Zion Tech Group

Tag: Justice

  • Catwoman Has Many Looks But This Viral Cosplay Proves Batman Returns Did the Vixen Justice

    Catwoman Has Many Looks But This Viral Cosplay Proves Batman Returns Did the Vixen Justice


    From jewelry heists to saving the world, DC’s Catwoman has done it all. Selina Kyle has been a staple in the DC Universe for years, thanks to her close ties with Batman and her many solo adventures, and she’s got a wardrobe to match her long tenure. Michelle Pfeiffer’s iconic Batman Returns look remains one of her best, and this flawless cosplay proves it.

    On Instagram, cosplay artist Lisa Mancini (@lisa.mancinerh) shared her brilliant recreation of Michelle Pfeiffer’s Catwoman from Tim Burton’s Batman Returns, a character that has mesmerized generations of fans since she first came slinking on screen in shiny, stitched black latex.

    The cosplay shows off the full, intensive look, including the same sleek latex, prominent white stitching, heels, and cat-eared hood that Pfeiffer made famous; Mancini’s cosplay brings Selina Kyle to life in stunning detail, reminding fans that Batman Returns had one of Catwoman’s best looks to date.

    This Stunning Cosplay Celebrates Catwoman’s “Batman Returns” Costume, One Of Her Greatest

    Cosplay By: @lisa.mancinerh

    Collage of Michelle Pfeiffer as Catwoman Performing Stunts in Batman Returns

    In a franchise like Batman, where so much of the Gotham City “look” relies on darkness and shadow, it isn’t easy to stand out. Catwoman always manages to remain eye-catching, even in suits specifically designed to let her move unseen and leave silently with her prize. Selina often sports dark, skin-tight suits paired with some version of her classic cat ears, whether they’re shaped onto a mask or sitting atop a concealing hood. Most Catwoman designs tend to be a careful balance between functionality and aesthetics, and the Michelle Pfeiffer suit Lisa Mancini perfectly recreated fits perfectly into that wheelhouse.

    In light of the effort required for the original design, Lisa Mancini’s cosplay is even more impressive.

    The original suit, by costume designers Mary Vogt and Bob Ringwood, was made of tight black latex painted with a layer of silicon to give it the perfect fluid shine on set. The white stitching, arguably the most iconic aspect of that Catwoman look, was included at Tim Burton’s request, as he wanted to capture the look of a calico cat coming undone. The costume had to be so precisely fitted that the designers used a cast of Pfeiffer’s body to create it. In light of the effort required for the original design, Lisa Mancini’s cosplay is even more impressive.

    Catwoman Is Among DC’s Most Stylish Heroes, Making Her A Go-To For Ambitious Cosplay Artists

    Michelle Pfeiffer’s Cinematic Selina Kyle Sets The Standard

    Selina Kyle often walks the line between villain and hero. While she frequently aids Batman and his allies in their endeavors around Gotham City, and continues to have a complicated personal relationship with Bruce Wayne, she never fully relinquishes her presence in the criminal underground. An exquisite jewel or expensive painting will always be a worthy target, even if it puts her (briefly) at odds with the Caped Crusader, and she always looks good on the job. Catwoman’s look for Burton’s Batman Returns captured Selina Kyle’s eye for detail, and Lisa Mancini’s magnificent cosplay proved that it’s a timeless look.

    Comic book art: Catwoman extends her hands to the viewer in front of a red background.

    Related


    DC Runs Back Catwoman’s Lore by Revealing Her First REAL Costume

    DC has just turned back the clock on Selina Kyle, unveiling what is now her true first costume. And yes, you’ll definitely say “aw” out loud.

    Source: @lisa.mancinerh on Instagram





    Catwoman, also known as Selina Kyle, is one of the most iconic and complex characters in the Batman universe. Over the years, she has been portrayed in various ways, from sleek and sexy to fierce and independent. But one of the most memorable portrayals of Catwoman was in the 1992 film Batman Returns, where she was played by the talented Michelle Pfeiffer.

    Pfeiffer’s Catwoman was a revelation – a seductive and dangerous femme fatale who was equal parts mysterious and alluring. Her iconic black leather catsuit, whip, and claws made her a force to be reckoned with, and her complex relationship with Batman added an extra layer of intrigue to the character.

    In recent years, Catwoman has been a popular choice for cosplayers looking to channel their inner feline. One cosplayer, in particular, has gone viral for her stunning recreation of Michelle Pfeiffer’s Catwoman from Batman Returns. With her meticulously crafted catsuit, fierce makeup, and confident pose, she embodies the essence of the character with uncanny accuracy.

