Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: halting
Trump Administration Considers Halting Congestion Pricing
The Trump administration is considering a move to halt New York City’s congestion pricing program, according to two people with knowledge of the matter.
The Department of Transportation is discussing whether to withdraw a key federal authorization that the tolling plan received from the Biden administration last year. Such a move would almost certainly touch off a legal battle between the state and federal governments, and could effectively kill congestion pricing in its infancy.
No final decision has been made but President Trump had vowed to halt congestion pricing once he entered office, saying it was harmful to the city’s economy. The program’s opponents have urged Mr. Trump to re-examine it, with Gov. Philip D. Murphy of New Jersey calling it “a disaster for working- and middle-class New Jersey commuters and residents” in a letter to Mr. Trump last week.
The tolling program started on Jan. 5 after surviving a number of lawsuits seeking to block it and a last-minute suspension by Gov. Kathy Hochul of New York in June.
Ms. Hochul and Mr. Trump have spoken twice this week including on Thursday morning. They discussed a range of issues including congestion pricing, according to a person familiar with the matter, with the governor conveying to Mr. Trump that the program was showing signs of success.
President Trump told Ms. Hochul, the person said, that there would be no immediate action and that before any decisions were made they should touch base again next week.
A White House spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
There is little precedent for the reversal of a transportation project of this magnitude, transit experts said. New York’s congestion pricing plan, an idea that first took shape in the state more than six decades ago, is the first such program in the country. Legal experts said that the federal government’s maneuver could flout the law and would undoubtedly face resistance in the courts.
“It is questionable whether the administration can unilaterally halt congestion pricing,” said Michael Gerrard, a Columbia Law School professor who supports the program. “The legal authority for that is not at all apparent.”
The Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which operates congestion pricing, declined to comment on the latest potential threat to the program, but pointed to recent comments it had made about the plan’s resilience.
“We’ve been sued in every federal court and state court east of the Mississippi, and we’re batting 1.000,” Janno Lieber, the chair and chief executive of the M.T.A., said in an interview this month. “We’ve won every time.”
A spokesman for Ms. Hochul pointed to her past statements talking up the merits of the program and why it was important to help improve New York’s transit system.
Other cities that have implemented congestion pricing programs, including London, Stockholm and Singapore, have used the tolls to cut traffic and vehicle emissions, push people to use other modes of transportation and raise money. The tolls are typically unpopular at the onset before gradually winning over more public support. In New York, more than half of voters across the state were opposed to congestion pricing in a Siena College survey released in December.
The plan, which state lawmakers approved in 2019, charges most vehicles a $9 fee to enter Manhattan below 60th Street, home to some of the most traffic-choked roads in the world. The program cleared its final bureaucratic hurdle in November when the Federal Highway Administration granted New York the approval it needed to toll drivers.
The M.T. A. had spent half a billion dollars on infrastructure for toll collection during the run-up to the program’s implementation.
Congestion pricing seeks to reduce the number of vehicles entering the newly tolled zone, which contains famed landmarks like the Empire State Building, Times Square and Wall Street. The tolls aim to help the M.T.A. raise $15 billion in financing for repairs and upgrades to the city’s decrepit subway system, which still depends on equipment that in some cases predates World War II. The funding is also earmarked for improvements to the authority’s bus fleet and two commuter train lines.
The Trump Administration is currently considering halting congestion pricing, a policy that aims to reduce traffic congestion by charging drivers a fee for entering certain areas during peak hours. This move comes as cities like New York have implemented congestion pricing in an effort to reduce traffic and improve air quality.Critics of congestion pricing argue that it unfairly targets low-income individuals who may not have other transportation options and could end up paying a significant portion of their income in fees. Proponents, on the other hand, believe that congestion pricing is an effective way to reduce traffic congestion, encourage the use of public transportation, and ultimately improve the quality of life in urban areas.
The Trump Administration’s potential decision to halt congestion pricing could have significant implications for cities across the country that are considering implementing similar policies. It remains to be seen how this debate will play out and what the ultimate impact will be on traffic congestion and air quality in urban areas. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.
Tags:
Trump Administration, Congestion Pricing, Transportation Policy, Traffic Management, Urban Planning, Public Policy, Road Pricing, Traffic Congestion, Trump Administration News, Infrastructure Development
#Trump #Administration #Considers #Halting #Congestion #PricingTrump to sign executive orders proclaiming there are only two biological sexes, halting diversity programs
President-elect Donald Trump plans to sign executive orders proclaiming that the U.S. government will recognize only two sexes, male and female, and ending “radical and wasteful” diversity, equity and inclusion programs inside federal agencies, according to senior White House officials.
The White House officials grouped both orders under the incoming Trump administration’s wider “restoring sanity” agenda. The orders were detailed by an incoming official on a phone call Monday ahead of Trump’s swearing-in ceremony inside the Capitol Rotunda.
The official presented the gender order as part of a policy “defending women from gender ideology extremism and restoring biological truth to the federal government.”
The order aims to require that the federal government use the term “sex” instead of “gender,” and mandates that Cabinet secretaries “ensure that official government documents, including passports and visas, reflect sex accurately.”
The order will also prevent taxpayer funds from being used for gender-transition health care and add “privacy in intimidate spaces” in facilities such as prisons, migrant shelters and rape shelters.
Trump campaigned on rolling back protections for transgender people and emphasized the issue in television advertisements, including a commercial that aired frequently in key swing states such as Pennsylvania.
The second order detailed by the incoming White House official aims to end “radical and wasteful government DEI programs and preferencing” inside the federal government.
The official said the new administration will hold monthly meetings with the deputy secretaries of key agencies to “assess what type of DEI programs are still discriminating against Americans and figure out ways to end them.”
In recent years, Trump and conservatives have assailed DEI initiatives across American society, characterizing them as discriminatory.
In the weeks leading up to Trump’s return to power, major corporations such as Meta, McDonald’s and Walmart have announced they are ending some or all of their diversity practices.
Trump is set to take office at 12 p.m. ET Monday.
In a shocking move, President Trump is set to sign a series of executive orders that will proclaim there are only two biological sexes, male and female, and halt diversity programs in government agencies and institutions.This controversial decision is sure to spark outrage among LGBTQ+ advocates and supporters of diversity and inclusion. It is a clear attempt to roll back progress made in recognizing and protecting the rights of transgender and non-binary individuals.
By denying the existence of more than two biological sexes, the Trump administration is perpetuating harmful stereotypes and erasing the experiences of countless individuals who do not fit within the traditional gender binary.
Furthermore, halting diversity programs will only serve to further entrench systemic inequalities and discrimination in our society. These programs are essential in promoting equal opportunities for marginalized communities and fostering a more inclusive and equitable workplace.
It is crucial that we stand up against these discriminatory and regressive policies and continue to fight for the rights and dignity of all individuals, regardless of their gender identity or expression. Let your voice be heard and join the fight for a more just and inclusive society. #ProtectTransRights #DiversityMatters
Tags:
- Trump executive orders
- Biological sexes
- Diversity programs
- Trump administration
- Gender identity
- LGBTQ rights
- Social policy
- Presidential actions
- Gender discrimination
- Equality initiatives
#Trump #sign #executive #orders #proclaiming #biological #sexes #halting #diversity #programs