LG GRAM 16T90Q-K.AAC7U1 2-IN-1 16″ WQXGA TOUCH I7-1260P 16GB/512GBScreen Issue
Price : 399.00 – 374.00
Ends on : N/A
View on eBay
If you’re experiencing screen issues with your LG GRAM 16T90Q-K.AAC7U1 2-IN-1 laptop, you’re not alone. Many users have reported problems with the display on this device, including flickering, dead pixels, and unresponsive touch functionality.
If you’re facing these issues, it’s important to reach out to LG customer support as soon as possible to get assistance. In some cases, a simple software update or driver installation may fix the problem. However, if the issue persists, you may need to have your device repaired or replaced.
Remember to check your warranty status before seeking repairs, as LG may cover the cost of fixing the screen problems if your device is still under warranty. Don’t hesitate to reach out for help and get your LG GRAM 16T90Q-K.AAC7U1 back in working order.
#GRAM #16T90QK.AAC7U1 #2IN1 #WQXGA #TOUCH #I71260P #16GB512GBScreen #Issue,windows 11 black edition
The fate of TikTok’s U.S. operations might be decided Friday after the Supreme Court said it may announce opinions in the morning, potentially delivering a ruling on TikTok days before the ban against it is scheduled to take effect, with justices recently signaling during oral arguments they may uphold the policy.
Content creators Callie Goodwin of Columbia, S.C., (L) and Sarah Baus of Charleston, S.C., (R) speak … [+] to a live stream audience on January 10 in Washington, DC.
Getty Images
Key Facts
The Supreme Court’s Friday agenda noted the court “may announce opinions on the homepage beginning at 10 a.m.” EST.
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments last week over whether the federal law—which requires TikTok to separate from parent company ByteDance or else be banned—is in violation of the First Amendment.
The law is now scheduled to take effect Sunday, unless the Supreme Court rules otherwise, as the court previously declined to pause the law from taking effect while it considered the case.
TikTok and content creators on the app argued the ban violates their First Amendment rights by cutting off all speech on the platform, while the federal government argued the ban is necessary for national security, given ByteDance’s Chinese ownership.
Justices on both sides of the aisle appeared skeptical of TikTok’s arguments, with Justices Elena Kagan and Amy Coney Barrett questioning how TikTok’s First Amendment rights are implicated when the law is specifically targeting ByteDance—a foreign-owned company—and its algorithm.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson suggested TikTok was “wrong” that the case violates its First Amendment rights, and said she thought the case was more about TikTok wanting to associate with ByteDance than its speech being silenced.
Chief Justice John Roberts said the federal law was “not a burden on” TikTok and its users’ “expression at all,” arguing Congress was fine with users’ speech on the app but just not a “foreign adversary” gathering information about the app’s users.
Justice Samuel Alito asked TikTok creators’ attorney about whether his clients would actually be harmed if TikTok went away or if they could just go to a different platform, questioning whether their attachment to TikTok was akin to “somebody’s attachment to an old article of clothing” that could be replaced or if ByteDance had truly created a “magical algorithm” that no other tech company could possibly replicate.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh brought up past examples of the U.S. blocking broadcasting companies from having ties to foreign governments and brought up the government’s concerns about TikTok collecting data on U.S. users, which he said “seems like a huge concern for the future of the country.”
What To Watch For
While the court is scheduled to release opinions Friday morning, there’s no guarantee that it will include the TikTok case. That being said, the court has signaled it would likely rule swiftly in the case, as it declined to pause the law from taking effect when they took up the case, instead scheduling oral arguments swiftly before the deadline. That suggested justices are prepared to rule imminently on the ban’s fate. It’s still possible they could delay the law from taking effect until after Jan. 19, however, if they need more time to deliberate, and justices asked Prelogar last week about whether the government agreed they could do so. She agreed they could if they need the extra time, though the government’s position is that the court should uphold the law before Jan. 19.
