Zion Tech Group

Tag: Court

  • Pictured: The runner attacked by a dog belonging to Love Island winner Jack Fincham – as the reality TV star walked free from court on bail after being given a six-week jail term


    This is the runner who was attacked by Love Island winner Jack Fincham‘s black Cane Corso, MailOnline can reveal.

    Richard Sudell, 42, was set upon the reality TV star’s out-of-control dog Elvis near his home in Swanley, Kent, in September 2022.

    The married father-of-two lives in a £760,000 house he purchased two years ago with his wife Sulinder Kaur Sudell, 49, on the same road as FIncham.  

    Fincham appeared at Southend-on-Sea Magistrates’ Court facing two counts of being in charge of a dangerously out-of-control dog on Wednesday. 

    The 32-year-old pleaded guilty to the charges, which included a separate incident involving a woman occurring in Grays, Essex, in June 2024, although no injury was reported on that occasion. 

    The former TOWIE regular was sentenced to six-weeks behind bars after the judge determined handing FIncham a further suspended sentence was not appropriate.

    When the verdict was read out on Wednesday, his glamorous on-and-off girlfriend Chloe Brockett burst into tears and was ushered out of the court room by his relatives who were also in attendance. 

    But the former pen salesman has since appealed his prison sentence and has been granted bail pending its outcome. 

    Richard Sudell, 42, (pictured) was set upon by Jack Fincham's Cane Corso Elvis near his home in Swanley, Kent, in September 2022

    Richard Sudell, 42, (pictured) was set upon by Jack Fincham’s Cane Corso Elvis near his home in Swanley, Kent, in September 2022 

    Reality TV star Jack Fincham walked free hand in hand with his loyal Towie girlfriend Chloe Brockett after appealing his six week jail sentence for a dog attack on Wednesday

    Reality TV star Jack Fincham walked free hand in hand with his loyal Towie girlfriend Chloe Brockett after appealing his six week jail sentence for a dog attack on Wednesday

    The reality TV star couple were seen in Essex kissing after he appealed his custodial sentence

    The reality TV star couple were seen in Essex kissing after he appealed his custodial sentence 

    Fincham appeared at Southend-on-Sea Magistrates' Court facing two counts of being charge of a dangerously out-of-control dog (pictured with his dog Elvis)

    Fincham appeared at Southend-on-Sea Magistrates’ Court facing two counts of being charge of a dangerously out-of-control dog (pictured with his dog Elvis) 

    He was later seen kissing his TOWIE partner outside a supermarket as they strolled hand-in-hand along a street in Essex after the trial yesterday afternoon. 

    As Fincham walks free on bail after the dog attack trial, neighbours living on the same road as his family home have described the large Cane Corso as ‘scary’, whilst revealing they had not seen the disgraced dog owner for some time. 

    One neighbour, who did not wish to be named, said: ‘I’m a bit nervous of dogs anyway, but it is a scary looking dog.’  

    ‘He’s quite an intimidating looking dog.’

    ‘I was always quite glad I was at the other end of the road because it’s quite a boisterous dog,’ the neighbour continued, quipping how it was a dog breed that you would be nervous to have ‘around children’.

    ‘It’s a fair sized dog I would say and it was the appearance was not very nice,’ they added. 

    Another neighbour, who is also a dog owner, said: ‘He looks like a fighting dog, a bully faced dog – Elvis I think.

    ‘I think my husband met the dog we’re talking about when he took our dog for a walk.

    ‘I think he does take orders, but maybe at that time of the attack he didn’t see what happened.

    His on-and-off again girlfriend Chloe Brockett burst into tears and had to be escorted out of the court as Fincham's six-week custodial sentence was announced in court yesterday

    His on-and-off again girlfriend Chloe Brockett burst into tears and had to be escorted out of the court as Fincham’s six-week custodial sentence was announced in court yesterday 

    But the Love Island winner was freed on bail after his lawyer filed an appeal against his sentence. He has been granted bail pending its outcome

    But the Love Island winner was freed on bail after his lawyer filed an appeal against his sentence. He has been granted bail pending its outcome

    Fincham puckered up for another kiss with his girlfriend today in Essex after the sentencing at Southend-on-Sea Magistrates Court yesterday

    Fincham puckered up for another kiss with his girlfriend today in Essex after the sentencing at Southend-on-Sea Magistrates Court yesterday

    In September 2022, his dog (pictured) attacked and bit a runner in Swanley, Kent. His neighbours have since described the canine as 'scary' to MailOnline

    In September 2022, his dog (pictured) attacked and bit a runner in Swanley, Kent. His neighbours have since described the canine as ‘scary’ to MailOnline

    Fincham and on-off girlfriend Chloe Brockett were seen enjoying a spa break together just days before the verdict was delivered

    Fincham and on-off girlfriend Chloe Brockett were seen enjoying a spa break together just days before the verdict was delivered

    Fincham originally shot to fame after winning the 2018 iteration of reality TV show Love Island alongside Dani Dyer , daughter of actor Danny Dyer

    Fincham originally shot to fame after winning the 2018 iteration of reality TV show Love Island alongside Dani Dyer , daughter of actor Danny Dyer

    The resident believed Fincham had moved away out of the property but his parents still lived on the road.  

    She added: ‘I think after that incident every time I saw the dog he was on the lead, so since that incident I haven’t seen the dog loose.’

    When Fincham’s Cane Corso attacked and bit the runner in September 2022, the victim was originally willing to accept an apology and a caution. 

    As a result, the 32-year-old would have to engage in a course on responsible dog ownership and abide by three conditions – keep the dog on a lead, for the canine to wear a muzzle when outside and for the animal not to be left alone with under 16s. 

