Zion Tech Group

Tag: lawsuit

  • Prince Harry settles lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch’s UK tabloids with ‘substantial’ damages


    Prince Harry has settled his lawsuit against News Group Newspapers, the Rupert Murdoch-owned company that publishes The Sun and previously published now-defunct News of The World.

    The settlement, announced Wednesday, includes an apology and admission of wrongdoing from NGN. The media company said it would also pay a “substantial” amount of damages.

    “We acknowledge and apologise for the distress caused to the Duke, and the damage inflicted on relationships, friendships and family, and have agreed to pay him substantial damages,”NGN said in an apology statement. “It is also acknowledged, without any admission of illegality, that NGN’s response to the 2006 arrests and subsequent actions were regrettable.”

    The settlement ends a legal fight that began in 2019 when Harry, the youngest child of King Charles III and the late Princess Diana, sued NGN over alleged illegal information gathering that dated back to the 1990s and 2000s.

    In the lawsuit, Harry alleged that journalists at The Sun gathered information on him illegally, and hired private detectives to do so. He also claimed in the suit that senior executives at The Sun knew about the alleged illegal information gathering and covered it up.

    Harry was joined in the lawsuit by Tom Watson, a U.K. lawmaker.

    Leading up to the trial, NGN had strongly refuted Harry’s claims.

    Harry’s settlement with NGN was announced just one day after the start of the trial in London’s High Court.

    Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, speaks onstage during The New York Times Dealbook Summit 2024 at Jazz at Lincoln Center on Dec. 4, 2024 in New York City.

    Eugene Gologursky/Getty Images, FILE

    On Tuesday, the lawyer for Harry — who lives in California and did not attend the trial’s opening day — asked for an hour’s adjournment, which was followed by additional requests for delays from both Harry’s and NGN’s legal teams.

    In one request for additional time, NGN’s lawyer Anthony Hudson KC said there had been “intense negotiations” between the two legal teams for the past few days.

    “Both parties are in complete agreement… The number of times the parties have been in agreement in this litigation are very few and far between,” Hudson said in his request.

    Harry spoke about the upcoming trial as recently as December, saying he wanted “accountability.”

    “The goal is accountability. It’s really that simple,” Harry told an audience at the New York Times’ DealBook Summit in December.

    Had the trial continued, Harry was expected to testify in-person in February.



    In a recent development, Prince Harry has settled his lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch’s UK tabloids with ‘substantial’ damages. The lawsuit was filed over the alleged hacking of the Prince’s phone and invasion of his privacy.

    The settlement comes after years of legal battles, with Prince Harry accusing the tabloids of breaching his privacy and spreading false information about him and his family. The terms of the settlement were not disclosed, but it is reported that the damages paid to Prince Harry were substantial.

    This victory for Prince Harry is seen as a significant win for him and his ongoing battle against the intrusive and unethical practices of the tabloid press. It sends a strong message that the royal family will not tolerate such behavior and will fight for their right to privacy.

    The settlement also serves as a warning to other media outlets that they will be held accountable for their actions and that they must adhere to ethical standards in their reporting.

    Overall, this settlement is a step in the right direction towards greater accountability and respect for privacy in the media industry. Prince Harry’s fight against tabloid intrusion has been long and arduous, but with this settlement, he has achieved a significant victory.

    Tags:

    1. Prince Harry lawsuit settlement
    2. Rupert Murdoch tabloid damages
    3. UK tabloid lawsuit news
    4. Prince Harry legal battle update
    5. Royal family legal news
    6. Prince Harry vs Rupert Murdoch
    7. UK tabloid scandal
    8. Prince Harry defamation case
    9. News on Prince Harry lawsuit
    10. Rupert Murdoch media controversy

    #Prince #Harry #settles #lawsuit #Rupert #Murdochs #tabloids #substantial #damages

  • Walgreens Stock Plummets as DOJ Files Lawsuit


    Key Takeaways

    • The S&P 500 added 0.9% on Tuesday, Jan. 21, the first day of trading following President Donald Trump’s return to the White House.
    • Oracle stock surged following reports that the software giant would participate in a massive joint venture to build out AI infrastructure in the U.S.
    • Walgreens shares plunged as the Justice Department filed a lawsuit claiming the pharmacy chain had dispensed prescriptions with no legitimate medical basis.

