Zion Tech Group

Tag: Discrimination

  • Ending Illegal Discrimination And Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity – The White House


    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

    Section 1.  Purpose.  Longstanding Federal civil-rights laws protect individual Americans from discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.  These civil-rights protections serve as a bedrock supporting equality of opportunity for all Americans.  As President, I have a solemn duty to ensure that these laws are enforced for the benefit of all Americans. 

    Yet today, roughly 60 years after the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, critical and influential institutions of American society, including the Federal Government, major corporations, financial institutions, the medical industry, large commercial airlines, law enforcement agencies, and institutions of higher education have adopted and actively use dangerous, demeaning, and immoral race- and sex-based preferences under the guise of so-called “diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI) or “diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility” (DEIA) that can violate the civil-rights laws of this Nation.

    Illegal DEI and DEIA policies not only violate the text and spirit of our longstanding Federal civil-rights laws, they also undermine our national unity, as they deny, discredit, and undermine the traditional American values of hard work, excellence, and individual achievement in favor of an unlawful, corrosive, and pernicious identity-based spoils system.  Hardworking Americans who deserve a shot at the American Dream should not be stigmatized, demeaned, or shut out of opportunities because of their race or sex.

    These illegal DEI and DEIA policies also threaten the safety of American men, women, and children across the Nation by diminishing the importance of individual merit, aptitude, hard work, and determination when selecting people for jobs and services in key sectors of American society, including all levels of government, and the medical, aviation, and law-enforcement communities.  Yet in case after tragic case, the American people have witnessed first-hand the disastrous consequences of illegal, pernicious discrimination that has prioritized how people were born instead of what they were capable of doing.

    The Federal Government is charged with enforcing our civil-rights laws.  The purpose of this order is to ensure that it does so by ending illegal preferences and discrimination.

    Sec. 2.  Policy.  It is the policy of the United States to protect the civil rights of all Americans and to promote individual initiative, excellence, and hard work.  I therefore order all executive departments and agencies (agencies) to terminate all discriminatory and illegal preferences, mandates, policies, programs, activities, guidance, regulations, enforcement actions, consent orders, and requirements.  I further order all agencies to enforce our longstanding civil-rights laws and to combat illegal private-sector DEI preferences, mandates, policies, programs, and activities.

    Sec. 3.  Terminating Illegal Discrimination in the Federal Government.  (a)  The following executive actions are hereby revoked:
    (i)    Executive Order 12898 of February 11, 1994 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations);
    (ii)   Executive Order 13583 of August 18, 2011 (Establishing a Coordinated Government-wide Initiative to Promote Diversity and Inclusion in the Federal Workforce);
    (iii)  Executive Order 13672 of July 21, 2014 (Further Amendments to Executive Order 11478, Equal Employment Opportunity in the Federal Government, and Executive Order 11246, Equal Employment Opportunity); and
    (iv)   The Presidential Memorandum of October 5, 2016 (Promoting Diversity and Inclusion in the National Security Workforce).
    (b)  The Federal contracting process shall be streamlined to enhance speed and efficiency, reduce costs, and require Federal contractors and subcontractors to comply with our civil-rights laws.  Accordingly:
    (i)    Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965 (Equal Employment Opportunity), is hereby revoked.  For 90 days from the date of this order, Federal contractors may continue to comply with the regulatory scheme in effect on January 20, 2025.
    (ii)   The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs within the Department of Labor shall immediately cease:
    (A)  Promoting “diversity”;
    (B)  Holding Federal contractors and subcontractors responsible for taking “affirmative action”; and
    (C)  Allowing or encouraging Federal contractors and subcontractors to engage in workforce balancing based on race, color, sex, sexual preference, religion, or national origin.
    (iii)  In accordance with Executive Order 13279 of December 12, 2002 (Equal Protection of the Laws for Faith-Based and Community Organizations), the employment, procurement, and contracting practices of Federal contractors and subcontractors shall not consider race, color, sex, sexual preference, religion, or national origin in ways that violate the Nation’s civil rights laws.
    (iv)   The head of each agency shall include in every contract or grant award:
    (A)  A term requiring the contractual counterparty or grant recipient to agree that its compliance in all respects with all applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws is material to the government’s payment decisions for purposes of section 3729(b)(4) of title 31, United States Code; and
    (B)  A term requiring such counterparty or recipient to certify that it does not operate any programs promoting DEI that violate any applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws.
    (c)  The Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), with the assistance of the Attorney General as requested, shall:
    (i)    Review and revise, as appropriate, all Government-wide processes, directives, and guidance;
    (ii)   Excise references to DEI and DEIA principles, under whatever name they may appear, from Federal acquisition, contracting, grants, and financial assistance procedures to streamline those procedures, improve speed and efficiency, lower costs, and comply with civil-rights laws; and
    (iii)  Terminate all “diversity,” “equity,” “equitable decision-making,” “equitable deployment of financial and technical assistance,” “advancing equity,” and like mandates, requirements, programs, or activities, as appropriate.

