Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: Government
Google Maps to show Gulf of America after government updates
The Gulf of Mexico as seen on Google Maps.
Source: Google Maps
Google said Monday it will change the name of the Gulf of Mexico to “Gulf of America” in Google Maps after the Trump administration updates its “official government sources.”
The company also said it will start using the name “Mount McKinley” for the mountain in Alaska currently called Denali.
Last week, President Donald Trump signed executive actions that included an order to make the name changes on official maps and federal communications.
“We’ve received a few questions about naming within Google Maps,” the company said in an X post. “We have a longstanding practice of applying name changes when they have been updated in official government sources.”
Google added that the name Gulf of Mexico will remain displayed for users in Mexico. Users in other countries will see both names, the company said.
Trump said he will restore former President William McKinley’s name to the mountain. He said McKinley made the country “very rich” through tariffs and talent.
The mountain was named Mount McKinley until 2015, when President Barack Obama’s administration changed it to Denali as a symbolic gesture to Alaska Natives.
WATCH: President Trump ‘not afraid to go big’ on tariff threats
Government updates have finally been implemented on Google Maps, providing users with a more accurate depiction of the Gulf of America. The Gulf is now clearly defined and easily distinguishable, allowing for better navigation and exploration of this beautiful region. Check out the updated Google Maps to see the Gulf of America in all its glory! #GoogleMaps #GulfofAmerica #GovernmentUpdates
Tags:
- Google Maps
- Gulf of America
- Government updates
- Navigation
- Mapping technology
- Geographic information
- Gulf of Mexico
- Coastal changes
- Environmental updates
- Satellite imagery
#Google #Maps #show #Gulf #America #government #updates
Trump ordered the U.S. government to lower prices for Americans. Can he deliver?
President Trump, who while campaigning vowed to end the “inflation nightmare,” on Monday signaled his focus on the high cost of living in the U.S. by signing an executive order that requires “all executive departments and agencies to deliver emergency price relief” to Americans.
Mr. Trump’s Jan. 20 order blames several factors for the pandemic-era inflation surge that has left many households feeling financially pinched, including high federal spending under the Biden administration and costs from new regulations.
“It is critical to restore purchasing power to the American family and improve our quality of life,” the executive order states.
To accomplish that, Mr. Trump is ordering the departments and agencies that fall under the executive branch, including the departments of Commerce, Health and Human Services, Labor, and Energy, to take actions that lower prices for everything from housing and health costs to food and fuel.
There’s a lot riding on Mr. Trump’s mandate given that U.S. voters last fall consistently ranked the economy and inflation as among their top issues. But whether Mr. Trump’s order will meaningfully move the needle on inflation is uncertain, some economists say.
“Trump’s cost of living order fails to address the root causes of inflation, namely corporate profiteering and broken supply chains,” said Lindsay Owens, executive director of the Groundwork Collaborative, a progressive economic think tank. “This order is a talking point, not a plan.”
Recent economic research from the likes of Ben Bernanke, the former Federal Reserve chairman, has found that spiking prices in 2021 and 2022 stemmed from factors such as supply-chain disruptions and increased commodity prices — forces that any president, including Mr. Trump, would struggle to control.
The Trump administration didn’t immediately return a request for comment.
In the meantime, inflation has cooled dramatically since reaching a 40-year high in June 2022, although the consumer price index remains stubbornly above the Federal Reserve’s goal of a 2% annual rate. While prices are rising more slowly, more than 4 in 10 Americans express pessimism about their own economic prospects over the next year due to the ongoing impact of inflation, Bankrate found in a December survey.
Mr. Trump’s plan: Deregulation, cheaper housing and more
Mr. Trump’s order targeting prices highlights several areas for federal departments to focus on, including reducing the number of federal regulations that Trump administration officials argue has driven up the cost of living for American families.
“In sum, unprecedented regulatory oppression from the Biden administration is estimated to have imposed almost $50,000 in costs on the average American household,” the order states.
