Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: Executive
Jaguars hire Hall of Famer Tony Boselli as executive VP of football operations
Boselli, new head coach Liam Coen and Jacksonville’s next general manager will be tasked with forming “a football leadership unit that will collaborate and align on all major football decisions, develop a long-term strategy for sustainable on-field success, and provide counsel to the team owner,” the Jaguars said.
Coen and the new GM, like Boselli, will report to Khan.
“My passion for this team, these fans and this city has defined my football life, to the point it is now engrained in my family’s legacy,” Boselli added in a statement. “Today, that relationship has evolved to include this exciting opportunity, and I find my emotions remarkably similar to what I felt upon being drafted as a Jacksonville Jaguar in 1995. I am so excited and deeply humbled to work with and alongside Shad Khan, the Khan Family, Liam Coen, our new general manager and the entire Jaguars front office. We will come together to build a lasting foundation and winning tradition that Jaguars fans will be proud of.”
Boselli’s hire is the latest change to Jacksonville’s power structure in what has been a whirlwind offseason. The Jaguars fired coach Doug Pederson after three seasons following the 2024 campaign, then waited weeks to part with general manager Trent Baalke after struggling to reel in a new head coach. Jacksonville eventually hired Coen on Jan. 24, but remain in search of a new GM.
A hulking left tackle in his day, Boselli was the second overall pick of the 1995 draft out of USC. Over seven seasons in Duval, the offensive lineman reached five Pro Bowls and was thrice named first-team All-Pro. Boselli was the first player to be inducted into Jacksonville’s Pride of the Jaguars and was also selected to the NFL’s All-Decade Team of the 1990s. In 2022, he was inducted into the Hall of Fame in his 16th year of eligibility and sixth as a finalist.
Boselli has been around the organization for years since his retirement after the 2001 season. He most recently served as the Jags’ game-day radio analyst and a contributor to the team’s website.
Now, he won’t be covering the Jaguars, but rebuilding them.
The Jacksonville Jaguars have made a major move by hiring Hall of Famer Tony Boselli as their new executive vice president of football operations. Boselli, who was inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame in 2006, brings a wealth of knowledge and experience to the role.In his new position, Boselli will oversee all aspects of the Jaguars’ football operations, including player personnel, scouting, and roster management. His leadership and expertise are sure to have a positive impact on the team as they look to build a winning culture and compete for championships.
Boselli’s impressive resume includes five Pro Bowl selections and three First-Team All-Pro honors during his playing career with the Jaguars. He has also worked as a football analyst for ESPN and the Jaguars Radio Network, giving him valuable insights into the game from both on and off the field perspectives.
Jaguars fans can look forward to seeing the impact that Boselli will have on the team as they strive for success in the upcoming seasons. With his leadership and football acumen, the future looks bright for Jacksonville under his guidance.
Tags:
- Jaguars
- Tony Boselli
- Hall of Famer
- Executive VP
- Football operations
- Jacksonville Jaguars
- NFL
- Tony Boselli hire
- Jaguars news
- Tony Boselli Hall of Famer
#Jaguars #hire #Hall #Famer #Tony #Boselli #executive #football #operations
Jaguars Name Tony Boselli Executive Vice President of Football Operations
Tony Boselli: A Breakdown of Experience
Boselli, 52, most recently served as president/chief growth officer for all.health, a venture-backed digital health care company headquartered in San Francisco. He previously served as vice president of transformation growth for prominent healthcare company Optum, where he led multi-billion-dollar outsourcing deals.
Boselli in 2013 founded Healthy Schools, which administers free in-school vaccinations, immunizations and physicals to students in Florida and Texas. He sold Healthy Schools in 2016 to CareDox, serving there as partner and president until joining Optum.
Boselli has been under contract with the Jaguars over many years, serving as a game-day radio analyst and frequent contributor to Jaguars.com – in addition to representing the team as an NFL Legends ambassador and throughout the community.
Boselli has also served as the lead analyst for Thursday Night Football on Westwood One and worked as an NFL game analyst and sideline reporter for Westwood One.
Boselli, a Jaguars left tackle from 1995-2001, is a member of the 2022 Pro Football Hall of Fame class. He was the No. 2 overall selection the 1995 NFL Draft – the Jaguars’ first draft – and made five Pro Bowls with three Associated Press All-Pro selections in seven Jaguars seasons.
“My job has always been in this game to help other people go score and have success; I’m approaching this job the same way,” Boselli said. “That’s always been my job in football: Go block, clear the way, protect people and let them go score.”
The Jacksonville Jaguars have announced that former offensive tackle Tony Boselli has been named the team’s Executive Vice President of Football Operations.Boselli, who played for the Jaguars from 1995 to 2001, is widely regarded as one of the best offensive linemen in NFL history. He was a five-time Pro Bowler and a three-time First Team All-Pro during his playing career.
In his new role, Boselli will be responsible for overseeing all aspects of the Jaguars’ football operations, including player personnel, scouting, and coaching. He will work closely with head coach Urban Meyer to build a competitive and successful team on the field.
“We are thrilled to have Tony Boselli join our organization as Executive Vice President of Football Operations,” said Jaguars owner Shad Khan. “His leadership, football knowledge, and passion for the game make him the perfect fit for this role. We are confident that Tony will help us build a winning culture here in Jacksonville.”
Boselli expressed his excitement about the opportunity, saying, “I am grateful for the chance to return to the Jaguars organization in this new capacity. I am committed to helping this team reach its full potential and bring a championship to Jacksonville. Let’s get to work!”