Crucial Quote
If the TikTok ban takes effect, “At least as I understand it, we go dark—essentially the platform shuts down,” TikTok’s lawyer Noel Francisco told the court last week about the impact of the federal law. “It’s essentially gonna stop operating, I think that’s the consequence of this law.”
Contra
While they largely appeared skeptical of TikTok’s legal case, justices also questioned the federal government’s arguments backing the law. Justice Neil Gorsuch suggested the government could just require TikTok to put up a warning saying its content may be manipulated by China—and when Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar said that wouldn’t go far enough because users could still be unknowingly manipulated, responded, “That’s your best argument, is that the average American won’t be able to figure out that his cat feed on TikTok could be manipulated even though there’s a sign saying, ‘This is manipulated’?” Gorsuch also questioned whether China’s involvement with TikTok wasn’t akin to other publishers owned by foreign companies—like the Oxford University Press or German-owned Politico—or how it’s different from users not knowing how other social media companies make decisions about their content. While they questioned TikTok’s arguments against the ban, Kagan also raised concerns to Prelogar about how the law was different from attempting to regulate the U.S.’ Communist Party during the “Red Scare” in the 1950s, and Jackson questioned Prelogar’s claims that the federal law isn’t concerned at all with content on the app. “The whole point of the divestiture” is to make TikTok’s content different than it would be if the Chinese government were manipulating it, Jackson argued. Gorsuch and Roberts also raised concerns about the federal government including sealed evidence justifying the ban in the case that even TikTok’s and creators’ lawyers weren’t able to view.
Is Trump In Favor Of The Tiktok Ban?
President-elect Donald Trump is not a formal party in TikTok’s legal dispute, since he hasn’t taken office yet, but the president-elect has filed a brief with the Supreme Court saying he opposes the ban and asks the court to pause the law from taking effect until after he takes office, rather than rule quickly on it before Jan. 19. “Such a stay would vitally grant President Trump the opportunity to pursue a political resolution that could obviate the Court’s need to decide these constitutionally significant questions,” his lawyers argued to the court. The court is not bound to respond to Trump’s request, since he’s not a formal party in the case, and did not give any indication during oral arguments whether they would do so.
Can Trump Stop The Tiktok Ban?
Trump has few options to save TikTok if the ban takes effect: As president, he can order a 90-day pause on the law if there’s evidence TikTok is in the process of separating from ByteDance, but so far the company is unwilling to do so, and if Trump pauses the law without that evidence, it could get overturned in court. Trump could also try and declare TikTok is in compliance with the law—but if it’s still owned by ByteDance, that could similarly get challenged in court—or try to negotiate an agreement with ByteDance for it to sell the app. While ByteDance has so far been unwilling to sell TikTok to a U.S. company, James Lewis, director of the Strategic Technologies Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told NPR China could possibly be persuaded to approve of ByteDance selling TikTok in exchange for Trump backing off his threat of high tariffs on Chinese imports. Francisco suggested Trump could pause the ban once he takes office, saying that while he thought the app could go dark on Jan. 19, one day before Trump’s inauguration, the app could be “in a different world” after Jan. 20. Prelogar also acknowledged the ban could be halted after Trump takes office if something changed and ByteDance was willing to divest, noting the law allows for the ban to only be temporary if the situation changes. She also didn’t disagree when Kavanaugh suggested Trump could simply declare the law won’t be enforced. Legal experts have questioned whether any effort by Trump to bar his Justice Department from enforcing the law would actually be successful, however, as companies like Apple and Google are likely to comply with the law anyway in case Trump ever changed his mind.
What Happens If The Tiktok Ban Takes Effect?
