Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: DONALD
A standoff is brewing between Donald Trump and New York
President Donald Trump has made it clear he plans to repeal the policies of the Biden administration and assert his own vision for New York. Standing in his way are city and state politicians, who retain their own authority to block Trump’s efforts.
The battle begins with congestion pricing and deportations. “I will TERMINATE Congestion Pricing in my FIRST WEEK back in Office!!!” Trump wrote on Truth Social in May. To do so, he will have to get around Gov. Kathy Hochul, who remains committed to the congestion toll.
Trump’s plans for mass deportations in New York City will have to overcome its status as a sanctuary city. “Sanctuary jurisdictions aren’t going to stop what we’re going to do,” Thomas D. Homan, Trump’s new border czar, said in an interview with NewsNation in December.
In recent weeks, tensions have been on the rise between former President Donald Trump and the state of New York. The latest escalation comes as Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. has convened a grand jury to investigate Trump’s business dealings.The grand jury is expected to hear evidence and potentially bring criminal charges against Trump or members of his organization. This move has not gone unnoticed by the former president, who has been vocal in his criticism of the investigation, calling it a “witch hunt” and a politically motivated attack.
Trump, who has long called New York City his home and base of operations, has been at odds with the state’s political establishment for years. From clashes with Governor Andrew Cuomo to legal battles with Attorney General Letitia James, Trump has not shied away from taking on his home state.
As the standoff between Trump and New York continues to escalate, it remains to be seen how this high-stakes confrontation will play out. Will Trump be able to evade legal consequences, or will the long arm of the law finally catch up with him? Only time will tell. Stay tuned for updates as this story unfolds.
Tags:
- Donald Trump
- New York
- political standoff
- current events
- President Trump
- New York politics
- US politics
- Trump administration
- conflict in New York
- political tensions
#standoff #brewing #Donald #Trump #York
Gulf of Mexico or Gulf of America? Google Maps and contentious geography | Donald Trump News
United States President Donald Trump’s executive orders have crept into the realm of digital cartography. Google announced on Monday that its online mapping platform, Google Maps, will change the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America for users in the US.
Additionally, Google Maps will change the name of North America’s tallest peak, Mount Denali, to Mount McKinley. These changes will be reflected on the platform once they are made officially by the US government.
Here’s how Google has dealt with places with disputed names in the past, and how the new change will work:
What exactly will change on Google Maps?
- The name of the Gulf of Mexico will change to Gulf of America for users who are within the US.
- It will remain Gulf of Mexico for users within Mexico.
- Google Maps will display both Gulf of Mexico and Gulf of America to users who are neither in the US nor in Mexico.
- The name of Mount Denali will be changed to Mount McKinley for Google Maps users across the world.
How did we get here?
On the day of his inauguration on January 20, Trump signed 26 executive orders. One of these orders renames the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, and Mount Denali to Mount McKinley.
The Gulf of Mexico is a water body, bound by Cuba, eastern states in Mexico: Tamaulipas, Veracruz, Tabasco, Campeche, Yucatan and Quintana Roo; and states on the Gulf Coast of the United States: Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida.
The snow-capped Mount Denali in Alaska is the highest mountain in North America at an elevation of 6,190 metres (20,308 feet).
The Gulf of Mexico has had its name for about 400 years. In his book, The Principall Navigations, Voiages and Discoveries of the English Nation, published in 1589, English geographer Richard Hakluyt calls the water body “Gulfe of Mexico”. In Mexico, the gulf is also called by its Spanish name, El Golfo de Mexico.
Trump can rename the Gulf of Mexico for his domestic audience, but the rest of the world does not have to go with that name change, since there are no international laws that decide what a common maritime space or a disputed territory is called universally.
Renaming Mount Denali is more straightforward since it is part of US territory. Trump wishes to rename the mountain Mount McKinley after former Republican William McKinley, who was president from 1897 to 1901, and never visited Alaska.
“Our nation’s tallest mountain, which has been called Denali for thousands of years, must continue to be known by the rightful name bestowed by Alaska’s Koyukon Athabascans, who have stewarded the land since time immemorial,” Lisa Murkowski, a Republican US senator from Alaska, posted on X as a response.
