumers who have been subjected to deceptive practices by Ticketmaster. It serves as a reminder to companies that they must be transparent about fees and charges to ensure a fair and honest purchasing experience for customers.
If you believe you are eligible for a refund as part of this settlement, be sure to keep an eye on your email for further instructions on how to claim your reimbursement. Let this be a lesson to all companies that deceptive practices will not go unnoticed or unpunished.
Tags:
Ticketmaster, class-action settlement, reimburse, 1 million Canadians, deceptive fees, lawsuit, compensation, legal action, refund, consumer rights
Meanwhile, Marco Odermatt’s (SUI/Stöckli) wait for victory in the Hahnenkamm continues. A day after powering to victory in the Super G, the man who has won just about everything else in Alpine skiing made a couple of small but critical mistakes in the Steilhang – the most technically demanding section down the Streif. That left the Wengen and Val Gardena winner 0.55 seconds behind Crawford, down in sixth position.
And after a difficult season so far, it was a case of so near yet so far for the hometown challenge. Roared on by the 50,000-plus crowd, Daniel Hemetsberger (AUT/Fischer) looked to have grabbed his first podium in three years, and Austria’s first in the Downhill all season. But Crawford’s brilliance dropped the Fischer skier into fourth, leaving a host of Austria’s most famous ski fans – led by Arnold Schwarzenegger – shaking their heads.
Crawford finally converts
Arnie though will no doubt be back, after an extraordinary day of high-speed racing. But despite a host of the world’s finest putting in compelling performances, it was Crawford, the reigning Super G world champion but never a World Cup winner in any discipline, who takes the headlines.
“It’s been a dream of mine to win the classics,” said Crawford, who arrived in Kitzbühel with three podiums but no victories in his 52 previous World Cup Downhill starts.
It was a historic day in Kitzbühel as Canadian skier Jack Crawford claimed his first World Cup victory in the men’s downhill event, stunning the competition and delighting fans around the world.
Crawford’s win was particularly special as he became the first Canadian to win the prestigious downhill race in Kitzbühel in over 30 years. The 24-year-old put on a flawless performance on the notorious Streif course, navigating the treacherous terrain with precision and speed.
The victory was even more remarkable as it came amidst a strong showing from the Swiss team, who had dominated the event in recent years. Despite the stiff competition, Crawford held his nerve and crossed the finish line in a time of 1:55.58, securing the top spot on the podium.
For Crawford, the win was a dream come true and a testament to his hard work and dedication to the sport. Speaking after the race, he expressed his gratitude and joy at finally breaking through and claiming his first World Cup victory.
“It’s an incredible feeling to have it happen in Kitzbühel,” Crawford said. “This is a race that every skier dreams of winning, and to do it in front of such an amazing crowd is truly special.”
While Crawford’s victory was the highlight of the day, it was not without its share of drama as several Canadian skiers crashed out of the race. Despite the setbacks, Crawford’s win was a shining moment for Canadian skiing and a reminder of the talent and determination of the country’s athletes.
As the celebrations continued in Kitzbühel, Crawford’s win was a reminder of the thrill of victory and the unpredictable nature of downhill skiing. With the World Championships on the horizon, Crawford’s triumph has set the stage for an exciting season ahead.
Candidates for president of the United States address many issues on the campaign trail as they criss-cross the country pitching their policy agendas.
The economy, health care and immigration were among the leading topics in the runup to the 2024 election. However, it’s uncommon for a candidate to talk about the availability of water. But that’s what then-candidate and now president-elect Donald Trump did last September while speaking in water-needy California.
He referenced a “large faucet” in British Columbia, Canada that could be turned on to bring water to California. Millions of gallons of water would flow from Canadian snowcaps, Trump said, without providing supporting information or a mention of how Canada might see the venture.
Trump’s brazen statement did not go unnoticed by Canada’s Maude Barlow, who has a long career working to preserve and protect water, as an advocate for water justice.
Barlow was a senior adviser to the president of the United Nations General Assembly, and in 2010 was widely recognized as the driving force behind the U.N.’s declaration of water as a human right. In 2014, Barlow led a convoy from Windsor, Ontario to Detroit, Michigan to deliver water to residents whose water was shut off for the inability to pay.
A prolific author, her 2019 book, Whose Water Is It, Anyway? makes the case for keeping control of water in public hands.
Should Trump’s “large faucet” statement be dismissed as campaign rhetoric or taken seriously?
“Trump’s statement should not be dismissed, especially with the fact that since making it, Trump has talked about annexing Canada as the 51st state and said Canada’s resources plus U.S. military strength would make a great combination,” Barlow said.
