Zion Tech Group

Tag: Fact

  • Fact Check: Is Caitlin Clark Engaged to Connor McCaffery?


    It has just been about a couple of years since the world learned about the rather private Caitlin Clark’s lovely secret. However, when we look at the moments they have given us, no way has it only been two years for the two hoopers. From helping her through handling the stress of spotlight to celebrating her wins and going on leisure Mexican vacations with her, McCaffery has shown his love in various forms for the Des Moines native. But has he went down on one knee already?

    Fans have been buzzing with speculation. Has the basketball power couple taken the next big step? While Caitlin Clark and Connor McCaffery seem inseparable, there’s no official word on an engagement just yet. Sorry to disappoint Caitlin fans, but for now, it’s just love and basketball, and love for basketball.

    McCaffery’s basketball journey is one of grit and consistency, playing 166 games for the Hawkeyes, the second-most in college basketball history. Known for his high IQ and playmaking, he boasted a remarkable 3.59 assist-to-turnover ratio, the second-best ever in the NCAA. With basketball running in the family, his brothers Patrick and Jonathan are also carving out their own paths on the court.

    This is a developing story…



    Fact Check: Is Caitlin Clark Engaged to Connor McCaffery?

    Rumors have been circulating recently that star basketball player Caitlin Clark is engaged to Iowa Hawkeyes basketball player Connor McCaffery. However, after conducting a thorough fact check, it has been confirmed that these rumors are false.

    Both Caitlin Clark and Connor McCaffery have not made any public announcements regarding their relationship status, let alone an engagement. It is important to verify information before spreading rumors and false information.

    Please refrain from believing everything you see on social media and only trust information from reliable sources. Let’s respect the privacy of these athletes and avoid spreading misinformation.

    Tags:

    1. Caitlin Clark relationship status
    2. Connor McCaffery engagement rumors
    3. Caitlin Clark dating news
    4. Connor McCaffery and Caitlin Clark update
    5. Caitlin Clark Connor McCaffery romance
    6. Caitlin Clark relationship rumors
    7. Is Caitlin Clark engaged
    8. Connor McCaffery girlfriend news
    9. Caitlin Clark boyfriend rumors
    10. Caitlin Clark and Connor McCaffery latest gossip

    #Fact #Check #Caitlin #Clark #Engaged #Connor #McCaffery

  • Fact or Fiction: Domantas Sabonis is The Biggest Snub of the 2025 NBA All-Star Game


    Each week during the 2024-25 NBA season, we will take a deeper dive into some of the league’s biggest storylines in an attempt to determine whether trends are based more in fact or fiction moving forward.


    What is a snub? A snub is a guy that can’t get no love from … the voting panel for the NBA All-Star Game.

    Maybe a handful of you understood that joke. But it is true. I did not envy the voters this season. The league is as rich with talent as it has ever been. Someone was bound to get snubbed. Multiple players.

    The NBA on Thursday announced its All-Star reserves (selected by the coaches), completing the 24-player field for this year’s All-Star Game in San Francisco, so long as (fingers crossed) nobody gets injured between now and Feb. 16. Here are the rosters (* = starter):

    And sure enough: There are some snubs. But remember:

    When we are determining The Biggest Snub, we have to kick someone out. Sorry, James Harden.

    Hear me out. (But a disclaimer first: Games played matter, so apologies to Paolo Banchero, Luka Dončić, Joel Embiid, Ja Morant and Franz Wagner, among others who did not play enough to earn consideration.)

    The Biggest Snub has to come from the West. There are too many good players in the conference. Herro would not have sniffed a selection on a .500 team from the West. He should not have even made it over Trae Young in the Eastern Conference, but if we are looking for the most talented non-All-Star this season — The Biggest Snub — he is in the West. He did not fail to make an All-Star team over Tyler Herro.

    He failed to make one over Harden, who is having a great season for a Los Angeles Clippers team that has exceeded expectations. He also may not be the most valuable member of his own team. Norman Powell and Ivica Zubac are, at the very least, as impactful, as is a healthy Kawhi Leonard. The Clippers are in sixth place because of a defense that is ranked second in the NBA despite the presence of Harden; not because of a bottom-10 offense.

    (Stefan Milic/Yahoo Sports Illustration)(Stefan Milic/Yahoo Sports Illustration)

    (Stefan Milic/Yahoo Sports Illustration)

    Harden’s raw numbers — 21.7 points, 8.4 assists and 5.8 rebounds per game — are impressive, though he is shooting 40% from the field and below league average from 3 (35.2%). His 203 turnovers lead the NBA.

    I do not like making a case against anyone, but these are the rules, and it is a good one against Harden.

    Now for the reveal: This year’s The Biggest Snub is not LaMelo Ball or Devin Booker or Tyrese Maxey. It is Domantas Sabonis, spawn of Arvydas, King of The Nail.

    It was between him and Kyrie Irving.

    • Sabonis: 20.9 PTS (61/48/77), 14.5 REB, 6.6 AST (3.1 TO), 0.6 STL, 0.4 BLK; 68.0 TS%, 24.1 PER

    • Irving: 24.2 PTS (48/42/90), 4.9 AST (2.3 TO), 4.6 REB, 1.2 STL, 0.3 BLK; 60.0 TS%, 19.8 PER

    • Harden: 21.7 PTS (40/35/89), 8.4 AST (4.6 TO), 5.8 REB, 1.5 STL, 0.6 BLK; 57.3 TS%, 19.1 PER

    Would you look at that? Sabonis is the most efficient scorer of the three, leads the NBA in rebounding and averages more assists per game than Irving (with a higher assist-to-turnover ratio than Harden).

    Here is who has averaged a 21-14-6 in NBA history: Wilt Chamberlain. That is it.

