Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: Conflicts
Roger Goodell: Tom Brady is “incredibly cooperative” avoiding Fox and Raiders conflicts
NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell says Tom Brady has done everything asked of him by the league in balancing his responsibilities as Fox’s No. 1 game commentator and a minority owner of the Raiders.
“Tom has been incredibly cooperative. He calls frequently about it and says, ‘Am I doing OK?’” Goodell said. “I think he’s serious that he separates the two and doesn’t put the league or anyone in a position of conflict.”
But the mere fact that Brady has to frequently call the league and ask if he’s doing OK shows that his situation is far outside the norm. Other team owners and game commentators don’t have to ask that question because they haven’t had special rules implemented for them the way Brady has.
Goodell reiterated that Brady, like every owner, is subject to the league’s tampering policy.
“Everybody in the National Football League, owners and personnel, is still subject to tampering rules,” Goodell said. “Everyone is responsible for his conduct and they’re held accountable.”
Goodell left room for the possibility that the policies on what Brady may and may not do could be changed this offseason. He did not say what changes are being considered.
In a recent interview, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell had high praise for quarterback Tom Brady, calling him “incredibly cooperative” when it comes to avoiding conflicts with Fox and the Las Vegas Raiders.Goodell commended Brady for his professionalism and willingness to work with the league and its broadcast partners to ensure there are no scheduling conflicts that could impact game broadcasts. He also noted that Brady has been a great ambassador for the league and a strong advocate for the game of football.
With the Tampa Bay Buccaneers set to face off against the Raiders in Las Vegas this season, Brady’s cooperation has been instrumental in ensuring that the game can go ahead without any issues. Goodell expressed his gratitude to Brady for his flexibility and cooperation in navigating the challenges of the NFL schedule.
Overall, Goodell’s comments highlight the positive impact that Brady has had on the league and his commitment to helping the NFL succeed. As one of the most successful and respected players in the history of the game, Brady’s leadership both on and off the field continues to set an example for his fellow players and fans alike.
Tags:
Roger Goodell, Tom Brady, NFL, cooperation, Fox, Raiders, conflict avoidance, NFL commissioner, quarterback, sports news, NFL controversy, NFL players, football, player discipline, NFL teams, sports industry, media relations, NFL drama
#Roger #Goodell #Tom #Brady #incredibly #cooperative #avoiding #Fox #Raiders #conflictsBiden says he’s leaving Trump with a ‘strong hand to play’ in world conflicts
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden said Monday that his stewardship of American foreign policy has left the U.S. safer and economically more secure, arguing that President-elect Donald Trump will inherit a nation viewed as stronger and more reliable than it was four years ago.
Biden trumpeted his administration’s work on expanding NATO, rallying allies to provide Ukraine with military aid to fight Russia and bolstering American chip manufacturing to better compete with China during a wide-ranging speech to reflect on his foreign policy legacy a week before ceding the White House to Trump.
Biden’s case for his achievements will be shadowed and shaped, at least in the near term, by the messy counterfactual that American voters once again turned to Trump and his protectionist worldview. And he will leave office at a turbulent moment for the globe, with a series of conflicts raging.
“Thanks to our administration, the United States is winning the worldwide competition compared to four years ago,” Biden said in his address at the State Department. “America is stronger. Our alliances are stronger. Our adversaries and competitors are weaker. We have not gone to war to make these things happen.”
The one-term Democrat took office in the throes of the worst global pandemic in a century, and his plans to repair alliances strained by four years of Trump’s “America First” worldview were quickly stress-tested by international crises: the chaotic U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, and Hamas’ brutal 2023 attack on Israel that triggered the war in the Middle East.
Biden argued that he provided a steady hand when the world needed it most. He was tested by war, calamity and miscalculation.
“My administration is leaving the next administration with a very strong hand to play,” Biden said. “America is once again leading.”