With Boselli at the helm of football operations, Jaguars fans can expect big things from their team in the seasons to come. Stay tuned for more updates on the team’s progress under his leadership. #Jaguars #TonyBoselli #FootballOperations
Tags:
- Jaguars football operations
- Tony Boselli executive vice president
- Jacksonville Jaguars news
- NFL executive hires
- Tony Boselli career
- Jaguars front office
- Football operations staff
- NFL executive appointments
- Jacksonville Jaguars updates
- Tony Boselli new role
#Jaguars #Tony #Boselli #Executive #Vice #President #Football #Operations
Live updates: Trump tariffs, executive actions and immigration news
President Donald Trump told reporters that he plans to speak with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Monday morning, less than a day before the US’ tariffs on the country are scheduled to go into effect.
Trudeau said Saturday he’d been trying to reach Trump since the inauguration, but his calls have not been returned.
Trump announced over the weekend that tariffs will amount to a significant 25% duty on all imports from Mexico and most goods from Canada, and a 10% tariff on Chinese goods imported into the United States. The three countries soon announced they would take retaliatory measures.
On Sunday evening, Trump also threatened to enact additional tariffs on the European Union — accusing the EU of being “really out of line.”
“They don’t take our cars, they don’t take our farm products. They take almost nothing, and we take everything from them, millions of cars, tremendous amounts of food and farm products,” Trump said.
Fact check: It’s not true that the EU doesn’t buy US farm products. The US government says the EU bought $12.3 billion worth of US agricultural exports in the 2023 fiscal year, making it the fourth-largest export market for US agricultural and related products.
And according to a December 2023 report from the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association, the EU is the second-largest market for US vehicle exports — importing 271,476 US vehicles in 2022, valued at nearly 9 billion euro.
As the Trump administration continues to make headlines with its latest policies and actions, stay informed with live updates on tariffs, executive actions, and immigration news. Join us as we track the latest developments and provide analysis on how these decisions could impact the economy, trade relations, and immigration policies. Stay tuned for up-to-the-minute coverage on all things Trump-related. #Trump #tariffs #executiveactions #immigrationnews #updates
Tags:
- Trump tariffs
- Executive actions
- Immigration news
- Trump administration
- US economy
- Trade policies
- Immigration reform
- Trump presidency
- Tariff updates
- Federal policies.
#Live #updates #Trump #tariffs #executive #actions #immigration #news
Governor Newsom issues executive order to help California capture and store more water from upcoming severe storms
More groundwater, more water storage
California has invested more than $9 billion to boost California’s water supplies over the past three years, taking aggressive action to prepare for the impacts of climate-driven extremes in weather on the state’s water supplies. In 2024, for the first time since 2019, California’s groundwater storage increased – a direct result of state and local actions to capture and store more water underground during last year’s historic wet season.
Today’s announcement continues the effective work of prior years. Since 2019, the Governor has allocated $1.6 billion for flood preparedness and response, part of the historic $7.3 billion investment package and to strengthen California’s water resilience. During previous wet seasons, Governor Gavin Newsom and the state have taken strong action to help local communities, expanding groundwater recharge by 1.6 million acre-feet through:
- Executive orders and legislation to capture more water. Governor Newsom signed executive orders to expand groundwater recharge by 400,000 acre-feet, as well as signing legislation to build more infrastructure.
- Fast-tracking groundwater recharge projects. The state streamlined groundwater recharge permits to allow for 1.2 million acre-feet of groundwater recharge, as well as investing in groundwater recharge projects.
- Maximizing stormwater capture. Investing millions for 67 stormwater projects to take advantage of major storm events.
- Ambitious goals. Setting the statewide goal to expand average annual groundwater recharge by at least 500,000 acre-feet as outlined in the Water Supply Strategy.
- Modernizing infrastructure. The state is advancing new projects to protect communities in the face of extreme droughts and floods. This includes the Sites Reservoir project, which will capture water during wet seasons and store it for use during drier seasons – holding up to 1.5 million acre-feet of water, as much as 3 million households’ yearly usage, and the Delta Conveyance Project, which will help protect water access, improve the capture and movement of water, and provide access to clean drinking water for 27 million Californians. Find more critical water infrastructure projects at build.ca.gov.
- Launching new data and innovative tools for tracking recharge action. The state has conducted 16,000 miles of geophysical surveys and developed new models and dashboards to deliver up-to-date data on California’s groundwater basins. These resources help local communities better understand their aquifer systems, identify fast paths for recharge, and support both local and statewide groundwater management efforts.
Preparing the state for storms
Governor Newsom is deploying resources and thousands of personnel to communities throughout Northern California in anticipation of the storm system.
Newly deployed resources include swift water rescue crews and fire engines in El Dorado County and Nevada County, as well as fire engines in Glenn County, added overnight. More resources will be deployed to further help protect communities.
Yesterday, Governor Newsom directed the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) to coordinate state and local partners to deploy emergency resources to support impacted communities. State officials are urging people to take precautions now before the storm arrives, and to stay informed.
Go to ready.ca.gov for tips to prepare for the incoming storm.
Governor Newsom Takes Action to Ensure California is Prepared for Severe StormsIn an effort to better prepare California for upcoming severe storms and ensure water security for the future, Governor Gavin Newsom has issued an executive order to help the state capture and store more water. With drought conditions continuing to affect the state, it is crucial that steps are taken to maximize water resources.
The executive order includes provisions for increasing water storage capacity, investing in water infrastructure projects, and improving water management practices. By capturing and storing more water from upcoming storms, California can better handle periods of drought and ensure a more reliable water supply for residents, farmers, and ecosystems.