Canadians are taking Trump’s desire for Canada’s water seriously, according to Barlow, who added in the 1980s there were discussions about exporting water from Canada, and they were not well received. Plus, conservation allies in the U.S. were opposed to taking Canada’s water, saying it’s important to live within our given water resources, said Barlow.
Canadians tend to be generous, according to Barlow, and would share water when needed. But when it comes to commercial export of water, “there will be fierce reactions from Canadians of all stripes,” she said. “Even people not particularly interested in politics.”
Political uncertainty
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau recently announced he will step down in March, meaning Canadians will have new leadership that must manage the relationship with the U.S. and Trump. That includes, in addition to the potential export of water, Trump’s threats of a 25% tariff on Canadian exports, and his aggressive statements — such as referring to Canada as the 51st state.
Great Lakes Now asked Barlow how a new government in Ottawa might react to Trump’s pitch for water. Barlow reiterated that “people on the street, be they on the left or right politically, don’t want our water sold for export.”
But she expressed mistrust of the potential leading Conservative candidate for Prime Minister, Pierre Poilievre, who Barlow said isn’t talking about the issue. And Barlow is also fearful that the business community might offer up Canada’s resources to ward off the threat of tariffs.
“I have no faith that the business community and this Conservative Party will refrain from offering up Canadian water,” Barlow said.
Courtesy: Council of Canadians
Maude Barlow, author of Whose Water Is It, Anyway?: Taking water protection into public hands
Global perspective
Based on her U.N. tenure, Barlow said water can be a source of conflict, including violence.
“However, water can be a source of peace, where we acknowledge disagreements but where we come together,” Barlow said.
For a broader perspective on water relations between the U.S. and Canada, Great Lakes Now asked water executive Rob Sisson to comment on President-elect Trump’s desire for Canadian water.
Sisson, a Republican, served as a Trump appointee to the International Joint Commission (IJC) from 2019-2024. The IJC consists of U.S. and Canadian commissioners and advises the two countries on transboundary water policy.
Sisson approached the issue from a global perspective.
California is the fifth largest agricultural producer in the world and is reliant on irrigation to meet water demands, according to Sisson.
“It is a matter of national security, food security and human health that we find a path forward to ensure water security there,” Sisson told Great Lakes Now.
And Sisson sounded the alarm on the potential for water scarcity in other regions of North America, including the Great Lakes.
“Water scarcity, which has been a life-threatening issue in Asia and Africa, now looms over us,” Sisson said. “We need the best and brightest minds in science, engineering and diplomacy tackling the problem.”
We are family
Great Lakes Now asked Barlow for her advice as the political issues play out for people in the Great Lakes region. Advice for cities like Ottawa, Detroit and Chicago or water justice communities like Benton Harbor and Flint and Indigenous communities like the Six Nations in Ontario.
“Remember that we are family,” Barlow said.
She added that there isn’t a thing that happens in the U.S. that Canadians don’t care about.
“We are connected in history, geography and our shared cultures. We have differences certainly but we have so much more in common,” Barlow said.
In a recent statement, former President Donald Trump caused a stir among Canadians by declaring that the United States has the “best water in the world” and suggesting that Canada should pay for access to it.
Many Canadians were quick to criticize Trump’s bold claim, pointing out that Canada is home to some of the largest freshwater reserves in the world and has been a leader in sustainable water management practices. Others saw the statement as yet another example of Trump’s brash and confrontational style.
Despite the controversy, Trump’s remarks seemed to have a unifying effect on Canadians, with many taking to social media to express their pride in their country’s natural resources and commitment to environmental conservation.
In the end, Trump’s aggressive water statement may have inadvertently strengthened the bond between Canadians, reminding them of the importance of protecting their water resources for future generations.
Canadian investor and “Shark Tank” star Kevin O’Leary said Thursday that he wants to help broker a deal with President-elect Donald Trump that would create some sort of “economic union” between the US and Canada – declaring that at least half of his countrymen would support such a merger.
O’Leary’s interest in unifying the US and Canada comes after Trump, 78, has repeatedly suggested in recent weeks that Canada should become “our 51st State.”
“Canadians over the holidays – the last two days – have been talking about this,” O’Leary said of Trump’s proposal, during an interview with Fox Business. “They want to hear more.”
O’Leary indicated that he will travel to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate to discuss his proposal to merge Canada with the US. Gustavo Caballero/CNBC
The Montreal-born businessman acknowledged “there’s obviously a lot of issues” that would arise if Canada attempted to join the US but said Trump’s interest in the matter “could be the beginning of an economic union.”
