A lot of money
16 dead 16 missing | Jan. 13
A recent article regarding the Los Angeles fires estimated the current cost of the damage at as high as $150 billion. Now, let’s put this unimaginable destruction into perspective.
Elon Musk can personally afford to rebuild every bit of destruction in California combined with every bit of hurricane destruction along Florida’s Gulf Beaches and still be one of the world’s richest men. He could then pay for it all a second time, if needed.
Every one of us peasants should think seriously about that. Hundreds of billions in damage and one man could afford to fix it — twice.
Glen Getchell, Seminole
A day of infamy
Many Americans don’t think they’ll see a woman elected president | Jan. 12
I’m inclined to agree with this headline, and Gilda Cobb-Hunter’s statement that “American men hate and fear women, and even some women hate other women.” She goes on to say that “America is as racist and misogynist as it has always been.” I could not agree with her more, and I’m an elderly white man living here in Florida for the past 40-plus years.
Both Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris were well-qualified candidates with intelligence, experience and a reputation for honesty and integrity. Instead, we embrace a conman that claims that only he can fix America’s problems. We elect a well-documented liar, cheat and convicted criminal.
Does anyone remember that he lied 34,573 time in his first term? Does anyone remember how many people died from COVID because of his botched response? Does anyone remember that the national debt went up more than $7 trillion on his watch? And we want more of his dishonesty and incompetence. Are we insane?
I am reminded of the last words Jesus spoke as he was about to die on the cross; “Forgive them for they know not what they have done.” Jan. 20, 2025, will be a day that will live in infamy. It will become known as the day American democracy died and our way of life along with it.
Chuck Wolowitz, Clearwater
How about Haley?
Woman for president | Letters, Jan. 15
The letter writer asked, why must the first female president ride to Washington on a donkey? Well, Republicans had the perfect candidate in Nikki Haley. She had the perfect resume — governor, U.N. Ambassador, as conservative if not more so, than Trump. She would have done all the things he is doing, only with more calculation and less ridiculous drama. So I’ll ask: Did the letter writer support this near perfect female GOP candidate?
Martin Fouts, St. Petersburg
Making America great
Trump endorses DeSantis’ call for special session on immigration | Jan. 15
I voted for the new administration for several reasons. Donald Trump promised to once again make us energy independent, to make our southern border secure, to make our country safer and to keep men out of women’s sports and out of their bathrooms and locker rooms. I expect that he will take a stronger stand against terrorism and those who wish to destroy Israel, and I believe he will deal more firmly with adversaries like Russia, China, North Korea and Iran.
Spend your days with Hayes
Subscribe to our free Stephinitely newsletter
Columnist Stephanie Hayes will share thoughts, feelings and funny business with you every Monday.
You’re all signed up!
Want more of our free, weekly newsletters in your inbox? Let’s get started.
I believe that Trump will push back on the censorship and biased coverage that we have seen from both social and news media the past four years. He will eliminate the hateful, divisive and dangerous political rhetoric that we saw from an administration that called their political opponents “Hitler” and threats to democracy, which clearly resulted in two attempts to assassinate their political rival.
I expect to see less “wokeness” and fewer diversity, inclusion and equity appointments, less anti-white, anti-male, and anti-America identity politics that the left brought to the American political landscape. I am sure we will not see the justice system used to attack political rivals or see attacks on the courts for decisions that the administration does not agree with. In other words, I expect to see my country the way it was meant to be and not the way some zealous ideologues with dystopian dreams would like it to be.
Charles Michael Sitero, Ormond Beach
Families vs. investors
5 takeaways from Buying up the Bay | Dec. 24
In concluding the Tampa Bay Times series “Buying Up the Bay,” the reporters reiterated the negative effects corporate investors in the local housing market have on Tampa Bay families and their communities. The series highlights the dilemma that while so many families struggle to buy or rent affordable housing, well-funded investors buy up whatever meager housing supply is available.
As income and wealth inequality have soared over the past decades, the middle class has been shrinking and now includes less than half of the population.
Investors are crowding out middle-class people from the opportunity to accumulate equity through home ownership. In past decades, home equity has been the main vehicle by which the middle class builds intergenerational wealth.
Instead of policies to alleviate the worst impacts of investors buying up the available supply of single-family houses, the governor and Legislature have made it worse by passing legislation nullifying county and city-level authority to protect home buyers and renters.
The only authority left to protect neighborhoods is homeowner’s associations, which can place limits on corporate investments. Neighborhoods without HOAs must organize to educate and encourage their neighbors not to sell to these investors.
Until Floridians vote out the politicians who favor corporations over the interests of most of their citizens, the middle class will continue to struggle to hold onto diminishing territory as corporate predators continue to roam wild.
Robert White, Valrico
Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, is known for his ambitious projects and revolutionary ideas. With a net worth of over $200 billion, he is currently the world’s richest man. However, as the devastating wildfires in California continue to wreak havoc on homes and infrastructure, many are wondering if Musk could single-handedly cover the costs of the damage and still remain at the top of the wealth rankings.
The estimated cost of the damage caused by the wildfires in Los Angeles is currently in the billions of dollars. While Musk’s wealth is certainly substantial, it may not be enough to cover the entire cost of the damage. However, Musk has shown a willingness to use his resources for philanthropic causes in the past, such as donating millions to various charities and organizations.
If Musk were to donate a significant portion of his wealth to help with the fire damage in LA, it is possible that he could still remain the world’s richest man. However, it is important to remember that wealth is not infinite, and there are many factors that could impact Musk’s ranking on the list of the world’s richest individuals.
Ultimately, whether or not Musk could pay for the LA fire damage and still be the world’s richest man is a complex question that depends on a variety of variables. However, it is clear that Musk has the resources and the potential to make a significant impact on the recovery efforts in California.
Tags:
Elon Musk, LA fire damage, world’s richest man, wealth, philanthropy, disaster relief, natural disasters, financial impact, billionaire, charity, social responsibility, wildfire recovery.
#Elon #Musk #pay #fire #damage #worlds #richest #man