Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: Nation
TMNT: Mutant Nation (2024) #1 2 3 IDW Publishing COVER SELECT
TMNT: Mutant Nation (2024) #1 2 3 IDW Publishing COVER SELECT
Price : 23.88
Ends on : N/A
View on eBay
Attention all Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles fans! IDW Publishing is proud to present the highly anticipated series TMNT: Mutant Nation (2024)! Get ready for non-stop action and adventure as your favorite heroes in a half shell face off against new and dangerous foes.In this thrilling new series, the Turtles must navigate the treacherous world of Mutant Nation, a land ruled by powerful mutants who will stop at nothing to achieve their sinister goals. As the Turtles fight to protect their home and loved ones, they must also confront their own inner demons and make difficult choices that will shape the future of Mutant Nation.
Featuring stunning artwork and a gripping storyline, TMNT: Mutant Nation promises to be a must-read for fans of the iconic franchise. Don’t miss out on this epic new chapter in the TMNT saga!
Issue #1, #2, and #3 are now available with multiple cover options to choose from. Pick up your copies today and join the Turtles on their most dangerous adventure yet!
#TMNT #Mutant #Nation #IDW #Publishing #COVER #SELECT,ages 3+Transcript: Vice President JD Vance on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Jan. 26, 2025
The following is the full transcript of an interview with Vice President JD Vance on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” that aired on Jan. 26, 2025.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Mr. Vice President, if you’re ready, we’ll dive right in.
VICE PRESIDENT JD VANCE: Ready to go.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So, both defense secretaries from President Trump’s last term were confirmed overwhelmingly, 90 percent of the vote. Pete Hegseth, it was a tie, bipartisan opposition, smallest margin since the job was created. You had to break that tie. If the nominee can’t unite your party, how is he going to lead three million people?
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Well, look, I think Pete is a disrupter, and a lot of people don’t like that disruption, but Margaret that disruption is incredibly necessary. If you think about all of those bipartisan, massive votes, we have to ask ourselves, what did they get us? They got us a country where we fought many wars over the last 40 years, but haven’t won a war about as long as I’ve been alive. They’ve got us a military with a major recruitment crisis, a procurement price crisis that’s totally dysfunctional, where we buy airplanes for billions and billions of dollars, terrible cost overruns, the delivery dates are always delayed. So we need a big change. Now, admittedly, there are people who don’t like that big change, but it is necessary, and it’s explicitly what Donald J. Trump ran on and I think part of the reason why the American people elected him their 47th president.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So, the main objective is changing all of that? That it’s going to be Pete Hegseth alone?
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: I’d say the main problem is- or excuse me, the main thing that we want Pete Hegseth to do is to fix the problems at the Department of Defense and unfortunately, there are many. We’ve gotten into way too many wars that we don’t have a plan for winning. We’ve gotten into way too many misadventures that we shouldn’t have got into in the very first place, and our procurement process, Margaret, is incredibly broken. We’re in an era–
MARGARET BRENNAN: Those are policy decisions.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –Well, of course, they’re policy decisions, but they’re also logistical and implementation decisions. If you look at where we are with the rise of artificial intelligence, with the rise of drone technology and drone warfare, we have to really, top to bottom, change the way that we fund the procurement of weapons, the way that we arm our troops. This is a major period of disruption, and we think Pete Hegseth is the guy to lead the job. Now there’s another element to this Margaret too, which is we believe that military morale, at least until the election of President Trump, was historically low. You had the Army missing recruitment goals by tens of thousands of soldiers, and already recruitment is starting to pick up because Pete Hegseth is fundamentally a war fighter’s leader at the Department of Defense. He is a guy who sees, not through the perspective of the generals or the bureaucrats, he looks at things through the perspective of the men and women that we send off to fight in our wars.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Let me ask you about other nominees. Both the Wall Street Journal and the National Review, conservative publications, as you know, have been critical of Tulsi Gabbard. The Review called her “an atrocious nominee who deserves to be defeated.” They compared her defense of Edward Snowden, the fugitive to- who stole U.S. secrets, to an attorney general who thinks the mob gets a bad rap. Her refusal to accept U.S. intelligence findings that Assad gassed his own people, they said was “like a nominee for OMB Director not being able to count.” Does any of this give you pause putting her in charge of the U.S. intelligence community? Yes or no?