    This viral cosplay proves that Batman Returns did justice to the character of Catwoman, and Michelle Pfeiffer’s portrayal continues to inspire fans to this day. Catwoman may have many looks, but this cosplay proves that when it comes to capturing the essence of the character, sometimes the classics are truly timeless.

    Tags:

    1. Catwoman cosplay
    2. Batman Returns
    3. Viral cosplay
    4. Catwoman costume
    5. Vixen justice
    6. Michelle Pfeiffer
    7. Selina Kyle
    8. DC Comics
    9. Feline fashion
    10. Iconic characters

    #Catwoman #Viral #Cosplay #Proves #Batman #Returns #Vixen #Justice

  • US Supreme Court’s Thomas will not be referred to Justice Department

    US Supreme Court’s Thomas will not be referred to Justice Department


    By Nate Raymond

    (Reuters) -A judicial policymaking body on Thursday rejected a request by Democratic lawmakers to refer conservative U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to the Department of Justice to examine claims that he failed to disclose gifts and travel provided by a wealthy benefactor.

    The secretary to the U.S. Judicial Conference, the federal judiciary’s top policymaking body, in a pair of letters cited amendments Thomas had made to his annual financial disclosure reports that addressed several issues raised by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and Representative Hank Johnson.

    Trusted news and daily delights, right in your inbox

    See for yourself — The Yodel is the go-to source for daily news, entertainment and feel-good stories.

    The conference also in a separate letter rejected a conservative group’s request to similarly refer liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Justice Department based on omissions in her own disclosure reports.

    Jackson has since amended her reports, the letter noted. The letter was addressed to the Center for Renewing America’s president, Russell Vought, Republican President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to lead the U.S. Office of Management and Budget.

    In a statement, Whitehouse criticized the judicial branch’s response to his request concerning Thomas, saying it was “shirking its statutory duty to hold a Supreme Court justice accountable for ethics violations.”

    The justices and the Center did not respond to requests for comment.

    The Democratic lawmakers had made their request concerning Thomas, a member of the Supreme Court’s 6-3 conservative majority, in an April 2023 letter following reports by ProPublica and others that he had not reported gifts including luxury travel from wealthy Texas businessman Harlan Crow.

    Their letter argued that a referral to the Justice Department was warranted on the grounds that Thomas had willfully failed to comply with the financial disclosure requirements of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978.

    Thomas has said he had been advised he did not have to report that type of “personal hospitality” and promised to do so in the future starting with his 2022 annual report, which was filed in August 2023.

    U.S. District Judge Robert Conrad, who heads the judiciary’s administrative arm and acts as the Judicial Conference’s secretary, wrote that the judiciary had been busy since 2023 updating its financial disclosure requirements and making clear when the personal hospitality exemption does not apply.

    He said Thomas had filed amended financial disclosure reports since the issues first emerged and that he had agreed to follow the relevant guidance issued to other federal judges, including the new policies.

    “We have no reason to believe he has done anything less,” Conrad wrote.

    In declining to make a referral to the Justice Department, Conrad cited “constitutional questions” about whether the Judicial Conference could do so that require further study.

    He also said the lawmakers’ request was mooted when Whitehouse and another senator wrote directly to Attorney General Merrick Garland asking him to appoint a special counsel to investigate the same matters.

    (Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Leslie Adler, David Gregorio, Lincoln Feast and Kate Mayberry)



    US Supreme Court Justice Thomas Refuses to be Referred to Justice Department

    Tags:

    1. US Supreme Court
    2. Clarence Thomas
    3. Justice Department
    4. Supreme Court news
    5. Legal updates
    6. US government
    7. Judicial system
    8. Legal proceedings
    9. Supreme Court decisions
    10. Justice Thomas
    11. US law
    12. Thomas controversy
    13. Legal system
    14. Government news
    15. Thomas investigation

    #Supreme #Courts #Thomas #referred #Justice #Department

  • Federal courts won’t refer Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to attorney general over ethics

    Federal courts won’t refer Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to attorney general over ethics


    WASHINGTON (AP) — The federal courts will not refer allegations that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas may have violated ethics laws to the Justice Department, the judiciary’s policymaking body said Thursday.

    Thomas has agreed to follow updated requirements on reporting trips and gifts, including clearer guidelines on hospitality from friends, the U.S. Judicial Conference wrote to Democratic senators who had called for an investigation into undisclosed acceptance of luxury trips.

