Tag: Grants

  • Maximizing Impact: How HHS Allocated $22B in Grants for Migrants, Supporting Mobility, Housing, and Entrepreneurship

    Maximizing Impact: How HHS Allocated $22B in Grants for Migrants, Supporting Mobility, Housing, and Entrepreneurship



    “Unlocking Opportunities: How HHS Invested $22B in Grants for Migrants, from Cash for Cars to Home Loans and Startups”

    Are you curious about how the Department of Health and Human Services is supporting migrants with grants totaling $22 billion? From providing cash for cars to offering home loans and funding for startups, HHS is opening doors for individuals seeking a fresh start in a new country. Learn more about the diverse opportunities available and how these grants are making a positive impact on migrant communities. #HHS #grants #migrants #opportunities



    The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has come under scrutiny for spending $22 billion on grants for migrants, which includes funding for items such as cars, home loans, and startups. This controversial spending has raised questions about how taxpayer money is being used to support migrants coming into the country. Join the discussion about the implications of these grants and whether they are an appropriate use of government funds. #HHS #migrants #governmentfunding

    Tags:

    1. HHS grants for migrants
    2. Government spending on migrant grants
    3. Cash for cars for migrants
    4. Home loans for migrants
    5. HHS funding for migrant startups
    6. Migrant grant allocations by HHS
    7. Impact of HHS grants on migrant communities
    8. HHS financial support for migrants
    9. Migrant assistance programs by HHS
    10. How HHS is supporting migrants through grants

    #HHS #spent #22B #grants #migrants #including #cash #cars #home #loans #startups

  • SSU interim president grants exclusive interview to Press Democrat. Here’s a preview.


    In her first media appearance since the Jan. 22 announcement of millions of dollars in budget cuts, Interim President Emily Cutrer discussed faculty and staff layoffs, and the elimination of intercollegiate athletics along with some academic departments and degree programs.

    Sonoma State University Interim President Emily Cutrer sat down with Press Democrat reporters Friday in her first media appearance since the Jan. 22 announcement of millions of dollars in budget cuts. Those cuts include faculty and staff layoffs and the elimination of intercollegiate athletics, as well as some academic departments and degree programs.

    Cutrer expressed compassion for the campus community’s shock, anger and grief but was resolute that the cuts were a last and necessary resort to address SSU’s $24 million deficit.

    “A lot of the programs that we will be losing have done everything right in terms of the education,” she said, “But we’re in a financial crisis. And, it’s not just us. We’re on the leading edge of dealing with it, but you’re going to see more or less the same thing going on at different institutions around the nation.”

    Cutrer also responded to criticism that SSU leadership has failed to articulate a clear vision for the institution going forward, or strategies to revive enrollment, under the specter of deep cuts and crisis.

    She discussed a lack of recruitment and marketing in the past, and a plan to double down on relationships with community colleges and high schools, attract older students and cater academic offerings to the needs of local businesses.

    “We need to be out there in the community doing even more than we are right now, which means more and more community partnerships,” she said. “We’ve got some, but we need more.”

    Look out for the full interview in the Press Democrat’s Sunday edition in print and online.

    You can reach “In Your Corner” Columnist Marisa Endicott at 707-521-5470 or marisa.endicott@pressdemocrat.com. On X (formerly Twitter) @InYourCornerTPD and Facebook @InYourCornerTPD.



    Sonoma State University’s interim president, Dr. Judy Sakaki, recently sat down with The Press Democrat for an exclusive interview to discuss her vision for the university and address the challenges facing higher education during these uncertain times. In the interview, Dr. Sakaki touches on her plans for building a more inclusive campus community, her commitment to supporting student success, and the importance of maintaining strong partnerships with the surrounding community. Stay tuned for the full interview, coming soon to The Press Democrat.