The mountain’s name was officially changed to Mount McKinley in 1917. In 2015, the name was changed back to Denali by former Democrat President Barack Obama.
Denali, in the Kuyokan Athabascan language, means “the tall one” or “the high one”. The Indigenous people of Alaska, as well as other residents of the state, prefer the name Denali.
When will Google Maps make the change?
The exact date is not known yet. Google will update the name on its map application when the US government officially makes the change.
“We have a longstanding practice of applying name changes when they have been updated in official government,” Google posted on X on Monday.
In the case of the US, the change will reflect on the application when the names are updated in the Geographic Names Information System (GNIS), the official database maintained by the US Geological Survey (USGS) which contains names of more than one million geographic sites in the US.
It is unclear when the names will be updated on the GNIS, but when Trump signed the January 20 executive order, he wanted the name change within 30 days, which would be February 19.
Why did Google Maps make the change?
“When official names vary between countries, Maps users see their official local name. Everyone in the rest of the world sees both names. That applies here too,” Google said in a post on X on Monday.
A 2008 Google Public Policy Blog post explains further: “For each difficult case, we gather a cross-functional group of Googlers including software engineers, product managers, GIS specialists, policy analysts, and geopolitical researchers. This process benefits from the local knowledge and experience of Googlers around the world.”
But there are also clear economic rationales that drive decisions of companies like Google, say experts.
Companies such as Google make maps “to support their business missions of search and advertising, so the decisions they make about what to put in their maps will ultimately be the decisions that support those goals,” Sterling Quinn, an associate professor at the department of geography in Central Washington University, told Al Jazeera.
Google’s approach, he said, is to “try to make as few customers angry as possible”, either by adding customisations based on region or by introducing ambiguity by either removing names of places or adding multiple names.
“Corporate mapping decisions in political disputes can depend on the economic and political power of the involved parties. I view Google’s ‘Gulf of America’ change as more of a sign that they want to maintain uninterrupted business, rather than a sign that they agree with Trump’s change,” Quinn added.
Has this happened before?
Yes, Google Maps displays different names for certain places, depending on who’s looking.
Kashmir
Both India and Pakistan control parts of Kashmir and claim all of the territory of the mountainous region. In 2019, India revoked the semi-autonomous status of Indian-administered Kashmir, cleaving it into two regions – Jammu and Kashmir in the west and Ladakh in the east.
If you are in India, Jammu and Kashmir, as well as Ladakh appear to be a part of India on Google Maps, with a solid black line around Kashmir. If you are in another country, including Pakistan, Google Maps outlines Jammu and Kashmir, as well as Ladakh, with a black dashed line.
Persian Gulf or Arabian Gulf
What Iran calls the Persian Gulf is called the Arabian Gulf by Arab nations. The water body is bound by Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
If you are in Iran, Google Maps labels the water body as the Persian Gulf. If you are in an Arab country that has a coast on the gulf, such as Qatar, Google Maps will call it the Arabian Gulf. If you are in any other country that does not have a coast on the gulf, Google Maps labels the water body “Persian Gulf (Arabian Gulf)”.
Sea of Japan or East Sea
The sea that is bound by Japan and the Korean Peninsula is called the Sea of Japan by Japan, while both North and South Korea call it the East Sea.
If you are in Japan, Google Maps labels it the Sea of Japan. In South Korea, it appears as the East Sea. Outside of Japan and South Korea, it appears as “Sea of Japan (East Sea)”.
How have people reacted to the recent Google Maps announcement?
The Google Maps announcement about the upcoming changes related to the Gulf of Mexico prompted a mixed bag of responses online. On X, while many welcomed the move, some posted about shifting to other mapping platforms such as Apple Maps.
When it does, I will delete google and use DuckDuckGo and Apple maps.
— UncleTummy No Blue checkmark but voting Blue (@UncleTummyTX) January 29, 2025
However, in November 2019, the lower house of the Russian parliament announced that Apple Maps would display Crimea as part of Russia when viewed from Russia. In 2014, Russia annexed Crimea in an internationally condemned move.
Outside Russia, Crimea is clearly marked as Ukrainian territory on Apple Maps.