“Think about the power of combining the two economies, erasing the border between Canada and the United States and putting all that resource up to the northern borders where China and Russia are knocking on the door,” O’Leary continued.
“So secure [the northern territories], give a common currency, figure out taxes across the board, get everything trading both ways, create a new, almost EU-like passport – I like this idea and at least half of Canadians are interested,” he asserted.
O’Leary, 70, noted that a major impediment right now is the “collapsing” Canadian government under Liberal Party Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who is very likely to resign or be voted out of office by October 2025.
Trump — who thinks Canada has been ripping off the US over trade — has been taunting Trudeau for weeks by referring to Canada as a prospective US “state” and the prime minister as its “governor.”
Trump reportedly suggested to Justin Trudeau that Canada should join the United States, noting that he could be “governor” of Canada. APTrump has threatened to impose new tariffs on Canada when he takes office next month. AP
“Nobody wants Trudeau to negotiate this deal,” O’Leary argued. “I don’t want him doing it for me. So I’m going to go to Mar-A-Lago. I’ll start the narrative.”
“The 41 million Canadians, I think most of them would trust me on this deal.”
In a Christmas Day Truth Social Post, Trump argued that Canada should become a US state because the taxes of its citizens “are far too high.”
The president-elect declared that “if Canada was to become our 51st State, their Taxes would be cut by more than 60%.”
Trump also asserted that Canadian businesses also “would immediately double in size, and they would be militarily protected like no other Country anywhere in the World” if the Great White North was to join the US.
In a recent interview, ‘Shark Tank’ star Kevin O’Leary made a controversial statement claiming that half of Canadians actually support President Trump’s proposal for Canada to join the United States. O’Leary, known for his outspoken opinions and business acumen, argued that merging Canada with the US would bring economic benefits and strengthen both countries’ positions on the global stage.
While O’Leary’s remarks have sparked debate and criticism from many Canadians who staunchly oppose the idea of joining the US, his comments highlight the growing divide within the country over its relationship with its southern neighbor. As tensions between Canada and the US continue to escalate, O’Leary’s statement serves as a reminder of the complex political landscape that both countries navigate.
What are your thoughts on Kevin O’Leary’s statement? Do you believe that Canada should consider joining the US, or do you think it’s an unrealistic and impractical proposal? Share your opinions in the comments below. #SharkTank #KevinOLeary #CanadaUSRelations
Tags:
Shark Tank, Kevin O’Leary, Canada, United States, Trump, proposal, politics, international relations, Canadian opinions, merger, North America, trade relations, government, news.
Punta Cana, DR.- Nearly 98% of hotel rooms in Bávaro, Punta Cana, and Cap Cana are currently occupied by international tourists, with some hotels fully booked, according to a report published by Recorriendo con Salvador. The findings, based on research conducted in collaboration with local tourism clusters and hotel associations, reflect the region’s popularity during the holiday season.
The report highlights that between December 31, 2024, and January 2, 2025, the overwhelming majority of the 44,000 hotel rooms in the area—excluding Airbnb accommodations—are being filled by visitors from Canada, the United States and Europe. Additionally, emerging markets such as Argentina and Colombia are contributing to the strong demand.
This surge in tourism coincides with winter in many of these countries, as travelers seek refuge in the warm climate and idyllic beaches of the Dominican Republic. Bávaro, Punta Cana and Cap Cana continue to stand out as top choices for sun-seekers during the colder months.
The Dominican Republic’s thriving tourism sector not only underscores its status as a premier global destination but also serves as a significant driver of the national economy. The influx of international visitors supports job creation and bolsters local businesses, reinforcing the region’s reputation for world-class hospitality and amenities.
According to a recent study, Canadians, Europeans, and Americans make up 98% of the guests staying at hotels in popular tourist destinations such as Punta Cana, Cap Cana, and Bávaro in the Dominican Republic.
This data highlights the high demand for these tropical getaways among travelers from North America and Europe. It also emphasizes the diverse range of nationalities that flock to these stunning beachfront resorts for their vacations.
With pristine beaches, luxurious accommodations, and a wide variety of activities and amenities, it’s no wonder that these destinations are top choices for tourists seeking a relaxing and enjoyable holiday experience.
Whether you’re looking to soak up the sun, indulge in delicious cuisine, or simply unwind in paradise, Punta Cana, Cap Cana, and Bávaro offer something for everyone. So why not join the thousands of Canadians, Europeans, and Americans who have already discovered the beauty and hospitality of these stunning Dominican destinations?
