Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: Enforcement
As Trump targets federal law enforcement, will the justice system ever be the same?
It is a phrase commonly attributed to Oscar Raimundo Benavides, Peru’s fascist dictator in the 1930s: “For my friends, everything; for my enemies, the law.” The Peruvian general, who first rose to power by way of a coup, used the phrase to summarize a straightforward authoritarian concept: Those aligned with the strongman who consolidated power can expect generous benefits; those opposed should expect to become targets of the state.
In 2025, it’s a maxim with renewed significance in the United States.
In the first week of Donald Trump’s second term as president, the Republican made his priorities clear by issuing sweeping pardons to Jan. 6 criminals, including violent felons who were in prison for assaulting police. In the president’s second week, Trump turned his attention from law-breakers to law-enforcers: As my MSNBC colleague Clarissa-Jan Lim reported, the White House fired multiple top FBI officials and federal prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases as part of a stunning Friday night news dump.
Citing Trump’s sweeping pardon for Jan. 6 defendants, a letter firing multiple federal prosecutors stated that their role in the Jan. 6 prosecutions was the reason for their dismissal, NBC News reported. One of the fired prosecutors, a former assistant U.S. attorney who handled some of the Jan. 6 criminal cases, told Politico that 25 to 30 of his colleagues were fired and others were moved to different offices.
The purge within federal law enforcement is very likely to intensify: Politico reported over the weekend, “Thousands of FBI agents and employees are being asked by Justice Department leadership to fill out a 12-question survey detailing their roles in investigations stemming from the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.”
The purge, in other words, appears likely to get even worse.
None of the FBI officials who’ve been fired — or those being considered for possible firings — have been credibly accused of wrongdoing. On the contrary, they did their jobs, did them well, and participated in the largest federal law enforcement effort in the history of the bureau, holding criminals responsible for an insurrectionist attack on the U.S. Capitol.
Trump, the convicted felon who once vowed to make the Jan. 6 rioters “pay” for their crimes, has now decided not only to shield the criminals from accountability, but also to punish those who enforced the laws of his own country.
It’s the latest in a series of dizzying developments related to Trump, his revenge tour, his White House team, and federal law enforcement. Indeed, over the last week, Americans have seen a series of related developments:
- Trump fired prosecutors who worked with former special counsel Jack Smith’s investigations;
- Trump fired prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases;
- Trump fired senior FBI officials, including the assistant director in charge of the FBI Washington Field Office, who helped oversee Jan. 6 cases;
- Trump’s Justice Department abandoned charges against the president’s former co-defendants in the classified documents case;
- Trump’s Justice Department abandoned the criminal case against a former Republican congressman who’d already been found guilty of corruption by a jury;
- Trump’s Justice Department took steps to abandon a criminal investigation against an incumbent Republican congressman.
All of this, of course, followed a series of pardons for criminals politically aligned with the White House, which came on the heels of earlier pardons for seven former GOP lawmakers convicted in corruption cases.
Taken individually, the disparate stories are scary and infuriating in equal measure. But taken together, an even more unsettling image comes into view:
They’re not disparate stories. They’re the same story.
For my friends, everything; for my enemies, the law.
Some of the White House’s partisan allies might be tempted to argue that this is a continuation of recent corruption. Those claims will be wrong: The Biden administration successfully prosecuted an incumbent Democratic senator, criminally indicted an incumbent Democratic congressman, searched the home of an incumbent Democratic mayor, launched an investigation targeting an incumbent Democratic congresswoman, and criminally indicted the incumbent Democratic mayor of the nation’s largest city.
Team Trump’s campaign to kneecap the rule of law, in contrast has been fast, thorough and systematic.
Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, said in a statement, “If allowed to proceed, Trump’s purge of our federal law enforcement workforce will expose America to authoritarianism and dictatorship.”
The New York Times’ David French added, “There’s a very real question as to whether federal law will apply to Trump’s allies at all during Trump’s term. The atmosphere of impunity may be like nothing we’ve seen in our lifetimes.”
It’s a critically important detail. The underlying message of Team Trump’s latest campaign against federal law enforcement is that Justice Department officials and the FBI need to exercise caution: If they try to hold Trump or his allies accountable for suspected crimes, the only people who’ll be punished are those who try to enforce the law.
Similarly, Republicans aligned with the White House are receiving a related message: They can do as they please, without regard for legal limits, knowing that the president has created an accountability-free-zone for himself and those who agree to follow him.
The result is a crisis unlikely any in modern American history. As Rachel explained during Friday’s show, in reference to the president and his team, “They are not trying to get rid of an investigation. They’re trying to get rid of American law enforcement as we know it. They are trying to get rid of the very idea of an independent, justice-is-blind system that makes America who we are.”
Rachel added that we’re confronting a dynamic that would represent “an end to the idea that law enforcement pursues justice without regard to favors and preferences dictated by the people in power.”
As Trump targets federal law enforcement, will the justice system ever be the same?In recent months, President Trump has taken aim at federal law enforcement agencies, including the FBI and Department of Justice, accusing them of bias and corruption. This raises concerns about the independence and integrity of the justice system.
With Trump’s attacks on the credibility of these agencies, there are fears that public trust in the justice system may be eroded. The president’s attempts to undermine the legitimacy of investigations into his administration and allies have raised questions about the impartiality of law enforcement.
Furthermore, Trump’s interference in high-profile cases, such as the Roger Stone and Michael Flynn prosecutions, have sparked outrage and accusations of political interference. This has led to concerns that the justice system is being manipulated for political gain.
