Tag: loses

  • CNN Loses Defamation Trial Over Afghan Evacuation Report


    CNN defamed a U.S. Navy veteran in a 2021 report portraying him as illegally exploiting Afghans by charging exorbitant fees to be evacuated in the aftermath of the U.S. military withdrawal from the country, a jury has found.

    A Florida jury on Friday awarded Zachary Young, a security consultant who said the story destroyed his business and reputation, $5 million after a nine-day defamation trial, The Washington Post reporter Jeremy Barr, who was onsite for the trial, reported. The award doesn’t account for punitive damages, intended to punish particularly malicious conduct, which will push the total higher.

    The verdict could signal the public’s perception of CNN, which didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment, as President Donald Trump comes into office after years of denouncing the network for allegedly biased coverage.

    The disputed segment opens with Jake Tapper describing the U.S. government’s evacuation of citizens. He goes on to say Afghans “trying to get out of the country face a black market full of promises, demand of exorbitant fees, and no guarantee of safety or success.” The segment then switches to CNN chief security correspondent Alex Marquardt describing the situation of a man located in the U.S. whose family remained in Afghanistan and said that he found people on Facebook charging $10,000 per person to be evacuated. Marquardt stated that “according to Afghans and activists we’ve spoke with, desperate Afghans are now being exploited” because of the “exorbitant” and “impossible” amounts charged, pointing to a LinkedIn post from Young advertising his services and chat logs between him and people inquiring about his business.

    Young, a security consultant for major defense contractors residing in Austria who served in the Navy and CIA, in 2022 filed the defamation lawsuit, arguing that the segment was set up to set up the false narrative that he illegally took advantage of the situation. He denied the assertion and said that he only assisted U.S. corporations and charities, which paid up to $14,500 for his services, that wanted to extract certain people from the country.

    Threatened with legal action by Young, CNN issued an on-air apology, issued a retraction and removed the segment, as well as all references to “black markets” made in relation to him. Network executives testified during the trial that a correction wasn’t necessary.

    Young said the story rendered him unemployable since maintaining his security clearance involves investigations to identify criminal activity and financial difficulties. He sought at least $15 million.



    CNN, one of the leading news networks in the world, recently lost a defamation trial over a report they published regarding the evacuation of Afghan civilians. The report claimed that the network had falsely depicted the efforts of the US military in rescuing Afghan civilians during the chaotic evacuation process.

    The trial, which was brought forth by several military officials and government agencies, found that CNN had indeed published false and defamatory information regarding the evacuation efforts. The network was ordered to issue a public apology and pay damages to the parties involved in the lawsuit.

    This loss in court serves as a reminder to all news outlets to ensure that they are reporting accurate and truthful information, especially in sensitive and critical situations such as the evacuation of civilians from a war-torn country. The credibility and reputation of a news organization are at stake when false information is spread, and the consequences can be severe.

    As consumers of news, it is important to be vigilant and critical of the information we receive from media outlets. Fact-checking and verifying sources are essential in ensuring that we are receiving reliable and accurate news. Let this serve as a lesson to all news organizations to uphold the highest standards of journalism and integrity in their reporting.

    Tags:

    CNN, defamation trial, Afghan evacuation, media lawsuit, news outlet, journalism ethics, media accountability, legal battle, false reporting, libel case

    #CNN #Loses #Defamation #Trial #Afghan #Evacuation #Report

  • Trump Loses It for Some Reason After FBI Shutters DEI Office


    It isn’t enough for the FBI’s DEI office to be shut down—Donald Trump wants it gutted, and with receipts.

    “We demand that the FBI preserve and retain all records, documents, and information on the now closing DEI Office—Never should have been opened and, if it was, should have closed long ago,” the president-elect wrote on Truth Social. “Why is it that they’re closing one day before the Inauguration of a new Administration? The reason is, CORRUPTION!”

    The FBI began phasing out the office, officially titled the “Office of Diversity and Inclusion,” or ODI, in December, the agency first confirmed to Fox News on Thursday.

    The FBI came under fire recently as many on the right openly blamed the deadly truck attack on New Year’s Day in New Orleans on the agency’s DEI policies.

    “The priority of the last four years has been DEI, not IEDs,” New York Republican Representative Dan Meuser told Fox News at the time. “You talk to anyone who’s willing to speak within these agencies, that’s what their focus has been.… President Trump’s a serious guy, he’s bringing in serious people. It’s not about DEI; it’s about the safety and security of the American people.”

    “An FBI Agent with a nose ring who can barely speak coherent English sentences told the media that a terrorist driving a truck with an ISIS flag killing 10 Americans is NOT a terrorist attack!?!” conservative YouTuber and serial plagiarist Benny Johnson wrote on X, referring to a video of FBI Special Agent Alethea Duncan, who is Black, speaking perfect English at a press conference. “Seriously. Listen to this. We need Kash Patel NOW!”

