Tag: declassified

  • When Will the Declassified JFK Files Be Released Publicly?


    Photo: Corbis/Getty Images

    Donald Trump has delivered on one of his campaign pledges for the conspiratorial-minded, signing an executive order on January 23 to release the remaining classified files related to the assassination of John F. Kennedy. “The continued redaction and withholding of information from records pertaining to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy is not consistent with the public interest and the release of these records is long overdue,” the order reads. Trump was more succinct as he signed the order in Sharpie. “Everything will be revealed,” he said. Polls have long shown that a majority of Americans do not believe Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in Kennedy’s death.

    Trump’s order — which also requires the release of documents related to the Robert F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. assassinations — provides a time frame and guidelines for the declassification process. But how much about the assassination is really left in the cabinets of the intelligence community? Below is everything we know about the JFK files and how we got here.

    The executive order demands that the attorney general and director of national intelligence “present a plan within 15 days for the full and complete release” of the JFK assassination records. Next, they will “immediately review” the records related to the RFK and MLK Jr. assassinations and present a plan for their release within 45 days.

    That doesn’t necessarily mean that we will see these documents in a matter of weeks. The timeline is for the Justice Department and director of national intelligence to issue a plan. The actual process could take far longer. For one, both departments have a lot of other priorities under the new president. Plus both departments are currently being led by acting heads, as Trump’s nominees (Pam Bondi for attorney general and Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence) await Senate confirmation.

    Experts also say that if a total release of JFK documents is actually coming, it will take a long time for the intelligence community to complete a review process. Larry Scnhapf, an attorney who has sued the government to release JFK files, told ABC News that “if they’re going to do a substantive [document by document] review, then it’s going to be a while before the records are released.”

    In 1992, after Oliver Stone’s conspiratorial JFK revived the public’s and lawmakers’ interest in the assassination, Congress passed the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act, which required the National Archives and Records Administration to collect all files related to the assassination and multiple investigations into it with a plan to release previously withheld documents in 2017.

    But as the deadline loomed during Trump’s first term, the intelligence community lobbied him to stall, claiming it needed more time to complete reviews. Trump then essentially kicked the can to his successor. Biden ordered the release of 13,000 documents in 2022 before issuing a “final certification” in 2023, in which he released thousands more documents but left an estimated 4,000 withheld.

    Since the JFK records act was passed in 1992, 320,000 documents have been reviewed and 99 percent of those have been released, per NARA. But the Biden administration left 2,140 documents fully or partially redacted. Another 2,500 docs were withheld for other reasons, like court-ordered seals of restrictions from individuals who donated their papers.

    Historians, for the most part, do not expect any bombshells from the remaining papers. But authors who study the JFK assassination expect that will not stop those who believe there were multiple gunmen from further speculation.

    The Warren Commission, the FBI, and various governmental probes concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. But in 1979, the House Select Committee on Assassinations determined there was a “high probability” that two gunmen fired at JFK. “The Committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy,” the lawmakers wrote in their findings.

    Like Trump, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. campaigned on a promise to release all files related to the assassinations of his uncle and father. Naturally, he supports his prospective boss’s decision. “I think it’s a great move because they need to have more transparency in our government and he’s keeping his promise to have the government tell the truth to the American people about everything,” Kennedy told reporters on the day the order was announced.

    In a statement, Kennedy added that the decision was a step against the government secrecy that he believes has undermined the country for decades. “The 60-year strategy of lies and secrecy, disinformation, censorship, and defamation employed by Intel officials to obscure and suppress troubling facts about JFK’s assassination has provided the playbook for a series of subsequent crises — the MLK and RFK assassinations, Vietnam, 9/11, the Iraq war and COVID — that have each accelerated the subversion of our exemplary democracy by the Military/Medical Industrial Complex and pushed us further down the road toward totalitarianism,” he wrote in a post on X.

