Zion Tech Group

Tag: firings

  • Senior FBI official forcefully resisted Trump administration firings


    Acting FBI Director Brian Driscoll on Friday refused a Justice Department order that he assist in the firing of agents involved in Jan. 6 riot cases, pushing back so forcefully that some FBI officials feared he would be dismissed, multiple current and former FBI officials told NBC News.

    The Justice Department ultimately did not dismiss Driscoll, the head of the bureau’s Newark field office who is temporarily serving as its acting director.

    The Senate is currently considering whether Kash Patel, President Trump’s pick for FBI director, should be confirmed. A longtime critic of the bureau’s investigations of Trump and Jan. 6th rioters, Patel promised Senators at his confirmation hearing that no FBI officials would be retaliated against.

    President-elect Donald Trump and Kash Patel, his pick to lead the FBI, during the Army-Navy football game at Northwest Stadium in Landover, Md., Dec. 14, 2024.
    President-elect Donald Trump and Kash Patel, his pick to lead the FBI, during the Army-Navy football game at Northwest Stadium in Landover, Md., on Dec. 14, 2024. Doug Mills / The New York Times/Redux

    “All FBI employees will be protected against political retribution,” Patel said under oath on Thursday.

    Just over 24 hours later, Driscoll notified the FBI workforce that he had been ordered to remove eight senior FBI executives by Emil Bove, the acting Deputy Attorney General and Trump’s former personal defense lawyer.

    Driscoll also said he had been told to turn over the names of every FBI employee involved in investigating Jan. 6 rioters.

    Driscoll stated that the eight executives had been forced out but did not say whether he would turn over the broader list of Jan. 6-related FBI investigators — a list that he noted encompasses thousands of FBI employees, including him. 

    A former member of the FBI’s elite hostage rescue team, Driscoll promised agents that he would follow the law and existing FBI policies.

    “As we’ve said since the moment we agreed to take on these roles, we are going to follow the law, follow FBI policy, and do what’s in the best interest of the workforce and the American people — always,” he wrote.

    In a message that circulated widely among bureau personnel, an FBI agent summarized what happened as: “Bottom line — DOJ came over and wanted to fire a bunch of J6 agents. Driscoll is an absolute stud. Held his ground and told WH proxy, DOJ, to F— Off.”

    The FBI and the Justice Department declined to comment. A senior FBI official disputed the accounts of the current and former officials saying, “It’s not true.”

    A former FBI official who knows Driscoll well said, “He pushed back hard.”

    Agents who worked on Jan. 6 cases targeted

    It’s not known whether anyone other than the eight senior FBI executives have been separated from the bureau. One official familiar with the matter said that top Trump administration officials have made it clear that they want at least some of the FBI agents who pursued Jan. 6 cases to be fired, just as multiple DOJ prosecutors involved with the Jan. 6 prosecutions were fired.

    The official said the Trump administration wants this to happen quickly but has been told by FBI officials that misconduct allegations at the bureau involve a formal review process.

    The accounts of Driscoll’s actions shed new light on a chaotic series of events over the last 48 hours that began with the news that the Trump administration was seeking to purge the top ranks of the FBI’s career civil servants.

    “Late this afternoon, I received a memo from the acting Deputy Attorney General notifying me that eight senior FBI executives are to be terminated by specific dates, unless these employees have retired beforehand,” Driscoll wrote. “I have been personally in touch with each of these impacted employees.”

    He said in the memo that he had also been directed to provide the DOJ by noon on Tuesday a list of all FBI employees involved in Capitol riot cases, and also those involved in a case against a Hamas leader. 

    No one contacted by NBC News had a sense of the new administration’s interest in the Hamas case, but the focus on Jan. 6 was clear. The Trump administration apparently believes that all of the Jan. 6 cases should not have been brought.

    Since it was the largest criminal investigation in U.S. history, thousands of FBI personnel were involved, as Driscoll acknowledged in his memo.

    “We understand that this request encompasses thousands of employees across the country who have supported these investigative efforts,” he wrote. “I am one of those employees, as is acting Deputy Director (Rob) Kissane.”

