Tag: heard

  • “I had never heard of him” – Shaq was baffled after being “completely destroyed” by Christian Laettner in college


    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=4KqIfY_0yZh22Rz00

    Shaquille O’Neal had an outstanding college season in 1990-91. In 28 games for the Louisiana State Tigers, he averaged 27.6 points on a remarkable 62.8 percent shooting, along with 14.7 rebounds and 5.0 blocks.

    Shaq’s dominance was undeniable, earning him prestigious honors like AP Player of the Year and UPI Player of the Year. However, even the future basketball superstar wasn’t untouchable. One rare example of this came during a February 1991 matchup when he was outperformed by another NCAA big man: Christian Laettner.

    “Diesel” recalled their first encounter in his 2011 memoir ” Shaq Uncut: My Life ,” admitting that he was “completely destroyed” and even “embarrassed” by the Duke Blue Devil. What surprised him even more was the fact that he had been completely unfamiliar with Laettner before that game.

    “I had never heard of him,” O’Neal wrote. “I remember asking, “Who the hell is this guy?”

    A humbling game at Cameron Indoor

    According to Shaq, the aforementioned matchup took place in Durham, North Carolina. Up to that point, he was averaging 27 points per game and leading the nation in rebounding with an impressive 15 boards per game. Unsurprisingly, the 7’1″ center became the primary focus of the Blue Devils’ defense.

    Laettner , then in his third college season, later described containing LSU’s star player as a “big challenge” for him and his teammates — one they were eagerly “looking forward to.”

    At Cameron Indoor Stadium in North Carolina, “Diesel” not only faced relentless defensive pressure but also endured the intensity of a hostile crowd, determined to unsettle him with their chants. As the New Jersey native later admitted, their efforts worked.

    “It was like a high school gym — very loud,” he reflected after his disappointing performance. “The crowd was a factor.”

    From the opening tip-off, Shaq seemed off his game, scoring only four points in the first half. To make matters worse, he ran into foul trouble, prompting LSU head coach Dale Brown to bench him for 10 minutes.

    This breather didn’t provide much relief, as the then-18-year-old continued to struggle with his rhythm upon returning to the court. LSU ultimately lost 88-70, and O’Neal ended the game with just 15 points, tying his season low — a mark he had also previously recorded earlier against the Auburn Tigers. On the positive side, he managed to secure 10 rebounds, completing a double-double.

    Related: “You just had to have amnesia” – Grant Hill says Kobe Bryant was the only player he guarded who had no weakness

    “Best player, best team”

    While “The Big Aristotle” had a performance to forget, Laettner, on the other hand, shone, “fundamentally undressing” him, as the Los Angeles Lakers legend recalled in his book.

    “He back-doored me to death and walked off with 24 points and 11 boards,” added “Diesel.”

    Indeed, the Blue Devils big, who was the game’s leading scorer, put on a show. Several factors contributed to his success.

    On defense, Laettner and his Duke teammates managed to contain Shaq. The loud support from the crowd likely fueled their strength, and their defense was already top-notch.

    “I consider myself and my team good defensive players, especially when we’re on a mission,” Laettner said after the game.

    On offense, Christian was relentless, constantly attacking Shaquille. Though his first shot was blocked by his opponent, after a few more attempts, this aggressiveness got O’Neal into foul trouble — following a strategy that then-Blue Devil Brian Davis later shared.

    “We just said we were all going to attack him (O’Neal) and not buy into all the hype,” said the former swingman.

    Overall, this dominant performance, spearheaded by Laettner, earned praise from all sides, even from the opposing coach, Brown.

    “They just neutralized Shaquille. Laettner is the best player, and they’re the best team we’ve faced this year,” he said. “We’ve played Arizona, Indiana, and Kentucky this year, and Duke is the best.”

    True to these words, the Blue Devils, led by Mike Krzyzewski, proved it by winning the NCAA Championship in both 1991 and 1992.

    Shaq’s revenge

    Knowing the competitive nature of O’Neal, he couldn’t just let being outplayed like that slide. From then on, he made it a point to “keep an eye” on Laettner. Even better, the 2001 MVP soon had the chance to get his revenge.

    Shaq recalled this happening in his “final year” at LSU before entering the NBA Draft in 1992. However, he strained his calf muscle just a week before the game.

    “I was really sore, but I had to play,” recounted the four-time NBA champion. “People were talking about Laettner and Georgetown center Alonzo Mourning with a little more breath than they were about me, and I couldn’t have that. I just had to be the No. 1 pick.”

    True to his word, one of the greatest big men of all time taped up his calf and went through with it.

    “I took it to Laettner. Hard. I dropped 25 and 12 on him and I blocked seven shots… I’ll never forget Laettner’s face when I was dunking on him. He looked terrified. I was talking all sorts of trash to him, too,” remembered “Diesel.”

    There was definitely a rivalry between the two NCAA big men, with both having their say in it.

    On one side, Laettner had the edge in team success, also leading the Blue Devils to a comeback win in that game. Additionally, the New York native won the Naismith and Wooden Awards ahead of O’Neal, which Shaq didn’t take too well, as he shared in his book. Finally, Late was selected over his rival for the iconic “Dream Team” in 1992.

    On the other side, “The Big Aristotle” became the top draft pick a few months later, selected by the Orlando Magic , while Laettner was “only” taken third by the Minnesota Timberwolves.

    Near the end of their respective NBA careers, both players eventually teamed up with the Miami Heat for the 2004-05 campaign. It was during this time that Shaquille, who had always harbored a dislike and jealousy towards Duke players, came to realize that Christian was actually a “really nice guy.”

    Related: “His health was already affecting us in those last two seasons” – Kobe believed the Lakers would not have sustained their dynasty even if Shaq had stayed



    Growing up, Shaquille O’Neal was a dominant force on the basketball court. But there was one player who completely baffled him during his college years – Christian Laettner.

    In a recent interview, Shaq admitted that he had never heard of Laettner before facing off against him in college. And boy, was he in for a surprise.

