Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: CRUEL
EC Cruel Universe (2024) #1 2 3 4 5 Oni Press COVER SELECT
EC Cruel Universe (2024) #1 2 3 4 5 Oni Press COVER SELECT
Price : 19.88
Ends on : N/A
View on eBay
EC Cruel Universe (2024) #1-5 Oni Press Cover SelectGet ready for a thrilling ride through the dark and twisted world of EC Cruel Universe, brought to you by Oni Press. In this five-issue series, you’ll follow a cast of characters as they navigate a universe filled with danger, deception, and betrayal.
With stunning cover art that pops off the page, each issue of EC Cruel Universe is a visual masterpiece that will leave you on the edge of your seat. From the first issue to the last, you’ll be hooked on the gripping storyline and dynamic characters.
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to dive into the world of EC Cruel Universe with Oni Press’ Cover Select series. Grab your copies of issues #1-5 today and prepare yourself for a wild ride through a universe unlike any other.
#Cruel #Universe #Oni #Press #COVER #SELECT,ages 3+The Cruel Abstraction of “Beast Games”
“Beast Games,” a reality-competition show currently streaming on Amazon Prime, opens with a dramatic camera shot, circling in three-sixty degrees to capture the show’s host, a skinny young man holding a mike. The man appears unremarkable: with his sparse beard, fresh-faced complexion, and straight-off-the-Zara-rack outfit (skinny pants, bright white sneakers, blazer over hoodie), he has the look of a junior medical-equipment salesman ready for a night out at a Murray Hill sports bar with his college buddies. The fact that he’s standing on a pyramid-shaped stack of dollars, however, clues us in to the fact that he is no everyman; and when he speaks, his voice, too, crackles with the feverish energy of a megachurch pastor’s. “I am standing on five million dollars of real money,” he shouts. “The largest grand prize in entertainment history! And competing for this five million dollars are these one-thousand contestants. Come on in!”
The man is Jimmy Donaldson, a.k.a. the YouTube sensation MrBeast—the kind of figure who you might not have heard of if you’re over twenty-five, but that the Gen Zs and Gen Alphas in your life are intimately familiar with. (Even if they’re not fans: “Please don’t write about MrBeast,” my thirteen-year-old daughter implored, before knowledgably walking me through some key moments in his career.) Donaldson, who is twenty-six, is currently the most popular creator on YouTube, with three hundred and forty-four million subscribers and hundreds of millions of views for nearly every video he posts. (He recently told Time magazine he brings in between six hundred and seven hundred million dollars in revenue a year.) He began his journey to platform dominance in 2012, when he was just thirteen years old, and, over the years, has become notable for his extravagant, high-production-value videos in which seemingly insurmountable challenges are confronted and bested. Sometimes he serves as the guinea pig to various P.O.W.-style experiences (“I Spent 7 Days Buried Alive”; “I Paid a Real Assassin To Try To Kill Me”; “I Spent 7 Days In Solitary Confinement”); sometimes he extends his hand in charity to a less-fortunate group (“I Helped 2,000 People Walk Again”; “I Saved 100 Dogs From Dying”); and sometimes he offers sizable prizes to contestants whom he pits against each other in a series of gladiatorial rituals (“Every Country On Earth Fights For $250,000”; “100 Boys Vs 100 Girls For $500,000”).
“Beast Games” is aligned with the latter category, and though the show is Donaldson’s first foray into television, it retains much of what has made him a figure of note on YouTube. In the course of ten episodes (only six of which have aired at the time of this writing), Donaldson and his all-male “crew”—five young and excitable sidekicks with names like Nolan and Chandler—preside over a series of challenges, gradually winnowing down the number of contestants from the original thousand the game opens with. The games range from a trivia competition (“Who founded Amazon?” “Jeff Bezos is the correct answer”), to a block-stacking contest (who will be among the first hundred people to be eliminated because of their stack toppling?), to oversized beer pong (which team will get more balls into an enormous Solo cup?). The action takes place, first, in a dark and cavernous hall built out with individual platforms for the competitors, then in a depressingly maquette-like “city” (complete with a “T-Mobile V.I.P. House,” where the winners of one challenge kick back), and later in the brush and sand of a private Panamanian island that members of the gang are competing to win.