The implications of Trump’s actions on federal law enforcement are far-reaching and could have lasting effects on the justice system. The independence of law enforcement agencies is crucial for upholding the rule of law and ensuring justice is served fairly.
As Trump continues to target federal law enforcement, the future of the justice system remains uncertain. It is up to the American people and the legal community to defend the integrity of the justice system and ensure that it remains independent and free from political interference.
Tags:
- Trump administration
- Federal law enforcement
- Justice system
- Political targeting
- Government accountability
- Law enforcement reform
- Legal system
- Impact of Trump policies
- Criminal justice issues
- Trump administration controversies
#Trump #targets #federal #law #enforcement #justice #system
Florida goes full steam ahead on immigration enforcement in schools
TALLAHASSEE, Florida — Gov. Ron DeSantis and Florida’s GOP-controlled Legislature disagree over key pieces of newly passed immigration legislation. But they appear to align on teachers and campus police officers being part of the state’s “all-hands-on-deck” plan to aid federal immigration enforcement.
While the exact role, if any, that school employees will play in that enforcement remains unclear – as does whether the bill will even become law – the measures proposed in Florida would ensure that campus doors are open to immigration authorities under a Trump administration that wants the option on the table.
“There’s no bar in the state of Florida for conducting immigration enforcement operations,” DeSantis said Wednesday during an event in Fort Meyers.
The passed legislation would require scores of government employees across the state to cooperate with Trump’s immigration enforcement efforts to the “fullest extent possible,” a charge that includes local teachers, school social workers and campus safety officers.
DeSantis plans to veto the legislation thanks to a conflict with state lawmakers over the bill’s scope, but he has been supportive of the concept of immigration enforcement possibly taking place in schools.
As angst swells over possible on-campus arrests in the country, Democrats argued schools should be off limits.
“Everyone wants dangerous criminals off the streets, but these are kids that we want to protect,” said state Rep. Robin Bartleman, a Weston Democrat. “It just seems like schools should be a safe place.”
During this week’s special session, Democrats needled Republicans over the issue, attempting to determine exactly what the “fullest extent” of immigration enforcement could mean for employees in local schools.
According to state Rep. Lawrence McClure, a Dover Republican who sponsored the House bill, it would compel them to “answer questions and investigative processes honestly.”
“To the fullest extent, in my opinion, is you give it your all,” McClure said on the House floor Tuesday. “You cooperate to the best of your ability.”
These responsibilities, though, could go further depending on what, if any, direction comes down from the Trump administration, as McClure explained after one Democrat asked if a teacher or social worker would have a duty to report a kindergarten student to ICE. School districts, under federal law, are prohibited from asking about a parent or child’s citizenship or immigration status for enrollment purposes, something Democrats say only adds to the uncertainty hanging over campuses.
“So long as it’s not privileged or other legal reasons why, the answer to all of these questions is yes,” McClure said. “To the extent that the federal government asks our folks here in Florida to cooperate, then yes.”
Democrats, despite their small minorities in both chambers, fought to scale back the bill by carving out schools and churches, attempting to create protections in state law similar to those created by the Biden administration and pulled back by Trump this month. Their proposed amendments were rejected by the GOP-dominated Legislature.
“The Trump administration lifted the policy restricting immigration enforcement in sensitive areas like public schools and religious institutions for a reason,” said Orlando Democratic Sen. Carlos Guillermo Smith, who introduced one amendment. “They plan on going in there.”
There have been no reported immigration raids or arrests in Florida schools or on campuses across the country so far. Schools in Florida are bracing for the possibility by putting out guidance for how officials should handle federal authorities showing up to campus and warning them not to interfere.
Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan, this week said that any potential immigration raids in schools would be vetted on a “case-by-case basis” if there was a national security or public safety threat, noting that “it’s never a zero game.” On one hand, Homan has said that children “shouldn’t have to fear ICE agents walking into an elementary school to arrest them,” yet he also implied that undocumented parents in the school pickup line are “not off the table either.”
“It shouldn’t be a chilling effect unless their child is a terrorist or a national security threat,” Homan said during an interview Monday with CNN.
“They’re in the country illegally — they’ve got a problem,” Homan added when asked about parents. “It’s not OK to enter this country illegally, it’s a crime.”
These sentiments have been echoed by DeSantis, who has pressed for Florida to staunchly aid Trump’s immigration enforcement efforts. Although the GOP governor is locked into a bitter feud with the Legislature over policy differences in their bill, DeSantis said he’s on board with potential arrests in Florida schools.
“We will affirmatively assist these operations across the state,” DeSantis said Wednesday. “It will probably be more dependent on them to see how they want to go in or what they want to do.”
“What Biden did, they said you can’t do sensitive [areas], and they drew big circles around any church, any school. The problem is, once you’ve done that, there’s almost no place that you can do it,” DeSantis added. “You could conduct a raid in the woods somewhere.”
Florida recently passed a controversial bill that allows school officials to ask students and their parents about their immigration status. This move has sparked outrage among immigrant rights activists and advocates, who fear that it will lead to increased discrimination and racial profiling in schools.The bill, known as SB 168, gives school officials the authority to request information about a student’s immigration status and report it to immigration authorities if they suspect that the student is undocumented. Supporters of the bill argue that it is necessary to ensure the safety of students and prevent criminals from entering schools.
However, critics of the bill argue that it will have a chilling effect on immigrant families, leading to increased fear and distrust of school officials. They also point out that immigration enforcement is not the responsibility of schools, and that this bill will only serve to further undermine the trust between immigrant communities and law enforcement.
Despite the controversy, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has signed the bill into law, signaling the state’s full steam ahead approach to immigration enforcement in schools. It remains to be seen how this new law will impact immigrant students and families in Florida, but one thing is clear – the fight for immigrant rights in the state is far from over.