Trump, hours after the remarks, said Biden had overseen “a terrible four years” in American foreign policy.
“When you look at what happened, during this last four-year period, I think it was the lowest point in the history of our country,” Trump said in a Newsmax interview. “It’s been so bad.”
Chaotic US exit from Afghanistan was an early setback for Biden
With the U.S. completing its 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan, Biden fulfilled a campaign promise to wind down America’s longest war.
But the 20-year conflict ended in disquieting fashion: The U.S.-backed Afghan government collapsed, a grisly bombing killed 13 U.S. troops and 170 others, and thousands of desperate Afghans descended on Kabul’s airport in search of a way out before the final U.S. aircraft departed over the Hindu Kush.
The Afghanistan debacle was a major setback just eight months into Biden’s presidency that he struggled to recover from.
“Ending the war was the right thing to do, and I believe history will reflect that,” Biden said. “Critics said if we ended the war, it would damage our alliances and create threats to our homeland from foreign-directed terrorism out of a safe haven in Afghanistan — neither has occurred.”
Biden’s Republican detractors, including Trump, cast it as a signal moment in a failed presidency.
“I’ll tell you what happened, he was so bad with Afghanistan, it was such a horrible embarrassment, most embarrassing moment in the history of our country,” Trump said in his lone 2024 presidential debate with Biden, just weeks before the Democrat announced he was ending his reelection campaign.
Biden’s legacy in Ukraine may hinge on Trump’s approach going forward
With Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Biden rallied allies in Europe and beyond to provide Ukraine with billions in military and economic assistance — including more than $100 billion from the U.S. alone. That allowed Kyiv to stay in the fight with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s vastly bigger and better-equipped military.
Biden’s team also coordinated with allies to hit Russia with a steady stream of sanctions aimed at isolating the Kremlin and making Moscow pay an economic price for prosecuting its war.
Biden on Monday marveled that at the start of the war Putin thought Russian forces would easily defeat Ukraine in a matter of days. It was an assessment U.S. and European intelligence officials shared.
Instead, Biden said his administration and its allies have “laid the foundation” for the Trump administration to help Ukraine eventually arrive at a moment where it can negotiate a just end to the nearly three-year old conflict.
“Today, Ukraine is still a free and independent country with the potential for a bright future,” Biden said.
Trump has criticized the cost of the war to U.S. taxpayers and has vowed to bring the conflict to a quick end.
White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan made the case that Trump, a billionaire real estate developer, should consider the backing of Ukraine through the prism of a dealmaker.
“Donald Trump has built his identity around making deals, and the way you make a good deal is with leverage,” Sullivan said in an interview. “Our case publicly and privately to the incoming team is build the leverage, show the staying power, back Ukraine, and it is down that path that lies a good deal.”
Biden’s Mideast diplomacy shadowed by devastation of Gaza
In the Middle East, Biden has stood by Israel as it has worked to root out Hamas from Gaza. That war spawned another in Lebanon, where Israel has mauled Iran’s most powerful ally, Hezbollah, even as Israel has launched successful airstrikes openly inside of Iran for the first time.
The degradation of Hezbollah in turn played a role when Islamist-led rebels last month ousted longtime Syrian leader Bashar Assad, a brutal fixture of Iran’s “Axis of Resistance.”
“Iran is weaker than it’s been in decades,” Biden said.
Biden’s relationship with Israel’s conservative leader Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been strained by the enormous Palestinian death toll in the fighting —now standing at more than 46,000 dead — and Israel’s blockade of the territory, which has left much of Gaza a hellscape where access to food and basic health care is severely limited.
Pro-Palestinian activists have demanded an arms embargo against Israel, but U.S. policy has largely remained unchanged. The State Department in recent days informed Congress of a planned $8 billion weapons sale to Israel.
Aaron David Miller, a former State Department Middle East negotiator, said the approach has put Iran on its heels, but Biden will pay a reputational cost for the devastation of Gaza.