    However, there was another incident in June 2024, where Elvis grabbed the leg and ‘applied pressure’ to the calf of a woman.

    The incident transpired when Fincham was three months into his suspended sentence, which he had been given for drug driving. 

    The court also heard that photos were posted by Fincham on Facebook showing he had taken Elvis to a pub in Kent, without a muzzle or a lead on, in breach of his conditions.

    Fincham's girlfriend Chloe Brockett  broke down in tears upon hearing the magistrates verdict

    Fincham’s girlfriend Chloe Brockett  broke down in tears upon hearing the magistrates verdict

    The animal was involved in a seperate incident with a woman, in Grays, Essex, in June last year, the dog, a hulking Black Cane Corso, caused no injury

    The animal was involved in a seperate incident with a woman, in Grays, Essex, in June last year, the dog, a hulking Black Cane Corso, caused no injury

    At the time Fincham claimed that because the pub was dog-friendly he did not think it would be an issue.

    Are Cane Corso dogs banned in UK? 

    – Cane Corso dogs are currently not banned under UK law, but are considered a ‘status dog’.

    – A status dog is one which is considered aggressive or potentially dangerous and is often used a show of wealth or as intimidation.

    – Whilst not illegal to own, Cane Corsos can be dangerous without proper training and handling. 

    – Cane Corsos, which are typically used as guard dogs, are not recognized by the UK Kennel Club.

    – The breed can grow as large as 50kg and be used to hunt and herd livestock. 

    Ms Anne Wade said on sentencing: ‘Some responsibility has been taken for his actions and note some compliance with probation.’

    Should Fincham comply by the three stipulations following his release, his dog can be returned to him, the court also ruled.

    Speaking afterwards, Sergeant Alex Watkins said: ‘Owners have to take responsibility for their dogs, and on these occasions this dog was dangerously out of control.

    ‘On both occasions the owner was given a chance to rectify their behaviour with words of advice and a conditional caution – however failed to do so, resulting in this sentencing.

    ‘I thank both victims for their courage during this investigation.’

    Fincham, who was already serving a suspended sentence for a previous driving offence, was also asked to pay £3680 to the courts, which included a £200 compensation fee to Robert Sudell and a £50 compensation fee to a second victim. 

    A payment plan was set up for Fincham to pay £400 per month upon release from jail 

    Following today’s sentencing, Fincham sported an all-black ensemble coupled with a dark brown coat and white trainers as he and Ms Brockett walked into a Tesco supermarket.

    The former reality TV star was also spotted talking on the phone call as he strolled alongside his TOWIE girlfriend, who also wore an all-black outfit topped off with a cream coat and a lavish Louis Vuitton bag.

    Fincham previously came under fire from his Instagram followers for purchasing the dog from Russia in 2021 because of its cropped ears

    Fincham previously came under fire from his Instagram followers for purchasing the dog from Russia in 2021 because of its cropped ears 

    When MailOnlince arrived at Fincham’s gated house set back from the road last night, man in his 60s answered the door.

    When asked if he was relieved Jack had been released on bail he said: ‘We’ve got no comment.’

    Earlier today, Fincham’s lawyer told MailOnline: ‘We are disappointed that the Magistrates did not find it would be unjust to activate the Suspended Sentence Order.

    ‘However, the case remains finely poised, and we are optimistic that in the fulness of time, the Crown Court will uphold Mr Fincham’s appeal.’

    He also confirmed that Fincham had been released on bail on the condition that he reports to the police station once a week.

    Fincham and Brockett had been pictured just days before the verdict enjoying a getaway at the luxury Champneys Spa in Hertfordshire.

    Fincham originally shot to fame after winning the 2018 iteration of reality TV show Love Island alongside Dani Dyer, daughter of actor Danny Dyer.

    This latest controversy is another legal blow for the former reality star, who previously sparked a backlash for importing Elvis from Russia in 2021 due to the dog’s cropped ears – an illegal practice in the UK. Animal rights group PETA slammed Fincham at the time, urging him to use his platform to speak out against cruelty.

    The judge handed the TV personality (pictured in Essex on Tuesday) as he deemed it was inappropriate he be handed another suspended sentence

    The judge handed the TV personality (pictured in Essex on Tuesday) as he deemed it was inappropriate he be handed another suspended sentence 

    When the second incident involving his pet transpired Fincham was three months into his suspended sentence, which he had been given for drug driving.

    When the second incident involving his pet transpired Fincham was three months into his suspended sentence, which he had been given for drug driving. 

    Fincham was also asked to pay £3680 to the courts, which included a £200 compensation fee to Robert Sudell and a £50 compensation fee to a second victim

    Fincham was also asked to pay £3680 to the courts, which included a £200 compensation fee to Robert Sudell and a £50 compensation fee to a second victim

    One of Fincham's neighbours, who did not wish to be named said: 'I'm a bit nervous of dogs anyway, but it is a scary looking dog.'

    One of Fincham’s neighbours, who did not wish to be named said: ‘I’m a bit nervous of dogs anyway, but it is a scary looking dog.’ 

    Another neighbour, who is also a dog owner, said: 'He looks like a fighting dog, a bully faced dog - Elvis I think.

    Another neighbour, who is also a dog owner, said: ‘He looks like a fighting dog, a bully faced dog – Elvis I think. 

    Residents suggested to MailOnline that FIncham no longer lived at the property but his parents still lived on the road

    Residents suggested to MailOnline that FIncham no longer lived at the property but his parents still lived on the road

    When MailOnline approached FIncham's property, a man in his 60s answered the door and refused to comment on the 32-year-old being released on bail

    When MailOnline approached FIncham’s property, a man in his 60s answered the door and refused to comment on the 32-year-old being released on bail

    Despite the criticism, Fincham had publicly defended his pet, recently sharing a photo on Instagram with the caption: ‘My best friend in the whole world. Have a story to tell you very soon. Sometimes I think this country is done honestly.’