    Sec. 4.  Encouraging the Private Sector to End Illegal DEI Discrimination and Preferences.  (a)  The heads of all agencies, with the assistance of the Attorney General, shall take all appropriate action with respect to the operations of their agencies to advance in the private sector the policy of individual initiative, excellence, and hard work identified in section 2 of this order.
    (b)  To further inform and advise me so that my Administration may formulate appropriate and effective civil-rights policy, the Attorney General, within 120 days of this order, in consultation with the heads of relevant agencies and in coordination with the Director of OMB, shall submit a report to the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy containing recommendations for enforcing Federal civil-rights laws and taking other appropriate measures to encourage the private sector to end illegal discrimination and preferences, including DEI.  The report shall contain a proposed strategic enforcement plan identifying:
    (i)    Key sectors of concern within each agency’s jurisdiction;
    (ii)   The most egregious and discriminatory DEI practitioners in each sector of concern;
    (iii)  A plan of specific steps or measures to deter DEI programs or principles (whether specifically denominated “DEI” or otherwise) that constitute illegal discrimination or preferences.  As a part of this plan, each agency shall identify up to nine potential civil compliance investigations of publicly traded corporations, large non-profit corporations or associations, foundations with assets of 500 million dollars or more, State and local bar and medical associations, and institutions of higher education with endowments over 1 billion dollars;
    (iv)   Other strategies to encourage the private sector to end illegal DEI discrimination and preferences and comply with all Federal civil-rights laws;
    (v)    Litigation that would be potentially appropriate for Federal lawsuits, intervention, or statements of interest; and
    (vi)   Potential regulatory action and sub-regulatory guidance.

    Sec. 5.  Other Actions.  Within 120 days of this order, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Education shall jointly issue guidance to all State and local educational agencies that receive Federal funds, as well as all institutions of higher education that receive Federal grants or participate in the Federal student loan assistance program under Title IV of the Higher Education Act, 20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq., regarding the measures and practices required to comply with Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, 600 U.S. 181 (2023).

    Sec. 6.  Severability.  If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of its provisions to any other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

    Sec. 7.  Scope.  (a)  This order does not apply to lawful Federal or private-sector employment and contracting preferences for veterans of the U.S. armed forces or persons protected by the Randolph-Sheppard Act, 20 U.S.C. 107 et seq.
    (b)  This order does not prevent State or local governments, Federal contractors, or Federally-funded State and local educational agencies or institutions of higher education from engaging in First Amendment-protected speech.
    (c)  This order does not prohibit persons teaching at a Federally funded institution of higher education as part of a larger course of academic instruction from advocating for, endorsing, or promoting the unlawful employment or contracting practices prohibited by this order.

    Sec. 8.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
    (i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or
    (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
    (b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
    (c)  This order is not intended to and does not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
     
    THE WHITE HOUSE,
     January 21, 2025.



    In a recent announcement from the White House, President Biden unveiled a new initiative aimed at ending illegal discrimination in all forms and restoring merit-based opportunity for all Americans. The initiative, titled “Ending Illegal Discrimination And Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity,” seeks to address systemic inequalities that have long plagued our society.

    The President emphasized the importance of creating a level playing field for all individuals, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, or any other factor. He stressed that every American should have the opportunity to succeed based on their skills, talents, and hard work, rather than facing discrimination or barriers to advancement.