    Major U.S. equities indexes advanced as the markets kicked off a shortened trading week following the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday and President Donald Trump’s inauguration.

    Despite an array of executive orders signed in the opening moments of his new presidency, Trump notably did not enact tariffs he previously indicated he would impose on day one, suggesting the possibility of a less aggressive stance on trade than expected.

    The S&P 500 added 0.9% on Tuesday. The Nasdaq climbed 0.6%, while outperformance in the industrials sector helped lift the Dow 1.2%.

    Shares of nuclear power generators moved higher on the first day of trading in the second Trump administration. Chris Wright, selected by Trump to head the Department of Energy, has stressed that the U.S. will prioritize nuclear power production as it aims to increase energy output. Vistra (VST) shares surged 8.5% Tuesday, posting the S&P 500’s top performance, after authorities lifted evacuation orders related to a fire at a company plant in Monterey County, California. NRG Energy (NRG) shares were up 6.7%.

    Shares of Oracle (ORCL) popped 7.2% higher following reports that the software giant would participate in a $500 billion program aimed at enhancing artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure in the U.S. According to CBS News, Trump is set to announce a massive private-sector investment—a joint venture known as Stargate that will also include Japanese holding company SoftBank (SFTBY) and research organization OpenAI.

    Prologis (PLD), a real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on logistics facilities, reported better-than-expected core funds from operations (FFO) for the fourth quarter, and its shares jumped 7.1%. An increase in demand for warehouse space—boosted by importers stocking up on goods in anticipation of potential tariffs under the new presidential administration—helped drive the strong performance. Prologis also sold a Chicago-area data center facility during the quarter but did not disclose the financial details of the transaction.

    Walgreens Boots Alliance (WBA) shares plunged 9.2%, losing the most of any S&P 500 stock. The U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit claiming the pharmacy giant unlawfully dispensed millions of prescriptions with no legitimate medical basis. According to the suit, the company pressed its pharmacists to fill prescriptions quickly, resulting in the improper dispensation of opioids and other medications. The pharmacy chain said the lawsuit amounted to an “attempt to enforce arbitrary ‘rules’ that do not appear in any law or regulation.”

    Shares of online travel platform operator Booking Holdings (BKNG) sank 4.9%. Tuesday’s downturn reversed gains posted by the stock last week after analysts at Morgan Stanley lifted their price target on Booking stock, citing the potential for the company’s generative AI tool to drive outperformance. However, competition is intense in the travel booking industry, and the company’s dependence on lead generation for bookings remains a concern.

    First Solar (FSLR) shares slipped 4.9%. Although BMO Capital Markets reiterated its “outperform” rating on First Solar stock, analysts pointed to numerous challenges, including issues related to the solar equipment market in India that could also weigh on the company’s sales in Malaysia and Vietnam. Beyond the international concerns, the outlook for renewable energy in the U.S. under the new presidential administration adds a layer of uncertainty.



    Walgreens shareholders were left reeling today as the stock plummeted following news that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a lawsuit against the company. The lawsuit alleges that Walgreens engaged in fraudulent billing practices and overcharged Medicare and Medicaid for prescription drugs.

    The stock dropped by over 10% in early trading, wiping out billions of dollars in market value. Investors are concerned about the potential financial impact of the lawsuit on the company’s bottom line, as well as the potential damage to its reputation.

    The DOJ’s lawsuit is just the latest in a series of legal challenges facing Walgreens, which has been grappling with increased competition and regulatory scrutiny in recent years. The company has vowed to fight the charges and maintain its commitment to providing affordable and accessible healthcare to all customers.

