Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: D.C
Trans pilot Jo Ellis shares ‘proof of life’ video amid false claims she flew the helicopter involved in D.C. plane crash
A transgender military pilot posted a “proof of life” video Friday to refute rumors spread on social media that she was flying the helicopter that collided with a commercial jet near Reagan National Airport on Wednesday night, killing 67 people.
“I understand some people have associated me with the crash in D.C., and that is false,” Jo Ellis, a Black Hawk pilot with the Virginia Army National Guard, said in the Facebook video. “It is insulting to the families to try to tie this to some sort of political agenda. They don’t deserve that. I don’t deserve this. And I hope that you all know that I am alive and well, and this should be sufficient for you all to end all the rumors.”
Several hours prior to posting the video, Ellis shared a screenshot on her Facebook account of an X post in which someone had shared two images of her and made the false claim that she was the Black Hawk pilot involved in the deadly crash.
Ellis did not immediately return a request for additional comment.
A Virginia National Guard spokesperson confirmed that Ellis, a chief warrant officer 2, is a currently serving soldier and that there were “no Virginia National Guard personnel on board the Black Hawk that collided with the jetliner Wednesday evening.”
At least two news websites, Santa Monica Observer, based in Santa Monica, California, and The Express Tribune, based in Pakistan, reported on the rumors, with the Observer reporting as fact that Ellis was on board the helicopter and questioning whether the crash “was intentional.” As of Friday afternoon, the Observer had updated its article but the Tribune had not.
Grok, an artificial intelligence chatbot developed by social media platform X, amplified the misinformation. X is owned by Elon Musk, who serves as the company’s chairman and chief technology officer.
“A military helicopter crash involving a transgender pilot named Jo Ellis has sparked significant discussion on X, particularly after the incident where the helicopter collided with an American Airlines flight, resulting in 66 fatalities,” Grok’s summary stated if X users searched Ellis’ name, according to screenshots by multiple X users.
As of Friday afternoon, Grok corrected its summary of Ellis. And if a user asks the AI chatbot who the Black Hawk pilots were that were involved in the deadly crash, it now correctly names two of the three involved.
X did not immediately respond to a request for comment regarding Grok AI’s claims about Ellis.
This week, Ellis wrote an op-ed about her life as a transgender service member and appeared on The Smerconish Podcast, where she said President Donald Trump’s executive order barring trans people from serving and enlisting in the military makes her nervous.
“I don’t really want to have to deal with all of the headlines and everything going on about my service,” she said. “I want to keep my head down, serve, serve honorably and then eventually retire, maybe another 15, 20 years, or however long my my body lets me fly that helicopter.”
She added, “In a time when it’s hard enough to meet recruiting numbers in the military, why would you want to, you know, kick out more soldiers that are willing to sacrifice their life for this country?”
Trans people have increasingly been falsely blamed for tragedies and violence in recent years, particularly after mass shootings. In March 2022, a trans woman living in Georgia said she faced harassment and threats after her photo was shared online alongside false claims that she was the shooter who killed 19 children and two adults at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas. The shooter was killed on the scene by police.
Similar false or unconfirmed claims spread after at least four shootings in the last two years — in Nashville, Tennessee; Philadelphia; Madison, Wisconsin; and Des Moines, Iowa — that the shooters’ were transgender or LGBTQ and that their identities had something to do with the crimes.
These online rumors following violence and tragedies have spiked alongside an increasingly hostile state and federal legislative climate for trans rights. In the last few years, dozens of states have passed laws that restrict transition-related care and school sports participation for trans youth and limit access to restrooms and identity documents for trans people of all ages.
In addition to his executive order barring trans people from the military, Trump has signed executive orders declaring that the United States will only recognize two sexes, male and female, and ending diversity, equity and inclusion programs inside federal agencies. He also signed an order directing agencies to prohibit federal funding for schools promoting “gender ideology and discriminatory equity ideology” and another that aims to restrict access to transition-related care for minors nationwide.
At a news conference Thursday, Trump implied that DEI programs could have caused the deadly crash over the Potomac, though the investigation had only just begun.
Trans pilot Jo Ellis is setting the record straight after false claims surfaced online alleging she was the pilot of the helicopter involved in the recent D.C. plane crash. In a ‘proof of life’ video shared on social media, Ellis can be seen clearly stating that she was not involved in the tragic incident.The video, which has since gone viral, shows Ellis confidently addressing the rumors and affirming her commitment to safe and responsible flying practices. “I want to make it clear that I was not the pilot of the helicopter that crashed in D.C.,” Ellis says in the video. “I take my responsibilities as a pilot very seriously and would never put myself or others in harm’s way.”
Despite the false claims circulating online, Ellis remains determined to continue pursuing her passion for aviation and breaking down barriers in the industry as a transgender pilot. “I will not let these baseless accusations deter me from my goals,” she asserts in the video. “I am proud to be a trans pilot and will continue to fly with integrity and professionalism.”
As the aviation community rallies behind Jo Ellis in support, it is clear that her resilience and determination are unwavering in the face of adversity. Her ‘proof of life’ video serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of verifying information before spreading false claims, especially when it comes to matters of public safety.
Tags:
Trans pilot, Jo Ellis, helicopter crash, D.C. plane crash, proof of life, false claims, transgender pilot, Jo Ellis video, helicopter accident, D.C. aviation incident
#Trans #pilot #Ellis #shares #proof #life #video #false #claims #flew #helicopter #involved #D.C #plane #crashArmy withholds name of Black Hawk helicopter crew in D.C. crash, 2 others identified : NPR
The Army has identified two of the three soldiers killed in Wednesday’s crash outside a busy Washington, D.C. airport. The three-person crew was on board a Black Hawk helicopter that collided with an American Airlines passenger jet carrying 64 people.
