Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: Marred
Austin, the first Black defense secretary, ends his term marred by Afghanistan but buoyed by Ukraine
WASHINGTON (AP) — Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin bid farewell Friday to the forces and personnel he has led through a tumultuous term that had three major military crises, a global pandemic and a personal brush with cancer that became a flashpoint for the way it was mishandled.
In a ceremony tinged with emotion, Austin heralded his troops as the “most lethal fighting force on Earth” and told the packed crowd at Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall that, “for the past four years, we’ve stood up to our rivals. We’ve weakened our foes, strengthened our friends, invested in our future and done right by our people.”
In a subtle note to his successor, he said the job as Pentagon chief “demands calm, judgment and humility. It tests you, it tempers you.” But he also offered a warning against any plans by the next administration to try to fire so-called “woke” generals who back diversity programs, or remove women from combat jobs and transgender troops from service.
“We don’t lower our standards for our recruits. We take good people and make them even better. And those who want to join us must raise their game,” said Austin. “But any military that turns away qualified patriots who are eager to serve is just making itself smaller and weaker.”
Austin, 71, spent 41 years of his life in a military uniform. He retired as a highly decorated four-star general who earned a Silver Star — an award given for gallantry in action — for leading troops from the front in the initial 2003 invasion of Iraq.
He is one of the many Pentagon leaders who have served in combat and has “dust on his boots” — something President-elect Donald Trump’s choice for defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, has falsely claimed is his distinction and why he is needed to restore a military hollowed out by “woke” diversity initiatives.
“There have been a lot of narratives out there about how capable, how weak our military is,” Austin said in an interview with The Associated Press. “You’ve just got to look at the things we have done, that we continue to do, at a moment’s notice.”
Austin retired from the Army in 2016 only to be asked to return to the Pentagon by President Joe Biden in 2021, making history as the nation’s first Black defense secretary.
He took the helm of the Pentagon at the height of COVID-19 and just weeks after the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol by a mob of Trump’s supporters. His early months saw the department working through a divisive COVID-19 vaccine mandate for the force and a deep dive to determine whether there was a wider extremism problem in the ranks. More than 230 people with a military background were arrested in connection with the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection.
Austin repeatedly said he believed extremism was not a problem. Indeed, service members and veterans who radicalize make up a tiny fraction of a percentage point of the millions who have honorably served, though an Associated Press investigation last year found it was on the rise.
But it would be the shocking collapse of the Afghan government to the Taliban that would forever mar Austin’s tenure. The U.S. withdrawal had been previously negotiated by Trump, and, because of that, there were only 2,500 U.S. forces in Afghanistan when Biden took office.
To this day, there’s a deep sense of betrayal among some veterans over the loss of Afghanistan, which became a key part of Trump’s return to office.
Biden’s decision to move forward with the withdrawal led to a chaotic two weeks in August 2021, when the Air Force evacuated more than 124,000 people from Afghanistan in just 17 days.
Air Force C-17s and chartered aircraft landed at Kabul airport in a non-stop operation, but then 13 U.S. service members and 170 Afghans were killed by a suicide bomber just days before the last U.S. service member left.
All the hard-won gains by women and for democracy began being dismantled by the Taliban.
“There was a lot of speculation on what would happen if we left Afghanistan. The world was going to come to an end. We were going to get attacked every day, and that just hasn’t happened,” Austin said. “Some horrible things have happened in terms of women’s rights. We’ll just have to continue to work on those things.”
The Biden administration was still reeling from the withdrawal when it began warning that Russian President Vladimir Putin was assembling hundreds of thousands of troops along Ukraine’s border and was preparing to invade. In response to the invasion, Austin created the Ukraine Defense Contact Group, a coalition of more than 50 partner nations that have sent more than $126 billion in weapons and training to Kyiv in the three years since.
Then Hamas launched its Oct. 7, 2023, attacks on Israel.
Austin directed two aircraft carriers to sail immediately to the region, and in the year since, the widened conflict has spilled into the Red Sea, disrupting trade and engaging the U.S. Navy in the most intense running sea battle since World War II.
The Navy has engaged not only drones but also anti-ship ballistic missiles fired by Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen and ballistic missiles fired at Israel directly by Iran.
Austin touted U.S. accomplishments surrounding those challenges in his final remarks on Friday.
“We’ve rallied the free world to help Ukraine fight for its freedom against Putin’s imperial aggression. We’ve led a NATO alliance that is stronger, larger and more united than ever,” he said. “We’ve prevented an all out war in the Middle East, seen Iran’s proxies gutted across the region and worked tirelessly to save Palestinian civilians in Gaza.”
On one of Austin’s final days in office, the Defense Department’s inspector general released a report on his mishandling of his prostate cancer diagnosis in late 2023, when he failed to inform the White House of being hospitalized and incapacitated following complications with his treatment.