    Analysts are closely monitoring the situation and advising investors to proceed with caution until more information is available. Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    1. Walgreens stock
    2. Walgreens lawsuit
    3. Walgreens DOJ lawsuit
    4. Walgreens stock price
    5. Walgreens legal issues
    6. Walgreens news
    7. Walgreens updates
    8. Walgreens stock market
    9. Walgreens financial news
    10. Walgreens legal troubles

    #Walgreens #Stock #Plummets #DOJ #Files #Lawsuit

  • Walgreens Response to Department of Justice Opioid Lawsuit


    We are asking the court to clarify the responsibilities of pharmacies and pharmacists and to protect against the government’s attempt to enforce arbitrary “rules” that do not appear in any law or regulation and never went through any official rulemaking process. We will not stand by and allow the government to put our pharmacists in a no-win situation, trying to comply with “rules” that simply do not exist.

    Walgreens stands behind our pharmacists, dedicated healthcare professionals who live in the communities they serve, filling legitimate prescriptions for FDA-approved medications written by DEA-licensed prescribers in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. Walgreens has long been a leader in providing education and resources, as well as implementing best-in-class policies and procedures, to help combat opioid misuse and abuse.  

    We look forward to the opportunity to defend the professionalism and integrity of our pharmacists.



    In response to the Department of Justice’s lawsuit against Walgreens for its role in the opioid crisis, the company has released a statement outlining its commitment to addressing the issue and working towards solutions.

    Walgreens acknowledges the seriousness of the opioid epidemic and the devastating impact it has had on communities across the country. The company states that it is dedicated to being part of the solution and has taken numerous steps to combat opioid abuse.

    These measures include implementing programs to educate patients and healthcare providers about the risks of opioids, enhancing monitoring and reporting of suspicious prescriptions, and providing naloxone, a medication that can reverse opioid overdoses, in all of its pharmacies.

    Walgreens also emphasizes its cooperation with law enforcement and regulatory agencies to prevent diversion and misuse of opioids. The company states that it is committed to working with all stakeholders to find ways to address the opioid crisis and ensure the safe and responsible use of these medications.

    While the lawsuit filed by the Department of Justice is a serious matter, Walgreens remains steadfast in its commitment to addressing the opioid crisis and will continue to take proactive steps to combat this public health issue.

    Tags:

    Walgreens, Department of Justice, Opioid Lawsuit, legal action, drugstore, pharmaceuticals, opioid crisis, healthcare industry, corporate responsibility, legal implications, federal lawsuit, prescription drugs, pharmacy chain

    #Walgreens #Response #Department #Justice #Opioid #Lawsuit

  • Lawsuit: Allstate used GasBuddy and other apps to quietly track driving behavior


    With that data—plus, in some cases, data from connected vehicles—Allstate could see when, how far, and for how long someone was driving, along with “hard braking events” and “whether a consumer picked up or opened their phone while traveling at certain speeds,” according to the complaint.

    Texas’ lawsuit claims that Arity incentivized—through “generous bonus incentives”—apps like GasBuddy, a gas price-tracking app, and Life360, which is intended to keep tabs on family members’ location, to “increas[e] the size of their dataset.” Under their agreements with app makers, Arity had “varying levels of control over the privacy disclosures and consent language” shown to app users, according to the complaint.

    Reached for comment by Ars, Allstate Corporation provided a statement: “Arity helps consumers get the most accurate auto insurance price after they consent in a simple and transparent way that fully complies with all laws and regulations.”

    Nine car brands sharing data

    The suit also cites Allstate as gathering direct car use data from Toyota, Lexus, Mazda, Chrysler, Dodge, Fiat, Jeep, Maserati, and Ram vehicles.

    Texas is one of the states that sued General Motors last year for seeking driver data in a less roundabout fashion. GM quietly included “usage-based insurance providers” in its privacy notice for its connected-car service OnStar. A New York Times report revealed that some GM drivers were having car insurance rates adjusted upward or outright denied as a result. GM ultimately stopped sharing driver data with insurers through third-party data brokers, one of which shut down soon after.

    This post was updated to include a comment from Allstate.



    In a shocking new development, a lawsuit has been filed against Allstate claiming that the insurance company used popular apps like GasBuddy to secretly track customers’ driving behavior. According to the lawsuit, Allstate allegedly collected data on users’ speed, acceleration, and even their location without their knowledge or consent.

