Tag: droves

  • Local residents come out in droves to support rejection of UNC cogeneration permit


    COMMUNITY NEWS; ENVIRONMENT

    By Adam Powell
    Correspondent

    CHAPEL HILLOn the evening of Thursday, Jan. 17, the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality’s Division of Air Quality (NCDEQ) held a meeting at Chapel Hill’s Town Hall for public comments about a proposed change at the UNC-Chapel Hill cogeneration facility, located at 575 W. Cameron Avenue.

    UNC proposes switching from burning coal and natural gas to a combination of coal, natural gas, and engineered pellets at the cogeneration facility. Those pellets contain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (also known as PFAS), requiring UNC to conduct a series of tests and samplings to ensure that the facility does not emit more than 1.2 pounds of PFAS substances per year.

    According to a press release prior to the meeting, NCDEQ indicated that PFAS pellets, while not considered solid waste, are expected to increase emissions of nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide into the local atmosphere while reducing emissions of particulate matter and sulfur dioxide.

    More than 50 public speakers attended the session, and practically all opposed the proposed changes at the cogeneration facility.

    The list of speakers included State Senator Graig Meyer, who represents Orange, Caswell, and Person Counties in Senate District 23, Chapel Hill Town Council members Melissa McCullough and Camille Berry, former Town Council member Maria Palmer, local journalist Kirk Ross, and a variety of local residents, UNC students, and environmental experts. There were individuals with backgrounds in the Sierra Club, the Southern Environmental Law Center, Haw River Assembly, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), among many others.

    State Senator explains long-term planning process

    In his introductory comments, State Senator Meyer expressed to the spectators his gratitude for their attendance while also explaining the many months of planning and preparation during which local officials and UNC leaders have been collaborating together to get the UNC cogeneration facility on the other side of exclusive fossil fuels usage.

    “If you haven’t heard about it yet, we have already been for a year in a very important planning process where all of our local government units, as well as many community organizations and the university, have been in a joint-planning process for what happens as the university transitions away from coal and burnable fuels and shifts to a cleaner energy mix,” said Meyer. “And what then happens to the rail line that connects the cogeneration facility through the rest of our community? And how do we transform that rail line into an opportunity for non-automotive transportation, for connection to new housing opportunities, for economic development opportunities? We’ve had an amazing process.”

    Council members, community speakers implore NCDEQ to reject proposal

    Town Council Member McCullough, who worked for three decades as an environmental scientist (now retired) at the United States Environmental Protection Agency and a community sustainability expert, spoke about the challenges the cogeneration facility has created for local residents in the form of pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.

    “This is an emboldened problem,” stated McCullough. “The surrounding neighborhoods have had to breathe the pollution from this plant since decades before there were even air pollution laws. This is an environmental justice issue of the historically black neighborhoods where the people who built and served our university have lived for generations.”

    “UNC is at a turning point that mirrors the rest of the world: how to assure necessary heat and power into a future where coal is dirty, finite, and increasingly expensive,” continued McCullough. “Fracked gas is not better for the climate and renewable options aren’t always easy to retrofit into complex existing systems. We all know this is not easy, but not having an easy answer doesn’t justify this technological detour that will only delay actually finding a good solution. The requested permit would allow burning pellets. Definitely the existing plant is a known (with coal and natural gas burning) but controlled problem. But this permit application offers no way to reliably estimate the resulting pollution or the health and environmental impacts to the surrounding community.

    “The emissions of PFAS would be unquantified and uncontrolled. Emissions of other toxic air pollutants will increase and affect the health of the soil community, and there would still be waste materials, but now of unknown composition. I urge the DEQ to reject this permit application, or UNC to withdraw it, because we are not assured that the marginal benefits of this proposal are worth the potential impacts that the university wants (in order) to be a good neighbor and global citizen. They need to find permanent, clean, and sustainable solutions.”

    Council Member Berry spoke on behalf of a neighbor who lives approximately 100 yards from the cogeneration plant, iterating the neighbor’s concerns about PFAS emissions. She decried the one-year trial period’s expense for sampling and testing PFAS emissions, while also expressing displeasure that the facility would still burn coal and natural gas, though in smaller quantities.

    “North Carolina communities and organizations like OWASA are spending millions to count PFAS and slow chemicals. It is self-defeating to add more PFAS to the environment,” said Berry. “We don’t know how the various components of the pellets might be altered from incineration. The composition of the pellets themselves can vary.”