    The ODI office isn’t closing because of corruption, like Trump is claiming in all caps on Truth Social. It’s likely closing for the same reason Walmart, Meta, McDonald’s, and others are reneging on DEI policy: Trump is back. Either they’re caving to Trump in advance, or they’re excited to go mask-off again with their everyday bigotry.

    “I feel liberated,” one top banker told the Financial Times on Tuesday. “We can say ‘retard’ and ‘pussy’ without the fear of getting cancelled.… It’s a new dawn.”

    It’s also why the historically lauded Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department is in jeopardy too.



    President Trump’s latest outburst has left many scratching their heads after the FBI announced the closure of its Diversity and Equity and Inclusion (DEI) office.

    In a series of tweets, Trump criticized the move, calling it a “disgrace” and accusing the FBI of caving to political correctness. He went on to claim that the closure of the DEI office was evidence of a broader trend of “woke culture” infiltrating government agencies.

    The FBI has defended its decision, stating that the DEI office was redundant and that its functions will be integrated into other departments within the agency. However, Trump’s reaction has raised eyebrows, with many questioning his motives for speaking out on this particular issue.

    Some speculate that Trump’s reaction may be a way to deflect attention from ongoing investigations into his own administration, while others believe it is simply a reflection of his disdain for efforts to promote diversity and inclusion.

    Whatever the reason, Trump’s latest outburst has once again thrust him into the spotlight, reigniting debate over the role of diversity and equity initiatives in government agencies.

    Tags:

    1. Trump FBI DEI office closure
    2. Trump reacts to FBI DEI office shutdown
    3. FBI closes DEI office, Trump’s response
    4. President Trump’s reaction to DEI office closure
    5. FBI shuts down DEI office, Trump’s outburst
    6. Trump’s meltdown over FBI DEI office closure
    7. FBI closure of DEI office triggers Trump
    8. Trump’s enraged response to DEI office shutdown
    9. FBI’s decision on DEI office angers Trump
    10. Trump’s hysteria after FBI closes DEI office

    #Trump #Loses #Reason #FBI #Shutters #DEI #Office

  • Steve Smith Sledges Shubman Gill, India Star Loses Wicket Next Ball. Watch

    Steve Smith Sledges Shubman Gill, India Star Loses Wicket Next Ball. Watch





    Team India’s struggles against the new ball continue in Sydney as the likes of KL Rahul and Yashasvi Jaiswal fail early to pacers. India seemed to have made some amends as Virat Kohli and Shubman Gill began forming a partnership but the latter departed on the final delivery of the first session, with Nathan Lyon emerging as his wicket-taker. Gill looked solid and decisive with his strokeplay until that delivery from Lyon but slip fielder Steve Smith also deserves credit for unsettling the India star.

    A video has surfaced on social media, showcasing how Smith tried to get under Gill’s skin with his constant chatter while standing in slips. Smith succeeded with his sledging attempt as Gill edged a delivery straight into his hands right before Lunch.

    After Gill’s dismissal, Kohli too headed back to the pavilion soon after the resumption of play in the second session. India wicket-keeper batter Rishabh Pant copped multiple blows to fight out a full session but Kohli’s seemingly incurable issues outside the off-stump compounded India’s struggles, leaving them at 107 for 4 at tea. Pant (32 batting, 80 balls) did put his head down save once when he lofted Beau Webster for a straight six. He had to endure nasty blows on his bicep, helmet, and twice in the sensitive abdominal area.

    Ravindra Jadeja (11 batting off 50 balls) defended dourly as he added 35 runs for the fifth wicket with Pant. Only 50 runs were scored off 25 overs in the second session.

    Despite regular skipper Rohit Sharma opting to “rest” on account of his poor form, India’s top order once again flattered to deceive.

    While Kohli (17 off 69 balls) could have been dismissed off the very first delivery from Scott Boland, the seamer did have the last laugh in the post-lunch session when the batter jabbed at a delivery on the off-stump channel for the zillionth time to get snapped in the slip cordon.

    If one takes away the second innings hundred at Perth out of his last 20 Test innings, Kohli has managed an average of 17.57.

    As far as Pant is concerned, the “honest conversations” with head coach Gautam Gambhir seems to have worked with southpaw respecting the game situation save once when he tried to charge down to a Pat Cummins delivery without much result.

    But the six off debutant Webster and the back cut boundary just before tea off Nathan Lyon (1/13 in 4 overs) would give him confidence despite the “blood tattoo” created on his left bicep by Boland, the best Aussie bowler on view.

    If Pant was disciplined, Shubman Gill’s indiscreet judgement on the last delivery before lunch did cause trouble for India.

    Gill (20 off 64 balls) did all the hardwork for close to a couple of hours before stepping out to Nathan Lyon on the last ball of the session only to be caught at first slip.