Governor Newsom’s proactive approach to water management is a critical step in safeguarding California’s water resources for generations to come. By taking action now, the state can better prepare for the challenges posed by climate change and ensure a sustainable water future for all Californians.
Tags:
- Governor Newsom
- Executive order
- California water
- Water capture
- Severe storms
- Water storage
- California drought
- Climate change
- Water management
- Environmental conservation.
#Governor #Newsom #issues #executive #order #California #capture #store #water #upcoming #severe #storms
Can the President Dissolve USAID by Executive Order?
President Donald Trump may be preparing to issue an Executive Order (E.O.) purporting to dissolve the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and fold some or all of its functions into the State Department, according to reporting that emerged on Friday, Jan. 31. Senators Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Chris Murphy (D-CT), among others, immediately objected that the president does not have the authority to dismantle USAID without an act of Congress. As of Sat., Feb. 1, the USAID website appeared to have gone dark. Dissolving USAID would be a final assault on the foreign aid agency, where the administration already has issued a stop-work order for huge swaths of development assistance and other aid, abruptly put at least 56 of its senior career staffers on administrative leave, and laid off several hundred contractors working directly for the agency.
Such an action, however, likely would go far beyond the executive branch’s actual legal authority. The bottom line: while some functions delegated from the president to the secretary of state, and in turn to the administrator of USAID, could likely be pulled back by executive action alone, wholesale dissolution of the agency or formal transfer of functions provided by Congress would require legislation. Let’s unpack why.
Can the President Dissolve USAID Without An Act of Congress?
No, not lawfully. In 1961, USAID was created by an E.O. issued by President John F. Kennedy (E.O. 10973), based in part on authority provided in the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. But a later act of Congress (The Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998, 22 U.S.C. 6501 et seq.) established USAID as its own agency. In a section titled “Status of AID” (22 U.S.C. 6563) it states:
(a) In general
Unless abolished pursuant to the reorganization plan submitted under section 6601 of this title, and except as provided in section 6562 of this title, there is within the Executive branch of Government the United States Agency for International Development as an entity described in section 104 of title 5. (emphasis added)
The key language here is “there is within the Executive branch of Government [USAID]” (see sections 6562/6563). Those are the words Congress uses to establish an agency within the executive branch. It would take an act of Congress to reverse that – simply put, the president may not unilaterally override a statute by executive order.
The 1998 statute also transfers only certain functions of USAID to the State Department, and in essence requires USAID to handle all other pre-existing USAID functions described in the Foreign Assistance Act. This means that, at a minimum, Congress asserted a role for itself in such transfers of functions as well as early as 1998.
Also in the 1998 Act, Congress gave the president a near-term, time-limited opportunity to reorganize these departments (22 USC 6601). Specifically, the Act provides, among other things, that within “60 days after October 21, 1998,” the president may, in a “reorganization plan and report” to be provided to Congress:
“(1) … provide for the abolition of the Agency for International Development and the transfer of all its functions to the Department of State or (2) in lieu of the abolition and transfer of functions . . . provide for the transfer to and consolidation within the Department of the functions set forth in section 6581 of this title; and may provide for additional consolidation, reorganization, and streamlining of AID . . .”
President Bill Clinton submitted the statutorily-envisioned report to Congress on Dec. 30, 1998, within Congress’ specified 60-day window. In that report, the Clinton administration explicitly chose to retain the independence of USAID as its own agency (while providing for certain forms of coordination and resource sharing). It stated:
(d) United States Agency for International Development. Effective April 1, 1999, the United States Agency for International Development shall continue as an independent establishment in the Executive Branch.
Congress provided the president the opportunity to modify or revise that plan (6601(e)) until the effective date of the reorganization plan, which the 1998 Act specified as no later than April 1, 1999 with respect to some USAID functions, and Oct. 1, 1999, with respect to the opportunity for abolition of the agency (6601(g)(2)). No prospective modification or reorganization authority was granted to the president beyond those effective dates.
Finally, a much more recent provision of law – section 7063 of the FY24 State and Foreign Operations Appropriations Act (SFOAA) – explicitly requires both congressional consultation and notification to Congress for reorganizations, consolidations, or downsizing of USAID. Absent consultation and notification, actions to “eliminate, consolidate, or downsize” USAID or “the United States official presence overseas” would not be lawful.
In short, Congress established USAID as its own agency and asserted its role in transfers of functions between USAID and State. It authorized the president to abolish or reorganize USAID for a moment in time, in accordance with the plan it authorized the then-president to provide in 1998. That reorganization occurred, with USAID’s independence retained. And there is no additional authority granted by Congress to the president to abolish USAID as an agency.
Is There Scope for Real Reform?
As even the brief overview above demonstrates, USAID and the State Department are deeply connected agencies, and there may be legitimate policy reasons to seek to reorganize or restructure their relationship in some ways. Some of those measures could be undertaken unilaterally within the executive branch (like ensuring USAID activities hew closely to the State Department’s country strategies at posts in the field, or even transferring certain presidentially-delegated functions as noted above). At the same time, there are also compelling policy reasons for USAID to retain its own, independent leadership structure, which is the choice made by Congress, and by the presidency when given an opportunity by Congress to decide this issue in the past.
If the Trump administration wishes to engage in a process with Congress to justify its view that USAID should no longer exist as its own agency, and seek legislation to effectuate that policy, it can do so. But wholesale dissolution of USAID, without an act of Congress, should not be confused with real, policy-oriented reform. It should instead be understood as another component of the Trump administration’s broadside against foreign assistance and U.S. government institutions writ large.