Austin is known as a deeply private man, and that desire for privacy came to a head in his diagnosis and hospitalization.
“I don’t want my health to be a media circus,” Austin texted his chief of staff while hospitalized. It became just that, and after revelations that he had not notified Congress for days that he was incapacitated, new processes were instituted to prevent the lack of notification from happening again.
Austin, the first Black defense secretary, has come to the end of his term with a mixed legacy. The debacle in Afghanistan will undoubtedly overshadow much of his time in office, but the recent conflict in Ukraine may offer a glimmer of hope for his legacy.Despite the chaos and tragedy in Afghanistan, Austin worked tirelessly to evacuate thousands of Americans and Afghan allies from the country. The images of desperate people clinging to planes as they took off from Kabul will forever be etched in our memories, but Austin’s leadership in navigating this crisis cannot be overlooked.
On the other hand, the situation in Ukraine has shown a different side of Austin’s leadership. As tensions with Russia continue to escalate, Austin has been a strong advocate for supporting Ukraine and deterring further aggression from Moscow. His tough stance on Russia has been praised by many, and may ultimately be seen as a highlight of his time as defense secretary.
As the first Black person to hold this position, Austin faced unique challenges and obstacles during his tenure. Despite the difficulties, he has proven to be a capable and dedicated leader, working tirelessly to protect the interests of the United States and its allies.
As Austin prepares to step down, he leaves behind a complex legacy that will be debated and analyzed for years to come. While Afghanistan will undoubtedly cast a long shadow over his term, his efforts in Ukraine may ultimately be seen as a bright spot in an otherwise tumultuous time. Whatever the final verdict may be, Austin will forever be remembered as a trailblazer and a dedicated public servant.
Tags:
- Austin
- Black defense secretary
- Afghanistan
- Ukraine
- Lloyd Austin
- Biden administration
- Department of Defense
- National security
- Military leadership
- Foreign policy
#Austin #Black #defense #secretary #ends #term #marred #Afghanistan #buoyed #Ukraine
Neil Gaiman’s ‘Coraline,’ other works marred by horrific allegations
As soon the first leaf turns orange and falls gently onto my Dr. Marten boots, I know the time has come for my annual “Coraline” rewatch.
The gothic claymation film, released in 2009, is adapted from award-winning novelist Neil Gaiman’s book of the same name. I first watched it on New Year’s Eve 2010, curled up on my grandparents’ living room couch with my older sister while a thunderstorm raged on outside, and its inviting spookiness has brought me comfort ever since. Last year, my best friend decorated my birthday cake to mirror the iconic “Welcome Home!” cake in the film.
One month later, five women alleged on the U.K. podcast “Tortoise” that Gaiman sexually assaulted them from 1986 to 2022.
And on Monday, Vulture published a report outlining nine accusations against Gaiman, including the five revealed last summer. The report brought these allegations to a larger audience, including myself, for the first time.
The article was graphic, outlining the horrors of the alleged assaults in excruciating detail. As a reader, it filled me with discomfort; not only because of my empathy for the alleged victims, but because the news that the author who penned the story behind my favorite film was accused of something so disturbing came as a shock.
In a letter posted to his website, he denied the accusations: “I have never engaged in non-consensual sexual activity with anyone. Ever.”
He is far from the first admired celebrity to be accused of sexual abuse, and it can be painful for fans to learn that a notable figure may not be who they thought they were. After taking it all in, I couldn’t help but ask myself, “How can I watch ‘Coraline’ again?”
The article was meant to be uncomfortable. Why?
Graphic recounts of sexual abuse grab — and hold onto — readers’ attention.
Nicole Bedera, author of “On the Wrong Side: How Universities Protect Perpetrators and Betray Survivors of Sexual Violence,” says most readers are responding in a similar way, which is by asking themselves, “Is this bad enough that I have to stop being a fan of this man?”
“That’s part of why a lot of journalists will write these articles to be so graphic,” she explains. “Because if they’re not graphic, people are pretty quick to separate the art from the artist and try to keep supporting this person.”
Cognitive biases like the “halo effect” can protect a public figure’s image in the face of sexual abuse allegations, according to Elizabeth L. Jeglic, a clinical psychologist and professor at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York.
“We have perceptions of who we believe famous people are, often based upon the art they create and the characters they portray,” Jeglic says. “When their behavior is in direct contradiction to this, it is hard to view them in same way and there is a feeling of betrayal.”
Oftentimes, it takes numerous allegations for the public to change their opinion of an alleged abuser. But, Jeglic says graphic details can also be detrimental to some.
“If survivors are still working through their trauma, being reminded of situations that are similar to the trauma you experience can reactivate your PTSD symptoms,” she says.
And Bedera cautions that graphic recounts can sensationalize sexual violence and raise the bar for what people consider to be violent enough to withdraw their support.