The soldiers identified are Staff Sgt. Ryan Austin O’Hara, 28, of Lilburn, Ga. and Chief Warrant Officer Andrew Loyd Eaves, 39, of Great Mills, Md.
The third crew member on the helicopter was a female pilot with 500 hours of flying experience, according to a U.S. official who was not authorized to speak publicly about the investigation. The Army is withholding the pilot’s name at the request of her family.
The withholding of a name in instances like this is a highly unusual move. The identity of the third crew member has already drawn intense scrutiny online.
Misinformation on social media falsely claims she was a transgender pilot from the Virginia National Guard named Jo Ellis. Ellis has posted a “proof of life” video on Facebook, denouncing the rumors and offering condolences to those killed in the crash.
Illinois Democrat Sen. Tammy Duckworth, herself a decorated former Black Hawk pilot, told NPR she understood why the family declined to make their loved-one’s name public.
“ We should be respecting the family’s wishes at a time when they have suffered an unbelievable loss,” Duckworth said. “I think it is a perfectly legitimate request the family would make. And I’m glad that the Army is honoring that request.”
Duckworth condemned the online speculation about the third member of the crew and especially President Trump’s musings that the Army crew was to blame or was affected by diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) hiring.
“Every one of those troops that was in that aircraft earned their place there, and they are the most highly trained military aviators in the world,” Duckworth said. “And I am just sick to my stomach that we would have a president who would say such things about the heroic men and women who serve every single day.”
Despite President Trump saying the pilots of the Army helicopter bore responsibility for the crash, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said the crew was “fairly experienced” and carrying out a “required annual night evaluation, they did have night vision goggles.”
Questions about the helicopter’s path and mission
There remain, however, many unanswered questions about the flight pattern of the Black Hawk helicopter and the exact nature of the training exercise it was on at the time of the crash.
“Initial indications suggest this may have been a checkride, or periodic evaluation by an experienced instructor pilot of a less experienced pilot,” said Brad Bowman, a military analyst with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and a former Black Hawk pilot.
“A checkride, as opposed to a normal training flight, creates some unique dynamics in the cockpit. In a checkride, the less experienced pilot can be nervous and eager to not make mistakes, while the instructor pilot is watching to see how the other pilot responds to different developments,” Bowman explained. “Sometimes an instructor pilot will test the less experienced aviator to see how they respond, but such a technique would have been unusual and inadvisable in that location given the reduced margin for error.”
Defense officials, who were not authorized to speak publicly, told NPR that the instructor pilot, now believed to be Chief Warrant Officer Eaves, had 1,000 hours of flight time, which is considered experienced. The co-pilot, whose name is being withheld, had 500 hours, which is considered normal.
Officials also tell NPR that the Black Hawk was supposed to be flying at a maximum of 200 feet, though sources say it was flying at least 100 feet higher. All requested anonymity given the sensitivity of the investigation.
On Thursday the National Transportation Safety Board says it recovered what are commonly called “black boxes” from the plane — the cockpit voice and flight data recorders. Federal safety investigators believe the Black Hawk helicopter also had its own recording devices, which they hope will help provide more clues on the cause of the crash.
The recent crash of a Black Hawk helicopter in Washington D.C. has left many questions unanswered, including the names of the crew members involved. The Army has chosen to withhold the identities of the individuals involved in the crash, citing privacy reasons.However, two other individuals who were on board the helicopter have been identified. The Army has confirmed that both individuals are safe and in stable condition.
The crash has raised concerns about the safety of military aircraft and the training of helicopter pilots. The investigation into the cause of the crash is ongoing, and the Army is working to determine what went wrong.
As we await more information about the crash and the crew members involved, our thoughts are with all those affected by this tragic incident.
Tags:
army, black hawk helicopter, Washington D.C., crash, military, crew, identification, investigation, National Public Radio, news
#Army #withholds #Black #Hawk #helicopter #crew #D.C #crash #identified #NPRDemocrats Push for D.C. Statehood, a Gambit More About Politics Than Representation
Senator Van Hollen of Maryland is renewing the push for statehood for the Columbia District. He’s co-sponsoring, with 40 of his fellow Democrats, a bill to grant statehood to the district. Yet even if it passes, it faces obstacles in the Constitution. A more open road could be retrocession of residential areas to Maryland.
“Every American should have a full vote in our country’s future,” Mr. Van Hollen writes in a statement announcing his bill and the House version earlier this month, “but we fall short of this promise every day that the residents of the District of Columbia are denied that right in Congress.”
Mr. Van Hollen invoked the Revolutionary War slogan, “No taxation without representation.” In 1820’s Loughborough vs. Blake, though, Chief Justice Marshall ruled that it was the duty of citizens to pay taxes. “Representation,” he wrote of the District, “is not made the foundation of taxation.”
Outside the Beltway, support for D.C. statehood has always been sparse. Only 16 states ratified the District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment of 1978 before it expired. It would have repealed the 23rd Amendment, which gave the District Electoral College votes.
That bill had bipartisan backing in Congress. Maryland and Virginia, which opposed the creation of a powerful new entity next-door, objected. Today, Democrats outnumber Republicans two-to-one in the District, sinking the chances of gaining GOP support.
