Zion Tech Group

Tag: Constitutional

  • Trump makes moves to expand his power, sparking chaos and a possible constitutional crisis


    Just a little over a week into his second term, President Donald Trump took steps to maximize his power, sparking chaos and what critics contend is a constitutional crisis as he challenges the separation of powers that have defined American government for more than 200 years.

    The new administration’s most provocative move came this week, as it announced it would temporarily halt federal payments to ensure they complied with Trump’s orders barring diversity programs. The technical-sounding directive had enormous immediate impact before it was blocked by a federal judge, potentially pulling trillions of dollars from police departments, domestic violence shelters, nutrition services and disaster relief programs that rely on federal grants. The administration on Wednesday rescinded the order.

    Though the Republican administration denied Medicaid was affected, it acknowledged the online portal allowing states to file for reimbursement from the program was shut down for part of Tuesday in what it insisted was an error.

    Legal experts noted the president is explicitly forbidden from cutting off spending for programs that Congress has approved. The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the power to appropriate money and requires the executive to pay it out. A 50-year-old law known as the Impoundment Control Act makes that explicit by prohibiting the president from halting payments on grants or other programs approved by Congress.

    “The thing that prevents the president from being an absolute monarch is Congress controls the power of the purse strings,” said Josh Chafetz, a law professor at Georgetown University, adding that even a temporary freeze violates the law. “It’s what guarantees there’s a check on the presidency.”

    Democrats and other critics said the move was blatantly unconstitutional.

    “What happened last night is the most direct assault on the authority of Congress, I believe, in the history of the United States,” Sen. Angus King, an independent from Maine, said Tuesday.

    While some Republicans were critical, most were supportive.

    “I think he is testing the limits of his power, and I don’t think any of us are surprised by it,” said Sen. Kevin Cramer, a North Dakota Republican who is close with Trump.

    At first blush, the Trump administration appeared to be following the correct procedures in identifying potential spending cuts, and the Impoundment Control Act outlines a procedure for how they could become permanent, said Rachel Snyderman, a former official at the Office of Management and Budget who is now at the Bipartisan Policy Center.

    Congress must eventually sign off on any cuts the administration wants to make, Snyderman said, though she noted that no president since Bill Clinton, a Democrat, has been successful in getting that done. Congress did not act on $14 billion in impoundment cuts Trump proposed during his prior term, she said.

    “We have to see what the next steps are,” Snyderman said.

    The attempt to halt grants came after Trump, who during the campaign pledged to be “a dictator on day one,” has taken a number of provocative moves to challenge legal constraints on his power. He fired the inspectors general of his Cabinet agencies without giving Congress the warning required by law, declared that there is an immigrant “invasion” despite low numbers of border crossings, is requiring loyalty pledges from new hires, challenged the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship and is moving career staff out of key positions at the Department of Justice to ensure his loyalists control investigations and prosecutions.

    On Tuesday evening, the new administration made its latest move, trying to prune the federal workforce by offering pay until the end of September for those who agree to resign by the end of next week.

    The Trump actions have all led to a cascade of court challenges contending he has overstepped his constitutional bounds. A federal judge in Seattle has already put on hold Trump’s attempt to revoke birthright citizenship, calling it a blatant violation of the nation’s foundational legal document. On Tuesday, nonprofit groups persuaded a federal judge in Washington to put the administration’s spending freeze order on hold until a fuller hearing on Feb. 3.

    Democratic attorneys general also rushed to court to block the order. New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez, a Democrat, said the swiftness of the court action against Trump’s spending freeze demonstrates the “carelessness” of the order.

    “My hope is that the president, working with Congress, can identify whatever his priorities are and can work through the normal constitutional order that is well established that limits the power of Democratic and Republican presidents,” he said.

    The grant freeze — administration officials described it as a “pause” — fit with a long-sought goal of some Trump allies, including his nominee to run the Office of Management and Budget, Russell Vought, to challenge the constitutionality of the Impoundment Control Act. They contend the president, as the person in charge of distributing funds, should be able to have some control over how the money goes out.

    Though there’s little doubt the new administration wanted a court fight over its power to control spending, experts agree that this was likely not the way they hoped to present it.

    “This is a really sloppy way of doing this,” said Bill Galston, of the Brookings Institution, adding that he thought it was an administration error. “This is just classic Trump. He believes it’s better to be fast and sloppy than slow and precise.”

    In her first press conference, Trump’s new press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, on Tuesday urged organizations that need the grants to call the administration and show how their operations are “in line with the president’s agenda.”

    “It’s incumbent on this administration to make sure, again, that every penny is accounted for,” Leavitt said.

    Republican lawmakers largely took the freeze in stride.

    “This isn’t a huge surprise to me,” said Rep. Dusty Johnson of South Dakota during the House Republican retreat at one of the president’s Florida golf resorts. “Clearly, Donald Trump campaigned in no small part on the idea that the Biden administration was putting out a lot of money that was not consistent with Donald Trump’s values.”

    But Democrats and others were furious at the move, which seemed designed to undercut congressional authority.

    “If President Trump wants to change our nation’s laws, he has the right to ask Congress to change them,” Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont, said in a statement. “He does not have the right to violate the United States Constitution. He is not a king.”

    Chafetz, of Georgetown University, said the lack of pushback from Republican members of Congress was especially alarming because the legislative branch is the one whose powers are most at risk in the latest power play.

    Even if Trump loses the legal battle, Chafetz said, he and his followers might feel like they’ve won by pushing things to this extreme.

    “Damaging the institutions they don’t like,” he said, “seems to be their whole theory of governance.”

    ___

    Riccardi reported from Denver. Associated Press writers Kevin Freking and Lisa Mascaro in Washington and Morgan Lee in Albuquerque, New Mexico, contributed to this report.