Currently, on Google Maps, there is a black dashed line between Ukraine and Crimea, as well as between Ukraine and Russia, whether the map is viewed from Ukraine, Russia or another country.
Al Jazeera reached out to Apple to ask whether Apple Maps will be changing the names of the Gulf of Mexico or Mount Denali, but did not receive a response.
Are maps objective?
Not really.
“Many people want to treat maps like objective documents, but maps are a product of the culture and values of the people that produce them,” Quinn, the geography professor, said.
He explained that names of places have always been “fluid, contested, and political”.
“Ultimately, people who use the names will be the ones who decide what they are,” he said, adding that names of geographical sites that people use in conversations might not always be reflected in institutionally produced maps.
“That being said, a widely-used map like Google Maps has a lot of potential to influence the way that people perceive the world.”
In recent years, there has been a growing debate over the name of the body of water located off the southern coast of the United States. While traditionally referred to as the Gulf of Mexico, some have argued that it should be called the Gulf of America instead.This contentious issue has even made its way onto Google Maps, where users have noticed that the body of water is labeled as both the Gulf of Mexico and the Gulf of America depending on where you are viewing the map from. This discrepancy has sparked further debate among internet users and scholars alike.
One of the most vocal proponents of the name change is former President Donald Trump, who has argued that calling it the Gulf of America would be more patriotic and in line with his “America First” agenda. However, many have pushed back against this idea, citing the long-standing historical and cultural significance of the name Gulf of Mexico.
Ultimately, the decision of what to call this body of water may seem trivial to some, but it speaks to larger questions of national identity and sovereignty. As the debate continues to unfold, it will be interesting to see how Google Maps and other digital platforms navigate this contentious geography.
Tags:
- Gulf of Mexico vs Gulf of America
- Google Maps geography
- Donald Trump news
- Gulf of Mexico boundaries
- Controversial geography debates
- Gulf of Mexico history
- Donald Trump foreign policy
- Gulf of America disputes
- Google Maps controversy
- Gulf of Mexico oil industry
#Gulf #Mexico #Gulf #America #Google #Maps #contentious #geography #Donald #Trump #News
Senate confirms Lee Zeldin as Donald Trump’s EPA administrator
The Senate voted Wednesday to confirm former congressman Lee Zeldin as President Donald Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency administrator.
Zeldin, who is expected to pursue a deregulation push at the EPA, was confirmed by a vote of 56 to 42.
Trump wants to rollback environmental rules, declaring when he announced Zeldin as his choice for EPA administrator that he would “ensure fair and swift deregulatory decisions that will be enacted in a way to unleash the power of American businesses.”
“We must ensure we are protecting the environment while also protecting our economy,” Zeldin said at his confirmation hearing.
Zeldin, 44, is an attorney and former state senator from Long Island, New York. He spent four years in the Army on active duty, deployed to Iraq and still serves as a lieutenant colonel in the Army Reserve. Elected to Congress in 2014, he served eight years and lost a race for governor of New York in 2022.
Trump has dismissed concerns about climate change. He campaigned heavily against rules promoting electric vehicles and immediately removed the United States from the Paris Agreement on climate after taking office.
Zeldin said at his confirmation hearing that he believes climate change is real, but he has criticized efforts to limit emissions that contribute to warming temperatures. He advocated for lifting New York’s ban on fracking for natural gas.
Zeldin is among a number of Trump Cabinet picks who have faced questions about experience. He doesn’t have a significant public profile on environmental issues, but has been a staunch supporter of the president, voting against certifying the 2020 election results after Trump lost.
Today, the Senate has confirmed Lee Zeldin as the new Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) administrator under former President Donald Trump. This decision comes after a rigorous confirmation process that saw Zeldin face tough questioning from lawmakers on his environmental policies and priorities.Zeldin, a staunch supporter of Trump’s deregulatory agenda, has promised to roll back many of the Obama-era environmental regulations that he believes have stifled economic growth. Critics of Zeldin have raised concerns about his close ties to the fossil fuel industry and his skepticism of climate change science.