Nevertheless, District residents pine for representatives in Congress. They’ve voted for president since 1964, following ratification of the 23rd Amendment. They’ve elected mayors and city councils since 1974 but only send a non-voting delegate to Capitol Hill. Congress has final say over laws and budgets.
The District’s unique governance is by design. To avoid giving to any one state outsized influence over the federal government, Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution grants Congress the power to “exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever” in its capital city.
The arrangement, as President Madison writes in 43 Federalist, wasn’t meant to disenfranchise. Instead, he felt proximity to what Washington called “the Federal City” would ensure lawmakers addressed locals’ concerns.
The states “ceding” territory, Madison wrote, would “no doubt provide in the compact for the rights and the consent of the citizens inhabiting it … as they will have had their voice in the election of the government which is to exercise authority over them.”
The Constitution mandates a capital created “by cession of particular states” and in 1790, Congress empowered President Washington to select its location. He claimed territory of Virginia and Maryland, which became the seat of the federal government in 1801.
Article I stated that the capital would be an area “not exceeding ten miles square,” and Washington chose swampland with few residents. Over time, the population grew, boosted before the Civil War when Congress outlawed slavery and Black Americans fled there for freedom.
The District is now home to almost 680,000 residents, more than Vermont and Wyoming. The Admissions Clause of the Constitution forbids the creation of new states from regions of another without its ascent. Maryland’s legislature would likely have to agree to a muddled transfer of ownership.
Glancing at a map of the Columbia District today illuminates a possible solution. The capital city is no longer the complete square Washington sketched because, in 1846, Congress returned Virginia’s portion. This retrocession gave residents the full representation that Mr. Van Hollan’s bill advocates.
But even the constitutionality of that retrocession has been questioned. The Contract Clause forbids states to breach deals, and Virginia agreed to “forever cede and relinquish” territory. Yet it’s a precedent: Returning residential areas and shrinking the District again to areas that conduct federal business.
“Retrocession to Maryland makes a lot of sense,” Congressman Thomas Davis of Virginia said in a 1998 interview with the Washington Post, “except that Maryland doesn’t want” it. He said that the then-attorney general, a Democrat, further held that “an amendment is the only way for Maryland to take it back.”
Despite the uphill climb, Democrats are chasing the dream of gaining two safe Senate seats. That there are no GOP co-sponsors of Mr. Van Hollan’s bill indicates that, in addition to the constitutional obstacles, his bill would serve political goals rather than enfranchise citizens in the District.
Mr. Van Hollen, in his statement, notes that he timed his bill “at the beginning of two years under a Republican-held Congress and presidency.” He recognized “a challenge in the short term” to make it law, indicating that the most likely outcome is feeding a perennial campaign issue.
Another tell that politics is at play is that a common objection on the left — that the Senate is undemocratic because the “Great Compromise” gives large and small states equal representation in the upper chamber — isn’t invoked when it comes to adding the star of tiny D.C. to the flag.
“No Taxation Without Representation,” the motto on District license plates, will prove a powerful political slogan for Democrats, but the Constitution requires a federal district.
In recent news, Democrats have been pushing for Washington, D.C. to become the 51st state in the United States. While this may seem like a move towards fair representation for the residents of the nation’s capital, many critics argue that this push is more about politics than true representation.The debate over D.C. statehood has been ongoing for years, with proponents arguing that the 700,000 residents of the district deserve full voting rights and representation in Congress. Currently, D.C. residents are only represented by a non-voting delegate in the House of Representatives and have no representation in the Senate.
However, opponents of D.C. statehood argue that the push is simply a political move by Democrats to gain two more Senate seats, as D.C. is heavily Democratic-leaning. They argue that the issue is not about fair representation, but rather about gaining a political advantage.
The push for D.C. statehood has also raised concerns about the constitutional implications of making the district a state, as the Constitution specifies that the seat of government should be a separate entity from any state. Critics argue that making D.C. a state would go against the intentions of the Founding Fathers.
While the debate over D.C. statehood is far from over, it is clear that the issue is more about politics than fair representation for the residents of the district. Only time will tell if D.C. will become the 51st state, or if this push will be seen as just another political gambit.
Tags:
- Democrats
- D.C. statehood
- Politics
- Representation
- Democratic Party
- U.S. politics
- Statehood push
- Washington D.C.
- Political strategy
- Congressional debate
#Democrats #Push #D.C #Statehood #Gambit #Politics #Representation
Should Washington, D.C., become the 51st state? WA’s 2 senators say it’s ‘long past time’
Washington became the 42nd state in 1889. Now, both of its U.S. senators want to see the other Washington — D.C., that is — get granted statehood, too.
Sen. Maria Cantwell earlier this month voiced her support for the idea on social media.
“I have cosponsored S. 51, legislation to recognize the District of Columbia as a state,” she posted on X (formerly Twitter) on Jan. 15. “DC’s more than 700,000 residents should have full representation in our democracy.”
Cantwell’s congressional counterpart, Sen. Patty Murray, told McClatchy in an emailed statement that she feels the same. D.C. residents have lived without full representation in Congress for too long, she said, and have “therefore [been] denied the right to fully participate in our democracy.”
“It’s long past time for that to change,” Murray said. “I am proud to stand with my colleagues to cosponsor the Washington, D.C. Admission Act, which would grant DC statehood and finally give the nearly 700,000 residents of our nation’s capital a real voice in Congress — an effort I have supported for years.”
Why do people want D.C. to become a state?
The idea to create a new state from Washington, D.C., has been around for some time, with iterations of the D.C.-statehood debate circulating since the early 1800s.