    Laettner, who played for Duke University, absolutely destroyed Shaq and his LSU team in the NCAA tournament. Shaq couldn’t believe the skill and finesse that Laettner displayed on the court, completely outplaying him in every aspect of the game.

    Looking back, Shaq now realizes the talent and impact that Laettner had in college basketball. And while he may have been caught off guard by Laettner’s talent at the time, he has nothing but respect for the player who gave him a run for his money.

    It just goes to show that sometimes, the most unexpected opponents can be the ones to leave the biggest impression. And for Shaq, Christian Laettner will always be the player who made him rethink what it means to be truly great on the basketball court.

    Tags:

    1. Shaquille O’Neal
    2. Christian Laettner
    3. College basketball rivalry
    4. Shaq vs Laettner
    5. NCAA basketball upset
    6. Basketball legends
    7. College sports history
    8. March Madness upset
    9. Shaq baffled
    10. Christian Laettner dominance

    #heard #Shaq #baffled #completely #destroyed #Christian #Laettner #college

  • Troy Aikman says he hasn’t heard from the NFL about his officiating criticism


    ESPN’s Troy Aikman pulls no punches when it comes to officiating blunders. And despite the league’s tendency toward the supersensitive when it comes to criticism of officials, Aikman says he’s never gotten any blowback from 345 Park Avenue.

    “I never have,” Aikman told Jimmy Traina of SI.com. “I’ve never heard from the league.”

    It’s possible that the league doesn’t raise its concerns to Aikman directly (as it should), but that it instead whines to his bosses instead. (Which has happened elsewhere. I’m told.)

    Aikman realizes the job isn’t easy, but difficulty of profession doesn’t operate as insulation from criticism.

    “I know the officials have a tough job,” Aikman told Traina. “The scrutiny that they’re under, as we’ve gotten more advanced with instant replay, those guys, it seems, have become more and more scrutinized.

    “And the game has not become less controversial. It’s become more controversial. But then I just think we are at a point, and this is tipped a little bit because the league is partners with a number of these gambling services. So here you are promoting gambling, people are gambling more than they have ever before and those types of calls, there’s a lot at stake regardless, but especially when you’re considering there’s a lot of money that’s changing hands with these calls as well.

    “So, I think that we owe it to the fans that we get it right, and I think that we are at a point and time where we can. We can get it more right. That was my position and just trying to lean on the NFL and say, ‘Hey, we gotta fix this. We gotta address this in the offseason.’”

    He’s right. In late 2023, Cowboys owner Jerry Jones argued that the two teams in a given game submit to the possibility that the game’s outcome will be influenced by a bad call (which is always a good call for the other team). But as the NFL continues to profit from all things betting, those who have wagered on games aren’t making that same deal.

    They don’t want to lose a wager based on a bad call. And, eventually and inevitably, there will be a sports-betting scandal that turns the NFL upside down.

    Until it happens, the NFL will keep jamming sports books dollars inside its pockets. While also spending as little as possible to eliminate officiating errors.



    Former NFL quarterback and current Fox Sports analyst Troy Aikman recently spoke out about his frustration with the officiating in the NFL, but he says he hasn’t heard from the league about his comments.

    In an interview on a sports radio show, Aikman criticized the inconsistency of the officials and questioned their ability to make the right calls on the field. He also expressed concern about the impact that bad officiating could have on the integrity of the game.

    Despite his outspoken comments, Aikman says he hasn’t received any communication from the NFL regarding his criticism. He stands by his remarks and believes that it’s important to hold the officials accountable for their actions.

    It remains to be seen if the league will address Aikman’s concerns or if they will continue to ignore his remarks. In the meantime, Aikman remains a vocal advocate for improving the officiating in the NFL.

    Tags:

    Troy Aikman, NFL, officiating, criticism, NFL criticism, Troy Aikman criticism, sports news, NFL news, NFL officiating, NFL controversy

    #Troy #Aikman #hasnt #heard #NFL #officiating #criticism

  • Lompoc protesters rallying against ICE to make their voices heard


    LOMPOC, Calif. – As ICE agents continue operations in Hispanic neighborhoods across the Central Coast, community members are mobilizing in protest against the agency. Rallies are planned in multiple locations, including Lompoc and Santa Barbara, as concerns grow over recent immigration enforcement actions.

    ICE sightings have been reported in San Luis Obispo, Lompoc, Santa Barbara, Goleta, and Oxnard within the past week. These sightings have fueled a wave of protests, with residents demanding change and voicing their opposition to ongoing deportation efforts.

    Protests against ICE have been ongoing across the county since President Trump issued an order to remove and deport undocumented immigrants from the United States. In response, demonstrators are taking to the streets to challenge the enforcement actions and advocate for immigrant rights.

    One protest is scheduled for this afternoon at 5:00 p.m. at the Milpas Roundabout in Santa Barbara.

    Another demonstration will take place in Lompoc at 9:00 a.m. and will continue throughout the weekend until Sunday. Organizers emphasize that their goal is to make their voices heard and support those who fear speaking out due to the risk of ICE raids.

    Protest organizer Alexia Miranda shared her motivation for participating by saying, “I thought it would be a good idea to have our voices heard. I know there are many people who are too scared to speak out due to fear of ICE raids. I want to be a voice for those in my community, especially with my Mexican background.”

    Supporter Andrea Pelagio echoed the sentiment stating, “It’s not about people having papers. It’s not about people being here legally right now. It’s about human life—people being removed from their work, their livelihood. People are just trying to live and have better opportunities.”

    On Thursday, Congresswoman Julia Brownley addressed the situation, demanding greater transparency from ICE. She acknowledged the agency’s role in national security but expressed concerns over recent enforcement operations.

    Meanwhile, public opinion remains divided. A recent Reuters poll found that 48% of Americans approve of President Trump’s immigration policies, while 41% disapprove.



    Lompoc protesters rally against ICE to make their voices heard

    In a show of solidarity and resistance, residents of Lompoc gathered outside the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office to protest the agency’s controversial practices. Chanting slogans and holding up signs that read “No human is illegal” and “Families belong together,” the protesters made their voices heard loud and clear.