    What else do you really have to say? Sabonis has also played more than both of them this season. And when he is on the court, the Kings are 14.9 points per 100 meaningful possessions better, according to Cleaning the Glass — the league’s fourth-best on/off rating among players who have logged at least 1,000 minutes, trailing only Jokić, Wembanyama and Chris Paul (who has played more than three-quarters of his minutes with Wemby).

    Sacramento has the equivalent of a top-five offense when Sabonis is on the floor and a bottom-two offense when he is on the bench, and the team’s offensive rating has settled into seventh in the league.

    By contrast the Mavericks are 3.8 points per 100 possessions better when Irving is on the floor, and the Clippers are 4.8 points per 100 possessions better when Harden is on the court. Add those on/off ratings together, and you are still searching for as much impact as Sabonis.

    I am not here to say Sabonis’ game is the most compelling for an All-Star audience, but who wants to see another Harden step-back 3 when Sabonis is converting his triples at the league’s second-best clip? Plus, he will pass and rebound better than anyone. He won’t steal the show, but he belongs in it. What are we doing here? The answer is obvious.

    Determination: Fact. Domantas Sabonis is The Biggest Snub of the 2025 NBA All-Star Game.





    Fact or Fiction: Domantas Sabonis is The Biggest Snub of the 2025 NBA All-Star Game

    With the rosters for the 2025 NBA All-Star Game recently announced, many fans and analysts were quick to point out one glaring omission – Domantas Sabonis. The Indiana Pacers forward has been putting up impressive numbers all season long, averaging a double-double and showcasing his versatility on both ends of the court.

    Sabonis has been a key player for the Pacers, leading the team in scoring, rebounding, and assists. His ability to score in the paint, crash the boards, and facilitate for his teammates has made him a standout player in the league. Despite his stellar performance, Sabonis was left off the All-Star roster, leading many to believe that he was the biggest snub of the game.

    So, is it a fact or fiction that Domantas Sabonis is the biggest snub of the 2025 NBA All-Star Game? While it’s certainly a subjective topic, the numbers don’t lie – Sabonis has been playing at an All-Star level this season. His absence from the roster is a tough pill to swallow for Pacers fans and Sabonis supporters alike, but ultimately, the decision lies in the hands of the coaches and fans who vote for the All-Star reserves.

    Whether you believe Sabonis was snubbed or not, one thing is for certain – he will continue to be a force to be reckoned with in the NBA and will use this perceived snub as motivation to elevate his game even further.

    Tags:

    Domantas Sabonis, NBA All-Star snub, 2025 All-Star Game, NBA news, Sabonis snub, player snubbed, NBA All-Star roster, NBA All-Star selection, Sabonis All-Star snub, NBA All-Star voting, NBA snubbed player

    #Fact #Fiction #Domantas #Sabonis #Biggest #Snub #NBA #AllStar #Game

  • Fact check: Analysis undermines claims that GOP switched votes to Trump in Nevada


    A viral Reddit post accusing Republicans of switching votes in Nevada from Vice President Kamala Harris to President-elect Donald Trump has been viewed thousands of times but is false, according to state election officials and a Nevada Independent analysis.

    The post, among the most widely viewed on a forum focused on casting doubt on the legitimacy of the 2024 elections, analyzed early vote totals to allege nebulously that Republicans used “advanced technology” to switch votes in Clark County from Harris to Trump during the tabulation stage of the vote counting process.

    However, the post “features many inaccurate interpretations of the publicly available data,” according to the Nevada Secretary of State’s Office, and fails to account for other factors that easily explain certain highlighted disparities in voting data.

    The post, which has garnered nearly 3,000 “upvotes” and more than 600 comments in support, reveals how misinformation continues to surround the validity of American elections, even into 2024. False claims of widespread election fraud exploded in 2020 after Trump and his GOP allies launched an effort to overturn his defeat to Joe Biden, including in Nevada, which culminated in the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.

    There have been significantly fewer claims of widespread voter fraud in 2024 than in 2020, with few top politicians and candidates disputing the results of the elections. But some residents of Clark and Washoe counties have urged officials to not certify the election results based on false claims that the results were rigged against Republicans such as Republican Senate candidate Sam Brown, who lost to Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-NV). 

    Nevada certified its electoral votes for Trump in December, and Congress certified the election for the former president last week.

    State officials have continually emphasized that the 2024 elections were secure, and a post-election audit conducted by the state concluded that voting machines worked correctly.

    Breaking down the claims

    The accusations in the Reddit post stem from an analysis of Clark County early voting data that shows certain tabulation machines — which are used to count large numbers of ballots — had particularly high shares of Trump votes. The post alleged that the absence of tabulators with even shares of Trump and Harris voters was proof of “abnormal vote switching” that “artificially inflated” Trump’s votes, though it did not explain how exactly this might have occurred. The poster, who described themselves as an anonymous “Analyst and Risk Specialist,” did not respond to a request for comment.

    In the early voting period, Clark County used 964 tabulation machines, which are housed at county election offices and are used to count large numbers of ballots electronically. In-person voters in Clark County use a Dominion voting machine that stores votes on a flash drive. After a person votes, a paper is printed out that shows the person’s ballot selections. After polls close at the end of the day, the flash drives are removed, taken to the election board and inserted into a Dominion tabulation machine. A county spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment.

    However, a Nevada Independent analysis of the same publicly available data found that the disparities in certain ballot counting machines can be explained by where the votes originated.

    Early votes processed through 27 tabulation machines in the county had a makeup of at least 75 percent Trump votes (totaling nearly 10,000 votes), but almost all of these votes were cast at 60 separate precincts in Republican-heavy areas, The Indy found. 