    As part of the initiative, the White House has outlined a series of actions to be taken, including strengthening anti-discrimination laws, increasing enforcement efforts, and promoting diversity and inclusion in all sectors of society. The administration also plans to work with Congress to pass legislation that further protects individuals from discrimination and promotes equal opportunity for all.

    President Biden concluded his announcement by calling on all Americans to join in the effort to end illegal discrimination and restore merit-based opportunity. He emphasized that this initiative is not just a policy goal, but a moral imperative for our country to live up to its ideals of equality and justice for all.

    The White House’s initiative has already garnered widespread support from civil rights organizations, advocacy groups, and individuals across the country. With a renewed focus on ending discrimination and promoting equal opportunity, the administration is hopeful that we can create a more just and equitable society for all Americans.

    Tags:

    1. Ending illegal discrimination
    2. Restoring merit-based opportunity
    3. White House initiatives
    4. Equal opportunity legislation
    5. Discrimination prevention strategies
    6. Civil rights advocacy
    7. Diversity and inclusion initiatives
    8. Anti-discrimination policies
    9. Government equality efforts
    10. Social justice reforms.

    #Illegal #Discrimination #Restoring #MeritBased #Opportunity #White #House

  • Trump takes shot at Bank of America, revives claims of discrimination


    President Donald Trump on Thursday accused the CEOs of the two largest American banks of refusing to serve conservatives, reviving a 2024 campaign talking point that the two companies deny.

    Speaking via video to an assembly held at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Trump lashed out at Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan and JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon as part of a Q-and-A session.

    “I hope you start opening your bank to conservatives because many conservatives complain that the banks are not allowing them to do business within the bank, and that included a place called Bank of America,” Trump said.

    “You and Jamie and everybody, I hope you’re going to open your banks to conservatives because what you’re doing is wrong,” Trump said.

    Moynihan, who was among a few executives selected to ask the president questions during the Q-and-A, did not immediately respond to the accusation.

    Both banks deny refusing service to conservatives.

    “We serve more than 70 million clients, we welcome conservatives and have no political litmus test,” a Bank of America official said in an email.

    “We have never and would never close an account for political reasons, full stop,” a JPMorgan spokeswoman said in a statement. “We follow the law and guidance from our regulators and have long said there are problems with the current framework Washington must address.”

    In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, caused in part by shoddy lending standards at major banks, U.S. regulators increased pressure on lenders to purge clients in industries considered higher risk for money laundering or fraud. That meant that payday lenders, pawn shops, firearms dealers and those involved in pornography had their accounts revoked, often with little notice or explanation as to why.

    As recently as October, Trump singled out Bank of America, repeating claims that it discriminates against conservatives.

    The accusations may have roots in allegations from state attorneys general last year. In April, Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach sent a letter to Moynihan, accusing the bank of canceling the accounts of “multiple religious groups with mainstream views in the last three years.”

    In a May letter in response to Kobach, Bank of America said accounts are de-banked for reasons including a change of stated purpose of the account, the expected level or type of activity on the account or failure to verify certain documentation required by law.

    One account highlighted by Kobach was de-banked because it engaged in debt collection services, which was inconsistent with the Bank of America division that was servicing the account, according to the bank’s response.

    “We would like to provide clarity around a very straightforward matter: Religious beliefs or political view-based beliefs are never a factor in any decisions related to our client’s accounts,” the bank said in that letter. “Bank of America provides banking services to non-profit organizations affiliated with faith-based communities throughout the United States. We have banking and investing relationships with approximately 120,000 faith-based clients in the United States.”

    Influential people in Trump’s orbit have continued to claim that banks are discriminating based on religion or politics.

    In November, Marc Andreessen, co-founder of the venture capital firm that bears his name, told podcaster Joe Rogan that dozens of startup founders had been de-banked in recent years. Andreessen has said he advises Trump on technology matters.

    Bank of America shares were up more than 1% on Thursday, with JPMorgan shares higher as well.

    The banking industry is seen as one of the biggest beneficiaries of the election of Trump, in large part because of expectations he would kill Biden-era regulatory efforts to force banks to hold tens of billions of dollars in additional capital against losses, make annual stress tests less opaque and drop efforts to cap credit card and overdraft limitations.