    FBI agents work the scene of a shooting at a Fourth of July parade on July 5, 2022, in Highland Park, Ill.
    FBI agents work the scene of a shooting at a Fourth of July parade on July 5, 2022, in Highland Park, Ill.Jim Vondruska / Getty Images

    FBI agents encouraged

    FBI agents were heartened by Driscoll’s memo, a source said, which many saw as an attempt by Driscoll to make the workforce and the public aware of what he was being asked to do.

    “He was trying to do right by the workforce,” one person familiar with the thinking of agents told NBC News. “He’s putting it in writing and naming names.”

    A separate DOJ memo obtained by NBC News identified the employees who were forced out. 

    The list included four top FBI managers: Robert Wells, who oversaw the national security branch; Ryan Young, of the intelligence branch; Robert Nordwall, of criminal and cyber response; Jackie Maguire, of science and technology. All of those people were eligible to retire and many of them did so.

    The memo also identified two heads of field offices, Jeffrey Veltri in Miami and David Sundberg in Washington, D.C.

    Also on the list was Dena Perkins, an acting section chief in the security division who was involved in a controversial disciplinary proceeding against a conservative FBI agent.

    The list did not include Spencer Evans, the special agent in charge in Las Vegas, who sent a message to colleagues on Friday that he was being dismissed by FBI headquarters. “I was given no rationale for this decision, which, as you might imagine, has come as a shock.” It’s unclear whether he has now been given a reprieve.

    Nor did the list include executive assistant director Arlene Gaylord, a 33-year FBI veteran who was not retirement-eligible and requested that she be allowed to work in another assignment until she did so. An FBI official familiar with the matter said she had been accommodated.

    Experts say the firings are illegal

    Legal experts said that few, if any, of the firings carried out so far by the Trump administration have been legal under civil service laws because the employees were not afforded due process.

    The Trump White House argues, though, that the president has the absolute right to fire anyone he wishes in the executive branch. The Supreme Court has ruled that federal employees have a right to a hearing before they are disciplined or terminated.

    Joyce Vance, a former U.S. attorney and NBC News legal contributor, called the firings illegal.

    “Career federal employees can be fired for conduct or performance issues, not because they failed to demonstrate political loyalty to the current incumbent of the White House,” said Vance. “Trump ignored controlling law and regulations to do this, and unless the Supreme Court changes their interpretation, any firing of permanent members of the civil service should not stand.”

    Even if some of the employees sue and win, they said their public service careers have been irreparably damaged, if not ended.

    One of the Jan. 6 prosecutors fired on Friday told NBC News that they “did nothing wrong” and had no regrets about their work. The person, who asked not to named due to fear of retaliation, said it was discouraging to be fired after seeing Trump pardon violent rioters who attacked police officers. 

    “We’ve all been looking over our shoulders, like, ‘Is this the day that we’re gonna get fired?’ Because we were doing our jobs?” the fired prosecutor told NBC News. “We’ve been forced to dismiss all of the cases that we’ve been working on of all these people that were very violent offenders. It’s been awful.”

    Current and former FBI agents say the purge at the bureau has had a shattering effect on the morale, sending a message that agents who work on cases that anger someone in the Trump administration could be targeted.

    “Who right now would want to work on a case that would get them crosswise with the administration?” one former FBI official asked. “They will come after you.”



    A senior FBI official has come forward to reveal that they forcefully resisted the Trump administration’s attempts to fire several high-ranking officials within the bureau. The official, who requested to remain anonymous, stated that they were appalled by the administration’s blatant disregard for the rule of law and the independence of the FBI.

    According to the official, the Trump administration sought to remove key figures within the FBI who were actively investigating connections between the president’s campaign and Russia. The official described these firings as a blatant attempt to obstruct justice and undermine the integrity of the FBI.

    Despite facing pressure from the administration to comply with these firings, the senior FBI official stood their ground and refused to participate in what they believed to be an unlawful and unethical act. Their courageous actions ultimately helped to protect the independence and integrity of the FBI during a time of intense political turmoil.

    The revelation of this resistance highlights the ongoing challenges faced by government officials who are tasked with upholding the rule of law in the face of political interference. It serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining the independence and integrity of law enforcement agencies in order to ensure accountability and justice for all.