As the new head of the EPA, Zeldin will play a crucial role in shaping the country’s environmental policies and regulations. It remains to be seen how he will balance the need for economic growth with the imperative to protect our planet for future generations.
Stay tuned for updates on Zeldin’s agenda and the impact of his leadership on our environment.
Tags:
- Lee Zeldin
- Donald Trump
- EPA administrator
- Senate confirmation
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Lee Zeldin EPA
- Lee Zeldin Senate confirmation
- Trump administration
- Environmental policy
- Government appointments
#Senate #confirms #Lee #Zeldin #Donald #Trumps #EPA #administrator
India reviews Donald Trump’s new trade policy
New Delhi: India is conducting a legal review of US President Donald Trump’s America First Trade Policy to gauge its implications on the country’s trade agenda.The review assumes significance with Trump asking Prime Minister Narendra Modi to move towards a fair bilateral trading relationship and buy more America-made security equipment. Modi is likely to visit the US next month.
The US' trade deficit with India was above $35 billion in FY24.Review WTO Agreements
It is India's top trading partner with New Delhi exporting goods worth $77.5 billion in FY24.Trump has said that high-tariff countries such as India, China, and Brazil "harm" America and that Washington would impose taxes on other countries to bring money into the US. He also threatened the BRICS bloc of 100% tariffs if it moves forward with plans to replace the US dollar.As per the America First Trade Policy, the US will "review the impact of all trade agreements including the WTO on government procurement... to ensure that such agreements are being implemented in a manner that favours domestic workers and manufacturers, not foreign nations".
"The US' policy of becoming a manufacturing hub is similar to India's Atmanirbhar Bharat. India will have to take a calibrated approach as the US has said earlier that its exporters encounter tariff and non-tariff barriers in the country," said a Delhi-based trade expert.
[ad_2]
India reviews Donald Trump's new trade policy: A closer look at the implications Donald Trump's new trade policy has been met with mixed reactions around the world, and India is no exception. The Indian government has expressed concerns about the potential impact of the policy on its economy and trade relations with the United States. One of the key points of contention is the imposition of tariffs on Indian exports to the US. India is one of the largest exporters of goods to the US, and any increase in tariffs could have a significant impact on its economy. The Indian government has called for dialogue with the US to address these concerns and find a mutually beneficial solution. Additionally, India is wary of the potential for a trade war between the US and other countries, including China. A trade war could have far-reaching consequences for the global economy, and India is keen to avoid being caught in the crossfire. Overall, India is closely monitoring the situation and is working to ensure that its interests are protected in the face of changing trade policies. The government is committed to engaging with the US and other countries to find solutions that benefit all parties involved. Stay tuned for more updates on India's response to Donald Trump's new trade policy.
Tags:
India trade policy, Donald Trump, trade reviews, international trade, economic policy, India economy, trade agreements, trade relations, global trade, trade policy analysis
#India #reviews #Donald #Trumps #trade #policyIran rethinks confrontation with Donald Trump
For years, a US flag was painted on the floor of Iran’s presidential compound, strategically located so that visitors would trample over the Stars and Stripes on their way in.
Shortly before Donald Trump’s inauguration, however, the flag was quietly removed. There was no official explanation from Iranian officials. But the move captured a quiet shift in Tehran’s thinking, in what is shaping up to be its most consequential year since the 1980s Iran-Iraq war: with the country at its most vulnerable point in years, officials hope they can avoid confrontation and even strike a deal with the new president.
The return of their bête noire to the White House is happening just as Iran’s long nuclear stand-off with the west comes to a head. It also follows a year of conflict that has changed the power dynamics in the Middle East at Tehran’s expense, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu emboldened by a string of battlefield gains that dealt the Islamic republic and its regional proxies devastating blows.
Israel, which traded two rounds of tit-for-tat strikes with Iran last year, claims to have destroyed much of its air defences; Tehran’s main proxy, the Lebanese movement Hizbollah, has been debilitated; and the toppling of the Assad regime in Syria has robbed it of a key ally. With this in mind, analysts say Iran can ill-afford to antagonise Trump and risk more military conflict with Israel and even the US.
