Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: Crossroads
Baku rejects Yerevan’s ‘Peace Crossroads’ amid Zangazur Corridor deadlock [OPINION]
Baku rejects Yerevan’s ‘Peace Crossroads’ amid Zangazur Corridor deadlock [OPINION]
On January 28, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev addressed several important issues during a meeting focused on transportation. The main topics included identifying the problems faced by Azerbaijan’s transport infrastructure and discussing potential solutions for their development. An additional topic discussed was the Zangazur Corridor, which has remained unresolved for about five years. This corridor is a commitment made by Armenia in the Trilateral Statement of November 10, 2020. It is important to note that even if Armenia does not agree to the Zangazur Corridor, which holds global significance, it is still required to provide unhindered access to Nakhchivan, which is part of Azerbaijan, as requested by influential external parties.
Access to paid information is limited
Find the plan that suits you best.
1 month subscription
Full digital access to all news for 1 month
3 months subscription
Full digital access to all news for 3 months
-33%
6 months subscription
Full digital access to all news for 6 months
-36%
1 year subscription
Full digital access to all news for 1 year
-41%
Here we are to serve you with news right now. It does not cost much, but worth your attention.
Choose to support open, independent, quality journalism and subscribe on a monthly basis.
By subscribing to our online newspaper, you can have full digital access to all news, analysis, and much more.
Subscribe
You can also follow AzerNEWS on Twitter @AzerNewsAz or Facebook @AzerNewsNewspaper
Thank you!
The recent proposal by Yerevan for a “Peace Crossroads” in the region has been met with rejection by Baku, further deepening the deadlock over the Zangazur Corridor.The proposal, which aimed to create a neutral zone for dialogue and cooperation between Armenia and Azerbaijan, was seen as a potential breakthrough in the ongoing conflict. However, Baku’s rejection of the idea signals a continued reluctance to engage in meaningful peace talks.
The Zangazur Corridor, a key issue in the conflict between the two countries, remains a major point of contention. Azerbaijan views the corridor as essential for connecting its mainland to its exclave of Nakhchivan, while Armenia sees it as a threat to its territorial integrity.
The rejection of the “Peace Crossroads” proposal underscores the deep-rooted distrust and animosity between the two countries, making it increasingly difficult to find a resolution to the conflict. Without a willingness to engage in dialogue and compromise, the prospects for lasting peace in the region remain uncertain.
In conclusion, the rejection of Yerevan’s proposal by Baku highlights the need for both sides to prioritize peace and reconciliation over territorial ambitions. Only through genuine dialogue and cooperation can a lasting solution to the conflict be achieved.
Tags:
- Baku
- Yerevan
- Peace Crossroads
- Zangazur Corridor
- Azerbaijan
- Armenia
- South Caucasus
- International Relations
- Conflict Resolution
- Political Analysis
#Baku #rejects #Yerevans #Peace #Crossroads #Zangazur #Corridor #deadlock #OPINION
With Rays’ stadium deal in jeopardy, owner Stuart Sternberg’s tenure appears headed for a crossroads
Stuart Sternberg of the Tampa Bay Rays is one of baseball’s most successful, impactful owners in the past 20 years. But if Sternberg cannot salvage the Rays’ stadium deal in St. Petersburg, then he should sell the club to a group that would stand a greater chance of getting a park built in Tampa, where the team would be better positioned to thrive.
This is not to shout “Stu must go!” the way one might with other owners, from the Athletics’ John Fisher to the Chicago White Sox’s Jerry Reinsdorf, the Colorado Rockies’ Dick Monfort to the Pittsburgh Pirates’ Bob Nutting to the Los Angeles Angels’ Arte Moreno. Nor is to lament, “Poor Stu,” for an owner who is sitting on $600 million of public funding for a new park, and in the wake of two devastating hurricanes in the Tampa Bay region, wanting more.
Sternberg’s tenure, however, appears headed for a crossroads. His team lost its current ballpark for at least the 2025 season when Hurricane Milton blew the roof off of Tropicana Field on Oct. 9. And the Rays’ deal for a new park on the same site is in jeopardy as Sternberg and other club officials clamor for more money to cover possible cost overruns.