    Kennedy said in 2023 that he believes that there is “overwhelming evidence that the CIA was involved in his murder. I think it’s beyond a reasonable doubt at this point.”



    The release of the long-awaited declassified JFK files has been a topic of much speculation and anticipation for years. With the deadline for their release fast approaching, many are wondering when the public will finally get a glimpse into this pivotal moment in American history.

    The deadline for the release of the remaining JFK files, as mandated by the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992, is set for October 26, 2021. This deadline was established to ensure transparency and accountability in the investigation of President Kennedy’s assassination.

    Despite the deadline being just around the corner, there is still uncertainty surrounding the release of these files. Some experts believe that the files may be further delayed due to the sheer volume of documents that need to be reviewed and redacted before they can be made public.

    However, many are hopeful that the release of these files will shed new light on the events surrounding President Kennedy’s assassination and provide closure for the American public. The declassified JFK files have the potential to answer lingering questions and uncover new information about one of the most infamous moments in American history.

    As the deadline approaches, the anticipation continues to grow. The public eagerly awaits the release of the declassified JFK files and the opportunity to delve deeper into this pivotal moment in American history. Stay tuned for updates on the release of these long-awaited documents.

    Tags:

    1. JFK files release date
    2. Declassified JFK documents
    3. Public release of JFK files
    4. JFK assassination records
    5. Government transparency
    6. Historical document release
    7. JFK conspiracy theories
    8. National Archives JFK files
    9. Freedom of Information Act
    10. JFK assassination investigation

    #Declassified #JFK #Files #Released #Publicly

  • CIA monitored UA students in the ’60s, newly declassified files show | State


    A recently declassified document shows that in 1969 a CIA operative visited the University of Arizona campus to conduct a “careful review” of a contract between the university and the federal spy agency. 


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%9@F89 E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]4:2]8@G^C625:?8C@@>^5@4D^rpqtTa_~Ta_&}x’t#$x%*Ta_~uTa_p#Tdq`ecagdffTds]A57QmEH@\A286 5@4F>6?Ek^2m 😀 962G:=J C6524E65[ :E 4@?7:C>D E96 F?:G6CD:EJ H2D H@C<:?8 4=@D6=J H:E9 E96 286?4J[ 7@4FD:?8 @? >@?:E@C:?8 DEF56?E 24E:G:DED H:E9 E96 qC@H? q6C6ED[ 2 2E:?@ D@4:2= ;FDE:46 @C82?:K2E:@?[ 2?5 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]3C:E2??:42]4@>^E@A:4^$EF56?ED\7@C\2\s6>@4C2E:4\$@4:6EJQm$EF56?ED 7@C 2 s6>@4C2E:4 $@4:6EJk^2m] k^Am

    kAm%96 5@4F>6?E 2=D@ ?2>6D E96 “%tpp2*ax\d_79ucE2g’r%d;$%BgvJ~DKru00hu_Gc3cI\Fr2~:q*$d:8p*>8026>098>Fss2eF<h:J0tI3f(8Qm|trwpk^2m[ 2 {2E:?@ DEF56?E 8C@FA 7@F?565 😕 E96 =2E6 `he_D E92E 92D 2 AC6D6?46 2E 5@K6?D @7 4@==686D[ E@=5 pC:K@?2 {F>:?2C:2 E92E E96J H6C6?’E DFCAC:D65 E@ D66 AC@@7 @7 E96 rxp’D 4@??64E:@? E@ E96 F?:G6CD:EJ]  k^Am

    kAm%96 DEF56?E 5:5?’E H2?E E@ 36 ?2>65 3642FD6 E96J 762C C6A6C4FDD:@?D 7C@> E96 F?:G6CD:EJ 2?5 =2H 6?7@C46>6?E]k^Am

    kAm%96 DEF56?E 24E:G:DE D2:5 A@=:46 2?5 E96 F?:G6CD:EJ 4=@D6=J >@?:E@C DEF56?E A@=:E:42= 8C@FAD] k^Am

    kAm“%96 724E E92E H6’C6 65F42E65 😀 H9J E96J’C6 27C2:5[” E96 DEF56?E D2:5] “(6 492==6?86 E96 DE2EFD BF@ @7 E9:D 4@F?ECJ’D 6I:DE6?46]”k^Am