The contestants, dressed in blue tracksuits marked by individual serial numbers, are watched over by hooded guards—an Abu Ghraib meets Adidas aesthetic borrowed from the dystopian Korean series “Squid Game,” in which a group of financially hard-up competitors participate in a string of deadly children’s games. But though the Netflix hit is a clear inspiration, “Beast Games” is also a paean to Donaldson’s obsessions, which seem consistently kindled by the infantile instinct to turn make-believe into reality. “What you are witnessing is real,” he intones in voice-over, as the contestants enter the hall where the games begin. “This is bigger than anything you can even imagine.” The point here is over-the-topness: the winner will take home five million dollars, yes, but on offer are also other wins: that Panamanian private island! A Lamborghini! Not to mention additional “large, giant piles of money” besides the main purse. There are also cannons fired from a “real pirate ship,” and “real Navy SEALs” to hunt down contestants in a survival challenge. During the series, the five-million-dollar cash pyramid follows the players to most of the sets the games take place in, standing mutely but pointedly at the center of the action. And, when some of the competitors are eliminated, they drop swiftly and suddenly through trap doors into holes in the floor. All of which is to say, this is not a show that prizes subtext. The spectacle here is one based on literalism: nothing need be imagined ever again.
The glut on display, meanwhile, is coupled with deprivation. “Completely getting my family out of the poverty pipeline,” one contestant explains, when asked why she’s joined the show; another’s father has cancer; a third grew up homeless. The stakes at play are articulated most bluntly by an enthusiastic competitor: “I will die for this. I will die for five million dollars.” This desperation serves as the drama’s motor. Many of the games Donaldson presents are meant to test the competitors’ individual need—or, perhaps, greed—against their commitment to the group. Will a contestant sacrifice himself to insure that the team he’s been placed in won’t get eliminated en masse? Conversely, will a competitor resist offers of money which, if accepted, will make her rich but eliminate her team?
These moments are set up as gripping “Sophie’s Choice”-style decisions. But, as I kept watching, I had to admit to myself that my interest wasn’t stirred, nor was my empathy—mostly because I found it difficult to care about the plight of contestants who, for much of the show’s run, number in the hundreds, and are mostly referred to by their serial digits rather than by their names. There are several nods to the supposed “friendships” contestants have made during the games, and yet, it seems that even Donaldson himself is aware that the show’s participants aren’t strangers just to us but to each other. They “just said no to one million dollars, not for their friends but for people they’ve only known for a couple of days,” he marvels, after four contestants pass, who knows why, on a bribe that would have led to their teammates’ elimination. No matter: what animates the show isn’t character, or motivation, or plot, but numbers. When I looked over the notes I took during my viewing of the series, it occurred to me that they looked less like the critical marginalia I usually jot down and more like a math-class scratch pad. “18 people, $13,000 per person,” one note read; “62 people eliminated, 431 remain,” read another; “player 413 wins golden ticket” read a third.
I’m a lover of reality television, and, yet, I also understand much of the criticism it draws. Reality stars, whether on competition shows like “Survivor” and “The Amazing Race” or on soap-opera-style series like the “Real Housewives” franchise, agree to have their lives used for strangers’ entertainment—a trade-off that, even if consensual, surely isn’t always healthy or even fair. Still, at the very least, they get to be singular characters. The beauty of much reality television—claims of bad edits and manipulative storytelling notwithstanding—is that, as viewers, we’re able to focus on people’s particular experiences and tendencies. (Every day, I thank those generous enough to agree to that trade-off for the American public’s pleasure and edification.) And yet, in “Beast Games,” there are no stars—no subjectivities to observe, no people to get to know, no complicated relationship dynamics to respond to—just a bunch of faceless numbers whooping, screaming, and crying their way through a series of senseless challenges. This kind of abstraction is, in a way, what the show is about, and it is bone chilling. “They literally look like ants,” Donaldson tells one of his cronies as the two stand atop a tower, watching from high up as below them, hundreds of contestants pour into Beast City. Later, he offers another observation: “It’s like a zombie horde coming at me.”
