Fascinating Cards 2020 US Congress ONLY 100 SETS MADE Pick From List UpTo 35%OFF
Price : 2.99
Ends on : N/A
View on eBay
Are you a political junkie or just love collecting unique and rare memorabilia? Look no further than our limited edition “Fascinating Cards 2020 US Congress” set!
We have only 100 sets available, each featuring a beautifully designed card for every member of the 2020 US Congress. From well-known names to rising stars, this collection is a must-have for any collector.
And the best part? You can pick and choose your favorite cards from the list and create your own customized set! Plus, for a limited time, you can get up to 35% off your purchase.
Don’t miss out on this exclusive opportunity to own a piece of history. Order your “Fascinating Cards 2020 US Congress” set today!
#Fascinating #Cards #Congress #SETS #Pick #List #UpTo #35OFF,ann
Judge Aileen Cannon on Tuesday extended the hold she has placed blocking the Justice Department from sharing special counsel Jack Smith’s report on his investigation into President Donald Trump’s mishandling of classified documents with members of Congress.
Her order took some jabs at the prosecutors representing to the position of former Attorney General Merrick Garland, accusing them of misleading her at a court hearing Friday and asserting that they’ve failed to live up to the “special role” they play in the criminal justice system.
Before Trump’s inauguration, Garland sought to share the report privately with a small group of lawmakers on the condition that they do not disclose what they learn from it.
On Tuesday, Cannon embraced arguments put forward by Trump’s former co-defendants Walt Nauta and Carlos de Oliveira – two employees of his charged with obstruction-related crimes – that even limited disclosure could prejudice them if their cases ever went to trial. Cannon dismissed the prosecution last summer on the grounds that Smith was unconstitutionally appointed, but that ruling is on appeal, leaving the possibility that the charges could be revived.
“The bare wishes of one Attorney General with ‘limited time’ in office to comply with a non-existent ‘historical practice’ of releasing Special Counsel reports in the pendency of criminal proceedings is not a valid reason,” Cannon wrote.
“And surely it does not override the obvious constitutional interests of Defendants in this action and this Court’s duty to protect the integrity of this proceeding.”
This story is breaking and will be updated.
In a recent ruling, Judge Aileen Cannon has stated that the Justice Department cannot share classified documents related to former President Trump with Congress. This decision comes as a blow to lawmakers who have been seeking access to these materials as part of ongoing investigations.
The ruling is based on the argument that the documents in question contain sensitive information that could jeopardize national security if released to the public. Judge Cannon emphasized the importance of protecting classified information and stated that Congress does not have the authority to demand access to these materials.
This decision has sparked debate among legal experts and politicians, with some arguing that transparency and accountability should take precedence over national security concerns. However, others believe that safeguarding classified information is essential to maintaining the integrity of the government.
It remains to be seen how this ruling will impact future efforts by Congress to obtain information related to the Trump administration. In the meantime, the debate over the balance between national security and government transparency continues to unfold.
House Oversight Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., has accused James Biden of lying to Congress during the impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden, urging the incoming attorney general to hold him accountable. The House committees previously referred both James and Hunter Biden to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution, citing false statements made during the inquiry.
James Biden allegedly misled Congress about meeting with Hunter Biden’s business partner, Tony Bobulinski, while pursuing a deal with CEFC China Energy.
Comer emphasized that James Biden’s actions warrant prosecution, stating that “no one should be above the law, regardless of his last name.”
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News
In a recent development, Peter Comer, the whistleblower who provided information about Hunter Biden’s business dealings in China, has accused James Biden, the brother of President-elect Joe Biden, of lying to Congress. Comer alleges that James Biden was involved in shady business dealings with Chinese companies, despite his denial during a congressional hearing.
Comer is now calling on the incoming Attorney General under the Trump administration to hold James Biden accountable for his alleged lies to Congress. He believes that it is crucial for the rule of law to be upheld and for those who deceive lawmakers to face consequences.
The allegations against James Biden add another layer of complexity to the ongoing controversy surrounding the Biden family’s business dealings. With the transition of power underway, it remains to be seen how the new administration will handle these accusations and whether there will be any legal ramifications for James Biden.
Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story.
BALTIMORE (WBFF) — A bill that would place undocumented immigrants charged with crimes such as theft into federal custody is advancing in Congress after passing both the House and Senate. The legislation, known as the Laken Riley Act, is named after the Georgia woman who was killed by an undocumented migrant.
The bill, which gained overwhelming bipartisan support, faced opposition from Maryland Democratic Congressman Johnny Olszewski, who voted against it. Olszewski, a former Baltimore County Executive, has previously faced criticism for the release of an undocumented convicted sex offender.
“The person in our question was in our custody for 15 months,” Olszewski said, defending his decision. He explained that without a court trial or a judge’s directive, there was no reason to continue holding the individual.
Maryland ICE Director Matthew Elliston criticized Baltimore County for releasing the convicted sex offender, stating, “It’s a massive mischaracterization.” Elliston noted that the suspect had an active ICE detainer and said, “They had every opportunity to work with us and come find him.”