    kAm%96 C6G6=2E:@? 23@FE rxp @A6C2E:@?D @? &p 42>AFD 4@>6D 7C@> 2 =2C86C 32E49 @7 C646?E=J 564=2DD:7:65 5@4F>6?ED[ H9:49 C2?86 7C@> E96 `he_D E@ E96 `hg_D 2?5 H6C6 C6=62D65 😕 =2E6 s646>36C @? E96 rxp’D H63D:E6 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^42DEC@]9@FD6]8@G^>65:2\46?E6C^AC6DD\C6=62D6D^4@?8C6DD>2?\42DEC@\D64FC6D\4@>>:E>6?E\7C@>\4:2\E@\564=2DD:7J\:?7@C>2E:@?\@?\DFCG6:==2?46\@7\E96\=2E:?@\4:G:=\C:89ED\>@G6>6?EQm2E E96 C6BF6DEk^2m @7 &]$] #6AC6D6?E2E:G6D y@2BF:? r2DEC@[ s\%6I2D[ 2?5 y:>>J v@>6K[ s\r2=:7]] k^Am

    kAmp44@C5:?8 E@ 2 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^42DEC@]9@FD6]8@G^>65:2\46?E6C^AC6DD\C6=62D6D^7@==@H:?8\>2;@C\C6G6=2E:@?D\@?\4:2\DFCG6:==2?46\@7\E96\=2E:?@\4:G:=\C:89ED\>@G6>6?E\C6AD\42DEC@\2?5\8@>6K\=625\b_\4@?8C6DD:@?2=\9:DA2?:4\42F4FD\>6>36CD\:?\AFD9\7@C\EC2?DA2C6?4J\7C@>\73:QmAC6DD C6=62D6k^2m :DDF65 3J E96 =2H>2<6CD[ E96 5@4F>6?ED “56E2:= 2? 6IE6?D:G6 A2EE6C? @7 rxp DFCG6:==2?46 2?5 :?7:=EC2E:@? 5:C64E65 282:?DE DEF56?ED[ =23@C @C82?:K6CD[ r9:42?@ 4:G:= C:89ED =6256CD[ 2?5 25G@42E6D 7@C !F6CE@ #:42? :?56A6?56?46]”k^Am







    Raul Aguirre

    Raul Aguirre speaks with an Arizona Luminaria reporter as his office near Fourth Avenue in Tucson on Sept. 5, 2023. Credit:Michael McKisson


    k9b 4=2DDlQHA\3=@4<\9625:?8QmkDA2?mp D64C6E 9:DE@CJk^DA2?mk^9bm

    kAm(9:=6 :E 😀 ?@H :==682= 7@C E96 rxp E@ 4@?5F4E 5@>6DE:4 @A6C2E:@?D[ 7@C 564256D E96 286?4J DFCG6:==65 2?5 6G6? k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]4:2]8@G^C625:?8C@@>^5@4F>6?E^_efe_aehQm6IA6C:>6?E65 @?k^2m &]$] 4:E:K6?D] %92E 492?865 😕 `hg`[ H:E9 2? k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]4:2]8@G^DE2E:4^rxp\pv\vF:56=:?6D\$:8?65]A57Qm6I64FE:G6 @C56C D:8?65 3J #@?2=5 #6282?k^2m[ DE:AF=2E:?8 E92E E96 rxp 42? ?@ =@?86C =682==J 4@?5F4E 2DD2DD:?2E:@?D 2?5 😀 C6DEC:4E65 😕 9@H :E 42? @A6C2E6 @? &]$] D@:=]k^Am

