Tag: Judgment

  • Adams County sheriff, current and former deputies, win $5 million judgment for wrongful termination by predecessor


    A federal jury found former Adams County Sheriff Rick Reigenborn was political and punitive and violated the First Amendment when he fired four top commanders after winning the 2018 sheriff’s election because they supported his opponent. The jury awarded the men $5 million on Tuesday.

    In the highly unusual case, current Adams County Sheriff Gene Claps and three other former top commanders who were working at the office in 2018 sued their own county commissioners for the wrongful terminations six years ago – even though they have all landed good jobs, or, in one case, even retired by now.

    In 2018, all of the men were supporting the incumbent sheriff Mike McIntosh, a Republican, for re-election. They donated to his campaign and showed up at campaign events.

    But Reigenborn, a Democrat, and a one-time department sergeant with no top command experience, surprisingly won the 2018 election in a political swing year. On Reigenborn’s first day in office, he summarily fired Claps and a handful of others for no reason other than their past political support, the jury found.

    Their lawyers spent nine days in a federal courtroom playing tapes, showing text messages and other documents to jurors proving Reigenborn’s intentions to get revenge on his political enemies when he was sworn in as sheriff. Reigenborn had lost the 2014 election to McIntosh and left the department.

    “He nursed a paranoid grudge for four years against Mr. McIntosh’s most prominent supporters,” said Iris Halpern, the attorney for the plaintiffs, from the firm Rathod Mohamedbhai. “When he won in 2018, Mr. Reigenborn wasted no time carrying out his personal vendetta, purging the command staff and cleaning house of McIntosh supporters.”

    The county’s attorneys countered in closing arguments that Reigenborn had the right to hire his own executive team, but that argument proved unconvincing to the jury.

    “The only thing that matters is whether his decision to terminate the employment of these four men violated the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. That’s it. That’s the only question. And it didn’t,” argued Katherine M.L. Pratt, with Thompson Coe, a private firm that represented the county. “This wasn’t about plaintiff’s political support for Mr. McIntosh. It was about how they treated their coworkers at the Adams County Sheriff’s Office.”

    The verdict is likely to resonate across Colorado, where the results of sheriff elections can carry political implications for deputies who are often drawn into campaigns whether they like it or not. 

    A CPR News investigation in 2022 found that Reigenborn abruptly locked top command staff out of the headquarters building after he was sworn in. After firing the top command staff, Reigenborn replaced them with officers from small departments around Colorado.



    In a groundbreaking victory, the Adams County sheriff, along with current and former deputies, have won a $5 million judgment for wrongful termination by their predecessor. This ruling not only vindicates the sheriff and his team but also serves as a powerful message against unjust actions in the workplace. Read on to learn more about this historic case and the impact it may have on the future of law enforcement. #AdamsCountySheriff #WrongfulTermination #JusticePrevails

    Tags:

    Adams County sheriff, wrongful termination, $5 million judgment, current deputies, former deputies, legal victory, law enforcement, civil lawsuit, justice served, employment rights, retaliation, wrongful dismissal, sheriff department, legal battle.

    #Adams #County #sheriff #current #deputies #win #million #judgment #wrongful #termination #predecessor

  • Rudy Giuliani testifies at contempt hearing as lawyers for election workers pursue $148M judgment

    Rudy Giuliani testifies at contempt hearing as lawyers for election workers pursue $148M judgment


    NEW YORK (AP) — Rudy Giuliani testified Friday at a contempt hearing to decide whether he has dodged and deceived lawyers trying to recover a $148 million judgment for two Georgia election workers, lamenting the speedy deadline imposed on him to turn over information about his assets.

    The former New York City mayor testified in Manhattan federal court that the two-week time frame he was given to respond to the requests “was very short,” in comparison to how long he was given to provide information in 15 to 20 other court cases he’s involved in.

    Judge Lewis J. Liman indicated he would not rule immediately on whether Giuliani will face civil sanctions for failing to turn over some assets.

    Giuliani asked Thursday if he could appear remotely at the hearing, but he changed his mind after the judge said his options at the proceeding would be limited if he didn’t show up in person.

    The lawyers claim Giuliani has displayed a “consistent pattern of willful defiance” of Liman’s October order to give up assets, after he was found liable in 2023 for defaming the poll workers by falsely accusing them of tampering with ballots during the 2020 presidential election.

    They said in court papers earlier this week that he has turned over a Mercedes-Benz and his New York apartment, but not the paperwork necessary to monetize the assets. And they said he has failed to surrender valuable watches and sports memorabilia, including a signed Joe DiMaggio shirt, and not “a single dollar from his nonexempt cash accounts.”

    Liman said in an order last week that Giuliani’s lawyer should be ready to explain why Giuliani should not be held in contempt with resulting sanctions that could make it less likely that he gets to keep his Florida residence. A trial over the disposition of the Palm Beach condominium and World Series rings is scheduled for mid-January.

    Giuliani has maintained that the Palm Beach property is his personal residence now and should be shielded from the judgment.

    Giuliani’s lawyers have predicted that Giuliani will eventually win custody of the items on appeal.

    ___

    Associated Press writer Larry Neumeister contributed to this report.





    Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, once known as “America’s Mayor” for his leadership after the September 11th attacks, found himself in a different kind of spotlight today as he testified at a contempt hearing. Giuliani, who served as former President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, was called to testify in a case brought by lawyers representing election workers who are seeking a $148 million judgment against him.