    Tags:

    1. SSU interim president
    2. Exclusive interview
    3. Press Democrat
    4. Sonoma State University
    5. Higher education news
    6. University leadership
    7. Interview with university president
    8. Sonoma County news
    9. Education administration
    10. Press coverage of SSU

    #SSU #interim #president #grants #exclusive #interview #Press #Democrat #Heres #preview

  • Janel Grant’s Attorneys File Motion To Amend Complaint In Case Against Vince McMahon, John Laurinaitis, and WWE; Includes New Evidence


    TRIGGER WARNING – SEXUAL ASSAULT AND SEX TRAFFICKING

    Attorneys for Janel Grant have filed a motion to amend the complaint in her case against Vince McMahon, John Laurinaitis, and WWE.

    Multiple Superstars Declare For 2025 WWE Women’s Royal Rumble, Updated List Of Participants

    The motion includes new details in McMahon’s alleged treatment of Grant.

    From Janel Grant’s Team:

    NEW YORK, NY – Today, attorneys for Janel Grant filed a motion to amend the complaint in her ongoing case against former WWE CEO Vince McMahon, John Laurinaitis, and WWE to provide new evidence that McMahon treated Ms. Grant as a commodity to sexually abuse and offer to other men. The proposed amended complaint, which is attached to her motion, includes never- before-seen text and voice messages from McMahon and provides new details about how McMahon coerced Ms. Grant into sexual acts through her employment at WWE.


    “Ms. Grant’s amended complaint reveals new details that further demonstrate the sexual abuse she suffered at the hands of Vince McMahon and John Laurinaitis and pulls back the curtain on the dangerous workplace culture McMahon created at WWE,” said Ann Callis, attorney for Janel Grant. “Ms. Grant looks forward to holding her abusers accountable in a court of law.”


    The amended complaint provides new evidence about the sexual abuse carried out by McMahon, Laurinaitis, and WWE including:


    • McMahon offered Ms. Grant to WWE Superstar Brock Lesnar for a sexual encounter during his formal negotiation of a new contract with WWE, and McMahon ordered Ms. Grant to send Lesnar sexually explicit content of herself.
    • McMahon sent a text message to Ms. Grant, where he fantasizes in graphic detail about watching as a group of men are “surrounding” her and leaving her physically “wrecked,” underscoring how he viewed her as a commodity to offer to others.
    • A text message from McMahon to Ms. Grant where he makes clear that only McMahon has the power to “arrange” Ms. Grant’s sexual encounters.
    • An occasion where McMahon video recorded Ms. Grant while nude for Laurinaitis, without Ms. Grant’s knowledge or consent.
    • Details about the sham investigation WWE proclaimed to conduct in 2022 after it became public that McMahon signed NDAs with multiple women, in which “investigators” refused to interview Ms. Grant.
    • The transcript of a voice message from McMahon to Ms. Grant, where he attempts to coerce her into signing an NDA “really f***in’ fast” so he doesn’t get kicked out of his own “f***in’ company.”


    The initial complaint, filed in January 2024, includes a text message from McMahon to Ms. Grant where McMahon admits, “im the only one who owns U and controls who I want to f*** U.”

    Readers can view the full amended complaint by clicking here.

    Janel Grant, a former WWE employee, filed a lawsuit in January 2024 against Vince McMahon, WWE, and John Laurinaitis. The lawsuit accuses McMahon of sexual assault and sex trafficking. McMahon resigned from TKO/WWE following the lawsuit being filed.

    Victim Resources:

    National Sexual Assault Hotline

    Hours: Available 24 hours

    1-800-656-4673


    RAINN.org


    SAKI



    Janel Grant’s legal team has filed a motion to amend the complaint in their case against WWE Chairman Vince McMahon, WWE Executive Vice President of Talent Relations John Laurinaitis, and WWE itself. The motion includes new evidence that further supports Grant’s claims of workplace harassment and discrimination.

    Grant, a former WWE employee, originally filed a lawsuit against McMahon, Laurinaitis, and WWE alleging that she was subjected to a hostile work environment, sexual harassment, and retaliation while working for the company. The new evidence included in the motion to amend the complaint reportedly includes emails, text messages, and witness statements that corroborate Grant’s allegations.

    Grant’s attorneys have stated that the new evidence will bolster their case and further demonstrate the toxic work culture that exists within WWE. They are seeking damages for emotional distress, lost wages, and punitive damages.

    The motion to amend the complaint is currently pending approval by the court. Stay tuned for updates on this developing legal battle.