Baltimore County, known as a sanctuary for undocumented immigrants, has been a point of contention for Elliston. A FOX45 investigation revealed that the county chose not to honor 70% of detainers, some for violent offenders. Following this, Olszewski changed the county’s policy to notify ICE 48 hours before releasing someone with a detainer.
“First of all, I have no tolerance for sex offenders in our community,” Olszewski said, acknowledging the policy change. However, he admitted, “Am I satisfied, no not really. Is this the best we could come up with, yes.”
FOX45 reached out to Congressman Olszewski with questions regarding his vote against the Laken Riley Act, but has not yet received a response.
As Laken Riley’s family continues to cope with their loss, they expressed the impact of her death. “Laken’s life was not the only life taken on that day that Jose Ibarra attacked her. The life of her family and friends was taken too,” a family member said.
The bill, honoring Riley’s tragedy, is one step closer to becoming law. It passed the Senate on Friday but will return to the House for further consideration due to amendments. President-elect Trump is expected to sign it once finalized.
The controversial bill targeting undocumented immigrants charged with crimes has advanced in Congress, sparking heated debates and discussions among lawmakers and the public.
The bill, which aims to crack down on undocumented immigrants who have committed crimes, has faced backlash from immigrant rights advocates who argue that it unfairly targets and criminalizes an already vulnerable population.
Supporters of the bill, however, argue that it is necessary to ensure public safety and hold individuals accountable for their actions, regardless of their immigration status.
As the bill moves forward in Congress, it is likely to continue stirring up strong emotions and opinions on both sides of the debate. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.
After four years of inflation, chaos at our borders, and weakness on the world stage, the United States is turning the page. President Trump’s inauguration will usher in a new era focused on American strength – including a strong economy, a strong border and a strong military.
I expect we will see the president take action immediately to secure the border and undo Biden administration policies that threaten America’s energy security. And Republicans in Congress will work tirelessly to amplify his efforts.
We are already hard at work on legislation to accomplish two of our biggest priorities – providing the resources necessary to secure the border and extending the tax relief Republicans passed during the first Trump administration.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune and President Donald Trump(Reuters)
The Senate took an initial step on border security this past week with consideration of the Laken Riley Act, which will ensure that illegal aliens who steal, assault a law enforcement officer, or kill or seriously injure another person are detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement instead of being allowed out on the streets.
We’re looking to pass the bill in the Senate Monday and get it to the president’s desk shortly thereafter. Congressional Republicans will also deploy the Congressional Review Act to undo burdensome Biden administration regulations.
The voters handed President Trump a decisive victory in November. And now the real work begins: delivering on the mandate they’ve given us.
The Senate is also hard at work making sure President Trump has the team he needs in place. Senate committees have held hearings on 12 of President Trump’s nominees so far, with more on the way.
Last Wednesday, our committees held six hearings on Cabinet confirmations in one day, the most Cabinet confirmation hearings in a single day since 2001. Once nominees are out of committee, we’ll be working to quickly schedule confirmation votes on the Senate floor, with the goal of getting the president’s full Cabinet in place as soon as possible.
It’s going to be a new day in the executive branch in Washington. President Trump’s nominees are going to be focused on work, not woke. The days of executive branch agencies targeting conservative Americans, pushing extreme social policies, and advancing the social and environmental fantasies of the far left are over.
How refreshing it will be to have an administration focused on relieving regulatory burdens, promoting a strong economy and building up our military. The Trump administration – and Republicans in Congress – will also be focused on increasing government efficiency. When we see a way to eliminate waste or save taxpayer dollars, we’re going to take it.
I don’t think it’s any coincidence that there’s a new optimism in the air since November. President Trump’s belief in our country and our citizens is contagious. He reminds us that anything is possible in America, and that while we may have had a tough four years under the Biden administration, we have everything we need to come back stronger.
The voters handed President Trump a decisive victory in November. And now the real work begins: delivering on the mandate they’ve given us.
I am confident that with President Trump’s leadership and Republicans working together, we can spend the next four years building a stronger and more prosperous America, and a bright new future for the American people.
As the newly-elected Senate Majority Whip, Leader John Thune is ready to lead Congress in working alongside President Trump to deliver on the mandate given by the American people. With a clear vision for the future and a commitment to putting the needs of the American people first, Thune is determined to make progress on key issues such as healthcare, infrastructure, and national security.
Thune believes in the power of collaboration and bipartisanship, and is eager to work with members of both parties to find common ground and move the country forward. He understands the challenges facing our nation and is dedicated to finding solutions that benefit all Americans.
As we enter a new era of leadership, Thune is confident that by working together, Congress and the President can make meaningful progress on the issues that matter most to the American people. With a strong leader like Thune at the helm, there is no limit to what can be accomplished.
As a student of politics, I am befuddled by how the Congress appears to be thinking these days. The June 2024 verdict seemed to be a moment of repair and rebuilding for the party. And it could legitimately draw satisfaction from the fact that the Opposition had pulled the Narendra Modi-led Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) below the majority mark.