    Many of the demonstrators expressed outrage over ICE’s treatment of undocumented immigrants, citing reports of inhumane conditions in detention centers and the separation of families at the border. They called for an end to ICE raids and deportations, and demanded that the agency be held accountable for its actions.

    Local activists and community leaders spoke at the rally, urging their fellow residents to stand up against injustice and support immigrant rights. They emphasized the importance of solidarity and compassion in the face of adversity, and encouraged everyone to take action to create a more just and inclusive society.

    The protest drew a diverse crowd of supporters, including students, families, and concerned citizens from all walks of life. As the sun set on the peaceful gathering, the message was clear: Lompoc stands united against ICE and in support of immigrant communities everywhere.

    Tags:

    • Lompoc protesters
    • ICE protest
    • immigration rally
    • Lompoc activism
    • social justice movement
    • grassroots protest
    • voices heard
    • community activism
    • human rights advocacy
    • solidarity demonstration

    #Lompoc #protesters #rallying #ICE #voices #heard

  • Cochran trial: Closing arguments heard Tuesday afternoon, jury deliberations to take place Wednesday morning


    BECKLEY, W.Va. — Jury deliberations begin Wednesday morning in the murder trial of former Raleigh County pharmacist Natalie Cochran.

    Natalie Cochran (WVRJA)

    The jury heard closing arguments from the prosecution and the defense throughout the course of the afternoon Tuesday before Judge H.L. Kirkpatrick adjourned the court until 9 a.m. Wednesday.

    Cochran is accused of giving a lethal dose of insulin to her husband, Michael Cochran, 38, in 2019 once he began raising questions about the Ponzi scheme she was operating through the couple’s defense contracting business.

    In her closing argument, Raleigh County assistant prosecuting attorney Ashley Acord said this was a pre-meditated murder.

    “This woman, Natalie Cochran, feloniously, willfully, maliciously, deliberately, and with pre-meditation killed her husband, Michael Cochran,” Acord said.

    The state rested its case last Wednesday after bringing in Forensic Pathologist Dr. Paul Uribe, who concluded, after conducting a second autopsy of Michael Cochran’s body, that he died from insulin.

    On Monday, the defense rested after their expert witnesses, Forensic Pathologists Ljubisa Dragovic and Dr. Prya Banerjee, said Cochran’s death was “undetermined and undeterminable.”

    Defense attorney Matthew Victor said on Tuesday that the prosecution does not have the appropriate amount of evidence to convict.

    “The state cannot answer or prove beyond reasonable doubt the ‘how, how did that happen? How did this murder happen?” Victor said.

    Victor, in his closing argument Tuesday, also brought up that Michael Cochran had been taking over two dozen supplements per day, as testified by the couple’s juvenile son. Victor also brought up claims that Michael Cochran was receiving supplements from out of the country, some of which were not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

    Natalie and Michael Cochran

    On Monday, Natalie Cochran turned her head in court as a photo of her husband’s body was shown after his remains were exhumed.

    Victor says that this is not a murder, but rather a tragedy.

    “Not for a moment should you think that the defense is taking his death lightly,” Victor said. “It’s a horrible tragedy, but a tragedy, not a murder.”

    Meanwhile, Acord believes the evidence is there for the jury to convict. In her final remarks, she brought up the fact that Cochran did not aid her husband or take him to the hospital right after he had gone unconscious in February 2019.

    Early in the trial, it was determined Cochran had a vial in her refrigerator months after her husband’s death, which was tested and determined to contain insulin.

    “Natalie Cochran had the means, knowledge and opportunity to commit this crime,” Acord said.

    The trial is being streamed on Court TV.



    The highly anticipated closing arguments in the Cochran trial were heard on Tuesday afternoon, bringing an end to weeks of intense courtroom drama. The prosecution and defense both made their final appeals to the jury, laying out their theories of the case and urging the jurors to come to a just verdict.

    The prosecution argued that the evidence presented throughout the trial clearly pointed to the defendant’s guilt, painting a picture of a cold-blooded killer who meticulously planned and executed the crime. They emphasized the testimony of key witnesses and the forensic evidence that linked the defendant to the scene of the crime.

    On the other hand, the defense made a passionate plea for the jury to consider the possibility of reasonable doubt. They pointed to inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case and raised questions about the reliability of certain witnesses. The defense argued that the defendant was being unfairly scapegoated and that there were other potential suspects who were not adequately investigated.

    Now, as the trial enters its final phase, the jury will begin deliberations on Wednesday morning to decide the fate of the defendant. The outcome of this high-profile case hangs in the balance, with the hopes and fears of both the prosecution and defense resting on the shoulders of the twelve jurors.

    Stay tuned for updates as we await the verdict in the Cochran trial.

    Tags:

    Cochran trial, closing arguments, jury deliberations, legal proceedings, court case, legal system, trial updates, verdict, criminal justice, legal news

    #Cochran #trial #Closing #arguments #heard #Tuesday #afternoon #jury #deliberations #place #Wednesday #morning

  • Justin Baldoni heard apologizing to Blake Lively in ‘It Ends With Us’ audio message: ‘I am far from perfect’




    CNN
     — 

    Justin Baldoni is heard apologizing to his co-star Blake Lively in an audio message apparently sent to Lively amid production of their film “It Ends with Us,” long before the two stars launched into a legal battle that continues to play out in the public eye.

    In a nearly seven-minute voice note first published by TMZ on Monday, Baldoni, who also directed the film, is heard discussing some script changes Lively, who was a producer, presented to him.

    Lively and Baldoni starred as the central couple in “It Ends With Us,” which explores themes of intimate partner violence based on characters from Colleen Hoover’s hit 2016 novel of the same name.

    “I want to start with an apology. Man, reading the second part of your message, my heart sank and I’m really sorry. I, for sure, fell short and you worked really hard on that,” Baldoni said in the voice note. “I feel really grateful that you feel safe enough to tell me that that’s how you feel and share that with me. And I’m really sorry. I f***ed up. That is a fail on my part.”