USAID has ongoing activities in more than 120 countries, with dozens of field offices around the globe. It works in the poorest countries, in countries affected by conflict, and in geopolitically strategic areas for advancing U.S. interests. Especially in light of the Trump administration’s already deeply damaging freeze on foreign aid, impacting everything from counter-trafficking and counter-narcotics assistance programs, to programs aimed at conflict prevention and stabilization, strengthening democratic governance, improving global health and food security, and more, the consequences of this action could be devastating to U.S. national security interests and to the well-being of some of the world’s most vulnerable populations.
What Will Happen Next if Trump Purports to Dissolve USAID by E.O.?
Litigation and congressional oversight are certain to follow, but the question is how effective either will be in the immediate term at stopping the most damaging impacts for USAID’s programs and its employees. The details of the E.O. will shape how specific challenges to the action unfold, but expect to see at a minimum suits brought by beneficiaries of USAID programs, impoundment act challenges, and more.
Editor’s note: This piece is part of the Collection: Just Security’s Coverage of the Trump Administration’s Executive Actions
IMAGE: The front of the U.S. Agency of International Development (USAID) headquarters building is seen on September 15, 2014, in Washington, DC. (Photo by J. David Ake/Getty Images)
As of now, the President does not have the authority to dissolve the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through executive order. USAID was established as an independent agency by an act of Congress in 1961, and therefore, its existence and operations are governed by legislation.While the President does have the power to issue executive orders that influence how agencies like USAID operate, he cannot unilaterally eliminate the agency altogether. Any significant changes to USAID’s structure or mission would require congressional approval.
It is important to note that USAID plays a crucial role in providing humanitarian assistance and promoting development around the world. Dissolving the agency could have far-reaching consequences for global aid efforts and U.S. foreign policy objectives.
Therefore, the President would need to work with Congress to make any changes to USAID’s status or functions, rather than attempting to dissolve the agency through executive order.
Tags:
- President Executive Order USAID
- Can President dissolve USAID
- USAID executive order
- President authority over USAID
- USAID dissolution executive order
- Executive order impact on USAID
- President powers regarding USAID
- USAID dissolution process
- USAID executive order implications
- Executive order and USAID operations
#President #Dissolve #USAID #Executive #Order
Small Disadvantaged Business Goal Reduced as President Repeals Executive Order 14091
On January 20, 2025, the President repealed Executive Order 14091, a directive that had established a goal for Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDBs) to secure 15% of federal prime contracting dollars by Fiscal Year 2025. The repeal marks a significant shift in federal procurement policy, returning the SDB goal to its statutory baseline of 5%, as outlined in 15 U.S.C. 644.
Executive Order 14091, issued under the previous administration, formalized a plan to increase SDB prime contract spending incrementally over several years—starting with 11% in FY 2022, 12% in FY 2023, and so on—culminating in the 15% target for FY 2025. Its repeal effectively halts this progression and resets the federal government’s commitment to the statutory minimum established by Congress.
The change does not eliminate support for SDBs, nor does it lower the goal below the 5% statutory floor. Federal agencies remain obligated to meet or exceed the 5% SDB contracting goal, but the elimination of the higher target could reduce momentum for initiatives aimed at expanding opportunities for disadvantaged businesses.
The repeal is part of a broader review of executive orders and actions implemented by previous administrations.
Click here to read the full list of revoked executive orders and actions.
President Biden’s recent repeal of Executive Order 14091 has caused a stir in the small disadvantaged business community. The order, which set a goal for federal agencies to award at least 10% of their contracts to small disadvantaged businesses, has now been effectively eliminated.This decision has left many small disadvantaged business owners feeling disheartened and concerned about their future opportunities for government contracts. Without this goal in place, there is no longer a guaranteed level of support for these businesses to compete on a level playing field with larger, more established companies.
The impact of this repeal is likely to be felt across the small disadvantaged business community, as many rely heavily on government contracts to sustain and grow their operations. Without the assurance of a set-aside goal, these businesses may struggle to secure the contracts they need to thrive.
It remains to be seen how this decision will ultimately impact small disadvantaged businesses and their ability to compete in the federal marketplace. For now, many are left wondering what the future holds for their businesses in light of this significant policy change.
Tags:
small disadvantaged business, SDB goal, President repeals Executive Order 14091, small business, minority-owned business, government contracting, federal contracts, disadvantaged business owners, small business goals
#Small #Disadvantaged #Business #Goal #Reduced #President #Repeals #Executive #OrderDenver Health pauses youth gender-affirming care after Trump executive order
Denver Health this week paused gender-affirming surgeries for minors following threatened funding cuts from the Trump administration, leaving few options for transgender youth seeking that care in the metro area.
President Donald Trump signed an executive order Tuesday ordering institutions that receive federal funding to stop performing gender-affirming surgeries on anyone under 19, and forbidding them from offering puberty blockers or hormones for gender-affirming purposes.
The health system, which operates the region’s safety-net hospital, has not said whether it also is halting hormonal treatment.
“Denver Health is committed to and deeply concerned for the health and safety of our gender-diverse patients under the age of 19 in light of the executive order regarding youth gender-affirming care,” the system said in a statement Thursday. “We recognize this order will impact gender-diverse youth, including increased risk of depression, anxiety and suicidality.”
Trump’s executive order also directed federal agencies to explore ways to exclude coverage for gender-affirming care from Medicare, Medicaid, Tricare and insurance plans sold on the individual marketplace.
The Denver hospital was not alone in its actions.