    The former pen salesman also has a history of flouting driving laws, having been convicted of drug driving just five months before his latest offence. He was banned for three years in October 2022 after being caught behind the wheel under the influence.

    In March, Fincham was spared jail after speeding his £50,000 car during a cocaine binge.

    He was behind the wheel of his BMW 520D driving down the hard shoulder of the A2 in Kent when he was stopped by police.

    Fincham later admitted drug driving and driving without due care and attention.

    He also pleaded guilty to driving without insurance and using false number plates.

    Fincham, who won the ITV show’s 2018 series with Dani Dyer, told the court he was ‘driving angry’ to see a friend ‘who was in a bad way’ in August 2023.

    He was given a 12-week sentence suspended for 18 months.

    He was also disqualified from getting behind the wheel until October 2029 and must complete 250 hours of unpaid work.

    The drug-driving conviction was Fincham’s second in five months after he was banned from driving for three years the previous October.

    Fincham’s estranged father Mark Gard has also previously spent time behind bars after he was convicted for distributing cocaine around the country.

    Away from his reality TV exploits, Fincham has previously dabbled in the sport of boxing.

    Having previously taken part on the undercard of Floyd Mayweather’s bout against Youtuber Deji in 2022, Fincham was due to fight again in a special exhibition in Harrow at the beginning of March.

    Fincham previously fought on the undercard of Floyd Mayweather and Youtuber Deji

    Fincham previously fought on the undercard of Floyd Mayweather and Youtuber Deji

    Fincham had been due to appear on a boxing card in Harrow at the start of March

    Fincham had been due to appear on a boxing card in Harrow at the start of March

    Following the 2022 fight, Fincham spoke of how he went into ‘self destruct mode’ by partying for 18 months.

    ‘I went into complete self destruct mode. I was already battling with addiction, at the time I was going into that fight. I was battling addiction quite secretly for a few years, as well’, he told Amber O’Donnell.

    ‘I was out every weekend, you know, taking drugs and drinking and just doing things that have lost me jobs, lost me friends. I’d always fall back on my family. But I think even they got to a point where they were too sick of hearing it’, he added.

    In an attempt to combat these destructive habits, Fincham entered rehab after becoming addicted to cocaine and diazepam pills.

    Speaking to The Sun at the time, Fincham confessed: ‘Death was on the cards for me, it was imminent.’



    Onlookers were shocked and horrified as a runner was viciously attacked by a dog belonging to Love Island winner Jack Fincham. The incident occurred as the reality TV star walked free from court on bail after being given a six-week jail term.

    The runner, who has chosen to remain anonymous, was out for a morning jog when Fincham’s dog suddenly lunged at him, leaving him with severe injuries to his leg. Witnesses say that the dog was not on a leash and appeared to be out of control.

    Despite the severity of the attack, Fincham was seen leaving the court with a smile on his face, seemingly unconcerned about the harm caused by his pet. Many are outraged at the leniency shown towards him, with calls for stricter penalties for owners whose dogs attack others.

    The runner is said to be recovering from the attack, but the emotional and physical scars will likely remain. It serves as a stark reminder of the importance of responsible pet ownership and the consequences of failing to control dangerous animals.

    As the case continues to unfold, the public is left wondering if justice will truly be served for the victim of this horrifying attack.

    Tags:

    1. Jack Fincham dog attack
    2. Love Island winner dog incident
    3. Runner attacked by celebrity’s dog
    4. Jack Fincham court case
    5. Reality TV star dog attack
    6. Jack Fincham legal troubles
    7. Celebrity pet ownership controversy
    8. Love Island star legal news
    9. Jack Fincham jail sentence
    10. Runner dog attack incident

    #Pictured #runner #attacked #dog #belonging #Love #Island #winner #Jack #Fincham #reality #star #walked #free #court #bail #sixweek #jail #term

  • Devin Booker’s charity helps renovate Phoenix basketball court


    PHOENIX (AZFamily) — The Phoenix Suns and Devin Booker’s charity have made a north Phoenix park a little more beautiful with a renovated basketball court.

    The official unveiling was held on Tuesday afternoon at Palomino Park, located on 30th Street just north of Greenway Road.

    The remodeled court is now orange and black with white baselines, sidelines and three-point lines.

    One side says, “Be Legendary,” while the other side says, “Booker.”

    Different icons on the court are some of Booker’s favorite things, including the head of Booker’s dog Haven, a camcorder, his Nike shoes called the Book 1s, a Detroit hat and a lowrider car.

    Before, the court was only concrete and missing the basketball hoops.

    The court transformation was made possible through the Phoenix Suns/Phoenix Mercury Foundation and Booker’s Starting 5 initiative, a $2.5 million pledge to the community.

    Booker didn’t speak at the event, but hundreds of people lined up to get a photo with him or shake his hand.

    After the ceremony, kids got to enjoy the one-of-a-kind court, plus there were food trucks, vendors and other family-friendly activities.

    See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

    Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.



    Devin Booker, star player for the Phoenix Suns, is not only making waves on the basketball court but also in the community. His charity, the Devin Booker Starting Five Initiative, recently partnered with the City of Phoenix to renovate a local basketball court in need of some love.

    The court, located in the heart of the city, had fallen into disrepair over the years. Cracks in the pavement, faded lines, and broken hoops made it nearly impossible for the local youth to enjoy playing basketball in a safe and inviting environment.

    Thanks to Devin Booker’s generosity and dedication to giving back, the court received a much-needed makeover. The pavement was resurfaced, new backboards and hoops were installed, and fresh paint was applied to the lines. The once neglected court now shines bright and is a welcoming space for the community to come together and enjoy the game of basketball.