    The lawsuit, which was filed in a federal court, accuses Allstate of violating privacy laws and engaging in deceptive practices. It claims that the company used this data to adjust customers’ insurance premiums based on their driving habits, without informing them that their behavior was being monitored.

    This news has raised concerns about the level of data collection and surveillance that insurance companies are engaging in, and has sparked a debate about the ethics of using this information to determine insurance rates.

    Allstate has denied these allegations, stating that they are committed to protecting their customers’ privacy and only use data for legitimate business purposes. However, this lawsuit is sure to bring greater scrutiny to the practices of insurance companies and their use of technology to track and monitor customers.

    It remains to be seen how this lawsuit will unfold and what impact it will have on the insurance industry as a whole. In the meantime, customers are advised to be cautious about the information they share with companies and to carefully review their privacy policies before agreeing to any terms and conditions.

    Tags:

    • Lawsuit
    • Allstate
    • GasBuddy
    • Driving behavior
    • Tracking
    • Privacy
    • Lawsuit against Allstate
    • Apps
    • Data collection
    • Driving habits
    • Consumer rights
    • Privacy violation
    • Legal action
    • Technology
    • Surveillance
    • Lawsuit news

    #Lawsuit #Allstate #GasBuddy #apps #quietly #track #driving #behavior

  • Allstate’s Driver Data Collection Sparks Class-Action Lawsuit


    An Allstate customer has filed a class-action lawsuit against the insurance provider, demanding that it pay up for collecting people’s driving-related data through third-party mobile apps. 

    The lawsuit was filed a day after Texas sued Allstate over the same claims, accusing the insurance company of covertly harvesting the information to justify car insurance price increases. 

    Attorneys at Morgan & Morgan and Clifford Law Offices, which filed the complaint, say they “are fighting on behalf of our clients to put a stop to this purportedly improper data collection and hold Allstate accountable for its alleged surveillance and invasion of privacy.”

    The class-action lawsuit was filed in Illinois, where Allstate is based, and is similar to Texas’s complaint. The plaintiff is a Georgia resident and Allstate Insurance client named Demetric Sims. He alleges that Allstate invaded his privacy because the company allegedly collected his driving data through the third-party app, SiriusXM. That’s because the app appears to forward such data to an Allstate subsidiary called Arity, according to an official website about how car insurers can use the company’s software for customer tracking.   

    The website.

    (Credit: Arity)

    “Defendants integrated Arity SDK into widely popular apps, such as: Routely, Life360, GasBuddy, Sirius XM, and Fuel Rewards,” the complaint adds. “Once an app integrated the Arity SDK, the user was unwittingly enabling Defendants to collect the Driving Data via the Arity SDK.”

    However, the class-action lawsuit claims the data collection occurred without explicit consent from users. “Insurers then secretly used that consumer’s data to justify increasing their car insurance premiums, denying them coverage, or dropping them from coverage,” the complaint adds, which is also demanding Allstate end the data-collection practice. 

    If a judge rules in its favor, the class-action lawsuit could lead to compensation for millions of Americans since Arity has collected data on over 45 million consumers. The Texas lawsuit is also urging the court to award restitution.

    Recommended by Our Editors

    Allstate didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. But on Monday, the company pushed back against the Texas attorney general’s lawsuit. “Arity helps consumers get the most accurate auto insurance price after they consent in a simple and transparent way that fully complies with all laws and regulations,” Allstate told PCMag.

    According to Arity’s site, the company gets consent after consumers click on ads about using their data to receive personalized insurance rates. SiriusXM also denied harvesting user information for third-parties. “SiriusXM audio services, including the SiriusXM app, do not collect, share or sell precise geolocation data to any third party. Additionally, the Arity SDK is not integrated into the SiriusXM app,” the company said.

    Like What You’re Reading?

    Sign up for SecurityWatch newsletter for our top privacy and security stories delivered right to your inbox.

    This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links.
    By clicking the button, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our
    Terms of Use and
    Privacy Policy.
    You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time.