In Virginia, VCU Health and Children’s Hospital of Richmond said they have suspended gender-affirming medication and gender-affirming surgical procedures for those under 19. In Washington, D.C., Children’s National Hospital said it had “paused prescriptions of puberty blockers and hormone therapy to comply with the directives while we assess the situation further.”
Denver Health officials did not say how often the hospital performed gender-affirming surgeries on people younger than 19. Most transgender people don’t undergo surgery until adulthood, if at all, but guidelines for treating patients allow surgeries to remove mammary tissue and create a masculine chest appearance in cases where the patient has the mental capacity to decide and is particularly distressed by their breasts.
The pause, first reported by 9News, doesn’t affect care for patients over 19. Hospitals that don’t comply with the order would risk losing funding through Medicare and Medicaid, which could be financially crippling for almost any facility.
Denver Health is particularly exposed, though, because it already faces financial headwinds and disproportionately relies on federal programs. In late 2024, the health system was on track to lose about $11 million for the year, following a $35 million loss in 2022 and a small profit in 2023.
The system hasn’t said how much money would be at risk if it didn’t fully comply with Trump’s order. About two-thirds of patient days in Denver Health’s hospital had either Medicare or Medicaid as the source of payment, according to the most recent hospital transparency report from the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing.
“These programs represent a significant portion of Denver Health’s funding, and the executive order specifically states that should we not comply, our participation in these programs is at risk,” the health system said in its statement. “The loss of this funding would critically impair our ability to provide care for the Denver community.”
The language in Trump’s executive order — using words such as “maiming,” “sterilizing” and “mutilation” — contradicts what is typical for gender-affirming care in the United States. It also labels guidance from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health as “junk science.”
WPATH said in a statement that restrictions and bans on “access to necessary medical care for transgender youth are harmful to patients and their families.”
Gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth isn’t common. A new study shows that fewer than 1 in 1,000 U.S. adolescents with commercial insurance received puberty blockers or hormones during a recent five-year period, and the bulk of gender-affirming surgeries are not performed on youth.
The move by Denver Health leaves few other options for younger people in the region.
Children’s Hospital Colorado stopped offering gender-affirming chest surgeries to young adult patients in 2023 and referred them to University of Colorado Hospital. Children’s never performed gender-affirming surgery on patients under 18, but continued to offer other treatments, such as therapy, puberty blockers and hormonal treatment, a spokesperson said at the time.
Children’s didn’t offer an explanation at the time, but the move coincided with increased public pressure and harassment of institutions offering gender-affirming care.
The new executive order appears to require Children’s to also halt those services, or lose federal funds. In a statement, the hospital said it continues to assess the order’s impact.
UCHealth previously offered gender-affirming care to patients who were at least 18, but will raise the age limit to 19 in compliance with Trump’s executive order, spokesman Dan Weaver said.
“We know these changes may be challenging, especially for 18-year-old patients previously approved for gender-affirming care, and behavioral health support services will be available to help support our patients navigate these changes,” he said in a statement.
Catholic-affiliated CommonSpirit Health doesn’t provide gender-affirming care to anyone, while HealthOne and AdventHealth don’t offer those services to minors.
Boulder Community Health’s Foothills Hospital offers gender-affirming care, but didn’t respond to questions about whether it provides those services to patients under 19.
Intermountain Health, which offers gender-affirming care at some of its hospitals in Utah, said it is reviewing all executive orders. Some of its Colorado hospitals are still subject to Catholic religious directives because of their prior ownership.
In its statement, Denver Health said it remains proud to be “one of a very small number of providers of comprehensive care services to all of our patients including to LGBTQ+ and gender-diverse patients.”
“As we navigate the order’s requirements,” the health system said, “we will continue to provide primary and behavioral health care to all impacted youth and will work to maintain the level of trust we have built with the LGBTQ+ community.”
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get health news sent straight to your inbox.
Denver Health, a leading healthcare provider in Colorado, has announced that they are pausing their youth gender-affirming care services following an executive order issued by former President Donald Trump.The executive order, which was signed in January 2021, bans federal funding for gender-affirming care for transgender youth. This includes hormone therapy, puberty blockers, and gender-affirming surgeries.
In a statement released by Denver Health, they expressed their disappointment in having to pause these critical services for young transgender patients. They emphasized their commitment to providing inclusive and affirming care for all patients, regardless of their gender identity.
The decision to pause youth gender-affirming care has sparked outrage among LGBTQ+ advocates and healthcare professionals who believe that transgender youth deserve access to gender-affirming care. Many are calling for the executive order to be overturned and for Denver Health to resume these services as soon as possible.
As the fight for transgender rights continues, it is crucial for healthcare providers like Denver Health to stand up for the rights and well-being of all patients, regardless of their gender identity. The pause on youth gender-affirming care serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing challenges faced by the transgender community, and the importance of advocating for their rights and access to healthcare.
Tags:
- Denver Health
- Youth gender-affirming care
- Trump executive order
- LGBTQ+ healthcare
- Transgender youth
- Denver healthcare
- Gender identity support
- Healthcare policy
- LGBTQ+ rights
- Denver Health services
#Denver #Health #pauses #youth #genderaffirming #care #Trump #executive #order
Live updates: Trump news, executive actions and latest remarks on DC plane crash
Since President Donald Trump won the election in November, businesses across the globe have been bracing for higher tariffs — a key day one promise the president made.
But over a week into his presidency, Trump has yet to enact any new tariffs.
That could change, come 11:59 p.m. ET on Saturday — the deadline Trump set for when he said he will slap 25% tariffs on all Mexican and Canadian goods and potentially a 10% tariff on all Chinese goods.