    “The cogen plant creates 10,000 tons of coal ash annually,” added Berry. “In response to environmental injustice and economic crisis, we owe it to ourselves to course-correct by installing existing and widely available non-polluting energy sources. The university should lead in this regard instead of putting forward feckless half-measures. The Town Council and mayor (past and present) have done a lot to establish that Chapel Hill is more than just the university’s location. However, improving the use of these pellets or continuing to burn gas or toxic coal will blow that effort and show that the university has more impact in the lives of citizens than our elected government.”

    Local journalist suggests UNC and NCDEQ aren’t prepared for yearlong testing

    “I think the DEQ should take a step back,” stated Ross. “The university should pursue other alternatives. My main concern is that this permit allows the cogen plant to become an incinerator for the plastic fiber and paper registries. Some people say burning this stuff is a good idea, but it’s hard to believe that any of them would advocate setting up shop in our downtown, or any downtown.”

    Haw River Keeper brings up potential impacts to local air, water supplies

    Emily Sutton, Executive Director and Haw River Keeper at the Haw River Assembly has actively supported environmentally friendly initiatives throughout the local region. For several years, she and her colleagues successfully fought the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) expansion into adjacent Alamance County. In January 2024, MVP Southgate announced that it would not extend its pipeline into Alamance County. Sutton is an expert in water quality and has made numerous points regarding potential impacts on local water and air.

    “Our mission is to protect the Haw River and Jordan Lake, but I’m also here speaking on behalf of our communities who would be impacted by this permit if approved,” said Sutton. “NCDEQ has acknowledged the dangers of burning coal and has even committed to phase out coal completely by 2020. Not only has that promise been broken, but this permit modification continues to allow for coal burning, adding new threats. Those new threats include volatile organic chemicals, lead, benzene, acronyms, and PFAS. This proposal would allow unknown levels of unknown toxins to be released into the air and into the lungs of our communities. Conversion has stated that these pellets may contain a wide range of anywhere between 15 to 49% plastic. The contents of these pellets pose unknown risks to North Carolinians.

    “We know that what goes up in the air stacks comes down into our drinking water supplies,” added Sutton. “North Carolina has received international attention for our contaminated water crisis due to toxic PFAS discharges into surface water. But these toxins are not only getting in the water supplies from industrial wastewater discharges.”

    Former Council member suggests permit approval will harm local children

    Palmer, who founded the first Spanish-language church in Chapel Hill in the 1990s, mentioned the large number of her congregation members who work at UNC and her concerns about how the approval of the permit for PFAS usage would potentially affect air quality for children and future generations.

    “I’m here as a member of our community to ask you to deny this permit. Many of the people in the church that founded it worked and still work at UNC in maintenance and housekeeping. On behalf of all our families, we want to ask you to deny this and not to allow UNC to conduct an experiment with the air we breathe without our consent. I don’t know who the administrators are who requested this permit. Are they not concerned for their own children, or do they not believe in Chapel Hill? Do they trust that extensive filters will keep them safe from exposure to poisonous chemicals? Now, for a community, we believe all people are God’s children, and that we should protect all of them, as well as the environment. We need to say no to risky experiments that harm any of our residents.

    “There is no doubt that burning trash, even with fancy names, is bad for God’s creation,” continued Palmer. “My church asks you to keep the faith with our community and deny this burning. I’m totally blown away by all the science that has been shared. They totally convinced me that this is scientifically wrong, but it’s also morally wrong.”

    NCDEQ continued its public comments period through Wednesday, January 23, prior to making a final decision on the proposed permit requested by UNC.


    Adam Powell is a reporter on local news and sports and an education communications professional. A 2001 graduate of UNC-Chapel Hill, Powell has served as managing editor of multiple local publications, including the Mebane Enterprise, News of Orange County and TarHeelIllustrated.com. The public information officer for Rockingham County Schools in Eden, N.C., Powell is the author of four books and lives in Mebane with his wife and two children. This reporter can be reached at: Info@TheLocal Reporter.press





    Local residents in the community have banded together to show their overwhelming support for the rejection of the University of North Carolina’s (UNC) cogeneration permit. In a recent public hearing, community members voiced their concerns about the potential environmental impacts of the cogeneration plant, which is set to be built on UNC’s campus.

    Residents expressed worries about air pollution, noise pollution, and the overall impact on the health and well-being of those living in the surrounding area. Many also raised concerns about the lack of transparency and community engagement in the decision-making process.