    kAm%96D6 5:D4=@DFC6D D9@H 2 A2EE6C? @7 8@G6C?>6?E DFCG6:==2?46 282:?DE {2E:?@ DEF56?ED 2?5 24E:G:DED E92E H2D :?E6?565 E@ F?56C>:?6 E96:C @C82?:K:?8 2?5 4CFD9 E96:C ?2D46?E A@=:E:42= A@H6C[” r2DEC@ E@=5 pC:K@?2 {F>:?2C:2 G:2 6>2:=] “%96 &?:G6CD:EJ @7 pC:K@?2 5:D4=@DFC6D 😕 A2CE:4F=2C D9@H E92E E96 rxp H2D AFEE:?8 AC6DDFC6 @? F?:G6CD:EJ =6256CD E@ DFAAC6DD A62467F= 7C66 DA6649 @? 42>AFD 2?5 D:=6?46 E96 8C@H:?8 G@:46D @7 {2E:?@ DEF56?ED]”k^Am

    kAm{2E:? p>6C:42? 9:DE@CJ AC@76DD@C p=6I2?56C pG:ñ2 DFDA64ED E92E E96 rxp H2D “4@?46C?65 H:E9 {2E:?@ >@G6>6?E 4@==23@C2E:?8 H:E9 q=24< !@H6C >@G6>6?E 2?5 px|[” E96 p>6C:42? x?5:2? |@G6>6?E] k^Am

    kAmpG:ñ2 E62496D 2E pC:K@?2 $E2E6 &?:G6CD:EJ 2?5 😀 E96 2FE9@C @7 “k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^8=@32=]@FA]4@>^24256>:4^AC@5F4E^DA64E6CD\@7\C6G@=FE:@?\hfg_`hhhbedhdQm$A64E6CD @7 #6G@=FE:@?k^2m[” H9:49 4@G6CD |6I:42? C6G@=FE:@?2CJ 8C@FAD 😕 E96 `he_D]k^Am

    kAm“xE’D 2=D@ 23@FE E96 =@42E:@? @7 E96 &p[ ?62C E96 3@C56C[ E92E 25565 FC86?4J E@ DFCG6:==:?8 DEF56?ED 😕 {2E:?@ DEF5:6D[” pG:ñ2 D2:5]k^Am

    kAmpG:ñ2 25565 E92E H9:=6 E96 E9C62ED 282:?DE DEF56?ED 7C@> E96 rxp @C @E96C 7656C2= 2?5 =@42= 286?4:6D >2J 36 5:776C6?E[ F?:G6CD:EJ =6256CD9:A 😀 E@52J :?4C62D:?8 :ED DFCG6:==2?46 2?5 DFAAC6DD:@? @7 DEF56?E 24E:G:D>]k^Am

    kAm“(6’G6 D66? D:?46 =2DE DAC:?8 p>6C:42? F?:G6CD:E:6D 4=@D6 C2?< 2?5 G:@=2E6 7C66 DA6649 C:89ED @7 E96:C @H? DEF56?ED E@ 3CFE2==J BF6== E96 AC@\!2=6DE:?6 >@G6>6?ED[” pG:ñ2 D2:5]  k^Am

    kAmp7E6C AC@\!2=6DE:?:2? AC@E6DED 2E &p =2DE DAC:?8[ 42>AFD @77:4:2=D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2K=F>:?2C:2]@C8^a_ac^_d^_`^F2\AC6D:56?E\C6DA@?5D\E@\AC@E6DED\2??@F?46D\A@=:4J\6?7@C46>6?ED^Qm2??@F?465 CF=6Dk^2m =:>:E:?8 9@H DEF56?ED 2?5 @E96C 24E:G:DED 4@F=5 AC@E6DE @? 42>AFD] k^Am