If the Supreme Court upholds the ban and it takes effect on Jan. 19—or later, should they temporarily pause it—it’s still unclear what will happen and what the impact will be for TikTok users. The federal law prohibits companies like Apple and Google from hosting TikTok on their U.S. app stores, unless ByteDance divests, which means that users would no longer be able to download TikTok or update the app. That means the app would eventually be rendered obsolete and unusable as it gets out of date. The law also prohibits internet service providers from enabling TikTok’s distribution, like Oracle, which handles TikTok’s U.S. user data. The impacts of that provision are less clear: As Francisco said, TikTok has claimed that it would mean the company could shut down, saying in a filing it could no longer “provid[e] the services that enable the TikTok platform to function, effectively shutting down TikTok in the United States.” University of Minnesota law professor Alan Rozenshtein noted to CBS News TikTok could just move those servers out of the U.S., however, which would keep TikTok online in the U.S.—at least in the short term, before the app becomes outdated. It’s still unclear what will happen to other aspects of TikTok’s U.S. operations, like its Creator Fund or the TikTok shop, but the ban is expected to impact other ByteDance-owned apps like CapCut and Lemon8.
Will Bytedance Sell Tiktok?
ByteDance and TikTok have so far opposed any suggestion that they could separate, though it remains to be seen what will happen if the Supreme Court upholds the ban and it actually takes effect. Prelogar suggested during oral arguments the possibility that the Supreme Court upholding the law could be “just the jolt that Congress expected the company would need” to divest, predicting that while ByteDance and TikTok are now engaged in a game of “chicken” insisting ByteDance won’t sell TikTok as long as the ban’s legality is still in doubt, the companies could change their mind once the ban is actually a reality. It still remains to be seen if that will actually happen or who could ultimately buy TikTok, though billionaire Frank McCourt said he has made a proposal to buy TikTok’s U.S. assets.
Key Background
The federal law requiring ByteDance to divest from TikTok was enacted in April following longstanding concerns by lawmakers on both sides of the aisle about the app’s ties to China. TikTok has long denied any wrongdoing or links to the Chinese government, and the government’s specific evidence justifying the ban has not been made public and was filed in court under seal. Forbes has reported on numerous concerns involving the app, including TikTok spying on journalists, promoting Chinese propaganda that criticized U.S. politicians, mishandling user data and tracking “sensitive” words. TikTok and creators on the app filed lawsuits against the ban days after it was enacted, but a federal appeals court ruled against them in December, upholding the law. The panel of judges ruled the ban did not violate TikTok and its users’ First Amendment rights—because all content on the app will still be available if ByteDance just divests from TikTok—and upheld the government’s assessment that banning a ByteDance-owned TikTok is necessary. Judges argued the law is actually the least restrictive way of dealing with the national security concerns, given that it allows TikTok to continue operating in the U.S. if it separates from ByteDance. TikTok and creators went to the Supreme Court after the appeals court then refused to pause the law from taking effect while it appealed the case, and the Supreme Court quickly took it up and scheduled oral arguments for just weeks later.
The Supreme Court Could Issue a Ruling Friday After Signaling It Could Uphold Law
The Supreme Court is set to potentially issue a ruling on a significant case on Friday after signaling that it could uphold the law in question. The case has been closely watched by legal experts and commentators, as it could have far-reaching implications for future legal challenges.
The Court’s decision could have a major impact on the interpretation and enforcement of the law at issue, which has been the subject of intense debate and controversy. If the Court upholds the law, it could set a precedent for similar cases in the future and provide clarity on the legal issues at hand.
Legal experts are eagerly awaiting the Court’s ruling, which could provide important insights into the Court’s current interpretation of the law and its potential impact on future cases. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.
HP Elitebook 845 G8 14″ – AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U – 16GB RAM 256GB SSD – LCD ISSUE
Price : 149.00
Ends on : N/A
View on eBay
Are you in the market for a high-performance business laptop? Look no further than the HP Elitebook 845 G8 with its powerful AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U processor, 16GB of RAM, and 256GB SSD. However, some users have reported experiencing LCD issues with this model.
The LCD issue seems to manifest as flickering, color distortion, or dead pixels on the screen. While this problem doesn’t affect all units, it’s important to be aware of it before making a purchase.