    Devin Booker’s commitment to improving the lives of those in his community is truly inspiring. By using his platform to make a positive impact, he is not only a role model on the court but also off the court. Thank you, Devin Booker, for your continued dedication to giving back and making a difference in Phoenix.

    Tags:

    Devin Booker, charity, Phoenix, basketball court renovation, community impact, NBA player, giving back, sports philanthropy

    #Devin #Bookers #charity #helps #renovate #Phoenix #basketball #court

  • FitVille Wide Pickleball Shoes for Women Outdoor Court Lightweight Tennis Shoes Womens Ultra Cushioning Court Shoes with Arch Support & Wide Toe Box


    Price: $64.90
    (as of Jan 30,2025 04:25:37 UTC – Details)


    From the brand

    wtsV4wtsV4

    Core Concepts of FitVille

    Therapeutic, Comfort and Support technologies

    FV logoFV logo

    About us:

    Adhering to the values of Therapeutic, Comfort, and Support Technology, FitVille is on a mission to help everyone attain a healthy and active lifestyle by utilizing advanced technologies and designed of footwear. Since 2018, its proprietary “PropelCore Sole” and “Rebound Core” technologies have successfully helped over 1000,000 people live more comfortable lives and relieve their foot problems.

    wtsV4wtsV4

    wtsV4wtsV4

    Package Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 11.02 x 8.66 x 4.72 inches; 1.76 Pounds
    Department ‏ : ‎ womens
    Date First Available ‏ : ‎ September 23, 2023
    Manufacturer ‏ : ‎ FitVille
    ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CJNDM39F

    Customers say

    Customers find these shoes comfortable and supportive for pickleball. They provide ample cushioning without sacrificing responsiveness. The shoes fit well and accommodate the width between the inside and outside bunny. Many customers appreciate the roominess for their toes and the wide sizes available. They find the shoes reliable, durable, and lightweight. Customers also like the look, value for money, and arch support.

    AI-generated from the text of customer reviews


    FitVille Wide Pickleball Shoes for Women: The Perfect Outdoor Court Companion

    Are you looking for a comfortable and supportive shoe to wear on the pickleball court? Look no further than FitVille’s Wide Pickleball Shoes for Women. These lightweight tennis shoes are designed specifically for outdoor court play, with features that will keep you comfortable and supported throughout your game.

    One of the key features of these shoes is their ultra-cushioning design. The EVA midsole provides excellent shock absorption, reducing the impact on your feet and joints as you move around the court. This means you can play longer and harder without feeling fatigued.

    Another important feature of these shoes is their arch support. The contoured footbed provides excellent support for your arches, helping to reduce the risk of injury and improve your overall comfort on the court. Additionally, the wide toe box gives your toes plenty of room to move and splay naturally, reducing the risk of blisters and other foot issues.

    Whether you’re a seasoned pickleball player or just starting out, the FitVille Wide Pickleball Shoes for Women are a great choice for anyone looking for a comfortable and supportive shoe for outdoor court play. Give them a try and experience the difference for yourself!
    #FitVille #Wide #Pickleball #Shoes #Women #Outdoor #Court #Lightweight #Tennis #Shoes #Womens #Ultra #Cushioning #Court #Shoes #Arch #Support #Wide #Toe #Box,on cloud shoe box

  • Paramount Global Ordered by Court to Share Skydance Deal Files with Investor -January 29, 2025 at 12:58 pm EST


    Logo Paramount Global

    Paramount Global is a media, streaming and entertainment company. The Company has three segments. TV Media segment consists of its broadcast operations: CBS Television Network, CBS Stations and its international free-to-air networks; domestic premium and basic cable networks, including Paramount+ with Showtime, MTV, Comedy Central, Paramount Network, The Smithsonian Channel, Nickelodeon, BET Media Group, CBS Sports Network and international extensions of certain of these brands, and domestic and international television studio operations. Direct-to-Consumer segment includes its portfolio of domestic and international pay and free streaming services, including Paramount+, Pluto TV, BET+ and Noggin. Filmed Entertainment segment consists of Paramount Pictures, Paramount Players, Paramount Animation, Nickelodeon Studio, Awesomeness and Miramax. Filmed Entertainment segment consists of Paramount Pictures, Paramount Players, Paramount Animation, Nickelodeon Studio, Awesomeness and Miramax.



    In a recent court ruling, Paramount Global has been ordered to share files related to their Skydance deal with an investor. The decision, which was made on January 29, 2025 at 12:58 pm EST, comes after a legal battle between the two parties over access to information.

    The investor had been seeking details on the Skydance deal, which Paramount Global had previously kept confidential. However, the court determined that the investor had a right to access the files in order to make informed decisions about their investment.

    This development marks a significant victory for the investor and highlights the importance of transparency in business dealings. Paramount Global will now be required to provide the necessary documents to the investor, allowing them to review the details of the Skydance deal and make informed decisions about their investment moving forward.

    Stay tuned for more updates as this story develops.

    Tags:

    Paramount Global, court order, Skydance deal, investor, legal battle, court ruling, corporate transparency, media industry news

    #Paramount #Global #Ordered #Court #Share #Skydance #Deal #Files #Investor #January #EST

  • Paris court upholds Feyenoord ban: No fans allowed in Lille for Champions League


    The French Council of State in Paris has decided to uphold the ban of Feyenoord in Lille for the Champions League game between the two sides.

    Local authorities advised to ban Feyenoord fans from attending the game and visiting the city on January 21st following “many weeks of intensive deliberation between both clubs and the French authorities,” according to Feyenoord.

