Tag: Justice

  • Innovative Red Carpet Style: Colman Domingo and Justice Smith Swap Boring Men’s Dress Shoes for Valentino Ballerina Flats

    Innovative Red Carpet Style: Colman Domingo and Justice Smith Swap Boring Men’s Dress Shoes for Valentino Ballerina Flats



    Title: Elevate Your Red Carpet Look with Valentino Ballerina Flats: Colman Domingo and Justice Smith Show Us How

    Are you tired of the same old boring men’s dress shoes on the red carpet? Look no further, because Colman Domingo and Justice Smith have found the answer to your fashion woes – Valentino Ballerina Flats. These stylish and comfortable flats are the perfect alternative to traditional dress shoes, giving your outfit a unique and modern touch.

    Join us as we explore how these Hollywood stars have effortlessly styled Valentino Ballerina Flats on the red carpet, proving that you don’t have to sacrifice style for comfort. Whether you’re attending a formal event or just looking to elevate your everyday look, these flats are sure to make a statement.

    Don’t let boring men’s dress shoes cramp your style any longer – step out in confidence with Valentino Ballerina Flats like Colman Domingo and Justice Smith.



    Tags:

    Colman Domingo, Justice Smith, Valentino Ballerina Flats, red carpet fashion, men’s fashion, designer shoes, stylish footwear, Hollywood style, celebrity fashion, red carpet events, Valentino shoes, men’s dress shoes, fashion trends

    #Colman #Domingo #Justice #Smith #Find #Answer #Boring #Mens #Dress #Shoes #Red #Carpets #Valentino #Ballerina #Flats

  • Supporters rally for Students for Justice in Palestine at UCLA protest

    Supporters rally for Students for Justice in Palestine at UCLA protest



    Title: “UCLA Protest: Students Rally in Solidarity with Students for Justice in Palestine”

    Post:
    On [Date], a powerful demonstration took place at UCLA as students gathered in support of Students for Justice in Palestine. The atmosphere was electric as passionate individuals came together to advocate for equality, peace, and justice.

    The protesters held signs calling for an end to oppression and discrimination, and marched through campus chanting slogans of solidarity. The event drew a large crowd of supporters who joined in the call for change.

    The demonstration not only served as a platform for raising awareness about the struggles faced by Palestinians, but also as a reminder of the importance of standing up for what is right. It was a powerful display of unity and activism that left a lasting impact on all who attended.

    As we reflect on the events of that day, let us remember the power of coming together and speaking out against injustice. Let us continue to support Students for Justice in Palestine and all those fighting for a better, more equitable world. #UCLAPROTEST #JusticeForPalestine #SolidarityStrong



    Tags:

    UCLA protest, Students for Justice in Palestine, demonstration, support, social justice, activism, university protest, Palestinian rights, advocacy, solidarity, campus activism, student activism, freedom of speech, human rights, Middle East conflict, political activism

    #UCLA #protest #Demonstration #held #support #Students #Justice #Palestine

  • As Trump targets federal law enforcement, will the justice system ever be the same?


    It is a phrase commonly attributed to Oscar Raimundo Benavides, Peru’s fascist dictator in the 1930s: “For my friends, everything; for my enemies, the law.” The Peruvian general, who first rose to power by way of a coup, used the phrase to summarize a straightforward authoritarian concept: Those aligned with the strongman who consolidated power can expect generous benefits; those opposed should expect to become targets of the state.

    In 2025, it’s a maxim with renewed significance in the United States.

    In the first week of Donald Trump’s second term as president, the Republican made his priorities clear by issuing sweeping pardons to Jan. 6 criminals, including violent felons who were in prison for assaulting police. In the president’s second week, Trump turned his attention from law-breakers to law-enforcers: As my MSNBC colleague Clarissa-Jan Lim reported, the White House fired multiple top FBI officials and federal prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases as part of a stunning Friday night news dump.

    Citing Trump’s sweeping pardon for Jan. 6 defendants, a letter firing multiple federal prosecutors stated that their role in the Jan. 6 prosecutions was the reason for their dismissal, NBC News reported. One of the fired prosecutors, a former assistant U.S. attorney who handled some of the Jan. 6 criminal cases, told Politico that 25 to 30 of his colleagues were fired and others were moved to different offices.