    Despite UNC’s claims that the cogeneration plant would be a more sustainable and efficient energy source for the campus, residents remain steadfast in their opposition. They have called for a thorough environmental impact assessment and more opportunities for public input before any decisions are made.

    The outpouring of support from local residents has been truly inspiring, demonstrating the power of community activism in standing up for environmental justice. As the fight against the cogeneration plant continues, residents are committed to ensuring that their voices are heard and that the health and well-being of their community are protected.

    Tags:

    • UNC cogeneration permit rejection
    • Local residents support rejection of UNC permit
    • UNC cogeneration opposition
    • Chapel Hill residents protest cogeneration permit
    • UNC cogeneration permit denied
    • Chapel Hill community rallies against cogeneration permit
    • UNC cogeneration permit controversy
    • Local activism against UNC cogeneration permit
    • Chapel Hill residents stand up against cogeneration permit
    • UNC cogeneration permit rejected by community

    #Local #residents #droves #support #rejection #UNC #cogeneration #permit

  • North Koreans die in droves even as Russia unleashes firepower on Ukraine | Russia-Ukraine war News

    North Koreans die in droves even as Russia unleashes firepower on Ukraine | Russia-Ukraine war News


    Ukrainian forces have killed or wounded more than 1,000 North Korean troops Russia has sent to fight them, according to Kyiv and officials in South Korea.

    “According to preliminary data, the number of killed and wounded North Korean soldiers in the Kursk region already exceeds 3,000 people,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in his evening address on December 23.

    South Korean intelligence put the North Korean dead and wounded at 1,100, and said the North was preparing to send more troops. North Korea sent 11,000 troops to fight in the Russian region of Kursk, which Ukraine counter-invaded in August.

    North Korean troops were evidently untrained in dealing with Ukrainian drones, which took a high toll. In one instance, Ukrainian drone operators recorded how a North Korean soldier accidentally shot his comrade as they tried to shoot down the drone that was filming them.

    They may have been trying to execute a tactic described in a notebook recovered from the body of a North Korean soldier.

    “When detecting a drone, you need to create a trio, where the one who lures the drone keeps a distance of seven metres, and those who shoot it, 10-12 metres,” it read. “If the one who is luring stands still, the drone will also stop its movement. At this moment, the one who is shooting will eliminate the drone.”

    Ukraine’s Special Operations Forces said on Telegram their 8th regiment had killed 77 North Koreans in Kursk and wounded 40 over three days, without specifying the location. A video collage released by the regiment showed drones bearing down on individual enemy troops. Their signal cuts out at point-blank range, indicating the moment when the drones detonate.

    Russian President Vladimir Putin has been embarrassed by the first capture of Russian land since World War II and had initially pledged to push Ukrainian forces out by October 1.

    As the deadline drew near, his spokesman changed the Kremlin position, saying Ukraine’s forces would be ejected “in a timely manner”.  Putin reinforced that vagueness in an annual news conference on December 19. “I cannot and do not want to name a specific date when they will be knocked out,” he said.

    Some analysts suggested this could indicate a change in the Kremlin’s priorities, but Russia also seemed to make a concerted effort to improve its tactics on Christmas Eve.

    Oleg Chaus, a Ukrainian sergeant fighting in Kursk, said that whereas for the past month, the Russian assaults were “chaotic” and “disorganised”, three units attacked in an organised manner and with air support on December 24.

    “All the servicemen of these three groups had very high-quality ammunition. Each of them had disposable grenade launchers, they had night vision devices, they had small assault backpacks with them,” said the sergeant of Ukraine’s 17th Heavy Mechanised Brigade. “If one of those three groups had not been destroyed, they would have continued moving.”

    It appeared that these units included North Korean troops.

    Russia creeps forward in Donetsk

    Ukraine’s other hot front – its eastern region of Donetsk – saw intensified fighting during the Christmas holiday.

    Russia launched 248 assaults on Ukrainian positions on December 24, said Ukraine’s general staff, an unusually high number, followed by more than 200 assaults on Christmas day.

    During this time, geolocated footage suggested Russian forces broke through to the western part of the city of Kurakhove, which they had first entered in late October, completing its conquest.

    Anastasia Bobovnikova, spokesperson for Luhansk Technical University, said fierce battles were also ongoing for the Central Mine in the city of Toretsk.

    The most intense fighting, however, appeared to take place around the town of Pokrovsk, where a quarter to a fifth of the Russian assaults took place.