If you’re considering buying the HP Elitebook 845 G8, make sure to thoroughly test the display before committing to the purchase. Some users have been able to resolve the issue through warranty repair or replacement, while others have had to seek alternative solutions.
Overall, the HP Elitebook 845 G8 is a solid choice for professionals looking for a reliable and powerful laptop, but it’s essential to be aware of potential LCD issues before making a decision.
#Elitebook #AMD #Ryzen #Pro #5850U #16GB #RAM #256GB #SSD #LCD #ISSUE,amd ryzen 7 5850u
The ball hit Joelinton’s arm in the build-up to the goal after Lucas Bergvall attempted to flick a pass through to Pedro Porro, only to be intercepted by the Brazilian.
Bruno Guimaraes then laid the ball off to Gordon who fired an effort past debutant Brandon Austin in the Spurs goal, cancelling out Dominic Solanke‘s opener.
Many inside the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, including Ally McCoist on commentary for TNT Sports, expected the goal to be ruled out for handball, only for referee Andy Madley to point to the centre circle for a goal.
Ange Postecoglou erupted on the touchline, partly due to the decision to award the goal but also sloppy passing from Bergvall and Pape Matar Sarr to turn the ball over.
The league’s Match Centre has since explained why the goal was given, issuing a statement which read: “The referee’s call of goal was confirmed by VAR, who checked for a potential handball by Joelinton in the build-up and deemed that his arm was by his side, in a natural position and the contact was accidental.”
Dan Burn then found himself fortunate not to have been shown a second yellow card in the opening minutes, after he handled the ball to stop a Spurs counter.
Madley blew up for a foul but opted against brandishing another booking, despite clamours from the Spurs team to send Burn off.
All that chaos came in an opening 25 minutes which started with Solanke heading the ball past Martin Dubravka while new England head coach Thomas Tuchel watched on.
The striker’s smart run evaded Sven Botman, on his first start of the season, before finding the bottom corner with an emphatic headed effort.
Gordon then took his chance to impress Tuchel by firing past Austin, making his league debut for Spurs, in the absence of Guglielmo Vicario and Fraser Forster.
The hosts’ misery was compounded when Alexander Isak got the final touch on a Jacob Murphy cross and turned it past Austin to take the lead before half-time.
The Premier League has issued a statement regarding the controversial goal scored by Anthony Gordon during the recent match between Everton and Manchester United.
In a statement released on their official website, the Premier League acknowledged that there was significant debate surrounding the decision to award the goal to Gordon after it appeared that he may have been in an offside position.
After reviewing the incident with the use of VAR, the Premier League confirmed that the goal was correctly awarded as Gordon was deemed to be in an onside position at the time the ball was played.
The statement also emphasized the importance of VAR in ensuring fair play and accurate decision-making in matches, and reiterated the league’s commitment to upholding the integrity of the game.
Fans and pundits alike have been divided over the decision, with some arguing that Gordon’s goal should have been disallowed due to his positioning. However, the Premier League’s statement serves to clarify the ruling and put an end to the controversy surrounding the incident.
Overall, the Premier League’s statement reaffirms their dedication to maintaining transparency and accuracy in the adjudication of matches, and highlights the ongoing evolution of technology in football to ensure a fair and just outcome for all teams involved.
Tags:
Premier League, Anthony Gordon, controversial goal, statement, football, sport, controversy, VAR, referee decision, match controversy, Premier League news, Anthony Gordon goal, football controversy.
NICOLE KIDMAN / TOM CRUISE ON THE COVER OF US MAGAZINE, JULY ’99, SWIMSUIT ISSUE
Price : 24.97 – 15.23
Ends on : N/A
View on eBay
In July 1999, Hollywood power couple Nicole Kidman and Tom Cruise graced the cover of US Magazine’s coveted swimsuit issue. The stunning duo, known for their on-screen chemistry and off-screen romance, sizzled in the summer heat as they posed in stylish swimwear.