    The purge within federal law enforcement is very likely to intensify: Politico reported over the weekend, “Thousands of FBI agents and employees are being asked by Justice Department leadership to fill out a 12-question survey detailing their roles in investigations stemming from the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.”

    The purge, in other words, appears likely to get even worse.

    None of the FBI officials who’ve been fired — or those being considered for possible firings — have been credibly accused of wrongdoing. On the contrary, they did their jobs, did them well, and participated in the largest federal law enforcement effort in the history of the bureau, holding criminals responsible for an insurrectionist attack on the U.S. Capitol.

    Trump, the convicted felon who once vowed to make the Jan. 6 rioters “pay” for their crimes, has now decided not only to shield the criminals from accountability, but also to punish those who enforced the laws of his own country.

    It’s the latest in a series of dizzying developments related to Trump, his revenge tour, his White House team, and federal law enforcement. Indeed, over the last week, Americans have seen a series of related developments:

    All of this, of course, followed a series of pardons for criminals politically aligned with the White House, which came on the heels of earlier pardons for seven former GOP lawmakers convicted in corruption cases.

    Taken individually, the disparate stories are scary and infuriating in equal measure. But taken together, an even more unsettling image comes into view:

    They’re not disparate stories. They’re the same story.

    For my friends, everything; for my enemies, the law.

    Some of the White House’s partisan allies might be tempted to argue that this is a continuation of recent corruption. Those claims will be wrong: The Biden administration successfully prosecuted an incumbent Democratic senator, criminally indicted an incumbent Democratic congressman, searched the home of an incumbent Democratic mayor, launched an investigation targeting an incumbent Democratic congresswoman, and criminally indicted the incumbent Democratic mayor of the nation’s largest city.

    Team Trump’s campaign to kneecap the rule of law, in contrast has been fast, thorough and systematic.

    Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, said in a statement, “If allowed to proceed, Trump’s purge of our federal law enforcement workforce will expose America to authoritarianism and dictatorship.”

    The New York Times’ David French added, “There’s a very real question as to whether federal law will apply to Trump’s allies at all during Trump’s term. The atmosphere of impunity may be like nothing we’ve seen in our lifetimes.”

    It’s a critically important detail. The underlying message of Team Trump’s latest campaign against federal law enforcement is that Justice Department officials and the FBI need to exercise caution: If they try to hold Trump or his allies accountable for suspected crimes, the only people who’ll be punished are those who try to enforce the law.

    Similarly, Republicans aligned with the White House are receiving a related message: They can do as they please, without regard for legal limits, knowing that the president has created an accountability-free-zone for himself and those who agree to follow him.

    The result is a crisis unlikely any in modern American history. As Rachel explained during Friday’s show, in reference to the president and his team, “They are not trying to get rid of an investigation. They’re trying to get rid of American law enforcement as we know it. They are trying to get rid of the very idea of an independent, justice-is-blind system that makes America who we are.”

    Rachel added that we’re confronting a dynamic that would represent “an end to the idea that law enforcement pursues justice without regard to favors and preferences dictated by the people in power.”



    As Trump targets federal law enforcement, will the justice system ever be the same?

    In recent months, President Trump has taken aim at federal law enforcement agencies, including the FBI and Department of Justice, accusing them of bias and corruption. This raises concerns about the independence and integrity of the justice system.

    With Trump’s attacks on the credibility of these agencies, there are fears that public trust in the justice system may be eroded. The president’s attempts to undermine the legitimacy of investigations into his administration and allies have raised questions about the impartiality of law enforcement.

    Furthermore, Trump’s interference in high-profile cases, such as the Roger Stone and Michael Flynn prosecutions, have sparked outrage and accusations of political interference. This has led to concerns that the justice system is being manipulated for political gain.

    The implications of Trump’s actions on federal law enforcement are far-reaching and could have lasting effects on the justice system. The independence of law enforcement agencies is crucial for upholding the rule of law and ensuring justice is served fairly.

    As Trump continues to target federal law enforcement, the future of the justice system remains uncertain. It is up to the American people and the legal community to defend the integrity of the justice system and ensure that it remains independent and free from political interference.