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: No, Margaret look, these are publications that attacked Donald J. Trump obsessively, but those publications don’t determine who the president is, the American people do–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –And ultimately supported him.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –and Donald J. Trump is the person who determines who his cabinet is, not these publications that I think, frankly, have lost relevance. Here’s–
MARGARET BRENNAN: The Senate will–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Here’s Tulsi Gabbard’s–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –ultimately decide.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Well, the Senate will provide advice and consent, as is its constitutional obligation, but I feel confident that Tulsi Gabbard will ultimately get through. Two things that are important to know about Tulsi. First of all, she is a career military servant who’s had a classification at the highest levels for nearly two decades. She has impeccable character, impeccable record of service, and she also is a person who I think is going to bring some trust back to the intelligence services. The bureaucrats at our intelligence services have gotten completely out of control. They’ve been part of the weaponization of our political system, the weaponization of our justice system. We need to have good intelligence services who keep us safe, but part of that is restoring trust in those services, and we think Tulsi is the right person to do it. That’s why the president–
MARGARET BRENNAN: She doesn’t trust those intelligence services.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: She recognizes the bureaucrats have gotten out of control, and we need somebody there who’s going to rein them in and return those services to their core mission of identifying information that’s going to keep us safe.
MARGARET BRENNAN: A lot has happened in the past week.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Yes, it has.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You campaigned on lowering prices for consumers. We’ve seen all of these executive orders. Which one lowers prices?
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Well, first of all, we have done a lot, and there have been a number of executive orders that have caused, already, jobs to start coming back into our country, which is a core part of lowering prices. More capital investment, more job creation in our economy, is one of the things that’s going to drive down prices for all consumers, but also raise wages so that people can afford to buy the things that they need. If you look at our slate of executive orders–
MARGARET BRENNAN: So, grocery prices aren’t going to come down?
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: No, Margaret, prices are going to come down, but it’s going to take a little bit of time, right? The president has been president for all of five days. I think that in those five days, he’s accomplished more than Joe Biden did in four years. It’s been an incredible breakneck pace of activity. We’re going to work with Congress. We’re of course going to have more executive orders, and we’re going to try- the way that you- you lower prices is that you encourage more capital investment into our country, and you asked specifically what executive order is going to help lower prices. All of the stuff that we’ve done on energy, to explore more energy reserves, to develop more energy resources in the United States of America. One of the main drivers of increased prices under the Biden Administration is that we had a massive increase in energy prices. Donald Trump has already taken multiple executive actions that are going to lower energy prices, and I do believe that means consumers are going to see lower prices at the pump and at the grocery store, but it’s going to take a little bit of time. Rome wasn’t built in a day–
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE –and while we’ve done a whole lot, we can’t undo all of the damage of Joe Biden’s presidency in four days–
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, there were a lot of things that contributed to higher energy prices and there was record oil and gas production–
(CROSSTALK)
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –Yes, Joe Biden did many–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –But the price of eggs–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –many terrible things–
MARGARET BRENNAN: — the things that people see–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –to lead to an increase in prices. I agree, Margaret.
(END CROSSTALK)
MARGARET BRENNAN: No, but all the things you experience at the grocery store are what people touch and feel. That’s what- you were talking about bacon on the campaign trail.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Of course, of course.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Those things- when do consumers actually get to touch and feel a difference in their lives?
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Well, but Margaret, how does bacon get to the grocery store? It comes on trucks that are fueled by diesel fuel. If the diesel is way too expensive, the bacon is going to become more expensive. How do we grow the bacon? Our farmers need energy to produce it. So if we lower energy prices, we are going to see lower prices for consumers, and that is what we’re trying to fight for.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, the flurry of executive orders, most of them weren’t about the economy. Many of them–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Many of them were, though, Margaret. We had- I think we’ve taken over–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –You had a promise of tariffs by February 1.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –We’ve taken over 200 executive actions, some executive orders, other executive actions. Again, this is in less than a week, and a lot of them were focused on the economy, bringing investment into our country and lowering energy prices. We’ve also focused on safety, restoring public safety, ending weaponization of the Department of Justice. We’ve done a lot, and I think the president is to be commended for actually coming in and doing something with this incredible mandate the American people gave him. He’s not sitting in the Oval Office doing nothing. He’s doing the American people’s business, and I think they’re going to see a lot of good effects from it.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, a lot of these announcements have yet to take effect.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Sure.
MARGARET BRENNAN: The president did say he wants to do something with an executive order in relation to federal emergency response. He said he may reform or eliminate FEMA instead of sending emergency responders, he may start to send a percentage of money to states to take care of themselves. But you know, FEMA has specialized expertise that some of these states just don’t have–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Oh, Margaret, I–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –and in their arsenal, and–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –I wish that they–
MARGARET BRENNAN: — how will states who are- who are lower income states, the Mississippis, the Kentuckys, the Alabamas, be able to do this for themselves without federal help?
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Well, the president, to be clear, is not saying we’re going to leave anybody behind. He’s saying that in- the way that we administer these resources, some of which is coming from the federal level, some of which is coming from the state level, we’ve got to get the bureaucrats out of the way and get the aid to the people who need it most–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –But these are the first responders–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –Let’s be honest, Margaret. You talk about the expertise from FEMA. FEMA in North Carolina, in California, in Florida with some of the hurricanes, has often been a disaster. And it’s not because we don’t have good people at FEMA. It’s because bureaucratic red tape and garbage prevents the rapid deployment of resources to people who need it the most.