“The administration was either unable or unwilling to create any sort of restraint that normal humans would regard as significant pressure,” Miller said. “It was beyond Joe Biden’s emotional and political bandwidth to impose the kinds of sustained or significant pressures that might have led to a change in Israeli tactics.”
More than 15 months after the Hamas-led attack that prompted the war, around 98 hostages remain in Gaza. More than a third of those are presumed dead by Israeli authorities.
Biden’s Middle East adviser Brett McGurk is in the Middle East, looking to complete an elusive hostage and ceasefire deal as time runs out in the presidency.
“We are on the brink of a proposal that I laid out in detail months ago finally coming to fruition,” Biden said.
Trump, for his part, is warning that “all hell” will be unleashed on Hamas if the hostages aren’t freed by Inauguration Day.
Sullivan declined to comment on Trump’s threats to Hamas, but offered that the two sides are in agreement about the most important thing: getting a deal done.
“Having alignment of the outgoing and incoming administration that a hostage deal at the earliest possible opportunity is in the American national interest,” he said. “Having unity of message on that is a good thing, and we have closely coordinated with the incoming team to this effect.”
In a recent press conference, President-elect Joe Biden stated that he believes he is leaving President Trump with a “strong hand to play” in world conflicts. Despite their political differences, Biden expressed confidence in Trump’s ability to handle international issues and continue to make progress on diplomacy and national security.Biden’s remarks come as the transition of power begins and tensions remain high in several global hotspots, including Iran, North Korea, and China. The President-elect emphasized the importance of a smooth transition and cooperation between his administration and the outgoing Trump administration to ensure a seamless handover of power.
While Biden acknowledged that he and Trump may not always see eye-to-eye on foreign policy matters, he expressed optimism that the United States will remain a strong and influential player on the world stage. He also stressed the need for unity and bipartisan cooperation in addressing the complex challenges facing the nation and the world.
As the Biden administration prepares to take office in January, all eyes will be on how President-elect Biden and President Trump navigate the delicate balance of power in global affairs and work together to ensure a smooth transition of leadership.
Tags:
- Biden administration
- Foreign policy
- World conflicts
- Trump administration
- International relations
- United States politics
- Global diplomacy
- Joe Biden
- Donald Trump
- International affairs
#Biden #hes #leaving #Trump #strong #hand #play #world #conflicts
ART AND ITS INSTITUTIONS: CURRENT CONFLICTS, CRITIQUE AND By Nina Montmann Mint
ART AND ITS INSTITUTIONS: CURRENT CONFLICTS, CRITIQUE AND By Nina Montmann Mint
Price : 85.49
Ends on : N/A
View on eBay
The relationship between art and its institutions has always been a complex one, fraught with tensions and conflicts. In recent years, however, these tensions have come to the forefront of the art world, with artists, curators, and critics alike questioning the role of institutions in shaping and defining contemporary art.In my upcoming book, ART AND ITS INSTITUTIONS: CURRENT CONFLICTS, CRITIQUE AND, I delve into these issues, exploring the ways in which institutions both support and constrain artistic practice. From the impact of funding sources on artistic freedom to the ways in which museums and galleries shape our understanding of art history, I examine the ways in which institutions can be both gatekeepers and enablers of artistic expression.
Drawing on interviews with artists, curators, and museum directors, as well as my own experiences working in the art world, I offer a nuanced and critical perspective on the role of institutions in shaping the contemporary art landscape. By shining a light on the conflicts and contradictions inherent in the relationship between art and its institutions, I hope to spark a much-needed conversation about how we can create more inclusive and equitable spaces for artistic expression.
Stay tuned for updates on the release of ART AND ITS INSTITUTIONS: CURRENT CONFLICTS, CRITIQUE AND, and join me in exploring the complex and evolving relationship between art and its institutions.