    “Pokrovsk is a vital road and rail hub, facilitating the movement of troops and supplies across eastern Ukraine,” Demetries Andrew Grimes, a former US naval officer, aviator and diplomat, told Al Jazeera.

    “Capturing Pokrovsk would disrupt Ukrainian supply lines and enhance Russian operational capabilities in the transportation and distribution of supplies across the entire front line,” he said.

    “The objective is likely to secure the rest of the Donbas and Zaporizhia,” said Michael Gjerstad, a land warfare research analyst for the International Institute for Strategic Studies.

    “This means possibly capturing Sloviansk and Kramatorsk, which have industrial and economic sites that are important for Ukraine, possibly moving towards Zaporizhia along the N15 road from the Kurakhove pocket, which would also bypass a lot of the Ukrainian defences, which face south,” he told Al Jazeera.

    These assaults, while clawing away land, were also costly. Bobovnikova said Russian forces were losing a mechanised battalion a week and a brigade a month in Toretsk.

    In the 10 days between December 17 and December 26, Ukraine’s general staff estimates Russia lost 17,400 soldiers, which translates to 52,200 a month. Russian recruitment capacity is considered to be not more than 30,000 a month.

    Nonetheless, Putin sounded bullish in his news conference. “We are not talking about advancing 100, 200, 300 metres; our fighters are reclaiming territory in square kilometres,” he said.

    The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington-based think tank, assessed that Russia had captured 3,306sq kilometres (1,276sq miles) of Ukrainian land during 2024.

    “The position of the front line is not going to be what determines this war,” said Keir Giles, a Eurasia expert for Chatham House.

    “In the economic and political domains, in Russia’s campaign against Ukrainian critical infrastructure and the systems for keeping people alive through the winter, it is also a picture of Russia holding an advantage, particularly after the arrival of Donald Trump,” he told Al Jazeera, referring to Trump’s win in the US presidential election in November. Trump has said that he wants to end the war immediately, and senior members of his team, including Vice President-elect JD Vance, have suggested that Ukraine would need to concede territory currently held by Russia as part of a ceasefire.

    Russia demonstrated its command of the air on December 25, with a massive air attack involving 78 missiles of various types and 106 Shahed kamikaze drones. Ukraine’s defences shot down 113 of the 184 targets, but many hit energy infrastructure.

    “Today, Putin deliberately chose Christmas for an attack. What could be more inhuman?” Zelenskyy said in his evening address on the same day.

    “The targets are our energy sector. They continue to fight for a blackout in Ukraine.”

    Five days earlier, on December 20, Russia launched five ballistic missiles at Kyiv. Ukraine said it downed all five, but falling debris hit a building that housed several embassies. It was part of a broader overnight attack that involved a sixth missile and 65 drones.

    Zelenskyy has been asking for ever-higher numbers of defence systems from his NATO allies. On December 19, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said the alliance would discuss how to provide the systems Zelenskyy has sought.

    Four days later, Germany announced a massive new military aid package, including two Patriot air defence launchers – each carrying four missiles, two short-range IRIS-T SLS launchers and one medium-range IRIS-T SLM launcher, each carrying eight missiles.

    Also included in the announced package were two Skynex 35mm air defence batteries, and ammunition for all these air defence systems.

    Next year, Ukraine is expected to receive four more IRIS-T SLM batteries of three launchers each, and three IRIS-T SLS launchers.

    During his news conference, Putin challenged the West to a contest between his new Oreshnik ballistic missile – test-fired at Ukraine for the first time on November 21 – and Western air defence systems.

    “Let Western experts propose to us … to conduct some kind of technological experiment, say, a high-tech duel of the 21st century. Let them determine some target for destruction, say in Kyiv, concentrate all their air defence and missile defence forces there, and we will strike there with Oreshnik and see what happens. We are ready for such an experiment, but is the other side ready?”

    Ukraine’s deep strikes

    Ukraine also struck at Russian energy and defence sites.

    On December 19, Ukraine’s military intelligence (GUR) said its saboteurs set “several” military refuelling stations alight in Novosibirsk, destroying them.

    On the same day, a Ukrainian drone attack on the Novoshakhtinsk oil refinery, the largest refinery in southern Russia, forced the plant to halt operations, The Moscow Times reported.

    GUR also revealed its saboteurs had been responsible for destroying an Antonov-72 military transport plane on the tarmac of Ostafievo airfield near Moscow on December 12. Footage published on December 22 purportedly showed a drone strike at the Steel Horse oil depot near the city of Oryol.