In a world where animals are often exploited for entertainment, the concept of “beast games” is a cruel abstraction that cannot be ignored. These so-called games involve forcing animals to perform unnatural and sometimes dangerous tasks for the amusement of spectators. From circus acts to racing events, the exploitation of animals for human entertainment is a disturbing trend that continues to persist.The use of animals in entertainment has long been a controversial topic, with many arguing that it is inherently cruel to force animals to perform for our amusement. In the case of “beast games,” this cruelty is taken to a whole new level. Animals are often subjected to harsh training methods, confinement, and physical abuse in order to make them perform in ways that are completely unnatural to them.
Furthermore, the very idea of pitting animals against each other in competitive events is morally reprehensible. Whether it’s horse racing, dog fighting, or any other form of animal competition, the exploitation of animals for the sake of entertainment is a deplorable practice that should be abolished.
It is time for society to recognize the inherent cruelty of “beast games” and take a stand against the exploitation of animals for entertainment. We must advocate for the rights of animals and work towards a future where they are treated with the respect and dignity they deserve. Let’s put an end to the cruel abstraction of “beast games” once and for all.
Tags:
- Beast games
- Animal-themed games
- Cruelty in video games
- Virtual animal abuse
- Ethical gaming
- Animal rights in gaming
- Gaming and animal welfare
- The dark side of beast games
- Gaming industry controversies
- Cruelty-free gaming options
#Cruel #Abstraction #Beast #Games
JD Vance defends billionaire business ally accused of cruel small-town America remark
As Republicans try to keep up their populist ruse, big money elites in the party — and their big mouths — are making the herculean task of making Republicans look like authentic defenders of everyday Americans increasingly difficult.
Vivek Ramaswamy and Elon Musk were a prime example of that last week when they faced backlash for appearing to suggest American-born workers are inferior to immigrant workers who come to the United States on H–1B visas. And MAGA-aligned tech billionaire Marc Andreessen faced backlash after a cruel remark he allegedly made about small-town America in 2017 resurfaced on social media this week.
The quote comes from an American Prospect article published in April and authored by journalist Rick Perlstein, who recounted a dinner he had with Andreessen in 2017. In the article, Perlstein recollected an alleged discussion with Andreessen about the plight of small-town Americans. He quotes Andreessen as having said something to the effect of: “I’m glad there’s OxyContin and video games to keep those people quiet.”
Perlstein went on to note that he may have misremembered whether Andreessen used the word “quiet” or another word to indicate small-town America’s futility:
I’m taking the liberty of putting it in quotation marks, though I can’t be sure those were his exact words. Marc, if you’re reading, feel free to get in touch and refresh my memory. Maybe he said “quiescent,” or “docile,” or maybe “powerless.” Something, certainly, along those lines.
The alleged remark suggests Andreessen carried disdain for people who make up much of the MAGA base. On Monday, Andreessen confirmed Perlstein attended dinner at his house in 2017 but appeared to deny having made the degrading comment about small-town Americans. “True to form, he is now slandering me with fake quotes,” Andreessen alleged, referring to Perlstein.
Perlstein isn’t backing down from his reporting. On Tuesday, he encouraged readers to “decide for yourself” and suggested reporters “ask Andreessen to confirm or deny whether he holds the people he grew up with in contempt.”
With regard to contempt, Andreessen’s alleged remark feels similar to Trump‘s reported rhetoric. It’s also reminiscent of the classist depiction of rural America in Vice President-elect JD Vance’s 2016 memoir, “Hillbilly Elegy.”
Vance — whose venture capital firm was reportedly funded in part by Andreessen — leaped to the billionaire investor’s defense on Tuesday.