    Newsletter Pointer

    About Michael Kan

    Senior Reporter

    Michael Kan

    I’ve been working as a journalist for over 15 years—I got my start as a schools and cities reporter in Kansas City and joined PCMag in 2017.


    Read Michael’s full bio

    Read the latest from Michael Kan





    Recently, Allstate’s driver data collection practices have come under fire as a class-action lawsuit has been filed against the insurance company. The lawsuit alleges that Allstate has been collecting and storing driver data without obtaining proper consent from policyholders, raising concerns about privacy and data security.

    This case highlights the growing importance of data privacy and the need for companies to be transparent about how they collect and use customer information. As more and more companies rely on data to make decisions and offer personalized services, it is crucial that they prioritize the protection of customer data and ensure that they are in compliance with regulations.

    Allstate has yet to comment on the lawsuit, but this case serves as a reminder for companies to review their data collection practices and ensure that they are in line with privacy laws and regulations. Customers should also be aware of how their data is being used and take steps to protect their privacy online. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    Allstate, driver data, data collection, class-action lawsuit, lawsuit, car insurance, privacy concerns, personal data, driver behavior, legal action, insurance company, lawsuit settlement, consumer rights, car safety, personal information, data privacy, legal implications.

    #Allstates #Driver #Data #Collection #Sparks #ClassAction #Lawsuit

  • Allstate faces Texas lawsuit over unauthorized driver tracking




    Allstate, one of the largest insurance companies in the United States, is facing a lawsuit in Texas over allegations of unauthorized driver tracking. The lawsuit, filed by a group of policyholders, claims that Allstate has been using a tracking device in their vehicles without their consent.

    The tracking device, known as Drivewise, is designed to monitor a driver’s behavior on the road, such as speed, braking, and acceleration. Allstate uses this data to determine a driver’s risk level and adjust their insurance rates accordingly.

    However, the lawsuit alleges that Allstate did not inform policyholders that they would be subject to this tracking when they signed up for coverage. The plaintiffs argue that this violates their privacy rights and constitutes a breach of contract.

    Allstate has denied any wrongdoing and stated that participation in Drivewise is voluntary. They also maintain that the program is designed to reward safe drivers with lower insurance rates.

    The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for how insurance companies use technology to assess risk and set rates. It also raises important questions about privacy and consent in the digital age. Stay tuned for updates on this developing legal battle.

    Tags:

    1. Allstate lawsuit Texas
    2. Unauthorized driver tracking
    3. Allstate legal battle
    4. Texas lawsuit news
    5. Allstate insurance controversy
    6. Unauthorized driver surveillance
    7. Allstate lawsuit updates
    8. Texas legal action against Allstate
    9. Allstate privacy violation
    10. Unauthorized driver monitoring scandal

    #Allstate #faces #Texas #lawsuit #unauthorized #driver #tracking

  • Daniel Penny Seeks Dismissal Of Civil Lawsuit Filed By Jordan Neely’s Father


    Daniel Penny, who was acquitted of causing the death of Jordan Neely on a New York City subway, is seeking the dismissal of a civil lawsuit filed by Neely’s father.

    Andre Zachery filed a lawsuit against Penny in December, shortly before a jury found Penny not guilty of criminally negligent homicide, demanding “judgment awarding damages in a sum which exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all lower Courts which would otherwise have jurisdiction.” Penny’s attorneys are seeking to get that lawsuit dismissed, Fox News reported.

    Zachery, who was not a part of Neely’s life, alleged that Penny caused the death of his son and should pay him for it.

    “All injuries or damages sustained by Plaintiff as alleged in the Verified Complaint, if any, were caused in whole or in part by the culpable conduct, negligence, carelessness, and lack of care on the part of Plaintiff, and any recovery against this Defendant must be diminished in proportion to Plaintiff’s relative wrongdoing, fault, misfeasance, malfeasance, failure to exercise due care and/or other culpable conduct,” Penny’s attorneys wrote in response to the lawsuit, Fox reported.