PREMIUM New Delhi, India – Jan. 16, 2025: Congress supporters seen as Sandeep Dikshit, Candidate of Congress Party from New Delhi Constituency for upcoming Vidhan Sabha Elections goes for filing his Nomination Papers in New Delhi in New Delhi, India, on Thursday, January 16, 2025. (Photo by Sanchit Khanna/ Hindustan Times) (Hindustan Times)
But just like in journalism, you are only as good as your last story: Politics is 24×7. And a slew of defeats and setbacks in assembly elections — Maharashtra, Haryana and an indifferent performance in Jammu and Kashmir — should have raised the alarm. Instead, in peak election season in the national Capital, the Congress seems to have all but given up before the first vote is cast. And, more bewilderingly, the Congress leadership is pulling the party into ideological squabbles that have little to no resonance with regular voters.
Take Rahul Gandhi’s comments as the new party headquarters were unveiled. Had the leader of the Opposition framed his allegations about the capture of institutions as a confrontation with the Modi government, no eyebrows would have been raised. That he described the battle as a fight with the Indian State was a clear political fumble. Media headlines, social media posts, debates and counter-allegations followed. The BJP feasted on the stumble and the Congress had to defend itself for its choice of words. Such time and space could have been used to actually challenge the government on jobs, the economy and taxes. Or on education and health services.
Rahul Gandhi also got locked into a fierce and frontal argument with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) chief Mohan Bhagwat for describing the day of the Ram Mandir as a day of true independence and August 15, 1947, as a moment of political independence. He ratcheted up the attack by arguing that Bhagwat should be tried for treason. Once again, high-pitched headlines were all over the exchange.
Once again, the time and focus spent on this was politically wasteful. The Congress scored zero seats in Delhi assembly elections in 2015 and 2020. And in the 2020 elections, party candidates in 63 of the 66 seats the Congress fought in, lost their security deposits. The Congress’ time should be spent on growing organisational roots rather than on polemical spats. And if the Congress believes that it does not have any worthwhile prospects in this election, it may as well have sat them out and joined hands with Arvind Kejriwal.
Kejriwal and his Aam Aadmi Party are, by contrast, running a very different rhetorical campaign from the one led by Rahul Gandhi. Kejriwal deftly avoids any sort of ideological debate with the BJP. If anything, schemes like the one he’s just announced for temple priests, are clearly tactical moves at courting the Hindu vote. He has managed to do so without antagonising large swathes of the Muslim voter, because he remains an antagonist of the BJP and the prime minister. However, for the most part, his focus has remained on issues of development, governance and welfare schemes.
Kejriwal is probably fighting the toughest political battle of his career this time. He must deal with twin PR problems — his arrest in the Delhi liquor scam and the negative perception around the extravagant spending on his house which the BJP has dubbed sheesh mahal. Yet, he has hunkered down and worked in the field since his release from prison.
In taking him on, the BJP, which has not won a Delhi assembly election since 1998 (though it has swept three consecutive Lok Sabha elections since 2014 with a 7-0 tally) has also made a befuddling choice. It has not been able to field a face to take on Kejriwal who can also capture the wider imagination of the public. Murmurs that Smriti Irani would make a wild card entry into the Delhi battleground have not yet shown any signs of coming true. The BJP is probably hoping for a repeat of its Haryana show, by falling back on its organisational machinery in the absence of a strong individual contender. But it appears to be a tactical mistake.
That said, the BJP can afford more mistakes than the Congress.
Rahul Gandhi’s other pet issue — the allegations around the Adani Group — also received a knock this week with Hindenburg, the short-seller that first made the charges, announcing a decision to shut shop. In any case, his own allies and chief ministers have never seemed especially enamoured of the issue. And the average voter probably doesn’t think it makes a difference to her life. This brings us to what the military strategist Sun Tzu warned of in The Art of War: “He will win who knows when to fight and when not to fight.”
The Congress has every right to defend its ideology. But without political power, it cannot address anyone but the already converted. It needs to pick its battles better.
Barkha Dutt is an award-winning journalist and author.The views expressed are personal
In the current political climate, it is easy to get caught up in the polemics and divisive rhetoric that dominates our national discourse. However, now more than ever, Congress needs to focus on politics – the art of governing and finding solutions to the pressing issues facing our country.
While it may be tempting to engage in heated debates and partisan bickering, it is crucial that our elected officials prioritize working together to address the challenges that are impacting the lives of all Americans. From healthcare and education to infrastructure and national security, there are countless important issues that require thoughtful and collaborative policymaking.
Instead of getting bogged down in political posturing and personal attacks, Congress must come together to find common ground and enact meaningful legislation that will benefit the American people. It is time for our lawmakers to set aside their differences and focus on the politics of governing, not the polemics of division.