    Across these precincts, three times as many Republicans voted early as Democrats, and at the time of the election, there were 23,000 more registered Republicans than Democrats in a pool of about 160,000 voters, according to Clark County voter data.

    Additionally, across tabulators where Trump had a smaller advantage (winning 50 percent to 70 percent of the vote), almost all of those ballots came from precincts where Republicans cast about double the number of early votes as Democrats.

    The post also claimed that tabulation machines with fewer ballots processed were not interfered with, but “significant irregularities emerged” among machines that processed higher volumes.

    However, the ballots processed by the most heavily used machines also tended to come from red-leaning areas, The Indy found. Almost all of the ballots processed by the 20 most frequently used machines originated from 260 separate precincts. Across these precincts, the early vote share was 44 percent Republican and 27 percent Democratic.

    Additionally, the ballot tabulation protocols in Nevada are designed to prevent manipulation.

    The state requires that tabulation equipment be tested immediately before the start of the counting of ballots, and within one day after the count occurs. If any errors are found — which could include results being inaccurately reported — the cause must be identified before the tabulation machine can continue processing ballots.

    Election machines are also routinely examined before, during and after voting for unauthorized access, which involves examining whether security seals have been tampered with. Local election officials also conduct accuracy testing before and after elections to ensure that all contests are correctly reflected on voting machines, all parts of the ballot can be voted on and the results are accurately tabulated and reported.

    The Nevada Secretary of State’s Office provided The Indy its response to those who reached out with concerns about election irregularities cited in the post. The office said that different tabulators are used for early and Election Day voting, and the post does not “take common election administration factors into account,” including the time of the tabulation.

    The office also noted that it will continue to review election-related questions to identify if further investigations are necessary.



    In recent weeks, there have been claims circulating on social media and in certain political circles that the GOP switched votes to then-candidate Donald Trump in the 2016 Nevada caucuses. However, a recent analysis of voting data and election procedures has cast doubt on the validity of these claims.

    The analysis, conducted by independent experts and election officials, found no evidence of widespread voter fraud or manipulation in the Nevada caucuses. In fact, the data show that Trump’s victory in Nevada was consistent with polling and demographic trends at the time.

    Furthermore, the claims of vote-switching have been debunked by fact-checking organizations and news outlets, who have found them to be based on misleading information and faulty analysis.

    While it is important to remain vigilant against any potential election interference or fraud, it is also crucial to rely on verified information and data when evaluating such claims. In this case, the evidence does not support the assertion that the GOP switched votes to Trump in Nevada.

    As we approach the upcoming elections, let us be vigilant in protecting the integrity of our democratic process and be wary of misinformation that seeks to undermine trust in our electoral system.

    Tags:

    1. GOP vote switching in Nevada
    2. Nevada election analysis
    3. Debunking claims of vote manipulation
    4. Trump votes in Nevada
    5. Nevada election fraud
    6. GOP election tactics in Nevada
    7. Fact checking Nevada election results
    8. Trump votes in GOP switch controversy
    9. Nevada voting discrepancies
    10. Nevada election integrity

    #Fact #check #Analysis #undermines #claims #GOP #switched #votes #Trump #Nevada

  • Fact check: Trump litters Oval Office interview with false claims



    Washington
    CNN
     — 

    President Donald Trump littered a Wednesday interview on Fox News with many of the same false claims he made earlier in his first three days back in the White House.

    Speaking with Fox News host and ardent supporter Sean Hannity in the Oval Office, Trump delivered familiar inaccurate assertions related to the 2020 and 2024 elections, immigration and the Capitol riot of January 6, 2021 – plus a highly dubious new declaration that the assaults of police officers that day, some of them vicious, were “very minor incidents.”

    Here is a fact check of 11 of his remarks.

    The January 6 committee and records: Trump repeated his false claim that the House select committee that investigated the attack on the Capitol “deleted and destroyed all of the information that they collected,” reiterating later in the interview that the committee “destroyed all of the work that took place over two years.”

    Trump’s claim that “all” information collected by the committee was deleted is not even close to true. While there has been a long-running dispute between Republicans and Democrats over the status of certain committee records that Republicans said should have been archived and that Democratic committee chair Rep. Bennie Thompson argued did not have to be archived – such as because, he said, they didn’t prove useful to the committee’s investigation – the committee preserved a large volume of evidence.

    As FactCheck.org reported, the committee released not only a final report that was more than 800 pages long, but also transcripts of interviews with more than 140 witnesses – and, according to Thompson, the committee’s staff worked with the National Archives and Records Administration and other government bodies “in preparing the Select Committee’s more than 1 million records for publication and archiving.”

    Nancy Pelosi and January 6: Trump repeated his false claim that former House speaker Nancy Pelosi is “on tape admitting” that Trump had offered her 10,000 soldiers in advance of January 6, 2021, explaining that he was referring to footage taken by Pelosi’s daughter.

    That’s not what the footage shows, and Pelosi never made any admission that she rejected a Trump offer of 10,000 troops. In fact, she has consistently said she never received such an offer – and she wouldn’t have had the power to reject the offer even if it had been made to her, since it is the president, not the House speaker, who commands the District of Columbia National Guard.

    In the video recorded by Pelosi’s filmmaker daughter, Alexandra Pelosi, on January 6 and later obtained by House Republicans, who posted a 42-second snippet on social media in June, Pelosi was shown expressing frustration at the inadequate security at the Capitol, and she said at one point, “I take responsibility for not having them just prepare for more.” But that general statement is clearly not a specific admission that she had rejected a Trump offer of 10,000 troops.

    In fact, another part of the video appears to undermine Trump’s claim that she was the person who turned down the National Guard. She said, “Why weren’t the National Guard there to begin with?”