That refers to an analysis from University of Chicago economist Casey Mulligan, whose research found that the Biden administration’s regulations may over time add a total of about $47,000 in added costs per household. Fuel emission rules from the Obama and Biden administrations are also forecast to boost the cost of vehicles by $6,000 each, Mulligan estimated.
But eliminating federal regulations that protect workers and consumers won’t lower the cost of living, Owens said. Americans have been struggling with cost-of-living issues for decades, ranging from soaring health care costs to rising housing prices — trends rooted in structural problems such as a shortage of available housing and the nation’s complex for-profit health care system.
To be sure, Mr. Trump nodded to some of those issues in his order, requiring federal departments to “lower the cost of housing and expand housing supply” and “eliminate unnecessary administrative expenses and rent-seeking practices that increase health care costs.”
While those are ambitious goals, tackling housing costs is notoriously difficult given that new construction is often constrained by state and local laws, from zoning restrictions to environmental regulations — issues over which the federal government is unlikely to have much leverage.
Lowering medical costs could help American households, which spend more on health care than any other developed nation. Yet Mr. Trump also signed an executive order on Jan. 20 that revokes a Biden administration effort to lower prescription costs, which is seemingly at odds with his cost-of-living directive.
Separately, Mr. Trump also signed a separate executive order on Jan. 20 declaring a national energy emergency, part of his administration’s plan to ramp up domestic energy production and lower costs.
“The inflation crisis was caused by massive overspending and escalating energy prices,” Trump said on Monday. “And that is why today I will also declare a national energy emergency. We will drill, baby, drill.”
Mr. Trump is likely to have some convincing to do that he has a recipe for lowering prices. In a recent poll by CBS News, roughly 40% of people said they expected grocery prices to drop under the Trump administration, while 37% thought costs would rise.
Another survey, from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, revealed less confidence on the direction of prices: 2 in 10 Americans said they are “extremely” or “very” confident that Mr. Trump will be able to make progress on lowering the cost of groceries, housing or health care this year.
In an interview with Time Magazine, which named him 2024 Person of the Year, Mr. Trump acknowledged that bringing down food costs will be a difficult challenge.
“I’d like to bring them down. It’s hard to bring things down once they’re up. You know, it’s very hard. But I think that they will,” he said.
President Trump made headlines today by issuing an executive order directing the U.S. government to lower prices for Americans. The order aims to tackle rising costs of goods and services, particularly in healthcare and prescription drugs.While this move has been praised by some as a step towards making essential goods more affordable for the average American, others are skeptical of whether Trump can actually deliver on this promise. Past attempts to lower drug prices have faced resistance from pharmaceutical companies and lawmakers, raising doubts about the effectiveness of this latest executive order.
Critics argue that Trump’s order may be more about political posturing than actual change, pointing to the lack of specific details and strategies outlined in the directive. Without concrete plans and bipartisan support, it remains to be seen whether the government can successfully lower prices for Americans in the long run.
As the debate over healthcare and affordability continues to rage on, all eyes will be on the Trump administration to see if they can follow through on this bold promise. Only time will tell if this executive order will lead to real change or simply be another empty gesture. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.
Tags:
- Trump administration
- U.S. government
- Lower prices
- American consumers
- Economic policy
- Trump presidency
- Price reduction
- Consumer affordability
- Government intervention
- Policy impact
#Trump #ordered #U.S #government #prices #Americans #deliver
Elon Musk’s ‘Department of Government Efficiency’ has a rough first week
About a month after Donald Trump won a second term, as Republican hype surrounding the so-called Department of Government Efficiency reached absurd levels, Punchbowl News’ Jake Sherman, an MSNBC contributor, spoke to a senior GOP aide with low expectations.
Referring to Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, then the chairs of the fake “department,” the congressional staffer said: “Two people who know nothing about how the government works pretending they can cut a trillion dollars, both with decent pulpits to preach from, and the ear of an unpredictable president? Disaster.”