Of note: The last time that the United States let another jurisdiction join was in 1959, when Alaska and Hawaii hopped on board.
D.C. statehood-related referendums, campaigns and bills in the Senate and House have cropped up since the 1980s, but nothing has made it through both congressional chambers.
The House of Representatives in June 2020 gave the greenlight to statehood with H.R. 51, but the first administration of President Donald Trump and the Senate opposed it. The following spring, the House again passed the measure, sponsored by Democrat Eleanor Holmes Norton, D.C.’s nonvoting delegate.
Former President Joe Biden’s administration had indicated support for the bill, but the Senate remained an insurmountable hurdle. (About 92% of the district’s voters backed Biden in the 2020 presidential election.)
Advocates argue that D.C. residents are treated like second-class citizens; they serve on juries and in the military, pay federal taxes and contribute to the U.S. economy. At the same time, they’re not able to control their own budget or laws, and have no votes in Congress, according to statehood.dc.gov.
The 51st-state idea is embraced by those who live within the district. More than 85% of D.C. residents reportedly voted for statehood during a 2016 nonbinding referendum.
But detractors contend that the District of Columbia was never meant to be a state. They view the push as an “unconstitutional power grab”: a liberal-led partisan effort to pass more left-leaning legislation.
Social media users haven’t been shy about responding to Cantwell’s posts about the controversial topic.
“No. The District of Columbia was intended to be the seat of the federal government, not a state,” one X commenter wrote Jan. 15. Some argued that the lawmaker’s focus should stay fixed on the West Coast Washington, not the other one out east.
Still, others have applauded Cantwell’s stance, including on a pro-D.C. statehood Facebook post from 2020.
One person noted that D.C. has a larger population than states such as Vermont and Wyoming. Another replied to the senator: “Thank you, this is long past due!! [American flag emoji].”
As the debate over whether Washington, D.C., should become the 51st state continues to heat up, two of Washington state’s senators have weighed in on the issue. Senators Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell have both expressed their support for D.C. statehood, arguing that it is “long past time” for the nation’s capital to have full representation in Congress.Currently, Washington, D.C., is a federal district and is not considered a state, meaning that its residents do not have voting representation in Congress. This has long been a point of contention for many D.C. residents, who argue that they should have the same rights as citizens in other states.
Proponents of D.C. statehood argue that the district’s population is larger than that of several states, and that its residents pay federal taxes just like everyone else. They also point out that D.C. residents have served in the military and have fought in wars to defend the country, yet they do not have a voice in Congress.
Opponents of D.C. statehood argue that the district was created as a neutral ground for the federal government and should not become a state. They also argue that D.C. residents already have representation through a delegate in the House of Representatives.
As the debate over D.C. statehood continues, it is clear that there are strong opinions on both sides of the issue. Whether or not Washington, D.C., becomes the 51st state remains to be seen, but it is clear that the conversation is far from over.
Tags:
Washington D.C., statehood, 51st state, U.S. senators, Washington D.C. statehood debate, political news, voting rights, congressional representation, Washington D.C. statehood bill
#Washington #D.C #51st #state #senators #long #timeGov. Green to travel to Washington, D.C. : Maui Now
January 27, 2025, 2:00 PM HST
Gov. Josh Green, M.D., will travel to Washington, D.C., this week to provide input regarding the nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for Secretary of Health and Human Services.
Green has expressed concerns about the potential impact of Kennedy’s confirmation on Hawai‘i and the nation.
“Our people deserve a Health and Human Services Secretary who champions science, supports vaccines, and is committed to lowering costs while safeguarding health care access,” said Green, who expressed concerns about the future of critical programs like Medicare and Medicaid.
In 2019 as Hawai‘i’s Lieutenant Governor, Dr. Green played a pivotal role in addressing a severe measles epidemic in Samoa. His hands-on efforts, including vaccinating tens of thousands of individuals, demonstrated the lifesaving importance of science-based public health initiatives.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ADARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ADThe Governor will depart Hawai‘i on Monday evening, Jan. 27, 2025, and return on Thursday afternoon, Jan. 30, 2025. During his absence, Lt. Gov. Sylvia Luke will serve as Acting Governor.
Exciting News: Gov. Green to travel to Washington, D.C. for important meetings!We are thrilled to announce that Governor Green will be traveling to the nation’s capital to meet with federal officials and discuss important issues facing our state. This trip comes at a crucial time as Hawaii continues to navigate the challenges brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Stay tuned for updates on Gov. Green’s trip and the outcomes of his meetings in Washington, D.C. Mahalo for your continued support! #MauiNow #GovGreen #WashingtonDC #HawaiiStrong
Tags:
Gov. Green, Washington D.C., travel, Maui Now, Hawaii, government, politics, official trip, governor, news, updates, travel plans.
#Gov #Green #travel #Washington #D.C #MauiRural Kansans depend on Medicaid at beginning and end of life. D.C. proposals threaten program. • Kansas Reflector
In the public debate over Medicaid expansion in Kansas, a critical fact often gets lost: Large numbers of residents already depend on the program.
What’s more, despite racist stereotypes, those benefiting from the program live mostly in rural areas.
A new report from Georgetown University’s Center for Children and Families sketches the present system and makes clear the threat of potential Medicaid cuts from Congress. A menu of potential spending reductions from U.S. House Budget Committee chair Rep. Jodey Arrington slashes $2.3 trillion — yes, that’s with a “t” — from the program covering low-income Americans, Politico reported.