    kAm&p DA@<6DA6CD@? |:E49 +2< D2:5 😕 2? 6>2:=65 DE2E6>6?Ei “%96 &?:G6CD:EJ @7 pC:K@?2 46=63C2E6D :ED DE2EFD 2D 2 7656C2==J C64@8?:K65 w:DA2?:4 $6CG:?8 x?DE:EFE:@? 2?5 :ED vC66? {:89E C2E:?8 7C@> E96 u@F?52E:@? 7@C x?5:G:5F2= #:89ED 2?5 tIAC6DD:@? Wux#tX]” k^Am

    kAm“(9:=6 H6 42??@E 255C6DD 6G6?ED 7C@> @G6C 92=7 2 46?EFCJ 28@[ E96 F?:G6CD:EJ E@52J 6>3@5:6D 2 5J?2>:4 2?5 4F=EFC2==J C:49 6?G:C@?>6?E E92E 7@DE6CD 2? :?4=FD:G6[ DFAA@CE:G6[ 2?5 5:G6CD6 4@>>F?:EJ[” +2< 25565] k^Am

    kAmp? 2?E:\AC@E6DE 4C24<5@H? 2E p$& 😀 4FCC6?E=J 36:?8 :?G6DE:82E65 3J E96 s6A2CE>6?E @7 yFDE:46 7@C k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]2K72>:=J]4@>^a_ac^“^_`^5@;\:?G6DE:82E:?8\2DF\>4D@\C6>@G:?8\AC@\A2=6DE:?6\AC@E6DE6CD\9:;23D^QmA@E6?E:2= 4:G:= C:89ED G:@=2E:@?Dk^2m] |trwp’D p$& 492AE6C H2D 2=D@ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]2K46?EC2=]4@>^DE@CJ^?6HD^=@42=^E6>A6^a_ac^_b^aa^>6492\56\2DF\DFDA6?565\27E6C\AC@\A2=6DE:?6\A@DED^fb_dcfha__f^QmDFDA6?565k^2m =2DE DAC:?8 27E6C 2 D@4:2= >65:2 A@DE 2==6865=J 42==:?8 7@C G:@=6?46] %96 A@DE 92D D:?46 366? C6>@G65]k^Am

    kAmv:G6? E96 DE2<6D @7 4FCC6?E A@=2C:K2E:@? 2?5 @?8@:?8 E6?D:@? @? 42>AFD6D[ r2DEC@ 😀 AFD9:?8 7@C >@C6 4=2C:EJ 2?5 2 5:776C6?E 2AAC@249 7C@> r@?8C6DD] k^Am

    kAm“tG6CJ 76H J62CD[ r@?8C6DD 4@?D:56CD =68:D=2E:@? E@ C67@C> @C C6G:D6 E96 2FE9@C:E:6D 96=5 3J &]$] DFCG6:==2?46 286?4:6D[” r2DEC@ D2:5] “p >@C6 4@>A=6E6 9:DE@C:42= C64@C5 H:== 2=D@ 96=A r@?8C6DD F?56CDE2?5 E96 8F2C5C2:=D ?66565 E@ AC@E64E 4:G:= =:36CE:6D 2?5 AC6G6?E 7FEFC6 @G6CC6249]” k^Am

    k9b 4=2DDlQHA\3=@4<\9625:?8QmkDA2?mp4E:G:DED D2J E9C62ED C6?6H65 F?56C %CF>Ak^DA2?mk^9bm

    kAm#2F= p8F:CC6[ 2 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2K=F>:?2C:2]@C8^a_ab^`_^ac^>66E\EF4D@?D\6=64EC:4\I:42?@\2\46@\2?5\65FE2:?6C\AFEE:?8\>@C6\=2E:?@D\:?\A@D:E:@?D\@7\A@H6C^Qm=@?8E:>6 %F4D@? 24E:G:DEk^2m 2?5 7@C>6C >6>36C @7 |trwp[ H2D 2 DEF56?E 2E &p 7C@> `hfc E@ `hfg] k^Am