    Thomas has previously said he wasn’t required to disclose the many trips he and his wife took that were paid for by wealthy benefactors like Republican megadonor Harlan Crow because they are close personal friends. The court didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday.

    The Supreme Court adopted its first code of ethics in 2023 in the face of sustained criticism, though the new code still lacks a means of enforcement.

    It’s unclear whether the law allows the U.S. Judicial Conference to make a criminal referral regarding a Supreme Court justice, U.S. District Judge Robert Conrad wrote. He serves as secretary for the conference, which sets policy for the federal court system and is led by Chief Justice John Roberts.

    A referral in this case isn’t necessary, Conrad said, because two Democratic senators called on Attorney General Merrick Garland to appoint a special counsel over the summer. No such appointment has been publicly made.

    The group Fix the Court said the financial disclosure law is clear and should apply to justices. “The Conference’s letters further underscore the need for Congress to create a new and transparent mechanism to investigate the justices for ethics violations since the Conference is unwilling to act upon the one method we had presumed existed to do that,” Executive Director Gabe Roth said in a statement.

    Conrad also sent a similar response to a separate complaint from a conservative legal group, the Center for Renewing America, in regard to Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s reports on the source of her husband’s consulting income. Jackson has since amended her disclosures and also agreed to updated reporting requirements, Conrad wrote.





    The Federal courts have decided not to refer Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to the attorney general over ethics concerns. Despite calls for an investigation into Justice Thomas’ potential conflicts of interest and alleged failure to report his wife’s income, the courts have deemed that there is insufficient evidence to warrant further action.

    This decision comes after years of speculation and controversy surrounding Justice Thomas’ judicial conduct. Critics have accused him of potential bias in cases involving his wife’s political activities and financial interests. However, Justice Thomas has denied any wrongdoing and maintains that he has always acted in accordance with ethical standards.

    While some may be disappointed by the courts’ decision not to pursue further action against Justice Thomas, others see it as a validation of his innocence. Regardless of where one stands on the issue, it is clear that the debate over Justice Thomas’ ethics will continue to be a contentious and divisive topic in the legal community.

    Tags:

    1. Federal courts
    2. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas
    3. Ethics investigation
    4. Attorney General referral
    5. Judicial ethics
    6. Supreme Court ethics
    7. Clarence Thomas investigation
    8. Legal ethics
    9. Judicial misconduct
    10. Federal court decision

    #Federal #courts #wont #refer #Supreme #Court #Justice #Clarence #Thomas #attorney #general #ethics

  • US judicial body rejects request to refer Clarence Thomas to justice department | Clarence Thomas

    US judicial body rejects request to refer Clarence Thomas to justice department | Clarence Thomas


    A judicial policymaking body on Thursday rejected a request by Democratic lawmakers to refer the conservative US supreme court Justice Clarence Thomas to the Department of Justice to examine claims that he failed to disclose gifts and travel provided by a wealthy benefactor.

    The secretary to the US judicial conference, the federal judiciary’s top policymaking body, pointed at amendments Thomas had made to his annual financial disclosure reports for the decision.

    In a separate letter, the conference declined to refer liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson to the justice department based on claims by a conservative group that she failed to disclose the source of her husband’s consulting income. Jackson has since amended her disclosures, that letter noted.

    Democratic lawmakers Sheldon Whitehouse, a senator from Rhode Island, and Hank Johnson, a congressman from Georgia, had asked the conference to refer Thomas to the department after reporting from ProPublica in April 2023 revealed that Thomas had not reported being treated to luxury trips by wealthy Texas businessman and Republican donor Harlan Crow.

    Their letter argued that a referral to the justice department was warranted because Thomas had willfully failed to comply with the financial disclosure requirements of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978.

    Thomas had said he had been advised he did not have to report that type of “personal hospitality” and said he would do so going forward starting with his 2022 annual report, which was filed in August 2023.

    Robert Conrad, a US district judge, who heads the judiciary’s administrative arm and acts as the judicial conference’s secretary, wrote that the judiciary had been busy since 2023 updating its financial disclosure requirements and making clear when the personal hospitality exemption does not apply.

    He said Thomas had filed amended financial disclosure reports since the issues first emerged and that he has agreed to follow the relevant guidance issued to other federal judges, including the new policies.

    “We have no reason to believe he has done anything less,” Conrad wrote.

    In declining to make a referral to the justice department, Conrad cited “constitutional questions” about whether the judicial conference could do so that require further study.