“Medicaid is really the backbone of so many aspects of our health care system, from birth to long-term care, and many stops in between,” said Joan Alker, executive director and cofounder of the center. According to surveys, “this is literally the last thing voters want — voters of all political parties.”
As lawmakers in Washington, D.C., prepare a massive tax cut and spending bill, it seemed worthwhile to learn about what Medicaid means to rural areas. It also seemed worthwhile to learn about what it means for Kansas. Again: The program already covers Kansans of all ages. Alker and Benjamin Anderson, the president and chief executive officer of Hutchinson Regional Healthcare System, joined me on the Kansas Reflector podcast to sort through the issues.
Anderson told me the program is absolutely vital.
“A disproportionate share of seniors, of moms and and children in our area receive health care through Medicaid, and some of them represent the working poor,” he said. “We are a state that has not expanded Medicaid, but children in in Kansas, it is a significant source of access for them. And so, when parents have a sick kid who can’t access health care, those parents can’t work, and when they can’t work, then we see economic impacts for that as well. It’s an essential partner, specifically around maternal child health, and then also with caring for seniors.’ ”
The report, based on information from the Census Bureau’s 2023 American Community Survey, stresses several key findings to bolster that perspective:
- Of kids in small towns and rural communities, almost 41% receive coverage through Medicaid. In metro areas, 38% do.
- Of adults under age 65 in small towns and rural communities, about 18% receive coverage through Medicaid. In metro areas, the figure is 16%.
- In areas with large numbers of tribal residents (American Indian or Alaska Native), those of all ages are likelier to be covered by the program.
In Kansas, 32.3% of kids in rural areas are covered by Medicaid or CHIP, compared to 28.7% of metro-area kids. Also, 11.9% of seniors in rural areas are covered by Medicaid, while 11.3% of seniors in metro areas are covered.
“From birth to seniors, Medicaid is a vital source of health insurance to our residents, covering more Kansans in rural communities,” said April Holman, executive director of the Alliance for a Healthy Kansas, on the report. “Additionally, this report makes clear that Medicaid is an important stable revenue source for hospitals and providers in rural Kansas, ensuring that we can access health care when and where we need it.”
Anderson spoke about his experience at Kearny County Hospital in Lakin. More than half of the births at the hospital were covered by Medicaid. Without that safety net, mothers wouldn’t have had access to prenatal care. Without prenatal care? Untold numbers of mothers and babies would suffer.
The effects on the elderly are similarly far reaching.
“They essentially deplete their resources before the end of their life,” Anderson said. “And these are people that diligently save, but people are living longer than they have, and just circumstances come up where that’s happened. And Medicaid is the backstop for skilled nursing. When we start compromising that infrastructure, and they can’t get into skilled nursing, they end up in our emergency department. There is well-documented evidence that among those vulnerable populations, over 50% of the health care spent in that person’s life is in their last six months. If we think we’re going to save by cutting this, we have a rude awakening coming.”
Taking a broader view, that means that Medicaid cuts have a negative multiplier effect, Alker said. If the federal government carves trillions out of the program, states will be forced to fill the gap. No one wants to see old people or children dying in the streets. But that means other services will suffer.
“This is going to impact education. It’s going to impact transportation, roads, law enforcement, everything in the state’s budget, because states will be left holding the bag,” she told me. “And it’s an absolutely untenable situation. They simply can’t manage their way out of this.”
Anderson characterized himself as a right-of-center conservative concerned about the deficit. But given his knowledge of the health care sector, he said, these types of cuts simply won’t have their intended effect.
“We’re only going to send people into the (emergency department) and spend more federal money in Medicare to offset it,” he said.
“There are ways to incentivize work,” he added. “There are ways to incentivize healthy families. This ain’t it, to use a west Kansas phrase.”
My discussion with Alker and Anderson proves a point that I’ve made repeatedly. Officials in Kansas and Washington, D.C., have to find ways to separate partisanship from policy. While Medicaid might not be perfect — we chatted about various reforms that could strengthen the program — it serves an invaluable role in the same rural communities that voted for the new president.
We all have a duty to care for those in need during their darkest hours. That duty transcends creed or party. It goes to the very core of what makes us human.
Clay Wirestone is Kansas Reflector opinion editor. Through its opinion section, Kansas Reflector works to amplify the voices of people who are affected by public policies or excluded from public debate. Find information, including how to submit your own commentary, here.
Rural Kansans depend on Medicaid at beginning and end of life. D.C. proposals threaten program. • Kansas ReflectorThe Medicaid program plays a crucial role in providing healthcare coverage for rural Kansans, particularly during the most vulnerable times in their lives. From prenatal care to end-of-life services, Medicaid ensures that individuals in rural communities have access to the necessary medical support they need.
However, recent proposals in Washington D.C. threaten to dismantle the Medicaid program, putting the health and well-being of rural Kansans at risk. As policymakers debate the future of Medicaid, it is essential to consider the impact on those who rely on this program for essential healthcare services.
Rural Kansans deserve access to quality healthcare, regardless of their income or zip code. Medicaid is a lifeline for many in these communities, and any cuts or changes to the program could have devastating consequences. It is imperative that we advocate for the protection and expansion of Medicaid to ensure that all Kansans, especially those in rural areas, have access to the care they need to live healthy and fulfilling lives.