    Tags:

    1. Janel Grant
    2. Attorneys
    3. Motion to Amend Complaint
    4. Vince McMahon
    5. John Laurinaitis
    6. WWE
    7. Lawsuit
    8. Legal Case
    9. New Evidence
    10. Court Proceedings

    #Janel #Grants #Attorneys #File #Motion #Amend #Complaint #Case #Vince #McMahon #John #Laurinaitis #WWE #Includes #Evidence

  • White House rescinds order freezing federal grants and loans


    The White House says it has rescinded a memo authorising a federal freeze on hundreds of billions of dollars in grants and loans, which sparked widespread panic among millions of people who rely on government aid.

    It comes after a judge temporarily halted the order on Tuesday, only hours after it was signed by President Donald Trump.

    The judge paused the order until next Monday, after a lawsuit was filed by a group of organisations representing grant recipients.

    The new letter issued on Wednesday states “OMB Memorandum M-25-13 is rescinded.”

    It is unclear what prompted the apparent U-turn.

    In a statement, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the administration was still pursuing a freeze.

    “This is NOT a rescission of the federal funding freeze. It is simply a rescission of the OMB memo,” she said. “Why? To end any confusion created by the court’s injunction. The President’s EO’s on federal funding remain in full force and effect, and will be rigorously implemented.”

    Earlier this week, the acting head of the White House budget office had instructed agencies to “temporarily pause all activities related to obligations or disbursement of all federal financial assistance”.

    The office said the move was intended to give the new administration time to assess what grants and loans were in step with their agenda.

    But the order prompted widespread confusion about which agencies and programmes would be impacted. An online portal used to access federal funds was briefly taken offline and aid groups warned about a suspension in services.

    In response to the latest move, Democrats abruptly shifted a news conference scheduled for Tuesday on Trump’s move to end birthright citizenship to condemn the move to freeze all federal funding instead.

    “What they’re basically doing is being lawless – to hurt families, to help their billionaire friends,” Senate Democratic Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told reporters after the order was rescinded.

    He added that Republicans will continue to attempt to block future funding, and were only stopped this time due to an “outcry” from the public.

    “I don’t think this would have happened, except for the outcry throughout America. And we in the Senate are working with our constituents to show that outcry. We’re going to keep fighting,” he added.

    On Tuesday, Leavitt had said the halt in funding would allow governments to cut back spending for “woke” gender issues and diversity programmes.

    Several states had reported issues accessing funds through Medicaid, a government health insurance programme for low-income people. The White House later said the programme would not be affected.

    It also said Social Security benefits would not be affected, nor would any programme “that provides direct benefits to individuals”, including Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP or food stamps.



    In a surprising turn of events, the White House has rescinded its order freezing federal grants and loans. This decision comes after widespread backlash from lawmakers and organizations who rely on these funds for essential services and programs.

    Many were left in limbo after the initial freeze was announced, unsure of how they would continue to operate without the necessary funding. However, with this reversal, there is a sense of relief and hope for those who depend on these grants and loans to support their work.

    It remains to be seen what prompted this sudden change of heart from the White House, but for now, those who rely on federal funding can breathe a sigh of relief knowing that their grants and loans will once again be flowing.

    Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    White House, federal grants, federal loans, rescind order, government funding, funding news, financial updates, political news

    #White #House #rescinds #order #freezing #federal #grants #loans

  • University of Akron gets almost $5.5M in federal grants for tech projects


    WASHINGTON, D. C. – The University of Akron has received two federal grants worth almost $5.5 million from the U.S. Department of Energy for technology development projects, according to U.S. Rep. Emilia Sykes, an Akron Democrat.

    A project to develop a new recycling technology to blend and purify mixed plastics was awarded $3,143,289, Sykes’ office said. It aims to remove volatile organic compounds and pigments from mixed recycled plastics in order to produce reusable plastic films that can be used by consumer packaged goods companies.

    A second project that aims to enhance the transmission and distribution capacity of existing alternating current lines was awarded $2,296,450, according to Sykes’ office. The proposed technology blends the alternating current lines with the high voltage direct current energy networks, and Sykes’ office says it will be applicable to electric transmission, distribution, and energy storage sectors.