MARGARET BRENNAN: But the states are now going to have to do this themselves?
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: The president is trying to encourage us to reform the way that we deliver emergency response in a way that gets resources to people who need it–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –So don’t take him literally, is what you’re saying?
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: No- we should take the president at his word that FEMA needs desperate reform, because it does. Margaret, when I went to North Carolina as VP-elect, but before we were sworn in, people would talk about how FEMA would get resources, food, medicine, water, to a warehouse, but then would have no plan to get it from the warehouse to the people in the mountains who were literally starving and thirsting to death. We can do so much better, and under Donald Trump’s leadership, we will.
MARGARET BRENNAN: But they work with the state and local officials.
(CROSSTALK)
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: They often don’t work well enough–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –So now–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –And again, that’s not because–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –that’s going to be on the state and local officials?–
(END CROSSTALK)
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –They- no- the FEMA management officials, don’t work well enough with state and local officials to get resources to the people who need it. We should expect- and this is, I think, one of the fundamental premises of President Trump’s leadership. The American people should expect more of their government. When there’s a terrible disaster, they should expect food, medicine and water to get to the people who need it. When there’s a terrible fire in California, the fire hydrants ought to actually turn on. I am sick of the American people having such low expectations for their government. They should demand more of us, because it’s the greatest country in the world, and that’s what Donald Trump’s leadership promises to bring back.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So still count on the federal government, but watch that space. Let me ask you about another area that you campaigned on quite a lot, and there was a flurry of activity on. And that has to do with immigration.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Sure.
MARGARET BRENNAN: The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops this week condemned some of the executive orders signed by President Trump, specifically those allowing Immigration and Customs Enforcement to enter churches and to enter schools. Do you personally support the idea of conducting a raid or enforcement action in a church service, at a school?
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Well, let me, let me address this. Of course, if you have a person who is convicted of a violent crime, whether they’re an illegal immigrant or a non-illegal immigrant, you have to go and get that person to protect the public safety. That’s not unique to immigration. But let me just address the- this particular issue, Margaret. Because as a practicing Catholic, I was actually heartbroken by that statement. And I think that the US Conference of Catholic Bishops needs to actually look in the mirror a little bit and recognize that when they receive over $100 million to help resettle illegal immigrants, are they worried about humanitarian concerns? Or are they actually worried about their bottom line? We’re going to enforce immigration law. We’re going to protect the American people.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Donald Trump promised to do that. And I believe the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, if they’re worried about the humanitarian costs of immigration enforcement, let them talk about the children who have been sex trafficked because of the wide open border of Joe Biden–
(CROSSTALK)
MARGARET BRENNAN: –So you- you personally support–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Let them talk about–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –them going into–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –people like Laken Riley–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –schools and churches?
(END CROSSTALK)
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –who are brutally murdered. I support us doing law enforcement against violent criminals, whether they’re illegal immigrants or anybody else, in a way that keeps us safe. Let me ask this question, Margaret–
MARGARET BRENNAN: But, but the–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –let’s separate the immigration issue. If you had a violent murderer in a school, of course I want law enforcement–
MARGARET BRENNAN: Of course.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –to go and get that person out.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Of course.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: So then what’s the point of the question?
MARGARET BRENNAN: You changed the regulation this week, that’s the point of the question.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Exactly, to–
MARGARET BRENNAN: Giving the authority to go into churches–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –Yes, exactly–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –and go into schools–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: We empowered law enforcement to enforce the law everywhere, to protect Americans–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –But that also has a knock on effect- a chilling effect, arguably, to people to not send their kids to school.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: I- I desperately hope it has a chilling effect–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –In the churches–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –on illegal immigrants coming into our country.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You think the US Conference of Catholics Bishops is- are actively hiding criminals from law enforcement?
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: I think the US Conference of Catholic Bishops has, frankly, not been a good partner in common sense immigration enforcement that the American people voted for, and I hope, again, as a devout Catholic, that they’ll do better.
MARGARET BRENNAN: There are five legal challenges already to one of the other immigration actions, the order on birthright citizenship. A federal judge, appointed by Ronald Reagan, who I think you’d agree, has some conservative credentials–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –Sure–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –paused the order to end birthright citizenship, calling it “blatantly unconstitutional.” How do you reconcile this challenge to the 14th Amendment to the Constitution?