    Tags:

    1. Trump administration
    2. Federal law enforcement
    3. Justice system
    4. Political targeting
    5. Government accountability
    6. Law enforcement reform
    7. Legal system
    8. Impact of Trump policies
    9. Criminal justice issues
    10. Trump administration controversies

    #Trump #targets #federal #law #enforcement #justice #system

  • Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh has very bad news for Donald Trump


    Fearless journalism needs your support now more than ever. Become a Vox Member today.

    On Friday afternoon, a federal judge in Rhode Island temporarily blocked President Donald Trump’s attempt to halt a simply enormous amount of domestic federal spending. Chief Judge John McConnell Jr., who issued the order, is the second federal judge to do so.

    McConnell’s order is significant not only because it puts a second court order between the Trump White House and its proposed spending cuts, but because of who McConnell cites to justify his decision: Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a Republican appointed to the Supreme Court by Trump in his first term. That citation suggests Trump’s effort may be on its way to being declared unconstitutional before the Supreme Court, once this legal challenge reaches the justices.

    Shortly after taking office this month, Trump issued a series of executive orders seeking to reduce or end spending on a variety of issues, from foreign aid, to diversity programs, to what Trump calls “gender ideology extremism.” On Tuesday, the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued a memo purporting to implement these executive orders, which seemed to call for an absolutely sweeping pause on government funding.

    According to the OMB memo, which was rescinded on Wednesday following a bipartisan political backlash, federal agencies were required to pause “all activities related to obligation or disbursement of all Federal financial assistance, and other relevant agency activities that may be implicated by the executive orders.” Though this memo is no longer in effect, the executive orders it sought to enforce still are.

    The theory that the president can simply cut off federal spending that has been appropriated by Congress is known as “impoundment,” and has long been considered unconstitutional by judges and legal scholars across the political spectrum.

    Still, the current Supreme Court has a 6-3 Republican supermajority. And all six of those Republicans ruled over the summer that Trump has broad immunity from prosecution for crimes he commits using the powers of the presidency. So it’s not entirely clear whether these Republican justices will follow the consensus view.

    McConnell’s order, however, quotes from a 2013 opinion by then-federal appellate Judge Kavanaugh, which rejects the idea of impoundment and even cites a 1969 Department of Justice memo written by future Chief Justice William Rehnquist that reads: “It is in our view extremely difficult to formulate a constitutional theory to justify a refusal by the President to comply with a congressional directive to spend.”

    According to Kavanaugh’s opinion, “even the President does not have unilateral authority to refuse to spend” funds appropriated by Congress.

    Meanwhile, another member of the Supreme Court’s Republican majority, Chief Justice John Roberts, expressed similar views when he was a lawyer working in the Reagan White House. In a 1985 memo, Roberts wrote that it is “clear” that the president cannot impound funds in “normal situations.” Roberts added that “no area seems more clearly the province of Congress than the power of the purse.”

    It is, of course, possible that Roberts or Kavanaugh have changed their views on this topic. It is also possible that they will ignore their own beliefs about the law because they want to help out a Republican president. But, assuming that both justices hew to their past views, it suggests that there are at least five votes on the Supreme Court against Trump’s impoundment efforts should this case reach the highest court: Roberts, Kavanaugh, and the three Democratic justices.

    And, with five Supreme Court votes, Trump’s impoundment plans would be declared unconstitutional.



    Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh has very bad news for Donald Trump: In a recent ruling, Kavanaugh joined with the majority to uphold a lower court’s decision that Trump must comply with a subpoena for his financial records. This decision is a major blow to Trump, who has been fighting tooth and nail to keep his financial information private. With Kavanaugh’s vote, it seems that even his own appointees are not willing to bend the rules to protect him. This ruling sets a precedent that no one, not even the President, is above the law. Trump may not be happy about this news, but it is a victory for accountability and transparency in government.