#ART #INSTITUTIONS #CURRENT #CONFLICTS #CRITIQUE #Nina #Montmann #Mint, visualizationCritical Infrastructure Protection in the Light of the Armed Conflicts [Advanced
Critical Infrastructure Protection in the Light of the Armed Conflicts [Advanced
Price : 161.35
Ends on : N/A
View on eBay
Critical infrastructure protection is paramount in times of armed conflicts, as these vital assets are often targeted by hostile forces seeking to disrupt and destabilize a nation’s essential services. From power plants and water treatment facilities to communication networks and transportation systems, safeguarding these critical assets is crucial for ensuring the safety and security of the population.In the face of armed conflicts, governments must prioritize the protection of critical infrastructure to prevent widespread disruption and chaos. This requires a multi-faceted approach that includes robust physical security measures, cybersecurity defenses, and contingency plans for emergency response and recovery.
One of the key challenges in protecting critical infrastructure during armed conflicts is the evolving nature of modern warfare, which increasingly involves cyber attacks and other non-traditional threats. This underscores the need for constant vigilance and adaptation in security strategies to effectively safeguard vital assets.
Furthermore, collaboration and coordination among government agencies, private sector partners, and international organizations are essential for enhancing the resilience of critical infrastructure in times of conflict. By working together, stakeholders can share information, resources, and best practices to strengthen protection measures and mitigate risks.
In conclusion, critical infrastructure protection is a critical component of national security during armed conflicts. By investing in robust security measures, promoting collaboration among stakeholders, and adapting to emerging threats, nations can better safeguard their essential services and ensure the safety and well-being of their citizens.
#Critical #Infrastructure #Protection #Light #Armed #Conflicts #Advanced, Intelligent data infrastructureAir Conflicts Collection – Nintendo Switch
Price:$39.99– $28.83
(as of Dec 19,2024 02:34:42 UTC – Details)
Prepare to take the battle to the skies as two of the most popular titles in the ‘Air Conflicts’ series make their debut on the Nintendo Switch. The Air Conflicts Collection sees arcade flights action titles Air Conflicts: Secret Wars and Air Conflicts: Pacific Carriers come together in one action packed collection, guaranteed to test your dog fighting skills to the limit. Air Conflicts: Secret Wars throws you into action-packed air combat at historical locations of the First and Second World War. Choose from more than 16 different aircraft and fight enemies in breath-taking dog fights spanning seven campaigns. Show everyone you’re an ace in multiplayer mode with up to 8 players featuring five action-packed modes. In Air Conflicts: Pacific Carriers, you will relive the Pacific War in historical battles and original planes that are accurate down to the last detail. Play two campaigns revolving around historically significant aircraft carriers, either for the US Navy or the Imperial Japanese Army and experience the vast scale of a conflict that shaped the history of warfare on the open seas and in the skies. Step into the cockpits of 18 famous airplane types and experience the most famous battles of the Pacific War and fly missions located in Midway, Pearl Harbor, and Wake Island.
Fight enemies in hair-raising dogfight missions, like patrolling, bombing and escort objectives, and stealth flights.
Fly more than 30 famous aircrafts from both World Wars.
Experience the most famous battles of the Pacific War and fly missions located in Midway, Pearl Harbor, and Wake Island.
Put your flying abilities to the test in online multiplayer modes, including aerial and aircraft carrier battles.Customers say
Customers appreciate the game’s functionality, graphics quality, and simulation quality. They find the game plays well, has beautifully rendered oceans and clouds, and is a decent arcade flight simulator. However, some customers have issues with control and disagree on whether it’s fun to play and easy to use.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Attention all aviation enthusiasts! The Air Conflicts Collection is now available for the Nintendo Switch, allowing you to take to the skies and engage in thrilling aerial combat on the go.This collection includes Air Conflicts: Pacific Carriers and Air Conflicts: Secret Wars, giving you the chance to pilot a variety of historically accurate aircraft in intense battles across different eras of aviation history.