    Penny’s attorneys, Steven Raiser and Thomas Kenniff, also released a statement defending Penny against the charges brought against their client in what they described as the “largest and most resourced” district attorney’s office in America.

    “The result was a full acquittal and a verdict that underscored New Yorkers’ belief in their right to defend themselves and their neighbors from random violence,” the attorneys told Fox News Digital. “We are committed to defending this ill-conceived civil action brought by Jordan Neely’s estranged father with the same vigor with which we defended the criminal case.”

    JOIN THE MOVEMENT IN ’25 WITH 25% OFF DAILYWIRE+ ANNUAL MEMBERSHIPS WITH CODE DW25

    Penny was found not guilty on December 9, after the district attorney’s office dropped its second-degree manslaughter charge against him when the jury failed to return a verdict.

    Jurors were initially tasked with determining whether Penny “recklessly” caused the death of Neely by using the chokehold – or second-degree manslaughter – or if he was guilty of criminally negligent homicide, a lesser charge that carried a maximum sentence of four years in prison. According to court documents, the lesser charge required the jury to determine Penny failed to recognize Neely’s life was at risk as he held him in the chokehold.

    The manslaughter charge was dismissed the Friday before the jury reached its final verdict, and it took them less than an hour to return a not guilty verdict for the lesser charge of criminally negligent homicide.



    In a recent development, Daniel Penny, the defendant in a civil lawsuit filed by Jordan Neely’s father, is seeking the dismissal of the case. The lawsuit, which alleges negligence on the part of Penny resulting in the death of Neely, has been a point of contention since it was filed.

    Penny, through his legal team, has argued that the lawsuit lacks merit and should be dismissed. They claim that there is no evidence to support the allegations made against him and that Neely’s death was a tragic accident that was not the result of any wrongdoing on Penny’s part.

    Neely’s father, on the other hand, is adamant that Penny should be held accountable for his actions and is seeking justice for his son. The case has garnered significant attention and has divided opinions among the public.

    As the legal battle continues, it remains to be seen whether the court will grant Penny’s request for dismissal or if the case will proceed to trial. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    1. Daniel Penny
    2. Civil lawsuit
    3. Jordan Neely
    4. Dismissal
    5. Legal proceedings
    6. Court case
    7. Attorney representation
    8. Lawsuit defense
    9. Litigation strategy
    10. Legal dispute

    #Daniel #Penny #Seeks #Dismissal #Civil #Lawsuit #Filed #Jordan #Neelys #Father

  • Nicki Minaj Sued for Battery by Ex-Manager, Rapper Calls Lawsuit ‘Frivolous’

    Nicki Minaj Sued for Battery by Ex-Manager, Rapper Calls Lawsuit ‘Frivolous’


    nicki minaj getty 1

    6:57 PM PT — Nicki’s lawyer Judd Burstein tells TMZ … “At this time, no complaint has been served upon Mrs. Petty, and therefore, we are unaware of the specific allegations. However, if the lawsuit is as reported by TMZ, it is completely false and frivolous. We are confident that the matter brought by this ex assistant will be resolved swiftly in Mrs. Petty’s favor.”

    Nicki Minaj exploded on her day-to-day manager and hit him in the face so hard she knocked his head back and sent his hat flying … at least according to a new lawsuit.

    The “Starships” rapper is being sued by a man named Brandon Garrett, who claims he was working as Nicki’s manager during her tour earlier this year when she got physical with him.

    In the lawsuit, filed by high-powered trial attorney Thomas Feher and obtained by TMZ, Garrett claims Nicki sent him on an errand after her April 2024 concert in Detroit … and when he got back he was summoned to her dressing room.


    nicki minaj getty 2

    Garrett claims Nicki was inside with other members of her team and she started grilling folks about their job responsibilities. He says she flew into a rage when she learned Garrett had once sent someone else to pick up one of her prescriptions.

    In the suit, Garrett claims Nicki screamed at him, “Are you f***ing crazy having him pick up my prescription? You have lost your f***ing mind and if my husband were here, he would knock out your f***ing teeth. You’re a dead man walking. You just f***ed up your whole life and you will never be anyone, I’ll make sure of it.”