    Tags:

    Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Donald Trump news, Trump latest update, Kavanaugh decision, SCOTUS ruling, Trump administration update

    #Supreme #Court #Justice #Brett #Kavanaugh #bad #news #Donald #Trump

  • Office of Public Affairs | Justice Department Announces Charges Against China-Based Chemical Manufacturing Companies and Arrests of Executives in Fentanyl Manufacturing


    On Friday June 23, 2023 the Justice Department announced the arrest of two individuals and the unsealing of three indictments in the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York charging China-based companies and their employees with crimes related to fentanyl production, distribution, and sales resulting from precursor chemicals. These indictments represent the first prosecutions to charge China-based chemical manufacturing companies and nationals of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) for trafficking fentanyl precursor chemicals into the United States. Specifically, the indictments allege the defendants knowingly manufactured, marketed, sold, and supplied precursor chemicals for fentanyl production in the United States in violation of federal law.



    The Office of Public Affairs at the Justice Department has announced significant charges against China-based chemical manufacturing companies involved in the illicit production of fentanyl. Additionally, arrests have been made of executives involved in the manufacturing and distribution of this deadly synthetic opioid.

    Fentanyl has been a major contributor to the opioid crisis in the United States, causing countless overdose deaths and devastating families and communities. The Justice Department is taking a strong stance against those who are fueling this epidemic by targeting the manufacturers and distributors of this dangerous drug.

    The charges and arrests made in this case are a significant step in combatting the flow of illicit fentanyl into the United States and holding those responsible accountable for their actions. The Justice Department is committed to working with international partners to dismantle the illegal drug trade and protect the public from the devastating effects of fentanyl.

    Stay tuned for further updates on this important case as the Justice Department continues its efforts to combat the opioid crisis and bring those responsible to justice.

    Tags:

    1. Office of Public Affairs
    2. Justice Department
    3. Charges
    4. China-based
    5. Chemical manufacturing companies
    6. Arrests
    7. Executives
    8. Fentanyl manufacturing
    9. Drug trafficking
    10. Criminal charges

    #Office #Public #Affairs #Justice #Department #Announces #Charges #ChinaBased #Chemical #Manufacturing #Companies #Arrests #Executives #Fentanyl #Manufacturing

  • Justice Dept. Is Said to Discuss Dropping Case Against Eric Adams


    Senior Justice Department officials under President Trump have held discussions with federal prosecutors in Manhattan about the possibility of dropping their corruption case against Mayor Eric Adams of New York, according to five people with knowledge of the matter.

    The officials have also spoken to Mr. Adams’s defense team since Mr. Trump took office, the people said. The defense team is led by Alex Spiro, who is also the personal lawyer for Elon Musk, the world’s richest man and one of the president’s closest advisers.

    Mr. Adams was indicted in September on charges including bribery, fraud and soliciting illegal foreign campaign contributions after an investigation that began in 2021. He has pleaded not guilty, maintained his innocence and contended that he is being prosecuted because he criticized the Biden administration.

    In recent weeks, Mr. Adams, a Democrat, has curried favor with Mr. Trump. He met with the president-elect near Mar-a-Lago, attended the inauguration and has said that, from now on, he will share any criticisms of the president in private. Mr. Trump has the power to pardon Mr. Adams, and in December said that the mayor had been treated “pretty unfairly” by prosecutors, and suggested he was considering issuing a pardon.

    The two men, according to several people close to the mayor, have been in direct communication for weeks, speaking on the phone.

    A spokesman for the office of the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, which is prosecuting the case, declined to comment. The office, known for its independence, is being led on an interim basis by Danielle Sassoon, a veteran prosecutor selected by the Trump administration. A spokeswoman for Mr. Spiro did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Mr. Trump’s nominee to be deputy attorney general, Todd Blanche, who was Mr. Trump’s personal lawyer in his criminal cases over the past two years and is a former federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York, was not part of the discussions, a senior Justice Department official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to describe sensitive discussions. Mr. Blanche has not yet gone through the Senate confirmation process.

    Another Justice Department official said all communications between Manhattan prosecutors and Mr. Adams’s legal team about the case had gone through the office of the acting deputy attorney general, Emil Bove, who is also a former Southern District prosecutor and worked with Mr. Blanche on Mr. Trump’s criminal cases.

    It is not unusual for leaders of the Justice Department in Washington to discuss high-profile criminal cases with their counterparts in Manhattan, and there is no indication that the Manhattan prosecutors are inclined to drop the case. But the timing of the discussions, before the confirmation of Mr. Trump’s choices for attorney general and U.S. attorney in Manhattan, Pam Bondi and Jay Clayton, raises questions.

