The Trump administration won’t be able to remove every undocumented migrant inside the United States, and the success of its promised mass deportation plan is “going to be based on what Congress gives us,” the administration’s new “border czar” Tom Homan told ABC News.
“I’m being realistic,” Homan said in an interview with ABC “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz. “We can do what we can with the money we have. We’re going to try to be efficient, but with more money we have, the more we can accomplish.”
Immigration and Customs Enforcement doesn’t currently have enough funding from Congress to detain all of the undocumented immigrants that the Trump administration says it hopes to arrest, Homan said, so the scope of its enforcement operations is dependent on the scope of funding from Congress.
Trump Administration ‘Border Czar’ Tom Homan talks with Martha Raddatz of ABC News, Jan. 24, 2025.
ABC News
“The more money, the better I’m going to do,” he said.
Watch more of Martha Raddatz’s interview with Tom Homan Sunday on ABC’s ‘This Week’
Homan said success comes down to this: “Take as many public safety threats off the street as possible.”
U.S. Airmen and U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agents guide illegal aliens onto a e C-17 Globemaster III at the Tucson International Airport, Ariz., Jan. 23, 2025.
Senior Airman Devlin Bishop/DoD
That includes deporting “every illegal alien gang member in this country, including Tren de Agua,” the Venezuelan cartel, he added.
“When we see the crime rate from illegal aliens go down, that’s success,” he said. “Every public safety threat removed [from] this country is success. Every national security [threat] we find and remove from the country is a success.”
A photo distributed by the White House shows some of the 75-80 Guatemalan nationals who were repatriated from El Paso, Texas on a military transport plane, Jan. 23, 2025.
@PressSec/X
In the interview airing Sunday, Homan said the U.S. government for the first time ever used military aircraft to transport migrants back to their home country, and it will now be a daily occurrence.
According to U.S. officials, the U.S. military on Thursday flew more than 150 migrants to Guatemala on two separate flights.
In a recent statement, President Trump’s newly-appointed “border czar” has emphasized the importance of a realistic approach to immigration policy. The czar, who has been tasked with overseeing the administration’s efforts to address the crisis at the southern border, stressed that any mass deportation plan would require cooperation from Congress in order to be successful.
The czar acknowledged the challenges that come with implementing such a plan, citing logistical and legal hurdles that must be overcome. He emphasized the need for a comprehensive approach that takes into account the complexities of the immigration system and the realities on the ground.
While the administration has made immigration enforcement a top priority, the czar made it clear that success in this area will ultimately depend on Congress taking action to address the underlying issues driving illegal immigration. He called for bipartisan cooperation to find solutions that are both effective and humane.
As the debate over immigration policy continues to heat up, the czar’s comments serve as a reminder of the need for a pragmatic and collaborative approach to this complex issue. Only by working together can we hope to achieve meaningful and lasting reform.
President Joe Biden ordered all U.S. states to lower their flags to half-staff to acknowledge Carter, who died in his Plains, Georgia home on Dec. 29 at age 100. The flags were ordered to remain at half-staff for 30 days or until Jan. 29. While the country’s flag code dictates flags remain lowered following a president’s death, the code is not mandatory.
Governors in Iowa, Texas, Florida, Tennessee, Oklahoma, North Dakota, Nebraska and Alabama will raise the flags to full staff for Trump on Inauguration Day. Not limited to Republican-led states, New York, California, and Colorado will also hoist the flag on Jan. 20 and then will lower the flag the following day.
“On January 20th, the flags at the Capitol will fly at full-staff to celebrate our country coming together behind the inauguration of our 47th President, Donald Trump,” Johnson said in a statement. “The flags will be lowered back to half-staff the following day to continue honoring President Jimmy Carter.”
Here is what to know about the country’s flags on Inauguration Day.
Why did Joe Biden lower flags for Jimmy Carter?
According to the U.S. General Services Administration, flags are flown at half-staff when the country or a specific state is mourning following national tragedies, for days of remembrance or in the immediate deaths of government or military personnel.
Only the U.S. president, a state governor or the mayor of Washington, D.C. can order flags to fly at half-staff.
Why did states decide to raise to full-staff?
Some governors, both Republican and Democratic, have decided to fly public flags at full-staff to honor Inauguration Day.
“Regardless of your political views, the American tradition of the peaceful transition of power is something to celebrate, said New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, a Democrat.