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: So, I obviously disagree with that judge and these things- some of them will be litigated. That’s the nature of our constitutional system. But here’s the basic idea of President Trump’s view on this. If you are a lawful permanent resident or a legal immigrant who plans to stay, your children, of course, should become American citizens. But let’s say you’re the child of an ambassador, you don’t become–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –but that’s not part of it.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Well, that’s an important principle–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –there’s already a carveout having to do with kids of diplomats.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: But we’re saying that that carve out should apply to anybody who doesn’t plan to stay here. If you come here on vacation and you have a baby in an American hospital, that baby doesn’t become an American citizen. If you’re an illegal alien and you come here temporarily, hopefully, your child does not become an ille- American citizen by virtue of just having been born on American soil. It’s a very basic principle in American immigration law, that if you want to become an American citizen, and you’ve done it the right way, and the American people in their collective wisdom have welcomed you into our national community, then you become a citizen. But temporary residents, people who come in here, whether legally or illegally, and don’t plan to stay, their children shouldn’t become American citizens. I don’t know any country that does that, or why we would be different.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, this is a country founded by immigrants.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Well, this is a country founded by–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –This is a unique country.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: This is a very unique country, and it was founded by some immigrants and some settlers. But just because we were founded by immigrants, doesn’t mean that 240 years later that we have to have the dumbest immigration policy in the world. No country says that temporary visitors- their children will be given complete access to the benefits and blessings of American citizenship. America should actually look out for the interests of our citizens first, and that means, again, if you’re here permanently and lawfully, your kid becomes an American citizen. If you’re not here permanently, if you’re not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States–
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –and don’t plan to be, why would we make those people’s children American citizens permanently?
MARGARET BRENNAN: I want to ask you about refugee admissions, which were just suspended by the president. That has nothing to do with the U.S. border. Refugee screening takes 18 to 24 months to go through. They are heavily vetted. Left literally at the airport this week were thousands of Afghans who- some of whom had worked with the United States government and were promised to come here. When you talked to us in August, you said, “I don’t think we should abandon anybody who’s been properly vetted and helped us.” Do you stand by that?
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Well, Margaret, I don’t agree that all these immigrants, or all these refugees, have been properly vetted. In fact, we know that there are cases of people who allegedly were properly vetted and then were literally planning terrorist attacks in our country. That happened during the campaign if you may remember. So clearly, not all of these foreign nationals have been properly vetted–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –no, but there are 30,000 people in the pipeline- Afghan refugees. Do you stand by it–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –but my primary concern as the vice president, Margaret, is to look after the American people–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –So, no.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: And now that we know that we have vetting problems with a lot of these refugee programs, we absolutely cannot unleash thousands of unvetted people into our country. It’s not good–
MARGARET BRENNAN: These people are vetted. These people are vetted–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –Just like the guy who planned a terrorist attack in Oklahoma a few months ago? He was allegedly properly vetted, and many people in the media and the Democratic Party said that he was properly vetted. Clearly he wasn’t.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah. The–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: I don’t want my children to share a neighborhood with people who are not properly vetted, and because I don’t want it for my kids, I’m not going to force any other American citizens kids to do that either.
MARGARET BRENNAN: No. And that was a very particular case. It wasn’t clear if he was radicalized when he got here or while he was living here, but–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: I don’t really care, Margaret. I don’t want that person in my country, and I think most Americans agree with me.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Anyway. I need to move on to something, because I know we’re running out of time here. Two weeks ago, you were on Fox News, and you said, “if you protested peacefully on January 6 and had Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice treat you like a gang member, you should be pardoned. If you committed violence on that day, obviously you shouldn’t be pardoned.” Did you counsel the president against these blanket pardons for 1,500 people–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Well, Margaret, I noticed that–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –including those who committed violence?
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Margaret, I noticed that you cut off the thing that I said immediately after that. The full quote is that, of course, there are gray areas. And here’s the nature of the gray area. Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice denied constitutional protections in the prosecutions. There were double standards in how sentences were applied to the J6 protesters versus other groups. What the president said consistently on the campaign–
MARGARET BRENNAN: Case by case basis.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –is that he was going to look at a case by case basis–
MARGARET BRENNAN: This is blanket.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –and that’s exactly what we did. We looked at 1,600 cases. And the thing that came out of it, Margaret, is that there was a massive denial of due process of liberty, and a lot of people were denied their constitutional rights. The president believes that. I believe that, and I think he made the right decision.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Daniel Rodriguez used an electro sho- shock weapon against a policeman who was dragged out of the defensive line by plunging it into the officer’s neck. He was in prison, sentenced to 12 years, 7 months. He got a pardon. Ronald McAbee hit a cop while wearing reinforced brass knuckle gloves, and he held one down on the ground as other rioters assailed the officer for over 20 seconds, causing a concussion. If you stand with law enforcement, how can you call these people unjustly imprisoned?