Let us hold our elected officials accountable and demand that they put aside their partisan differences and work together to address the issues that matter most. The future of our country depends on it.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin ‘s failure to inform Congress or the White House as required when he was incapacitated due to treatment for prostate cancer and later complications potentially raised “unnecessary” security risks, the Pentagon’s watchdog concluded in a highly critical report released Wednesday.
The inspector general’s report concluded there were no “adverse consequences” resulting from the poor communications about his condition a year ago. But it faulted Austin for keeping his hospitalization secret for days, even from President Joe Biden, and found that his strong desire for privacy likely influenced his staff in deciding not to prod further into his condition.
The report released by inspector general Robert Storch describes text messages and calls showing staff concerns about the situation and who could be notified, and it noted conflicting recollections of events. But no bombshells about the stunning lapse emerged in the findings revealed just four days before Austin leaves the job and President-elect Donald Trump takes office.
In several instances, staff said Austin told them to keep his hospitalization quiet. But Austin said he did not. In one example, he directed a staff aide that if anyone had questions, “you’re more than welcome to ask (me) directly” — likely chilling further inquiry, the report said.
And one of his security staff said Austin stated, “We’re not notifying anybody,” so they kept the medical problems as “private as possible” and did not notify Austin’s chief of staff or others.
The report concluded that “Secretary Austin’s insistence on privacy regarding his medical condition was coupled with his desire to avoid publicity about his condition.” And it noted that in a Jan. 8 text message to his chief of staff, Austin wrote: “I don’t want my health to be a media circus.”
Asked about the differences, a senior defense official told reporters Wednesday that it is possible for two people to remember or interpret a conversation differently. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss details of the report, also said the department does not know why it took until the last week of the administration for Storch to release the report.
In later text messages to Austin’s junior aide, the chief of staff, Kelly Magsamen, said, “I wish (Secretary Austin) were a normal person but he’s the (secretary of defense). We have a big institutional responsibility. He can’t just go totally dark on his staff. … Please pass to him that we can’t keep his hospitalization a secret forever. It’s kind of big deal for him to be in (the intensive care unit).”
She also noted that White House and other officials were asking questions about Austin’s whereabouts and that they would have to be notified soon, adding that she was “uncomfortable” with the situation.
The inspector general said that while there were no serious consequences due to how the hospitalizations were handled, “the risks to our national defense, including the command and control of the DoD’s critical national security operations, were increased unnecessarily.”
Austin did not inform either Congress or the White House of his initial treatment in December 2023 for prostate cancer or tell his staff or the White House of his worsening complications on Jan. 1, 2024, when he was taken by ambulance to Walter Reed Army National Military Medical Center.
The findings mirror much of the criticism in an internal review done about a month after Austin was admitted to Walter Reed. That internal review, done by Austin’s subordinates, largely absolved anyone of wrongdoing for the secrecy surrounding his hospitalization. And it said flatly there was “no indication of ill intent or an attempt to obfuscate.”
Although he transferred decision-making authorities to Deputy Secretary Kathleen Hicks during his initial surgery and then again when he was in intensive care, he did not tell her why and he did not inform the White House.
The incident angered the White House and infuriated members of Congress, who called him to Capitol Hill for a hearing, where he faced bipartisan criticism and and demands that someone should have been held accountable.
Austin himself, in a lengthy press conference after he returned to work, largely took the blame. He told reporters that he never told his staff to keep his surgery and hospitalization secret from the White House, but acknowledged that he should have handled it differently and apologized for keeping Biden and others in the dark.
Austin was diagnosed with prostate cancer in early December 2023 and went to Walter Reed for surgery on Dec. 22. On Jan. 1, 2024, he was taken back by ambulance after experiencing significant pain and was moved to the intensive care unit the next day.
Pentagon officials have acknowledged that public affairs and defense aides were told on Jan. 2 that Austin had been hospitalized but did not make it public and did not tell the military service leaders or the National Security Council until Jan. 4. Only then Biden find out. It took four more days before the reason for his hospitalization was disclosed.
The internal review called for procedural changes to improve communications and avoid similar problems in the future. The White House also made changes in federal guidelines as a result of the incident.
Austin failed to tell Congress or the White House about his health problems as required, report says
According to a recent report, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin failed to disclose his health issues to Congress and the White House as required by law. Austin, who underwent treatment for prostate cancer earlier this year, did not inform key officials about his condition, raising concerns about the transparency and accountability of the Department of Defense.
The report, released by a government watchdog group, found that Austin did not properly disclose his health problems in his annual financial disclosure forms, as required by law. The failure to disclose this information raises questions about Austin’s ability to effectively carry out his duties as Defense Secretary and his ability to lead the Department of Defense.
In response to the report, Austin’s office issued a statement saying that he takes his health and his responsibilities as Defense Secretary seriously and that he will work to ensure that all necessary information is properly disclosed in the future. However, critics argue that Austin’s failure to disclose his health problems is a serious breach of trust and raises concerns about his ability to lead the Department of Defense effectively.