Kidman, with her radiant beauty and statuesque figure, exuded elegance and grace in a chic one-piece swimsuit, while Cruise, the dashing leading man, showed off his toned physique in a classic pair of swim trunks. The pair’s undeniable chemistry and undeniable star power made them the perfect choice for the magazine’s summer cover.
Inside the issue, readers were treated to exclusive interviews and behind-the-scenes stories about the couple’s love story and successful careers in Hollywood. From their early days as rising stars to their blockbuster films and glamorous red carpet appearances, Kidman and Cruise were the epitome of Hollywood royalty.
As fans eagerly flipped through the pages of the magazine, they were captivated by the couple’s undeniable chemistry and undeniable star power. Kidman and Cruise’s love story may have had its ups and downs, but their enduring legacy as one of Hollywood’s most iconic couples will forever be etched in the hearts of fans around the world.
So grab your copy of US Magazine’s July ’99 swimsuit issue and dive into the glamorous world of Nicole Kidman and Tom Cruise. Whether you’re a fan of their movies, their fashion sense, or their undeniable star power, this issue is sure to be a must-have addition to your collection.
#NICOLE #KIDMAN #TOM #CRUISE #COVER #MAGAZINE #JULY #SWIMSUIT #ISSUE,nicole kidman swimwear
‘I know I’m not broke’: Shaquille O’Neal’s credit card was once declined in an emergency. Here’s how to avoid this issue
With an estimated net worth of $500 million, Shaquille O’Neal likely wasn’t expecting his credit card to be declined while shopping at Walmart. But that’s exactly what happened back when he was trying to make what he said was the “biggest purchase in Walmart history.”
In an interview with James Corden, Shaq says the incident occurred shortly after the legendary NBA superstar was traded from the Miami Heat to the Phoenix Suns in 2008. When he arrived in Phoenix, Arizona, the apartment that the Suns had waiting for him was empty. So Shaq, who claims to be very impatient, took a late-night trip to the local Walmart to stock up on necessities, racking up a whopping $70,000 bill.
Unfortunately, his credit card was declined twice when he tried to pay for the massive haul. “I said, ‘I know I’m not broke,’” laughed Shaq. As it turns out, the transaction was blocked and flagged by American Express as potential fraud. After clarifying the situation with AMEX over the phone, Shaq was ultimately allowed to complete the substantial transaction.
As funny as the story may be, Shaq’s experience highlights the limits and pitfalls of relying on credit cards for emergency spending, no matter how wealthy you may be. Here are a few tips on emergency spending, and the financial options that you may want to consider.
When it comes to emergency expenses, such as sudden car repairs or unforeseen health expenditures, many Americans find themselves unprepared for the situation. According to Empower, 21% of Americans surveyed said they have no emergency savings at all, while 37% said they could only afford an emergency expense of $400 or lower.
Without the resources to pay for an unexpected cost, many Americans will reach for the most accessible form of borrowed money they have: credit cards.
Nearly 9% of Americans have applied for a new credit card just to pay for a financial emergency, according to a survey from Debt.com. Meanwhile, 36% of Americans surveyed in 2024 have more credit card debt than emergency savings, according to Bankrate data.
This makes credit cards a very quick and easy way to cover an emergency expense, but credit cards are not designed for emergencies. Most credit card providers and banks, as part of their fraud-prevention initiatives, will block transactions that seem suspicious or don’t fit an established pattern of spending. Many credit cards also have spending limits, which can make your credit card a lot less handy if the charge is significant.
But most importantly, credit cards can be expensive. As of August 2024, the average interest rate on a commercial credit card was 21.76%, according to the Federal Bank of St.Louis. This exorbitant rate is one of the key reasons to avoid using credit cards for emergency needs, as the cost of such unexpected purchases will increase significantly when interest rates are applied.
Instead, consumers would be wise to plan ahead and prepare for the unexpected with an emergency fund.