Tags:
Canadians in Punta Cana
Europeans in Cap Cana
Americans in Bávaro
Hotel occupancy in Punta Cana
Popular tourist destinations in the Dominican Republic
OTTAWA—Every day, just before sunset, 33-year-old Ryan Hemsley heads to Clover Point, a scenic stretch along the southern coast of Vancouver Island in British Columbia, Canada’s westernmost province. When the weather is clear, he can look across the Strait of Juan de Fuca and see the Olympic Mountains in Washington State.
“Subconsciously, there’s something that keeps bringing me here every day,” Hemsley told me. Watching the Seattle ferry return to the U.S., his thoughts drift to an unlikely fantasy.
“How can I be a stowaway so I can be an American?” he said.
Hemsley insists he has no intention of crossing the border illegally. But when president-elect Donald Trump recently referred to the “great state of Canada,” while trolling Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as a “governor,” and claiming that “many Canadians want Canada to become the 51st state,” it struck a nerve.
Canada’s top officials universally said Trump was joking. Hemsley, on the other hand, saw potential. Recently, he said, his country has become stagnant, a place where ambition dies and potential is squandered. Despite earning a decent living as a car salesman, he can’t afford to buy a house or plan for a future.
“You wake up and survive,” he said. “There’s no opportunity for growth. You occasionally go out for dinner with friends, have a good night, but then you go home, sleep, and do it all over again.”
“As much as I love Canada,” he said, “Canada becoming the 51st state of the United States would rejuvenate me.”
“Canada becoming the 51st state of the United States would rejuvenate me.” (Rick Collins for The Free Press)
For Canadians like Hemsley, Trump’s remarks have reignited a centuries-old debate, stretching at least as far back as Calixa Lavallée, the French Canadian composer who wrote the music for “O Canada,” fought in the American Civil War, and thought Quebec should be part of the United States. A recent poll found that 13 percent of Canadians favor becoming America’s 51st state. Among supporters of the country’s Conservative Party, that number rises to 21 percent. In the western province of Alberta, support stands at 19 percent. Those figures are far from a majority, but how many Americans would even consider becoming Canadian? It’s almost unthinkable.
I spoke to a dozen Canadians who said they were ready to pay fealty to Uncle Sam. Barbara Murphy, 75, who lives on a farm in Milton, Ontario, and runs a pottery business, was one of them.
“I wouldn’t fight for Canada because no one fights for it. Canadians are a kept people,” Murphy told me. “They have no idea who they are.”
Murphy agrees with Trudeau, who famously said that Canada is the world’s first “post-national state,” with no “core identity.”
“We don’t celebrate our culture like the Americans because we’re embarrassed by it,” she added.
Combine that sentiment with dissatisfaction over the national economy and you can see why some Canucks would prefer to be U.S. citizens. Average income per person in Canada is 73 percent of the U.S. level, and the country’s economy has been largely flat for a decade. Despite recent worries about inflation, the U.S. economy, in contrast, has been growing steadily for 15 years except for 2020, when much of the country shut down at the height of the pandemic.
“My grandchildren would have far more opportunities than they do in this country. My 16-year-old grandson can’t even get an entry-level job at a Tim Hortons,” Murphy told me, referring to Canada’s ubiquitous coffee chain.
Many Canadian malcontents also expressed dissatisfaction with the outsize role of their country’s government. The federal government is Canada’s largest employer and accounts for 40 percent of the economy. In the U.S., government spending has accounted for about a quarter of the gross domestic product since 1900, although it exploded during the pandemic, reaching a high of 47 percent in 2020.
“It’s almost as if what the government wants is for people to be totally dependent upon them in every facet of their lives,” LisaMarie Nicholson, 56, who recently retired from a job as an executive assistant for a major bank, told me. “They want to be able to give you the handout so you don’t feel that you can take care of yourself. They want to be able to control the medical system so that you are at their mercy when you’re not well. They want to be able to tell you what to do and when to do it and how to do it. And there’s a big component of this country who wants that.”
“If Canada were to become the 51st state, I wouldn’t protest it too much,” Taylor Simone, 32, told The Free Press. (Kyrani Kanavaros for The Free Press)
Taylor Simone, 32, a film and television professional from Vancouver, who makes ends meet working as a server and manager at a restaurant, agrees. “If Canada were to become the 51st state, I wouldn’t protest it too much,” she told me. “If I had the economic ability to buy a house in Canada, I would never have come to this point.”
Noah Meyer-Delouya, 27, who is originally from Ottawa, and moved to New York this year to work for a start-up as an accountant, seconded that. “Canada right now is like a super-old dog that can’t walk,” he told me. “You want to put it out of its misery because it’s functioning so poorly in so many ways. Canada would be better off currently as the 51st state and I say that with a lot of sadness and disappointment.”