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Margaret, you’re separating- there’s an important issue here. There’s what the people actually did on January the 6th, and we’re not saying that everybody did everything perfectly. And then what did Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice do in unjustly prosecuting well over a thousand Americans in a way that was politically motivated–
MARGARET BRENNAN: Is violence like that against a police officer ever justified?
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Violence against a police officer is not justified. But that doesn’t mean that you should have Merrick Garland’s weaponized Department of Justice expose you to incredibly unfair process, to denial of constitutional rights, and frankly, to a double standard that was not applied to many people, including, of course, the Black Lives Ma- Matter rioters who killed over two dozen people and never had the weight of a weaponized Department of Justice come against them. The pardon power is not just for people who are angels or people who are perfect. And of course, we love our law enforcement and want people to be peaceful, with everybody, but especially with our good cops. That’s a separate issue from what Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice did. We rectified a wrong, and I stand by it.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I’m being told we’re out of time, but I want to quickly ask you–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Sure, please.
MARGARET BRENNAN: –the richest men in the world were at that Capitol on Inauguration Day. Heads of Amazon, Google, Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook. In August you told us Google and Facebook are too big, “we ought to take the Teddy Roosevelt approach. Break ’em up. Don’t let them control what people are allowed to say.” They’ve now donated to the Trump inauguration. Are you still going to break up big tech?
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: So, you know who else was at the inauguration was my mom, and a lot of people who just supported the president and fought every single day to get- get his election. And to make it–
(CROSSTALK)
MARGARET BRENNAN: They did $1 million each–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –and to make it- and to make it possible–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –to the inauguration.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –and there were a lot of people who didn’t give a million dollars to the inauguration who were on that–
MARGARET BRENNAN: They got pretty good seating.
(END CROSSTALK)
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –who were on that stage, Margaret. They didn’t have as good of seating as my mom and a lot of other people who were there to support us. But look, we believe fundamentally that big tech does have too much power, and there are two ways they can go about this. They can either respect America’s- Americans’ constitutional rights, they can stop engaging in censorship, and if they don’t, you can be absolutely sure that Donald Trump’s leadership is not going to look too kindly on them.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So they’re still on notice.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: They’re very much on notice.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Vice President JD Vance, thank you–
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Thank you, Margaret.
MARGARET BRENNAN: –for speaking to us after your first week on the job.
VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Good to see you.
Transcript: Vice President JD Vance on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Jan. 26, 2025On Sunday, Vice President JD Vance joined Margaret Brennan on “Face the Nation” to discuss the latest developments in the administration’s agenda and address pressing issues facing the country. Here is a transcript of their conversation:
Margaret Brennan: Good morning, Vice President Vance. Thank you for joining us today.
Vice President Vance: Good morning, Margaret. It’s a pleasure to be here.
Margaret Brennan: Let’s start with the ongoing situation in Eastern Europe. How is the administration responding to the escalating tensions in the region?
Vice President Vance: The administration is closely monitoring the situation in Eastern Europe and working alongside our allies to ensure stability and security in the region. We are committed to upholding our commitments to NATO and standing up to any threats to global peace and security.
Margaret Brennan: Turning to domestic issues, the economy has been a major focus for the administration. What steps are being taken to address inflation and ensure economic growth?
Vice President Vance: The administration is taking a multi-faceted approach to addressing inflation and boosting economic growth. We are investing in infrastructure, supporting small businesses, and implementing targeted policies to address the root causes of inflation. Our goal is to create a strong and resilient economy that benefits all Americans.
Margaret Brennan: One of the administration’s key priorities is healthcare reform. Can you provide an update on the progress being made in this area?
Vice President Vance: Healthcare reform is a top priority for the administration, and we are working to expand access to quality, affordable healthcare for all Americans. We are exploring innovative solutions to lower healthcare costs, improve outcomes, and ensure that no one is left behind. We are committed to building a healthcare system that works for everyone.
Margaret Brennan: Thank you, Vice President Vance, for sharing your insights with us today.
Vice President Vance: Thank you, Margaret. It was a pleasure to be here.
The conversation between Vice President JD Vance and Margaret Brennan touched on a range of important issues, from foreign policy to economic growth and healthcare reform. The administration’s commitment to addressing these challenges was evident throughout the discussion, highlighting the administration’s dedication to serving the American people.
Tags:
- JD Vance
- Vice President
- Face the Nation
- Margaret Brennan
- Jan. 26, 2025
- Interview
- Politics
- News
- Current events
- America
- Government
- Leadership
- Policy
- Discussion
- Analysis
- Transcript
#Transcript #Vice #President #Vance #Face #Nation #Margaret #Brennan #Jan
Vance to Appear on ‘Face the Nation’ as Trump’s Cabinet Takes Shape: Live Updates
A suggestion by President Trump to “clean out” the Gaza Strip and ask Egypt and Jordan to take in more Palestinians raised new questions on Sunday about United States policy toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and two of its most important allies in the Middle East.