    Baldoni continued: “I am far from perfect. I’m a very flawed man, as my wife will attest….but I will always apologize and then find my way back to center. That is one thing I can assure you of. And I’m sorry I made you feel that way, that must have felt terrible.”

    CNN has not been able to independently verify the voice memo’s authenticity, but Baldoni mentions at one point that his message is being sent at 2 a.m.

    CNN has reached out to representatives for Lively and Baldoni for comment.

    baldoni.png

    Video shows Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively’s outtakes on the set of ‘It Ends With Us’

    02:57

    Baldoni and Lively have been in a legal battle that began in December, when Lively accused him of sexual harassment and retaliation in a complaint first filed with the California Civil Rights Department, preceding a lawsuit that followed about a week later.

    Baldoni, meanwhile, has sued Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds, alleging that the Hollywood couple attempted to “destroy” him after Lively accused him of harassment during production of the film, which he has denied.

    A trial date has been set in New York for March 9, 2026, according to the Associated Press.

    Baldoni’s lawsuit claims that Lively sought to take over much of the film’s creative direction, including having Reynolds re-write a scene and make “unauthorized changed to the script in secret.” (Reynolds had no formal role on “It Ends With Us.”)

    The suit claims that Lively “summoned” Baldoni to the penthouse she shares with Reynolds in New York City for a meeting about the script, where Reynolds, along with a “megacelebrity friend” of the couple, praised Lively’s proposed revisions to the script.

    Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively star in IT ENDS WITH US.

    “As the meeting was ending, a famous, and famously close, friend of Reynolds and Lively, walked into the room and similarly began praising Lively’s script,” the lawsuit states. “Baldoni understood the subtext: he needed to comply with Lively’s direction for the script.”

    One of the text messages included in Baldoni’s suit appears to show an exchange between Baldoni and Lively about the script: “I really love what you did. It really does help a lot. Makes it so much more fun and interesting. (And I would have felt that way without Ryan and Taylor),” he wrote with a wink emoji. “You really are a talent across the board. Really excited and grateful to do this together.”

    While Baldoni’s text message does not include a last name for “Taylor,” Lively is close friends with the artist Taylor Swift. CNN previously reached out to representatives for Baldoni, Lively, Reynolds and Taylor Swift to inquire whether the “Taylor” mentioned in Baldoni’s text is, in fact, Swift.

    In one of Lively’s text messages in Baldoni’s suit, the actress makes reference to her friends, stating, “If you ever get around to watching ‘Game of Thrones,’ you’ll appreciate that I’m Khaleesi, and like her, I happen to have a few dragons.”

    CNN has also not independently verified the text messages included in either Baldoni or Lively’s lawsuits.

    It is not clear at what point in the discussions about the script changes Baldoni’s voicemail was sent, but he adds at one point, “damn, right, you’ve got great friends.”

    “If that’s how you felt and they knew that, and f**k, we should all have friends like that, aside from the fact that they’re two of the most creative people on the planet. The three of you guys together is unbelievable. Talk about energy and just to force, all three of you,” he said. “But I just wanted you to know that I didn’t need that, because it’s really good and it’s gonna make the movie sing, like you said, and and I’m excited to go through the whole movie with you. I’m just excited to spend time with you.”

    Last week, Baldoni’s legal team released about 10 minutes of footage from the set of “It Ends With Us” they said supports his claim he acted with “respect and professionalism” toward Lively during the project. The two costars are seen filming a slow dance referenced in Lively’s lawsuit against Baldoni, in which she cited instances of what she characterized as inappropriate behavior by him.

    In response, a representative for Lively said “every frame of the released footage corroborates, to the letter, what Ms. Lively described in Paragraph 48 of her Complaint.”

    Baldoni has also sued the New York Times for $250 million, accusing the newspaper of working alongside Lively’s team to publish a one-sided article that benefited Lively and contained doctored evidence.

    The New York Times has denied Baldoni’s allegations and said it stands by their reporting.



    In a recent audio message released by actor Justin Baldoni, the star can be heard apologizing to his former co-star Blake Lively. The message, which was leaked online, features Baldoni expressing remorse for past actions and acknowledging his imperfections.

    In the heartfelt message, Baldoni can be heard saying, “I am far from perfect, and I know that I have made mistakes in the past. I want to apologize to you, Blake, for any hurt or harm that I may have caused you. You deserve nothing but love and respect, and I am truly sorry for falling short of that.”

    The apology comes as a surprise to many fans, as Baldoni and Lively have not publicly addressed any past conflicts or issues between them. However, the message has sparked speculation about the nature of their relationship and has left fans wondering what may have transpired between the two actors.

    As the audio message continues to circulate online, fans are eagerly awaiting a response from Lively to see how she will address Baldoni’s apology. In the meantime, many are applauding Baldoni for taking accountability for his actions and showing vulnerability in his apology to his former co-star.

    Tags:

    Justin Baldoni, Blake Lively, It Ends With Us, audio message, apology, imperfection, celebrity news, entertainment gossip, Hollywood, relationship drama

    #Justin #Baldoni #heard #apologizing #Blake #Lively #Ends #audio #message #perfect

  • ‘We’re here, we’re queer, and we’re going to be heard’: Activists rally as Idaho lawmakers seek to challenge same-sex marriage ruling


    LGBTQ+ rights advocates protested at the Idaho State Capitol after lawmakers approved a memorial calling for the reversal of federal same-sex marriage protections.

    BOISE, Idaho — Dozens of LGBTQ+ rights advocates rallied at the Idaho State Capitol Sunday to protest a legislative petition that calls on the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn its landmark same-sex marriage ruling.

    The demonstration came four days after the House State Affairs Committee approved a memorial asking the high court to reverse its 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.

    “One day, I want to marry someone that I love just as much as my counterparts,” said one of the rally organizers, Cole Lancaster. 