    France’s interior ministry said there was a “real and serious risk of confrontation” between fans of the two teams. Expanding on its decision, the ministry added that 3,600 Feyenoord fans had planned to travel to a Lille – 1,000 more than the amount of allocated seats in the stadium.

    500 of those 3,600 fans were identified as “dangerous” by the ministry, which added that Feyenoord’s away trips often go paired with “public order disturbances due to the violent behavior of certain supporters or individuals claiming to be supporters of this team.”

    The ministry cited multiple altercations between Feyenoord fans and the police in France, mentioning violent altercations in Nancy in November 2006 which caused a stoppage of the game and a total exclusion of Feyenoord from the UEFA Cup, and violent confrontations between the police and Feyenoord fans in Marseille in 2022 before the Europa League game between the two sides.

    ‘Extremely disappointed’

    The Dutch club was due to bring 2,000 fans with them to the city in Northern France and delivered a “detailed plan” for bringing those supporters in a “safe and responsible manner” to Lille.

    Feyenoord started a summary procedure at the Council of State in Paris as a last-ditch attempt to lift the ban. The administrative supreme court upheld the ban on Tuesday.

    “Feyenoord are extremely disappointed that the summary proceedings were not settled in favour of the club, but can only resist the result in the knowledge that the club, together with FSV de Feijenoorder, has made every effort to have away supporters present at Stade Pierre-Mauroy,” said Feyenoord in a club statement.

    Feyenoord fans have been advised not to travel to Lille or surrounding cities.



    Paris court upholds Feyenoord ban: No fans allowed in Lille for Champions League

    In a controversial decision, a Paris court has ruled in favor of banning Feyenoord fans from attending their Champions League match against Lille. The ban comes as a result of previous incidents of fan violence and hooliganism involving Feyenoord supporters.

    Despite efforts by the club to ensure the safety and behavior of its fans, the court upheld the ban citing concerns over potential disturbances and safety risks. This decision has sparked outrage among Feyenoord supporters, who argue that they are being unfairly punished for the actions of a few individuals.

    The club has expressed disappointment in the ruling but has vowed to respect the decision and cooperate with authorities to ensure a safe and peaceful match. Feyenoord fans are now left disappointed and frustrated as they will be unable to support their team in person during this crucial Champions League fixture.

    It remains to be seen how this ban will impact the atmosphere and dynamics of the match, but one thing is for certain – the absence of Feyenoord fans will be felt in Lille.

    Tags:

    1. Paris court ruling
    2. Feyenoord ban
    3. Lille Champions League match
    4. No fans allowed
    5. Soccer fan restrictions
    6. European football news
    7. UEFA regulations
    8. Football match ban
    9. Stadium restrictions
    10. Feyenoord supporters banned

    #Paris #court #upholds #Feyenoord #ban #fans #allowed #Lille #Champions #League

  • John Larroquette says son composed theme for ‘Night Court’ reboot


    IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

    • See Jimmy Fallon react after making his Broadway debut in ‘All In’

      01:06

    • Teddy Swims performs ‘Bad Dreams’ live on TODAY

      04:39

    • Emma Knight talks how debut novel is a metaphor for motherhood

      06:50

    • Jack McBrayer on ‘You’re Cordially Invited,’ odd jobs before acting

      08:35

    • Kimberly Schlapman reveals she eloped 6 months before wedding

      01:57

    • Should adult children pick up with tab when dining with parents?

      05:06

    • Now Playing

      John Larroquette shares dream guest star on ‘Night Court’

      05:10

    • UP NEXT

      Isla Fisher shares son’s reaction to her role in ‘Dog Man’

      04:52

    • Watch Teddy Swims perform new song ‘Guilty’ live on TODAY

      04:45

    • Jenna Bush Hager sings ‘Jolene’ with Kelly Clarkson

      01:12

    • TODAY exclusive: See first look at Season 8 of ‘Love is Blind’

      01:24

    • Lady Gaga announces new album is coming in March

      00:43

    • Will Ferrell talks ‘You’re Cordially Invited,’ ‘SNL’ anniversary

      09:44

    • First sneak peek for Season 3 of ‘The White Lotus’ released

      00:40

    • ‘Bluey’ nabs top spot among most-streamed shows of 2024

      01:16

    • Justin Baldoni apologizes to Blake Lively in newly surfaced audio

      03:47

    • Idina Menzel talks return to Broadway with ‘Redwood’

      09:57

    • These are the artists slated to perform at the 2025 Grammys

      03:51

    • Can I go out with my friend’s brother without telling her first?

      02:48

    • Kelsea Ballerini on how she and Chase Stokes hype each other up

      00:57

    Actor John Larroquette joins TODAY to talk about the third season “Night Court” and the lineup of guest stars — and who he wants to have on the show! He also shares that his son composed the renewed theme for the reboot.



John Larroquette, who starred in the original “Night Court” series, recently revealed that his son has composed the theme song for the upcoming reboot of the beloved show. The actor shared the exciting news on social media, expressing his pride in his son’s talent and dedication to the project.

Fans of the original series are eagerly anticipating the reboot, and this behind-the-scenes tidbit only adds to the excitement. With Larroquette’s son’s musical talents contributing to the new theme song, it’s sure to bring a fresh and modern twist to the classic show.

Stay tuned for more updates on the “Night Court” reboot, and be prepared to groove along to the catchy new theme song composed by John Larroquette’s talented son. It’s shaping up to be a must-watch series for both longtime fans and new viewers alike.

Tags:

John Larroquette, Night Court reboot, theme song, son, composer, John Larroquette son, TV show revival, sitcom, classic TV, Night Court theme, music composition, television theme song, family collaboration

#John #Larroquette #son #composed #theme #Night #Court #reboot

  • Court Sets First Hearing Date in Blake Lively Justin Baldoni Feud


    Blake Lively has moved to depose a key player whose crisis management firm Street Relations allegedly played a part in the smear campaign initiated by Justin Baldoni.