    He also said the lawmakers’ request was mooted when Whitehouse, with another senator, wrote directly to the attorney general, Merrick Garland, asking him to appoint a special counsel to investigate the same matters.



    In a recent decision, the US judicial body has rejected a request to refer Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to the Justice Department for investigation. This decision comes after allegations of misconduct and potential conflicts of interest surrounding Justice Thomas have surfaced in recent months.

    The request to refer Justice Thomas to the Justice Department was made by a group of legal scholars and ethics experts who raised concerns about his relationship with conservative activist groups and his wife’s involvement in right-wing causes. They argued that Justice Thomas may have violated ethical standards and should be investigated for potential violations.

    However, the US judicial body dismissed the request, stating that there was insufficient evidence to warrant further action. The decision has sparked outrage among critics who believe that Justice Thomas should be held accountable for any potential wrongdoing.

    Justice Thomas has faced scrutiny in the past for his controversial rulings and close ties to conservative groups. Despite the rejection of the request for investigation, the controversy surrounding Justice Thomas is likely to continue as questions about his impartiality and ethics persist.

    Stay tuned for further developments on this story as it continues to unfold.

    Tags:

    1. US judicial body
    2. Clarence Thomas
    3. Justice Department
    4. Clarence Thomas allegations
    5. US Supreme Court
    6. Clarence Thomas controversy
    7. Judicial ethics
    8. Legal news
    9. SCOTUS
    10. Clarence Thomas investigation

    #judicial #body #rejects #request #refer #Clarence #Thomas #justice #department #Clarence #Thomas

  • Ancillary Justice (Imperial Radch) – Paperback By Leckie, Ann _ GOOD

    Ancillary Justice (Imperial Radch) – Paperback By Leckie, Ann _ GOOD



    Ancillary Justice (Imperial Radch) – Paperback By Leckie, Ann _ GOOD

    Price : 3.98 – 3.69

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    Ancillary Justice (Imperial Radch) – Paperback By Leckie, Ann _ GOOD

    Looking for a captivating science fiction read? Look no further than Ann Leckie’s Ancillary Justice! This Hugo and Nebula Award-winning novel takes readers on a thrilling journey through the vast and complex universe of the Imperial Radch.

    In Ancillary Justice, readers are introduced to Breq, a former ship AI who now inhabits a human body. As she seeks vengeance against the ruler of the Radch empire, readers are taken on a rollercoaster ride of political intrigue, betrayal, and self-discovery.

    Leckie’s world-building is second to none, creating a rich and immersive universe that will keep readers hooked from the very first page. With its compelling characters and thought-provoking themes, Ancillary Justice is a must-read for any fan of science fiction.

    Pick up a copy of Ancillary Justice in paperback today and prepare to be swept away by Ann Leckie’s masterful storytelling. Trust us, you won’t be disappointed!
    #Ancillary #Justice #Imperial #Radch #Paperback #Leckie #Ann #GOOD,ann

  • Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts warns against defying judiciary

    Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts warns against defying judiciary


    Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts issued a warning on Tuesday that the United States must maintain “judicial independence” just weeks away from President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration. 

    Roberts explained his concerns in his annual report on the federal judiciary. 

    “It is not in the nature of judicial work to make everyone happy. Most cases have a winner and a loser. Every Administration suffers defeats in the court system—sometimes in cases with major ramifications for executive or legislative power or other consequential topics,” Robert wrote in the 15-page report. “Nevertheless, for the past several decades, the decisions of the courts, popular or not, have been followed, and the Nation has avoided the standoffs that plagued the 1950s and 1960s.” 

    “Within the past few years, however, elected officials from across the political spectrum have raised the specter of open disregard for federal court rulings,” Roberts said, without naming Trump, President Biden or any specific lawmaker. “These dangerous suggestions, however sporadic, must be soundly rejected. Judicial independence is worth preserving. As my late colleague Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote, an independent judiciary is ‘essential to the rule of law in any land,’ yet it ‘is vulnerable to assault; it can be shattered if the society law exists to serve does not take care to assure its preservation.’”

    “I urge all Americans to appreciate this inheritance from our founding generation and cherish its endurance,” Roberts said. 

    DEMOCRATS LAUNCHED ‘CALCULATED EFFORT’ TO UNDERMINE SCOTUS SINCE DOBBS, CBS REPORTER SAYS

    Roberts also quoted Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, who remarked that the three branches of government “must work in successful cooperation” to “make possible the effective functioning of the department of government which is designed to safeguard with judicial impartiality and independence the interests of liberty.”

