Zion Tech Group

Tag: Critique

  • ART AND ITS INSTITUTIONS: CURRENT CONFLICTS, CRITIQUE AND By Nina Montmann Mint

    ART AND ITS INSTITUTIONS: CURRENT CONFLICTS, CRITIQUE AND By Nina Montmann Mint



    ART AND ITS INSTITUTIONS: CURRENT CONFLICTS, CRITIQUE AND By Nina Montmann Mint

    Price : 85.49

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    The relationship between art and its institutions has always been a complex one, fraught with tensions and conflicts. In recent years, however, these tensions have come to the forefront of the art world, with artists, curators, and critics alike questioning the role of institutions in shaping and defining contemporary art.

    In my upcoming book, ART AND ITS INSTITUTIONS: CURRENT CONFLICTS, CRITIQUE AND, I delve into these issues, exploring the ways in which institutions both support and constrain artistic practice. From the impact of funding sources on artistic freedom to the ways in which museums and galleries shape our understanding of art history, I examine the ways in which institutions can be both gatekeepers and enablers of artistic expression.

    Drawing on interviews with artists, curators, and museum directors, as well as my own experiences working in the art world, I offer a nuanced and critical perspective on the role of institutions in shaping the contemporary art landscape. By shining a light on the conflicts and contradictions inherent in the relationship between art and its institutions, I hope to spark a much-needed conversation about how we can create more inclusive and equitable spaces for artistic expression.

    Stay tuned for updates on the release of ART AND ITS INSTITUTIONS: CURRENT CONFLICTS, CRITIQUE AND, and join me in exploring the complex and evolving relationship between art and its institutions.
    #ART #INSTITUTIONS #CURRENT #CONFLICTS #CRITIQUE #Nina #Montmann #Mint, visualization

  • This brutal critique of MrBeast’s Prime Video show is so savage

    This brutal critique of MrBeast’s Prime Video show is so savage


    MrBeast, the online persona of 26-year-old Jimmy Donaldson, is a master content creator. His elaborately staged philanthropic stunt videos have helped him amass almost 340 million subscribers on YouTube, making him the most-followed star on the platform. To his legion of fans, he’s sort of like the Oprah of the internet; he’s funded a surgical procedures and even gifted an island to one of his subscribers. His business empire includes a charitable organization, as well as his Feastables chocolate and snack brand, and he expects to pull in a reported $700 million in revenue this year.

    Behind the glassy-eyed smile, however, lies an increasingly tempting target for detractors who see something inauthentic and kind of strange about his whole schtick. What’s especially brought out their knives is MrBeast’s new cringe- and chaos-filled reality competition series for Prime Video, Beast Games, which reportedly cost more than $100 million — making it the most expensive reality show ever made.

    “There is a cruel ruthlessness to Beast Games that is truly unpalatable,” writes a reviewer for The Guardian, in what might just be the most savage commentary I’ve ever read about MrBeast or a project he’s connected to. “Overwhelmingly,” the writer continues, “the bulk of the challenges take the form of self-sacrifice, where groups of contestants are told that they can’t progress to the next round unless one of them willingly gives up their shot at the prize and leaves the show. The ugliness of these challenges is overbearing. There is endless pleading and crying and full-blown adult tantrums, and all for a jackpot they are statistically unlikely to win.

    “Hand on heart, I can’t remember seeing a more undignified spectacle.”

    The Prime Video show, a Squid Game wannabe which has an abysmal 20% critics’ score on Rotten Tomatoes, involves 1,000 players competing in a series of challenges for a chance to win a $5 million dollar cash prize. It’s very much an extension of MrBeast’s stunt-based charity of recent years, such as a recent video in which he paid for an operation that helped restore the vision of 1,000 blind people. Obviously, that surgery meant the world to those people — but, tone-wise, the video had MrBeast in full YouTuber mode. He giddily explains to the camera what’s about to happen, adding that “It’s gonna be crazy!!!”

    MrBeast, aka Jimmy Donaldson
    MrBeast celebrates the premiere of the new Prime Video competition series “Beast Games” at a content creator special screening on December 18, 2024, in Santa Monica, California. Image source: Jon Kopaloff/Getty Images for Prime Video

    On various platforms, you’ll find users debating notions like (on Reddit): “How Mr Beast’s Charity Content Grossly Exploits Poverty and Why Millionaire Charity Doesn’t Work.” And, via Quora, “Why do many people like Mr. Beast? Is he exploiting a psychological loophole that causes people to enjoy his content?”

    It’s that Guardian review above, however, that fires one vicious broadside after another at the exploitative side of MrBeast and his content — also touching on the 54-page class action lawsuit filed by several contestants against MrBeast’s production company and Amazon, alleging mistreatment, inadequate compensation and “serious emotional distress.” Continues the review: Beast Games largely consists of the “unedifying sight of 1,000 attention seekers embarrassing themselves for the whims of not only a YouTuber, but a YouTuber given to shouting things like, “Everybody has a price!”…

    “True, there is something weirdly compelling about Beast Games, but it is compelling in the same way that picking a scab is. It exists solely to show us the worst of the human condition, as obnoxiously as possible.” 