As the head of the Department of Defense, Austin plays a crucial role in national security and defense policy. It is imperative that he is transparent and honest with Congress and the White House about his health and any other issues that may impact his ability to carry out his duties. Failure to do so undermines the trust and confidence of the American people and raises serious questions about Austin’s fitness to serve as Defense Secretary.
Republicans say they’re ready to work together to tackle a full load of legislative priorities, from paring down government spending to passing Trump’s agenda on tax cuts, oil and gas production, mass deportations and more.
But delivering on their goals may not be easy. Republicans have a tiny majority in the House, and every lawmaker has their own priorities. That means just a few members can derail even must-pass legislation.
And Trump has already demonstrated to lawmakers how quickly he can force them to change their plans: Controversial Cabinet nominees have had Senate Republicans scrambling to appease Trump while weighing fitness for office. House Republicans had a deal to avoid a government shutdown blown up overnight by Trump demanding big changes.
Plus, events can scramble or accelerate any would-be priorities. For example, GOP senators are also highlighting a New Year’s Day attack in New Orleans that killed at least 14 people and a fatal Tesla Cybertruck explosion at the Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas as an imperative to get the president-elect’s national security nominees confirmed as soon as possible.
Here’s what to expect from the new 119th Congress.
But a few ultraconservative House lawmakers have said they aren’t sure whether they’ll vote for Johnson again after a spending meltdown paralyzed the House right before the holiday break.
Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., has said he won’t vote for Johnson no matter what. All Democrats plan to support House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. That means Johnson must get every other Republican member of Congress to vote for him to keep his crown.
A few other House Republicans say they are still undecided on whether to support Johnson, even after Trump endorsed him. At least one Republican, Rep. Victoria Spartz of Indiana, has publicly released a list of demands she wants in exchange for their vote. Expect more wheeling and dealing before they throw their support behind Johnson – if they do so at all.
Tiny vote margins could cause headaches
Republicans will have a tiny four-seat majority in the House when Congress convenes, the smallest in modern history.
That ratio will shift throughout the beginning of the year. Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., resigned from the House in November and will not retake his seat on Friday, leaving one vacancy as the year begins (a 219-215 majority for Republicans.)
Reps. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y. and Mike Waltz, R-Fla., plan to leave Congress for roles in the Trump administration, but not until at least Jan. 20, when Trump is inaugurated. That will further narrow the majority temporarily to 217-215.
All three are from districts that are likely to send another Republican to replace their departing member during special elections to replace the departing members. Once that happens, the final Republican majority is expected to be 220-215.
These narrow margins mean the GOP will need nearly total unanimity to get anything through the lower chamber – giving each House Republican significant power to derail any legislation if they disagree with it. That kind of power dynamic has been a challenge for the conference before, as rank-and-file members repeatedly blocked or delayed policy spearheaded by their own leadership in the last Congress.
In the Senate, Republicans will also have a relatively thin 53-47 majority. That’s enough to comfortably pass agreed-upon GOP priorities, but not enough to easily approve controversial ones that may lose the support of moderate senators like Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska. Case in point: Gaetz dropped out of consideration to be Trump’s attorney general when it was clear he could not get enough GOP support to get approved.
Republicans’ Senate majority is also not big enough to overcome the 60-vote threshold necessary to overcome the filibuster on most legislation. Republicans plan to pass much of Trump’s agenda through a party-line “reconciliation” process (more on that below), but any other policy will need Democratic support.
Make Washington make sense: Sign up for USA TODAY’s On Politics newsletter.
A big play for Trump’s agenda
Most federal government trifectas last only two years.
Republicans are well aware of this and plan to move quickly to pass ambitious policies that reflect Trump’s campaign promises. If done the typical way, most of those policies would hit a dead end in the Senate controlled 53-47 by Republicans, as 60 votes are needed to pass the vast majority of bills.
To get around that, Republicans plan to use a procedure called “reconciliation” to pass their tax and spending-related priorities with a simple majority vote – the same tool Democrats used to push through President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act in 2022 and a COVID-19 stimulus bill in 2021.
Republicans have said they want to focus on border security, domestic energy production, extending Trump’s 2017 tax plan, paring down government spending and more. They may pursue two separate reconciliation packages, focusing on border security first.
Before they left for the holidays, House Republicans added a last-minute wrinkle to that plan. They agreed to pursue raising the debt ceiling as part of the reconciliation process – which is sure to be a politically fraught debate. Raising the debt ceiling pays the federal government’s loans on things it has already paid for, and defaulting on the federal debt could have catastrophic consequences. The high-stakes debate regularly stirs up concerns about government spending and likely won’t be easily resolved.
Democrats playing the opposition
Democrats will be in the minority in both chambers, denying them powerful committee chairmanships, subpoena power for oversight and investigations without GOP support, and leadership roles that can set the agenda in Congress.
Instead, they’ll likely focus on telling the public about what they see as the harmful consequences of Republican policies to rally opposition and potentially bring more voters to their side in the 2026 midterm elections.
In the Senate, they’ll be able to throw up roadblocks to legislation they oppose by using the filibuster to create a 60-vote threshold to pass most bills – except the party-line reconciliation bills Republicans plan to use for Trump’s priorities.