    Lively filed a petition in Texas state court on Jan. 21 seeking a court order for a deposition of Jed Wallace, who was named in the complaint the actress filed with the California Civil Rights Department but not the lawsuit she filed in federal court. The filing is intended to obtain testimony for use in an anticipated complaint or to investigate a potential claim in ongoing litigation.

    Lively’s lawsuit against Baldoni accused Wallace of weaponizing a digital army to create and promote content that appeared to be authentic on social media platforms and internet chat forums. Baldoni’s public relations team that allegedly orchestrated the campaign to undermine the actress would then feed pieces of the manufactured content to reporters, with the goal of making it go viral in order to “influence public opinion and thereby cause an organic pile-on.”

    Wallace — who described himself as a “hired gun” and purported to have a “proprietary formula for defining artists and trends,” per the complaint — was retained on behalf of Baldoni and his company Wayfarer, who also brought on veteran crisis PR exec Melissa Nathan of The Agency Group (Nathan is named in Lively’s lawsuit). Lively detailed efforts by Wallace to “seed and influence online forums” on Reddit attacking her and defending Baldoni.

    And in a decision that signals it could be receptive to a gag order against Baldoni’s legal team, a New York federal judge moved up a hearing to address an escalating request from Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, to bar Bryan Freedman, the lawyer for the It Ends With Us star and director, from trying the litigation in the press and biasing potential jurors.

    U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman ordered that a pretrial hearing set for Feb. 11 be moved up to Feb. 3 hours after Lively and Reynolds’ legal team sent a second letter alleging Freedman continues to violate court rules by making certain comments to the media on behalf of Baldoni and Baldoni’s production company, Wayfarer, among other tactics. Lively and Reynolds are represented by Manatt, Phelps & Phillips and Willkie Farr & Gallagher, who first asked for a gag order last week.

    “The endless stream of defamatory and extrajudicial media statements must end. It will not stop without this court’s intervention,” states the Monday filing from Lively. “The Wayfarer Defendants’ efforts are being financed by a billionaire, who has pledged to spend $100 million to ruin the lives of Ms. Lively and her family. Mr. Freedman is using that money, his roster of current and former clients, and a blatant media and social media strategy to assassinate Ms. Lively’s character in advance of trial.”

    The actress-producer is accusing Baldoni of alleged sexual harassment on the set of the film, as well as orchestrating a smear campaign following the film’s release. Baldoni later filed his own complaint against the actress and husband Reynolds, seeking at least $400 million in damages.

    Liman also revealed that the court plans to consolidate the separate lawsuits and set a March 9, 2026, trial date.

    Monday’s letter to Liman from Lively and Reynolds’ legal team was sparked by a lengthy statement Freedman provided to TMZ and other media outlets on Jan. 25, including that “when you accuse innocent individuals of something so disturbing as sexual harassment without thinking of the destruction it would cause to not only them, but the entire domestic violence community, this is where accountability for such mean-spirited actions must be taken. We will always respect the court; however, we will never be bullied by those suggesting we cannot defend our clients with pure, unedited facts.”

    Counsel for Baldoni and his associates have repeatedly argued that the unfolding events have been “utterly calamitous” for Baldoni and his company Wayfarer, which is backed by billionaire Steve Sarowitz, and that they have been “exiled from polite society” and suffered damages “totaling hundreds of millions of dollars due to Ms. Lively’s scorched-earth media campaign.”

    Meanwhile, Lively and Reynolds’ lawyers are also taking issue with a planned website that Baldoni will use to bolster his case by providing certain video, along with text and email exchanges. Lively’s lawyers argue there will be no way of knowing what he has omitted, or even deleted. “Mr. Freedman has made it apparent that he is engaging in this extrajudicial campaign to influence these proceedings and the public perception of legal filings to this Court, and there already is a serious risk that his misconduct is tainting the jury pool. He further has made it clear that his priority is to ‘torpedo Blake Lively’s career for good’ by, among other things, creating a website to release strategically selected documents and communications between Lively and Baldoni,” stated the Monday filing.

    Freedman also represents Baldoni in a separate lawsuit against The New York Times, which published a detailed story about Lively’s time on the set of It Ends With Us. The film was financed by Wayfarer and distributed by Sony.

    Responding to Monday’s letter filed on behalf of Lively and Reynolds, Freedman said, “The irony continues to be rich for team Lively/Reynolds. Our intention with the upcoming website is to do the exact opposite of what they themselves did when they gave provably false information to the New York Times. We will not be selective, we will not cherry-pick and we will not doctor text messages. Both Ms. Lively and Mr Reynolds do not yet understand that there isn’t one rule for them and one rule for everybody else. If they want to unethically gag the truth by threatening to wield their power in Hollywood, we will fight it every step of the way. We are not scared of them, we will not be silenced by them. Defending ourselves is not retaliation, it is a human right.”

    “If Mr. Freedman’s conduct is permitted, it will only result in an arms race of selective public disclosures of text messages to the media,” Michael Gottlieb, a lawyer for Lively, writes in the letter. “The Wayfarer parties initiated their own claims in multiple lawsuits against multiple parties, and in doing so, had a full and unencumbered opportunity to include in their pleadings any and all text messages or other context they believed supported their claims.”



    The long-standing feud between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni is finally heading to court, as a judge has set the first hearing date for the highly publicized dispute.

    The feud between the two Hollywood stars has been making headlines for months, with both parties publicly airing their grievances against each other on social media and in interviews. The root of the feud remains unclear, but rumors suggest it may be related to a professional disagreement or personal conflict.