    Garrett claims Nicki kept screaming at him and told him his “life was over” before striking him on the right side of his face with an open hand. He says the force of the blow caused his head to swing backward and his hat flew off his head.

    Nicki’s security team then allegedly swarmed in close to Garrett, and he claims Nicki struck him on his right wrist, knocking documents in his hand onto the floor.

    Garrett claims Nicki then told him to “get the f*** out” and he says he grabbed his hat and quickly exited the room … locking himself inside a restroom at Little Caesars Arena.

    He says his wrist was throbbing and his face was sore as he called his fiancée to let her know what happened … claiming he stayed locked in the restroom for hours out of fear for his safety.

    usher and nicki minaj -

    Garrett claims Nicki’s team didn’t let him on the tour bus back to the tour’s base in Chicago … leaving him stranded in Detroit.

    He’s suing Nicki for assault, battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress … and he’s going after her for damages.

    We reached out to Nicki’s camp … so far no word back.

    Originally Published — 1/3 4:43 PM PT



    Nicki Minaj Sued for Battery by Ex-Manager, Rapper Calls Lawsuit ‘Frivolous’

    Rapper Nicki Minaj is facing a lawsuit from her former manager, who is alleging that she physically assaulted him during their time working together. The ex-manager, whose name has not been disclosed, claims that Minaj became violent towards him on multiple occasions, leading to injuries and emotional distress.

    In response to the lawsuit, Minaj has called the allegations “frivolous” and has denied any wrongdoing. She has stated that she has always conducted herself with professionalism and has never resorted to violence in any situation.

    This is not the first time that Minaj has been involved in legal disputes with former associates. In the past, she has faced lawsuits from former stylists, producers, and collaborators, all of which she has vehemently denied.

    It remains to be seen how this latest lawsuit will play out in court, but one thing is for certain – Nicki Minaj is not one to back down from a fight. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    1. Nicki Minaj
    2. Nicki Minaj lawsuit
    3. Nicki Minaj ex-manager
    4. Nicki Minaj battery lawsuit
    5. Nicki Minaj lawsuit details
    6. Nicki Minaj legal battle
    7. Nicki Minaj lawsuit update
    8. Nicki Minaj lawsuit controversy
    9. Nicki Minaj response to lawsuit
    10. Nicki Minaj frivolous lawsuit

    #Nicki #Minaj #Sued #Battery #ExManager #Rapper #Calls #Lawsuit #Frivolous

  • Blake Lively’s Lawyers Address Justin Baldoni Lawsuit, Details

    Blake Lively’s Lawyers Address Justin Baldoni Lawsuit, Details


    “To address some inaccuracies in the lawsuit, when seeking comments from Mr. Baldoni and others who would be mentioned in the article, The Times shared the information that we intended to publish, including references to specific text messages and documents, asked them to identify any inaccuracies, provide additional context and speak with our team,” the spokesperson continued, adding that they plan to “vigorously defend against the lawsuit.”

    The spokesperson also said, “Mr. Baldoni, Wayfarer* and the other subjects chose not to have any conversations with The Times or address any of the specific text messages or documents and instead emailed a joint response, which was published in full. (Also, they sent their response to The Times at 11:16pm ET Dec 20th, not at 2:16am ET Dec 21st as the complaint says.)”

    *Wayfarer is the production company behind It Ends with Us, founded by Justin. Jamey is the CEO.



    The legal team representing Blake Lively has spoken out in response to the recent lawsuit filed by actor Justin Baldoni. In a statement released today, Lively’s lawyers addressed the allegations made by Baldoni and provided further details on the ongoing legal battle.

    According to the statement, Lively’s lawyers categorically deny all of Baldoni’s claims and assert that the lawsuit is baseless and without merit. The statement goes on to explain that Lively has always conducted herself with the utmost professionalism and integrity in her career, and that she will vigorously defend herself against these false accusations.