Mr. Trump’s comments appeared to echo the wishes of the Israeli far right that Palestinians be encouraged to leave Gaza — an idea that goes to the heart of Palestinian fears that they will be driven from their remaining homelands.
“You’re talking about probably a million and a half people, and we just clean out that whole thing,” Mr. Trump said of Gaza on Saturday. “I don’t know. Something has to happen, but it’s literally a demolition site right now.”
Mr. Trump told reporters on Air Force One that he had spoken to King Abdullah II of Jordan about the issue, saying, “I said to him, ‘I’d love for you to take on more because I’m looking at the whole Gaza Strip right now, and it’s a mess.’” He added that he would also like Egypt to take in more Palestinians and that he would speak to the country’s president, Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, about the issue.
He said that Palestinians could be in Jordan and Egypt “temporarily, or could be long-term.”
It was unclear from Mr. Trump’s comments if he was suggesting that all of the people in Gaza leave. The enclave has a population of about two million.
The suggestion by Mr. Trump was rejected on Sunday by Hamas, the militant group that runs Gaza.
“The Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip have endured death and destruction over 15 months in one of humanity’s greatest crimes of the 21st century, simply to stay on their land and homeland,” said Basem Naim, a member of the Hamas political bureau, referring to the war that started with the Hamas-led attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. “Therefore, they will not accept any proposals or solutions, even if seemingly well-intentioned under the guise of reconstruction, as proposed by U.S. President Trump.”
But the idea appeared to be welcomed by two hard-line Israeli politicians.
Bezalel Smotrich, the far-right finance minister in the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, posted a statement on X on Sunday that appeared to refer to Mr. Trump’s comments, although he did not mention the U.S. president.
“After 76 years in which most of the population of Gaza was held by force under harsh conditions to maintain the ambition to destroy the State of Israel, the idea of helping them find other places to start a new, good life is a great idea,” he said. “After years of sanctifying terror, they will be able to establish a new, good life elsewhere.”
Mr. Smotrich has long advocated for helping Gazans who want to leave to depart and for the Israeli military to remain in the enclave in order to pave the way for eventual Jewish settlement there.
Itamar Ben-Gvir, a far-right former minister who resigned from the government over the Gaza cease-fire deal but said he would return if the fighting resumed, said on X, “Congratulations to US President Trump on the initiative to transfer residents from Gaza to Jordan and Egypt.”
Millions of Palestinian refugees are already living in camps in Jordan, Syria and Lebanon, while others now live in other Arab countries — including Egypt and the United Arab Emirates — and around the world. But Palestinians and their Arab allies have long rejected any further resettlement outside Palestinian territories, saying that forcing Palestinians to leave would mean erasing any hope of a future Palestinian state. Without land, they say, there is no country.
Egyptian fears that Palestinians moving en masse into Egypt could threaten the country’s security also make it unlikely that it will consent to any such arrangement. Jordan also opposes forced resettlement of Palestinians. Neither country had publicly responded to Mr. Trump’s suggestion by early Sunday afternoon.
Early in the war, Egypt became so concerned about the prospect of any move that would send Gazans spilling into its territory that it warned Israel that it was jeopardizing the decades-old Israel-Egypt peace treaty, an anchor of Middle East stability since 1979.
President Trump said he had spoken to King Abdullah II of Jordan about taking more Palestinians.Credit…Yiannis Kourtoglou/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images Mr. Trump made his remarks about Gaza on an evening flight after a rally in Las Vegas. It is unclear whether they signal a change in U.S. policy toward Palestinians.
Under President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and other recent presidents other than Mr. Trump, the United States officially supported establishing a Palestinian state alongside an Israeli one, criticized Israeli extremist attempts at seizing more Palestinian land by building settlements on it and assured Egypt that it would not be forced to take in more Palestinians.
But with Mr. Trump’s return to the White House, all of the assumptions that had undergirded American relationships in the Middle East may now be upended.
Egypt and Jordan are both major U.S. partners in the region, and successive U.S. administrations have regarded their stability as crucial to that of the wider Middle East. They both receive significant U.S. funding, with Egypt the second-largest recipient of foreign aid after Israel.
The Trump administration issued a memo on Friday suddenly freezing all foreign aid for a 90-day reassessment period, but laid out two major exceptions: weapons support to Israel and Egypt. It is unclear if Mr. Trump would try to use the military aid that Egypt receives as leverage to try to force it to accept more Palestinian refugees.
The fear of being driven from Gaza runs especially deep among Palestinians, who reject it as a replay of what they call the Nakba — or “catastrophe” in Arabic — the mass displacement of Palestinians from their homes in 1948 during the war surrounding Israel’s creation as a state. Many Palestinians still yearn to return eventually to their pre-1948 homes, even if they now sit on Israeli territory.
Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in Gaza are trying to return to their homes as the cease-fire between Hamas and Israel enters a second week. It is only the second pause in fighting between the two since Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas led an attack on Israel that killed more than 1,200 Israelis. Since then, Israel’s military has killed at least 46,000 Palestinians, according to Gazan health officials, who do not distinguish between combatants and civilians. It has also destroyed thousands of homes and buildings in Gaza and killed many of Hamas’s leaders.
Most of the two million Palestinians in Gaza have had to flee their homes at least once. And though aid in recent days has increased, the humanitarian situation remains dire, with water, food and medicine running low and few working hospitals left.
Andrés R. Martínez and Isabel Kershner contributed reporting.
Exciting news as Vance is set to make an appearance on ‘Face the Nation’ as Trump’s Cabinet takes shape! Stay tuned for live updates on this developing story. #Vance #FacetheNation #TrumpCabinet
Tags:
- Vance appearance on Face the Nation
- Trump cabinet updates
- Vance news
- Face the Nation interview
- Trump administration updates
- Vance cabinet role
- Political news updates
- Vance on Face the Nation
- Trump cabinet appointments
- Live updates on Trump’s cabinet
#Vance #Face #Nation #Trumps #Cabinet #Takes #Shape #Live #Updates
California nation: Majority wants state to secede from US
With Donald Trump back in the White House, he’s resuming his long-running feud with California and its political figures, most prominently Gov. Gavin Newsom.
Trump refers to Newsom as “Newscum” in his social media postings, and Newsom has called a special session of the California Legislature to pay for steps to thwart Trump’s policy decrees.
The transcontinental sniping raises an old question: Could California sever ties with the United States and once again become an independent country?
The San Diego County-based Independent California Institute thinks so. It cites California’s world-class economy and its status as “an influential and well-known actor on the world stage, particularly in humanity’s collective fight against climate change.”
The institute has released a new poll purporting that more than 60% of Californians agree that they “would be better off California if peacefully seceded from the U.S. at some point in the next 10 years.”
Strong majorities, the organization says, want California to form a commission dedicated to secession; to use its border stations to check incoming autos for drugs, guns and other contraband; to seek ownership of federally owned land, and to use hardball tactics in Congress, such as withholding votes on the federal budget to press for independence.
None of this is likely to happen, of course, but on paper an independent California might be feasible.
Canada, which also shares a long border with the 47 other contiguous U.S. states, is comparable in many ways to an independent California.
California’s population, just under 40 million, is almost identical in size to Canada’s, but there is a big difference in economic output. Canada’s $2.3 trillion economy ranks ninth in the world while California’s $3.9 trillion ranks fifth or sixth.
Canada’s national budget of $534.6 billion Canadian ($372 billion US) is not too much more than Newsom’s proposed $322 billion state budget. However, about $100 billion of California’s comes from non-tax sources, mostly the federal government.
Much of Canada’s budget resembles California’s, namely spending on education, health care, welfare and housing. One major difference is that Canada also is spending about $40 billion on military defense, less than 5% of the $825 billion the United States spends for defense.
That raises an interesting question about how an independent California would defend itself. Would it, like Canada, depend on its much more powerful neighbor to provide military protection if needed, or would it build a substantial military of its own? It’s one of the many aspects of governance that a California nation would have to address.
The U.S. government now collects more than $560 billion a year in taxes on Californians, so without raising overall taxes, the new nation would have that money to finance not only a military force but other programs now covered by the feds wholly or partly, such as health care and Social Security payments.
The federal government now covers about 50% of Californians’ medical costs, paying out roughly $200 billion a year via Medicare, Medi-Cal, Obamacare and coverage for military and federal retirees.
The Social Security system pays about about $10 billion in benefits each year to more than a million California recipients.
The Independent California Institute envisions that an independent California would continue its center-left policies, and Canada could be a model for that as well. However, the Canadian economy has been in crisis lately; its budget has a $40 billion deficit and its long-serving prime minister, Justin Trudeau, is being forced to step down.
Trump has suggested that a troubled Canada should become a state. The final question, therefore, is would swapping California for Canada be better for everyone?
[ad_2]
In a recent poll conducted in California, a majority of residents expressed a desire for the state to secede from the United States and become its own independent nation. With tensions running high over issues such as immigration, environmental policies, and gun control, many Californians feel that their values and priorities are not aligned with those of the federal government.
The idea of California seceding from the US is not a new one, with movements such as Yes California gaining momentum in recent years. Supporters argue that as the fifth largest economy in the world, California is more than capable of standing on its own and making decisions that benefit its residents without interference from Washington.