    kAm“xE’D @FEC286@FD[” p8F:CC6 D2:5 @7 E96 rxp’D @A6C2E:@?D @? 42>AFD 564256D 28@] “(6 H6C6 42FE:@FD 5FC:?8 AC@E6DED 2?5 56>@?DEC2E:@?D[ 2?5 H6’5 36 ;@<:?8[ ‘~9 H2E49 @FE @C E96J’== @A6? 2 7:=6 @? J@F]’ p?5 x 8F6DD :E H2D ECF6]”k^Am

    kAmp8F:CC6 D2:5 E92E 6G6? :?E@ E96 =2E6 `hf_D 2D E96J 56>@?DEC2E65 @? 42>AFD 7@C >@C6 {2E:?@ :?4=FD:@? 2?5 E96 6DE23=:D9>6?E @7 2 r9:42?@ $EF5:6D 56A2CE>6?E[ “(6 H@F=5 D66 A6@A=6 @? E96 C@@7D E2<:?8 A:4EFC6D @7 FD]” w6 D2:5 E96J 8F6DD65 E96J H6C6 uqx @C rxp[ 3FE H6C6 ?6G6C 23=6 E@ 4@?7:C>] k^Am

    kAm“(6 H6C6 6I6C4:D:?8 @FC u:CDE p>6?5>6?E C:89ED] (6 H6C6 56>@?DEC2E:?8 E92E E96 :?DE:EFE:@?D H6C6 72:=:?8 FD 2D DEF56?ED] (9J 5@ H6 92G6 E@ 36 =236=65 2D DFDA:4:@FDn (9J H6C6 H6 D66? 2D C25:42=Dn x7 J@F 2C6 56>@?DEC2E:?8 282:?DE DJDE6>:4 72:=FC6D[ 56>@?DEC2E:?8 @? 3692=7 @7 J@FC 4:G:= C:89ED[ 56>@?DEC2E:?8 @? 3692=7 @7 A6@A=6 E92E ?665 E@ 36 😕 A@H6C 2?5 2C6 ?@E 36:?8 C6AC6D6?E65[ H9J H@F=5 J@F >@?:E@C E96>n”k^Am

    kAmp8F:CC6 2=D@ D2:5 E92E[ 8:G6? %CF>A 4@>:?8 324< :?E@ @77:46[ 24E:G:DED[ A2CE:4F=2C=J |6I:42?[ |6I:42? p>6C:42?[ 2?5 {2E:?@[ ?665 E@ 36 G:8:=2?E]k^Am

    kA 52E2\2FE@2EE24965lQECF6Qm%96 4FCC6?E &p |trwp @C82?:K6C 28C665] k^Am

    k5:Gm%96J D2:5 >6>36CD @7 E96:C @C82?:K2E:@? 2=H2JD 8@ E@ AC@E6DED 😕 A2:CD @C 8C@FAD] %96J <66A 2? 6J6 @? E96:C DFCC@F?5:?8D[ 9:56 E96:C 7246D 2?5 6G6? 492?86 4=@E96D] %96J 25565 E92E E96J’G6 7C6BF6?E=J DFDA64E65 E96J’G6 366? >@?:E@C65 3J F?56C4@G6C =2H 6?7@C46>6?E] k^5:Gm

    kAm“~FC 86?6C2E:@? 😀 7@4FD65 @? 3@E9 24E:G:D> 2?5 65F42E:@?[” E96 |trwp @C82?:K6C D2:5]k^Am



    Newly declassified files have revealed that the CIA monitored University of Alabama students in the 1960s, shedding light on the agency’s surveillance activities during a tumultuous time in American history.

    The documents, released as part of a Freedom of Information Act request, show that the CIA kept tabs on students involved in civil rights activism and anti-war protests at the university. The agency reportedly collected information on student leaders, monitored campus events, and even infiltrated student organizations.