Other governors either followed suit or had their flags already at full-staff, like in Oklahoma.
“Inauguration day is an important tradition of our Republic where Americans come together to celebrate the peaceful transition of power between presidents,” Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said in a memo he posted on X. “Our nation’s flag will be prominently displayed at full-staff to honor the tradition of our founding fathers and the sacrifices made by those who have served to ensure the torch of liberty continues to burn strong.”
Did Trump want flags to be at full-staff on Inauguration Day?
“They think it’s so great, and are so happy about it because, in actuality, they don’t love our Country, they only think about themselves,” Trump said on social media.
The American flag would “for the first time ever during an Inauguration of a future President, be at half mast,” he added. “Nobody wants to see this, and no American can be happy about it. Let’s see how it plays out.”
What’s the truth? Sign up for USA TODAY’s Checking the Facts newsletter to find out.
Has this ever happened in the past?
To honor the first American prisoners of war released from Vietnam, former President Richard Nixon ordered flags to be raised in February 1973 after they had been lowered for the death of President Lyndon Johnson. The celebration lasted a day before the flags were lowered back to half-staff for the rest of the mourning period.
Contributing: Catherine Messier, Brandi D. Addison, Joey Garrison & C. A. Bridges/ USA TODAY NETWORK, Marty Roney/ Montgomery Advertiser, Dale Denwalt/ The Oklahoman and Kate Kealey/ Des Moines Register
In the United States, the decision to fly flags at half-staff on Inauguration Day in 2025 depends on the state. While there is no federal law mandating that flags be lowered on this day, many states may choose to do so as a sign of respect for the incoming president.
It is always a good idea to check with your state government or local municipality to see if they have issued any proclamations regarding the flying of flags at half-staff on Inauguration Day. Additionally, you can refer to the U.S. Flag Code for guidelines on when and why flags should be flown at half-staff.
Ultimately, the decision to lower flags on Inauguration Day is a symbolic gesture that varies from state to state. Stay informed and honor the traditions of your community by following any official guidelines that are issued.
Tags:
Flags at half-staff, Inauguration Day 2025, state flag protocol, flag etiquette, half-staff guidelines, state flag regulations
This week, Rep. Blake Moore (R-UT), member of the House Committee on Ways and Means, introduced the Family First Act. This bill would significantly increase the Child Tax Credit (CTC), modify or eliminate other family tax provisions, and make the cap on the state and local tax deduction permanent. Rep. Moore and other supporters of this bill argue that it is fiscally responsible: The bill is “fully offset” and would not add to the budget deficit. However, that’s true only if Congress fails to extend the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). If the TCJA is extended, the bill would cost $800 billion over the next decade.
The centerpiece of the Family First Act is a large expansion of the CTC. The maximum credit would be increased to $3,000 per child under 18 ($4,200 for young children). The credit would phase-in starting with the first dollar of adjusted gross income (AGI) and increase proportionally with AGI up to $20,000. A smaller credit of $2,800 would be available to pregnant mothers. Both credits would begin to phase out at AGI over $200,000 ($400,000 for married couples filing jointly). The bill would cap the number of qualifying children at 6 and require that the tax filer and each qualifying child have a valid Social Security Number to qualify for the credit.
The bill also would scale back the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). The EITC would no longer vary based on parents’ number of children. It would phase in at 34 percent of earnings and max out at $4,300, before phasing out at earnings of $33,000. The credit for all eligible married filing jointly households would be up to $700 larger and the phase-out threshold $10,000 higher. The modest EITC for childless adults would remain but be modified.
The Head of Household filing status, which provides slightly more generous tax brackets and other parameters for single parents, would be repealed. The Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit (CDCTC) and the exemption for dependents would be repealed.
Finally, the bill would make permanent the existing $10,000 cap on the State and Local Tax Deduction (SALT).
Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the changes to the CTC and EITC for a married couple with two children. While parents with modest incomes would receive a somewhat smaller EITC, almost all parents would receive a much larger CTC.