Tags:
Florida immigration enforcement, Florida schools, immigration policy, student safety, Florida education, immigration laws, school security, student rights, ICE in schools, Florida legislation
#Florida #full #steam #ahead #immigration #enforcement #schoolsIncreased immigration enforcement impacts North County businesses
Good Morning, I’m Debbie Cruz. It’s Thursday, January 30th.
North County businesses are seeing the impact of increased immigration enforcement.
More on that next. But first, let’s do the headlines.
Hundreds of volunteers will take to the county’s streets today (Thursday), for an early morning census of the homeless.
According to last year’s point-in-time count, the number of people experiencing homelessness in the county increased by an estimated 3%.
The count is federally required, and HUD uses the data to determine how to distribute federal funding.
A new county behavioral crisis stabilization unit is slated to open in Chula Vista this summer.
The unit will operate out of the Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center.
The county board of supervisors voted in favor of the contract this week.
The new unit will provide care to people experiencing behavioral health episodes and will be located in the hospital’s emergency department.
It will offer resources for people with substance use disorders and mental illness.
In a related action, the board also voted in favor of adding up to 30 Medi-Cal-psychiatric beds at Paradise Valley Hospital in National City.
County supervisors also voted yesterday in favor of convening a special meeting in the spring on the Tijuana River border pollution crisis.
County supervisor Terra Lawson-Remer introduced the plan to coordinate with local, state and federal agencies.
“I want us to take some responsibility as our leading public health agency in the region to bringing these stakeholders together to say, hey, let’s get to it, what’s not getting done and how do we get the right people moving in the direction while also acknowledging that there has been work that’s been done.”
Some of those stakeholders include the CDC, the EPA and representatives in Sacramento.
From KPBS, you’re listening to San Diego News Now. Stay with me for more of the local news you need.
Businesses in the North County say they’re starting to see the impact of increased immigration enforcement with a drop in customers, and fearful communities.
North County reporter Tania Thorne has the story.
Recent images and videos of immigration agents knocking on doors and detaining people have instilled fear in many immigrant communities… and local businesses are feeling the impact. This person didn’t want to be identified out of fear. She is one of the many vendors at a marketplace in Escondido. “Our store makes between 1000 to $2000 for the three days that we’re there. Lately we’ve been selling 200, 300 a day. It’s been very, very slow.” She said community attendance was down out of fear of immigration raids. As a result, local vendors are losing the source of income they rely on. As federal operations continue, protests are planned in Escondido and San Diego this weekend. Tania Thorne, KPBS News.
The San Diego city council voted Tuesday to repeal a controversial footnote in city code.
Reporter Katie Hyson says it’s a victory that doesn’t go far enough for neighbors in southeastern San Diego.
The 2019 footnote allowed much denser housing – only in the Chollas Valley Planning Area. Where neighborhoods were formerly redlined and remain majority Black and Latino and low-income. City staff say the repeal will result in 465 fewer potential homes. Henry Foster III is the area’s councilmember. He supports denser housing, but agreed with concerns about how quietly the footnote was passed. “The lack of transparency and engagement in policy-making affecting neighborhoods, especially those historically discriminated against like District 4, is unacceptable.” Neighbors discovered the footnote after investigating why large developments were coming to lots that didn’t seem to be zoned for them. They want all projects relying on the footnote to be stopped. But city staff say state law requires existing projects to move forward. Including one in Emerald Hills. Developers plan to build more than 120 homes on a lot that would only allow 70 anywhere else in the city. City staff expect the repeal to take effect in April. The footnote would apply to any project applications completed before then. Katie Hyson, KPBS News
Over the last decade, the city of San Diego’s housing agency has relied on section 8 vouchers tied to specific projects to deliver more housing for homeless residents. In our latest why it matters segment, Voice of San Diego reporter Lisa Halverstadt says that’s changing.
These so-called project-based vouchers ensure developers can welcome people who can’t pay much rent and still cover their own bills for the property. This approach has helped dramatically increase the city’s stock of homeless housing over the last decade. But the Housing Commission recently made a tough call: It decided it can’t issue new project-based vouchers for the next several years. Here’s Housing Commission CEO Lisa Jones explaining her agency’s decision. “It is a step we need to take as we continue to assist thousands of families with low income who currently rely on our existing housing vouchers.” The commission hasn’t pulled from its Section 8 housing waiting list for families since August 2022. And now it is turning off a crucial engine backing projects for the lowest income San Diegans. So what does this mean? San Diegans who already have Section 8 vouchers will keep getting rental assistance. But housing developers and advocates fear the Housing Commission’s decision to stop offering project-based vouchers will affect the production of housing for especially low-income San Diegans for years to come. The city will eventually see a slowdown in new low-income housing, especially for people now living on the street who need homes with supportive services. I’m Lisa Halverstadt for Voice of San Diego and that’s why it matters.
The San Diego Unified School District is outperforming many other large districts in nationwide test scores released yesterday [Wednesday.] Reporter Katie Anastas says the performance gap between economically disadvantaged students and their peers continues to grow.
Four in ten San Diego Unified fourth graders performed at or above the proficient level in math. That’s up from three in ten in 2022. Economically disadvantaged students continue to have lower scores. Winnie Gonzales is a fourth grade teacher at Horton Elementary School, where many students are homeless or in foster care. She says the pandemic had lasting effects. “Even though, you know, they had instruction to be on their laptop a certain time and all of that, a lot of them had to be caregivers for their other family members. And so they, you know, they learned to not be as attentive.” San Diego saw greater improvement in fourth grade math scores than California as a whole. Katie Anastas, KPBS News.