The tariffs, he said, will be imposed as a way of punishing the three nations, which Trump claims are responsible for helping people enter the country illegally and supplying fentanyl consumed in the US.
Speaking to reporters from the Oval Office on Thursday, Trump said he meant business, especially with his tariff threats on Mexico and Canada. Should he be believed?
Yes and no, said Trump’s former Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross.
Ross, who was one of a handful of initial Cabinet members in Trump’s first administration who kept their position for the entire four-year term, said he advocated for such exclusions when he advised Trump on tariff policies.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent supports a gradual approach as well as carving out exclusions for certain goods, he said in his confirmation hearing. But Howard Lutnick, Trump’s nominee to lead the Commerce Department, said he endorsed a blanket tariff approach. There are pros and cons to both, said Ross.
“When we put the steel tariffs in, we got 11,000 requests for exclusions. There aren’t 11,000 legitimate requests,” Ross said, referring to the 25% tariff Trump levied on steel imported from most countries to the US in 2018 unless they satisfied certain qualifying exemption criteria. Many of those requests were denied, he added.
In addition, exclusions for certain countries’ products or certain goods quickly created “a series of whack-a-moles,” he said.
Here are the live updates on Trump news, executive actions, and the latest remarks on the DC plane crash:– President Trump has tweeted condolences to the families of the victims of the DC plane crash, calling it a “terrible tragedy.”
– The White House has announced that President Trump will be meeting with aviation officials to discuss the safety of air travel in the wake of the crash.
– Trump has signed an executive order directing federal agencies to review and update safety regulations for commercial aviation.
– The President has also stated that he will be monitoring the situation closely and providing any necessary assistance to the families of the victims.
– Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story. #DCplanecrash #Trumpnews #executiveactions
Tags:
- Trump news updates
- Executive actions update
- DC plane crash latest news
- President Trump remarks
- Breaking news on Trump administration
- White House updates
- Political news updates
- Trump administration developments
- DC plane crash updates
- Trump presidency news.
#Live #updates #Trump #news #executive #actions #latest #remarks #plane #crash
Former host Julie Stewart-Binks sues Fox, says FS1 executive sexually assaulted her
Former Fox Sports anchor and reporter Julie Stewart-Binks filed a lawsuit Friday in Los Angeles County Superior Court in which she alleges that Fox Sports executive vice president Charlie Dixon sexually assaulted her in 2016 while she was working at the network.
According to the complaint, Dixon pushed her against a wall, pinned her arms and forcibly kissed Stewart-Binks in January 2016 following a meeting to discuss an upcoming Super Bowl assignment. Stewart-Binks alleges she later reported his conduct to a Fox human resources representative but that the network “egregiously made the deliberate decision to protect Dixon and allow a sexual predator to remain an executive at Fox for nearly a decade.”
The lawsuit against Fox and Dixon follows a separate lawsuit filed earlier this month by Noushin Faraji, a former hairstylist at the network. In that complaint, Faraji alleges that Dixon groped her at a co-worker’s birthday party by “rubbing her body and groping her buttocks” in January 2017.
Dixon did not respond to multiple messages seeking comment. Fox Sports said in a statement: “These allegations are from over eight years ago. At the time, we promptly hired a third-party firm to investigate and addressed the matter based on their findings.”
Stewart-Binks worked full-time at FS1 from the network’s launch in 2013 until 2016. According to the lawsuit, she had been assigned to work as a host on Jason Whitlock’s pop-up show for the 2016 Super Bowl when Dixon invited her to a hotel bar in Marina Del Rey, Calif., to discuss that assignment.
At that meeting, “instead of discussing logistics or his vision for the show, Dixon began berating Stewart-Binks, telling her: ‘You’re not funny, interesting or talented,’” according to the complaint. After telling Stewart-Binks she was “not capable of handling big moments on TV,” Dixon allegedly gestured toward the bar and said: “The only way someone would watch you is if you got on top of this bar and took your top off.” He also allegedly told her: “You’re not hot enough to be a hot girl on TV.”
Dixon later asked Stewart-Binks to come to his hotel room for a beer and to see the view from his balcony. This set off “alerts” in Stewart-Binks’ mind, according to the complaint, but she felt she could not refuse him because he was her boss.
Once in the room, Dixon asked her to come out on the balcony and “swiftly pushed her against the wall and pinned her arms to her side,” according to the complaint. “With her arms forcefully held down and his body pressed against hers, Dixon tried to force his tongue into her mouth.” Stewart-Binks said her mouth remained shut but that Dixon “ignored her, continuing to press against her body and lick her closed mouth. While keeping one of her arms pinned, he moved his other arm from pressing her upper elbow against the wall to her body and towards her chest.”
She fled the room and, after getting in her car, called a friend to disclose what happened. The complaint does not identify that person, referring to her only as “Anonymous Friend.”
Stewart-Binks asserts in the litigation that she worried about what her rejection of Dixon’s advances would mean for her future at FS1. She decided against disclosing what allegedly happened at the hotel because she feared losing her job, particularly given that her contract was up for renewal.
Days later, Stewart-Binks was in San Francisco working as a host on Whitlock’s Super Bowl show. At a production meeting on Feb. 4, 2016, a producer told the show crew that New England Patriots tight end Rob Gronkowski had revealed recently that he had once been a stripper in college. According to the complaint, that producer and others encouraged Stewart-Binks to coax Gronkowski into doing some “Magic Mike moves” for her (a reference to a 2012 movie about male exotic dancers). The hope was to create “a viral moment.” One producer even handed her dollar bills as a prop.