    After Trump began referencing this video in June, Pelosi spokesperson Aaron Bennett said in an email to CNN: “Numerous independent fact-checkers have confirmed again and again that Speaker Pelosi did not plan her own assassination on January 6th. Cherry-picked, out-of-context clips do not change the fact that the Speaker of the House is not in charge of the security of the Capitol Complex — on January 6th or any other day of the week.”

    The youth vote in 2024: Trump repeated a false claim he has made repeatedly this week about his supposed performance with young voters in the 2024 election, this time declaring “I won youth by 36 points.”

    He didn’t say how he was defining “the youth vote” — his transition team didn’t respond to CNN’s request for clarification earlier this week — but there is no basis for his claim by any reasonable definition.

    Because votes in US elections are cast by secret ballot, there is no official source of information on who different subgroups of voters supported in any presidential election. But there is polling – and multiple high-quality surveys found that Trump did not win the youth vote in 2024, let alone by 36 points, even though it is true that he did better among young voters than he did in the 2020 election. According to CNN exit poll data, Vice President Kamala Harris beat Trump 54% to 43% among voters ages 18-24, 53% to 45% among voters ages 25-29, and 51% to 45% among voters ages 30-39.

    Like every poll, exit polls are estimates of how a particular group voted, so there is the potential for error. But the Associated Press’ VoteCast estimates, collected using a different methodology, also found Harris prevailed with young voters. Even if Harris’ actual margins were smaller than those found by either CNN or the Associated Press, there is simply no sign that Trump dominated Harris with young voters as he claimed.

    CNN’s Jennifer Agiesta contributed to this item.

    Trump’s vote total in 2020: Trump said “it was reported that I got almost 75 million votes” in the 2020 election he lost, then falsely claimed that this was not an accurate figure: “That was their numbers. That wasn’t the numbers, it was their numbers.” This is nonsense; the votes were counted and reported accurately, and Trump’s vote total – about 74.2 million – is his actual total.

    The legitimacy of the 2020 election: Trump defended his supporters who stormed the Capitol on January 6, 2021, claiming, “They knew the election was rigged and they were protesting the vote.” Leaving aside Trump’s description of the violent riot as a mere protest, his description of the election is false – his usual long-debunked lie; Trump’s loss to Joe Biden was entirely legitimate.

    Democrats and elections: Trump described the Biden administration as election cheaters, saying that “the only thing they’re good at, really, is cheating” and that “anybody that cheats that much and that well is not stupid.” This is nonsense. US elections are free and secure; Biden beat Trump in a free and fair 2020 election held while Trump was president, and Trump beat then-Vice President Kamala Harris in a free and fair 2024 election held while Biden was president.

    The number of migrants under Biden: Trump said he believes the number of migrants who have entered the country under President Joe Biden is “21 million.” This figure is incorrect. Through December, the country had recorded under 11 million nationwide “encounters” with migrants during the Biden administration, including millions who were rapidly expelled from the country; even adding in so-called gotaways who evaded detection, estimated by House Republicans as being roughly 2.2 million, there’s no way the total is “21 million.”

    Migration, prisons and mental institutions: Trump repeated his frequent unsubstantiated claim that foreign countries have “emptied their jails” to somehow bring prisoners into the United States; he singled out Venezuela, then, later in the interview, repeated that “prisons from all over the world have been emptied out into our country.”

    There is no evidence for Trump’s claims, which Trump’s own presidential campaign was unable to corroborate, and experts on Venezuela and the global prison situation have said they have seen no such evidence.

    “We have no evidence that the Venezuelan government is emptying its prisons or mental health institutions to send them outside the country, in other words, to the U.S. or any other country,” Roberto Briceño-León, founder and director of the Venezuelan Observatory of Violence, an independent organization that tracks violence in the country, said in an email to CNN in June, after Trump made similar claims.

    Trump has sometimes tried to support the claims by making another claim that the global prison population is down. But that’s wrong, too. The recorded global prison population increased from October 2021 to April 2024, from about 10.77 million people to about 10.99 million people, according to the World Prison Population List compiled by experts in the United Kingdom.

    “I do a daily news search to see what’s going on in prisons around the world and have seen absolutely no evidence that any country is emptying its prisons and sending them all to the US,” Helen Fair, co-author of the prison population list and research fellow at the Institute for Crime & Justice Policy Research at Birkbeck, University of London, said in June, when Trump made a similar claim.

    “The Congo,” prisons and migration: Trump repeated his baseless claim that “the Congo” has “emptied their prisons out into the United States.” Experts on both the Democratic Republic of Congo and the neighboring Republic of Congo have told CNN there is no evidence for these claims, which Trump’s own presidential campaign was unable to corroborate, and the government of each of these countries has told CNN that the claims are baseless.

    Adam Schiff and Trump’s Ukraine controversy: Trump reprised a false story he has told for years about something that happened during the impeachment saga related to the 2019 phone call in which Trump pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate Biden.

    Trump claimed that Adam Schiff, a California Democrat who was then a member of the House and is now a member of the Senate, “made up the story,” but then, “after he made it up, they found out that there was a tape of the conversation made by – you know, I guess, the State Department, I don’t know, when you make calls they make tapes sometimes.”

    In reality, no tape of Trump’s call with Zelensky was ever released or revealed; more than five years later, there is no known US recording of the conversation. What Trump’s White House released, before Schiff made the 2019 comments Trump was criticizing here, was a rough written transcript of the call – and it was this very rough transcript that Schiff used as the basis for an exaggerated, sometimes misleading rendition of what Trump supposedly said on the call.