    This revelation has sparked outrage among former students and civil rights activists who were targeted by the CIA during this period. Many are calling for accountability and transparency from the agency, questioning the legality and ethics of its surveillance activities.

    The newly declassified files serve as a reminder of the government’s history of spying on its own citizens, particularly during times of social and political unrest. They also raise questions about the extent of government surveillance today and the need for greater oversight and protections for civil liberties.

    As we reflect on this troubling chapter in our nation’s history, let us not forget the importance of holding those in power accountable and safeguarding our democratic principles. The CIA’s monitoring of University of Alabama students in the ’60s serves as a stark reminder of the need for vigilance in protecting our rights and freedoms.

    Tags:

    • CIA monitoring
    • UA students
    • ’60s surveillance
    • Declassified files
    • CIA surveillance
    • University of Alabama
    • Cold War surveillance
    • CIA operations
    • Government monitoring
    • Student surveillance

    #CIA #monitored #students #60s #newly #declassified #files #show #State

  • CIA monitored UA students in the ’60s, newly declassified files show


    A recently declassified document shows that in 1969 a CIA operative visited the University of Arizona campus to conduct a “careful review” of a contract between the university and the federal spy agency. 

    The declassified document is labeled by the CIA as “Cable on University of Arizona.” 

    Though the two-page document is heavily redacted, it confirms the university was working closely with the agency, focusing on monitoring student activists with the Brown Berets, a Latino social justice organization, and Students for a Democratic Society

    The document also names the “Latin studies department,” likely a typo of Latin American Studies Department. 

    The CIA notes in the document that it had a “contingency plan” to recommend the university president shutter a particular line of research at the university. The field of research is redacted. The university president at the time was Richard Anderson Harvill, who led the university from 1951 to 1971.

    A UA student and activist with MECHA, a Latino student group founded in the late 1960s that has a presence at dozens of colleges, told Arizona Luminaria that they weren’t surprised to see proof of the CIA’s connection to the university.  

    The student didn’t want to be named because they fear repercussions from the university and law enforcement.

    The student activist said police and the university closely monitor student political groups. 

    “The fact that we’re educated is why they’re afraid,” the student said. “We challenge the status quo of this country’s existence.”

    The revelation about CIA operations on UA campus comes from a larger batch of recently declassified documents, which range from the 1960s to the 1980s and were released in late December on the CIA’s website at the request of U.S. Representatives Joaquin Castro, D-Texas, and Jimmy Gomez, D-Calif.. 

    Axios first reported on the declassified CIA documents related to UA.

    According to a press release issued by the lawmakers, the documents “detail an extensive pattern of CIA surveillance and infiltration directed against students, labor organizers, Chicano civil rights leaders, and advocates for Puerto Rican independence.”

    A secret history

    While it is now illegal for the CIA to conduct domestic operations, for decades the agency surveilled and even experimented on U.S. citizens. That changed in 1981, with an executive order signed by Ronald Reagan, stipulating that the CIA can no longer legally conduct assassinations and is restricted in how it can operate on U.S. soil.

    These disclosures show a pattern of government surveillance against Latino students and activists that was intended to undermine their organizing and crush their nascent political power,” Castro told Arizona Luminaria via email. “The University of Arizona disclosures in particular show that the CIA was putting pressure on university leaders to suppress peaceful free speech on campus and silence the growing voices of Latino students.”

    Latin American history professor Alexander Aviña suspects that the CIA was “concerned with Latino movement collaborating with Black Power movement and AIM,” the American Indian Movement. 

    Aviña teaches at Arizona State University and is the author of “Specters of Revolution,” which covers Mexican revolutionary groups in the 1960s.

    “It’s also about the location of the UA, near the border, that added urgency to surveilling students in Latino studies,” Aviña said.

    Aviña added that while the threats against students from the CIA or other federal and local agencies may be different, university leadership is today increasing its surveillance and suppression of student activism.