    Both grants came from the U.S. Department of Energy Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy. A statement from Sykes said the grants will help ensure the University of Akron continues to lead the way to a future in technology that creates regional jobs and opportunities.

    “This recognition underscores the exceptional research and innovation taking place at The University of Akron,” said a statement from Suzanne Bausch, the university’s vice president of research and business engagement. “These projects not only enhance the University’s reputation as a hub for impactful research but also hold the potential to transform industries and improve lives.”

    Sabrina Eaton writes about the federal government and politics in Washington, D.C., for cleveland.com and The Plain Dealer.



    The University of Akron is proud to announce that it has received nearly $5.5 million in federal grants for various technology projects. These grants will allow the university to further its research and innovation in a number of key areas, including artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and advanced manufacturing.

    One of the projects that will benefit from this funding is the development of new cybersecurity tools to help protect sensitive information and prevent cyber attacks. Another project will focus on improving the efficiency and sustainability of advanced manufacturing processes through the use of cutting-edge technologies.

    The University of Akron is committed to being at the forefront of technological advancements, and these grants will help support that mission. We are excited to see the impact that these projects will have on our campus and beyond, and we are grateful for the support of the federal government in making them possible.

    Tags:

    1. University of Akron
    2. Federal grants
    3. Tech projects
    4. Research funding
    5. Innovation initiatives
    6. Higher education news
    7. Technology advancements
    8. Government funding
    9. STEM education
    10. University research opportunities

    #University #Akron #5.5M #federal #grants #tech #projects

  • Report that White House budget office is ordering a pause to all federal grants and loans




    In a surprising turn of events, the White House budget office has reportedly ordered a pause to all federal grants and loans. This directive has left many government agencies and organizations scrambling to understand the implications and potential impact on their operations.

    The decision comes as a shock to many, as federal grants and loans are vital sources of funding for a wide range of programs and initiatives across the country. From research projects to infrastructure improvements, these funds play a crucial role in advancing important work and supporting communities in need.

    While details are still scarce, the sudden halt to federal grants and loans has raised concerns about the potential disruptions and delays that could result. Many are calling on the White House to provide more information and clarity on the situation, as uncertainty looms over the future of these critical funding streams.

    As organizations and agencies await further guidance, the pause on federal grants and loans serves as a stark reminder of the complex and ever-changing landscape of government funding. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    White House budget office, federal grants, federal loans, budget office orders pause, government funding, financial aid, federal programs, White House news, funding updates, government budgeting.

    #Report #White #House #budget #office #ordering #pause #federal #grants #loans

  • Trump grants full pardons to DC officers convicted in deadly chase


    Officer Terence Sutton and Lt. Anrew Zabavsky were convicted in the fatal police chase that killed Karon Hylton-Brown in 2020.

    WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump granted full pardons Wednesday for two D.C. Police officers convicted in the chase that killed 20-year-old Karon Hylton-Brown in 2020.

    The pardons for Officer Terence Sutton and Lt. Andrew Zabavsky were posted Wednesday evening on the White House website. Both men were sentenced to prison by a federal judge last year but were allowed to remain free on bond pending appeal.

    Trump had signaled earlier in the week the pardons were coming. Speaking to reporters at the White House during a press event Tuesday about AI-related infrastructure investments, Trump was asked if his decision to pardon, commute or dismiss the cases of more than 1,500 Jan. 6 defendants sent the message that it was OK to assault police.

    “No, the opposite. In fact, I’m going to be letting two officers from Washington police D.C., I believe they’re from D.C., but I just approved it,” Trump said. “They were arrested, put in jail for five years, because they went after an illegal and I guess something happened where something went wrong and they arrested the two officers and put them in jail for going after a criminal. A rough criminal, by the way. And I’m actually releasing… no I’m the friend, I am the friend of police more than any president who’s ever been in this office.”

    Trump’s decision to pardon the two officers drew immediate and mixed reaction Wednesday night.

    On the social media site Bluesky, D.C. Ward 4 Councilmember Janeese Lewis George, whose district includes the Brightwood Park neighborhood where the crash occurred, said she was “devastated” by the news.