Tags:
SEO Friendly Tags:
– Rural Kansans
– Medicaid
– D.C. proposals
– healthcare
– healthcare access
– Kansas Reflector
– rural healthcare
– Medicaid program
– healthcare policy
– healthcare legislation
#Rural #Kansans #depend #Medicaid #beginning #life #D.C #proposals #threaten #program #Kansas #ReflectorWealthy Trump appointees are flocking to Washington, D.C., and looking for luxury homes
-
Howard Lutnick, whom Trump tapped for Commerce secretary, purchased a $25 million home; and Scott Bessent, whom Trump chose for Treasury secretary, is on the hunt, according to the Wall Street Journal.
President Donald Trump compiled his ideal cabinet: an ultrawealthy one. If all his nominees are confirmed, their combined wealth could be more than $20 billion on paper, New York magazine estimated earlier. Oh, and that excludes the richest man in the world, who appears to have the president’s ear: Elon Musk.
It seems some of them want to be—or need to be—near their chief who has left his Florida base of Mar-a-Lago and returned to the White House, so they’re snatching up multimillion-dollar homes in Washington, D.C., fit for the elite, according to the Wall Street Journal.
Cantor Fitzgerald chief executive Howard Lutnick, whom Trump tapped for Commerce secretary, purchased a 16,250-square-foot home in Foxfall from a Fox News anchor for $25 million in December. It set a record for the D.C. area, the Journal reported.
Then there’s his pick for Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent. The hedge fund manager is looking for a lavish home, people familiar told the Journal. Plus, investor John Phelan, Trump’s choice for Navy secretary, is on the hunt.
Elected officials with some money to spend are putting down roots as well. Republican Senator David McCormick, a former Bridgewater executive, bought a house in Georgetown for $10.5 million, the Journal reported, citing people familiar.
Representatives for Lutnick, Bessent, Phelan, and McCormick did not immediately respond to Fortune’s request for comment.
Local real estate agents are apparently calling it the “Trump bump.”
In November and December, there were 20 sales above $5 million in the D.C. metropolitan area, according to the Journal, which cited data from Bright MLS. That is up from 10 in the same months the year before and one in 2016. Not to mention, so far this month there have been seven sales above that $5 million mark.
To be clear, home prices across the country have soared in recent years. Zillow put the average home value in D.C. at about $604,000—but these aren’t your average Americans.
Axios previously estimated Lutnick’s personal net worth at $2 billion. Bessent recently disclosed assets worth at least $521 million, including an estate in the Bahamas worth anywhere between $5 million and $25 million (which provides a rental income of $50,001 to $100,000), and a home in North Carolina worth somewhere between $5 million and $25 million.
Brokers told the Journal that deals on pricy homes are happening much faster than in prior administrations, including Trump’s first term. But it isn’t only nominees on the hunt: Executives are looking for real estate in D.C. to be near Trump and his people.
“There are a lot of folks who are coming to Washington that aren’t necessarily even politicians, but those that want to be close to the sun,” Sotheby’s Daniel Heider, who handled Lutnick’s deal, told the Journal. “They make 2016 look like amuse-bouche for the main entree, which is this moment in time right now.”
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
It seems that wealthy Trump appointees are flocking to Washington, D.C., in search of luxury homes. With the new administration taking over, there has been a surge in demand for high-end properties in the nation’s capital.These well-heeled individuals are looking to settle down in style, with many of them eyeing exclusive neighborhoods like Georgetown, Kalorama, and Dupont Circle. They are willing to pay top dollar for spacious mansions, penthouse apartments, and historic townhouses that offer privacy, security, and all the amenities they desire.
Real estate agents in the area have reported a significant increase in inquiries from Trump appointees and their families. They are seeking homes with features like private elevators, gourmet kitchens, home theaters, and outdoor living spaces. Many of them are also interested in properties with proximity to top schools, upscale shopping, and fine dining establishments.
As the influx of wealthy Trump appointees continues, competition for luxury homes in Washington, D.C., is expected to heat up. It looks like the nation’s capital is about to become even more exclusive and glamorous as these high-profile individuals make their mark on the city’s real estate market.
Tags:
- Wealthy Trump appointees
- Washington D.C. luxury homes
- Trump administration officials
- Upscale real estate in Washington D.C.
- Luxury housing for political elite
- High-end properties in D.C.
- Wealthy government officials
- Exclusive homes for Trump appointees
- Luxury living in the nation’s capital
- Washington D.C. real estate trends
#Wealthy #Trump #appointees #flocking #Washington #D.C #luxury #homes
-
Nearly all of D.C. shut down for Trump’s inauguration. So why was there no designated survivor?
President Donald Trump’s swearing-in ceremony Monday featured the largest, most complex security footprint of any inauguration in U.S. history.
The nation’s capital was transformed seemingly overnight from a pedestrian-friendly city into a daunting and impenetrable fortress – the result of a multi-agency task force that erected 30 miles of anti-scale fencing, coordinated aerial surveillance and drones, and saw the deployment of tens of thousands of law enforcement, military personnel, undercover agents, and national guard trucks across D.C.
The impressive, whole-of-government security effort on Inauguration Day was unprecedented, and not without reason: Trump was the victim of two assassination attempts during the 2024 campaign — including a shooter who came so close to him as to nick his ear — and a domestic threat landscape that was heightened further by the terrorist-inspired attack in New Orleans and the execution-style killing of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson in Midtown Manhattan late last year.
It’s notable, then, that this year’s sprawling security footprint did not expressly include one key component considered fundamental to U.S. tradition: The naming of a designated survivor.
In D.C., the tightly coordinated federal protection efforts were carefully planned long ahead of Trump’s inauguration ceremony by the Secret Service and many other federal agencies.
