CM Punk appeared on Friday’s edition of The Pat McAfee Show, where he discussed a range of topics, including the differences between working under Triple H and Vince McMahon.
Punk highlighted Triple H’s openness to feedback and willingness to consider other people’s ideas—something he believes was less common under McMahon. However, he also acknowledged the importance of having a definitive leader in charge.
“I think he’s receptive to other people’s ideas, whereas maybe Vince wasn’t. He was like, ‘I’m the boss. We’re doing this, and this is how we’re doing it.’ And that’s great. If you run a company, you need somebody who is the yes and no man and [has] the final say.”
Punk continued, emphasizing Triple H’s collaborative approach:
“But I think Triple H thinks he’s surrounded, and oftentimes is, by a lot of really, really genius wrestling minds. If he has an idea or see something one way, he’ll look at Michael Hayes and be like, ‘What do you think?’ He’ll turn and look at Paul Heyman. These are people who have Bonafide resumes. They have literally done everything you possibly could do in the sport. I think their voices should be heard. Not all the time everybody’s going to have this dynamite idea. But I think the best idea always wins in today’s WWE.”
Punk also noted that he prefers not to discuss backstage dynamics publicly, as he believes it can come across as disingenuous.
In a recent interview with PWMania, CM Punk opened up about his thoughts on the leadership styles of Triple H and Vince McMahon. Punk, who has worked closely with both men during his time in WWE, had some interesting insights to share.
When asked about Triple H’s leadership style, Punk described him as a “player’s coach.” He praised Triple H for being approachable and for genuinely caring about the well-being of his talent. Punk also noted that Triple H is more willing to listen to the ideas and feedback of the wrestlers, which creates a more collaborative atmosphere backstage.
On the other hand, Punk had a different perspective on Vince McMahon’s leadership style. He described McMahon as a “dictator” who rules with an iron fist. Punk acknowledged McMahon’s incredible success in building WWE into a global powerhouse but also criticized him for being out of touch with the current wrestling landscape. Punk suggested that McMahon’s stubbornness and unwillingness to change are holding WWE back from reaching its full potential.
Overall, Punk’s comparison of Triple H and Vince McMahon’s leadership styles sheds light on the different approaches to running a wrestling company. While Triple H is seen as more open and collaborative, McMahon is viewed as a powerful but sometimes rigid leader. It will be interesting to see how these contrasting styles continue to shape the future of WWE.
Tags:
CM Punk, Triple H, Vince McMahon, leadership styles, comparison, WWE, wrestling, professional wrestling, CM Punk interview, WWE executives, leadership qualities, wrestling industry leaders, Triple H leadership style, Vince McMahon leadership style
#Punk #Compares #Triple #Vince #McMahons #Leadership #Styles #PWMania