Many decide to take a break from alcohol at the start of the new year.
With “Dry January” wrapping up, Midday Edition host Jade Hindmon spoke with doctor Jennifer Au (ow) from the Scripps Cancer Center, to learn more about alcohol and its health impacts.
Does it matter what type of alcohol you’re drinking? Or is it all equal? It is. In the end, it’s all equal. Alcohol is alcohol. Beer is really the alcohol and is no better than the alcohol. And wine is really no better than the alcohol in the spirits. It’s, you know, it’s just the amount of alcohol that you’re taking in. So some people will say, well, I’m drinking a light beer. Isn’t light better for me? Well, it’s light in that it has less calories than your average beer. But there still is that percentage of alcohol in there, which is, in the end, causing damage. And, you know, I mean, alcohol, it’s touted as a way to unwind, to relieve stress. What is it about that alcohol that can make us feel that way? It’s a I mean, it helps, but as you mentioned, it’s a depressant. I mean, it helps relax. And part of it, I think, again, it’s the way it’s marketed. It’s the culture of it. It’s not always the way you feel, because a lot of people will tell me they had their glass of wine to unwind, but then the next day they have these horrible headaches and they don’t feel good. So was there really a benefit of that, or was it that, you know, you’re you are feeling into, you feel like you have to have that wine to help you unwind and therefore that’s why you’re utilizing it. But it’s not really truly providing that benefit that you want it to be. Tell me more about alternatives. Like what do you suggest to patients who may not be able to drink to maybe get a similar feeling of unwinding? So in people who, you know, say have significant liver disease, who we say you really cannot have any alcohol. I really tell them to avoid anything that is similar in flavor to alcohol. Again, like those nonalcoholic beers, they still have a small proportion of alcohol. But also it’s that flavor. They’re not really trying to, get over or trying to overcome. And they need to really work to overcome that alcohol addiction. So in those situations, I say, you know, if we can, we try to find another outlet for our stress and so this is where a lot of times support groups can come into play. You know, there are groups like Alcoholics Anonymous that have been around forever or, you know, there is other there are other ones. There’s, you know, smart therapy and there’s other different types of groups that are available to help people. And I think that oftentimes they can try to help you retrain your brain or find other outlets to relieve your stress. Other than alcohol. So I do think that trying to engage in, exercise often can be helpful, you know, releasing those endorphins that can help you relax. Obviously, that requires a time commitment. And a lot of times with our busy lives, people feel that they don’t have the ability to get out there or go to the gym or go for a run. The weather’s too cold, but I think that is a wonderful way to try to relieve stress that doesn’t involve potentially putting harmful chemicals into your body. Do you have any advice for someone who maybe has been a long time drinker, who may be looking to stop or reduce their drinking? Yeah. I think that if it’s something that you are seriously considering, and a lot of times people are fearful of that because they’ve been drinking very heavily. It is always a good idea to potentially start by talking to your physician and seeing if, while cutting back and stopping, if potentially you need a little more support, whether it be with additional medications or closer monitoring to help you stop drinking. But looking into different support groups can be very, very helpful. Looking at your community center, looking online. There are a lot of options there. And sometimes, you know, talking to your really close friends and loved ones and you’d be surprised at how many people these days are actually making a move to cut back or to stop drinking. And people are oftentimes afraid to talk about it because they are afraid that their loved ones are going to chastise them or are going to ostracize them. But in fact, it is oftentimes the opposite now.
That was doctor Jennifer Au (ow) with Midday Edition host Jade Hindmon.
On yesterday’s podcast we brought you a story about ADU’s in Encanto. In it we misnamed the researcher Erik Wegmann. His name is Jake Wegmann. We regret the error.
That’s it for the podcast today. As always you can find more San Diego news online at KPBS dot org.
For your next listen, check out Midday Edition’s arts and culture episode, that includes an interview with San Diego’s new poet laureate.
I’m Debbie Cruz. Thanks for listening and have a great Thursday.
Increased immigration enforcement impacts North County businessesThe recent surge in immigration enforcement has had a significant impact on businesses in North County. Many employers rely on immigrant workers to fill essential roles in industries such as agriculture, construction, and hospitality. However, with increased raids and crackdowns, businesses are finding it increasingly difficult to retain and hire immigrant employees.
The fear of deportation has caused many immigrants to leave their jobs, resulting in labor shortages and decreased productivity for businesses. This has forced employers to scramble to find replacement workers, often resulting in increased costs and disruptions to operations.
Additionally, the negative publicity surrounding immigration enforcement has also deterred potential customers from patronizing businesses that employ immigrant workers. This has led to a decline in sales and revenue for many establishments in North County.
Overall, the increased immigration enforcement has created a challenging environment for businesses in North County, impacting their ability to operate effectively and sustain growth. It is crucial for policymakers and community leaders to address these issues and find solutions that support both businesses and immigrant workers in the region.
Tags:
- Immigration enforcement
- North County businesses
- Impact of immigration enforcement
- Business effects of increased immigration enforcement
- Immigration policy impact on businesses
- North County economy
- Immigration enforcement consequences
- Business challenges in North County
- Immigration crackdown effects on local businesses
- Immigration enforcement and small businesses
#Increased #immigration #enforcement #impacts #North #County #businesses
Lompoc residents protest potential immigration enforcement operations
Concerned local residents gathered in Lompoc on Friday to protest potential immigration enforcement operations by federal agents.
About 50 people were on the corner of Ocean Avenue and H Street, many holding Mexican flags as well as homemade signs — some with political slogans and others will messages of support.
A protestor there told KSBY they were there advocating for immigrants in the community as Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents begin operations in some areas of the country.