And if Republicans can’t agree among themselves enough to take advantage of that tiny majority in the House? Don’t expect Democrats to bail them out unless they get something in return.
A constant 2026 midterm threat
Political trifectas typically don’t last long for either Democrats or Republicans.
The majority party has repeatedly lost control of the House in the first midterm election after gaining across-the-board power in a presidential election: Biden, Trump, former President Barack Obama, and former President Bill Clinton all lost the House after their first two years in office.
Still, lawmakers who are up for reelection in 2026 – all House members and 33 senators – will constantly be looking to deliver for voters in the hopes they can keep their seats in two years.
Only one Senate Republican is running in a state won by Democratic presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harris in 2024: Collins of Maine. The political map can also easily change in an off-cycle election season where there’s no presidential race atop the ticket. In addition, several Republican senators in deeper red states could be vulnerable to primary threats.
Trump and his allies are already leveraging those dynamics in both the House and Senate by threatening to back primary challengers to independent-minded Republicans to try to force them to fall in line.
For example, Trump said in mid-December that GOP senators who oppose his nominees for “stupid” reasons should face primary challengers. A few days later, he posted on social media that he hoped Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, who opposed his government funding plan, would get a primary challenge and said: “Republican obstructionists have to be done away with.”
But some lawmakers are already growing tired of the threats.
“You can’t primary” every Republican who votes against spending bills, Massie said after the spending bill passed with 34 Republicans voting against it. “I mean, you can… You’ll weed out the weak. But the rest of us will have antibodies.”
The new Congress is gearing up to take office in January, and there are a lot of expectations and uncertainties surrounding what to expect from the incoming legislators. From big policy changes to the unpredictable influence of President Trump, here’s a breakdown of what could be in store for the next session of Congress.
Big Policies:
One of the major issues that is expected to be at the forefront of the new Congress’s agenda is healthcare. With the ongoing debate over the Affordable Care Act and rising healthcare costs, Democrats are likely to push for expanding access to healthcare and lowering prescription drug prices. Republicans, on the other hand, may aim to make changes to the ACA or propose alternative healthcare solutions.
Another key policy area that is expected to be a focus for the new Congress is climate change. Democrats have made it clear that they plan to prioritize climate action, including investments in clean energy, environmental protections, and addressing the impacts of climate change. Republicans may push back against some of these efforts, raising concerns about the economic impact of such policies.
Trump Wildcard:
One of the biggest uncertainties surrounding the new Congress is the influence of President Trump. While he will no longer be in office, Trump’s presence and influence are likely to continue to shape the political landscape. From his potential involvement in the Republican Party to his social media presence and possible influence on policy debates, Trump remains a wildcard in the upcoming session of Congress.
Overall, the new Congress is expected to be a contentious and active session, with debates over healthcare, climate change, and other key policy issues likely to dominate the agenda. The influence of President Trump adds an additional layer of uncertainty to the proceedings, making it difficult to predict exactly what will happen in the next session of Congress. Stay tuned for updates as the new Congress takes office and begins its work.
Who represents you? Here are the demographics of the new US Congress
Updated: 12:09 PM EST Jan 3, 2025
Friday marks the start of the 119th United States Congress as new members are scheduled to be sworn in on Capitol Hill. As Washington prepares for the new legislative session, let’s meet who will be in office. Republicans will hold a dual-chamber majority over Democrats after securing their lead in the Senate by flipping four seats in the November elections. The Senate is now composed of 53 Republicans and 47 Democrats. In the House of Representatives, Republicans hold a narrow 219-215 lead over Democrats. Florida District 1 is currently vacant due to the Nov. 21 withdrawal of Matt Gaetz after he was investigated by the Department of Justice for alleged sex trafficking.A special election is set in the new year to fill the vacant seat. The Republican primary will be on Jan. 28 and the general election will be on April 1.Across both chambers of Congress, members are predominately white. Hispanic and Latino people are particularly underrepresented, and Black people are underrepresented in the House.Viewing in the app? Click here for the best interactive experience.Over 90% of elected Republicans to Congress are white. In the U.S., white people only make up about 58% of the general population. Democratic Congress members are more racially and ethnically diverse, with about 56% white, 21% Black and 12% Hispanic/Latino. The 119th Congress has yet to secure a 50-50 gender equality split. There will be one less woman in the new session than there was on Election Day in 2024, according to the Center for American Women