It’s both a nod to recent security concerns, and more largely an effort to protect the U.S. body politic, foreign dignitaries, donors, and thousands of attendees from any mass catastrophe or threat.
The designated survivor, who in a catastrophic event would bear the responsibility of leading the U.S. in the aftermath of a crisis, is typically a Cabinet officer when major security events put elected officials all in one spot, such as inaugurations and State of the Union addresses.
WORLD LEADERS REACT AS TRUMP RE-ENTERS WHITE HOUSE
Previous designated survivors have included former DHS secretary Jeh Johnson, former Energy Secretary Rick Perry, and former Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who was tapped for the role during President Barack Obama’s inauguration in 2009.
Gates, a George W. Bush appointee, was kept on by Obama and served in his Pentagon role until July 2011, according to his official Defense Department biography.
The survivor’s location, and sometimes identity, remains confidential until after the event disperses and its attendees have safely returned home. In high-profile events, a broader contingency plan is in place.
As Garrett Graff reported in 2016, Gates’s role as designated survivor during Obama’s inauguration also included the support of another government heavyweight — James Clapper, then the undersecretary of intelligence — who stowed away during the ceremony deep in an underground government bunker in Pennsylvania, a backup to the backup, if you will, and a nod at the detailed succession plan carefully crafted by a group defense, intelligence, and other federal agencies over the span of some 40-plus years.
So it was notable that no designated survivor was named during the 47th presidential inauguration.
TRUMP INAUGURATION GUEST LIST INCLUDES TECH TITANS MARK ZUCKERBERG, JEFF BEZOS, ELON MUSK
No reason was given for the absence of the designated survivor, which was first reported by NBC News.
It’s possible that the sprawling security presence coordinated in the run-up to Jan. 20 was deemed sufficient to protect against any threats.
DEMS PROMISE TO ‘STAND UP TO’ TRUMP BUT LAUD ‘PEACEFUL TRANSFER OF POWER’ AFTER SPEECH
It’s also possible the event, which was held indoors and thus restricted to the public and to members of the news media, was limited enough as not to warrant the designated survivor.
Ahead of the event, FBI and Secret Service personnel stressed the stringent security measures in place and the tight vetting of any ticketed attendees.
David Sundberg of the FBI’s Washington Field Office told Fox News earlier this week that the bureau was not tracking “any specific or credible threats” for Inauguration Day.
“All attendees will undergo screening,” said Matt McCool, special agent in charge of the Secret Service’s Washington Field Office.
These individuals told Fox News that the fencing alone is more than any other designated National Special Security Event in the past.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“Designated checkpoints will be set up for members of the public interested in attending the inauguration,” McCool said ahead of the inauguration — a protocol also applied to attendees of the modified Capital One festivities, which were moved inside due to frigid temperatures.
Neither the White House, DHS nor the FBI immediately responded to Fox News Digital’s request for comment on the absence of a designated survivor.
Fox News Digital’s Elizabeth Elkind contributed to this report.
As the nation’s capital came to a standstill for Donald Trump’s inauguration, one crucial detail was missing – a designated survivor. In the event of a catastrophic attack that wipes out the entire line of presidential succession, the designated survivor is a high-ranking official who is kept in a secure location during major events like inaugurations to ensure the continuity of government.With nearly all of Washington, D.C. shut down for Trump’s inauguration, the absence of a designated survivor raised eyebrows and concerns about the potential vulnerability of the government. In past inaugurations, a designated survivor was always in place as a precautionary measure, but this time, it seems that the tradition was overlooked.
The lack of a designated survivor highlights the importance of careful planning and preparation for worst-case scenarios, especially in a time of heightened security threats. As the new administration takes office, it is crucial that steps are taken to ensure the safety and stability of our government in the face of potential threats. Let’s hope that this oversight does not come back to haunt us in the future.
Tags:
- Trump inauguration shutdown
- D.C. shutdown for inauguration
- Designated survivor absence
- Political event shutdown
- Presidential inauguration closure
- D.C. security measures
- Inauguration shutdown details
- Designated survivor protocol
- Presidential event security
- Why no designated survivor for Trump inauguration
#D.C #shut #Trumps #inauguration #designated #survivor
D.C. Cab
Price: $4.29
(as of Jan 21,2025 04:53:52 UTC – Details)
Washington, D.C., becomes the District of Comedy in this high-speed hit from writer-director Joel Schumacher (Veronica Guerin, Phone Booth, Bad Company).When young Albert Hockenberry (Adam Baldwin) wants to become a cabbie, he’s got the wackiest teachers around, courtesy of his Uncle Howard (Max Gail) and the freewheeling D.C. Cab Co., including Samson (Mr. T) and Dell (Gary Busey). Along the way, Albert falls in love with beautiful waitress, Claudette (Jill Schoelen), and gets caught up in a kidnapping, with Mr. T and the other cabbies riding to the rescue to the tune of Mission: Impossible.
From a raid on a topless club and a game of chicken with an oncoming train to a cameo appearance by singer Irene Cara, their hilarious hi-jinks spell comedy with a “capital” C!