Figure 1. Child Tax Credit for married couple with two children of various ages, 2026, assuming Tax Cuts and Jobs Act extended: current policy and Family First Act
Notes: Figure shows Child Tax Credit for married parents with two dependent children of various ages, filing taxes as married filing jointly, for tax year 2026. All income is assumed to come from earnings. Current policy assumes the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is extended without modification. Family First Act assumes the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is extended, except that the provisions of the Family First Act are implemented. Tax parameters for 2026 under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act are projected by the authors, by raising the Internal Revenue Service tax year 2025 parameters by the projected increase in the Chained Consumer Price Index – Urban Series from 2025 to 2026. Sources: Internal Revenue Service Revenue Procedure 2024-40; Congressional Budget Office Tax Parameters and Effective Marginal Tax Rates; Congressman Blake Moore, Family First Act; Authors’ calculations
Figure 2. Earned Income Tax Credit for married couple with two children, 2026, assuming Tax Cuts and Jobs Act extended: current policy and Family First Act
Notes: Figure shows Earned Income Tax Credit for married parents with two dependent children, filing taxes as married filing jointly, for tax year 2026. All income is assumed to come from earnings. Current policy assumes the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is extended without modification. Family First Act assumes the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is extended, except that the provisions of the Family First Act are implemented. Tax parameters for 2026 under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act are projected by the authors, by raising the Internal Revenue Service tax year 2025 parameters by the projected increase in the Chained Consumer Price Index – Urban Series from 2025 to 2026. Sources: Internal Revenue Service Revenue Procedure 2024-40; Congressional Budget Office Tax Parameters and Effective Marginal Tax Rates; Congressman Blake Moore, Family First Act; Authors’ calculations
Whether these reforms are fiscally responsible depends on the budget baseline.
Under a current law baseline, in which the individual income tax provisions of the TCJA expire, this bill would decrease federal deficits. We estimate that the expansion of the CTC would, in isolation, increase the budget deficit by $2.1 trillion over the next decade. This would be more than offset by the $154 billion cut in the EITC, $629 billion from repealing the dependent exemption, $267 billion from repealing head of household filing status, $39 billion from repealing the CDCTC, and $1.6 trillion from the SALT cap. On net, it would raise $558 billion over the decade.
Under a current policy baseline, in which the TCJA provisions are assumed to be permanent, this expansion would end up increasing federal deficits by $794 billion over a decade. This baseline maintains the doubled CTC of $2,000 per child, no personal and dependent exemptions, and the $10,000 SALT cap. While this means the Family First Act’s CTC expansion costs much less ($1.3 trillion vs $2.1 trillion), two of its largest offsets (repeal of the dependent exemption and the $10,000 SALT cap) raise nothing.
Table 1. Budgetary Impact of the Family First Act, 2026-2035
Current Law
Current Policy
CTC Expansion
-$2,089
-$1,310
EITC Modifications
$154
$154
Repeal Dependent Exemption
$629
$0
Repeal Head of Households Filing Status
$267
$322
Repeal The Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit
$39
$38
Cap the State and Local Tax Deduction at $10,000
$1,558
$0
Total
$558
-$794
Source: Tax Calculator Version 4.4.0
The current law baseline is usually the proper way to measure the budgetary impact of policy. It shows how much changes to policy, as legislated, impact projected spending and revenues over the next decade. However, lawmakers are planning on extending the TCJA this year. Thus, it is important to understand how legislation would impact revenue relative to a current policy baseline under which the TCJA is assumed extended.
Simply extending the individual and estate tax provisions of the TCJA will reduce federal revenue by roughly $3.9 trillion over the next decade. Extending and canceling certain business tax provisions pushes the revenue loss to $4.8 trillion. The Family First Act would push the cost to roughly $5.6 trillion. Supporters of this bill would need to find $800 billion in offsets that are not already used in the TCJA extension to avoid further increasing its cost. Alternatively, they would need to spell out which provisions of the TCJA they would scale back by $800 billion.
Though costly overall, the TCJA made several improvements to the individual tax code and much of it is worth keeping. But with federal borrowing at record highs, lawmakers should find ways to reduce the cost of the bill, not increase it.
The Family First Act, which aims to reform the child welfare system by prioritizing family-based care over group homes and institutions, has been a topic of much debate in recent years. One of the key questions surrounding the act is whether it is fiscally responsible.
On one hand, proponents argue that by focusing on prevention and early intervention, the act can ultimately save money in the long run. By providing support services to families before children enter foster care, the hope is that fewer children will need to be placed in costly out-of-home care. Additionally, by prioritizing family-based care, which is often less expensive than group homes or institutions, the act could lead to cost savings for the child welfare system.
On the other hand, critics argue that the act may actually end up costing more money in the short term. Implementing the necessary reforms, such as expanding access to mental health services and substance abuse treatment, could require significant upfront investments. Additionally, there are concerns that the act’s emphasis on family-based care may not be feasible in all cases, potentially leading to increased costs for more intensive services.