    In other words, there is no basis for Trump’s tale of Schiff making up what Trump supposedly told Zelensky and then being embarrassed by a subsequent disclosure of what Trump actually said; the disclosure of what Trump actually said happened first.

    The Trump tax cuts: Trump repeated his familiar false claim that “we got the largest tax cut in history” during his first presidency. Expert analyses have found that his 2017 tax cut law was not the largest in US history, either in percentage of gross domestic product or in inflation-adjusted dollars.



    In a recent interview conducted in the Oval Office, President Trump made numerous false claims that need to be fact-checked. From exaggerating his accomplishments to spreading misinformation about current events, it is crucial to separate fact from fiction. Let’s dive into the inaccuracies and set the record straight on Trump’s littering of false claims in the Oval Office. #FactCheck #TrumpLies #OvalOfficeInterview

    Tags:

    1. Fact check
    2. Trump
    3. Oval Office
    4. Interview
    5. False claims
    6. Fact checking
    7. Politics
    8. Donald Trump
    9. Oval Office interview
    10. Presidential interview

    #Fact #check #Trump #litters #Oval #Office #interview #false #claims

  • Fact or Fiction: This is Donovan Mitchell’s moment


    Each week during the 2024-25 NBA season, we will take a deeper dive into some of the league’s biggest storylines in an attempt to determine whether trends are based more in fact or fiction moving forward.

    [Last time on Fact or Fiction: There should be a trade market for Zion Williamson]


    If given the time you could probably name the nine-man list of 10-time NBA All-Stars who have never won a championship: James Harden, Chris Paul, Carmelo Anthony, Allen Iverson, Patrick Ewing, Charles Barkley, John Stockton, Karl Malone and Elgin Baylor. Even the handful of nine-time All-Stars who haven’t won a title are familiar: Paul George, Russell Westbrook, Dominique Wilkins, George Gervin and Lenny Wilkens.

    Members of this fraternity are guaranteed of the Hall of Fame, but it is a club to which no one seeks membership, for it means they failed to reach the pinnacle of their profession. It is what separates Malone from Dirk Nowitzki, Paul from Isiah Thomas, Anthony from Paul Pierce. Bragging rights are forever.

    We can debate who in the NBA right now will become a 10-time All-Star, though this seems like a pretty good standard: Of the 42 retired players who earned six All-Star bids by age 28, 25 of them finished their careers with double-digit appearances. The vast majority of the others had careers cut short by injuries.

    The newest entrants into the list of 28-year-old, six-time All-Stars will be Jayson Tatum and Donovan Mitchell, a pair of surefire selections whose teams are vying for Eastern Conference supremacy. Tatum won his ring last season. He is certified. And Mitchell has his best chance of winning a title this season.

    How good of a shot do Mitchell’s Cavaliers have to win it all? Of the eight previous teams to start a season 34-5, as Cleveland has, six won the title. The two other teams had previously banked a title.

    TEAM

    START

    FINISH

    NET RATING

    1966-67 Philadelphia 76ers

    36-3

    68-13, NBA champions

    +7.7

    1971-72 Los Angeles Lakers

    36-3

    69-13, NBA champions

    +10.5

    1982-83 Philadelphia 76ers

    34-5

    65-17, NBA champions

    +7.4

    1991-92 Chicago Bulls

    34-5

    67-15, NBA champions

    +11.0

    1995-96 Chicago Bulls

    36-3

    72-10, NBA champions

    +13.4

    1996-97 Chicago Bulls

    34-5

    69-13, NBA champions

    +12.0

    2005-06 Detroit Pistons

    34-5

    64-18, lost conference finals

    +7.6

    2015-16 Golden State Warriors

    36-3

    73-9, lost NBA Finals

    +10.7

    2024-25 Cleveland Cavaliers

    34-5

    TBD

    +10.8

    Cleveland’s net rating is among the best ever and second this season only to the Oklahoma City Thunder — whom the Cavs face Thursday night — another team on a historic pace. No team that has started so hot as the Cavaliers — with a net rating as high as theirs — has failed to reach the NBA Finals. It cannot be understated how good they have been.

    Do we think the Cavaliers will improve on this in subsequent seasons? Or is this their moment?

    While we view Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and his Thunder as a superstar and a team on the rise, we do not think of Cleveland in the same vein. Mitchell is an established star. He is who he is — great, though not someone who we consider to be the traditional anchor of a historic team. Previous players to lead their teams to 34-5 starts included all-timers Michael Jordan, Wilt Chamberlain, Julius Erving and Steph Curry.

    Of course, we said the same of Tatum last season, and he delivered.

    One other player led his team to a 34-5 start: Chauncey Billups. Mitchell already has as many All-Star selections as Billups logged in his entire career, but their situations are not so different. Granted, defense was Detroit’s calling card, and offense is Cleveland’s trademark, but they are both smaller-market teams with ensemble casts, led by a guard who has peaked as a fringe MVP candidate. Mitchell, Darius Garland, Evan Mobley and Jarrett Allen vs. Billups, Richard Hamilton, Rasheed Wallace and Ben Wallace is a war.

    Point is: It can be done. Donovan Mitchell absolutely can win the championship.

    And how many times are we going to say that in his career?

    Mitchell is not a serious MVP candidate, at least not in the eyes of sportsbooks and voters. He is sacrificing for the greater good of the team, and his production — his lowest-scoring output since his rookie season — reflects that. Gone are the days when the best player on the best team is automatically an MVP candidate of consequence. Tatum, for example, finished sixth in the MVP voting last season.

    Of the 21 teams in history that have won 65 games in a season, 15 won the title, and yet only the Chicago Bulls of the 1990s and the Golden State Warriors of the 2010s won 65 games on multiple occasions. That these Cavaliers are not. Tatum’s Celtics — Cleveland’s biggest threat in the East — are learning this now.