“It is a very critical year, largely because the strategic context for Iran has changed drastically,” said Vali Nasr, a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. “What Iran has lost is a way of managing Israel and . . . its hand is weaker with the Europeans and the Americans.”
The expectation is that Trump, who in his first term abandoned the 2015 nuclear deal Tehran signed with world powers and ramped up sanctions in a “maximum pressure” campaign, will return to his hardline policies.
But there are also hints he may be willing to bargain. Trump has delegated his Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff to explore whether diplomatic accommodation with Iran is possible, saying last week that “it would really be nice if [tensions over Iran’s nuclear programme] could be worked out”.
Western diplomats say the government of reformist President Masoud Pezeshkian has for weeks signalled more willingness to agree to a negotiated settlement to secure relief and ease domestic economic pressure, but also because of Iran’s weakened position and desire to avoid military confrontation with the US and Israel.
But they warn that, if that fails, Iran is on a collision course with the west. European powers that opposed Trump’s maximum pressure during his first term have become more angry with Iran’s behaviour, including the continued expansion of its nuclear activity, its arms sales to Russia and its alleged targeting of citizens in the west.
With Iran enriching uranium close to weapons-grade level — and closer than it has ever been to having the capacity to produce nuclear bombs — diplomats say they want action not words.
The 2015 accord’s “sunset clauses” are set to expire in October, which will lift restrictions on Iran’s nuclear activities and in effect signal the termination of the moribund agreement.
As that date nears, a risk for Iran is that western powers trigger the so-called snapback process that would lead to the reimposition of UN sanctions and further international isolation if there is no alternative deal.
Inside Iran, reformists have begun public debates to pressure Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader, and the elite Revolutionary Guard to negotiate, arguing that this may be the regime’s last chance to avert a crisis.
Pezeshkian “has the opportunity to take significant steps for Iran”, said Hossein Marashi, a senior reformist politician, during a speech this month. “His first mission should be a new chapter in foreign policy. We no longer hold leverage in Lebanon, Syria or Iraq.”
Iranian analysts said, however, that Tehran does not want to be seen to negotiate out of desperation.
“While we resist US pressure, we will also signal a willingness to negotiate,” said a relative of Khamenei. “Iran is working to minimise actions that might provoke Washington, even if no agreement is eventually reached.”
The relative of Khamenei acknowledged that Israel’s attacks on Iran and the so-called “axis of resistance” of Tehran-backed militant groups, including Hizbollah and Hamas, had led Iranian leaders to reassess their perception of the republic’s power in the Middle East.
But he added that Tehran retains tools “to alter the battlefield”, without elaborating: “The Islamic republic has suffered blows, but there will be no strategic U-turns in its domestic and foreign policies.”
“The Iranians don’t see themselves as weak in the way in which they’re being portrayed. They have inherent weaknesses, there’s no question about it,” Nasr said. “But they estimate that there are constraints on Trump if he doesn’t pursue the diplomatic path, and that the risks are quite high for a military conflict that the US cannot then control.”
When Trump implemented his “maximum pressure” strategy against Iran during his first term, Iranian forces were blamed for sabotage attacks on tankers in the Gulf and a missile and drone strike in 2019 on Saudi oil infrastructure.
But Trump also displayed his unpredictability. After initially indicating that he was not willing to use military action, he in 2020 ordered the assassination of Qassem Soleimani, Iran’s most powerful commander, pushing the foes briefly to the brink of war.
Some experts said the blows to the axis, which have diminished Iran’s regional influence, could mean Tehran would be more willing to strike a deal with Trump to seek security guarantees that it would not be attacked by Israel.
Sanam Vakil, director of the Middle East programme at Chatham House, said Tehran needed to entice Trump into a deal quickly if it was to avoid more US “maximum pressure” and the threat of further Israeli strikes.
“Without offering something bigger, they risk a third round of strikes from Israel that will be supported by this US administration,” she said. “What’s at stake is the viability of the regime. The economic viability of the regime and their ability to rehabilitate themselves and build back legitimacy.”