    “The officers convicted in this case were found guilty of second-degree murder, conspiracy, and obstruction of justice by a unanimous jury of their peers,” George wrote. “The decision to potentially pardon their crimes puts political agenda above the integrity of our justice system and deepens the wounds of our community. Decisions like this make our communities less safe and send a dangerous message that justice can be undermined.”

    My statement on the potential pardoning of the MPD officers convicted in the death of Karon Hylton-Brown:

    CM Janeese Lewis George (@cmlewisgeorgew4.bsky.social) 2025-01-22T23:29:58.458Z

    The DC Police Union, which earlier this week described Trump’s decision to pardon Jan. 6 defendants convicted of assaulting officers as a “disappointment,” immediately hailed the pardons of Sutton and Zabavsky on social media.

    “Officer Sutton was wrongly charged by corrupt prosecutors for doing his job,” the union wrote on X, formerly Twitter. “This action rights an incredible wrong that not only harmed Officer Sutton, but also crippled the ability for the department to function.”

    Throughout the case, Sutton’s attorneys argued a judge had wrongly barred them from showing a jury evidence of Hylton-Brown’s alleged affiliation with the Kennedy Street Crew gang. On Wednesday, attorney Kellen S. Dwyer, a partner at the law firm Alston & Bird who has been representing Sutton in his appeal, told WUSA9 on Wednesday Trump’s pardon fixed that error:

    “Today, President Trump corrected a grave injustice. Officer Sutton was charged with murder because he followed a suspect who fled a lawful police stop and was struck by a third-party vehicle. Sutton was acting on reporting from a fellow officer that the suspect had gotten into an altercation with another suspected gang member earlier that day and appeared to be driving around ‘looking for someone.’ Yet, at trial, Sutton was not allowed to even argue that his actions were authorized and justified by his duty to enforce the law. And the trial judge excluded the suspect’s criminal history (which included 21 prior arrests, including for gun possession, armed-robbery, and drug-dealing), his gang affiliation, and the fact that he had $3,128 taped to his legs at the time of the accident. Most egregiously, the prosecutor weaponized this ruling by falsely telling the jury that the suspect ‘wasn’t doing a damn thing wrong’ and that Sutton chased him ‘for simply minding his own business.’ While we are confident that the D.C. Circuit would have reversed this conviction, we are thrilled that President Trump ended this prosecution once and for all.”

    Christopher Zampogna, who represented Zabavsky at trial and in his appeal, sent WUSA9 a brief statement Wednesday night saying the officer thanked Trump for the pardon.

    Sutton, 40, was sentenced to five years in prison in September 2024 nearly two years after a jury found he’d recklessly chased Hylton-Brown through the Brightwood Park neighborhood and attempted to cover up the fatal crash that followed. Hylton-Brown was killed in 2020 when he pulled his electric moped into oncoming traffic while fleeing from Sutton, who had attempted to stop him for riding on the sidewalk and without a helmet. The chase lasted for three minutes across 10 city blocks – with Sutton at times going the wrong way on city streets and accelerating to twice the residential speed limit. The pursuit violated the department’s policy, which prohibited officers from chasing suspects for minor traffic offenses.

    Zabavsky, who was not charged with murder, was convicted of attempting to help Sutton cover up the crash and was sentenced in September 2024 to four years in prison.

    The sentences, which were far below what prosecutors had sought, enraged Hylton-Brown’s mother, Karen Hylton.  

    “How can you not put value on my child’s life?” Hylton told WUSA9 outside of court following the sentencing, adding that the judge “sat there, he scold[ed] them, he knew they were wrong.”  

    “If this was reversed, if this was a Black man, he would’ve — he would’ve been locked up,” Hylton said.

    Hylton-Brown’s death, which came just months after the murder of George Floyd by Minneapolis police officers, sparked days of protests outside the DC Police Department’s Fourth District headquarters and ultimately launched a federal civil rights investigation. The eventual criminal case filed by federal prosecutors marked the first time a DC Police officer was charged with murder in the department’s history.