Seven weeks later, the relevance of that prediction continues to linger — because things could be better in DOGE Land.
As this week got underway, for example, Ramaswamy resigned from the advisory panel, and according to multiple reports, his colleagues weren’t exactly sad to see him leave. A few days later, as The Wall Street Journal reported, the fake “department” suffered another major departure.
The top lawyer at Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency said he is leaving just days after President Trump’s return to the White House. Bill McGinley, whom Trump appointed as DOGE’s legal counsel in December, is in discussions with several large companies to return to the private sector.
The lawyer confirmed his departure in an interview with the Journal, emphasizing that he remains supportive of the president and his agenda.
If McGinley’s name sounds at all familiar, it’s because Trump announced in December that the Republican lawyer would serve as the next White House counsel. Four weeks later, for reasons that were not disclosed to the public, Trump changed his mind, demoted McGinley and dispatched him to the DOGE endeavor — which McGinley is now leaving, just days after the new president’s inauguration.
Making matters worse, it’s not the only challenge facing the initiative:
- DOGE is the target of multiple lawsuits that allege the endeavor is failing to comply with disclosure and hiring laws that apply to all advisory panels.
- The so-called department is facing new questions as to why it was created in such a way that it’s not subject to Freedom of Information Act requests.
- While the stated purpose of the project was to identify wasteful spending, Musk has already walked back Trump’s unrealistic campaign promises, and the president’s executive order creating DOGE said its purpose will be to “implement the President’s DOGE Agenda, by modernizing Federal technology and software to maximize governmental efficiency and productivity,” suggesting that the reason for the endeavor’s existence has already been overhauled.
Meanwhile, the “department” that was ostensibly created to address waste and fraud in federal spending is also already experiencing mission creep, reportedly contacting the U.S. Marshals Service this week to express concern about the speed with which pardoned Jan. 6 criminals were being released from detention.
In case that weren’t quite enough, a Wired magazine report noted that DOGE, at an institutional level, has been parked inside the executive branch by reorganizing and renaming an existing entity, the U.S. Digital Service, as the U.S. DOGE Service. That might not seem especially notable, but the Wired article added that this is a move “that will give centibillionaire Elon Musk and his allies seemingly unprecedented insight across the government, and access to troves of federal data.”
In other words, as the first week of Trump’s second term gets underway, the not-quite-real Department of Government Efficiency is both struggling and expanding its remit — which is far from an ideal scenario in an initiative clouded by secrecy.
The “disaster” prediction from December might’ve understated the case.
Elon Musk’s latest venture, the ‘Department of Government Efficiency,’ has had a rough first week as reports of chaos and confusion emerge from within the newly established agency.The department, created by Musk with the goal of streamlining government processes and increasing efficiency, has faced criticism for its lack of organization and unclear objectives. Employees have reportedly been struggling to understand their roles and responsibilities, leading to a series of miscommunications and delays in projects.
In addition, there have been concerns raised about the department’s transparency and accountability, with some accusing Musk of creating a secretive and opaque organization that operates outside of traditional government oversight.
Despite these challenges, Musk remains optimistic about the future of the ‘Department of Government Efficiency’ and has vowed to address the issues that have arisen during its first week of operation. Only time will tell if Musk’s ambitious vision for a more efficient government can be realized, or if the department will continue to face obstacles in its path to success.
Tags:
- Elon Musk
- Department of Government Efficiency
- Government reform
- SpaceX
- Tesla
- Innovation
- Technology
- Public administration
- Government efficiency
- Policy reform
#Elon #Musks #Department #Government #Efficiency #rough #week
Anthony Fauci Stripped of Government Security Protection
President Trump canceled Dr. Anthony S. Fauci’s government-financed security protection on Thursday night. The move made Dr. Fauci, who received death threats during the coronavirus pandemic, the latest prominent former official to lose his security detail since Mr. Trump returned to the White House.