In recent days, there have been signs that Iran may be reconsidering its confrontational approach towards Donald Trump and the United States. This shift in strategy comes as tensions between the two countries have reached new heights, with the U.S. recently deploying additional troops to the region and Iran making threats of retaliation.One of the key indicators of this potential shift in Iran’s stance is the recent statement by Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, who expressed a willingness to hold talks with the U.S. under the right conditions. This represents a departure from Iran’s previous refusal to engage in negotiations with the Trump administration, which has imposed harsh sanctions on the country and withdrawn from the Iran nuclear deal.
Additionally, there have been reports of backchannel communications between Iran and the U.S., suggesting that both sides may be open to finding a diplomatic solution to their differences. This marks a significant change from the rhetoric of the past, which has often been marked by threats and provocations.
While it remains to be seen whether this apparent shift in Iran’s approach will lead to a de-escalation of tensions with the U.S., it is a positive development that could potentially pave the way for a peaceful resolution to the current crisis. As both countries continue to navigate the complexities of their relationship, the world will be watching closely to see how this situation unfolds.
Tags:
- Iran Trump relations
- Iran-US tensions
- Diplomatic relations with Iran
- Iran foreign policy
- Iran political strategy
- President Trump foreign policy
- Middle East politics
- Iran nuclear deal
- Iran diplomacy
- US-Iran conflict resolution
#Iran #rethinks #confrontation #Donald #Trump
Meet Kerry Kennedy, RFK Jr’s sister, who opposes him and Donald Trump: from human-rights activism to a troubled marriage to ex-New York governor Andrew Cuomo … and supporting her demisexual daughter
Kerry Kennedy believes that despite her fundamental political differences with her brother, Robert F. Kennedy Jr, they can “still find ways of loving each other”, she said in an interview with CNN.According to The Hill, there has been widespread speculation that US President Donald Trump has picked RFK Jr to be Health Secretary in his new administration.The rumours have caused widespread alarm. RFK Jr has been known to make false claims about vaccines, plus other erroneous, health-related comments, such as how chemical exposure in water can lead to sexual dysphoria, according to CNN.
Kerry, a Democrat who openly supported Kamala Harris and rallied her siblings to oppose her Trump-supporting brother in the presidential election, told CNN that she did not trust him to be in charge of health in the United States.Meet Kerry, the Kennedy who isn’t afraid to speak out about the other Kennedy.
Kerry Kennedy is a human-rights activist
Kerry is president of the Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights organisation, which focuses on child labour, women’s rights, disappearances and indigenous land rights, according to its website. It also states that Kerry has led “hundreds of human rights” delegations in support of these causes. Kerry is the chair of the Amnesty International USA Leadership Council and has also served on the boards of directors for the United States Institute of Peace; Human Rights First; and Laureates and Leaders, her biography says.
She’s Kennedy royalty
Kerry, 65, is the seventh of Ethel and Robert F. Kennedy’s 11 children. Robert was the brother of John F. Kennedy, the US president assassinated in 1963. Less than five years later Robert was also gunned down. He was campaigning to be president when he was shot and killed.
Kerry Kennedy, the seventh child of Robert F. Kennedy and Ethel Kennedy, has been making headlines for her outspoken opposition to both her brother, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and former President Donald Trump.Kennedy, who is well-known for her human-rights activism and work with the Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights organization, has been critical of her brother’s anti-vaccine stance and promotion of conspiracy theories. In a recent interview, she expressed her disappointment in her brother’s beliefs and the harm they are causing to public health.
But Kennedy’s turbulent personal life has also been a topic of conversation. Her marriage to ex-New York governor Andrew Cuomo ended in a highly-publicized divorce, with rumors of infidelity and political ambitions swirling around the couple. Despite this, Kennedy has remained dedicated to her work and her family, including her daughter Mariah, who recently came out as demisexual.
Kennedy has been a vocal supporter of her daughter and the LGBTQ+ community, using her platform to advocate for acceptance and understanding. In a world filled with division and hate, Kerry Kennedy stands as a beacon of hope and compassion, fighting for justice and equality for all.