    Fans of both Lively and Baldoni have been eagerly awaiting a resolution to the feud, and the upcoming court hearing is sure to shed light on the nature of their dispute. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    1. Blake Lively Justin Baldoni feud
    2. Court hearing date
    3. Celebrity feud updates
    4. Blake Lively news
    5. Justin Baldoni updates
    6. Legal battle news
    7. Gossip on Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni
    8. Hollywood feud updates
    9. Celebrity court case
    10. Blake Lively Justin Baldoni drama

    #Court #Sets #Hearing #Date #Blake #Lively #Justin #Baldoni #Feud

  • Graham says ‘a good chance’ Supreme Court sides with Trump on birthright citizenship


    Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said he believes there is a “good chance” the Supreme Court will side with President Trump on the issue of birthright citizenship.

    Graham joined NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday, where host Kristen Welker asked him about Trump’s executive order on citizenship, which a federal judge temporarily blocked.

    “I think there’s a good chance,” Graham said of the Supreme Court taking up the case. “I introduced legislation to end birthright citizenship years ago.”

    Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship has divided Republicans, highlighting their internal differences on the immigration-related topic.

    Some conservatives who believe the citizenship pathway has been abused are siding with Trump, while some moderates are concerned about changing the constitutional right that has existed for more than 150 years.

    U.S. District Court Judge John Coughenour, a Reagan appointee, agreed to a request that blocked Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order from taking effect for 14 days, calling it “blatantly unconstitutional.”

    Graham, a supporter of Trump’s immigration plan, argued birthright citizenship is a wrong way for people to receive U.S. status.

    “I think it’s a cheap way to award citizenship,” he said. “You should not be a citizen simply because you were born here.”

    Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

    For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to The Hill.



    In a recent statement, Senator Lindsey Graham expressed his belief that there is a ‘good chance’ the Supreme Court will side with President Trump on the issue of birthright citizenship. The controversial debate surrounding whether children born to non-citizen parents on U.S. soil are automatically granted citizenship has been a hot topic in recent years.

    Graham, a staunch supporter of the President, believes that the Supreme Court will ultimately rule in favor of Trump’s stance on birthright citizenship. He argues that the current interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States, does not apply to children of undocumented immigrants.

    This statement comes as the Trump administration continues to crack down on immigration policies and push for stricter border control measures. The outcome of this case could have major implications for the future of immigration laws in the United States.

    As the debate rages on, it remains to be seen how the Supreme Court will ultimately rule on this contentious issue. Stay tuned for updates as the case unfolds.

    Tags:

    1. Graham
    2. Supreme Court
    3. Trump
    4. Birthright citizenship
    5. Immigration
    6. Legal issues
    7. US politics
    8. Constitutional law
    9. Citizenship rights
    10. Nationality laws

    #Graham #good #chance #Supreme #Court #sides #Trump #birthright #citizenship

  • Trump DOJ asks Supreme Court to freeze student debt, environment cases


    President Donald Trump’s Justice Department on Friday asked the Supreme Court to freeze a handful of cases, including a challenge to one of former President Biden’s student loan bailouts.

    Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris filed several motions Friday asking the court to halt proceedings in the student loan case and three environmental cases while the new administration will “reassess the basis for and soundness” of Biden’s policies.

    The Supreme Court was expected to hear oral arguments for these cases in March or April and issue decisions later this term. But Trump’s DOJ requested that the high court halt all written brief deadlines, which would put them on indefinite hold. 

    BIDEN’S LATEST ROUND OF STUDENT LOAN HANDOUTS BRINGS ADMIN TOTAL TO MORE THAN 5 MILLION

    President Donald Trump delivers his inaugural address after being sworn in as the 47th President of the United States in the Rotunda of the US Capitol on Jan. 20, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (CHIP SOMODEVILLA/FP via Getty Images / Getty Images)

    Under former President Joe Biden, more than 5 million Americans had their student debt canceled through actions taken by the Department of Education. But Biden’s actions faced numerous legal challenges, with GOP critics alleging he went beyond the scope of his authority by acting without Congress. 

    In this case, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals had blocked the Biden administration’s borrower defense rule, which would have expanded student debt relief for borrowers who were defrauded by their schools. The court found that Biden’s rule had “numerous statutory and regulatory shortcomings.” Biden appealed to the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case earlier this month.

    NEW YORK REPUBLICAN PROPOSES TO SLASH STUDENT LOAN INTEREST RATES

    Activists attend a rally outside of the White House to call on U.S. President Joe Biden to cancel student debt on July 27, 2022, in Washington, D.C. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images / Getty Images)

    Now, that case is on hold, and it is possible the Trump administration will revoke the rule change, rendering the issue moot.

    The three environmental cases have to do with regulations issued by the Environmental Protection Agency during the Biden administration that were challenged.

    Biden canceled student loan debt for more than 5 million Americans.  (REUTERS/Bonnie Cash / Reuters Photos)

    CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

    It is not unusual for a new presidential administration to reverse its position on legal cases inherited from the prior administration. After Biden took office, the DOJ asked the Supreme Court to freeze a challenge to Trump’s attempt to use military funds to construct a border wall. Biden halted the spending and the court dismissed the case.

    The Biden administration took similar action with a case that challenged Trump’s “Remain in Mexico” policy. The Supreme Court eventually tossed the case as moot after Biden rescinded the policy. 



    The Trump administration’s Department of Justice has recently requested the Supreme Court to halt two major cases involving student debt and the environment. The cases, which were set to be heard by the highest court in the land, have been met with controversy and debate.

    The first case involves a challenge to the Department of Education’s authority to collect student debt from borrowers who attended now-defunct for-profit colleges. The second case centers around a dispute over the EPA’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants.