Time is running short. The Rays must meet specific funding and design requirements by March 31 for Pinellas County to issue the necessary bonds for its $312.5 million contribution to the new park. And MLB commissioner Rob Manfred does not want the team to relocate out of the market, repeating to The Athletic what he has said numerous times publicly: “My goal is to make baseball work in the Tampa Bay region.”
A look at Tropicana Field shortly after the destructive damage from Hurricane Milton in October 2024. (Joe Raedle / Getty Images)Manfred declined further comment. Sternberg declined comment entirely. And while Manfred’s lobbying of the county commissioners to approve financing last month could be interpreted as putting the politicians on notice that the team could bolt, he is taking a different approach with Sternberg than he did with Fisher and the A’s.
The two situations are not identical.
• Tampa-St. Pete is a vibrant market in a fast-growing state. The A’s were second-class citizens in the Bay Area, which at the time was the smallest two-team market in baseball.
• The Rays have a ballpark deal in place with their city and county. The league concluded, justifiably or not, that no deal was possible in Oakland, clearing Fisher to leave for Las Vegas.
• An out-of-state relocation prompted in part by a natural disaster would be unseemly, and perhaps unwarranted. Another owner, one with deeper pockets, might be more successful than Sternberg was in persuading officials in neighboring Tampa and Hillsborough County to finance a new ballpark. Fisher is investing $1 billion into the construction of the Vegas park. Sternberg is at $700 million with his project and does not want to go higher.
Another factor: Manfred might not be comfortable with a second team relocating to a market in which the league might want to expand. The A’s took away one such market, and while the league did not charge Fisher a relocation fee, it instituted a 10-year flip tax to penalize him if he used the relocation to sell the club at an inflated price. If Fisher sells before 2029, he will be taxed 20 percent of the purchase price, to be split among the other owners, according to a source briefed on the details. The tax would decrease each year through 2033.
Unlike with the A’s, the league considers Tampa Bay too valuable to vacate for say, Nashville or Raleigh-Durham, even if Sternberg’s best chance of extracting maximum value in a sale is in one of those markets. The problem is, Sternberg does not seem especially welcome in either Tampa or St. Pete. Which is unfortunate, considering how he transformed his franchise from a laughingstock into the envy of small-market and even large-market clubs.
The Rays are a modern baseball miracle, ranking sixth in the majors in wins since Sternberg became managing general partner in October 2005. They’ve played in the 2008 and 2020 World Series, developed innovative strategies, populated the sport with top executives. And they accomplished all this while routinely running bottom-five payrolls and ranking in the bottom four in attendance every year since 2010.
Before the hurricane, Sternberg was on track for arguably his biggest achievement yet — the end of the Rays’ 17-year quest for a new park. But the storm was the initial trigger for the county commissioners to postpone their approval of financing. The delay, in the Rays’ view, pushed back the proposed opening of the new park from 2028 to ‘29, creating financial consequences for the club, which is responsible for cost overruns.
The team, in a letter to the county commissioners on Nov. 19, said, “A 2029 delivery would result in significantly higher costs that we are not able to absorb alone.” Sternberg told the Tampa Bay Times: “Last month, the County Commission upended our ballpark agreement by not approving their bonds, as they promised to do. That action sent a clear message that we had lost the county as a partner. The future of baseball in Tampa Bay became less certain after that vote.”
The Rays pledged $700 million to the construction of the park before any overruns, and have not specified how much more they desire. They already expect to generate lower revenues for at least this season while playing at the Yankees’ spring training stadium in Tampa. Waiting one more year for the construction of their new park would mean waiting one more year for the greater revenues the new facility would provide.
The delay in the county’s approval, however, turned out to be only seven weeks. The city of St. Petersburg approved bonds to finance its $287.5 million contribution in the interim. Whether the park in St. Pete still could open by 2028 is debatable. But coming in the aftermath of the hurricane, Sternberg’s aggressive posture did not endear him to the county commissioners. One said he withdrew his opposition to the project only after a conversation with Manfred.