    Lancaster said his dreams of marriage feel increasingly threatened in his home state.

    State lawmakers backing the memorial argue that marriage regulations should be determined at the state level rather than by federal mandate.

    “I don’t think marriage is a fundamental right,” said Heather Scott, the petition’s sponsor. “It’s not the federal government’s job to figure out what’s going on in Idaho.”

    Scott said the goal isn’t to take away rights but rather to transfer conversations like same-sex marriage to the state level so Idaho lawmakers can decide for themselves. 

    “What we’re encouraging is that these discussions happen within the state, with our local people, instead of through the federal government,” Scott said. 

    But protesters expressed deep skepticism about putting their marriage rights in the hands of state legislators. Many wrote letters to lawmakers explaining what their marriages and equal rights meant to them personally.

    “Our marriages don’t affect anyone else,” Lancaster said. “We’re here, we’re queer, and we’re going to be heard, and we’re not going anywhere.”

    Protesters vowed to continue fighting against the memorial and any other attempts to roll back marriage equality.

    “We’re telling people in the Capitol building that we don’t want this initiative to continue any further,” Lancaster said. 



    In a recent move that has sparked outrage among the LGBTQ+ community, lawmakers in Idaho have introduced a bill that aims to challenge the legality of same-sex marriage in the state. In response, activists have come together to rally under the banner of “We’re here, we’re queer, and we’re going to be heard.”

    The proposed bill, known as HB 396, seeks to nullify the 2014 federal court ruling that legalized same-sex marriage in Idaho. This move has been met with fierce opposition from advocates of LGBTQ+ rights, who see it as a blatant attack on the progress that has been made in achieving marriage equality.

    “We will not stand idly by while our hard-fought rights are threatened,” said one activist at the rally. “We have come too far to allow discriminatory legislation to turn back the clock on marriage equality.”

    The rally, which drew a large crowd of supporters, featured speeches from community leaders, allies, and individuals directly impacted by the potential repeal of same-sex marriage rights. Chants of “Love is love” and “Equality for all” echoed through the streets as demonstrators made their voices heard.

    As the fight for LGBTQ+ rights continues, activists are determined to stand firm in their commitment to equality and justice. “We will not be silenced,” declared one speaker. “We will continue to fight for our rights, our love, and our families. We’re here, we’re queer, and we’re going to be heard.”

    Tags:

    • LGBTQ rights
    • Same-sex marriage
    • Idaho activists
    • Marriage equality
    • LGBTQ community
    • LGBTQ activism
    • Idaho lawmakers
    • Marriage equality ruling
    • LGBTQ rights rally
    • LGBTQ rights activism

    #queer #heard #Activists #rally #Idaho #lawmakers #seek #challenge #samesex #marriage #ruling

  • Have you heard? Shroud frags for his dad, and chess gets a rules update


    Each week, we handpick a selection of stories to give you a snapshot of trends, updates, business moves, and more from around the creator industry. This week, there’s a new Twitch charity drive joining the Mafiathon, a new channel for a disgraced pop star, and a new rule in chess.

    Creator commotion

    Shrould raises over $100,000 with month-long Fragathon. The streamer known for playing tactical shooters like Valorant and Counter-Strike is spending the whole month of January raising funds for St. Jude’s. The Fragathon is personal for Shroud; his father passed away from lung cancer about two years ago.

    Alex Cooper’s Unwell Network ventures onto YouTube. The Call Her Daddy host has made a play in the podcast world with a media company that partners with popular creators. Unwell is now bringing that operation to YouTube, where a short-form series led by Kierra Lewis is among the initial offerings.



    In the latest news from the gaming world, popular streamer Shroud has made headlines for an incredibly heartwarming reason. In a recent stream, Shroud showcased his exceptional gaming skills by pulling off some impressive frags in honor of his late father. The emotional moment left fans both amazed and touched by Shroud’s gesture, showing that even in the competitive world of gaming, there is always room for sentiment and love.

    In other news, the game of chess has recently received a rules update that is shaking up the traditional gameplay. The update includes new strategies, moves, and variations that are sure to challenge even the most seasoned players. With these changes, the game of chess is evolving and becoming more dynamic than ever before, proving that even a centuries-old game can still surprise and excite players.

    So, have you heard about Shroud’s heartfelt frags for his dad and the latest updates in the world of chess? These stories show that gaming and traditional games alike continue to captivate and inspire players around the world. Stay tuned for more updates and exciting news from the gaming community!

    Tags:

    Shroud frags, Shroud gaming, gaming news, chess rules update, Shroud father, gaming community, esports news, Shroud Twitch, online gaming, gaming updates

    #heard #Shroud #frags #dad #chess #rules #update

  • For Jack Nicklaus’s 85th Birthday, Some Stories You Perhaps Haven’t Heard


    JUNO BEACH, Fla. — Jack Nicklaus tuned in to the opening night of TGL, curious just like the rest of the world. But during a commercial break, he switched over to the Golf Channel, where he stumbled upon … himself.

    It just so happened that a replay of the 1994 Shell’s Wonderful World of Golf match between Nicklaus and Arnold Palmer was on the screen. Nicklaus asked his wife, Barbara, what she preferred.

    “She said she wanted to watch me,” Nicklaus said, chuckling.

    And so it was that Nicklaus didn’t get back to TGL that night.

    Celebrating his 85th birthday Tuesday, the Golden Bear remains as comfortable in his own skin as just about any superstar, one who has been part of the public consciousness for better than 60 years. This year marks 20 years since his true competitive career came to an end in St. Andrews, where Nicklaus curled in a final birdie putt at the Old Course in 2005.

    On this day, just a few miles from where TGL is played at the SoFi Center in Palm Beach Gardens, Jack was in his Nicklaus Families office, where he goes frequently, a few golf course design plans on his desk, plenty of mementos around the room—but not like his North Palm Beach home office, where all of his major trophies reside.