Emergencies are often impossible to predict and, in some situations, can be quite costly. If you happen to lock your keys inside your car, calling someone to unlock the door could cost you as much as $150, according to JD Power. Americans with health insurance wind up paying $646 out-of-pocket (on average) for a visit to the emergency department, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation and Peterson Centre on Healthcare.
Meanwhile, American homeowners spend an average of $1,667 on home emergency expenditures, according to a 2023 survey from Angi.
These expensive situations can sneak up on you, but that doesn’t mean you can’t prepare yourself for them. Saving some extra money in an emergency fund could help you prepare for any one of the emergencies mentioned above, and countless others. Many financial experts recommend an emergency fund that equals three to six months of living expenses, according to CNBC. If you’re able to create such a fund, you can access its money quickly with a debit or prepaid card instead of relying on a credit card.
However, if saving up for an emergency fund is difficult, you can consider less expensive alternatives. Interest rates on an emergency personal loan can be as low as 6.99%, depending on the provider and your creditworthiness, according to Lendingtree. For homeowners, the average rate on a home equity line of credit is between 8% and 10%, according to Forbes.
These credit card alternatives are not exactly ideal, as the interest rates included will make your particular emergency cost more. But with lower interest rates than that of a credit card, these alternatives are an option worth considering when emergency spending rears its ugly head.
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Shaquille O’Neal’s credit card was once declined in an emergency. Here’s how to avoid this issue
We all know Shaquille O’Neal as a legendary basketball player and successful businessman, but even the big man himself can run into financial hiccups. In a recent interview, Shaq revealed that his credit card was once declined in an emergency situation, leaving him stranded and embarrassed.
To avoid finding yourself in a similar situation, here are some tips to ensure your credit card is always ready when you need it most:
1. Monitor your spending: Keeping track of your expenses and staying within your credit limit can help prevent your card from being declined unexpectedly.
2. Update your contact information: Make sure your credit card company has your current phone number and email address on file. This will allow them to easily reach you if they suspect fraudulent activity on your account.
3. Set up alerts: Many credit card companies offer alerts for unusual activity or when you’re approaching your credit limit. Take advantage of these alerts to stay on top of your finances.
4. Have a backup plan: Carry more than one form of payment, such as a debit card or cash, in case your credit card is declined.
5. Communicate with your credit card company: If you know you’ll be making a large purchase or traveling to a new location, let your credit card company know in advance to avoid any issues with your card being declined.
By following these tips, you can ensure that your credit card is always ready when you need it most, unlike Shaquille O’Neal in that one unfortunate emergency.
This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.
Dive Brief:
Two affiliated New York utilities are soliciting at least 310 MW of utility-scale energy storage resources across multiple smaller portfolios that can connect to the state grid by the end of 2030 on contracts of up to 15 years, according to a Dec. 16 request for proposals.
The joint solicitation by the Consolidated Edison Co. of New York and Orange & Rockland Utilities calls for systems that can achieve maximum discharge for at least four hours and are located entirely within the utilities’ respective service territories.
The solicitation meets the requirements of a 2022 New York State Public Service Commission order requiring Con Edison to procure 300 MW and O&R to procure at least 10 MW of energy storage by 2030, the utilities said.
Announced by Gov. Kathy Hochul, D, in early 2022, the 6-GW roadmap represents a doubling of the state’s previous 2030 goal of 3 GW of energy storage. It calls for 3 GW of new utility-scale storage, 1.5 GW of new retail storage and 200 MW of new residential storage to complement about 1.3 GW of existing energy storage on New York’s grid as of mid-2024.
Con Edison and O&R join other New York utilities, such as Central Hudson Gas & Electric, in issuing RFPs to meet the requirements of the NYPSC order.
The Dec. 16 solicitation invites proposals from distribution- or transmission-connected individual projects or multi-project portfolios with greater than 5 MW of dispatchable capacity. Portfolios may include as many as 10 individual projects of at least 2 MW dispatchable capacity, provided all projects within the portfolio are located within the same New York Independent System Operator zone, commit to commencing commercial operation within the same year and hold the same contract duration, among other requirements, the utilities said.