and Politics.Democrats are closer to a halfway split, with women representing 42% of members across both chambers. Among Republicans, only 15% are women.As for age — which has been a center of conversation for the president’s seat — while senators are, on average, slightly older than representatives, there’s a fair range across generations.Already, Gen Z has landed on Capitol Hill, with Rep. Maxwell Frost, D-Florida, taking office in 2023. Frost remains the youngest member of Congress at 27, while Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, is the oldest at 91. Grassley has served in the Senate for 44 years. He’s tied for most years of service with House Reps. Christopher Smith, R-New Jersey; Steny Hoyer, D-Maryland; and Harold Rogers, R-Kentucky.Other interesting demographic facts:There are 26 Mikes/Michaels elected to the 119th Congress.John/Jon is the runner-up at 22 members.The most common birth month was February, and the most common birthday of the month was the 4th. Representatives Sanford Bishop, D-Georgia; Michael Guest, R-Mississippi; and Claudia Tenney, R-New York, are the three lucky ones with birthdays directly on Feb. 4. The first transgender member of Congress — Rep. Sarah McBride, D-Deleware — will be sworn in on Jan. 3.Meet your senators and representatives below. PHNjcmlwdCB0eXBlPSJ0ZXh0L2phdmFzY3JpcHQiPiFmdW5jdGlvbigpeyJ1c2Ugc3RyaWN0Ijt3aW5kb3cuYWRkRXZlbnRMaXN0ZW5lcigibWVzc2FnZSIsKGZ1bmN0aW9uKGUpe2lmKHZvaWQgMCE9PWUuZGF0YVsiZGF0YXdyYXBwZXItaGVpZ2h0Il0pe3ZhciB0PWRvY3VtZW50LnF1ZXJ5U2VsZWN0b3JBbGwoImlmcmFtZSIpO2Zvcih2YXIgYSBpbiBlLmRhdGFbImRhdGF3cmFwcGVyLWhlaWdodCJdKWZvcih2YXIgcj0wO3I8dC5sZW5ndGg7cisrKXtpZih0W3JdLmNvbnRlbnRXaW5kb3c9PT1lLnNvdXJjZSl0W3JdLnN0eWxlLmhlaWdodD1lLmRhdGFbImRhdGF3cmFwcGVyLWhlaWdodCJdW2FdKyJweCJ9fX0pKX0oKTs8L3NjcmlwdD4=
WASHINGTON —
Friday marks the start of the 119th United States Congress as new members are scheduled to be sworn in on Capitol Hill. As Washington prepares for the new legislative session, let’s meet who will be in office.
Republicans will hold a dual-chamber majority over Democrats after securing their lead in the Senate by flipping four seats in the November elections. The Senate is now composed of 53 Republicans and 47 Democrats.
In the House of Representatives, Republicans hold a narrow 219-215 lead over Democrats. Florida District 1 is currently vacant due to the Nov. 21 withdrawal of Matt Gaetz after he was investigated by the Department of Justice for alleged sex trafficking.
A special election is set in the new year to fill the vacant seat. The Republican primary will be on Jan. 28 and the general election will be on April 1.
Across both chambers of Congress, members are predominately white. Hispanic and Latino people are particularly underrepresented, and Black people are underrepresented in the House.
Viewing in the app? Click here for the best interactive experience.
Over 90% of elected Republicans to Congress are white. In the U.S., white people only make up about 58% of the general population.
Democratic Congress members are more racially and ethnically diverse, with about 56% white, 21% Black and 12% Hispanic/Latino.
The 119th Congress has yet to secure a 50-50 gender equality split. There will be one less woman in the new session than there was on Election Day in 2024, according to the Center for American Women and Politics.
Democrats are closer to a halfway split, with women representing 42% of members across both chambers. Among Republicans, only 15% are women.
As for age — which has been a center of conversation for the president’s seat — while senators are, on average, slightly older than representatives, there’s a fair range across generations.
Already, Gen Z has landed on Capitol Hill, with Rep. Maxwell Frost, D-Florida, taking office in 2023. Frost remains the youngest member of Congress at 27, while Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, is the oldest at 91.
Grassley has served in the Senate for 44 years. He’s tied for most years of service with House Reps. Christopher Smith, R-New Jersey; Steny Hoyer, D-Maryland; and Harold Rogers, R-Kentucky.
Other interesting demographic facts:
There are 26 Mikes/Michaels elected to the 119th Congress.
John/Jon is the runner-up at 22 members.
The most common birth month was February, and the most common birthday of the month was the 4th.
Representatives Sanford Bishop, D-Georgia; Michael Guest, R-Mississippi; and Claudia Tenney, R-New York, are the three lucky ones with birthdays directly on Feb. 4.
The first transgender member of Congress — Rep. Sarah McBride, D-Deleware — will be sworn in on Jan. 3.
Meet your senators and representatives below.
The 119th Congress, which began its session in January 2021, is shaping up to be one of the most diverse in history. With a record number of women, people of color, and LGBTQ individuals serving in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, the demographics of this Congress reflect a more accurate representation of the American population.
According to data from the Pew Research Center, the 119th Congress is composed of 27% women, the highest percentage in history. Additionally, 23% of members are people of color, a significant increase from previous sessions. This Congress also includes a record number of LGBTQ individuals, with at least nine openly LGBTQ members serving.
The increase in diversity in the 119th Congress is a positive step towards a more representative government that reflects the diversity of the American people. As lawmakers work to address issues such as racial inequality, gender discrimination, and LGBTQ rights, having a Congress that reflects the demographics of the country is crucial.