    In a shocking turn of events, President Trump has made bold strides towards expanding his power, sparking chaos and fear among Americans. With recent executive orders and controversial decisions, many are left wondering if we are on the brink of a constitutional crisis.

    One of the most alarming moves by the President is his decision to declare a national emergency in order to fund his long-promised border wall. By circumventing Congress and using emergency powers, Trump has raised concerns about the limits of presidential authority and the separation of powers outlined in the Constitution.

    Additionally, Trump has made moves to consolidate his power within the administration, purging dissenting voices and installing loyalists in key positions. This consolidation of power has raised fears of authoritarianism and a disregard for democratic norms.

    As tensions escalate and the country becomes increasingly polarized, it is crucial for lawmakers, the media, and the American people to remain vigilant and uphold the principles of democracy. The future of our nation may depend on how we respond to these unprecedented challenges to our constitutional system.

    Tags:

    1. Trump administration
    2. Executive power
    3. Constitutional crisis
    4. Political chaos
    5. Presidential authority
    6. Trump policies
    7. Government expansion
    8. White House decisions
    9. Political turmoil
    10. Constitutional implications

    #Trump #moves #expand #power #sparking #chaos #constitutional #crisis

  • State senator tries to roll back California’s calls for a constitutional convention

    State senator tries to roll back California’s calls for a constitutional convention


    Democratic State Senator Scott Wiener from San Francisco says California could unintentionally support a Republican-led constitutional convention and is urging the state Legislature to hedge that possibility.

    Republicans will have control of the U.S. House and Senate starting in January, when President-elect Donald Trump also takes office. 

    Wiener said the incoming Republican-led U.S. Congress could set a constitutional convention — or convening to rewrite the language of the Constitution — in motion based on outstanding calls from states like California, which could impact reproductive, voting or LGBTQ+ rights. 

    “There’s a risk that a right-wing Congress could decide that a constitutional convention has been convened, and then we would have a right-wing Congress setting the rules for how delegates are selected and what the ground rules are for the convention,” he said. 

    To try to prevent that, he recently filed a new resolution to rescind the state’s previous calls for a convention, saying the rules around federal constitutional conventions aren’t clear, and California’s outstanding calls could have unintended outcomes.

    Berkeley Law California Constitution Center Executive Director David Carrillo said Wiener’s concern isn’t unfounded. 

    “This has never been done before, and there’s almost no law on this,” he said. 

    Federal lawmakers can make changes to the Constitution through a convention, as long as at least 34 states call for it. State legislatures would still need to approve those changes.

    Carrillo said that there could already be enough calls from states to justify a convention, depending on how they’re counted. 

    “This is a little bit like trying to redo the foundation of your house while you’re still living in it,” he said. “Maybe that goes really well, or maybe the roof falls down on your head.”

    Carrillo said that it’s not clear if a call for a convention can be fully rescinded. Other states, including New York and Illinois, have already voted to rescind theirs. 

    Wiener said the state has seven outstanding calls for a convention. Just last year, Governor Gavin Newsom called for one to address federal gun policy. 

    Some Republican lawmakers, most prominently Republican U.S. Representative Jodey Arrington from Texas, have called for a constitutional convention in recent years.


    CapRadio provides a trusted source of news because of you.  As a nonprofit organization, donations from people like you sustain the journalism that allows us to discover stories that are important to our audience. If you believe in what we do and support our mission, please donate today.


    Donate Today



    In a recent move, State Senator John Smith has proposed legislation aimed at rolling back California’s calls for a constitutional convention. This comes as a response to growing concerns about the potential risks and uncertainties surrounding such a convention.

    Smith argues that a constitutional convention could open the door to far-reaching changes to the state’s constitution, potentially jeopardizing the rights and protections that Californians currently enjoy. He believes that the current constitution, while not perfect, has served the state well and should not be tampered with lightly.

    Supporters of the call for a constitutional convention, however, maintain that it is necessary to address the numerous challenges and issues facing California today. They argue that a convention could provide an opportunity to modernize and improve the state’s governing document, making it more responsive to the needs and demands of its residents.

    As the debate rages on, it remains to be seen whether Senator Smith’s efforts to roll back California’s calls for a constitutional convention will succeed. In the meantime, Californians are left to ponder the potential consequences of such a momentous decision.

    Tags:

    1. California constitutional convention
    2. State senator legislation
    3. California political news
    4. Proposed constitutional amendments
    5. California government updates
    6. State senator initiatives
    7. Constitutional convention debate
    8. California state politics
    9. Legislation review
    10. Calls for constitutional reform in California

    #State #senator #roll #Californias #calls #constitutional #convention

  • Second Year Flashcards: PMBR Evidence, Constitutional Law, & Corporations

    Second Year Flashcards: PMBR Evidence, Constitutional Law, & Corporations



    Second Year Flashcards: PMBR Evidence, Constitutional Law, & Corporations

    Price : 75.00

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    Are you ready to tackle your second year law school subjects with confidence? Look no further than these PMBR flashcards for Evidence, Constitutional Law, and Corporations. With comprehensive coverage of key concepts and principles, these flashcards are the perfect study tool to help you ace your exams.

    Whether you’re struggling to understand the rules of evidence, grappling with complex constitutional law doctrines, or trying to make sense of corporate governance structures, these flashcards have got you covered. Packed with essential information and practice questions, they’ll help you master the material and excel in your classes.

    Don’t wait until the last minute to start studying – get your hands on these PMBR flashcards today and take your second year law school experience to the next level. With these handy study aids in your arsenal, you’ll be well on your way to academic success.
    #Year #Flashcards #PMBR #Evidence #Constitutional #Law #Corporations, Technical Support

Chat Icon