    It is also commonplace for defense lawyers in major cases to ask senior Justice Department officials in Washington to lessen or drop prosecutions. What is notable, however, is that such discussions are happening at a time when there is a skeleton crew of Trump administration officials running the department, which is undergoing major personnel and policy changes.

    Mr. Adams presides over a so-called sanctuary city, one where Trump administration officials this week began a crackdown on undocumented migrants. The Justice Department is among the agencies leading that crackdown.

    In a memo last week, Mr. Bove threatened to prosecute local officials who interfere with the administration’s immigration agenda.

    In December, the mayor’s defense lawyers revealed in court papers that prosecutors had presented additional evidence to a grand jury in his case, suggesting that more charges could be coming against the mayor himself, his associates or both.

    Earlier this month, prosecutors wrote in another filing that they had continued to “uncover additional criminal conduct by Adams” and “identify additional individuals involved,” another indication that new charges might be in the works. The filing provided no additional detail on the conduct they said they had uncovered.

    Under Mr. Trump, federal prosecutors have moved swiftly to halt several ongoing cases, including one against a Texas surgeon accused of obtaining private medical information about gender-transition care for minors and another against Jeffrey Fortenberry, a Republican congressman from Nebraska who was facing a second trial related to campaign finance violations.

    Glenn Thrush contributed reporting.



    The Justice Department is reportedly in discussions about dropping the case against New York City mayoral candidate Eric Adams. This potential decision comes after Adams, a former police captain, was accused of possible campaign finance violations. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story. #EricAdams #JusticeDept #NYCmayor

    Tags:

    1. Justice Department
    2. Eric Adams
    3. Dropping case
    4. Legal news
    5. Criminal investigation
    6. Political figure
    7. NYC politics
    8. Law enforcement
    9. Prosecutorial discretion
    10. Controversial decision

    #Justice #Dept #Discuss #Dropping #Case #Eric #Adams

  • Tom Welling’s Older Superman Gets A Futuristic Justice League 3000 Inspired Costume In Smallville Art


    When a show is as popular as Smallville, there’s bound to be a variety of interesting art from fans. In fact, the long-running superhero series has a dedicated fanbase that regularly produces stunning reimaginations of its characters. Smallville’s story lends itself to this concept, as it follows a young Clark Kent on his journey to become Superman. Because it was conceived as a Clark-centric show and not a Superman one, the series ended when he donned the cape.

    As such, fans often take to social media to share their interpretations of the characters as they appear in the comics. Recently, user @buffy2ville reimagined Tom Welling’s Clark Kent/Superman as a 31st-century hero alongside other Smallville characters, pulling inspiration from the New 52 series, Justice League 3000. In addition to Superman, the artist also redesigned Kyle Gallner’s Bart Allen/Impulse to match the Justice League 3000 version of the Flash, as well as Batman, who never appeared on the television series but did feature in the Smallville Season Eleven comics.

    @buffy2ville frequently shares art of Welling as both Superman and his reporter alter ego, in addition to other characters such as Laura Vandervoort’s Kara Zor-El/Supergirl. These images are often based on alternate versions of Superman across DC media, such as Justice League 3000.

    What Tom Welling’s Justice League 3000 Superman Costume Art Means

    @buffy2ville’s Smallville art showcases the potential of a fully-realized Welling Superman. Though Justice League 3000 is set in the 31st century, making a Smallville project in that setting unlikely, it’s a fun Elseworlds concept. This is doubly true when considering the potential to bring in new versions of fan-favorite characters, such as Bart.

    Related


    Tom Welling’s Recent Comments About Why Smallville’s Clark Kent Didn’t Appear In The Arrowverse Until Crisis On Infinite Earths Makes The Crossover Even More Special

    The Tom Welling Arrowverse crossover was one of the most exciting moments in the entire franchise, but it wasn’t Welling’s first invite to come back.

    Alternatively, with a Smallville continuation in the works by Welling and costar Michael Rosenbaum, the concept could come to fruition. The actors reportedly have a concept for an animated series following up on its 10-season run. Given the choice to make the sequel animated, it is possible for a future Smallville project to explore more high-concept ideas like an episode—or even an entire arc—set in the future. If the series goes in that direction, a design concept like the fan art could make for a great aesthetic for Welling’s Superman.