    U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor stand on the House floor ahead of the annual State of the Union address by President Biden before a joint session on March 7, 2024. (Shawn Thew-Pool/Getty Images)

    “Our political system and economic strength depend on the rule of law,” Roberts wrote.

    A landmark Supreme Court immunity decision penned by Roberts, along with another high court decision halting efforts to disqualify Trump from the ballot, were championed as major victories on the Republican nominee’s road to winning the election. The immunity decision was criticized by Democrats like Biden, who later called for term limits and an enforceable ethics code following criticism over undisclosed trips and gifts from wealthy benefactors to some justices.

    A handful of Democrats and one Republican lawmaker urged Biden to ignore a decision by a Trump-appointed judge to revoke FDA approval for the abortion drug mifepristone last year. Biden declined to take executive action to bypass the ruling, and the Supreme Court later granted the White House a stay permitting the sale of the medication to continue. 

    The Supreme Court is seen in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 5, 2024. (MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images)

    The high court’s conservative majority also ruled last year that Biden’s massive student loan debt forgiveness efforts constitute an illegal use of executive power. 

    THE BIGGEST SUPREME COURT DECISIONS OF 2024: FROM PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY TO OVERTURNING THE CHEVRON DOCTRINE

    Roberts and Trump clashed in 2018 when the chief justice rebuked the president for denouncing a judge who rejected his migrant asylum policy as an “Obama judge.”

    In 2020, Roberts criticized comments made by Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York while the Supreme Court was considering a high-profile abortion case.

    Roberts introduced his letter Tuesday by recounting a story about King George III stripping colonial judges of lifetime appointments, an order that was “not well received.” Trump is now readying for a second term as president with an ambitious conservative agenda, elements of which are likely to be legally challenged and end up before the court whose conservative majority includes three justices appointed by Trump during his first term.

    In the annual report, the chief justice wrote generally that even if court decisions are unpopular or mark a defeat for a presidential administration, other branches of government must be willing to enforce them to ensure the rule of law. Roberts pointed to the Brown v. Board of Education decision that desegrated schools in 1954 as one that needed federal enforcement in the face of resistance from southern governors.

    Chief Justice John Roberts, left, and Associate Justice Samuel Alito are seated as they and the other Supreme Court members sit for a group photo at the Supreme Court building on Capitol Hill on Friday, Oct. 7, 2022 in Washington, D.C. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

    He also said “attempts to intimidate judges for their rulings in cases are inappropriate and should be vigorously opposed.” 

    While public officials and others have the right to criticize rulings, they should also be aware that their statements can “prompt dangerous reactions by others,” Roberts wrote. 

    Threats targeting federal judges have more than tripled over the last decade, according to U.S. Marshals Service statistics. State court judges in Wisconsin and Maryland were killed at their homes in 2022 and 2023, Roberts wrote.

    “Violence, intimidation, and defiance directed at judges because of their work undermine our Republic, and are wholly unacceptable,” he wrote.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

    Roberts also pointed to disinformation about court rulings as a threat to judges’ independence, saying that social media can magnify distortions and even be exploited by “hostile foreign state actors” to exacerbate divisions.

    The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Danielle Wallace is a breaking news and politics reporter at Fox News Digital. Story tips can be sent to danielle.wallace@fox.com and on X: @danimwallace. 



    In a recent statement, Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts has issued a stern warning against defying the judiciary. He emphasized the importance of respecting the decisions made by the courts, regardless of personal beliefs or political affiliations.

    Chief Justice Roberts highlighted the crucial role of the judiciary in upholding the rule of law and protecting the rights of all individuals. He urged individuals and government officials to abide by court rulings and refrain from undermining the authority of the judicial branch.

    This statement comes at a time when the judiciary is facing increased scrutiny and challenges to its independence. Chief Justice Roberts’ words serve as a reminder of the fundamental principles that underpin a functioning democracy and the need to uphold the separation of powers.

    As the highest-ranking member of the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts’ warning carries significant weight and serves as a timely reminder of the importance of upholding the rule of law. It is a call to all citizens to respect the decisions of the judiciary and uphold the principles of justice and fairness in our society.