“You can’t have it forever,” Mr. Trump said on a trip to North Carolina on Friday.
A person familiar with the situation said Dr. Fauci, who retired from government service in December 2022, has hired his own security detail.
Dr. Fauci, one of the nation’s top health officials for decades and a former director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, became a frequent target of conservative critics during the Covid-19 pandemic. In May 2022, a West Virginia man pleaded guilty to sending him and other federal officials emails that threatened to kill them and their families.
Dr. Fauci did not have Secret Service protection; he was protected by federal marshals, and later by a private contractor whose fees were paid by the government, the person said.
Dr. Fauci’s chief critic on Capitol Hill, Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, had publicly called for his security arrangement to be withdrawn.
On Thursday, Mr. Paul wrote on social media that he had “sent supporting information to end the 24 hr a day limo and security detail for Fauci,” adding, “I wish him nothing but peace but he needs to pay for his own limos.”
Those comments came hours after Mr. Paul criticized a pre-emptive pardon from President Joe Biden for Dr. Fauci in an appearance on Fox News, saying that accepting the pardon Dr. Fauci was “accepting his guilt.”
Mr. Trump’s decision on Dr. Fauci’s security came a day after he revoked the State Department security details for his former secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, and another former top aide, Brian Hook. Both men faced ongoing threats from Iran because of actions they took on Mr. Trump’s behalf during his first administration.
Mr. Trump has also pulled the Secret Service detail that had been protecting another former aide who later became a high-profile critic, John R. Bolton, his former national security adviser.
In a shocking turn of events, Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation’s top infectious disease expert, has been stripped of his government security protection. This decision comes amidst growing controversy surrounding Fauci’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and his conflicting statements about the origins of the virus.Many critics have accused Fauci of flip-flopping on crucial issues related to the pandemic and have called for his resignation. Some have even gone so far as to suggest that he should be held accountable for his role in the handling of the crisis.
Despite these criticisms, Fauci has remained steadfast in his commitment to public health and safety. He has continued to advocate for vaccination and other measures to curb the spread of the virus, even in the face of mounting pressure.
It remains to be seen what impact this move will have on Fauci’s ability to carry out his duties effectively. But one thing is clear: the controversy surrounding him shows no signs of abating anytime soon.
Tags:
Anthony Fauci, security protection, government, stripped, removal, consequences, controversy, decision, repercussions, public figure, national security, concerns, political implications, safety measures, government official
#Anthony #Fauci #Stripped #Government #Security #ProtectionEmail demands US government workers report DEI programmes
The Trump administration emailed thousands of federal employees on Wednesday, ordering them to report any efforts to “disguise” diversity initiatives in their agencies or face “adverse consequences”.
The request came after President Donald Trump banned diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) offices and programmes throughout the government.
Emails seen by the BBC directed workers to “report all facts and circumstances” to a new government email address within 10 days.
Some employees interpreted it as a demand to sell out their colleagues to the White House.
“We’re really freaked out and overwhelmed,” said one employee at the Department Health and Human Services (HHS).
The Office of Personnel Management, which manages the federal workforce, issued guidance requiring agency heads to send a notice to their staff by 17:00 eastern time on Wednesday. It included an email template that many federal staffers ultimately received that night.
Some employees, like those at the Treasury Department, got slightly different versions of the email.
The Treasury Department email excluded the warning about “adverse consequences” for not reporting DEI initiatives, according to a copy shared with the BBC.
In one of his first actions as president, Trump signed two executive orders ending “diversity, equity, and inclusion” or “DEI” programmes within the federal government and announced any employees working in those roles would immediately be placed on paid administrative leave.
Such programmes are designed to increase minority participation in the workforce and educate employees about discrimination.
But critics of DEI, like Trump, argue that the practice itself is discriminatory because it takes race, gender, sexual identity or other characteristics into consideration.