    Tags:

    1. Senior FBI official
    2. Trump administration
    3. Firings
    4. Resistance
    5. FBI
    6. Government
    7. Trump
    8. Administration
    9. Political news
    10. Current events

    #Senior #FBI #official #forcefully #resisted #Trump #administration #firings

  • Trump’s Firings Could Bring Court Cases That Expand His Power


    President Trump abruptly fired dozens of officials in the past few days — including inspectors general, a member of the National Labor Relations Board and career prosecutors — in ways that apparently violated federal laws, setting up the possibility of lawsuits.

    But the prospect of getting dragged into court may be exactly what Mr. Trump’s lawyers are hoping for. There is a risk that judges may determine that some of the dismissals were illegal, but any rulings in the president’s favor would establish precedents that would expand presidential power to control the federal government.

    Some legal experts say the purges underway appear to be custom-made opportunities for the Supreme Court’s Republican-appointed majority to strike down the statutes any legal challenges would be based on, furthering its trend in recent years of expanding presidential authority.

    “On one level, this seems designed to invite courts to push back because much of it is illegal and the overall message is a boundless view of executive power,” said Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard law professor who led the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel in the Bush administration. “But really, they are clearly setting up test cases.”

    Five of the nine Supreme Court justices worked as executive branch lawyers during the Reagan and George W. Bush administrations. Their legal teams were both defined by an expansive view of executive power, including developing theories of the Constitution that would invalidate congressional restrictions on the White House.

    The Reagan legal team, for example, created the so-called unitary executive theory. It holds that the president must wield exclusive control of the executive branch, so laws passed by Congress that give independence to other officials are unconstitutional. A key application is that presidents must be able to fire any executive branch official at will.

    In recent years, the Supreme Court’s majority — led by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who worked in the White House Counsel’s Office under the Reagan administration — has pushed that idea.

    Against that backdrop, a series of Mr. Trump’s dismissals — and an executive order making it easier to summarily fire certain career officials — could give the court’s majority an opportunity to strike down additional statutes that restrict presidential removal powers.

    The early days of Mr. Trump’s return to office show that he has reveled in a maximalist show of force, and his firings have come in the teeth of various federal laws.

    For example, when Mr. Trump conducted a mass purge of more than a dozen inspectors general on Friday, he defied a statute that requires giving a written notice to Congress with a “substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons” at least 30 days in advance.

    In a letter to Mr. Trump on Tuesday, Senator Charles Grassley, Republican of Iowa and the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, requested a detailed explanation of his actions given that the president did not obey the statute’s notice requirement.

    “While I.G.s aren’t immune from committing acts requiring their removal, and they can be removed by the president, the law must be followed,” the letter said, which was also signed by the ranking Democrat on the panel, Senator Richard Durbin of Illinois.

    Several of those officials have discussed filing a lawsuit seeking an injunction and a declaration that their removals were illegal. But such a case would give the Trump administration an opportunity to argue that the statute protecting inspectors general is an unconstitutional constraint on the president’s powers.

    Days after the firings of inspectors general, Mr. Trump kneecapped at least three independent agencies, the National Labor Relations Board, the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. By firing Democratic members, he left each without enough members to legally act.

    Gwynne Wilcox, who was ousted from the National Labor Relations Board, has suggested that she may challenge the move, saying, “Since this is unprecedented, and I believe illegal, I want to see what my options are.”

    The law creating the labor board makes it independent of the White House in part by restricting a president’s ability to fire its members at will, like ordinary political appointees. It says, “Any member of the board may be removed by the president, upon notice and hearing, for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office, but for no other cause.”

    Ms. Wilcox received no such hearing and does not appear to be accused of any misconduct. So a lawsuit seeking to vindicate the job protections Congress gave to the position would raise the question of whether those statutory limits are constitutional.

    Any legal fight over the firings at the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission would be more complicated because the statutes creating them do not explicitly limit a president’s ability to eject its board members only to a cause like misconduct.

    But there has been a general understanding that such officials are also shielded by implicit protections that allow for removal only for cause. For example, the statute for another independent agency, the Securities and Exchange Commission, also lacks such a clause, but in a 2010 case, the Supreme Court assumed, without actually deciding, that it implicitly exists as a limit.