“I believe that the immigrants make Lompoc what Lompoc is. They are hard-working,” said Alexia Miranda, a Lompoc resident. “… The produce you eat, they work there at the field.”
Protestors also said that ICE is profiling the poor Hispanic community in Lompoc. KSBY has yet to see evidence of that occurring.
ICE has not responded to multiple requests for comment by phone and email.
Residents of Lompoc, California took to the streets today to protest potential immigration enforcement operations in their community. Concerned about the impact these operations could have on their neighbors and loved ones, protesters called for an end to the targeting of immigrants in their city.Chanting slogans and waving signs that read “No Human is Illegal” and “Keep Families Together,” the protesters made their voices heard loud and clear. They urged local officials to protect immigrants and uphold their rights, rather than collaborating with federal immigration authorities.
The demonstration was peaceful but powerful, with residents of all backgrounds coming together to stand in solidarity with their immigrant neighbors. As tensions around immigration enforcement continue to rise, the residents of Lompoc made it clear that they will not stand idly by while their community members are targeted and persecuted.
The protest served as a reminder that the fight for immigrant rights is far from over, and that communities must come together to protect and support one another in the face of injustice. The residents of Lompoc showed today that they are willing to stand up and speak out for what is right, no matter the cost.
Tags:
Lompoc residents, immigration enforcement, protest, community activism, immigration policy, civil rights, social justice, local news, immigration rights, solidarity rally.
#Lompoc #residents #protest #potential #immigration #enforcement #operationsSenators Marshall, Budd Reintroduce Bill to Deport Illegal Aliens Who Assault Law Enforcement
Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senators Roger Marshall, M.D. and Ted Budd (R-NC) re-introduced the Protect Our Law Enforcement with Immigration Control and Enforcement (POLICE) Act of 2025.
“Illegal aliens who assault police officers must be deported immediately. I am proud to join Senator Budd in introducing legislation that makes it clear that the United States will not tolerate attacks on our Nation’s law enforcement. We will continue to fight for law and order” Senator Marshall said.
Under the POLICE Act, assault of a law enforcement officer, firefighter, or other first responder by an illegal alien will be a deportable offense under federal law. This bill will further strengthen federal law following the historic passage of the Laken Riley Act requiring U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to detain an illegal alien who assaults law enforcement.
In addition to Senators Marshall and Budd, this bill is co-sponsored by Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC), Steve Daines (R-MT), Katie Britt (R-AL), Ted Cruz (R-TX), Eric Schmitt (R-MO), Bill Hagerty (R-TN), James Lankford (R-OK), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS), Kevin Cramer (R-ND), Jim Justice (R-WV), and Tim Sheehy (R-MT).
Senators Marshall, Budd Reintroduce Bill to Deport Illegal Aliens Who Assault Law EnforcementIn a bold move to protect law enforcement officers and uphold the rule of law, Senators Roger Marshall and Ted Budd have reintroduced a bill that would require the deportation of illegal aliens who assault law enforcement officers.
The bill, known as the Protecting Law Enforcement Act, aims to hold criminals accountable for their actions and ensure that those who threaten the safety and well-being of our law enforcement officers are swiftly removed from the country.
Senator Marshall emphasized the importance of supporting our law enforcement officers and standing up against criminal behavior. “Assaulting a law enforcement officer is a serious offense that cannot be tolerated,” he said. “We must send a clear message that those who commit such acts will face consequences, including deportation.”
Senator Budd echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the need to prioritize the safety and security of our communities. “Law enforcement officers put their lives on the line every day to keep us safe,” he said. “We owe it to them to ensure that those who attack them are held accountable and removed from our country.”
The reintroduction of this bill comes at a critical time when the safety and well-being of law enforcement officers are under threat. By deporting illegal aliens who assault law enforcement, we can send a strong message that such behavior will not be tolerated and that those who commit such acts will face serious consequences.
As the bill makes its way through Congress, Senator Marshall and Senator Budd are committed to fighting for its passage and ensuring that our law enforcement officers are protected and supported. Let’s stand together in support of our brave men and women in blue and send a clear message that assaulting law enforcement will not be tolerated in our country.
Tags:
- Senators Marshall
- Senators Budd
- Deportation bill
- Illegal aliens
- Law enforcement assault
- Immigration legislation
- Senate news
- Policy update
- Immigration enforcement
- Public safety initiative
#Senators #Marshall #Budd #Reintroduce #Bill #Deport #Illegal #Aliens #Assault #Law #Enforcement
On the Senate Floor, Cortez Masto Calls Out Trump’s Anti-Law Enforcement Pardons
“Earlier today, my Democratic colleagues and I co-sponsored a resolution to condemn these pardons. One would think that my Republican colleagues who claim to be pro-law enforcement would sign onto this resolution and stand against any action that harms our police.”
Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) blasted President Trump on the Senate floor for pardoning a drug trafficking kingpin and the violent criminals who assaulted police officers on January 6, 2021. A former prosecutor and Nevada attorney general, Cortez Masto urged her supposedly pro-law enforcement Republican colleagues to join her resolution condemning these pardons.
Below are her remarks as prepared for delivery:
Mr. President, I’m so appreciative of my colleagues coming down here to talk about not only the January 6 pardons that President Trump has done but to stand with the men and women in law enforcement.
When I’m home, quite often I will hear at times that “well, Democrats don’t support law enforcement, they don’t support the men and women who keep our communities safe.” And that’s just not true, as you can see today.
But here’s what I know, and this is why this was devastating to so many men and women who not only are Capitol Police officers right here, who defended our Capitol on January 6, who stand to protect us, but for all of the men and women in law enforcement across this country who are paying attention and watching what this president does.