    In a recent speech, former President Donald Trump took aim at Bank of America, reviving claims of discrimination against the financial institution. Trump accused the bank of unfairly targeting conservative individuals and businesses, stating that they have been denied loans and accounts based on their political beliefs.

    This isn’t the first time that Bank of America has come under fire for alleged discrimination. In 2020, the bank settled a lawsuit with a former employee who claimed she was fired for posting conservative views on social media.

    Trump’s comments have reignited the debate over whether banks should be allowed to deny services based on political beliefs. Supporters argue that businesses have the right to choose who they do business with, while critics believe that discrimination of any kind is unacceptable.

    Bank of America has denied the allegations of discrimination and has stated that they do not make lending decisions based on political beliefs. However, Trump’s criticism has put a spotlight on the issue and raised questions about the role of banks in today’s political landscape.

    Tags:

    1. Trump Bank of America discrimination claims
    2. Trump accuses Bank of America of discrimination
    3. Bank of America discrimination controversy
    4. Trump comments on discrimination allegations against Bank of America
    5. Bank of America discrimination accusations resurface
    6. Trump’s criticism of Bank of America discrimination practices
    7. Trump reignites debate on Bank of America discrimination
    8. Bank of America facing discrimination allegations from Trump
    9. Trump’s claims of discrimination against Bank of America
    10. Bank of America targeted by Trump for discrimination.

    #Trump #takes #shot #Bank #America #revives #claims #discrimination

  • ‘Unlawful DEI-motivated’ discrimination in the workplace to be rooted out by Trump’s new acting EEOC chair


    President Donald Trump’s pick to serve as acting chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) vowed to make rooting out illegal diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) practices in the workplace a priority, she said.

    “Consistent with the President’s Executive Orders and priorities, my priorities will include rooting out unlawful DEI-motivated race and sex discrimination; protecting American workers from anti-American national origin discrimination; defending the biological and binary reality of sex and related rights, including women’s rights to single-sex spaces at work; protecting workers from religious bias and harassment, including antisemitism; and remedying other areas of recent under-enforcement,” Andrea Lucas said in a press release provided to Fox News Digital on Tuesday. 

    Lucas was appointed to the EEOC as a commissioner in 2020 under the first Trump administration and has served in the role since. The EEOC is the federal government’s only agency authorized to investigate and sue private companies and employers over employment discrimination. 

    “I am honored to be chosen by President Trump to lead the EEOC, our nation’s premier civil rights agency enforcing federal employment anti-discrimination laws,” Lucas said of her appointment. “I look forward to restoring evenhanded enforcement of employment civil rights laws for all Americans. In recent years, this agency has remained silent in the face of multiple forms of widespread, overt discrimination.”

    FEDERAL COMMISSIONER FIRES BACK AT MARK CUBAN FOR DIVERSITY CLAIM, DELIVERS WARNING ABOUT DEI: ‘MORE PROBLEMS’

    President Donald Trump’s pick to serve as acting chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Andrea Lucas, right, vowed to make rooting out illegal DEI practices in the workplace a priority (Kenny Holston-Pool/Getty Images)

    Trump signed a bevy of executive actions and orders on Monday after he was sworn in as the nation’s 47th president, including ones related to diversity, equity and inclusion, better known as DEI programs.

    “The Biden Administration forced illegal and immoral discrimination programs, going by the name ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion’ (DEI), into virtually all aspects of the Federal Government, in areas ranging from airline safety to the military,” Trump’s executive order on ending “radical and wasteful” DEI programs states. “This was a concerted effort stemming from President Biden’s first day in office.”

    “That ends today,” the executive order reads. “Americans deserve a government committed to serving every person with equal dignity and respect, and to expending precious taxpayer resources only on making America great.” 

    EEOC COMMISSIONER RESPONDS TO SUPREME COURT RULING AGAINST RACE-BASED COLLEGE ADMISSIONS

    President Donald Trump signed a bevy of executive actions and orders on Jan. 20, 2025, after he was sworn in as the nation’s 47th president, including ones related to DEI.  (JIM WATSON/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

    Lucas echoed Trump’s views on DEI programs within the federal government and beyond in her statement Tuesday, championing that the nation “must reject the twin lies of identity politics.”