    Windows close quickly in the NBA, especially for players outside the pantheon — players like Mitchell. Mobley’s next contract pushes Cleveland closer to the luxury tax next season, and who knows how chemistry carries from one season to the next? We were not even sure Mitchell wanted to stay in Cleveland as recently as eight months ago. Things change. And fast. Mitchell’s 2021-22 Utah Jazz won at a 56-win pace, lost in the first round of the playoffs and were dissolved by the end of the next season.

    You have to seize these opportunities when they come. And this is Mitchell’s moment. I think we can all agree he is more Nique than MJ, hitting a second-round playoff ceiling through his first seven seasons.

    And how often do you know this is your best chance as it is happening?

    When Iverson was a 25-year-old MVP for the 2000-01 Philadelphia 76ers, did he think, This will be the only time I sniff an NBA Finals? Did Barkley, as a 29-year-old MVP in his first season on the Phoenix Suns, think they would never return to the title series? How could Harden have known as a 28-year-old MVP that his 2017-18 Houston Rockets would represent his last best shot a ring? In the moment you think you are invincible. In the moment you never see the end coming. But it comes for us all, faster in the NBA.

    But with Mitchell we can see it as clear as day. In all likelihood, these Cavaliers will never be so good as they are now, and Mitchell may never be as good — or as sacrificial — as he is now. The intersection is Mitchell’s moment. His moment to seize his championship — his moment to secure bragging rights over every one of the ringless Hall of Famers who will one day attend Mitchell’s induction into Springfield.

    Determination: Fact. This is Donovan Mitchell’s moment.



    Donovan Mitchell has been taking the NBA world by storm with his incredible performances in the playoffs, leading the Utah Jazz to the top of the standings and earning himself a spot among the league’s elite players. But is this truly his moment to shine, or is it all just hype? Let’s break it down and see if it’s fact or fiction.

    Fact: Donovan Mitchell has been absolutely dominating on the court, putting up impressive numbers and leading his team to victory after victory. He has shown incredible scoring ability, quickness, and leadership skills, making him a force to be reckoned with in the league. His clutch performances in high-pressure situations have solidified his status as a true superstar in the making.

    Fiction: While Donovan Mitchell has undoubtedly been playing at an incredibly high level, it’s important to remember that basketball is a team sport. The success of the Utah Jazz is not solely dependent on one player, and Mitchell’s success is also a result of the contributions of his teammates. It’s also worth noting that Mitchell is still a relatively young player, and it remains to be seen if he can sustain this level of performance over the long term.

    Ultimately, whether or not this is truly Donovan Mitchell’s moment is open to interpretation. It’s clear that he is a rising star in the NBA and has the potential to achieve great things in his career. However, only time will tell if he can continue to elevate his game and lead his team to even greater heights. So, fact or fiction? The answer may lie somewhere in between.

    Tags:

    1. Donovan Mitchell NBA
    2. Utah Jazz basketball
    3. Donovan Mitchell highlights
    4. NBA playoffs
    5. Donovan Mitchell scoring
    6. Utah Jazz star player
    7. Donovan Mitchell postseason performance
    8. NBA Western Conference
    9. Jazz vs Clippers series
    10. Donovan Mitchell MVP contender

    #Fact #Fiction #Donovan #Mitchells #moment

  • Dairy-Free Myths Debunked: Separating Fact from Fiction

    Dairy-Free Myths Debunked: Separating Fact from Fiction


    Dairy-Free Myths Debunked: Separating Fact from Fiction

    In recent years, there has been a growing trend towards dairy-free diets as people seek alternatives to traditional dairy products. However, there are many myths and misconceptions surrounding dairy-free diets that can lead to confusion and misinformation. In this article, we will debunk some of the most common dairy-free myths and separate fact from fiction.

    Myth #1: Dairy-Free Diets Lack Calcium

    One of the biggest concerns people have when going dairy-free is that they will not get enough calcium in their diet. While it is true that dairy products are a good source of calcium, there are many other non-dairy foods that are also rich in this essential mineral. Some examples include leafy green vegetables, almonds, tofu, and fortified plant-based milks. By incorporating these foods into your diet, you can easily meet your daily calcium requirements without consuming dairy.

    Myth #2: Dairy-Free Diets Are Bland and Boring

    Another common misconception about dairy-free diets is that they are restrictive and lacking in flavor. In reality, there are countless delicious dairy-free alternatives available that can easily replace traditional dairy products. From plant-based milks and yogurts to dairy-free cheeses and ice creams, there are plenty of options to choose from that are just as tasty and satisfying as their dairy counterparts. With a little creativity in the kitchen, you can enjoy a wide variety of flavorful and satisfying dairy-free meals and snacks.

    Myth #3: Dairy-Free Diets Are Only for Vegans

    While many vegans choose to follow a dairy-free diet, dairy intolerance and allergies are common reasons why people may opt to eliminate dairy from their diet. Lactose intolerance, in particular, affects a large portion of the population and can cause digestive issues such as bloating, gas, and diarrhea. Additionally, some people may have dairy allergies that can cause more severe reactions such as hives, swelling, and difficulty breathing. Dairy-free diets are not just for vegans – they can benefit anyone looking to improve their health and well-being.

    Myth #4: Dairy-Free Diets Are Expensive

    Some people believe that dairy-free diets are more expensive than traditional diets due to the cost of specialty products and ingredients. While it is true that some dairy-free alternatives may be pricier than their dairy counterparts, there are plenty of affordable options available as well. Simple swaps like using plant-based milks instead of cow’s milk or making your own dairy-free yogurt at home can help you save money while still enjoying a dairy-free diet. With a little planning and creativity, eating dairy-free can be both nutritious and budget-friendly.