Will he have their back when the time comes? Will he be there to truly support them in their time of need when they’re doing their job like he says he will?
Now, we’ve spent the last decade hearing Donald Trump talk about “law and order” and cracking down on crime. Last fall, on a national podcast, he called for giving our law enforcement their “dignity back”. Just last week at a White House press conference, he claimed to be a friend of the police.
Well, Donald Trump has been in office for just one week, and already his actions are making it clear that he doesn’t mean what he says. In fact, from his actions we’ve seen so far, he’s actively working against our men and women in law enforcement – not only here who work at this Capitol, but across this country.
Let me put this in starker terms that I think my Republican colleagues will understand. Mr. President, Nevada families across my state have been torn apart by dangerous drugs like methamphetamines and opioids. And that’s true for so many families across the country.
It doesn’t matter if they’re Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, or independents – illicit drug trafficking is impacting everyone in this country.
But last week, Donald Trump pardoned the founder of Silk Road, an underground internet site that oversaw the trafficking of $200 million in illegal drugs and other illicit trade.
The founder was convicted by a jury of his peers and sentenced to life in prison for participating in a criminal organization and distributing narcotics on the internet.
Americans died after purchasing illicit drugs on his website. A website that was specifically designed to skirt the law and support criminal activity.
But now, this founder is walking free because of Donald Trump.
Donald Trump giving a full, unconditional pardon to this drug dealer and criminal profiteer is a slap in the face to the victims of this crisis, and to law enforcement who work to protect our communities and to take drug traffickers like him off our streets.
What Donald Trump has done is not law and order, it’s chaos.
And it’s not just with this one pardon.
Donald Trump has also pardoned more than 130 individuals who were convicted of assaulting police officers right here at the Capitol on January 6, 2021.
I was here that day. I remember running into a Capitol Police officer who was pepper-sprayed by a rioter in Donald Trump’s mob. And at the same time that he was washing out his eyes, he was saying to us senators, “Don’t worry. I’ve got your back, and I am standing guard.” And he ran back out to the front of the Capitol. He was doing his job.
That day, those rioters and insurrectionists brought weapons and zip ties to the Capitol, they used WD-40 and bear spray on our officers, and they assaulted Capitol Police with American flags.
This isn’t some political conspiracy – these insurrectionists posted videos online of themselves shoving, punching, and attacking our law enforcement.
And now, instead of serving their time and facing the consequences for the dangerous actions they committed against our police officers, Donald Trump is telling them that not only were they wrongfully punished, but in fact, their behavior on that day is encouraged – as long as they’re doing his bidding.
Criminals convicted of attacking law enforcement are giving TV interviews saying that President Trump’s pardons have vindicated their actions.
This is an endorsement of political violence, and it’s an insult to the men and women who risk their lives every day to keep our families safe.
I know many law enforcement officers personally. As a former prosecutor and attorney general of the state of Nevada, I’ve spent most of my life working with some great men and women in law enforcement.
And by the way, I’m married to one. My husband worked in federal law enforcement his entire career. His priority was doing his job and keeping people safe, because that’s what our law enforcement is trained to do. To put their lives on the line every single time to keep our communities safe.
And it’s not just about the officers – it’s about their families. When you are the spouse or the loved one of an officer who gets that call, sometimes in the middle of the night, and they leave to address some crime or issue and keep your community safe, you don’t know if they’re coming back.
There are two calls that are the worst kind you can get as the spouse of a law enforcement officer. The first one is from your spouse saying “I’m in the hospital, but don’t worry, everything’s okay.” The second one is not from your spouse, but it’s from another law enforcement officer telling you that your husband or wife went out on a call and didn’t come back.
The sacrifices of not only our officers but their loved ones need to be considered. And if we truly believe in law and order and we truly believe that we should support them because they put their lives on the line every single day, then we should have their backs. No matter your politics, we should always be there to support them.
I will always stand up for law enforcement.
I’ve passed legislation to support public safety under administrations of both parties. And I will always speak out when our leaders act against law enforcement, whether they’re a Democrat or a Republican.
I disagreed with President Biden granting pardons to his family, I disagreed when he granted clemency for Leonard Peltier, who was convicted of murdering two FBI agents. And I disagree with President Biden in commuting the sentence of Adrian Peeler, who was convicted of drug trafficking and murder.
I also spoke out when President Biden nominated Adeel Mangi to be a federal judge. I did not support him because of his affiliation with a group that wanted to let cop killers out of prison.
That was me standing up for law enforcement.
So believe me when I say, this is not partisan; this is about standing up for the men and women who put their lives on the line for us every day.
This shouldn’t be hard. You commit a violent crime in our community, you should face the consequences.
Don’t take my word for it – the Fraternal Order of Police, which is the largest organization of sworn law enforcement officers in the world, has condemned Trump’s pardoning of those who assaulted Capitol Police officers on January 6.
But there are too many members of this body, who had the benefit of those Capitol Police officers on January 6 protecting their lives, who have been oddly silent.
Earlier today, my Democratic colleagues and I co-sponsored a resolution to condemn these pardons. One would think that my Republican colleagues who claim to be pro-law enforcement would sign onto this resolution and stand against any action that harms our police.
If we truly believe in law and order and we want to work together to keep our communities safe, we have to not only talk about it, we have to act.
Because the American people deserve better. The American people deserve a president who isn’t going to release violent criminals back into our communities. The American people deserve safety – and our law enforcement, who maintain that safety, deserve to know we have their backs.