Trump and his allies attacked the practice frequently during the campaign.
In a speech Thursday at the World Economic Conference in Davos, Switzerland, Trump declared he was making America a “merit-based country”.
Critics of DEI have praised Trump’s decision.
“President Trump’s executive orders rescinding affirmative action and banning DEI programs are a major milestone in American civil rights progress and a critical step towards building a colour-blind society,” Yukong Mike Zhao, president of the Asian American Coalition for Education, said in a statement.
The group had supported a successful effort at the US Supreme Court to overturn affirmative action programmes at US universities.
But current federal employees, who spoke to the BBC on condition of anonymity because they feared retaliation, said that the email they received felt more like an attempt to intimidate staff than to make the government more fair.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
President Trump has signed a torrent of executive orders since he took office, including a hiring freeze in the federal government, an order for workers to return to the office and an attempt to reclassify thousands of government employees in order to make them easier to fire.
The HHS employee who spoke to the BBC criticised the government’s DEI practices, believing that while it was important to build a diverse staff and create opportunities in health and medical fields, “identity politics have played into how we function normally and that’s not beneficial to the workforce”.
“But that doesn’t mean I want my colleagues to get fired,” the employee added.
He described the impact the email and the DEI orders had on his agency as “very calculated chaos”.
The employee’s division had been thrown into confusion, he said, with questions about hiring practices going forward, as well as what programmes and directives were allowed to continue, given Trump’s broad definition of DEI.
A second HHS employee said that hiring and research grants had been frozen and the entire department staff was waiting to see what they could do next.
The HHS, and one of its subsidiary agencies, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), issue millions of dollars in federal grants to universities and researchers across the globe to advance scientific research.
Agency employees feared that the DEI order could have an impact outside the government as well. One questioned if grants that allowed laboratories to create more opportunities for hiring minority scientists and medical professionals would now get the axe.
An employee who worked at the Food and Drug Administration told the BBC that she had not received the email, but all DEI-related activities had been paused.
“We have been told by seniors to keep doing our jobs,” she said. “But there is a sense of fear about how it’s going to have an impact on our work in general.”
In a recent development, the US government has sent out an email demanding all government workers to report on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programmes within their departments. This move comes as part of the government’s efforts to ensure that all agencies are actively working towards creating a more inclusive and diverse workplace.The email, sent out by the Office of Personnel Management, outlines the importance of DEI initiatives and the need for transparency and accountability in this area. Government workers are being asked to provide information on the DEI programmes currently in place within their departments, as well as any plans for future initiatives.
This push for greater attention to DEI within the government is a positive step towards creating a more equitable and inclusive workplace for all. By ensuring that all agencies are actively working towards promoting diversity and inclusion, the government is taking an important step towards building a more representative and diverse workforce.
It will be interesting to see how government workers respond to this email and what impact it will have on the overall DEI efforts within the government. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.
Tags:
- US government workers
- DEI programs
- Diversity, equity, and inclusion
- Workplace diversity
- Government employees
- Employee demands
- Workplace equality
- Government diversity initiatives
- Inclusion programs
- Employee reporting requirements
#Email #demands #government #workers #report #DEI #programmes
Live updates: Trump seeks to reshape US government with executive actions
President Donald Trump, who has promised to deliver American energy dominance, is directly calling on help from foreign oil producers to help lower energy prices.
Trump argued that cheap oil would help end the war in Ukraine, which Russia has financed in part with its vast amount of oil revenue.
“I’m also going to ask Saudi Arabia and OPEC to bring down the cost of oil, you got to bring it down, which frankly, I’m surprised they didn’t do before the election,” Trump said during his virtual remarks at Davos. “That didn’t show a lot of love by them not doing it. I was a little surprised.”
The price of oil is set by global markets, though it is influenced by the amount of oil produced by Saudi Arabia and other OPEC members. OPEC has been propping up prices by restraining production.