Ultimately, whether the Family First Act is fiscally responsible depends on how it is implemented and the extent to which it achieves its intended goals. As with any policy reform, careful monitoring and evaluation will be essential to determine the act’s impact on both outcomes for children and families and the fiscal bottom line.
Tags:
Family First Act, fiscal responsibility, American Enterprise Institute, family support, federal spending, child welfare, social programs
Former president of the Pro Football Writers of America and the author of four books
There’s more than just the NFC North title and No. 1 seed at stake Sunday night when the Detroit Lions host the Minnesota Vikings.
There’s also the timing of when coveted assistants from the Lions and Vikings staffs can interview for head coaching jobs. Coaches from the winning team will be cleared to interview three days after the game, while coaches from the losing team must wait until at least three days after next weekend’s wild-card games conclude.
Lions offensive coordinator Ben Johnson, Lions defensive coordinator Aaron Glenn and Vikings defensive coordinator Brian Flores are considered three of the top head coaching candidates in the upcoming hiring cycle across league circles.
The NFL’s head coach interview rules allow the winner of Sunday night’s game to get a quicker chance at doing a virtual interview with another organization.
In the past, some, if not the majority, of head coaching openings usually were filled by or shortly after the divisional round. But now, the NFL is not even allowing in-person interviews until after that round is completed.
Assistant coaches on Sunday night’s winning team, the NFC’s No. 1 seed, can begin doing virtual head coach interviews as soon as Wednesday and conclude them before the end of next weekend’s wild-card games.
Assistant coaches on Sunday night’s losing team, the NFC’s No. 5 seed, can begin doing virtual head coaching interviews three days after their wild-card game and conclude them before the end of the divisional playoff games.
Only virtual interviews are allowed before the conclusion of the divisional round on Jan. 19. In-person interviews can begin Jan. 20, after the divisional round for coaches whose seasons have concluded.
No second interviews will be allowed until Jan. 27, the bye week, for Super Bowl coaches, and they must be concluded by Feb. 2.
Non-playoff coaches can interview for head coaching jobs three days after their regular season ends. The league has gone out of its way to ensure that teams abide by the Rooney Rule, and each coach supposedly gets a fair chance during the interview process. But the process, in the eyes of some across the league, remains flawed, no matter how much effort has been put into fixing it.
As one source familiar with the interview and hiring process said this weekend: “It’s clunky. In what world do you have to wait this long to hire somebody?”
Despite entertaining multiple head coaching jobs in recent years, Johnson has remained with the Lions (14-2), who enter Sunday night leading the league in scoring (33.3 PPG) and ranking second in total offense (410.5 YPG).
Johnson said last month that he is committed to focusing on the Lions’ pursuit of a championship but admitted “there’s a fire there” when asked about his interest in becoming a head coach.
Glenn is completing his fourth season as Detroit’s defensive coordinator. Despite long-term injuries to several key defensive players, including star defensive end Aidan Hutchinson, the Lions enter Sunday tied for eighth in the league with 24 takeaways.
Flores, who is finishing his second season with the Vikings (14-2), told “The Adam Schefter Podcast” in November that he “would love” to be a head coach in the NFL again. Flores went 24-25 in three seasons as head coach of the Miami Dolphins before being fired after the 2021 season.
Under Flores, the Vikings are tied for the league lead with 31 takeaways, are tied for third in the NFL with 47 sacks and boast the NFL’s fourth-best scoring defense, allowing just 18.8 points per game.
As the Minnesota Vikings gear up to take on the Detroit Lions in a crucial NFC North matchup this weekend, the timing of head coach interviews could heavily depend on the outcome of this game.
If the Vikings come out on top and secure a playoff spot, it could potentially delay any interviews with potential coaching candidates as the focus shifts towards preparing for the postseason. However, if the Lions pull off an upset and the Vikings miss out on the playoffs, the team may look to start the interview process sooner rather than later.
The outcome of this game could have significant implications not only on the Vikings’ season but also on the future of the coaching staff. Keep an eye on how things unfold this weekend as it could have a major impact on the timing of head coach interviews.