    The statement also reveals that Lively’s legal team is currently exploring all options for legal recourse against Baldoni, including potential counterclaims for defamation and malicious prosecution. Additionally, the statement emphasizes that Lively is committed to upholding the highest standards of conduct in the entertainment industry and will not allow her reputation to be tarnished by unfounded allegations.

    In conclusion, Lively’s lawyers express confidence in their client’s innocence and vow to fight for her vindication in court. They urge the public to withhold judgment until all the facts have been presented and the truth has been revealed in a court of law. Stay tuned for further updates on this developing legal dispute.

    Tags:

    Blake Lively, Justin Baldoni lawsuit, legal action, lawyer statement, celebrity news, legal dispute, legal update, court case details, Hollywood legal drama, entertainment news, celebrity lawsuits

    #Blake #Livelys #Lawyers #Address #Justin #Baldoni #Lawsuit #Details

  • Apple offers $95M settlement in Siri privacy lawsuit • The Register

    Apple offers $95M settlement in Siri privacy lawsuit • The Register


    Apple has filed a proposed settlement in California suggesting it will pay $95 million to settle claims that Siri recorded owners’ conversations without consent and allowed contractors to listen in.

    The class-action case, Lopez et al v. Apple Inc, was brought after a whistleblower at Cupertino alleged in 2019 that Siri was listening in on audio conversations without the requisite “Hey Siri” spoken command or manually activating the voice assistant. Court filings [PDF] reference that California requires consent from both parties for recordings.

    “A small portion of Siri requests are analysed to improve Siri and dictation,” Apple said at the time. “User requests are not associated with the user’s Apple ID. Siri responses are analysed in secure facilities and all reviewers are under the obligation to adhere to Apple’s strict confidentiality requirements.”

    In 2018, Tim Cook and his team were marketing Apple as big on privacy, with the slogan “Privacy. That’s iPhone,” although this offer obviously didn’t apply for its Chinese customers. After being questioned about privacy in a letter from Congress, Cook stated unequivocally that Apple doesn’t collect audio recordings of users without consent.

    “Far from requiring a ‘clear, unambiguous trigger’ as Apple claimed in its response to Congress, Siri can be activated by nearly anything, including ‘[t]he sound of a zip’ or an individual raising their arms and speaking,” the complaint reads. “Once activated, Siri records everything within range of the Siri Devices’ microphone and sends it to Apple’s servers.”

    Some plaintiffs also reportedly claim that the data harvested from their conversations was used to target ads, again without consent. One user claims that they received adverts for a specific medication after discussing the topic with their doctor.

    The proposed class action could include anyone who owned a Siri-equipped device and was recorded without their consent since 2011. Given the broad eligibility criteria, the proposed settlement could involve many claimants, potentially diluting individual payouts.

    Apple reported $93.7 billion in net income last year, so $95 million is a rounding error on the books.

    The iBiz had no comment on the current situation at the time of going to press and the settlement does not require Apple to admit any wrongdoing.

    Google is also facing a similar lawsuit after Belgian journalists reportedly found that the Chocolate Factory’s Assistant was also listening in without authorization. That case is still unresolved, and a German investigation into the matter is also ongoing. ®



    In a recent development, tech giant Apple has offered a $95 million settlement in a lawsuit regarding privacy concerns related to its virtual assistant, Siri. The lawsuit alleged that Apple had violated users’ privacy by allowing contractors to listen to and review recordings of Siri interactions without users’ consent.

    The proposed settlement, if approved by the court, would require Apple to pay $95 million to affected users and make changes to its Siri privacy practices. This includes improving transparency and obtaining explicit consent from users before allowing any human review of Siri recordings.

    While Apple has denied any wrongdoing, the settlement demonstrates the company’s commitment to addressing privacy concerns and ensuring the protection of its users’ data. Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    Apple, Siri, privacy lawsuit, settlement, The Register, tech news, data privacy, legal matters, technology industry, lawsuit settlement, privacy protection.

    #Apple #offers #95M #settlement #Siri #privacy #lawsuit #Register

  • Hello, how can I help you today?
Gathering thoughts.. ...
Powered by AI
Chat Icon