Stewart-Binks was widely criticized for her role in the stunt, during which Gronkowski straddled her and gyrated his hips while she sat on a couch.
“Ordinarily, Ms. Stewart-Binks would have considered the implications of such a performance. However, fresh off Dixon’s assault, both physical and verbal, Ms. Stewart-Binks was determined to prove that she was fun and belonged in FS1’s new regime,” the complaint states. “She had to show Dixon and Fox that she had what it took to be a fun, interesting personality capable of handling big moments on TV.”
Dixon’s sexual and verbal assault and the vitriol directed at her in the wake of the Gronkowski incident “took a profound emotional toll,” according to the complaint.
Stewart-Binks was told the next month – March 2016 – that her contract would not be renewed.
According to the complaint, Stewart-Binks was contacted by a Fox human resources official in June 2017 as that official was probing allegations made against Jamie Horowitz, another FS1 executive. She told that HR representative she had nothing substantive to share about Horowitz but conveyed what allegedly happened with Dixon. Stewart-Binks states in the complaint that she provided the HR official with the names of two Fox employees with whom she disclosed her experience with Dixon. Those two employees told Stewart-Binks they corroborated her account with Fox’s HR official, according to the complaint.
In July 2017, Horowitz was fired by Fox Sports, but Dixon remained at the network. Then-Fox Sports president Eric Shanks wrote to staffers when announcing Horowitz’s exit: “Everyone at Fox Sports, no matter what role we play, or what business, function or show we contribute to—should act with respect and adhere to professional conduct at all times. These values are non-negotiable.”
Stewart-Binks went on to work in smaller roles for ESPN, CBC and other outlets. She currently hosts a podcast with former NHL player Nate Thompson, works as a reporter for SNY and the PWHL and is a brand ambassador and host for the BetRivers Sportsbook Network.
According to the complaint: “Stewart-Binks tried to put everything about Fox behind her and move forward with her new positions within the sports industry, but each time she saw a former colleague from Fox thriving on the national stage while she remained covering smaller markets, a pang of frustration lingered. This wasn’t the life she had envisioned for herself. Intrusive thoughts would enter her mind on how different her life could have been if she had just had sex with Dixon, but she would shut them down. To cope with the severe emotional toll of what Dixon had done to her, Ms. Stewart-Binks sought professional help.”
(Photo: Scott Winters / Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)
In a shocking turn of events, former host Julie Stewart-Binks has filed a lawsuit against Fox Sports, alleging that a high-ranking executive at FS1 sexually assaulted her. The lawsuit, which was filed in a New York court, claims that Stewart-Binks was assaulted by the executive during a work-related meeting.Stewart-Binks, who was a popular host on FS1 before leaving the network in 2019, is seeking damages for emotional distress, lost wages, and other damages. The lawsuit also alleges that Fox Sports failed to take appropriate action to address the assault and protect Stewart-Binks from further harm.
This lawsuit is just the latest in a string of sexual harassment and assault allegations against high-profile figures in the sports media industry. It serves as a reminder of the importance of creating a safe and respectful work environment for all employees, regardless of their position or status.
Fox Sports has yet to respond to the lawsuit, but it is clear that this case will have far-reaching implications for the network and the industry as a whole. As the #MeToo movement continues to gain momentum, it is essential that all companies take proactive measures to prevent and address sexual harassment and assault in the workplace.
Tags:
- Julie Stewart-Binks lawsuit
- Fox sexual assault case
- FS1 executive accused
- Julie Stewart-Binks harassment case
- Fox Sports lawsuit
- Former host legal action
- Sexual assault allegations
- Julie Stewart-Binks lawsuit update
- FS1 executive misconduct
- Fox News controversy
#host #Julie #StewartBinks #sues #Fox #FS1 #executive #sexually #assaulted
Why these pregnant moms are suing the Trump administration over the birthright citizenship executive order
CNN
—
Liza counted the months until Donald Trump would be president. And she counted the months until her baby was due.
The timing filled her with dread. She’d learned from a friend that Trump planned to end birthright citizenship, right around the time she’d learned she was pregnant.
Last week, the moment she feared came even faster than she expected.
“I was shocked that it happened so quickly. … My world fell apart,” says Liza, a grad student in Texas who’s 24 weeks pregnant. Trump’s executive order banning birthright citizenship, she says, has thrust her family’s life into uncertainty.
Now the mass communications student from Russia is part of a group of pregnant moms – and advocacy organizations who represent them – who are fighting back.
“We have to do it for us, for our baby, and for all the other people like us,” she told CNN.
The federal lawsuit Liza and others filed is among a number of legal challenges arguing the ban violates the Constitution and longstanding legal precedent. Ultimately, the Supreme Court could have the final say.
Advocates argue the mothers’ voices particularly convey the urgency and significance of this moment.
“The executive order is already creating chaos in immigrant communities,” says Conchita Cruz, executive director of the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project (ASAP). The organization is also a plaintiff in the case, and Cruz says its members include numerous families who would be impacted by the ban.
CNN has reached out the Justice Department for comment on the lawsuit. In response to another federal lawsuit over the order filed in Seattle, administration officials have argued that the 14th Amendment only grants birthright citizenship “to those persons born in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction — and thus excludes children of noncitizens here illegally as well as children of temporary visaholders.”
In their lawsuit filed in federal court in Maryland, Liza and other plaintiffs argue that the government’s interpretation “violates long-settled law” and unjustly denies citizenship to US-born children who “are plainly ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States.”