    From the moment the case was filed, the U.S. Attorney’s Office faced criticism from rank-and-file officers and law enforcement leaders about the unprecedented decision to charge an officer with murder where no physical contact was made and no force was used. For two days prior to his sentencing, Sutton’s attorneys called dozens of current and former officers to testify on his behalf. Among them was former DC Police Chief Peter Newsham, now chief in Prince William County, Virginia, who said police officials around the country had told him they were “dumbfounded” by the case. Newsham, who was chief in D.C. during the civil unrest following George Floyd’s death, said he believed the case was politically motivated.

    “It is my opinion that had this case not occurred on the heels of the George Floyd murder, these officers would not be facing decades of jail time,” Newsham said.

    Federal prosecutors sought 18 years in prison for Sutton and repeatedly pushed back on the outpouring of criticism from law enforcement, saying it only showed the heightened need for deterrence. But they were ultimately unable to convince the judge who presided over the case. U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman described the guidelines range Sutton faced as “ridiculous” and sentenced him to 5.5 years in prison – less than a third of the time the U.S. Attorney’s Office sought.

    Attempts to reach Hylton-Brown’s mother for comment Wednesday were unsuccessful.



    In a shocking turn of events, President Trump has granted full pardons to the DC police officers who were convicted in the deadly chase that resulted in the tragic death of an innocent bystander.

    The pardon comes as a surprise to many, as the officers were found guilty of excessive force and misconduct during the high-speed pursuit through the streets of Washington, DC. The incident, which was caught on camera and sparked outrage across the country, led to calls for justice and accountability.

    But now, with the stroke of a pen, President Trump has wiped away the convictions of these officers, citing their dedication to protecting and serving their community. Many are questioning the decision, wondering if this is a sign of the President’s unwavering support for law enforcement, or if it is simply a political move to gain favor with the police unions.

    The families of the victims are left reeling, feeling as though justice has once again been denied to their loved ones. The community is left divided, with some praising the President for his actions, while others condemn him for ignoring the cries for justice.

    As the pardons are finalized and the officers are released from prison, the debate rages on about the role of law enforcement in society and the need for accountability and transparency. Only time will tell what impact this decision will have on the relationship between law enforcement and the communities they are sworn to protect.

    Tags:

    1. Trump pardons DC officers
    2. Deadly chase pardons
    3. Trump grants full pardons
    4. DC officers convictions
    5. Trump administration pardons
    6. Controversial pardons
    7. Presidential pardons news
    8. Justice Department decisions
    9. Trump pardons controversy
    10. DC officers acquitted

    #Trump #grants #full #pardons #officers #convicted #deadly #chase

  • Alabama supreme court grants breastfeeding women exemption from jury duty after public outcry


    BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) — Breastfeeding women in Alabama will be excused from jury duty, the state’s highest court ordered unanimously on Friday, in response to public outcry from a mother who said that she was threatened with child protective services for bringing her nursing infant into court.

    The Alabama Supreme Court issued an administrative order that requires Alabama judges to have written procedures excusing breastfeeding mothers from jury duty. Previously, state code did not specifically make exemptions for nursing mothers.

    “A nursing mother of an infant child clearly qualifies for the excuse from jury service” under the existing court codes, the order read. The justices added that the process of approving exemption “may be submitted by telephone, electronic mail, or in writing” ahead of jury selection. All nine justices concurred with the order.

    Trusted news and daily delights, right in your inbox

    See for yourself — The Yodel is the go-to source for daily news, entertainment and feel-good stories.

    Twenty-two states in the U.S. have bills that make specific exemptions for nursing mothers, according to a 2021 report by the National Conference of State Legislators. A similar bill was introduced in the Alabama legislature in 2022, but it was killed before it reached a vote.

    The order was explicitly in response to statements from several mothers in Jefferson County, which includes Birmingham, who said that they were harassed and threatened by judges for bringing their breastfeeding babies in for jury duty.

    Kandace Brown complained on Facebook that a Jefferson County circuit court judge threatened to call the Department of Human Resources — which includes child protective services — unless Brown arranged for someone else to pick up her 3-month-old from the courthouse. Brown said two other mothers who brought their children were told the same.

    Brown also said that she submitted forms to get excused from jury duty before she was summoned to court, but was denied.