“I am admittedly biased, but I’m biased because Marc is a good dude,” Vance posted to X. “I don’t believe Pearlstein’s slander for a second.”
The angry quote tweets and replies responding to Vance show he was unsuccessful in totally silencing the backlash, much of which appeared to come from Trump-supporting accounts (including that of conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer).
It looks like some members of the MAGA world are beginning to realize their movement exists to serve wealthy elites at everyone else’s expense. I don’t expect this realization to change their voting behavior writ large. The backlash feels like an isolated moment of resistance rather than a true uprising.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
On Tuesday, JD Vance, the Republican candidate for Senate in Ohio, came to the defense of a billionaire business ally who was accused of making a cruel remark about small-town America. The remark in question was made by Peter Thiel, a tech entrepreneur and venture capitalist, who allegedly said that people in small towns should be left to “rot and die.”Vance, who has positioned himself as a champion of working-class Americans and the rural Midwest, took to Twitter to defend Thiel, calling him a “brilliant thinker and a great American.” Vance went on to say that Thiel’s comments were taken out of context and that he is a strong supporter of rural communities.
The backlash against Thiel’s comments was swift, with many people criticizing him for his callous attitude towards small-town America. Some pointed out that Thiel’s own success was built on the backs of working-class Americans and that his comments were hypocritical.
Despite the controversy, Vance stood by Thiel, showcasing his loyalty to his billionaire business ally. This incident has sparked a debate about the relationship between politicians and wealthy donors, as well as the disconnect between the elite class and everyday Americans.
Tags:
- JD Vance
- Billionaire business ally
- Small-town America
- Controversial remark
- Defense
- Accusations
- Community backlash
- Economic inequality
- Political controversy
- Social media reaction
#Vance #defends #billionaire #business #ally #accused #cruel #smalltown #America #remark
CRUEL DECEPTION: A Bess Crawford Myster… by Todd, Charles Paperback / softback
CRUEL DECEPTION: A Bess Crawford Myster… by Todd, Charles Paperback / softback
Price : 10.18
Ends on : N/A
View on eBay
CRUEL DECEPTION: A Bess Crawford Mystery by Todd, Charles Paperback/softbackFans of historical mysteries will be thrilled to dive into the latest installment of the Bess Crawford series by Charles Todd. In “Cruel Deception,” Bess finds herself embroiled in a dangerous case of betrayal and intrigue as she navigates the treacherous waters of World War I.
Set against the backdrop of war-torn Europe, Bess must unravel a web of lies and deceit that threatens to tear apart the fragile peace. With her sharp wit and keen investigative skills, Bess is determined to uncover the truth, no matter the cost.
Join Bess Crawford on her most harrowing adventure yet in “Cruel Deception” by Charles Todd. This gripping mystery will keep readers on the edge of their seats until the very last page. Get your hands on a copy today and prepare to be swept away by the twists and turns of this compelling tale.
#CRUEL #DECEPTION #Bess #Crawford #Myster.. #Todd #Charles #Paperback #softbackPATH OF EXILE 2 LEVELING GEAR NORMAL / CRUEL ALL CLASS EARLY ACCES POE2
PATH OF EXILE 2 LEVELING GEAR NORMAL / CRUEL ALL CLASS EARLY ACCES POE2
Price : 44.99
Ends on : N/A
View on eBay
Are you ready to conquer the world of Path of Exile 2? Well, we’ve got you covered with the best leveling gear for all classes in the early access stages of the game! Whether you’re playing on normal or cruel difficulty, we’ve got the gear you need to level up quickly and efficiently.From powerful weapons to sturdy armor, our gear recommendations will help you breeze through the early levels of Path of Exile 2. So don’t waste any more time, grab your gear and start your journey to greatness in this epic sequel!
Stay tuned for more tips and tricks to dominate Path of Exile 2! #PathofExile2 #LevelingGear #AllClasses #EarlyAccessPOE2
#PATH #EXILE #LEVELING #GEAR #NORMAL #CRUEL #CLASS #EARLY #ACCES #POE2, Sony