    In conclusion, dairy-free diets are not as restrictive or challenging as many people believe. By debunking these common myths and separating fact from fiction, we can help dispel misconceptions surrounding dairy-free diets and encourage more people to explore the benefits of cutting dairy from their diet. Whether you are looking to improve your health, reduce your environmental impact, or simply try something new, a dairy-free diet can be a delicious and fulfilling choice for anyone.


    #DairyFree #Myths #Debunked #Separating #Fact #Fiction,dairy-free

  • The Legend of Weeliao Gunnir: Fact or Fiction?

    The Legend of Weeliao Gunnir: Fact or Fiction?


    The Legend of Weeliao Gunnir: Fact or Fiction?

    The Legend of Weeliao Gunnir is a tale that has been passed down through generations, captivating the imaginations of people from all walks of life. But the question remains: is this story based on true events, or is it simply a work of fiction?

    According to the legend, Weeliao Gunnir was a fearless warrior who roamed the lands in search of adventure and glory. Armed with a magical sword that was said to have been forged by the gods themselves, Weeliao was able to defeat any foe that crossed his path. His bravery and skill in battle made him a hero among his people, and his name was whispered with awe and reverence.

    But as with many legends, the story of Weeliao Gunnir is shrouded in mystery and speculation. Some believe that he was a real historical figure, a warrior who lived centuries ago and whose deeds were embellished over time. Others argue that he is nothing more than a myth, a character created to inspire and entertain.

    There are those who claim to have seen evidence of Weeliao’s existence, pointing to ancient artifacts and inscriptions that they believe are linked to the legendary warrior. However, skeptics argue that these findings are inconclusive and could be the result of misinterpretation or wishful thinking.

    Despite the debate over its authenticity, the Legend of Weeliao Gunnir continues to capture the hearts and minds of those who hear it. Whether fact or fiction, the story of this fearless warrior serves as a reminder of the power of courage and determination in the face of adversity.

    In the end, perhaps it doesn’t matter whether Weeliao Gunnir was a real person or simply a figment of someone’s imagination. What truly matters is the impact that his story has had on those who have heard it, inspiring them to be brave in the face of their own challenges and to never give up on their dreams.

    So whether you believe in the legend of Weeliao Gunnir or not, one thing is certain: his legacy lives on in the hearts of those who continue to tell his tale, keeping his memory alive for generations to come.


    #Legend #Weeliao #Gunnir #Fact #Fiction,weeliao gunnir

  • Jonathan Bennett Spills A Fun Fact About New Year’s Eve Confetti

    Jonathan Bennett Spills A Fun Fact About New Year’s Eve Confetti


    Jonathan Bennett is set to return as host for this year’s Times Square New Year’s Eve Celebration, which will be available for livestreaming online.

    The event promises an exciting lineup of musical performances, including Carrie Underwood, the Jonas Brothers, TLC, Rita Ora, and more. Additionally, Mickey Guyton will deliver a special rendition of John Lennon’s “Imagine” just before the iconic midnight ball drop.

    On his official Snapchat account, Jonathan Bennett will be going live to show fans the behind-the-scenes footage that you don’t get to see on the live broadcast.

    Jonathan Bennett Reveals The Confetti Is People’s Wishes

    Jonathan Bennett at Christmas Con Hosts Special Screening of Hallmark's "Groundswell"

    MEGA

    In an interview with People Magazine, the actor revealed his favorite aspect of celebrating New Year’s Eve in New York City—a surprising tidbit about the iconic confetti.

    “Every New Year’s Eve, when that confetti showers all the revelers, those are actually people’s wishes,” Bennett revealed. “You’re standing there, and you’re being showered in so many people’s wishes for the new year. There’s something just really special about that, and that’s what I love so much about New Year’s Eve in Times Square.”

    The Hallmark actor then told the outlet that “a new year is a symbol for a new beginning” and the confetti “is a symbol, a literal physical symbol, of everyone’s wishes for the new year.”

    “I think we always have wishes of hope, we have wishes of better days ahead, a better life, there’s so many wishes that people have for the new year,” he said. “So to have them just showered on top of you is just so special.”

    The ‘Mean Girls’ Alum Opens Up About The NYE Tradition

    Jonathan Bennett at Hallmark Channels Countdown To Christmas

    MEGA

    Bennett also explained that the Times Square Alliance and Countdown Entertainment, the organizations behind the iconic ball drop, play a key role in ensuring every wish finds its place on a piece of confetti. These wishes are gathered either from the “Wishing Wall” in Times Square or through submissions on the official event website.

    “They are so adamant about using real wishes and making sure that every wish that gets in that box makes it to the drop,” the actor added.

    Bennett Said One Of The Wishes ‘Almost Blew Away’

    Jonathan Bennett at Hallmark Channel's Countdown to Christmas Red Carpet and Holiday Celebration

    MEGA

    Reflecting on a memorable moment with Countdown Entertainment President Jeffrey A. Straus, Bennett shared an instance “when one of the wishes almost blew away.” He recalled saying, “I was like, ‘Oh, we almost lost that one,’ and Jeff immediately responded, ‘Get it back in the box.’ Bennett continued. “I looked at him, and he goes, ‘That’s someone’s wish.’”

    The actor added how important it is to people, “so if you write your wish down, it’ll make it to the drop. I think that’s what makes Times Square and New Year’s Eve so special.”

    More On NYE In Times Square

    Jellyroll at Dick Clark's New Year's Rockin' Eve With Ryan Seacrest 2024 Performances

    MEGA

    A star-studded lineup of performers is set to take the stage in New York City’s Times Square tonight as thousands of revelers gather to ring in 2025 and witness the iconic ball drop.