    Nicklaus is still active in design, has a role with the local Cognizant Classic as it benefits the Nicklaus Children’s Hospital in Miami, and will later this year celebrate the 50th playing of the Memorial Tournament, an event he founded at a course he designed—Muirfield Village—near his hometown in Ohio.

    Getting to talk to Nicklaus on all things Jack remains a fascinating experience.

    And he shared a few stories, perhaps some that are lesser known among all the exploits of his career that saw him win 18 major championships and 73 PGA Tour events.

    For example, did you know that Nicklaus seriously considered remaining an amateur?

    The year was 1961 and he had won his second U.S. Amateur earlier this year. Nicklaus was working in insurance while still at Ohio State and seriously contemplated trying to achieve stardom while not playing for pay.

    Jack Nicklaus 1978 Sportsman of the Year cover

    When Jack Nicklaus was named Sportsman of the Year, he posed with the U.S. Amateur trophy in addition to his major trophies. / Lane Stewart/Sports Illustrated

    There was the matter of his father Charlie’s affection for the legendary Bobby Jones, who won 13 majors if you count his five U.S. Amateurs and one British Amateur. And Nicklaus saw some merit in continuing in that manner.

    “Basically, I had no intentions of being a pro,” Nicklaus says. “Bobby Jones was my dad’s hero and sort of my hero. As I grew up, I was sort of following his footsteps a little bit. I won the second (Amateur) at Pebble Beach in ’61 and all of a sudden there was a bunch of rumors.”

    Nicklaus, who finished second to Palmer as an amateur in 1960 at the U.S. Open and tied for fourth a year later, says he consulted with Joe Dey, then the executive director of the United States Golf Association (who would later become the first PGA Tour commissioner), and man he had a relationship going back to his junior days when Dey admonished him for nearly missing a tee time. “I was never late for one ever after that,” he says.

    Dey counseled Nicklaus that “he had every right to turn pro,” if he wanted. And thus Nicklaus did some investigating. He contacted agent Mark McCormack, who told Nicklaus that he had the potential to make about $100,000 a year off the course, on top of his prize winnings.

    “That was quite a bit more than I was making,” Nicklaus says. “I was pretty successful at what I was doing but I can’t say I really loved insurance.

    “I finally got to thinking if I really want to be the best at the game of golf, there’s only one way to do it, and that’s to play against the best on a weekly basis. So I changed my mind and I called Joe Dey and told him what I was going to do. He was like a second father and always gave me great advice.”

    And if he hadn’t turned pro?

    “I would have played whatever was available to me,” he says. “I was playing eight or nine events anyway. I was the U.S. Amateur champion. (He could pretty much get in where he wanted except the PGA Championship.) If I was going to play on a fairly solid basis, I needed to play. You need to prepare and you need to play. You can’t do something halfway.”

    So Nicklaus declared in November his pro intentions, and started 1962 playing in events on the West Coast, famously making $33.33 in his first start at the Los Angeles Open.

    He played in San Diego and Pebble Beach and San Francisco and Palm Springs and Phoenix, never missing a tournament because “if you made the cut back then, you got to play the next week.”

    In his first Masters as a pro, Nicklaus tied for 15th, 11 shots out of the playoff won by Arnold Palmer over Gary Player and Dow Finsterwald.

    A few weeks later came another Nicklaus story that might not be well known—what happened during the final round of the Houston Open.

    Nicklaus found himself in a playoff that Bobby Nichols won over himself and Dan Sikes. But he should have won the tournament outright, he says.

    “I was leading in the last round and on the 7th hole (a par-3) my caddie, his name was Billy Ford—we called him 4-1 for throwing the dice,” Nicklaus says. “I had about a 30-foot putt and he was holding the pin. After I putted, he couldn’t get the pin out (of the cup.) And so he yanked it and the cup came out with it.

    “My ball hit the cup dead square. So instead of making a 2, I made 5. It was a two-shot penalty for hitting the pin. So I had made a 5 instead of a 2 and ended up tied. True story. And 4-1 caddied for me again the next year. It wasn’t his fault. It just happened.”

    In June of that year, Nicklaus defeated Palmer in an 18-hole playoff at the U.S. Open to win for the first time as a pro, one of three victories that season in which he was named rookie of the year. He played 26 times, with three wins, three seconds and four thirds. Nicklaus said some of the older players scoffed when he suggested he might be able to make $30,000 in prize money; he earned $61,868.

    Through 1968, Nicklaus piled up 27 victories including six major championships and had established himself among the elite in the game.

    That year also saw significant change come to the pro game, a contentious and somewhat controversial move to have touring pros separate from the PGA of America. Nicklaus, Palmer and Gardner Dickinson believed that the organization was too big and not looking out for the interests of pro golfers—different than club pros—who competed around the country.

    Perhaps not well known is that Nicklaus was right in the middle of it.

    “Yeah, it was controversial,” Nicklaus says. “Back in those days, when you signed your entry form to play in a tournament, you were signing over your rights to the PGA of America, for endorsements, the whole bit. That didn’t mean you couldn’t probably do it. But they could contest it to let you play. We just felt like we wanted to have our own rights. Arnold, Gardner Dickinson and I were on the (PGA player) board. We tried to work it out. The PGA of America didn’t want to work it out. So we headed in our own direction.”

    The Association of Tournament Players was formed and eventually led to it being called the PGA Tour.

    Nicklaus said the situation then was not unlike what Phil Mickelson cited a few years ago as being a problem for professional golfers as it related to their own media rights, which is part of the backstory to the formation of LIV Golf.

    “The only difference in what Mickelson was bitching about is today guys are making a lot of money and a good living,” Nicklaus says. “We couldn’t make a lot of money (playing tournament golf). Even through most of my career, we had to be able to go out and win golf tournaments to be able to make a name to go make a living.

    “Today they can make a living playing golf. Which is fantastic. We were the forerunners of that. The PGA Tour was part of making that happen. And guys obviously make very good money on the PGA Tour today. It was similar to that.”