###
On the Senate Floor, Cortez Masto Calls Out Trump’s Anti-Law Enforcement PardonsIn a fiery speech on the Senate floor today, Senator Catherine Cortez Masto called out President Trump for his recent pardons of individuals convicted of crimes against law enforcement officers. Cortez Masto, a vocal advocate for law enforcement and criminal justice reform, criticized the president for undermining the hard work and sacrifices of police officers by pardoning individuals who have shown blatant disregard for the rule of law.
“These pardons send a dangerous message that it is acceptable to harm those who put their lives on the line to protect our communities,” Cortez Masto said. “It is a slap in the face to every law enforcement officer who has dedicated their lives to keeping us safe.”
The pardons in question include those of individuals convicted of assaulting police officers, obstructing justice, and other crimes against law enforcement. Cortez Masto argued that these pardons not only undermine the integrity of our justice system but also put the safety of police officers and the public at risk.
“We cannot stand by and allow the president to use his pardon power to reward those who have shown contempt for the men and women who serve and protect our communities,” Cortez Masto declared. “We must hold him accountable for his reckless and dangerous actions.”
As the debate over criminal justice reform and police accountability continues to rage, Cortez Masto’s impassioned plea for respect and support for law enforcement officers serves as a reminder of the sacrifices they make every day to keep us safe. It is a call to action for all Americans to stand up for the rule of law and the brave men and women who uphold it.
Tags:
- Cortez Masto
- Senate Floor
- Trump
- Anti-Law Enforcement
- Pardons
- Politics
- Government
- Law Enforcement
- Criminal Justice
- Senatorial Speech
#Senate #Floor #Cortez #Masto #Calls #Trumps #AntiLaw #Enforcement #Pardons
Know Your Rights and Red Cards for ICE enforcement – NBC Bay Area
Immigrants across the country are on edge about possible Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations following executive orders issued by President Donald Trump.
Some local groups, including the Immigration Institute of the Bay Area, have created Know Your Rights and Red Cards as a reminder of what rights immigrants have and how to exercise them if faced with federal agents from ICE or the border patrol.
The Red Cards feature information about constitutional rights immigrants have, including:
- You don’t have to open the door to your home if a federal agent knocks
- The right to remain silent in front of federal agents
- The right to not sign any document unless you have a lawyer present
For more information about Red Cards visit ilrc.org or click here to download and print a Spanish version.
The Immigration Institute of the Bay Area also has Know Your Rights cards in the following languages available to download:
San Francisco city officials and community leaders spoke Tuesday about fighting for immigrant rights after a troubling incident involving ICE agents in the city.
Know Your Rights and Red Cards for ICE enforcementIn recent years, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has increased their enforcement actions, leading to heightened fear and anxiety among immigrant communities. It is important for individuals to know their rights when faced with ICE encounters.
One tool that has been utilized to educate individuals on their rights during ICE encounters is the Red Card. The Red Card is a pocket-sized card that provides information on what to do if approached by ICE, including the right to remain silent and the right to refuse entry into your home without a warrant.
It is crucial for individuals to be informed and prepared in the event of an ICE encounter. Knowing your rights can help protect yourself and your loved ones from potential harm or violations of your rights.
For more information on Know Your Rights and Red Cards for ICE enforcement, stay tuned to NBC Bay Area for updates and resources on how to protect yourself and your community.
Tags:
- Know Your Rights
- Red Cards for ICE enforcement
- ICE enforcement rights
- Immigration rights
- Immigration enforcement
- ICE red cards
- NBC Bay Area news
- Immigration laws
- Immigration policy
- ICE raids and rights
#Rights #Red #Cards #ICE #enforcement #NBC #Bay #Area
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem joins immigration enforcement operations in NYC
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem joined an immigration enforcement operation in New York City on Tuesday.
Noem posted a brief video of an arrest to her social media account.
The secretary is witnessing both criminal and civil enforcement operations, according to sources familiar with the actions in New York.
The criminal case involves a member of a Venezuelan gang that took over an apartment complex in Aurora, Colorado, the sources said. One alleged gang member was arrested in the Bronx.
The New York division of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration said it was working with partners at the Justice Department and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to assist the Department of Homeland Security with enforcement efforts.
Noem’s appearance for the operations came just days after she was confirmed by the Senate.
Noem, the former governor of South Dakota, will be charged with overseeing Trump’s immigration crackdown along with “border czar” Tom Homan.
“The Trump Administration will once-again empower our brave men and women in law enforcement to do their jobs and remove criminal aliens and illegal gangs from our country,” she said in a statement after her confirmation. “We will fully equip our intelligence and law enforcement to detect and prevent terror threats and will deliver rapid assistance and disaster relief to Americans in crisis.”
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem Joins Immigration Enforcement Operations in NYCHomeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem made a surprise visit to New York City to join immigration enforcement operations in the city. Noem, who has been a strong advocate for tough immigration policies, joined agents on the ground as they conducted raids and arrests of individuals suspected of being in the country illegally.
During her visit, Secretary Noem emphasized the importance of enforcing immigration laws in order to protect national security and ensure the safety of American citizens. She also expressed her support for law enforcement officers who work tirelessly to uphold the rule of law and secure the nation’s borders.
Noem’s presence in New York City sent a strong message to both immigrants and advocates of immigration reform. While some praised her for taking a tough stance on immigration, others criticized her for being too aggressive in her enforcement tactics.
Overall, Secretary Noem’s visit to NYC highlighted the ongoing debate over immigration policy and the role of law enforcement in enforcing these laws. As the debate continues, it is clear that immigration enforcement will remain a top priority for the Department of Homeland Security under Secretary Noem’s leadership.