    Tags:

    Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts, judiciary, warning, defying, legal system, rule of law, justice system, court proceedings, judicial branch, constitutional rights

    #Supreme #Court #Chief #Justice #Roberts #warns #defying #judiciary

  • PlayStation Plus Monthly Games for Jan 2025: Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League, Need for Speed Hot Pursuit Remastered, The Stanley Parable: Ultra Deluxe – PlayStation.Blog

    PlayStation Plus Monthly Games for Jan 2025: Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League, Need for Speed Hot Pursuit Remastered, The Stanley Parable: Ultra Deluxe – PlayStation.Blog


    Happy New Year! Kick off your 2025 gaming sessions by taking on (and taking out) a league of corrupted super heroes, race on both sides of the law and escape office life with the PlayStation Plus Monthly Games for January. Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League, Need for Speed Hot Pursuit and The Stanley Parable: Ultra Deluxe launch January 7 for PlayStation Plus members*.

    Let’s take a closer look at the games. 

    Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League | PS5 

    Take down The Justice League yourself in single-player or team up with friends in multiplayer co-op in this genre-defying, action-adventure third-person shooter from Rocksteady Studios, creators of the critically acclaimed Batman: Arkham series. Featuring an original narrative set within an expansive open-world city of Metropolis, the game puts the four DC Super-Villains on a collision course with an invading alien force and DC Super Heroes who are now laser-focused on destroying the city they once vowed to protect. All the while, the Suicide Squad must be mindful of the lethal explosives implanted in their heads that could go off at the first sign of defiance. Each squad member has their own unique moveset with enhanced traversal abilities to freely explore the dynamic open-world of Metropolis, along with a variety of weapons to customize, and skills to master. 

    Need for Speed Hot Pursuit Remastered | PS4 

    Feel the thrill of the chase and the rush of escape in Need for Speed Hot Pursuit. Unleash a savage sense of speed both as an outlaw and a cop in the world’s hottest high-performance cars. Outsmart the heat or take down lawbreakers with the tactical weaponry at your disposal in a heart-pumping, socially competitive racing experience. Updated with enhanced visuals, cross-platform multiplayer – including the asynchronous competition powered by Autolog – plus all additional DLC content, this is the ultimate edition of Criterion Games’ critically acclaimed Need for Speed debut. It’s time to reignite the pursuit.

    The Stanley Parable: Ultra Deluxe | PS4, PS5 

    The Stanley Parable: Ultra Deluxe is an expanded re-imagining of the critically acclaimed, award winning indie game The Stanley Parable from 2013. Everything that was in the original Stanley Parable is here, preserved just like it was back in 2013. But The Stanley Parable: Ultra Deluxe also dramatically expands the world of the original game with new content, new choices, and new secrets to uncover. The labyrinth has just gotten bigger. In addition, the game has been visually upgraded to reflect modern technology while faithfully preserving the tone of the original game. Accessibility features have also been added to the game, including localization of in-world text, colorblind options, and content warnings. And just as before, the impeccable voicework of Kevan Brighting will accompany you every step of the way.

    All three games will be available to PlayStation Plus members on January 7 until February 3.

    Last chance to download December’s games

    PlayStation Plus members have until January 6 to add It Takes Two, Aliens: Dark Descent and Temtem to their game libraries.

    *PlayStation Plus Game Catalog lineup may differ in certain regions. Please check the PlayStation Store on launch day for your region’s lineup.



    Hey PlayStation Plus members! Get ready to kick off the new year with some exciting games for January 2025. This month, we have a lineup that is sure to keep you entertained for hours on end.

    First up, we have Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League. In this action-packed game, you’ll take on the role of iconic DC villains as they attempt to take down the Justice League. With stunning graphics and intense gameplay, this is a title you won’t want to miss.

    Next, we have Need for Speed Hot Pursuit Remastered. Get ready to hit the streets in this high-octane racing game. With updated visuals and all the fast-paced action you love, this remastered version is sure to get your adrenaline pumping.

    Lastly, we have The Stanley Parable: Ultra Deluxe. This unique game challenges players to make choices that will determine the outcome of the story. With a mix of humor and thought-provoking storytelling, this is a game that will keep you guessing until the very end.

    Don’t miss out on these exciting titles, available for download starting in January. Stay tuned for more updates and announcements from PlayStation.Blog. Happy gaming!