    Any challenge to the ousters at the privacy board and employment commission would squarely raise the question of whether such implicit limits actually exist as a restraint on the president’s removal powers — and if so, whether they are constitutional.

    Mr. Trump is also testing legal protections for career federal workers that restrict the ability of his political appointees to fire them at will and without a just cause. Those include members of the Senior Executive Service, the upper echelon of career employees, and members of the civil service. Both have a right to hearings before the Merit Systems Protection Board and then to go to court.

    Under one of Mr. Trump’s executive orders, known as “Schedule F,” job protections shielding tens of thousands of senior career federal workers would be eliminated, making it easier to replace them with loyalists. He issued a similar order at the end of his first term, but President Joseph R. Biden Jr. took office and rescinded it.

    The Trump administration summarily fired more than a dozen Justice Department prosecutors who had been assigned to help investigate Mr. Trump.

    A memo to the fired prosecutors from the acting attorney general, James McHenry, suggested that perceived loyalty was a factor: “Given your significant role in prosecuting the president, I do not believe that the leadership of the department can trust you to assist in implementing the president’s agenda faithfully,” he wrote.

    As purported legal authority for the firing, Mr. McHenry cited Mr. Trump’s constitutional powers and “the laws of the United States,” while also pointing out that ousted prosecutors could challenge their removal by appealing to the merit board.

    Should any one of them follow that advice, of course, that would set in motion yet another legal test of Congress’s ability to impose checks and balances on the presidency.

    “We’re going to find out a lot about Chief Justice Roberts’s ultimate commitments,” Professor Goldsmith said.



    President Trump’s recent firings of several high-ranking officials, including Defense Secretary Mark Esper and cybersecurity chief Christopher Krebs, have raised concerns about the potential for legal battles that could ultimately expand his power.

    These firings have sparked outrage among critics who see them as politically motivated attempts to consolidate power and retain control over key government agencies. As a result, there is speculation that legal challenges could arise, challenging the president’s authority to make such dismissals.

    One potential legal battle could involve the interpretation of the Vacancies Reform Act, which outlines the procedures for filling vacant positions within the executive branch. If Trump’s appointments to these positions are challenged in court, it could set a precedent for future administrations and potentially expand the president’s power to make unilateral decisions regarding personnel appointments.

    Additionally, there is concern that these firings could lead to court cases challenging the president’s authority to conduct foreign policy and national security matters without proper oversight from Congress. With key positions in the Department of Defense and cybersecurity now held by acting officials, there is a risk that decisions made by these individuals could be challenged in court, further expanding the president’s power in these areas.

    Overall, Trump’s firings have raised serious concerns about the potential for legal battles that could ultimately expand his power. It will be important for both Congress and the courts to closely monitor these developments and ensure that the president does not overstep his authority in these critical areas.

    Tags:

    1. Trump firings
    2. Court cases
    3. Executive power
    4. Legal challenges
    5. Presidential authority
    6. Government dismissals
    7. Trump administration
    8. Political controversies
    9. Legal battles
    10. White House firings

    #Trumps #Firings #Bring #Court #Cases #Expand #Power

  • Trump touts political firings and retribution as he begins a government overhaul in his image




    CNN
     — 

    President Donald Trump’s political retribution tour began this week with firings of his perceived enemies inside the federal government, the targeting of former intelligence and national security officials and a directive to investigate actions by the Biden administration.

    Trump and his team wasted little time reassigning nearly two dozen senior Justice Department officials and dismissing career DOJ officials who oversee the nation’s immigration courts, State Department diplomats and the commandant of the Coast Guard.

    Trump also pulled the Secret Service detail for his former national security adviser, John Bolton, and the security clearances for 51 people who spoke out during the 2020 Hunter Biden investigation.

    The actions are all part of an initial wave of Trump’s efforts to remove the so-called “deep state” from the federal government, as he and his team have pledged to ensure those working inside the government are loyal to the president. Trump has long complained that he was undermined by anti-Trump officials across the federal workforce in his first administration, particularly from the Justice Department and the intelligence community.

    Some of the turnover between administrations, especially with a different political party taking charge, is perfectly normal. Presidents typically replace US attorneys across the country, for instance.