In the world of Human Resources, navigating employee relations can be a complex and challenging task. From handling conflicts between coworkers to addressing performance issues with employees, there are a multitude of scenarios that HR professionals must be prepared to handle. In this post, we will delve into some real-life case studies that showcase the importance of understanding that every situation is unique and that the best course of action “depends” on the specific circumstances at hand.
Case Study #1: Conflict Resolution
Scenario: Two employees, Sarah and John, have been at odds with each other for weeks. Their constant bickering is affecting team morale and productivity.
Approach: HR could schedule a mediation session to allow both employees to air their grievances in a safe and neutral environment. By facilitating open communication and helping the employees find common ground, HR can work towards a resolution that benefits both parties and the overall team.
Case Study #2: Performance Management
Scenario: Mark, an employee, has been consistently missing deadlines and producing subpar work. His manager has addressed the issue multiple times, but there has been no improvement.
Approach: HR could conduct a performance review with Mark to clearly outline expectations and provide constructive feedback. Setting measurable goals and offering support and resources for improvement can help Mark understand the consequences of his actions and motivate him to make positive changes.
Case Study #3: Employee Conduct
Scenario: Lisa, an employee, has been spreading rumors about her coworkers and creating a toxic work environment. Several employees have lodged complaints against her behavior.
Approach: HR could conduct a thorough investigation into the complaints and gather evidence to support any disciplinary action. By addressing the issue promptly and fairly, HR can send a clear message that such behavior will not be tolerated in the workplace.
These case studies highlight the importance of taking a tailored approach to employee relations and understanding that there is no one-size-fits-all solution. By considering the unique circumstances of each situation and utilizing effective communication and conflict resolution techniques, HR professionals can effectively navigate the complexities of employee relations. Remember, when it comes to handling HR matters, it truly does depend on the specifics of the case at hand.
#Depends #Employee #Relations #Case #Studies #Human #Resources #Students #Professionals,students and
professionals
In today’s fast-paced and ever-changing world, effective leadership is more important than ever. And when it comes to leading others, there is no better approach than walkalongside leadership. This style of leadership is all about being present, engaged, and supportive of your team members every step of the way.
Walkalongside leadership is not about micromanaging or dictating orders. Instead, it’s about guiding, empowering, and inspiring your team to reach their full potential. It’s about being a mentor, a coach, and a cheerleader all rolled into one. It’s about showing empathy, understanding, and genuine care for the well-being of your team members.
When you lead like life depends on it, you create a culture of trust, collaboration, and accountability within your team. You foster a sense of belonging and purpose that motivates your team members to give their best every day. You become a source of inspiration and guidance, leading by example and setting the tone for excellence.
So, if you want to be a truly effective leader, lead like life depends on it. Embrace walkalongside leadership and watch as your team thrives, your organization succeeds, and your impact grows exponentially. Lead with passion, purpose, and a commitment to supporting and empowering those around you. Lead like life depends on it.
#Lead #Life #Depends #Power #Walkalongside #Leadership
Price: $5.99 (as of Nov 21,2024 05:22:31 UTC – Details)
Publisher : Business Plus; First Edition (May 21, 2013) Language : English Hardcover : 288 pages ISBN-10 : 1455523305 ISBN-13 : 978-1455523306 Item Weight : 1.05 pounds Dimensions : 6.25 x 1.13 x 9.38 inches
Customers say
Customers find the book extremely worthwhile, interesting, and well worth the time. They say it provides an enlightening take on how to take full advantage of technology. Readers also appreciate the current examples and case studies. In addition, they describe the style as warm, inviting, and clear.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
In today’s fast-paced world, it’s easy to get caught up in the daily grind of running a business and forget to take a step back and evaluate where you’re headed. But if you want to ensure the success of your business, it’s important to hit the Ctrl Alt Delete button and reboot your strategy.
Just like a computer that needs a fresh start every now and then to run smoothly, your business also needs a reboot to stay relevant and competitive in the market. Take a look at your current processes, products, and services – are they still meeting the needs of your customers? Are there areas that need improvement or innovation?
Rebooting your business doesn’t just mean making changes to your operations – it also means taking a look at your own life and well-being. Are you taking care of yourself and maintaining a healthy work-life balance? Your personal health and happiness are crucial to the success of your business.
Remember, your future depends on the decisions you make today. So take the time to Ctrl Alt Delete, reboot your business, reboot your life, and set yourself up for success in the years to come.
#Ctrl #Alt #Delete #Reboot #Business #Reboot #Life #Future #Depends
You must be logged in to post a comment.