Tags:
- Kerry Kennedy
- RFK Jr’s sister
- Human rights activism
- Troubled marriage
- Andrew Cuomo
- Demisexual daughter
- Political family drama
- Kennedy family
- Anti-Trump activism
- Progressive politics
#Meet #Kerry #Kennedy #RFK #Jrs #sister #opposes #Donald #Trump #humanrights #activism #troubled #marriage #exNew #York #governor #Andrew #Cuomo #supporting #demisexual #daughter
A shale boom is not Donald Trump’s gift to give
Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free
Your guide to what the 2024 US election means for Washington and the world
Cutting red tape, unleashing, debottlenecking — these are all great business-friendly policies. They work wonders on industries previously fettered by regulation. But there is little evidence that this has been the case for US fossil fuels. That suggests President Donald Trump’s efforts to expedite oil and gas projects will deliver a trickle, not a flood.
Oil producers have been “drill, baby, drilling” for quite some time. In 2024, US oil production averaged 13.2mn barrels a day, making it the largest oil producer in the world. That’s two-and-a-half times what the country was producing in 2008. The supply of US gas, too, has roughly doubled during that period.
True, this breakneck pace cannot continue forever. The industry will add an extra 270,000 barrels a day on average in 2025 and 2026, according to consultancy Argus Media, roughly a quarter of what it squeezed out in 2023. But that largely reflects the fact that a lot of the best acreage has already been exploited.
Trumpian policies, like encouraging drilling in US coastal waters, will open up new territories. Even if they contain exploitable resources, though, the time it takes to develop a project extends beyond the length of a single four-year presidential term. This is no short-term fix.
Unfortunately for Trump, what inhibits the flow of oil is not red tape, but low prices. Producing oil from US shale formations is relatively expensive. Companies need prices to be somewhere between $60 and $80 a barrel if they want to cover all their costs and pay dividends, estimates Christopher Wheaton at Stifel.
Shale is also highly sensitive to commodity price moves because, unlike traditional projects in which much of the cost is sunk upfront, maintaining shale output requires constant spending. By way of example, the record low price for US natural gas in 2024 has already caused production to nudge lower.
That rather limits Trump’s room for manoeuvre, at least with oil. Gas may be a bit more responsive, given there is some hope that strong demand, not least from data centres, and the resumption of LNG export permitting might raise domestic prices. That would help producers justify more supply.
As it stands, the oil market is hardly undersupplied. A spluttering China translates into weak demand. Opec+, which wants to see prices stay high, is sufficiently worried that it is actively holding back supply. That means that any increase in US oil production is likely to push down prices and thus be shortlived. The only thing gushing in the oil patch is rhetoric.
The recent increase in shale oil and gas production in the United States has been touted as a major success of the Trump administration’s energy policies. However, it is important to recognize that this shale boom is not solely the result of Donald Trump’s actions, and it is not his gift to give.The shale boom has been driven by a combination of technological advancements, market forces, and the hard work of countless individuals in the energy industry. Hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” has revolutionized the extraction of oil and gas from shale formations, making previously inaccessible reserves economically viable.
Furthermore, the shale boom is a result of private sector investment and innovation, not government intervention. While the Trump administration has rolled back regulations and opened up federal lands for drilling, the majority of shale development has occurred on private lands and was already well underway before Trump took office.
It is important to recognize that the shale boom is not a gift from any one individual or administration. It is the result of a complex interplay of factors that have come together to create a thriving industry. While Trump may claim credit for the increase in shale production, it is important to remember that this boom is not his to give – it is a product of the hard work and ingenuity of the American energy sector.
Tags:
shale boom, Donald Trump, US economy, energy industry, fracking, oil production, natural gas, energy policy, economic growth
#shale #boom #Donald #Trumps #gift #giveBigmama’s – Paperback By Crews, Donald – VERY GOOD
Bigmama’s – Paperback By Crews, Donald – VERY GOOD
Price : 3.77
Ends on : N/A
View on eBay
Looking for a heartwarming and captivating read? Look no further than “Bigmama’s” by Donald Crews. This paperback edition is in very good condition and is sure to transport you to a world filled with love, family, and nostalgia. Don’t miss out on this wonderful book – pick up your copy today! #Bigmamas #DonaldCrews #Paperback #VeryGoodCondition
#Bigmamas #Paperback #Crews #Donald #GOOD,ages 3+