    But Trump has also made a show of the firings he’s carried out, taking to his social media to boast about removing more than 1,000 Biden administration political appointees – and to announce the removal of four individuals from presidential advisory boards, including prominent critics such as former Joint Chiefs Chairman Mark Milley and José Andrés, the celebrity chef and restaurateur.

    “Our first day in the White House is not over yet! My Presidential Personnel Office is actively in the process of identifying and removing over a thousand Presidential Appointees from the previous Administration, who are not aligned with our vision to Make America Great Again,” Trump wrote in a 12:28 a.m. Truth Social post Tuesday.

    Trump’s first wave of executive actions targeted the federal workforce broadly by making it easier to fire government employees – though his executive order is already being challenged in court.

    Along with the firings of federal workers, Trump took other actions to go after his perceived enemies from outside the government.

    Two of Trump’s executive orders directed the Justice Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to open broad investigations into Biden administration “censorship of free speech” or “weaponization” of law enforcement and intelligence agencies.

    Former President Joe Biden issued a wave of pardons in the final hours of his presidency to former House January 6 Committee members and members of his family, which he said were intended to prevent Trump from launching politically motivated investigations.

    Another of Trump’s executive orders revoked the security clearances of 51 former intelligence officials who signed a 2020 letter arguing that emails from a laptop belonging to Hunter Biden carried “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”

    That executive order also revoked the security clearance of Bolton, who left the White House in November 2019 after serving as Trump’s national security adviser and has since become a Trump critic. In addition, Trump terminated the Secret Service detail that was assigned to Bolton within hours of taking office, Bolton confirmed to CNN Tuesday.

    Bolton has required ongoing Secret Service protection after he left government because of threats against him from Iran. Trump initially terminated his protection after he left his administration in the first term, but Biden had restored it.

    In his inaugural address, Trump claimed he would end the weaponization of the justice system: “Never again will the immense power of the state be weaponized to persecute political opponents – something I know something about.”

    “We will not allow that to happen. It will not happen again,” Trump said.

    But in a more free-wheeling address to supporters inside the US Capitol Visitor Center that followed Monday, the president complained about Biden’s pardons while claiming again that his critics, including former January 6 Committee member Liz Cheney, had broken the law.

    More dismissals could be coming, too. A memo from Trump’s Office of Personnel Management to the acting heads of the federal agencies directed them to assess their employees who have been hired in the last year – while reminding them that those workers can be fired more easily.

    “Generally, employees in the competitive service with less than one year of service, and in the excepted service with less than two years of service, can be terminated without triggering MSPB appeal rights,” said the memo, obtained by CNN, referring to the Merit Systems Protection Board.

    Early moves at DOJ and FBI

    Many of the high-profile dismissals on Day 1 of the second Trump presidency came from inside law enforcement.

    New acting leaders at the Justice Department moved quickly to shuffle at least 20 career officials, according to sources. Those include senior lawyers in the national security division, which in the past has been insulated from shifting political winds, and international affairs, which works on extraditions and immigration matters, the sources said.

    Paul Abbate, the deputy FBI director, announced Monday morning he was retiring effective immediately. Abbate was already at the FBI’s mandatory retirement age, but former Director Chris Wray – who himself had resigned this month after Trump had vowed to fire him years before his term ended – gave Abbate an extension to continue working through April to ensure a smooth transition.

    There’s now a leadership vacuum atop the FBI. Senior FBI special agent Brian Driscoll, the special agent in charge of the Newark Field Office, was named acting director on Monday. The Trump administration has promised to overhaul the FBI, starting with appointing ally Kash Patel as director. Trump’s team has also weighed plans to install a political appointee into the deputy director position, which traditionally has been a career FBI agent, CNN has previously reported.

    The director of the Bureau of Prisons, Colette Peters, “separated” from the bureau Monday, the BOP said in a statement. She had served in the position for two and a half years and faced extreme difficulty with staffing shortages and institutions in disrepair. Deputy Director William Lathrop is now acting director.

    bolton0.jpg

    Kaitlan Collins shares response Bolton gave to Trump stripping him of his security detail

    02:20

    Both the chief judge and the general counsel of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, the nation’s immigration court system, were also asked to leave Monday. Their positions are now listed as vacant on the Justice Department website.