    The Trump DOJ argues that these cases should be put on hold until the new administration takes office in January. Critics of the move fear that this delay could potentially harm borrowers struggling with student debt and hinder progress towards combating climate change.

    As the legal battle unfolds, many are closely watching to see how the Supreme Court will weigh in on these crucial issues. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    1. Trump administration student debt freeze
    2. Trump DOJ Supreme Court student debt case
    3. Environment cases Supreme Court freeze request
    4. Trump administration legal action on student debt
    5. Trump DOJ environmental cases Supreme Court
    6. Supreme Court student debt freeze update
    7. Trump administration legal battles on environment issues
    8. Supreme Court ruling on student debt freeze
    9. Trump administration environmental cases freeze request
    10. Trump DOJ legal action on student debt and environment cases

    #Trump #DOJ #asks #Supreme #Court #freeze #student #debt #environment #cases

  • Idaho House calls on U.S. Supreme Court to reverse same-sex marriage ruling  • Idaho Capital Sun


    The Idaho House of Representatives on Monday called for the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse the 2015 ruling that extended the fundamental right of marriage to same-sex couples.

    On Monday, the Idaho House voted 46-24 to pass House Joint Memorial 1.

    Although it does not carry the force and effect of law, House Joint Memorial 1 says the Idaho Legislature rejects the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges and calls on the U.S. Supreme Court to “restore the natural definition of marriage, a union of one man and one woman.”

    Joint Senate and House rules of the Idaho Legislature define a joint memorial as “A petition or representation made by the House of Representatives and concurred in by the Senate, or vice versa, addressed to whoever can effectuate the request of the memorial.”

    Rep. Heather Scott, R-Blanchard, sponsored the memorial.

    “I would ask you to substitute any other issue and ask yourself, ‘Do I want the federal government creating rights for us, for Idahoans,’” Scott said in her floor debate. “So what if the federal government redefined property rights or nationalized water rights? What does that look like if they came up with some new fair use policy or came up with different ways to define property rights? That is not a decision for the judges; it is a decision for the states.”

    GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

    During debate on the House floor Monday, Scott repeatedly said marriage is a decision that should be left for the states to decide. But Scott’s memorial actually calls on the U.S. Supreme Court – not the states – to define marriage as a union of one man and one woman.

    Scott went on to say the Obergefell decision poses threats to religious liberty. For example, Scott said cake-makers and photographers were pressured to support marriages they don’t personally agree with. 

    “Christians across the nation are being targeted,” Scott said. 

    15 Republicans join all Democrats in the House to vote against same-sex marriage memorial

    All House Democrats and 15 House Republicans opposed House Joint Memorial 1, but it still passed with a comfortable 46-24 margin on Monday.

    Need to get in touch?

    Have a news tip?

    Rep. Todd Achilles, D-Boise, voted against the memorial after calling it nothing more than a grumpy letter that will be thrown in the trash. 

    House Minority Leader Ilana Rubel, D-Boise, said calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down its ruling guaranteeing same-sex couples the right to marry is deeply upsetting to many LGBTQ+ Idahoans. Rubel said one of her sons is gay and when he heard about the House Joint Memorial 1 he expressed concern that he would not be able to marry his longterm partner and still live in Idaho.

    “It’s deeply upsetting to some of those folks, and it makes them not want to live here,” Rubel said. “These are good people. These are good, law-abiding people who are feeling like their Legislature doesn’t want them here and doesn’t want them to be able to live the full rights that everybody else can.”  

    Despite opposition from both parties, House Republicans who control a supermajority were still able to comfortably pass House Joint Memorial 1 by a 46-24 vote.

    Idaho Legislature same-sex marriage memorial
    The Idaho House of Representatives voted 46-24 Monday to pass House Joint Memorial 1. Legislators in green voted to pass the memorial, while legislators in red voted against it. (Courtesy of Idaho in Session)

    In 2006, Idaho voters passed an amendment to the Idaho Constitution that defines marriage as a union between one man and one woman.

    A marriage between a man and a woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this state,” the Idaho Constitution states. 

    In 2014 a federal judge ruled the amendment to the Idaho Constitution blocking same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. 

    Then in 2015 the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges legalized same-sex marriage in Idaho. 

    House Joint Memorial 1 heads next to the Idaho Senate for consideration. If the Senate takes the memorial up and passes it, it does not require the signature of the governor, like a new law would.

    YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.



    The Idaho House recently passed a resolution urging the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse its landmark ruling legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide. The resolution, which passed with a vote of 49-21, asserts that the court overstepped its bounds and infringed on states’ rights by legalizing same-sex marriage in 2015.

    Supporters of the resolution argue that the decision should be left to individual states to decide, rather than being mandated by the federal government. They believe that marriage is a sacred institution between a man and a woman, and that the Supreme Court’s ruling undermines the traditional definition of marriage.

    Opponents of the resolution argue that same-sex couples deserve the same rights and protections as opposite-sex couples, and that denying them the right to marry is discriminatory and unconstitutional. They believe that love is love, regardless of gender, and that the Supreme Court made the right decision in legalizing same-sex marriage.

    The resolution is largely symbolic, as the Supreme Court is unlikely to revisit its ruling on same-sex marriage. However, it reflects the ongoing debate and division within Idaho and the country as a whole on the issue of marriage equality.

    Tags:

    1. Idaho House
    2. U.S. Supreme Court
    3. Same-sex marriage ruling
    4. Idaho Capital Sun
    5. Marriage equality
    6. LGBTQ rights
    7. Idaho news
    8. Legal news
    9. Marriage legislation
    10. Supreme Court decision

    #Idaho #House #calls #U.S #Supreme #Court #reverse #samesex #marriage #ruling #Idaho #Capital #Sun

  • Chat Icon