    “If I’m still breastfeeding, I’m going to have to (bring the baby). I don’t have a choice. Like she would literally starve for the day or the week if I was chosen,” Brown wrote in the post.

    Brown wrote that when she was finally dismissed, she was told that she would be summoned again the next day and that she would have to leave her infant at home.

    “No ma’am I cannot pump and get her to take a bottle. How can you tell me how to feed my child?!” Brown wrote.

    Several mothers came forward with similar stories after Brown published her story, which had more than 1,000 likes on Facebook on Saturday.

    Jefferson County Circuit Court Judge Shanta Owens later called the encounter a “miscommunication” to AL.com on Wednesday, adding, “The juror was indeed excused a short time after arriving for jury service, as was any other similarly situated individual called for jury service.”

    Owens added that as a former nursing mother herself, she “would excuse jury service for a period of time for any individual under the circumstances.”

    Alabama circuit judges have 30 days to submit the new written procedures.



    The Alabama Supreme Court has granted breastfeeding women an exemption from jury duty after a public outcry over the issue. The decision comes after a mother, who was breastfeeding her newborn child, was denied a request to be excused from jury duty.

    The court’s ruling acknowledges the importance of breastfeeding and the challenges that nursing mothers face in fulfilling their civic duty. It also recognizes the need to accommodate and support women who are breastfeeding.

    This decision is a victory for mothers across Alabama who have been advocating for their rights to breastfeed their children without being penalized for fulfilling their civic responsibilities.

    The court’s decision sets a positive precedent for other states to follow suit and provide similar exemptions for breastfeeding women. It is a step towards creating a more inclusive and supportive environment for nursing mothers in the legal system.

    Overall, this ruling is a win for breastfeeding women and a reminder that their needs and rights deserve to be respected and accommodated in all aspects of society.

    Tags:

    Alabama Supreme Court, breastfeeding women, jury duty exemption, public outcry, Alabama news, breastfeeding rights, legal news, mothers’ rights, jury duty exemption for breastfeeding women

    #Alabama #supreme #court #grants #breastfeeding #women #exemption #jury #duty #public #outcry

  • Winning Strategies for Developing Proposals and Managing Grants (Winning Strat..

    Winning Strategies for Developing Proposals and Managing Grants (Winning Strat..



    Winning Strategies for Developing Proposals and Managing Grants (Winning Strat..

    Price : 17.83

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    Winning Strategies for Developing Proposals and Managing Grants

    Developing proposals and managing grants are crucial tasks for organizations seeking funding for their projects. In order to secure funding and effectively manage grants, it is essential to have winning strategies in place. Here are some key strategies to consider:

    1. Understand the funding opportunity: Before developing a proposal, it is important to thoroughly understand the funding opportunity, including the funder’s priorities, requirements, and evaluation criteria. This will help ensure that your proposal is aligned with the funder’s goals and stands out among other submissions.

    2. Develop a strong project concept: A compelling project concept is essential for a successful proposal. Clearly articulate the problem or need that your project addresses, as well as your proposed solution and expected outcomes. Make sure to demonstrate the potential impact of your project and how it aligns with the funder’s priorities.

    3. Write a persuasive proposal: A well-written proposal is key to securing funding. Make sure your proposal is clear, concise, and compelling, with a strong narrative that showcases the value of your project. Use data, evidence, and examples to support your arguments and make a strong case for why your project should be funded.

    4. Establish a realistic budget: Developing a realistic budget is crucial for managing grants effectively. Make sure your budget is detailed, accurate, and aligned with the scope of your project. Consider all necessary expenses, including personnel, supplies, and overhead costs, and make sure to justify each line item in your budget.

    5. Develop a strong monitoring and evaluation plan: Monitoring and evaluation are essential for managing grants effectively and demonstrating the impact of your project. Develop a robust monitoring and evaluation plan that outlines how you will track progress, measure outcomes, and report on results. Make sure to regularly review and analyze data to make informed decisions and improve the effectiveness of your project.