    The GUR said it had struck a warehouse in the Alabuga economic zone in Russia on December 23, where parts for Shahed-136 UAVs were stored. It claimed to have destroyed 65 fuselages of attack drones, as well as engines, navigation systems, and thermal imaging cameras for the production of 400 Shahed units.

    On December 26, Ukraine’s air force said it had struck an industrial facility in Russia’s Rostov region that produced fuel for solid-state rockets. The fuel from the factory at Kamensk-Shakhtinsky was used in ballistic missiles, including those fired into Ukraine’s civilian areas and power plants, Ukraine said.

    Ukraine’s foreign intelligence service estimated that Russian refineries’ downtime increased partly due to Ukrainian air strikes in 2024 to 41million tonnes from 36million tonnes last year.

    Zelenskyy told Ukrainians the armed forces would continue this policy.

    “We will definitely continue to strike Russian military targets – with drones and missiles, increasingly with Ukrainian-made ones, specifically targeting military bases and Russian military infrastructure used in this terror against our people,” he said in his evening address on December 21. “Our defence is entirely just.”

    The drone war

    Ukraine has prioritised the development of unmanned systems during the war to save manpower.

    On December 20, Ukraine’s national guard said it had successfully conducted a ground operation in Kharkiv using exclusively ground and aerial robotic systems.

    The assault included assault drones with mounted machineguns, kamikaze ground drones and drones capable of mining and demining. A spokesman who described the operation in a telethon also spoke of “large multi-rotor copters that can carry a large charge, for example, an antitank mine, and FPV drones. All this is supported and controlled by many carousels of surveillance drones. That is, we are talking about dozens of units of robotic and unmanned equipment simultaneously on a small section of the front.”

    Russia, too, has tried to keep up. Ukraine’s armed forces said they were facing a new threat in the form of Russian drones guided by fibre optics. The drones are immune to jamming by electronic warfare means and have proven successful on the battlefield – including in Pokrovsk.

    “We missed this moment with fibre optics and, frankly, we don’t know how to deal with it,” said Ivan Sekach, a spokesman for the 110th Mechanised Brigade.

    A special forces spokesman told ArmyTV that Ukraine was coming to grips with the new drones by shooting them down with Mavic drones or using their propellers to cut their fibre optics, rendering them uncontrollable.

    Ukraine is developing its own fibre optic drone, the Black Widow Web 10, which its general staff said is in the final stages of approval for use.

    Ukraine has been developing robotic and drone systems at a furious pace. Its armed forces introduced a new high-altitude battlefield surveillance drone during the past week. The Shchedryk can fly out of the range of most Russian air defence weapons and operates day and night.

    Autonomy is also a top priority for Ukraine, and a Ukrainian drone company recently reported that it had assembled a prototype of the first FPV drone made exclusively from components manufactured in Ukraine.



    The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine continues to escalate, with devastating consequences for both countries. However, amidst the chaos and destruction, another tragedy is unfolding in North Korea. Reports have emerged of North Koreans dying in droves, as the regime struggles to cope with the impact of the war on its already fragile economy.

    As Russia unleashes its firepower on Ukraine, the international community is rightly focused on the conflict in Eastern Europe. But we cannot ignore the suffering of the North Korean people, who are paying a heavy price for their government’s oppressive policies and isolationist stance.

    The North Korean regime has long prioritized its military capabilities over the well-being of its citizens, and now, as the country faces mounting economic challenges, the consequences are becoming increasingly dire. Reports suggest that food shortages are widespread, with many North Koreans struggling to access basic necessities. In addition, the country’s healthcare system is reportedly overwhelmed, with hospitals unable to cope with the influx of patients.

    As the world grapples with the implications of the Russia-Ukraine war, we must not forget the plight of the North Korean people. It is imperative that the international community comes together to provide aid and support to those who are suffering, and to hold the North Korean regime accountable for its actions. Only by standing in solidarity with the people of North Korea can we hope to bring about positive change and alleviate their suffering.

    Tags:

    1. North Koreans
    2. Russia
    3. Ukraine
    4. War news
    5. Human rights
    6. International conflict
    7. Eastern Europe
    8. Military intervention
    9. Global politics
    10. Foreign relations

    #North #Koreans #die #droves #Russia #unleashes #firepower #Ukraine #RussiaUkraine #war #News