    I recently watched MrBeast’s Prime Video show and I have to say, I was not impressed. The production quality was low, the challenges were uninspired, and the overall concept felt like a cheap knockoff of other popular YouTube shows.

    The hosts seemed awkward and uncomfortable on camera, and the forced banter between them fell flat. The editing was choppy and jarring, making it difficult to follow the action. And don’t even get me started on the cringeworthy product placements throughout the episodes.

    Overall, I found MrBeast’s Prime Video show to be a disappointing and lackluster addition to the streaming service. If you’re looking for engaging and entertaining content, I would recommend looking elsewhere. This brutal critique of MrBeast’s Prime Video show is so savage, but unfortunately, it’s also true.

    Tags:

    SEO friendly tags for the post:

    1. MrBeast Prime Video show review
    2. Savage critique of MrBeast’s show
    3. Brutal criticism of MrBeast’s Prime Video series
    4. MrBeast show analysis
    5. Review of MrBeast’s latest project
    6. MrBeast Prime Video controversy
    7. Savage review of popular YouTuber’s show
    8. Honest critique of MrBeast’s TV series
    9. MrBeast Prime Video show breakdown
    10. Criticism of MrBeast’s latest content.

    #brutal #critique #MrBeasts #Prime #Video #show #savage

  • Machines and Intelligence: A Critique of Arguments Against the Possibility of Ar

    Machines and Intelligence: A Critique of Arguments Against the Possibility of Ar



    Machines and Intelligence: A Critique of Arguments Against the Possibility of Ar

    Price : 100.23

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    tificial General Intelligence

    Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) refers to the hypothetical future development of a machine that possesses the same level of intelligence and cognitive abilities as a human being. While the idea of creating such a machine has been the subject of much speculation and debate, there are those who argue that it is simply not possible for machines to achieve true intelligence.

    One of the main arguments against the possibility of AGI is the belief that machines lack consciousness and self-awareness, which are essential components of human intelligence. However, this argument overlooks the fact that intelligence is not limited to consciousness and self-awareness. Intelligence can be defined as the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills, and machines are already capable of performing complex tasks that require intelligence, such as playing chess, driving cars, and even engaging in natural language processing.

    Another common argument against AGI is the idea that machines lack creativity and the ability to think outside the box. While it is true that machines operate based on algorithms and predefined rules, this does not necessarily mean that they are incapable of creativity. In fact, there have been instances where machines have generated original and innovative ideas, such as in the field of art and music.

    Furthermore, some critics argue that AGI is a threat to human existence, as machines could potentially surpass human intelligence and pose a danger to society. However, this argument overlooks the fact that the development of AGI would be a gradual process, allowing for ethical considerations and safeguards to be put in place to prevent such scenarios from occurring.

    In conclusion, while there are valid concerns and criticisms surrounding the possibility of AGI, it is important to consider the potential benefits and advancements that could be made through the development of intelligent machines. By reevaluating our understanding of intelligence and acknowledging the capabilities of machines, we can move towards a future where artificial general intelligence is not only possible but also beneficial to society.
    #Machines #Intelligence #Critique #Arguments #Possibility, artificial intelligence

  • What Computers Can’t Do : A Critique of Artificial Reason Hubert

    What Computers Can’t Do : A Critique of Artificial Reason Hubert



    What Computers Can’t Do : A Critique of Artificial Reason Hubert

    Price : 23.57

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    Computers have come a long way in terms of their capabilities and functionality. They can perform complex calculations, process large amounts of data, and even learn from experience through artificial intelligence. However, there are still certain tasks and abilities that computers simply cannot replicate, no matter how advanced their technology becomes.

    One such limitation is the inability of computers to truly understand and interpret human emotions. While computers can be programmed to recognize certain patterns or cues that may indicate emotions, they lack the ability to truly feel and empathize with others. This is a fundamental aspect of human communication and interaction that cannot be replicated by artificial intelligence.

    Additionally, computers struggle with tasks that require creativity, intuition, and subjective judgment. While they can generate new ideas or solutions based on existing data, they cannot truly think outside the box or come up with truly original concepts. This is because creativity often involves a level of unpredictability and randomness that is difficult to replicate in a computer program.

    Furthermore, computers lack the ability to truly understand context and nuance in language and communication. While they can process and analyze text to some extent, they often struggle with understanding the underlying meaning or tone of a message. This can lead to misinterpretations and errors in communication that a human would be able to easily recognize and correct.

    In conclusion, while computers have made great strides in terms of their capabilities and functionality, there are still certain tasks and abilities that they simply cannot replicate. Human emotions, creativity, intuition, and nuanced communication are all aspects of human cognition that computers struggle to emulate. As such, it is important to recognize and appreciate the unique abilities and strengths of human cognition that computers cannot fully replicate.
    #Computers #Critique #Artificial #Reason #Hubert

Chat Icon