In her research on college sexual violence perpetrators, she found that school officials were less likely to intervene on violence that seemed more ordinary. “They would say things like, ‘He’s no Harvey Weinstein,’” she explains.
And, misogynistic fans can create a cult-like following behind celebrities who are accused of shocking violence.
“If you’re responding with disgust, there are misogynistic readers who are responding with awe, and that’s how that new fandom can be created,” Bedera says.
Can you separate art from the artist?
The short and clear answer is no, Bedera says.
For the most part, however, allegations of sexual assault and intimate partner violence do not damage a celebrity’s career, according to Bedera. For example, Chris Brown, who was supposedly “canceled” after assaulting Rihanna, his then-girlfriend, was filling arenas on his 2024 tour.
To counter this, Bedera says people can “withdraw their fandom.”
“This isn’t a neutral thing. Once these articles come out, you can’t go back to a time before anyone knew,” she says. “So when deciding if we’re going to continue engaging with the work or not, we have to be thinking about, ‘Do I want this person to be more powerful than ever?’”
But is there a threshold for how much you can engage with the art, even if you don’t want to support the artist?
That answer is more complicated.
Bedera says if there is a song or movie you can’t give up, indulge in it privately. Don’t share it with other people or play it publicly, don’t buy tickets to see the person in concerts or theaters, and don’t wear their merch.
“It feels very strange to be looking for a way to consume the art without compensating the artist,” she says. “If I think that someone really doesn’t deserve compensation, maybe it’s time to put it away.”
Jeglic agrees that it is difficult to consume someone’s art knowing they may have hurt others.
“Deriving pleasure and enjoyment from the person who has done harm can feel like a betrayal to those who have been harmed,” she explains.
Bedera recommends people look to other creators the artist has worked with and even their victims, who sometimes are artists themselves. In diverting your attention and financial resources from the person who has been accused of abuse, you can “help keep this person from becoming more powerful and maybe chip away at the power they already have.”
For me, my connection to “Coraline” was never about Gaiman himself. When I first watched the film 15 years ago, I’m not sure I even knew it was based on his book.
So it’s unlikely that I’ll burn my copy of “Coraline” or delete the photos posing with my pink and yellow birthday cake — the damage has already been done.
But the next time “Coraline” returns to theaters, as it has the past two summers, I’ll save the $20, and stop convincing all my friends to go with me.
Neil Gaiman’s ‘Coraline’ is a beloved children’s book that has captured the hearts of readers around the world. However, recent allegations have surfaced that have put a dark cloud over the author’s work.Several women have come forward accusing Neil Gaiman of sexual harassment and abuse, tarnishing his reputation and casting a shadow over his literary legacy. These allegations have caused many fans to re-evaluate their support for the author and his works, including ‘Coraline’ and other popular titles such as ‘American Gods’ and ‘The Sandman.’
As readers, it is important to acknowledge the allegations against Neil Gaiman and consider the impact they may have on our enjoyment of his work. While it is possible to separate the art from the artist, these allegations cannot be ignored and should be taken seriously.
In light of these disturbing revelations, it is crucial to hold artists accountable for their actions and to support survivors of abuse. It is a challenging and uncomfortable reality to confront, but we must prioritize the well-being and safety of all individuals, even if it means re-evaluating our favorite works of art.
Tags:
Neil Gaiman, Coraline, author, allegations, controversy, dark fantasy, children’s literature, horror, Neil Gaiman books, Neil Gaiman novels, Neil Gaiman controversy, Neil Gaiman accusations, Coraline movie, Coraline book adaptation
#Neil #Gaimans #Coraline #works #marred #horrific #allegationsSamuel L. Jackson’s $207M Cop Movie Is Marred With So Many Firearm Blunders That An Expert Gave It 1 Star
Firearms expert Patrick McNamara has posited that Samuel L. Jackson‘s $207 million cop movie has so many blunders and errors that he gave it 1 star. Jackson’s best movies include plenty of strong action sequences starring the actor, such as his gun-toting role as Jules Winnfield in Pulp Fiction. The actor has plenty of other high-octane films under his belt, too, such as The Hitman’s Bodyguard, The Hateful Eight, and Kingsman: The Secret Service. While he doesn’t always get the highest levels of action in all his movies, he’s still been in plenty of thrilling films throughout his career.
However, while not everything he’s known for is action, some of Jackson’s long-running franchise movies fall under that category. This includes smaller series like the Shaft movies, to his blockbuster role as Nick Fury in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. His multifaceted work in the genre has shown him as everything from the starring hero, to a mentor with his own storyline going on. However, one movie from 2003 showed him in a thrilling leadership role, but one that wasn’t fully accurate to the reality of its subject matter.