While there is still work to be done to ensure full representation for all marginalized groups, the demographics of the 119th Congress are a promising sign of progress towards a more inclusive and equitable government.
Tags:
demographics, 119th Congress, Congress demographics, US Congress, diversity in Congress, political representation, gender representation, racial diversity, age distribution, party affiliations, Congress members, Congress statistics
When the new Congress convenes Friday, there will be fewer people of color in the delegation than in recent years.
The 119th Congress will have 136 people of color, four fewer than the previous U.S. House and Senate, which was the most ethnically and racially diverse in history. However, this year’s delegation consists of several firsts, including the first time an openly transgender woman has served in Congress.
When it comes to parity between congressional representatives and the populations they serve, Illinois and Ohio are the only states with the same percentage of people of color in both. People of color make up 42% of Illinois’ population and representation; Ohio is 24%.
In most states, people of color are underrepresented in the House and Senate
Share of people of color in congress compared to the population that they represent
In the United States, 57% of the population are white and 43% are nonwhite, according to 2023 census data. In the House and Senate, 399 out of 535 representatives are white. A quarter are nonwhite.
From most people of color in Congress to least
States where the share of people of color in Congress matches their populations
States where the share of people of color in congress is lower than their populations
States where the share of people of color in Congress is lower than their populations
States with no representatives of color in Congress
States with no representatives of color in Congress
LOS ANGELES TIMES
Several other states are close to parity. New Mexico’s population is 64% nonwhite and 36% white. In the House and Senate, two out of five representatives are white, while 40% are nonwhite. Arizona’s representation is 55% white compared with 52% in its population.
Sixty-seven percent of California’s population and 52% of its representatives are people of color. The state’s delegation includes the highest number of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders with 10 members.
Less than a third of the 119th Congress are women. In the new Congress, six states have no female House or Senate members. Seven states have higher female representation in Congress than in their population.
U.S. Rep. Sarah McBride (D-Del.) is the first openly transgender member of Congress.
(Carolyn Kaster / Associated Press)
“My service is a testament to the fair-mindedness of Delawareans who this November demonstrated what I have seen throughout my life: that they judge candidates based on their ideas, not their identities,” McBride said. “I know how much this news would have meant to me as a young person growing up, worried that the heart of this country was simply not big enough to love someone like me, to have seen an out trans person get elected to federal office.”
North Dakota also had a milestone with Republican Julie Fedorchak becoming the first woman to represent the state in the U.S. House of Representatives. Fedorchak is also the first freshman in 14 years to be seated on the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
“What’s most important to me is how I use this,” Fedorchak told The Times. “I’m really excited to join the Republican women, a majority of them have great backgrounds and are really serious about good policy.”
Mississippi is the only state yet to send a woman to the House.
Women make up at least 50% of congressional representation in 11 states
Seven states have 50% or more women represented in the House and Senate. Five states are represented by 100% men.
In 2023, Rep. Becca Balint (D-Vt.) became Vermont’s first woman and out LGBTQ+ congressperson.
(Amanda Andrade-Rhoades / Associated Press)
In 2023, the 118th Congress was the most ethnically and racially diverse U.S. House and Senate in history. U.S. Rep. Maxwell Alejandro Frost (D-Fla.) was the first member of Generation Z to walk the congressional corridors. Trailblazers like Democrats U.S. Rep. Becca Balint, Vermont’s first woman and out LGBTQ+ congressperson, and U.S. Rep. Summer Lee, Pennsylvania’s first Black woman in Congress, shattered long-standing glass ceilings.
New Jersey is the only state with an all-minority Senate delegation in the country.
Newly elected Sen. Andy Kim (D-N.J.) is the first Korean American in the Senate. Kim said that while he is proud to break barriers, he looks forward to the day when his role in Congress is no longer seen as groundbreaking or pioneering, but commonplace. The night he was sworn into Congress, Kim called his mother who was crying tears of joy.
“It was really powerful to see this moment, not just for my family but for what it means to Korean Americans, Asian Americans, and what it means to immigrant families,” Kim said. “Hopefully they can see a continuation of this American dream that has been a shared pursuit for so many different ethnic groups and communities.”
The 119th Congress: How closely does your state’s delegation match its constituency?
As the 119th Congress convenes, it’s important to take a closer look at the makeup of each state’s delegation and how closely it reflects the demographic and political makeup of its constituents. With representatives and senators elected to represent the interests of their respective states, it’s crucial to assess whether they truly represent the diversity and values of their constituents.
In some states, the delegation may closely mirror the demographic and political composition of the state as a whole. However, in others, there may be significant discrepancies that raise questions about the representativeness of the delegation.
This post will delve into the makeup of each state’s delegation in the 119th Congress, analyzing factors such as gender, race, political affiliation, and ideology. By examining these factors, we can gain a better understanding of how well our elected officials truly represent the people they serve.
Stay tuned for a detailed analysis of each state’s delegation in the 119th Congress and how closely it aligns with its constituency.