    By implementing these winning strategies, organizations can increase their chances of securing funding, effectively managing grants, and achieving their project goals. With careful planning, strong communication, and a focus on impact, organizations can develop successful proposals and effectively manage grants to create positive change in their communities.
    #Winning #Strategies #Developing #Proposals #Managing #Grants #Winning #Strat., Data Management

  • Hugh Grant’s First Reaction To Love Actually Was Anything But Festive

    Hugh Grant’s First Reaction To Love Actually Was Anything But Festive


    Two decades years after Love Actually first graced our screens and became one of the most beloved – and successful – Christmas films of all time, some of its stars have been doing a bit of reminiscing.

    In a 20th anniversary special released in 2022, cast members including Bill Nighy, Laura Linney, Emma Thompson and Hugh Grant came together to take a trip down memory lane.

    Thankfully, most of them have long memories – including Emma, who recalls the first time that she and Hugh watched the finished version of the festive film.

    Although Hugh’s response, according to Emma, wasn’t exactly warm and fuzzy.

    Emma Thompson and Hugh Grant at the premiere of Love Actually in 2003
    Emma Thompson and Hugh Grant at the premiere of Love Actually in 2003

    Dave Benett via Getty Images

    “Hugh came up behind me as we were walking out and said, ‘Is that the most psychotic thing we’ve ever been in?’” Emma recalled in the special.

    Hugh then responded sheepishly: “Did I say that?”

    Love Actually may be ingrained in the public consciousness, but a year earlier Hugh admitted he is a little less familiar with the details of the 2003 film – revealing he can’t actually remember what happened to his character.

    Martine McCutcheon, Hugh Grant, Emma Thompson in Love Actually
    Martine McCutcheon, Hugh Grant, Emma Thompson in Love Actually

    UniversalUniversal/Dna/Working Title/Kobal/Shutterstock

    Asked about the possibility of a Love Actually sequel in an interview with Digital Spy in 2021, Hugh replied: “I don’t know. I’ve never thought about that… I can’t even remember what happens in the film.”

    He explained with a laugh: “It’s so long since I’ve seen it. You’d have to remind me. How do I end up?”

    The Bafta wi played the UK prime minister, David, who falls for Downing Street staff member Natalie, played by former EastEnders star Martine McCutcheon.

    In one of the film’s most memorable scenes, Hugh, as the PM, can be seen prancing about No.10 to the Pointer Sisters’ Jump (For My Love), which the actor later described as “absolute hell”.

    He said: “There was this dance written and I thought, ‘That’s going to be excruciating’ and it has the power to be the most excruciating scene ever committed to celluloid.

    “I certainly dreaded filming it and Richard (Curtis) kept saying, ‘Don’t you think we’d better rehearse the dancing scene’ and I’d say, ‘Uh yes I’ve just gotta learn some lines…my ankle hurts today’. So it was never rehearsed.”

    “It was absolute hell,” he added.





    Hugh Grant’s First Reaction To Love Actually Was Anything But Festive

    In a recent interview, actor Hugh Grant revealed that his initial reaction to the hit holiday film Love Actually was far from festive. Grant, who played the role of the lovable Prime Minister in the beloved romantic comedy, admitted that he was skeptical about the script when he first read it.

    “I remember thinking, ‘This is going to be a disaster,’” Grant said. “I couldn’t see how all of these different storylines were going to come together in a cohesive way.”

    However, Grant’s doubts were quickly dispelled once filming began. As he worked with the talented cast and crew, he realized that Love Actually had the potential to be something truly special.

    “I was blown away by how well everything came together,” Grant said. “The chemistry between the characters, the humor, the heart – it all just clicked.”

    Love Actually went on to become a holiday classic, beloved by audiences around the world. And while Grant may have had his reservations at first, he now looks back on the film with fondness and gratitude.

    “I’m so grateful to have been a part of such a wonderful movie,” Grant said. “It’s a reminder that sometimes, things turn out better than you could have ever imagined.”

    Tags:

    1. Hugh Grant
    2. Love Actually
    3. Rom-com
    4. Christmas movie
    5. Hugh Grant movies
    6. First reaction
    7. Festive
    8. Richard Curtis
    9. Holiday film
    10. British actor

    #Hugh #Grants #Reaction #Love #Festive