    The lawyers for the election workers allege that Giuliani spread false claims about widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election, leading to threats and harassment against them. They argue that Giuliani’s actions were reckless and that he should be held accountable for the harm caused to their clients.

    During the hearing, Giuliani maintained his innocence, claiming that he was simply exercising his First Amendment rights to free speech. However, the judge overseeing the case was not convinced, citing evidence that Giuliani knowingly spread misinformation and incited violence.

    As the hearing continues, the fate of Giuliani and the $148 million judgment hangs in the balance. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    1. Rudy Giuliani
    2. Contempt hearing
    3. Election workers
    4. $148M judgment
    5. Lawyer
    6. Testify
    7. Legal proceedings
    8. Election fraud
    9. Court case
    10. Legal battle

    #Rudy #Giuliani #testifies #contempt #hearing #lawyers #election #workers #pursue #148M #judgment

  • Expert Judgment and Expert Systems (Nato ASI Subseries F:) [Hardcover] Jeryl L..

    Expert Judgment and Expert Systems (Nato ASI Subseries F:) [Hardcover] Jeryl L..



    Expert Judgment and Expert Systems (Nato ASI Subseries F:) [Hardcover] Jeryl L..

    Price : 110.00

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    Expert Judgment and Expert Systems (Nato ASI Subseries F:) [Hardcover] Jeryl L.

    In this groundbreaking book, Jeryl L. provides a comprehensive overview of expert judgment and expert systems, focusing on their applications in various fields such as medicine, engineering, and finance. The book delves into the theory and practice of expert judgment, exploring the cognitive processes involved in making expert decisions and the factors that influence their accuracy.

    With the rise of artificial intelligence and machine learning, expert systems have become increasingly important in automating complex decision-making processes. Jeryl L. discusses the development and implementation of expert systems, highlighting their potential to improve efficiency, accuracy, and consistency in decision-making.

    Whether you are a researcher, practitioner, or student interested in expert judgment and expert systems, this book is a must-read. It offers valuable insights and practical guidance for leveraging expert knowledge and technology to enhance decision-making processes in various domains.
    #Expert #Judgment #Expert #Systems #Nato #ASI #Subseries #Hardcover #Jeryl

  • Expert Judgment and Expert Systems (Nato ASI Subseries F:) HC Mumpower 1987

    Expert Judgment and Expert Systems (Nato ASI Subseries F:) HC Mumpower 1987



    Expert Judgment and Expert Systems (Nato ASI Subseries F:) HC Mumpower 1987

    Price : 85.00

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    In 1987, HC Mumpower delved into the fascinating world of Expert Judgment and Expert Systems in the NATO ASI Subseries F. This groundbreaking work explores the intersection of human expertise and artificial intelligence, shedding light on how experts make decisions and how these decisions can be replicated and improved upon through the use of expert systems.

    Mumpower’s research highlights the importance of expert judgment in various fields, from medicine to finance to engineering. By studying the thought processes and decision-making strategies of experts, we can better understand how to build effective expert systems that can assist or even surpass human judgment in certain situations.

    This book is a must-read for anyone interested in the cutting-edge field of artificial intelligence and its applications in expert decision-making. Mumpower’s insights are sure to inspire further research and innovation in this rapidly evolving area of study.
    #Expert #Judgment #Expert #Systems #Nato #ASI #Subseries #Mumpower

  • Gears of War Judgment: VIP Season Pass – Xbox 360 Digital Code

    Gears of War Judgment: VIP Season Pass – Xbox 360 Digital Code


    Price: $19.99
    (as of Dec 20,2024 14:17:50 UTC – Details)



    Are you a die-hard fan of the Gears of War franchise? Do you want access to exclusive content and perks in Gears of War Judgment? Then look no further, because the VIP Season Pass is here for you!

    With the VIP Season Pass, you will unlock exclusive multiplayer maps, game modes, weapon skins, and character skins to enhance your gaming experience. Additionally, you will receive double XP for every match you play, allowing you to level up faster and dominate the battlefield.

    Don’t miss out on this opportunity to elevate your Gears of War Judgment experience to the next level. Purchase the VIP Season Pass Xbox 360 digital code today and get ready to show off your VIP status in the world of Gears of War!
    #Gears #War #Judgment #VIP #Season #Pass #Xbox #Digital #Code

  • Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment

    Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment



    Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment

    Price : 27.96

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment

    In the field of psychology, heuristics and biases play a crucial role in shaping our intuitive judgment. Heuristics are mental shortcuts that allow us to make quick decisions based on limited information, while biases are cognitive distortions that can lead us to make errors in judgment.

    One of the most well-known heuristics is the availability heuristic, which is the tendency to rely on information that is readily available in our minds when making decisions. For example, if we hear about a plane crash on the news, we may become more fearful of flying, even though statistically, flying is much safer than driving.

    Biases, on the other hand, can lead us to make irrational decisions based on faulty reasoning. One common bias is the confirmation bias, which is the tendency to seek out information that confirms our preexisting beliefs and ignore evidence that contradicts them. This can lead us to make poor decisions and reinforce our own biases.

    Understanding heuristics and biases can help us become more aware of the ways in which our intuitive judgment may be influenced by cognitive shortcuts and distortions. By being mindful of these psychological processes, we can strive to make more rational and informed decisions in our everyday lives.
    #Heuristics #Biases #Psychology #Intuitive #Judgment

Chat Icon