    Nicklaus said he’s intrigued by what TGL can be and understands it might appeal more to a younger audience. But he never got back to watching it that night, sticking with the replay of the Shell’s match, which was at Pinehurst No. 2, the site of last year’s U.S. Open and, then, still five years away from hosting the championship for the first time.

    Final score: Jack 67, Arnold 74.


    1. The time Jack Nicklaus hit a hole-in-one on a par 4: In a charity exhibition match in 1963, Nicklaus shocked the crowd by hitting a hole-in-one on a par 4 at the 17th hole. This rare feat solidified his reputation as one of the greatest golfers of all time.
    2. The time Jack Nicklaus won the Masters with a broken putter: In 1966, Nicklaus famously won the Masters using a putter that he had broken earlier in the round. Despite the setback, Nicklaus managed to sink crucial putts and secure his second green jacket.
    3. The time Jack Nicklaus played a round of golf with President Gerald Ford: In 1974, Nicklaus played a round of golf with President Ford at Augusta National Golf Club. The two men bonded over their love of the game and shared stories about their experiences on the course.
    4. The time Jack Nicklaus designed a golf course for his grandchildren: In 1991, Nicklaus designed a golf course in Ohio specifically for his grandchildren to learn and play the game. The course, named "The Bear’s Club," has since become a popular destination for golfers of all ages.
    5. The time Jack Nicklaus made a surprise appearance at a junior golf tournament: In 2005, Nicklaus surprised young golfers at a junior tournament by showing up to offer advice and encouragement. His presence inspired the next generation of golfers to strive for greatness on the course.

    Tags:

    1. Jack Nicklaus 85th birthday
    2. Golf legend Jack Nicklaus
    3. Jack Nicklaus birthday celebration
    4. Rare stories about Jack Nicklaus
    5. Jack Nicklaus unknown facts
    6. Celebrating Jack Nicklaus’s legacy
    7. Iconic golfer Jack Nicklaus
    8. Jack Nicklaus milestones
    9. Remembering Jack Nicklaus
    10. Jack Nicklaus unforgettable moments

    #Jack #Nicklauss #85th #Birthday #Stories #Havent #Heard

  • Ice Quakes heard across Central Missouri


    Many Mid-Missouri residents ranging from Jefferson City and Columbia, all the way east towards St. Louis have reported hearing loud bangs and crash sounds over the past 24 hours. These loud sounds are due to something referred to as ice quakes or frost quakes which occur during abrupt cooldowns.

    Water located within the deeper layers of the ground, freezes at quicker rates than usual due to such a substantial drop-off in temperatures as arctic air has filtered across the Midwest. This freezes cause the water to expand as it becomes ice.

    This expansion then forces outward causing cracks in the frozen ground due to the pressure. These sound waves travel through the different layers of the ground before bring a loud bang noise to those on the surface.

    These ice quakes/ frost quakes are harmless and are far too weak to register on the Richter Scale. Thankfully, this phenomenon doesn’t occur very often so many people will not have to worry about this occurring into the second half of the week as temperatures look to rise.

    BE PART OF THE CONVERSATION

    ABC 17 News is committed to providing a forum for civil and constructive conversation.

    Please keep your comments respectful and relevant. You can review our Community Guidelines by clicking here

    If you would like to share a story idea, please submit it here.



    Residents across Central Missouri reported hearing loud booms and feeling vibrations as a series of ice quakes shook the region early this morning. The phenomenon, also known as cryoseisms, occurs when water seeps into the ground and freezes, causing the soil to expand and create pressure that eventually releases in the form of a sudden tremor.

    Many residents took to social media to share their experiences, with some describing the sound as similar to a sonic boom or an explosion. Others reported feeling their homes shake and seeing objects rattle on shelves.

    While ice quakes are relatively rare in this area, they can occur during periods of extreme cold weather when the ground is saturated with water. Experts advise residents to stay calm and not to panic if they experience an ice quake, as they are typically harmless and do not cause any significant damage.

    Have you ever experienced an ice quake? Share your stories in the comments below.

    Tags:

    • Central Missouri ice quakes
    • Missouri ice quake phenomenon
    • Natural ice quakes in Missouri
    • Central MO ice quake reports
    • Understanding ice quakes in Missouri
    • Ice quake activity in Central Missouri
    • Missouri seismic ice events
    • Central MO winter ice quakes
    • Investigating ice quakes in Missouri
    • Central Missouri ice quake research

    #Ice #Quakes #heard #Central #Missouri

  • Women’s claims of sexual abuse must be heard – unless they’re about master storyteller Neil Gaiman, apparently | Marina Hyde


    Draw near, allies, for these are dark days for “kink-shaming”. At best, this is one of the whiniest, most pathetic and least helpful phrases to have entered the parlance of modern times – and at worst, it’s just another guy’s excuse for sexual abuse. It’s confusing. You try to be modern and post-conventional, and you end up enabling the most old-fashioned and conventional nastinesses of all.

    Still, thank heavens for the parade of embattled famous men fighting kink-shaming’s corner. I have just one thing to say to all the lady authors, lady pop stars and lady actors out there. And that is: if you haven’t had an eye-wateringly expensive lawyer draft a statement about how consensual your sex with a tormented junior was, then are you really properly creative at all?

    Fighting out of a Brooklyn detention centre, we have the rapper Sean “Diddy” Combs, who is on remand facing sex trafficking charges and about 120 lawsuits alleging drugging and sexual abuse, including of teenagers and minors. He denies the charges, some of which relate to his so-called freak-off parties. This week, Diddy’s lawyer’s take on the multiple federal charges was that the US government was trying “to police non-conforming sexual activity”. “The prosecution of Mr Combs is both sexist,” this lawyer hazarded, “and puritanical.” Righto.

    Elsewhere, we have actor and oil scion Armie Hammer, #MeTooed back in the day over a number of sexual abuse and coercion allegations, plus a little light cannibalism talk – which he says was like being “left standing there naked in front of the world with all of your proclivities or kinks being judged by the world”. Despite police reports, no charges were brought, and Armie now observes of his downfall that “people were my bags of dope with skin on it”. Ah, ye olde sex addict, hoovering up his chosen substance – women – that just happens to have “skin on it”.