Of course, cheap oil prices leading up to the election could have driven down gasoline prices, helping Trump’s opponent, former Vice President Kamala Harris.
It’s noteworthy that Trump is directly asking for help from OPEC, a foreign cartel that competes directly with the US oil industry whose support helped elect him.
By contrast, Trump in the spring of 2020 urged OPEC to restrain production to stop the oil crash slamming the US oil industry.
“If the price came down, the Russia-Ukraine war would end immediately,” Trump said Thursday. “Right now, the price is high enough that that war will continue…They’re very responsible, actually, to a certain extent, for what’s taking place.”
Trump seemed to be suggesting that a sharp selloff in oil prices would hurt the Russian economy to the point that Moscow agrees to end the war in Ukraine.
In a flurry of executive actions, President Trump is seeking to reshape the US government and make sweeping changes to key policies. Stay tuned for live updates as the administration moves forward with its agenda. #Trump #ExecutiveActions #GovernmentReshaping
Tags:
- Trump administration
- Executive actions
- Government reform
- Policy changes
- Political news
- White House updates
- US government reshaping
- Presidential actions
- Trump presidency
- Current events
#Live #updates #Trump #seeks #reshape #government #executive #actions
Internal Memos Instruct New York City Government Employees to Block ICE Raids
As President Donald Trump repealed years of precedent strongly discouraging immigration raids in schools, houses of worship, hospitals and other “sensitive locations,” Mayor Eric Adams on Tuesday declined to explain how the city will respond if federal agents start showing up at city facilities.
But behind the scenes it’s a different story, with local government agency heads in the last few days distributing advisories instructing staff to block access to any non-local law enforcement, even if presented with a judicial warrant. City employees were ordered instead to contact city lawyers who must authorize access.
Staff at the Department of Citywide Administrative Services (DCAS), for example, got a universal “all staff reminder” Friday requiring them to contact the agency’s general counsel if any non-federal law enforcement agent — including from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Customs and Border Protection (CBP) or the FBI — show up demanding access to facilities managed by DCAS.
The advisory from DCAS Commissioner Louis Molina and General Counsel J. Carolina Chavez says that “DCAS employees cannot grant access without first getting authorization from the General Counsel’s Office,” then advises staff to get the agent’s name and badge number, the phone number of a supervisor and an explanation of the purpose of the visit.
DCAS staff must obtain a copy of the warrant or take a photo of it and provide that to general counsel, then “politely direct the officer to wait outside” while they await further guidance from agency lawyers. The DCAS advisory implies that administratively issued warrants will not be acceptable.
DCAS oversees dozens of city-owned and leased buildings and is in charge of maintaining state courts in the five boroughs. Under state law, the courts already require non-local law enforcement to present a judicial warrant to gain access to courthouses while performing immigration enforcement.
The only exception to the new DCAS directive relates to “exigent circumstances” in which non-local law enforcement say access to a city facility is required due to “hot pursuit of a suspect or imminent risk of death or physical harm.” In that case, DCAS staff is instructed to “not attempt to forcefully deny entry” but to notify the general counsel’s office “immediately.”
DCAS did not respond to a request for comment from THE CITY.
A sign directs people to the entrance of a Department of Homeless Services-run shelter. Credit: Ben Fractenberg/THE CITY The city’s Department of Education sent out a similar directive to principals earlier this month, linking long-standing DOE guidance with even stronger language: “DOE does not consent to non-local law enforcement accessing school facilities in any circumstances, and principals and other school personnel may not give consent.”
The directive requires educators to first consult with a “Senior Field Counsel” even if ICE agents present a judicial warrant. Even if there are “exigent circumstances, such as imminent risk of death or physical harm,” principals must still contact the Education Department counsel, the NYPD and school safety agents on site.
In a Jan. 2 email blast to nonprofit providers who run hundreds of city shelters and other facilities, whose clients include many recent immigrants, the city’s Department of Social Services Commissioner, Molly Park, reminded them of the department’s policy for handling visits by non-local authorities like those from ICE.