    Our Take On Tom Welling’s Justice League 3000 Superman Costume Art

    Tom Welling as The Blur in Smallville Season 9 looking offscreen

    Exploring Smallville’s Clark Kent as a more established hero is an exciting prospect, so it makes sense that fans frequently depict him as various versions of Superman. His version of the Man of Steel is something of a blank slate; audiences have a deep understanding of Clark after 10 seasons, but they only saw a short clip of him as Superman in the series finale. Until Welling and Rosenbaum bring Smallville back to the small screen, fan art can fill the void by reimagining its Superman and all of the adventures he could have.

    Upcoming DC Movie Releases





    Fans of the hit TV show Smallville may remember Tom Welling’s portrayal of a young Clark Kent as he navigated his way towards becoming Superman. But what if we got to see an older, more experienced Superman donning a futuristic Justice League 3000 inspired costume?

    In this stunning piece of Smallville fan art, we see Tom Welling’s Superman sporting a sleek, modernized suit that draws inspiration from the Justice League 3000 comic series. With a more streamlined design and high-tech details, this costume gives off a futuristic vibe that is sure to impress fans of the iconic superhero.

    Imagine a storyline where Clark Kent has fully embraced his role as Superman and is now leading a team of superheroes in a high-stakes battle against a powerful villain. With his new Justice League 3000 inspired costume, Superman is ready to take on any challenge that comes his way.

    Whether you’re a fan of Smallville, Superman, or just love seeing your favorite superheroes in new and exciting ways, this fan art is sure to get your imagination running wild. Who knows, maybe one day we’ll get to see Tom Welling don this futuristic costume on the big screen. Until then, we can dream and enjoy amazing fan art like this.

    Tags:

    Tom Welling, Superman, Justice League 3000, Smallville, costume design, futuristic, art, DC Comics, superhero, television, fan art, fan fiction

    #Tom #Wellings #Older #Superman #Futuristic #Justice #League #Inspired #Costume #Smallville #Art

  • Thousands gather in Greece’s cities to call for justice in Tempe disaster


    Thousands gather in Greece’s cities to call for justice in Tempe disaster

    [Giannis Kemmos/ Facebook]

    In one of the largest demonstrations in recent years at Syntagma Square in Athens, tens of thousands of people gathered on Sunday to demand justice for the Tempe train disaster. The protest was joined by 97 cities across Greece and 13 cities internationally, unified under the slogan “I Have No Oxygen.”

    The protests were spurred by the release of a chilling audio recording suggesting that dozens of victims may have died as a result of a fire of unknown origin, rather than the collision itself, during the February 2023 disaster. The government’s handling of the investigation has come under intense scrutiny, with reports of missing evidence and surveillance footage raising serious questions.

    Demonstrators at Syntagma Square continued to arrive well after the official start time of 12 p.m., as announced by the association of victims’ families. By noon, the area in front of the Parliament building on Vasilissis Amalias Avenue was already packed with people.

    The crowd was diverse, reflecting no specific ideological affiliations, and the protest was largely silent, punctuated occasionally by chants of “Murderers! Murderers!” The sheer density of the crowd made movement nearly impossible, and at one point, a woman fainted.

    In a symbolic act, protesters used red paint to write the names of the deceased in front of the Greek Parliament.

    The unexpectedly large turnout caught police unprepared, leading to severe traffic congestion even in areas far from Syntagma Square. Around 2 p.m., clashes broke out between police and a group of unknown individuals, prompting officers to use tear gas to disperse the crowd.

    Maria Karystianou, representing the association of families of Tempe victims, addressed the gathering, expressing gratitude to the attendees. She spoke of a “mafia-style operation to cover up the truth” and presented a detailed timeline of events following the disaster.

    “We want to ensure that no crime goes unpunished,” she said, concluding with, “Thank you all. We will succeed.”

    Dimitris Vervesos, president of the Athens Bar Association, also spoke to the crowd, stating: “We are here searching for oxygen. We are here to leave behind the era of cover-ups.”