“While I do not trust the owner of the Rays, I trust Mr. Manfred. He is the reason I am voting yes,” county commissioner Chris Latvala said after the financing passed on Dec. 17.
Other officials also went public with their distaste for Sternberg, damaging the team’s reputation as it tries to do business in the community and further souring the relationship between the two sides, according to a Rays official who was granted anonymity for his candor. (The inability of the Rays to play at Tropicana Field this season automatically extended the team’s lease by one year, through 2028.)
Tampa officials also are said to be lukewarm toward Sternberg. An effort in 2017 to build a park in Tampa’s Ybor City area never came to fruition. Nor did Sternberg’s proposal to split the Rays’ home games between Tampa and Montreal, an idea the league quashed in 2022 and amounted to another failed attempt, even if the decision was beyond Sternberg’s control.
So, if Sternberg can’t complete a ballpark deal in either city and the league doesn’t want to lose the market, the logical solution is for him to sell to interests in Tampa who could get the Ybor City park built, once and for all. Potential buyers in Tampa exist, according to sources who are briefed on the matter but would not reveal the identities of the likely bidders. Sternberg periodically has engaged in sale conversations. The question is whether he could get his price.
Sternberg led a partnership that bought the Rays for a reported $200 million in 2004. Forbes last March valued the team at $1.25 billion, fourth-lowest in the league. The uncertainty over where the Rays will play if Tropicana Field is not repaired by 2026 might dampen the enthusiasm of potential buyers. Sternberg also might factor into the price the 1/30th share he or a new owner would receive once the league expands by two teams. If the expansion fee for each club is $2 billion, each of the existing teams would receive about $133 million.
The proposed ballpark in St. Petersburg is part of a $6.5 billion redevelopment project that also is part of Sternberg’s financial equation. Even if the ballpark deal collapses, the Rays and their real-estate partner Hines still might control the redevelopment project, adding another level of complexity to the overall picture.
Getting a ballpark built is never easy. The hurricane only added to the Rays’ degree of difficulty. And even if the park in St. Pete gets done, who’s to say the Rays won’t end up like the Miami Marlins, locked into a 30-year commitment in a city where they have yet to succeed? Sternberg, a native of Brooklyn who now lives in St. Pete, seems to be one of the few who believes baseball can work in his adopted city.
Then again, maybe Sternberg knows better. Brian Scott, chairman of the Pinellas County commissioners, said in November he believed it was possible the Rays were looking for a way out of the ballpark deal. It would be the most cynical of plays. But considering all the Rays are up against — the financial damage caused by the hurricane, the potential increase in the cost of the new park, the loss of rare positive momentum — it would be understandable if Sternberg was having second thoughts.
The team’s experience at George M. Steinbrenner Field in Tampa this season might be telling. The capacity of the park is only 11,026. Many fans might be excited to see a major-league product in an intimate minor-league setting. But if the Rays generate greater buzz in Tampa than they do in St. Petersburg, it will only reinforce the perception that they have spent nearly three decades playing in the wrong city.
Sternberg’s past and present employees swear by him. The team’s performance reflects well on him. If somehow the Rays can bridge the funding gap — through corporate support, government support, whatever it takes — perhaps this whole thing still could work. If not, then Sternberg should get out, and sell to an ownership group willing to make a greater investment and negotiate a ballpark deal in Tampa. It might be the best outcome for all.
(Top photo of Stu Sternberg in September 2023: Chris O’Meara / Associated Press)
The future of the Tampa Bay Rays’ stadium deal is uncertain, and with it, owner Stuart Sternberg’s tenure with the team is at a crossroads. The proposed stadium deal, which would have seen the Rays move to a new stadium in Ybor City, has hit a roadblock, leaving the team’s future in limbo.Sternberg, who has been the owner of the Rays since 2005, has been vocal about the need for a new stadium in order to keep the team competitive. However, with the current deal in jeopardy, it seems that Sternberg’s vision for the team’s future may be in danger.