    And the acting US attorney in Washington DC, Bridget Fitzpatrick, was also relieved of her position atop the office Monday. Fitzpatrick will stay at the US attorney’s office, but is being replaced as the top official by Ed Martin, a hardline, socially conservative activist and commentator.

    Martin was an organizer with the “Stop the Steal” movement and was involved in the financing of the January 6 rally on the Ellipse that occurred directly before the attack on the Capitol. He has also publicly advocated for a national abortion ban without exceptions for rape or incest and has raised imposing criminal penalties on women and doctors involved in abortions.

    Some prosecutors involved in January 6 cases said that Martin’s temporary appointment was demoralizing, with one calling it a “thumb in the eye.”

    Inside the Justice Department, some career officials worried that their jobs may also be at risk. One official told CNN that they were working from home Tuesday because they were “keeping their head down” and “trying to stay employed.”

    “I guess I am the only one who didn’t get pardoned,” another joked.

    Other officials expressed concerns that they didn’t know who was coming in to run the criminal, civil, national security, and civil rights offices at the Justice Department on an acting basis, describing to CNN that they felt “in the dark” about temporary leadership.

    Still, several DOJ employees said they were optimistic about Trump’s pick for attorney general Pam Bondi officially starting the job once confirmed by the Senate. Bondi’s history as Florida attorney general gave them hope for a steady leader, officials said.

    Dismissals in Coast Guard and State Department

    One of the most high-profile departures this week came from inside the military, where the commandant of the US Coast Guard, Adm. Linda Fagan, was removed from her position over “failure to address border security threats” and “excessive focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion policies,” a Department of Homeland Security official confirmed to CNN on Tuesday.

    At the State Department, where newly confirmed Secretary of State Marco Rubio was sworn in Tuesday, more than a dozen career officials serving in senior roles were asked to step down from their roles, multiple sources familiar with the matter told CNN.

    Many received the request prior to Monday’s inauguration. They had been serving in top posts for both management and policy as well as assistant secretaries of state, the sources said, and some were among the senior-most diplomats at the State Department.

    Although it is typical for an incoming administration to appoint its own officials to senior roles, current career officials often stay while the appointees await Senate confirmation. Moreover, the scope and speed has raised alarm bells.

    This is “almost certainly the first step toward a major purge and takeover of the career foreign service,” a former senior diplomat said.

    Speaking to State Department staff on Tuesday, Rubio there would be “changes” at the State Department, but that they are not meant to be “punitive” or “destructive.”

    “The changes will be because we need to be a 21st century agency that can move by – a cliche that’s used by many – at the speed of relevance,” Rubio said.

    CNN’s Priscilla Alvarez, Natasha Bertrand, Kaitlan Collins, Jennifer Hansler, Katie Bo Lillis, Tami Luhby, Rene Marsh and Michael Williams contributed to this report.



    President Trump has begun a government overhaul in his image, touting political firings and retribution as he seeks to shape his administration to his liking. In a series of recent tweets and public statements, Trump has made it clear that he is not afraid to remove those who do not align with his agenda and replace them with individuals who will.

    This move comes as no surprise to those who have followed Trump’s presidency, as he has often prioritized loyalty and personal loyalty over experience and expertise. From the firing of FBI Director James Comey to the removal of various high-ranking officials in his administration, Trump has shown a willingness to make bold and controversial decisions in order to surround himself with individuals who share his worldview.

    Critics have raised concerns about the potential consequences of Trump’s actions, warning that such a purge of government officials could have a detrimental impact on the functioning of the government and its ability to effectively serve the American people. However, Trump remains undeterred, insisting that he is simply taking the necessary steps to ensure that his administration reflects his vision for the country.

    As Trump continues to reshape the government in his image, it remains to be seen what the long-term implications of his actions will be. But one thing is clear: Trump is determined to put his stamp on the government, no matter the cost.

    Tags:

    Trump, political firings, government overhaul, retribution, Trump administration, political changes, government restructuring, White House shakeup, political appointments, Trump policies

    #Trump #touts #political #firings #retribution #begins #government #overhaul #image

  • Trump’s first day in White House includes infrastructure announcement, firings


    Trump planned to continue to build on his barrage of Inauguration Day announcements, with the White House promising a “massive announcement” on infrastructure.

    WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump is spending his first full day back in the White House meeting with congressional leaders, announcing an investment in artificial intelligence infrastructure and demonstrating one of his favored expressions of power: firing people.

    The new president posted on his Truth social media network early Tuesday that he would fire more than 1,000 presidential appointees “who are not aligned with our vision,” including some high-profile names.

    Trump fired chef and humanitarian Jose Andres from the President’s Council on Sports, Fitness and Nutrition, retired Gen. Mark Milley from the National Infrastructure Advisory Council, former State Department official Brian Hook from the board of the Wilson Center and former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms from the President’s Export Council.

    “YOU’RE FIRED!” Trump said in his post — his catchphrase from his reality TV show, “The Apprentice.”

    Former President Joe Biden also removed many Trump appointees in his first days in office, including former press secretary Sean Spicer from the board overseeing the U.S. Naval Academy.

    Trump was set to continue building on his barrage of Inauguration Day announcements on Tuesday with plans to announce a new partnership to invest in artificial intelligence.

    Three major business leaders — SoftBank Group CEO Masayoshi Son, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Oracle Corp. Chairman Larry Ellison — were scheduled to join Trump in the afternoon to announce the creation of a new company called Stargate, which would invest up to $500 billion over the next four years in AI infrastructure, according to the White House.

    Stargate intends to start building the project in Texas.

    Trump also attended a national prayer service Tuesday morning at Washington National Cathedral, a customary visit for new presidents and one that will wrap up his four days of inauguration-related events.

    One of the speakers at the interfaith service, the Right Rev. Mariann Budde, the Episcopal bishop of Washington, used her sermon to send a message to Trump, urging compassion for LGBTQ+ people and undocumented migrant workers.

    “You have felt the providential hand of a loving God. In the name of our God, I ask you to have mercy on the people in our country who are scared now,” said Budde, who has criticized Trump before.

    Asked afterward by a reporter what he thought of the service, Trump said: “Not too exciting was it. I didn’t think it was a good service. They could do much better.”

    Later in the day, the president was expected to meet with House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune and other GOP legislators. It’s the first formal sit-down for the GOP leadership teams, including House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Senate GOP Whip John Barrasso and the new president, as they chart priorities for using Republican power in Washington.

    Despite an ambitious 100-day agenda, the Republican-led Congress is not on the same page on some ideas and strategies as they rush to deliver tax cuts for the wealthy, mass deportations and other goals for Trump.

    Trump used the first hours of his presidency on Monday to sign a series of executive orders and memorandums, moving quickly to show that his new hold on the U.S. government would be a stark change from his predecessor.

    He pardoned hundreds of people for their roles in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, withdrew the U.S. from the Paris climate accords and the World Health Organization, began his immigration crackdown by declaring a national emergency at the U.S.-Mexico border and sought to end automatic citizenship for anyone born in America, which is expected to run into constitutional challenges.

    He also signed an order that intends to pause a ban on TikTok for 75 days to give its China-based parent company more time to find an approved buyer.



    On his first day in the White House, President Trump wasted no time in making waves with a major infrastructure announcement and a series of high-profile firings.

    In a press conference held in the Oval Office, Trump declared his intention to launch a massive infrastructure revitalization program, promising to rebuild America’s roads, bridges, and airports. The announcement was met with both praise and skepticism, with critics questioning how the plan would be funded and implemented.

    But it wasn’t just infrastructure that was on the agenda for Trump’s first day. The President also made headlines with a series of high-profile firings, including several top officials in the Department of Justice and the Environmental Protection Agency. Trump cited a need for a fresh start and a desire to shake up the status quo as reasons for the dismissals.

    The flurry of activity on Trump’s first day in office set the tone for what promises to be a controversial and eventful presidency. With infrastructure plans in motion and a new team taking shape, the Trump administration is already making a bold statement about its priorities and intentions.

    Tags:

    1. President Trump
    2. White House
    3. Infrastructure announcement
    4. Firings
    5. Trump administration
    6. Government news
    7. Political updates
    8. White House activities
    9. Trump policies
    10. Political developments

    #Trumps #day #White #House #includes #infrastructure #announcement #firings

Chat Icon