Like many Jewish Canadians, Meyer-Delouya believes that antisemitism is worse in Canada than in the U.S. Despite the small size of the Jewish community in Canada, Israel’s Ministry for Diaspora Affairs and Combating Antisemitism found a 670 percent increase in antisemitic incidents there since the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023. “The Jewish community is more embedded in the fabric of American society,” Meyer-Delouya said. “I just automatically feel safer being in the U.S.”
Meanwhile, Kori Anstey, 48, from Temiskaming Shores, Ontario, said she felt “terrified” in 2022 when the government cracked down on truckers in Ottawa protesting Covid vaccine requirements. Her husband was unvaccinated and lost his job at a construction company as a result. “The authoritarianism that crept in has taken over. Canadians are afraid to speak up. Becoming the 51st state would mean we would at least get the First Amendment because free speech is ultimate freedom for me,” she said.
Nicholson said her husband, who had worked for the city of Toronto for 20 years, was fired after he refused to take a Covid vaccine. Afterward, they moved to Lethbridge, Alberta, hoping it would be a place with fewer restrictions and closer in ethos to the U.S.
“I didn’t always like Americans,” Nicholson admitted to me. “We were taught to think Americans were rude and obnoxious and full of themselves. But now my thinking has completely changed, because what I see down there when I spend time there is that there is a real pride about being an American. They have pride in who they are and what they stand for, and they really do believe in freedom, and they’re willing to stand up and die for that.
“What is Canada anymore? Can anybody define it for me?” she asked.
Both the U.S. and Canada were once British colonies. But while the U.S. was born through revolution, Canada began its road toward independence through an act of British Parliament in 1867. Not a single shot was fired. Since then, Canada has prioritized “peace, order, and good government” (a phrase from the country’s founding document) rather than the American credo of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”
And many of the people I spoke with longed for a Canada that is less polite and more proactive, more ambitious, and less constrained. “The Americans are revolutionary people. They fought for their freedoms. They will tear shit down if it’s bad and build it back up. We don’t. We patch, patch, patch,” Murphy told me.
Even Stockwell Day—who served as minister of public safety in the cabinet of Stephen Harper, Canada’s last Conservative prime minister until he was defeated by Trudeau’s Liberal Party in 2015—understands why his compatriots want to defect.
Day, who was invited to Trump’s first inauguration in 2017, told me he’s heard “chatter” from sources in Washington, D.C., that Trump might offer native-born Canadians a crack at American citizenship, and he thinks such an offer would have a lot of takers. “People are tired. They are despairing that the political scene might not change significantly enough that the long-term prospect of staying in Canada looks positive,” he said.
Trump’s comments even seem to have given the independence movement in Quebec a new impetus. While the separatists’ preferred alternative is a fully independent nation of Quebec, some haven’t ruled out a merger with the U.S.
Philippe Boileau, 59, a chemist and consulting scientist who lives in Thetford Mines, Quebec, is a committed separatist with deep roots in the movement. When I asked him why citizens of French-speaking Quebec would want to be absorbed into the United States, he told me he wanted to “be rid of the Anglo supremacists in English-speaking Canada.”
“States in the U.S. have much more power than provinces within Canada,” Boileau added.
Canada has prioritized “peace, order, and good government” (a phrase from the country’s founding document) rather than the American credo of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” (Rick Collins for The Free Press)
When I spoke to Ryan Hemsley on the phone, he texted me a photo from Clover Point. It was a little too cloudy for a clear picture of the setting sun.
“I’ve lost all hope for Canada,” he said, getting emotional. “If Trump were to say you’ve got 24 hours of amnesty, whoever gets here, gets here, I’m telling you, I’m not even bringing my car. I’m swimming across.”
In a surprising turn of events, a group of Canadians have come forward with a bold statement: “Trump, Take My Country—Please!” These individuals, fed up with the current state of affairs in Canada, have expressed a desire for US President Donald Trump to take over their country.
While some may find this sentiment shocking, those who support this idea cite reasons such as a lack of strong leadership in Canada, economic struggles, and a desire for a more decisive leader like Trump. They believe that under Trump’s leadership, Canada could become a more powerful and prosperous nation.
Of course, there are many who vehemently oppose this idea, seeing Trump’s policies and rhetoric as divisive and harmful. They argue that Canada should focus on improving itself from within, rather than looking to an outsider for solutions.
Regardless of where you stand on this controversial issue, one thing is clear: the Canadians who say “Trump, Take My Country—Please!” are certainly making a bold statement. What do you think of this surprising sentiment? Let us know in the comments.