With realistic graphics, engaging gameplay, and a variety of missions to complete, the Air Conflicts Collection is sure to satisfy your need for high-flying action.
So grab your Joy-Cons, buckle up, and get ready to experience the excitement of aerial combat on the Nintendo Switch with the Air Conflicts Collection. Fly high and dominate the skies!
#Air #Conflicts #Collection #Nintendo #SwitchMind the Tech Gap: Addressing the Conflicts between IT and Security Teams (ISSN)
Price: $21.00
(as of Dec 16,2024 03:57:36 UTC – Details)
ASIN : B0BB138QSN
Publisher : CRC Press; 1st edition (October 5, 2022)
Publication date : October 5, 2022
Language : English
File size : 2887 KB
Simultaneous device usage : Up to 4 simultaneous devices, per publisher limits
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Print length : 214 pages
Page numbers source ISBN : 1032206160
In today’s digital age, the integration of technology and security has become increasingly important for businesses to protect their sensitive data and assets. However, there is often a significant gap between IT and security teams, leading to conflicts and inefficiencies in addressing cybersecurity threats. In this post, we will explore the challenges that arise from this gap and discuss strategies for bridging the divide to enhance overall security posture.ISSN: 2567-8374
Introduction:
The rapid pace of technological advancement has revolutionized the way businesses operate, allowing for increased efficiency and productivity. However, this digital transformation has also brought about new challenges, particularly in the realm of cybersecurity. As cyber threats become more sophisticated and prevalent, organizations must work to strengthen their defenses and safeguard their critical information.
One of the key issues that many businesses face is the disconnect between their IT and security teams. While IT teams are responsible for implementing and managing technology infrastructure, security teams are tasked with protecting against cyber threats and ensuring compliance with regulations. This separation of responsibilities can lead to miscommunication, conflicting priorities, and ultimately, gaps in security.
Challenges:
The divide between IT and security teams can manifest in a variety of ways, creating obstacles to effective cybersecurity management. Some of the common challenges include:
1. Lack of communication: IT and security teams may operate in silos, with limited interaction and collaboration. This can result in a lack of understanding of each other’s roles and responsibilities, leading to misaligned priorities and strategies.
2. Competing interests: IT teams are often focused on maintaining system availability and performance, while security teams prioritize risk mitigation and threat prevention. These differing objectives can create tension and hinder cooperation between the two groups.
3. Limited resources: Both IT and security teams face resource constraints, such as budget and staffing limitations. Without adequate support, teams may struggle to implement comprehensive security measures and respond effectively to incidents.
Strategies for Bridging the Gap:
To address the conflicts between IT and security teams and enhance overall cybersecurity posture, organizations can take several proactive steps:
1. Foster collaboration: Encourage regular communication and collaboration between IT and security teams to promote mutual understanding and alignment of goals. Establish cross-functional working groups or committees to facilitate coordination on security initiatives.
2. Establish a common language: Develop shared terminology and metrics to bridge the gap between IT and security teams. This can help streamline communication and ensure that both groups are working towards the same objectives.
3. Invest in training and development: Provide training and professional development opportunities for IT and security team members to enhance their technical skills and cybersecurity knowledge. Encourage cross-training to build a more versatile and knowledgeable workforce.
4. Implement integrated tools and processes: Deploy security technologies that integrate seamlessly with existing IT infrastructure to streamline operations and improve visibility into security threats. Automate routine tasks to free up resources for more strategic initiatives.
Conclusion:
The collaboration between IT and security teams is essential for effectively managing cybersecurity risks and protecting organizational assets. By addressing the conflicts and gaps between these two groups, businesses can enhance their security posture and better defend against evolving cyber threats. By fostering communication, establishing common goals, investing in training, and implementing integrated tools, organizations can bridge the tech gap and build a more resilient security framework.
ISSN: 2567-8374
#Mind #Tech #Gap #Addressing #Conflicts #Security #Teams #ISSN