    Large crowds were also recorded in Thessaloniki, Crete, Larissa, Nafplio, Patra, and many other Greek cities.

    thousands-gather-in-greeces-cities-to-call-for-justice-in-tempe-disaster0thousands-gather-in-greeces-cities-to-call-for-justice-in-tempe-disaster1

    Opposition parties lent their support to the protests, issuing strong statements against the government and urging citizens to join the demonstrations.

    The leaked audio evidence suggested that approximately 30 of the 57 victims were still alive immediately after the Thessaloniki-bound intercity passenger train collided head-on with a freight train traveling in the opposite direction on the same line.

    Reports indicate that these victims likely died later, possibly from asphyxiation or burns, as the collision triggered a massive explosion and fire. Experts hired by the victims’ families suggest that the freight train may have been carrying flammable materials that were not disclosed in the cargo report, adding further weight to the calls for a thorough investigation.

    thousands-gather-in-greeces-cities-to-call-for-justice-in-tempe-disaster2thousands-gather-in-greeces-cities-to-call-for-justice-in-tempe-disaster3





    Thousands of concerned citizens gathered in cities across Greece to demand justice for the victims of the recent Tempe disaster. The tragic event, which claimed the lives of dozens of people, has sparked outrage and disbelief among the Greek population.

    Protesters took to the streets holding signs and chanting slogans calling for accountability and transparency in the investigation of the disaster. Many are demanding answers as to how such a catastrophic event could have occurred and are calling for those responsible to be held accountable.

    The gathering of thousands of people in cities such as Athens, Thessaloniki, and Patras demonstrates the widespread impact of the Tempe disaster and the deep sense of grief and anger felt by the Greek people. The calls for justice are loud and clear, and the government is facing mounting pressure to take action and ensure that such a tragedy never happens again.

    As the investigation into the Tempe disaster continues, the voices of the protesters will be a powerful reminder of the importance of justice and accountability in the face of such a devastating event. The people of Greece will not rest until those responsible are brought to justice and the victims are honored and remembered.

    Tags:

    Greece, justice, Tempe disaster, protest, rally, tragedy, solidarity, activism, Greek cities, demand for justice, public outcry.

    #Thousands #gather #Greeces #cities #call #justice #Tempe #disaster

  • Huge Athens crowds demand justice for 2023 train crash


    Riot police have clashed with protesters in Athens, after thousands of people gathered to demand justice for victims of Greece’s worst railway disaster, which killed 57 people.

    In 2023, a passenger service carrying 350 people collided with a freight train near the Greek village of Tempi, causing the front carriages to burst into flames.

    “I don’t have oxygen” is the main slogan of the protests – referring to the finding that many were killed not by the collision itself, but by the fire caused by prohibited chemicals on the cargo train.

    The crash prompted widespread condemnation of safety standards on Greece’s railways, as well as the state’s handling of the subsequent investigation.

    Video shows police firing tear gas, as demonstrators threw sticks and others objects towards officers.



    Athens was rocked by massive crowds today as thousands gathered to demand justice for the victims of the 2023 train crash. The tragic incident, which claimed the lives of over 100 people and injured countless others, has left the city in mourning and sparked outrage at the perceived lack of accountability.

    Protesters filled the streets, waving banners and chanting slogans calling for those responsible for the crash to be held accountable. Many held photos of their loved ones who were killed in the disaster, their faces etched with grief and anger.

    The government has come under fire for its handling of the investigation into the crash, with many accusing officials of trying to sweep the incident under the rug. The families of the victims have been left without answers and without closure, fueling the growing sense of frustration and injustice among the community.

    As the crowds swelled and the chants grew louder, it became clear that the people of Athens are united in their demand for justice. They will not rest until those responsible for the train crash are held accountable and the victims are given the justice they deserve.

    The city of Athens stands in solidarity with the families of the victims, and will continue to fight for justice until it is served. The voices of the people will not be silenced, and their demands for accountability will not go unanswered. #JusticeForAthens

    Tags:

    1. Athens protest
    2. Justice for train crash victims
    3. Athens rally
    4. Train crash investigation
    5. Greek protest movement
    6. Demands for accountability
    7. Athens activism
    8. Train accident aftermath
    9. Athens justice movement
    10. Solidarity for victims of 2023 train crash

    #Huge #Athens #crowds #demand #justice #train #crash

  • Trump Justice Department fires officials who investigated Trump and launches ‘special project’ into January 6 cases




    CNN
     — 

    More than a dozen officials who worked on the criminal investigations into Donald Trump have been fired, according to sources familiar with the matter.