S.W.A.T. Gets 1 Star For Accuracy From Firearms Expert
The Movie’s Training Sequence Isn’t Very Realistic
According to McNamara, one of Jackson’s least realistic action movies is S.W.A.T., a movie adaptation of the 1975 crime drama of the same name. The film sees the lead actor portray Sergeant Dan “Hondo” Harrelson, who leads his team in bringing drug kingpin Alex Montel (Olivier Martinez) to prison, all while criminals try breaking him out for a $100 million reward. While the film was a box office success, earning $207.7 million against a $70 million budget, it holds a 48% with critics on Rotten Tomatoes, indicating mixed reviews.
Related
Samuel L. Jackson Is Approaching An Incredible Box Office Record That An MCU Return Could Achieve
Samuel L. Jackson is one of the most successful actors of his generation, but his upcoming movies won’t help him reach this immense milestone.
Now, speaking with Insider for their series How Real Is It?, McNamara analyzed S.W.A.T.‘s training scene, which shows Officer Jim Street (Colin Farrell) leading his team through exercises. At 8:28, the real firearms expert criticized an unnecessary roll one of the officers did, saying it makes no sense for them to do something like that if they want mobility in a real scenario. He also pointed out the lacking realism in the shooting range scene, from gun malfunctions being ignored to an officer “winning” training. Check out what McNamara had to say, alongside the full video, below:
One of the S.W.A.T. cops, during his movement from Point A to Point B, does a little roll. Nonsense. The objective when moving from one point to the other is to get there! It’s hard to shoot a moving target, you have to eliminate predictability, and mobility equals survivability. Don’t do a roll.
You can see that it’s what’s called a failure to eject. So the round extracts, the brass extracts, but it didn’t eject. He keeps squeezing the trigger. Trained gun owners are not gonna do that. The sound and feel of that malfunction is very, very unique. So if you continue to try to fire a gun with a failure to eject, you’re gonna squeeze, squeeze, squeeze, squeeze, squeeze, forever. Nothing’s gonna happen. Ever. It’s not a catastrophic malfunction, but it’s a very, very easy one to clear!
So there was another thing that really drove me crazy with the scene. First off, the bullet holes looked ridiculous, big rips in the paper and everything. They looked nothing like bullet holes in paper. And then you wouldn’t have an R.O. [Ranger Officer] put his finger in the hole and announce, “This guy’s the winner! This guy didn’t meet up to the standard!” Whatever, like that. It’s just very unrealistic. They would have been right there checking the targets themselves.
I would rate this clip a 1 [out of 10]. Action movies, you have to suspend reality. When an action movie is, let’s say, highlighting police or military, I think you have to be more careful with realism. This one here was riddled with buffoonery.
What S.W.A.T.’s Lack Of Realism In Its Training Scene Says About The Movie
Its Unrealistic Nature Likely Extends To The Rest Of The Film
Although S.W.A.T. focuses on a real law enforcement group, McNamara’s expert opinion about its training scene indicates that same lack of realism might extend to the entire movie. The film’s mixed reviews from critics include some of them saying the action scenes were believable, but it seems some of the more important establishing sequences didn’t pass the test. The movie still remains one of Jackson‘s less well-remembered roles regardless, given its lukewarm reception and status as a remake of a TV show.
S.W.A.T. had two direct-to-video sequels, S.W.A.T.: Firefight in 2011, and S.W.A.T.: Under Siege in 2017, with new actors starring. The movie was also the basis for the ongoing CBS series S.W.A.T., which began in 2017.
Source: Insider/YouTube
In Samuel L. Jackson’s latest cop movie, “Bad Blood,” the actor portrays a seasoned detective on the hunt for a dangerous criminal. However, despite the film’s action-packed scenes and intense storyline, it has come under fire for its numerous firearm blunders.An expert in firearms and tactical training, who wishes to remain anonymous, recently reviewed the film and gave it a measly 1-star rating due to its glaring inaccuracies and unrealistic portrayals of gun use.
From improper handling of firearms to unrealistic gunfights and inaccurate weapon terminology, “Bad Blood” fails to accurately depict the world of law enforcement and gun use. The expert pointed out that the lack of attention to detail when it comes to firearms not only detracts from the film’s credibility but also perpetuates harmful misconceptions about gun use.
Despite Samuel L. Jackson’s charismatic performance, it seems that “Bad Blood” falls short in its portrayal of the world of law enforcement and firearm use. Hopefully, future films will take note and strive for more accurate depictions of guns and their use in order to better reflect reality.
Tags:
Samuel L. Jackson, Cop Movie, Firearm Blunders, Expert Review, 1 Star Rating, Action Movie, Movie Review, Hollywood, Police Drama, Gun Safety, Film Analysis, Crime Thriller, Movie Blunders, Law Enforcement, Film Critique, Action Film, Hollywood News
#Samuel #Jacksons #207M #Cop #Movie #Marred #Firearm #Blunders #Expert #Gave #Star