Tags:
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, immigration enforcement, NYC, Department of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, immigration operations, NYC enforcement, immigration policy, DHS operations, border security, national security, immigration crackdown, immigration enforcement operations, Secretary Noem, NYC security measures
#Homeland #Security #Secretary #Kristi #Noem #joins #immigration #enforcement #operations #NYCWhat to know about the immigration enforcement raids in and around NYC
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and federal drug agents launched a series of raids in New York City on Tuesday morning.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem rode along with the federal law enforcement officials, who have broadly stated that their targets are “criminals.”
Here’s what to know about the operation and the broader context of immigration enforcement under President Donald Trump.
What happened on Tuesday?
ICE officers targeted at least two locations, including on Ogden Avenue near West 170th Street in Highbridge, and arrested at least one immigrant without legal status.
“Here in New York City this morning, we are getting the dirtbags off these streets,” Noem said in a video she posted on X. One person who was among those arrested had kidnapping, assault and burglary charges, she said in another post.
ICE arrested 969 people nationwide on Tuesday morning, according to a social media post from the agency. It wasn’t clear how many of those arrested were in New York City.
Why all the activity now?
The arrests in New York City follow Trump’s pledge to conduct “mass deportations” throughout the country.
ICE conducted similar targeted operations in Chicago on Sunday. That day, the agency announced the arrest of nearly 1,000 immigrants nationwide, significantly more than is typical.
Who is being targeted?
Trump’s “border czar” Tom Homan has said criminals and gang members would be the first targets of the Trump administration’s mass deportation efforts.
In an interview on ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday, he said people who threaten public safety and national security remain a “priority,” but that others without criminal records could also be arrested.
What’s different about these ICE raids under Trump?
Despite Noem’s presence, there’s no immediate indication that the New York City raids were out of the ordinary. Federal immigration enforcement officers routinely conduct actions in the city.
Under Trump, however, ICE arrests have ramped up in recent days.
Homan has also warned that ICE will make “collateral arrests” — that is, arrests of individuals who weren’t the initial targets of enforcement operations. Such arrests were banned under the Biden administration.
Have ICE arrests increased in NYC?
ICE has yet to release details about the number of arrests it’s made in New York City or regionally since Trump took office.
But the number of daily ICE arrests nationwide has spiked significantly. In the first few days after Trump took office, ICE arrested several hundred people each day across the country. That number surged to 956 on Sunday and 1,179 on Monday, according to social media posts from the agency.
The daily average was about 415 in 2023, according to ICE data. On Saturday, ICE implemented quotas for its 25 field offices, with each expected to make 75 arrests each day.
Where is ICE arresting people?
While there hasn’t been an official accounting, ICE arrested at least three people at a seafood distributor business in Newark last Thursday, according to Newark Mayor Ras Baraka and advocates who responded shortly after the raid.
Surveillance video obtained by ABC7 shows immigration officers searching an apartment building in West New York, New Jersey.
ICE officers are now allowed to enter areas that were previously off-limits, such as schools, churches and hospitals, under a directive from Benjamine Huffman, who served as the acting homeland security secretary in the first few days of Trump’s second term.
Prior to Tuesday’s enforcement actions, ICE had also been spotted conducting enforcement actions in Asbury Park, New Jersey, and West New York, among other venues.
How do the city’s sanctuary laws play into the enforcement actions?
New York City law prohibits city resources from being used in immigration enforcement.
Local police also can’t cooperate with ICE to help detain immigrants unless that person has been convicted of one of about 170 “violent or serious” crimes.
Mayor Eric Adams said he directed the NYPD to coordinate with the federal Homeland Security Investigations task force and other law enforcement agencies to arrest a suspect “connected with multiple violent crimes” on Tuesday.
The charges included burglary, kidnapping, extortion and illegal firearms possession, among other charges, both in New York and Aurora, Colorado, according to Adams and an NYPD spokesperson.
Such NYPD actions were “allowed by law,” according to Adams, because of the suspect’s criminal history. In a statement, the NYPD spokesperson said the department does not “assist in any manner with civil immigration enforcement, or allow any department resources to be used.”
“As I have repeatedly said, we will not hesitate to partner with federal authorities to bring violent criminals to justice — just as we have done for years,” Adams said in a statement on Tuesday. “Our commitment to protecting our city’s law-abiding residents, both citizens and immigrants, remains unwavering.”
The recent immigration enforcement raids in and around NYC have sparked fear and uncertainty within the immigrant community. Here’s what you need to know:1. The raids are part of the Trump administration’s efforts to crack down on illegal immigration. ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) agents have been targeting individuals with deportation orders or criminal convictions.
2. It’s important to know your rights. If ICE agents show up at your home or workplace, you have the right to remain silent and refuse to answer any questions. You also have the right to contact a lawyer.
3. Stay informed and be prepared. Make sure you have a plan in place in case you or a loved one is detained. Know who to contact for legal assistance and have important documents, such as passports and birth certificates, easily accessible.
4. Seek support from community organizations and advocacy groups. There are resources available to help immigrants navigate the complex immigration system and provide emotional support during this difficult time.
5. Stay vigilant and report any suspicious activity. If you witness an immigration raid or encounter aggressive behavior from ICE agents, document the incident and report it to a trusted organization or legal service provider.
Remember, you are not alone in this fight. Stay informed, know your rights, and seek support from your community. Together, we can work towards a more just and inclusive society.
Tags:
immigration enforcement raids, NYC immigration raids, ICE raids in NYC, NYC immigration crackdown, immigration enforcement in New York City, immigration enforcement updates, NYC immigration news, ICE raids in NYC neighborhoods, immigration crackdown in NYC
#immigration #enforcement #raids #NYC