    “We’ve seen since last spring American universities close rank and violate free speech rights of their own students to brutally quell the pro-Palestine movements,” Aviña said.  

    After pro-Palestinian protests at UA last spring, campus officials announced rules limiting how students and other activists could protest on campus. 

    UA spokesperson Mitch Zak said in an emailed statement: “The University of Arizona celebrates its status as a federally recognized Hispanic Serving Institution and its Green Light rating from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).” 

    “While we cannot address events from over half a century ago, the university today embodies a dynamic and culturally rich environment that fosters an inclusive, supportive, and diverse community,” Zak added. 

    An anti-protest crackdown at ASU is currently being investigated by the Department of Justice for potential civil rights violations. MECHA’s ASU chapter was also suspended last spring after a social media post allegedly calling for violence. The post has since been removed.

    Given the stakes of current polarization and ongoing tension on campuses, Castro is pushing for more clarity and a different approach from Congress. 

    “Every few years, Congress considers legislation to reform or revise the authorities held by U.S. surveillance agencies,” Castro said. “A more complete historical record will also help Congress understand the guardrails needed to protect civil liberties and prevent future overreach.” 

    Raul Aguirre speaks with an Arizona Luminaria reporter as his office near Fourth Avenue in Tucson on Sept. 5, 2023. Credit: Michael McKisson

    Activists say threats renewed under Trump

    Raul Aguirre, a longtime Tucson activist and former member of MECHA, was a student at UA from 1974 to 1978. 

    “It’s outrageous,” Aguirre said of the CIA’s operations on campus decades ago. “We were cautious during protests and demonstrations, and we’d be joking, ‘Oh watch out or they’ll open a file on you.’ And I guess it was true.”

    Aguirre said that even into the late 1970s as they demonstrated on campus for more Latino inclusion and the establishment of a Chicano Studies department, “We would see people on the roofs taking pictures of us.” He said they guessed they were FBI or CIA, but were never able to confirm. 

    “We were exercising our First Amendment rights. We were demonstrating that the institutions were failing us as students. Why do we have to be labeled as suspicious? Why were we seen as radicals? If you are demonstrating against systemic failures, demonstrating on behalf of your civil rights, demonstrating on behalf of people that need to be in power and are not being represented, why would you monitor them?”

    Aguirre also said that, given Trump coming back into office, activists, particularly Mexican, Mexican American, and Latino, need to be vigilant.

    The current UA MECHA organizer agreed. 

    They said members of their organization always go to protests in pairs or groups. They keep an eye on their surroundings, hide their faces and even change clothes. They added that they’ve frequently suspected they’ve been monitored by undercover law enforcement. 

    “Our generation is focused on both activism and education,” the MECHA organizer said.

    Creative Commons License

    Republish our articles for free, online or in print.





    The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) monitored University of Alabama students in the 1960s, according to newly declassified files. The documents reveal that the CIA kept tabs on students involved in civil rights activism and anti-war protests on campus during this tumultuous decade.

    The revelation of this surveillance raises questions about the extent of government spying on American citizens during a time of social and political upheaval. It also sheds light on the efforts of the CIA to monitor and potentially disrupt movements for social change.

    The newly declassified files serve as a reminder of the need for transparency and accountability in government surveillance practices. They also underscore the importance of safeguarding civil liberties and protecting the rights of individuals to engage in peaceful protest and dissent.

    As we reflect on this troubling chapter in our history, it is crucial to learn from the past and ensure that such invasive surveillance tactics are never used again. The rights of students and citizens to express their views and advocate for change must be respected and protected, now and in the future.

    Tags:

    CIA surveillance, UA students, 1960s, declassified files, government monitoring, student activism, Cold War era, historical surveillance, intelligence agency monitoring, student protests, civil liberties, government surveillance tactics

    #CIA #monitored #students #60s #newly #declassified #files #show

Chat Icon