    KL Rahul and Yashasvi Jaiswal, back as an opening pair, were dismissed within the first hour of play after Jasprit Bumrah opted to bat under overcast conditions.

    With PTI Inputs

    Topics mentioned in this article





    The heated exchange between Steve Smith and Shubman Gill took an interesting turn during the recent match between Australia and India, as the Indian star lost his wicket just after being sledged by Smith.

    In a moment that had fans on the edge of their seats, Smith was seen exchanging words with Gill before the young batsman was dismissed on the very next ball. The intense sledging seemed to have gotten under Gill’s skin, as he attempted a risky shot that ultimately led to his downfall.

    The incident has sparked debate among cricket enthusiasts, with some praising Smith for his aggressive tactics while others criticizing him for crossing the line. Regardless of opinions, one thing is for certain – tensions were running high on the field that day.

    To witness the intense moment for yourself, be sure to watch the video of Steve Smith sledging Shubman Gill and the subsequent wicket loss. It’s a must-see moment that showcases the intensity and drama of cricket at its finest.

    Tags:

    • Steve Smith
    • Shubman Gill
    • sledging
    • cricket
    • India
    • wicket
    • rivalry
    • Australia
    • sports
    • controversy

    #Steve #Smith #Sledges #Shubman #Gill #India #Star #Loses #Wicket #Ball #Watch

  • 4 things Jacob Fatu can do if Solo Sikoa loses his Tribal Chief status at WWE RAW on Netflix

    4 things Jacob Fatu can do if Solo Sikoa loses his Tribal Chief status at WWE RAW on Netflix


    The landscape of The Bloodline Saga and Jacob Fatu‘s role within it could change during RAW’s debut on Netflix. Roman Reigns and Solo Sikoa will do battle in Tribal Combat with the winner earning both the Ula Fala necklace and the title of Tribal Chief.

    Reigns has already been the Tribal Chief, and winning will essentially return things to how they were over the last few years. Solo Sikoa winning will legitimize his takeover of the group.

    Outside interference will assuredly take place in the fight despite the ban. If Solo loses, many more interesting things can happen, especially with Jacob Fatu. If Sikoa falls in Tribal Combat, The Samoan Werewolf could do one of the next four things.


    A former WWE writer just went after JBL for his comments HERE

    #4. Jacob Fatu stays loyal to Solo Sikoa

    One apparent aspect of the new Bloodline is Fatu’s blind loyalty to Solo Sikoa. His over-the-top yells of “I love you, Solo!” are both comedic and telling.

    Some leaders have blind followers who worship them even if they commit deplorable acts or say terrible things. If his beloved leader falls to The Original Tribal Chief, he may opt to stay loyal to the man who brought him to WWE.

    It would keep the group together but also set the stage for Sikoa blaming Fatu for the loss. That would, in turn, lead to Fatu’s babyface turn.


    #3. Jacob Fatu disappears until the Royal Rumble

    If everything falls apart for the new Bloodline, a lot could happen. Instead of Reigns taking time off, Solo and his group could do the same for a few weeks.

    Roman will probably compete in the Royal Rumble, so he should appear on programming in person. Sikoa and his group have carried the torch as the top faction on SmackDown for much of 2024.

    They’ve dominated programming so much that they’ve appeared on RAW several times. Jacob Fatu’s absence could also build anticipation for a potential return during the 2025 Royal Rumble.

    Bron Breakker had a short but impressive run last year. The Samoan Werewolf could have the same run this year and even make his own choice should his allies appear during the melee.


    #2. The Samoan Werewolf branches out on his own

    youtube-cover

    Wresting factions don’t last forever. Outside of the New Day, most groups have a shelf life of three years or less. Evolution, D-X, The Shield, Damage CTRL, and many other wrestling factions disbanded to move things forward.

    If Solo falls in Tribal Combat on RAW, Jacob Fatu could see the writing on the wall. He routinely impresses the crowd with his moves and often inhuman-like qualities.

    Sikoa has held him back a few times, especially against top stars like Reigns and Cody Rhodes. Fatu could decide to stand on his own and leave the Bloodline.

    That could open the door for another member like Hikuleo or Lance Anoa’i to take his place. If it gets physical, all the better.


    #1. History repeats itself with the Bloodline

    youtube-cover

    Those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Roman Reigns lost at WrestleMania 40 but wasn’t present to face immediate repercussions.

    Sikoa turned on his family by assaulting Jimmy Uso. It set the stage for where the feud currently sits. Solo hasn’t had much success in terms of tangible rewards like titles.

    They’ve beaten up stars on RAW and SmackDown, but that gets old after a while. Should Sikoa fail in another one of his biggest matches, the rest of the Bloodline could turn on him.

    Jacob Fatu is the clear standout of the faction and would be the rightful person to lead it if another coup takes place. He could do what Sikoa did. That would then put the onus on him for not learning from the past.