“Non-local law enforcement officials, including federal officers and agents, may not enter DHS or HRA facilities, including those operated by a DHS or HRA provider/vendor, without a warrant signed by a judge, except in exigent circumstances,” the email read.
“In the event non-local law enforcement present a warrant signed by a judge, and before granting entry, DHS and its providers/vendors should immediately notify the appropriate Program Administrator and the DSS General Counsel.”
‘We’re Going to Follow the Law’
Beneath the bureaucratic language, the local government officials’ new memoranda speak to a sudden, lurching shift in immigration enforcement, departing from more than a decade of precedent.
A 2011 Obama-era memorandum barred most immigration enforcement in “sensitive locations” like schools, hospitals and houses of worship. Former President Biden updated the guidelines in 2021, adding other locations like playgrounds, recreation centers, homeless shelters, funerals, gravesites and rallies, among others.
The internal guidance did not appear to change during Trump’s first four years in office. But this time around, Trump repealed the memo in one of his first actions as president, according to a Tuesday press release from his Department of Homeland Security. The move was widely expected following reporting from NBC last month that a change was in the works.
P.S. 157 in Bed-Stuy has taken over 100 migrant children staying at the Hall Street shelter, Feb. 14, 2024. Credit: Ben Fractenberg/THE CITY Despite a flurry of warnings from city agencies in recent weeks about the prospect of ICE raids, Adams continued to avoid answering specific questions during his once-a-week availability to reporters Tuesday about how the city will handle Trump’s promised mass-deportation campaign.
“We’re telling our team to follow the law. The law is clear. We’re going to follow the law,” Adams said.
The mayor has steadfastly withheld any criticism of Trump, who has implied he might offer a pardon to the mayor related to the federal bribery and campaign finance fraud charges he currently faces.
Adams met with Trump at Mar-a-Lago over the weekend, then accepted a last-minute invitation to Trump’s inauguration Monday, cancelling his previously planned appearances at New York City events commemorating Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday.
Adams declined multiple requests from reporters to give his opinion about Trump’s Monday executive orders pardoning some 1,500 people involved in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riots and attempt to end birthright citizenship.
In response to several questions about how the city will respond to Trump’s initiatives, the mayor said, “Our team has been trained and we’ve done some training sessions,” but refused to provide details.
Asked for additional comment, Adams spokesperson Liz Garcia shared a Dec. 30 email from his chief of staff, Camille Verlack, that reaffirmed “our leadership’s commitment to stand firmly by the values that have made New York City a thriving city of immigrants, regardless of immigration status.” The communication went on to describe the city’s sanctuary protections that bar city officials from participating in immigration enforcement actions.
But following Trump’s election, the mayor has expressed doubts about the sanctuary laws in question.
Longstanding city laws and executive orders bar city government agencies from cooperating with immigration enforcement and even inquiring about immigration status, with limited exceptions for people convicted of certain violent felonies.
In December, after the City Council reaffirmed its support to keep those laws in place, Adams floated the idea of also finding ways to cooperate with federal law enforcement when it comes to undocumented immigrants who have been charged with violent felonies.
Naveed Hasan, an elected parent-member of the city’s Panel for Education Policy, said that while he is grateful the Department of Education has made it clear internally how schools are supposed to act if ICE turns up at their doors, the mayor’s failure to do so was causing a lot of uneasiness among educators.
“This could be said strongly by a mayor if he didn’t have an issue around needing something from the current president,” he said. “The last administration, Mayor de Blasio, was a champion of New York City residents. So to not have that in City Hall right now is causing a lot of consternation and a lot of paranoia.”
Related
In a shocking turn of events, internal memos have surfaced revealing that New York City government employees have been instructed to actively block ICE raids within the city. This directive comes amidst growing tensions between federal immigration enforcement agencies and local governments.The memos, which were leaked to the media, instruct employees to refuse entry to ICE agents without a warrant and to report any ICE activity to city officials immediately. The goal of these memos is to protect undocumented immigrants living in New York City from deportation and to uphold the city’s status as a sanctuary city.