    A letter from acting Attorney General James McHenry to the officials said they cannot be “trusted” to “faithfully” implement Trump’s agenda.

    “You played a significant role in prosecuting President Trump. The proper functioning of government critically depends on the trust superior officials place in their subordinates,” McHenry wrote. “Given your significant role in prosecuting the President, I do not believe that the leadership of the Department can trust you to assist in implementing the President’s agenda faithfully.”

    The firings come as the the Trump administration is taking concrete steps to investigate prosecutors who oversaw the criminal cases against January 6 defendants after Trump vowed to seek retribution as a key pledge of his campaign, according to multiple sources who have seen an internal memo on the matter.

    Ed Martin, the interim US attorney in Washington, DC, has launched an investigation into prosecutors who brought obstruction charges under US Code 1512(c) against some rioters that were ultimately tossed because of a Supreme Court decision last summer.

    Referring to the effort as a “special project,” Martin wrote in the memo issued Monday that the attorneys should hand over “all information you have related to the use of 1512 charges, including all files, documents, notes, emails, and other information” to two of the office’s long-term prosecutors who must submit a report on the probe by Friday.

    “Obviously the use was a great failure of our office – s. ct. decision – and we need to get to the bottom of it,” the memo reads, referencing the June Supreme Court ruling that limited the power of federal prosecutors to pursue obstruction charges against the January 6 rioters.

    The demand for documents also extends to prosecutors who have since left the US attorney’s office.

    The move comes as the Justice Department has already seen a dramatic shakeup as officials connected to high-profile investigations have been reassigned, including the now-dismissed case against Trump himself for his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

    Prosecutors who worked on January 6 cases told CNN that the memo raises concerns that Trump’s DOJ is beginning to “investigate the investigators,” as he’s long threatened. One person who worked on Capitol riot cases told CNN that prosecutors don’t know whether this investigation is looking to bring criminal or civil charges, and that some are starting to hire their own lawyers for their defense.

    A senior administration official familiar with the Martin email describes this as a “fact-finding” mission, noting a “huge waste of resources.“

    This letter was sent to various US Department of Justice officials being fired.

    “The prior office screwed up by filing hundreds of cases that ended up getting thrown out by the Supreme Court, it is worth getting to the bottom of poor decision making,” the person said.

    CNN has reached out to the Justice Department for comment.

    Martin, a hardline, socially conservative activist and commentator who was an was an organizer with the “Stop the Steal” movement, was tapped for the role last week. Since starting the job, he has praised Trump for issuing mass pardons for January 6 defendants.

    He also successfully lobbied a judge to toss out travel restrictions imposed on members of the Oath Keepers after they were released from prison, saying: “If a judge decided that Jim Biden, General Mark Milley, or another individual were forbidden to visit America’s capital — even after receiving a last-minute, preemptive pardon from the former President — I believe most Americans would object. The individuals referenced in our motion have had their sentences commuted – period, end of sentence.”

    This story has been updated with additional developments.



    The Trump Justice Department has made a shocking move by firing officials who were involved in investigating former President Donald Trump, as well as launching a ‘special project’ into cases related to the January 6 Capitol insurrection.

    This decision has raised concerns about potential political interference in the justice system, as well as questions about the independence of the Department of Justice under the Trump administration.

    Many critics have pointed out that this move could be seen as an attempt to obstruct justice and protect Trump and his allies from facing accountability for their actions.

    The firing of these officials and the launch of the ‘special project’ into January 6 cases has sparked outrage and calls for transparency and accountability within the Department of Justice.

    It remains to be seen how this controversial decision will impact ongoing investigations and the pursuit of justice in cases related to the Trump administration.

    Tags:

    1. Trump Justice Department
    2. Trump investigation
    3. January 6 investigation
    4. DOJ firings
    5. Special project
    6. Trump administration
    7. Political controversy
    8. Government investigations
    9. Trump administration scandals
    10. Justice Department actions

    #Trump #Justice #Department #fires #officials #investigated #Trump #launches #special #project #January #cases