Aspect Ratio : 1.85:1
Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
MPAA rating : R (Restricted)
Product Dimensions : 7.75 x 5.75 x 0.53 inches; 2.4 ounces
Item model number : 2220298
Director : Joel Schumacher
Media Format : Multiple Formats, Color, Widescreen, NTSC, Dolby
Run time : 1 hour and 40 minutes
Release date : September 1, 2015
Actors : Mr. T, Adam Baldwin, Charlie Barnett, Gary Busey, Irene Cara
Producers : Topper Carew
Language : Unqualified, English (Dolby Digital 2.0)
Studio : Universal Pictures Home Entertainment
ASIN : B0006IIPJO
Number of discs : 1
D.C. Cab: A Classic 80s ComedyIf you’re in the mood for a hilarious and nostalgic comedy, look no further than D.C. Cab. This 1983 film follows the misadventures of a group of quirky cab drivers in Washington D.C. as they navigate their way through the ups and downs of their chaotic lives.
Starring Mr. T, Adam Baldwin, and Gary Busey, D.C. Cab is packed with laughs, memorable characters, and plenty of heart. From wild cab rides to crazy schemes, this movie is sure to keep you entertained from start to finish.
So grab some popcorn, sit back, and enjoy the ride with D.C. Cab. It’s a true classic that will have you laughing out loud and reminiscing about the good old days of 80s cinema.
#D.C #Cab,bomge u204 driverProud Boys and other Jan 6 rioters return to D.C. to celebrate President Trump
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.
Virjilio Burciaga came all the way from California to celebrate Donald Trump’s inauguration in front of the Capitol — the first time the 48-year-old electrician had returned to the house of American democracy since he protested with a mob that stormed the building on January 6, 2021.
“At one point they were seeing us as insurrectionists,” he told The Independent, “now it’s changed to we’re all going to get pardoned, you know, that label has been lifted.”
And hours later, the newly reinstated President Trump did just that, promising that he would take action for the people he dubs the “J6 hostages,” meaning those currently accused or detained for offenses during the Capitol riot. Trump has promised to issue sweeping pardons for many of the 1,500 protesters jailed for the attack.
That is welcome news for Virjilio and his wife, Clara, who were both in attendance that day.
“I’m like, when are they gonna known down my door and take me out of my house right and throw me in jail,” Clara says, with the Capitol building behind her.
The couple believe there should be a distinction made between violent protesters and those who trespassed in the Capitol (although Virjilio insists he didn’t enter the building).
“These guys are political prisoners,” she continues. “All these real criminals are being pardoned by this [Biden] administration and what happened to our J6ers?”
The Californian couple also believe that those who faced charges should receive compensation.
“I don’t believe in lawsuits, but they need to get reimbursed for their time,” Virjilio says.
President Trump’s unlikely political comeback has brought with it a reimagining of the attack on the Capitol‚ starting with a weak condemnation of the violence on the day, and then later referred to it as a “day of love.”
After being criticised by most in his own party for his role in directing the riot, which was aimed at stopping certification of Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 presidential election election, most Republicans have now joined Trump in playing down its significance.
And it was clear that this year’s inauguration day was a celebration for Jan 6 rioters thrilled about Trump’s return, a case of history being written by the winner.
Across town, near to the Capitol One Arena, a group of Proud Boys — the group most responsible for the January 6 insurrection — gathered in much diminished numbers to their last Capitol appearance.
The groups leader, Henry “Enrique” Tarrio, 39, of Miami, Florida, received one of the harshest sentences of everyone invoked in the attack, sentenced to 22 years in prison and 36 months of supervised release.
“No organization put more boots on the ground at the Capitol on January 6, 2021 than the Proud Boys, and they were at the forefront of every major breach of the Capitol’s defenses, leading the on-the-ground efforts to storm the seat of government,” said U.S. Attorney Matthew M. Graves for the District of Columbia, in September 2023, when Tarrio was sentenced.
Several members refused to be interviewed Monday by The Independent, but one masked member who identified himself as Harry Fox, says “the Proud Boys did nothing wrong.”
Fox says the attack on the Capitol was “the driving force” behind him joining the group, and that the attack was sparked by police attacking protesters.“
“How much is a crowd supposed to put up with — when you’ve stolen an election, you’ve ripped our constitution up for a year and then you steal an election and people show up, then you shoot into a crowd?” he asks.
“At what point are people supposed to just keep taking it — when you see Grandma getting hit in the head with a baton, when you see people praying, being sprayed in the face with mace, or when you see people standing there exercising their First Amendment right to assemble?”
The Independent, which was present at the January 6 riot, previously reported that the Proud Boys led an attack on police in an attempt to gain access to the Capitol and stop the certification of Biden’s win.
The Proud Boys and other Jan 6 rioters have returned to Washington D.C. to celebrate former President Donald Trump. Despite facing backlash and legal consequences for their involvement in the Capitol insurrection, these far-right extremists have gathered once again in the nation’s capital.The Proud Boys, a known white supremacist group, were one of the main instigators of the violence on Jan 6. Their return to D.C. signals a continued defiance of democratic norms and a dangerous embrace of Trump’s false claims of election fraud.
It is deeply concerning to see these individuals openly celebrating a man who incited an attack on the very heart of American democracy. Their presence in D.C. serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing threat posed by extremist groups and the urgent need for accountability and justice.
As we continue to reckon with the aftermath of the Jan 6 insurrection, it is crucial that we remain vigilant against the resurgence of violent extremism and stand firm in defense of our democratic institutions. The Proud Boys and their ilk may seek to sow chaos and division, but we must not waver in our commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting our democracy.
Tags:
Proud Boys, Jan 6 rioters, D.C. celebration, President Trump supporters, far-right groups, political protests, Capitol riots, MAGA rally, Trump supporters gather, right-wing extremists, political unrest, Washington D.C. events
#Proud #Boys #Jan #rioters #return #D.C #celebrate #President #Trump