If the stadium deal falls through, it could have significant implications for the Rays and for Sternberg. The team may be forced to consider other options, such as relocating to a different city or staying in their current stadium, which is widely considered to be outdated.
As the owner of the team, Sternberg will likely face tough decisions in the coming months as he navigates the uncertain future of the Rays. Whether he can find a solution to the stadium issue and secure the team’s long-term future remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: his tenure with the Rays is at a crossroads.
Tags:
- Rays stadium deal
- Stuart Sternberg
- Tampa Bay Rays
- MLB stadium negotiations
- Sports team ownership
- Baseball franchise decisions
- Stadium funding challenges
- Tampa Bay sports news
- MLB team management
- Tampa Bay Rays ownership crisis
#Rays #stadium #deal #jeopardy #owner #Stuart #Sternbergs #tenure #appears #headed #crossroads
BGT – Aus vs Ind – SCG axe leaves Mitchell Marsh’s Test career at crossroads
It has been one of the feel-good stories in Australian cricket over the last 18 months, but not quite a year on from being named the Allan Border Medalist, and giving an acceptance speech for the ages, Mitchell Marsh‘s Test career is at a crossroads.“Not necessarily blindsided,” Cummins said of Marsh’s reaction when the news was given to him that he was dropped for the final Test against India at the SCG with Beau Webster handed a debut in his place. With 73 runs in the series and limited impact with the ball, the numbers were not in his favour.Having been informed of the decision before Cummins spoke to reporters, Marsh left the nets having not batted but still signed autographs and posed for pictures with fans who had come in to watch Australia’s opening training session. A very popular team figure, Cummins made a point of mentioning Marsh’s first thoughts on Webster’s inclusion. “The first thing he said was, ‘I can’t wait to see Beau out there and give it a crack’,” Cummins said.
Sydney Tests against India have not been kind to Marsh. In the 2018-19 series he was also dropped for the equivalent fixture having made a one-match return at the MCG where he was booed in what became an often-recalled story of his career. From there he played one Test in four and a half years before his return midway through the 2023 Ashes.In the last few weeks Marsh has looked a shadow of the player who produced a string of match-changing innings since his recall against England. That day at Headingley he was dropped on 12 at slip before racing to a thrilling hundred. Marsh said he played that game as though it was his last, having undergone ankle surgery earlier in the year to give himself a chance of playing Test cricket again. But such was the impact he had he remained for 14 consecutive matches, even forcing Cameron Green to the sidelines early last summer.However, this series he has only once threatened to dominate with the bat, making 47 in the second innings Perth with Australia’s defeat inevitable. At times he has appeared caught between attack and defence.
Marsh’s bowling workload has been a regular talking point – since the Perth Test he has sent down just 16 overs – but while Cummins referenced Webster’s capabilities with the ball, for a match where the workloads of the captain and Mitchell Starc will be of particular focus, it is the lack of runs that has cost Marsh his spot.
“He was in the side this summer for being a top six batter so that’s generally a guiding principle when you are picking a top order,” Cummins said. “Think when he’s at his best he gets into the side on his batting alone and his bowling’s a bonus.”
At 33 it doesn’t have to be the end of Marsh’s Test career, something which Cummins stressed when he confirmed the team, but like Green missing out in England to give him his unexpected return, he will now wait for the cards to fall in his favour. Green will return later in 2025 while Webster has moved ahead of him in the pecking order and, if he can regain bowling fitness, Aaron Hardie will likely soon move up the list.
It’s difficult to see a road for Marsh’s return. Australia are likely to get creative with the balance of their side in Sri Lanka in late January, and playing spin is not one of Marsh’s strengths despite his natural power down the ground. It would be difficult to see him being recalled for a World Test Championship final should Australia qualify having just been left out. Being a key part of Australia’s ODI side means he will also miss Sheffield Shield cricket in February and early March.
It is the second significant selection call Australia have made in the last two Tests following the axing of Nathan McSweeney in favour of Sam Konstas, a move that paid off in dramatic style at the MCG.