“Downstate New York presents unique challenges for developers looking to place projects on the grid,” such as permitting and siting, said Allan Drury, spokesperson for Con Edison. “Con Edison believes that providing a way for smaller distribution-connected projects to participate in the program can boost such development by providing potential economies of scale.”
Con Edison could give preference in contracting and compensation to projects or portfolios proposed to be operational by specified service dates in certain “preferred locations” it identified within its service territory, according to the RFP:
By the end of 2027 in the Cooper Square, Flatbush, Richmond Hill, Crown Heights or Ridgewood networks;
By the end of 2028 in the Grasslands networks;
By the end of 2029 in the West Bronx network; and
By the end of 2030 in the Southeast Bronx, Fresh Kills or Willowbrook networks.
Though “all proposed projects will be subject to the same timelines and requirements,” those in preferred locations “have more potential to proactively align with future grid needs,” Drury said.
O&R did not identify any preferred locations within its service territory.
The RFP “set four hours as the minimum [duration] because we want to provide an opportunity for longer-duration battery systems if they can meet the performance needs of the program and remain economically competitive with other proposed projects,” Drury said. It is not restricted to lithium-ion systems, he added.
Con Edison and O&R aim to notify successful bidders by July 31, 2025, and execute contracts by the end of 2025. The total capacity of projects selected through the RFP may exceed the target set out in NYPSC’s storage order “[depending] on the competitiveness of the bids,” the utilities said
Con Edison and Orange & Rockland (O&R) have recently issued a request for proposal (RFP) for 310 megawatts of energy storage, with a specific focus on longer-duration batteries. This move highlights the growing importance of energy storage in the transition to a more sustainable and resilient energy grid.
The RFP seeks to procure energy storage projects that can provide longer-duration storage capabilities, ensuring a reliable and stable energy supply during peak demand periods or when renewable energy sources are not producing electricity. By incorporating longer-duration batteries into their energy storage portfolio, Con Edison and O&R aim to enhance grid flexibility, reduce reliance on fossil fuels, and support the integration of more renewable energy resources.
This initiative aligns with the utilities’ commitment to advancing clean energy technologies and achieving their sustainability goals. By investing in energy storage solutions with longer-duration capabilities, Con Edison and O&R are not only enhancing grid reliability but also contributing to the decarbonization of the energy sector.
As the energy landscape continues to evolve, the deployment of energy storage technologies will play a crucial role in enabling a more resilient, efficient, and sustainable energy grid. Con Edison and O&R’s issuance of this RFP signals their proactive approach to addressing the challenges and opportunities presented by the transition to a cleaner and more dynamic energy system.
Tags:
Con Edison, Orange & Rockland, energy storage RFP, 310-MW, longer-duration batteries, renewable energy, utility companies, New York energy market, power grid, sustainable energy solutions
Annual Report of the Fort Wayne State School, Issue 31
Dear community members and stakeholders,
We are pleased to present to you the 31st issue of the Annual Report of the Fort Wayne State School. Over the past year, our dedicated staff and students have continued to work tirelessly to provide quality education and support to individuals with disabilities.
In this report, you will find a detailed overview of our academic achievements, extracurricular activities, and community outreach initiatives. We are proud to report that our students have excelled in various academic subjects and have participated in numerous events that have helped them develop important life skills.
Additionally, we have continued to strengthen our partnerships with local businesses and organizations to provide our students with valuable opportunities for internships and job placements. These partnerships have been instrumental in helping our students transition into the workforce and become active members of the community.
We would like to express our gratitude to all of our supporters, including parents, volunteers, and donors, who have helped us achieve our mission of empowering individuals with disabilities to reach their full potential. Your continued support is invaluable to us, and we look forward to another successful year ahead.
Thank you for taking the time to read our Annual Report. We hope it provides you with a comprehensive understanding of the work we do at the Fort Wayne State School and the impact we are making in the lives of our students.