    Tags:

    1. PlayStation Plus Jan 2025
    2. Suicide Squad Kill the Justice League
    3. Need for Speed Hot Pursuit Remastered
    4. The Stanley Parable Ultra Deluxe
    5. PlayStation Blog
    6. Monthly Games
    7. PS Plus Jan 2025
    8. New PlayStation Games
    9. Gaming News
    10. PlayStation Plus Lineup

    #PlayStation #Monthly #Games #Jan #Suicide #Squad #Kill #Justice #League #Speed #Hot #Pursuit #Remastered #Stanley #Parable #Ultra #Deluxe #PlayStation.Blog

  • Chief Justice John Roberts defends judicial independence, says it is under threat in several ways

    Chief Justice John Roberts defends judicial independence, says it is under threat in several ways


    WASHINGTON (AP) — Chief Justice John Roberts issued a defense Tuesday of judicial independence, which he said is under threat from intimidation, disinformation and the prospect of public officials defying court orders.

    Roberts laid out his concerns in his annual report on the federal judiciary. It was released after a year where the nation’s court system was unusually enmeshed in a closely fought presidential race, with then-Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump assailing the integrity of judges who ruled against him as he faced criminal charges for which he denied wrongdoing.

    Trump won the race following a landmark Supreme Court immunity decision penned by Roberts that, along with another high court decision halting efforts to disqualify him from the ballot, removed obstacles to his election.

    The immunity decision was criticized by Democrats like President Joe Biden, who later called for term limits and an enforceable ethics code following criticism over undisclosed trips and gifts from wealthy benefactors to some justices.

    Roberts, for his part, introduced his letter by recounting a story about King George III stripping colonial judges of lifetime appointments, an order that was “not well received.”

    Trump is now readying for a second term as president with an ambitious conservative agenda, elements of which are likely to be legally challenged and end up before the court whose conservative majority includes three justices appointed by Trump during his first term.

    Roberts and Trump clashed in 2018 when the chief justice rebuked the president for denouncing a judge who rejected his migrant asylum policy as an “Obama judge.”

    In 2020, Roberts criticized comments made by Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer while the Supreme Court was considering a high-profile abortion case.

    Roberts didn’t mention Trump, Biden or any other specific leader in this year’s annual report. Instead, he wrote generally that even if court decisions are unpopular or mark a defeat for a presidential administration, other branches of government must be willing to enforce them to ensure the rule of law.

    He pointed to the Brown v. Board of Education decision that desegrated schools in 1954 as one that needed federal enforcement in the face of resistance from southern governors.

    “It is not in the nature of judicial work to make everyone happy,” he wrote.

    The chief justice also decried elected officials across the political spectrum who have “raised the specter of open disregard for federal court rulings.”

    “Attempts to intimidate judges for their rulings in cases are inappropriate and should be vigorously opposed,” he wrote.

    While public officials and others have the right to criticize rulings, they should also be aware that their statements can “prompt dangerous reactions by others.”

    Threats targeting federal judges have more than tripled over the last decade, according to U.S. Marshals Service statistics. State court judges in Wisconsin and Maryland were killed at their homes in 2022 and 2023, Roberts wrote.

    “Violence, intimidation, and defiance directed at judges because of their work undermine our Republic, and are wholly unacceptable,” he wrote.

    Roberts also pointed to disinformation about court rulings as a threat to judges’ independence, saying that social media can magnify distortions and even be exploited by “hostile foreign state actors” to exacerbate divisions.

    Against a backdrop of those heightened divisions, Americans’ confidence in the country’s judicial system and courts has dropped to a record low of 35%, a Gallup poll found.





    Chief Justice John Roberts defends judicial independence, says it is under threat in several ways

    In a recent speech, Chief Justice John Roberts of the U.S. Supreme Court spoke out in defense of judicial independence, warning that it is under threat in several ways. Roberts emphasized the importance of an independent judiciary in upholding the rule of law and protecting the rights of all citizens.

    Roberts pointed to attacks on judges and the judiciary from politicians, interest groups, and the media as one of the key threats to judicial independence. He expressed concern that these attacks undermine public confidence in the judiciary and erode the separation of powers that is essential to a functioning democracy.

    The Chief Justice also highlighted the dangers of political pressure and interference in the judicial process, noting that judges must be free to make decisions based on the law and the Constitution, rather than political considerations. Roberts called on all Americans to respect the role of the judiciary and to support its independence.

    As the highest-ranking member of the U.S. judiciary, Chief Justice Roberts’ words carry significant weight. His defense of judicial independence serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of a strong and independent judiciary in preserving the principles of democracy and the rule of law.

    Tags:

    1. Chief Justice John Roberts
    2. Judicial independence
    3. Threats to judicial independence
    4. US Supreme Court
    5. Chief Justice Roberts defends independence
    6. Judicial system challenges
    7. Legal system integrity
    8. Judiciary under threat
    9. Protecting judicial independence
    10. Supreme Court rulings.