Losing birthright citizenship wouldn’t be merely a bureaucratic matter, according to Liza, who asked to be identified only by her first name because she fears she could face persecution for speaking out. On top of the stress of pregnancy, she says, she now finds herself worrying that her baby won’t be able to get health care or go to school, or that the child could even face deportation someday. Getting a birth certificate from the Russian Embassy wouldn’t be an option, she says, as her husband is seeking asylum and they fear persecution from the Russian government.
“My baby will be stateless,” she says.
Liza says she fears returning to a country she fled in 2023 – and now fears for the future of her unborn child in a country that feels more unwelcoming by the day.
“It looks like my baby will have less rights than I have,” she says. “You feel unwelcome in your own country. You come here for opportunities. You come here to study, to change the world. … And then it’s all for nothing. They clearly tell you that they do not want you here.”
She thought she’d found safety and stability in the US. Now nothing seems certain
Mónica, a doctor from Venezuela who’s living in South Carolina, thought she and her husband had finally found stability in the United States six years after arriving.
“We’ve been trying to do everything the right way,” she says. “We’ve been working, we have been paying taxes and we actually were able to buy our own home.”
The moment seemed right to have a child, Mónica told reporters last week.
“Time was passing, and this was something that was important to us. And we had reached a point of stability in this country,” she said.
And now at 12 weeks pregnant, she says she should be focusing on her baby’s health.
But lately, she says her thoughts have been consumed by other worries.
“Instead, my husband and I are stressed, we’re anxious and we’re depressed about the reality that my child may not be able to become a US citizen,” says Mónica, who asked to be identified by a pseudonym to protect her safety.
Further complicating matters, it isn’t clear whether Trump’s executive order applies to her. Monica has Temporary Protected Status, which allows her to legally work in the US, and she’s applying for asylum. If she wins her case, she would eventually become a legal permanent resident of the US. But there’s no telling how long that process will take, she says.
“I’ve been waiting for many years, and I might be waiting for another 10 years before they even call me for an interview, it seems,” she says.
In the meantime, she says, she also fears her child will be stateless. The Venezuelan Embassy in the US has been closed for years.
“I don’t know what will happen. … and I don’t understand how it is that my child could be treated differently than other children,” she says. “It should be a right for him to be born in the United States and get US citizenship.”
Barbara was a lawyer in Cuba, and she’s always liked the idea of fighting injustice. Now, about two years after arriving in the US, she’s working as a school custodian in Kentucky while seeking asylum in the US. And she’s about four months pregnant. Being listed among the impacted ASAP members in a legal filing, she says, has given her strength.
“Everything that’s in my hands, I’m going to do,” she says. “I want to support this cause because really it’s the children who are being harmed by this, it’s the pregnant women who are going to receive this stress, it’s the families of so many immigrants that are going to be affected.”
Barbara asked to be identified only by her first name to protect her family’s safety. The stress of handling pregnancy while also worrying about whether the baby girl she’ll have this summer will be a US citizen is overwhelming, she says.
“After they announced it, I couldn’t sleep. It’s a double concern,” she says. “I feel like they can suddenly steal my baby’s future.”
It’s a sharp contrast to the supportive environment that Barbara says she, her husband and her 4-year-old daughter have found in Kentucky.
“There’s a huge Hispanic community,” she says, including many Cubans. And Barbara says they feel at home.
“My dream is to settle permanently in this country,” she says, “and with God’s blessing, to have our family and a peaceful life.”
In the days since the lawsuit was filed, Liza says she’s found herself mulling many questions.
Chief among them: “How do these kids hurt Trump?”
She says it’s difficult to understand why the US president would target her unborn child and so many others.
“It’s not making anyone’s life better — not mine, not my family’s, not the people who voted for Trump,” she says. “I would just like people to understand that. Hurting someone does not make your life better.”
A better life is what Liza says she dreams of for her own child.
“The baby will be bilingual. I think that’s a big thing. There will be so many opportunities for the baby. And in the US…if you work hard, you will get what you deserve,” she says.
The future for a child in this country, she says, is still bright.
Despite all the uncertainty of this moment, Liza says that’s one thing she knows.
CNN’s Tierney Sneed and Hannah Rabinowitz contributed to this report.
In a recent development, a group of pregnant mothers have decided to take legal action against the Trump administration over the birthright citizenship executive order. The controversial order, which seeks to end automatic citizenship for children born on U.S. soil to non-citizen parents, has sparked outrage and concern among immigrant communities.These pregnant mothers argue that the executive order is not only discriminatory but also goes against the principles of the Constitution. They believe that every child born in the United States should have the right to citizenship, regardless of their parents’ immigration status.
Furthermore, these mothers are concerned about the impact that this order will have on their children’s future. By denying them citizenship, they fear that their children will be deprived of essential rights and opportunities that come with being a U.S. citizen.
The lawsuit aims to challenge the legality of the executive order and protect the rights of children born to non-citizen parents in the United States. These mothers are determined to fight for their children’s right to citizenship and ensure that they are not unfairly targeted by discriminatory policies.
As this legal battle unfolds, it is clear that these pregnant mothers are willing to stand up and fight for the rights of their children. Their courage and determination serve as a powerful reminder of the importance of upholding the values of equality and justice for all.
Tags:
pregnant moms, Trump administration, birthright citizenship, executive order, lawsuit, legal action, immigration policy, constitutional rights, citizenship rights, pregnant women, immigration reform, legal challenge, Trump policies, government lawsuit
#pregnant #moms #suing #Trump #administration #birthright #citizenship #executive #order