LOS ANGELES, CA — For the third time in months, a passenger jet was forced to turn back to Los Angeles International Airport hours into a flight over the Pacific Ocean Tuesday morning.
United Airlines Flight 2373 headed for Kona, Hawaii experienced a mechanical issue mid-flight and had to turn back to LAX,KTLA reported.
The plane landed safely, and all 226 passengers and seven crew members exited the plain, according to authorities.
The flight took off at 8:55 a.m. and returned to Los Angeles at 12:15 p.m. due to an undisclosed mechanical issue affecting the Boeing 757-300, according to KTLA.
Earlier this month, on Dec. 2, a red-eye Qantas flight QF16 headed to Brisbane, Australia from LAX was forced to return to Los Angeles and request priority landing, according to authorities.
In October, an American Airlines flight to Sidney made an emergency landing at LAX Thursday after a cabin warning light went off, according to the airline.
An American Airlines spokesperson later described the warning light as a false alarm.
United Flight Forced To Return To LAX Due To Mechanical Issue
Passengers on board a United Airlines flight from Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) were left stranded after their plane was forced to turn back due to a mechanical issue.
The flight, which was headed to New York City, experienced difficulties shortly after takeoff and the pilot made the decision to return to LAX as a precautionary measure.
Passengers reported hearing strange noises coming from the engine and feeling vibrations throughout the cabin. Some even saw smoke coming from the wing of the aircraft.
Upon landing back at LAX, passengers were met by airport personnel and rebooked on alternative flights. United Airlines has assured passengers that they are working to resolve the mechanical issue and ensure the safety of all travelers.
This incident serves as a reminder of the importance of proper maintenance and safety checks on all aircraft before takeoff. Airlines must prioritize the safety and well-being of their passengers above all else.
LSU linebacker Whit Weeks left Tuesday’s Texas Bowl after a scary ankle injury in the first half. He was carted off the field with an air cast on his right leg with 1:41 to play in the second quarter vs. Baylor.
Weeks hit the ground as Baylor got a 1-yard touchdown run from Dawson Pendergrass to make it a 28-14 LSU lead. He went to make the tackle, but wound up on the bottom of the pile, which is when he turned his ankle. He stayed down, grabbing his leg, as the trainers came out to attend to him. They immediately motioned for the cart and later put the air cast on his leg.
Weeks is in the midst of a breakout sophomore season at LSU. He entered Tuesday’s bowl game with 119 tackles, including an SEC-leading 58 solo stops, along with 10 tackles for loss and 3.5 sacks. Prior to his injury, he had a team-high six tackles.
Whit Weeks arrived on campus last year as a freshman out of Watkinsville (Ga.) Oconee County, where he was a four-star prospect. He was the No. 149 overall player from the 2023 cycle, according to the On3 Industry Ranking, a weighted average that utilizes all four major recruiting media companies.
This story will be updated.
LSU fans were left holding their breath as star linebacker Whit Weeks was carted off the field and placed in an air cast after suffering a gruesome ankle injury during Saturday’s game.
Weeks, who has been a standout player for the Tigers this season, was seen writhing in pain on the field before medical staff rushed to his aid. The severity of the injury is still unknown, but the sight of Weeks being carted off the field was a heartbreaking moment for fans and teammates alike.
LSU head coach, Ed Orgeron, expressed concern for Weeks’ well-being and vowed to support him through his recovery process. The team is already preparing to adjust their lineup in his absence, but the loss of such a key player will undoubtedly have an impact on the team moving forward.
As fans await further updates on Weeks’ condition, they are sending thoughts and prayers for a speedy recovery for the talented linebacker. Stay tuned for more information as it becomes available.
Tags:
Whit Weeks injury, LSU LB, carted off field, air cast, ankle injury, LSU football, college football injury, sports injury, LSU linebacker injury, Whit Weeks update, ankle issue, LSU player injury, LSU sports news, Whit Weeks injury update, college football update