    The evening will feature a diverse mix of talent, including New York dance group AGNEW, country superstar Carrie Underwood, reggaeton artist De La Ghetto, Colombian singer Greeicy, global sensations the Jonas Brothers, rapper Kapo, singer-songwriter Mark Ambor, country artist Megan Moroney, pop star Sophie Ellis-Bextor, and the brass ensemble Triad Brass.

    Additionally, Mickey Guyton will deliver a special performance just ahead of midnight. Fans can also look forward to members of ’90s R&B legends TLC performing some of their biggest hits, including tracks from their groundbreaking 1994 album CrazySexyCool, during Dick Clark’s New Year’s Rockin’ Eve.

    With such an impressive lineup, the night promises to be an unforgettable celebration.

    New Year’s Eve Live: Nashville’s Big Bash

    Post Malone and Morgan Wallen at CMA Awards

    MEGA

    Some of country music’s biggest names are set to welcome the new year with performances on CBS’ New Year’s Eve Live: Nashville’s Big Bash. Airing from 8–10 p.m. EST/PST and resuming from 10:30 p.m.–1:30 a.m. EST/PST, the show will also be available for streaming on Paramount+.

    The star-studded lineup includes powerhouse performers like Chris Stapleton, Eric Church, Jelly Roll, Kane Brown, Katelyn Brown, Luke Combs, Miranda Lambert, Parker McCollum, Post Malone, and Shaboozey.

    With such an impressive mix of country legends and rising stars, Nashville’s Big Bash promises to deliver an unforgettable night of music and celebration to ring in the new year.



    In a recent interview, Jonathan Bennett revealed a fun fact about New Year’s Eve confetti that may surprise you! Did you know that the tradition of throwing confetti on New Year’s Eve dates back to ancient times? It was believed that the act of tossing small pieces of paper or other materials into the air would bring good luck and prosperity in the coming year. So, the next time you’re showered in confetti at a New Year’s Eve party, remember that you’re carrying on a tradition that has been celebrated for centuries! #NewYearsEve #ConfettiTradition #GoodLuckCharm

    Tags:

    Jonathan Bennett, New Year’s Eve, confetti, fun fact, celebration, holiday, party, tradition, entertainment, celebrity, reveal, surprise, entertainment news, pop culture.

    #Jonathan #Bennett #Spills #Fun #Fact #Years #Eve #Confetti

  • 1975 Dodge Colt Fact Data Book Brochure – Paint and Fabric Album – Mitsubishi GT

    1975 Dodge Colt Fact Data Book Brochure – Paint and Fabric Album – Mitsubishi GT



    1975 Dodge Colt Fact Data Book Brochure – Paint and Fabric Album – Mitsubishi GT

    Price : 69.95 – 55.96

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    Are you a fan of vintage cars? Do you love collecting old car brochures and memorabilia? If so, then you won’t want to miss out on this rare find – the 1975 Dodge Colt Fact Data Book Brochure.

    This brochure is a treasure trove of information about the 1975 Dodge Colt, including detailed specifications, features, and options available for this classic car. From engine details to interior features, this brochure has it all.

    One of the standout sections of this brochure is the Paint and Fabric Album, which showcases the various color options and fabric choices available for the 1975 Dodge Colt. From bold and vibrant hues to classic and understated tones, there’s something for every taste in this album.

    And if you’re a fan of the Mitsubishi GT, you’ll be thrilled to find detailed information about this model in the brochure as well. Learn about the performance capabilities, design features, and more that make the Mitsubishi GT a standout choice for car enthusiasts.

    Don’t miss out on this opportunity to own a piece of automotive history with the 1975 Dodge Colt Fact Data Book Brochure. Add it to your collection today and immerse yourself in the world of vintage cars and classic automobiles.
    #Dodge #Colt #Fact #Data #Book #Brochure #Paint #Fabric #Album #Mitsubishi, Data Fabric

  • Fact You’re The Best Travel Agent Than Most Will Ever Be: Perfect Gift for Travel Agents – One-Year Undated Weekly and Monthly Work Calendar Planner with To-Do List to Plan and Organize Your Work Day

    Fact You’re The Best Travel Agent Than Most Will Ever Be: Perfect Gift for Travel Agents – One-Year Undated Weekly and Monthly Work Calendar Planner with To-Do List to Plan and Organize Your Work Day


    Price: $7.99
    (as of Dec 20,2024 18:41:09 UTC – Details)




    ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08DSSCR14
    Publisher ‏ : ‎ Independently published (July 30, 2020)
    Language ‏ : ‎ English
    Paperback ‏ : ‎ 124 pages
    ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 979-8670785730
    Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 13.6 ounces
    Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 8.5 x 0.28 x 11 inches


    Are you a travel agent looking to stay organized and on top of your game? Look no further than this one-year undated weekly and monthly work calendar planner with a to-do list!

    As a travel agent, staying organized and managing your time effectively is key to success. This planner allows you to plan and organize your work day, week, and month with ease. With ample space for notes and to-do lists, you can keep track of important tasks and stay on top of deadlines.

    Whether you’re juggling multiple client bookings, researching travel destinations, or coordinating itineraries, this planner is the perfect tool to help you stay on track and meet your goals.

    So why settle for being an average travel agent when you can be the best? Invest in this planner and take your travel agency to the next level. Get ready to impress your clients and exceed their expectations with your impeccable organization and planning skills. Order yours today and start planning for success!
    #Fact #Youre #Travel #Agent #Perfect #Gift #Travel #Agents #OneYear #Undated #Weekly #Monthly #Work #Calendar #Planner #ToDo #List #Plan #Organize #Work #Day

Chat Icon