In contrast to 19-year-old Konstas, Webster is a player who has done the hard yards through domestic cricket to earn a debut aged 31. In 2023-24 he scored 938 runs and took 30 wickets in the Sheffield Shield, a return only bettered by Garry Sobers. He is also one of the best slip catchers in Australia.He has reinvented himself, too, having revived his medium pace during the 2020 Covid lockdowns to a point where it has now overtaken offspin as his primary weapon with the ball.
“I don’t think I’d be standing here if I was still wheeling out the offspinners,” Webster said in Melbourne last week. “It’s a part of my game I’ve been really proud to develop in the last four years. It’s taken a lot of hard work early doors from being sore at the start and trying to get my body used to bowling a few overs here and there and then bowling lots and lots of Tasmania.
“Now it feels like it’s as important as my batting game and they go hand-in-hand if you’re struggling with the bat you can still contribute with the ball and vice versa.”
Webster will have good memories of his most recent outing at the SCG where he helped Tasmania to victory over New South Wales with a total of 110 runs and five wickets in the match.“He’s a special player at the moment,” Tasmania captain Jordan Silk said after that match in late November. “Any time I feel like we’re in trouble, I feel like I can throw him the ball and he just seems to be able to create something.”
Andrew McGlashan is a deputy editor at ESPNcricinfo
In a shocking turn of events, Mitchell Marsh’s Test career has been left at a crossroads after being axed from the Australian squad for the upcoming Border-Gavaskar Trophy series against India at the Sydney Cricket Ground (SCG).Marsh, who has been a mainstay in the Australian Test side for the past few years, has struggled to make an impact with the bat and ball in recent matches. His poor form in the ongoing Sheffield Shield season has ultimately cost him his place in the team for the highly anticipated series against India.
The decision to drop Marsh from the squad has divided opinions among cricket fans and experts, with many questioning the selectors’ choice to overlook the all-rounder. Some believe that Marsh still has a lot to offer to the team and deserves another chance to prove himself, while others feel that it was the right call to give other players a chance to shine.
With his Test career now hanging in the balance, Marsh will have to work hard to regain his spot in the team and prove his critics wrong. It remains to be seen whether he will be able to bounce back from this setback and make a successful comeback to the Australian Test side.
The upcoming BGT series against India promises to be a thrilling contest, and Marsh’s absence will undoubtedly be felt by the team. It will be interesting to see how the Australian side performs without one of their most experienced players, and whether they can overcome this setback to emerge victorious in the series.
Tags:
BGT, Australia vs India, SCG, Mitchell Marsh, Test career, crossroads, cricket, Australian cricket team, Indian cricket team, Sydney Cricket Ground, international cricket, sports news
#BGT #Aus #Ind #SCG #axe #leaves #Mitchell #Marshs #Test #career #crossroadsCrossroads Between Contrastive Linguistics, Translation Studies and Machine Translation
Price: $44.95
(as of Dec 28,2024 13:35:11 UTC – Details)
Publisher : Saint Philip Street Press (October 9, 2020)
Language : English
Hardcover : 212 pages
ISBN-10 : 1013289854
ISBN-13 : 978-1013289859
Item Weight : 1.72 pounds
Dimensions : 8.5 x 0.5 x 11 inches
In the rapidly evolving field of language studies, the intersection between contrastive linguistics, translation studies, and machine translation presents a fascinating crossroads of research and innovation.Contrastive linguistics, which involves the comparison of different languages to identify similarities and differences, plays a crucial role in translation studies by helping translators navigate the complexities of linguistic structures and cultural nuances. By understanding the contrasts between two languages, translators can effectively convey meaning and maintain the integrity of the original text.
Machine translation, on the other hand, utilizes artificial intelligence and algorithms to automatically translate text from one language to another. While machine translation has made significant advancements in recent years, it still faces challenges in accurately capturing the nuances and subtleties of language that human translators excel at.
At the crossroads of these disciplines, researchers are exploring ways to enhance machine translation through insights from contrastive linguistics and translation studies. By incorporating linguistic theories and principles into machine translation algorithms, researchers aim to improve the accuracy and quality of automated translations.