This move has sparked controversy and debate among city officials, with some applauding the decision to protect immigrant communities and others criticizing the potential legal ramifications of defying federal immigration authorities.
As the debate continues to unfold, it is clear that tensions between local and federal government regarding immigration enforcement are at an all-time high. Stay tuned for further developments on this story.
Tags:
- New York City government
- ICE raids
- Internal memos
- Government employees
- NYC immigration policies
- Workplace instructions
- Employee guidelines
- Immigration enforcement
- NYC government news
- Immigration crackdowns
#Internal #Memos #Instruct #York #City #Government #Employees #Block #ICE #Raids
Government website offering reproductive health information goes offline
Government website reproductiverights.gov appeared to be offline on the evening of President Donald Trump’s inauguration.
The site, launched in 2022 by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services as part of a public awareness campaign, contained information on access to abortion and reproductive health care and a Know-Your-Rights patient fact sheet.
“Reproductive health care, including access to birth control and safe and legal abortion care, is an essential part of your health and well-being,” a statement on the website read. “While Roe v. Wade was overturned, abortion remains legal in many states, and other reproductive health care services remain protected by law.”
The site affirmed that most employer-based health plans and private health insurance plans are required to cover certain prescription birth control methods under the Affordable Care Act, which Trump has made calls to repeal. It also displayed a list of other services covered by most insurance plans, including breast and cervical cancer screenings, prenatal care and HIV screenings.
The site reiterated that while abortion legality varies by state, Mifepristone, in a regimen with misoprostol — otherwise known as a medication abortion — has been approved by the FDA and is safe and effective when used correctly.
It was not clear exactly when the site went down but it had been active as recently as Jan. 15.
CBS News has reached out to the Trump administration for clarification on why the site was down, but has not heard back.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who was tapped by Trump to oversee the Department of Health and Human Services, has flip-flopped on his public stance regarding abortion. He said on Facebook last year that “abortion should be legal up until a certain number of weeks, and restricted thereafter,” but also wrote that “every abortion is a tragedy,” calling for the reduction of abortions “by better supporting mothers, parents and families.”
In 2023, he expressed to an NBC News reporter that he would support a national ban on abortion after the first three months of pregnancy, but then hours later a spokesperson for Kennedy said that he “does not support legislation banning abortion,” the outlet reported.
Trump, meanwhile, has said that abortion decisions should be left to the states and that he would veto a federal abortion ban while also repeatedly taking credit for the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade.
According to the Guttmacher Institute, 12 states currently have a total abortion ban and in four states abortion is banned after six weeks, when most women are not yet aware they are pregnant. According to a CBS News poll, most Americans continue to favor abortion being legal in all or most cases.
More from CBS News
It has recently come to light that a government website dedicated to providing important reproductive health information has gone offline. This website served as a valuable resource for individuals seeking information on topics such as birth control, STD prevention, and family planning.The sudden disappearance of this website has left many people in a state of confusion and concern. Without access to this vital information, individuals may struggle to make informed decisions about their reproductive health.
It is crucial that the government takes immediate action to restore this website and ensure that it remains accessible to the public. Reproductive health is a fundamental aspect of overall well-being, and everyone deserves access to accurate and up-to-date information on this topic.
In the meantime, individuals are encouraged to seek out alternative sources of information, such as reputable health organizations and clinics. It is important to stay informed and empowered when it comes to making decisions about your reproductive health. Let’s hope that the government acts swiftly to rectify this situation and ensure that this valuable resource is once again available to those who need it.
Tags:
government website, reproductive health, information, offline, reproductive health resources, health information, government resources, online health resources, reproductive health services, government health website, reproductive health access
#Government #website #offering #reproductive #health #information #offline