    Meanwhile, Channel 4 is currently showing a documentary on the rock star Marilyn Manson, who has successfully ridden out years of grim abuse allegations, including by his much younger former partner, Evan Rachel Wood. The documentary contains some previously unaired interview footage, in which Manson declares: “I’m not into rape whatsoever … I prefer to break a woman down to the point where they have no choice but to submit to me. Rape is for cowards, for lazy people.” Certainly for other people.

    But arguably the newsiest one this week concerns the author Neil Gaiman, subject of what might have been last summer’s dam-breaking Tortoise podcast, Master. Except, there are some dams that people – and fandoms – are hugely invested in keeping intact. It has taken till now for the follow-up, courtesy of New York Magazine, in the form of an investigation entitled There Is No Safe Word, which features eight young women alleging sexual assault, coercion and misconduct by Gaiman, six of them on the record.

    Gaiman denies anything was non-consensual, and says that the claims contain “descriptions of things that happened sitting beside things that emphatically did not happen”. He has remained largely hidden behind lawyers since the allegations surfaced last year, with one of these legal eagles telling Tortoise that “sexual degradation, bondage, domination, sadism, and masochism may not be to everyone’s taste, but between consenting adults, BDSM is lawful”. Was boundaried BDSM what was going on? The alleged victims say no, and they say it at complex length in the New York investigation.

    Take the story told by Scarlett Pavlovich. Even unconventional people end up needing conventional things such as childcare, which Gaiman and his ex-wife Amanda Palmer seem to have decided was best obtained by asking women who were also fans. Aged 24, Pavlovich has arrived for her first day of work at Gaiman’s – he is 61 – to discover the child is in fact on a playdate. She has only known the author for a couple of hours when he suggests she takes a bath in his outdoor tub while he’s on a work call. Minutes after, he appears naked, and joins her, swiftly beginning to stroke her feet. According to the New York Magazine report, she tells him “she was gay, she’d never had sex, she had been sexually abused by a 45-year-old man when she was 15. Gaiman continued to press.” Indeed, he does so to the point of anal penetration. “Then he asked if he could come on my face, and I said ‘no’ but he did anyway. He said, ‘Call me “master”, and I’ll come.’ He said, ‘Be a good girl. You’re a good little girl.’” She goes home to Google #MeToo and Neil Gaiman. Yet in time, she also goes back to Gaiman and Palmer’s houses. And months later, a vulnerable young adult without a home and estranged from her own family, she is still stuck in this toxic cycle. And has still never been paid for all the childcare.

    In our era, people have righteously debunked the myth of the perfect victim – but less so the myth of the perfect perpetrator. The perfect perpetrator is an evil stranger – yet sexual abuse is overwhelmingly likely to be carried out by someone you know, who you may be related to or in a relationship with, and who is pretty nice to you some of the time. These are complex and inconvenient truths, but they are truths.

    Furthermore, there are perfect perpetrators in the public imagination. Harvey Weinstein, once he was exposed, was the perfect perpetrator. Physically repulsive – hey, it is what it is – and not actually famous in the world outside his professional community, he was the kind of 2D scumbag no civilian could possibly be invested in. People in the normal world will always be incalculably more relaxed about the exposure of a movie producer, a job they instinctively regard as commoditised, than they will be about losing any kind of artist, a job whose works have affected them over the course of many years. Perhaps this is why many fans of the master storyteller Neil Gaiman are refusing to listen to the less appealing, less magical accounts of those women who allege he took advantage of them.

    As for Neil himself, I see Gaiman still can’t let go of the allyship argot, which frequently feels performative and knackered, but in the circumstances of this case comes off as actively ludicrous. Finally breaking the silence on Thursday, Gaiman said that he hadn’t commented thus far on the multiple, months-long stream of allegations, some of which he had allegedly sought to silence via NDAs, “out of respect for the people that were sharing their stories”.

    Sharing their stories, if you please! Neil: some of them have “shared their stories” with Auckland and Devon and Cornwall police. Are you attempting to be an “ally” to your own alleged victims? Either way, great to find you holding space/checking your privilege for them. You’ll note that people like Neil even react to sexual abuse allegations in a superior way. Honestly, I’m feeling somewhat lesser, here. I’ve literally never given $60,000 or $275,000 to people I haven’t sexually assaulted so that I can – hang on, let me get my reading glasses on – help them get therapy/“make up some of the damage”. Having said that, I have always paid my nanny via PAYE, and have never attempted to have sex with her. I recommend it.

    • Marina Hyde is a Guardian columnist

    • Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.



    In a recent article for The Guardian, columnist Marina Hyde discusses the troubling trend of dismissing women’s claims of sexual abuse when they involve beloved figures like Neil Gaiman. Hyde highlights the recent allegations made against the acclaimed author and how they have been met with skepticism and backlash from fans.

    Hyde argues that the #MeToo movement has made significant strides in giving women a platform to speak out against their abusers, but when those abusers happen to be well-known and respected figures, their victims are often silenced or discredited. This double standard only serves to perpetuate a culture of misogyny and protect powerful men at the expense of survivors.

    The article calls for a reexamination of how we handle allegations of sexual abuse, particularly when they involve individuals with large followings or cultural influence. Women’s voices must be heard and their experiences validated, regardless of who the accused may be.

    Hyde’s powerful commentary serves as a reminder that justice and accountability should not be selective – all claims of sexual abuse deserve to be taken seriously and thoroughly investigated, no matter who the perpetrator may be.

    Tags:

    1. Women’s claims of sexual abuse
    2. Neil Gaiman controversy
    3. BelieveWomen

    4. Marina Hyde opinion
    5. Sexual assault allegations
    6. MeToo movement
    7. Victim shaming
    8. Media bias
    9. Gender equality
    10. Justice for survivors

    #Womens #claims #sexual #abuse #heard #theyre #master #storyteller #Neil #Gaiman #apparently #Marina #Hyde