Additionally, the integration of machine translation technology in the field of translation studies offers new opportunities for collaboration and research. Translators can leverage machine translation tools to streamline their workflow and focus on more complex linguistic tasks, while researchers can analyze the impact of machine translation on translation quality and cross-cultural communication.
Overall, the crossroads between contrastive linguistics, translation studies, and machine translation presents a rich and dynamic area of study that has the potential to reshape the way we approach language translation and communication in an increasingly globalized world.
#Crossroads #Contrastive #Linguistics #Translation #Studies #Machine #TranslationThe Cosmic Crossroads Oracle: A 44-Card Deck and Guidebook for Times of Transition
Price: $21.99
(as of Dec 17,2024 03:28:45 UTC – Details)
Publisher : Hay House LLC (November 19, 2024)
Language : English
Cards : 128 pages
ISBN-10 : 1401973787
ISBN-13 : 978-1401973780
Item Weight : 9.2 ounces
Dimensions : 3.13 x 1.35 x 5.13 inches
Are you at a crossroads in your life? Do you find yourself facing important decisions and seeking guidance on which path to take? Look no further than The Cosmic Crossroads Oracle, a 44-card deck and guidebook designed to help you navigate times of transition with clarity and confidence.This beautifully illustrated oracle deck features cosmic-themed cards that offer insights and wisdom to support you on your journey. Whether you’re facing a career change, a relationship dilemma, or a personal transformation, The Cosmic Crossroads Oracle can provide you with the guidance you need to make empowered choices and move forward with grace.
The accompanying guidebook offers detailed interpretations of each card, as well as suggested spreads and rituals to help you deepen your connection to the messages they hold. With its gentle yet powerful energy, The Cosmic Crossroads Oracle is a valuable tool for anyone seeking guidance and inspiration during times of uncertainty.
Embrace the cosmic wisdom of The Cosmic Crossroads Oracle and let it illuminate your path as you navigate the twists and turns of life’s journey. Trust in the guidance it offers and step confidently into the unknown, knowing that you are supported and guided every step of the way.
#Cosmic #Crossroads #Oracle #44Card #Deck #Guidebook #Times #TransitionPlaid Hat Games Gen7: A Crossroads Game
Price: $18.56
(as of Dec 15,2024 19:24:28 UTC – Details)
GEN7 is a Grand narrative game with multiple possibilities. The choices players make as they play will alter the direction of the story. GEN7 is a Crossroads game in the tradition of the award-winning Dead of winter, and will constantly challenge its players with a variety of unique situations that will force them to make difficult moral decisions. Will you compromise your integrity to ensure the safety of your crew? Will you value Their lives over the safety of the mission?
Solve a mystery and build an exciting narrative with your friends
Deploy your crew to unique ship locations in an attempt to save your mission
Customize your officer by earning valuable merit awards
Resolve moral dilemmas and personal challenges posed by Crossroads cards
Number of players: 3 to 4
Plaid Hat Games has released their newest game, Gen7: A Crossroads Game, and it is a must-have for tabletop gamers. This game takes players on a thrilling journey through space as they navigate the challenges and decisions of being part of a generations-long mission aboard a spaceship.In Gen7, players take on the roles of crew members on a colonial starship, tasked with ensuring the success of their mission and the survival of their fellow colonists. The game is full of tough choices, moral dilemmas, and unexpected twists and turns as players work together to overcome obstacles and achieve their goals.
One of the standout features of Gen7 is its Crossroads system, which presents players with narrative-driven decision points that can have far-reaching consequences. These choices not only shape the course of the game but also help to immerse players in the rich and engaging story of the mission.
With its captivating narrative, strategic gameplay, and immersive storytelling, Gen7: A Crossroads Game is sure to be a hit with fans of Plaid Hat Games and tabletop gaming enthusiasts alike. Don’t miss out on this exciting new release – pick up a copy of Gen7 and set course for adventure in the depths of space.
#Plaid #Hat #Games #Gen7 #Crossroads #Game