    TRUMP PRAISED FOR EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON BORDER, DEI, ENERGY: ‘COMMON SENSE DAY IN AMERICA’

    “Our employment civil rights laws are a matter of individual rights,” Lucas said. “We must reject the twin lies of identity politics: that justice is measured by group outcomes and that civil rights exist solely to remedy harms against certain groups.” 

    “The Biden Administration forced illegal and immoral discrimination programs, going by the name ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion,’” Trump’s executive order on ending “radical and wasteful” DEI programs states.  (Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images)

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    “I intend to dispel the notion that only the ‘right sort of’ charging party is welcome through our doors and to reinforce instead the fundamental belief enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and our civil rights laws—that all people are ‘created equal.’ I am committed to ensuring equal justice under the law and to focusing on equal opportunity, merit, and colorblind equality.” 



    In a move aimed at combating unlawful discrimination in the workplace, President Trump has appointed a new acting chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) who has vowed to root out DEI-motivated discrimination.

    The EEOC is responsible for enforcing federal laws that prohibit discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, and genetic information in the workplace. However, there has been a growing concern about discrimination based on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in recent years.

    The new acting chair of the EEOC, appointed by President Trump, has promised to prioritize investigating and prosecuting cases of unlawful DEI-motivated discrimination. This includes discrimination against employees who advocate for diversity and inclusion in the workplace, as well as discrimination against employees based on their race, gender, or other protected characteristics.

    The acting chair has stated that they will work closely with employers to ensure that they are in compliance with federal anti-discrimination laws and will take swift action against those who engage in unlawful discrimination. They have also emphasized the importance of creating a workplace culture that is inclusive and welcoming to all employees, regardless of their background or beliefs.

    With the new acting chair at the helm, the EEOC is poised to take a strong stance against unlawful DEI-motivated discrimination in the workplace. Employers should be on notice that discriminatory practices will not be tolerated, and that the EEOC will take action to protect the rights of all employees.

    Tags:

    1. DEI discrimination
    2. Workplace discrimination
    3. Trump EEOC chair
    4. Unlawful discrimination
    5. EEOC enforcement
    6. Diversity, equity, and inclusion
    7. Workplace equality
    8. Trump administration
    9. EEOC initiatives
    10. Employment discrimination

    #Unlawful #DEImotivated #discrimination #workplace #rooted #Trumps #acting #EEOC #chair

  • AI, Race, and Discrimination: Confronting Racial Bias in Artificial Intelligence

    AI, Race, and Discrimination: Confronting Racial Bias in Artificial Intelligence


    Price: $13.99
    (as of Dec 24,2024 02:39:56 UTC – Details)




    ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CHCP31ND
    Publisher ‏ : ‎ Independently published (September 5, 2023)
    Language ‏ : ‎ English
    Paperback ‏ : ‎ 207 pages
    ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 979-8860427938
    Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.35 pounds
    Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 8.5 x 0.47 x 11 inches


    Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize industries, improve efficiency, and enhance our daily lives. However, as AI systems become more prevalent in society, it is becoming increasingly evident that they are not immune to biases and discrimination, particularly when it comes to race.

    There have been numerous instances where AI algorithms have exhibited racial bias, whether it be in facial recognition technology, hiring practices, or predictive policing. These biases can have harmful consequences, perpetuating systemic racism and further marginalizing already vulnerable communities.

    As we continue to integrate AI into various aspects of our lives, it is crucial that we address and confront racial bias in these systems. This includes ensuring that AI algorithms are trained on diverse and representative data sets, implementing transparency and accountability measures, and actively working to mitigate bias in the development and deployment of AI technologies.

    It is also important for policymakers, researchers, and industry leaders to collaborate and work together to create standards and guidelines for ethical AI development. By actively confronting racial bias in AI, we can strive towards a more equitable and inclusive future where technology serves all individuals, regardless of race or background.
    #Race #Discrimination #Confronting #Racial #Bias #Artificial #Intelligence

Chat Icon