    #Chief #Justice #John #Roberts #defends #judicial #independence #threat #ways

  • Black Lives Matter: The Fight for Racial Justice and Equality

    Black Lives Matter: The Fight for Racial Justice and Equality


    Black Lives Matter: The Fight for Racial Justice and Equality

    In recent years, the Black Lives Matter movement has gained significant momentum in the fight for racial justice and equality. The movement, which was founded in 2013 by Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opal Tometi, aims to address systemic racism and police brutality against Black individuals in the United States.

    One of the key goals of the Black Lives Matter movement is to raise awareness about the disproportionate levels of violence and discrimination faced by Black people in society. Black individuals are more likely to be stopped, arrested, and incarcerated compared to their white counterparts. They are also more likely to be victims of police brutality and misconduct. The movement seeks to highlight these injustices and demand accountability and change from law enforcement agencies and the government.

    The Black Lives Matter movement has also been instrumental in sparking conversations about the need for racial equity and justice in all aspects of society. From education and healthcare to employment and housing, Black individuals face systemic barriers that prevent them from achieving equal opportunities and success. The movement advocates for policies and initiatives that address these disparities and promote inclusion and diversity.

    Furthermore, the Black Lives Matter movement has been a driving force in mobilizing people to take action against racial injustice. Through protests, demonstrations, and advocacy campaigns, activists and supporters of the movement have called for reforms to dismantle systemic racism and create a more just and equitable society. The movement has also inspired individuals to educate themselves about race and privilege, engage in difficult conversations about racism, and take steps to be anti-racist allies.

    Despite facing backlash and criticism, the Black Lives Matter movement continues to push for change and challenge the status quo. It has brought attention to issues that have long been ignored or overlooked, and it has catalyzed a national conversation about race and justice. The movement has also inspired other social justice movements to address issues of inequality and discrimination in their communities.

    As we continue to navigate the complexities of race relations in the United States, it is important to support and amplify the voices of the Black Lives Matter movement. By standing in solidarity with Black individuals and advocating for racial justice and equality, we can work towards creating a more inclusive and equitable society for all. The fight for racial justice is far from over, but with continued activism and advocacy, we can strive towards a future where all individuals are treated with dignity and respect, regardless of their race or ethnicity.


    #Black #Lives #Matter #Fight #Racial #Justice #Equality,black)

  • Marching for Justice: Examining the Role of Protests in Advocating for Change

    Marching for Justice: Examining the Role of Protests in Advocating for Change


    Protests have long been a powerful tool for advocacy and social change. From the civil rights movement to the women’s suffrage movement, marching for justice has been instrumental in bringing about positive change in society. In recent years, we have seen a resurgence of protests around the world, as people come together to demand justice, equality, and accountability.

    Marching for justice is a way for individuals to amplify their voices and demand action from those in power. It is a way to bring attention to important issues and to hold those responsible for injustice accountable. Protests can also serve as a rallying point for communities to come together and show solidarity in the face of adversity.

    One of the most significant recent examples of the power of protests is the Black Lives Matter movement. Following the murder of George Floyd in May 2020, millions of people took to the streets to demand an end to police brutality and systemic racism. These protests sparked a national conversation about race and inequality, and led to concrete changes in policy and legislation.

    Protests can also serve as a wake-up call for those in power. When large numbers of people take to the streets to demand change, politicians and leaders are forced to listen and respond. In many cases, protests have led to the resignation or removal of corrupt or ineffective leaders, and have prompted governments to enact reforms to address the concerns of their citizens.

    However, protests are not without their challenges. They can sometimes lead to violence and destruction, and can be met with resistance from those in power. It is important for protesters to remain peaceful and non-violent, and to work towards constructive dialogue and solutions. It is also crucial for protesters to have a clear message and set of goals, in order to ensure their efforts are effective and impactful.

    In conclusion, marching for justice is a powerful and necessary tool for advocating for change. It allows individuals to come together and demand accountability, equality, and justice. Protests have the ability to bring attention to important issues, hold those in power accountable, and spark meaningful change. As we continue to march for justice, let us remember the power of collective action and the importance of standing up for what is right.


    #Marching #Justice #Examining #Role #Protests #Advocating #Change,how marchyorktimes

  • Hello, how can I help you today?
Gathering thoughts.. ...
Powered by AI
Chat Icon