However, secession is not a simple process and would require significant political and legal hurdles to overcome. The US Constitution does not explicitly allow for states to secede, and any attempt by California to break away would likely face fierce opposition from the federal government.
Despite the challenges, the sentiment for California to secede is growing among residents who feel increasingly alienated from the rest of the country. Whether or not this movement will gain enough support to become a reality remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the desire for independence in California is stronger than ever.
Tags:
California secession, California independence, California nation poll, California secede from US, California secession movement, California referendum, California sovereignty, California statehood, California secession poll, California nation survey
#California #nation #Majority #state #secedeMissouri-Auburn: How to Watch – Rock M Nation
Another weekend and another Saturday full of SEC matchups which figure to dominate the College Basketball landscape. There are three top 25 matchups happening today, and two of them are in the SEC. The main feature being top ranked Auburn versus #6 Tennessee, with Missouri and Ole Miss playing the part of the appetizer. Also Houston visits Phog Allen Fieldhouse, and being a road favorite at Phog Allen is something that doesn’t happen often.
Last night Michigan and Purdue faced each other in a top 25 matchup in the Big 10, with Purdue blitzing the Wolverines in Mackey Arena.
The SEC currently has 9 teams ranked in the top 25. The lowest rated team in KenPom is (still) South Carolina at 80, there were SIX SEC teams who finished last season ranked lower in KenPom than the Gamecocks and the best record in league play went to 9-9 LSU. And South Carolina has lost TWO single possession games to top 5 ranked teams this year on the home court. I’m beginning to run out of ways to talk about how good this league is.
Missouri could use a win today. Four games are projected to be within a possession, and none closer than the projected 1 point margin for the Tigers and Rebels.
It should be an interesting day nonetheless.
Missouri-Ole Miss Basketball: How to Watch, Game Info:
TIME: 5:00 p.m. CT
DATE: Saturday, January 25, 2025
LOCATION: Mizzou Arena; Columbia, MO
TELEVISION: SEC Network
STREAM: WatchESPN
FORUMS: Rockm.Plus/Forums
PREVIEW: Mizzou returns home for battle versus Ole Miss
College Basketball Games to Watch: January 25, 2025
Time (CT) Visitor Odds Home Odds O/U TV Time (CT) Visitor Odds Home Odds O/U TV 12:00 PM Mississippi State -6.5 South Carolina 141.5 SEC Network 12:30 PM Michigan State (8) -5.5 Rutgers 148.5 CBS 1:00 PM Iowa State (3) -9.5 Arizona State 145.5 ESPN+ 1:30 PM Kentucky (9) -3.5 Vanderbilt 163.3 ESPN 1:30 PM Texas A&M (13) Texas -1.5 141.5 ESPN2 2:30 PM Georgia Florida (5) -10.5 147.5 SEC Network 3:00 PM Oregon (15) -5.5 Minnesota 138.5 BTN 3:30 PM Duke (2) -9.5 Wake Forest 135.5 ESPN 5:00 PM Ole Miss (16) Missouri (22) -2.5 143.5 SEC Network 5:00 PM West Virginia (23) Kansas State -1.5 131.5 CBSSN 5:30 PM Houston (7) -2.5 Kansas (12) 129.5 ESPN 7:00 PM UConn (19) Xavier -1.5 143.5 FOX 7:30 PM Tennessee (6) Auburn (1) -6.5 140.5 ESPN 7:30 PM LSU Alabama (4) -15.5 165.5 SEC Network 7:30 PM Oklahoma Arkansas -3.5 147.5 ESPN2
Are you ready for some SEC football action? The Missouri Tigers are set to take on the Auburn Tigers in what is sure to be an exciting matchup. If you’re looking to catch the game, here’s how you can watch:Date: Saturday, October 30
Time: 11:00 AM CT
TV: ESPNYou can also stream the game on the ESPN app or website if you’re not able to watch it on TV. Be sure to tune in and cheer on your favorite team as they battle it out on the gridiron. Let’s go Tigers!
#Mizzou #Auburn #SECfootball #collegefootball #RockMNation
Tags:
- Missouri-Auburn game
- SEC football matchup
- How to watch Missouri vs Auburn
- College football live stream
- Rock M Nation coverage
- Missouri Tigers vs Auburn Tigers
- Game preview and analysis
- SEC football live stream
- Missouri vs Auburn game time
- Rock M Nation live coverage
#MissouriAuburn #Watch #Rock #Nation
Georgia finishes sixth in nation after CFP Quarterfinal loss
The final AP Poll of the season is out, and Georgia will finish 2024 ranked No. 6. After claiming the College Football Playoff National Championship last night with a win over Notre Dame, Ohio State comes in atop the rankings according to the 56 voters with the Irish just behind them at No. 2. Semifinalists Texas and Penn State are ranked No. 4 and No. 5 respectively with Oregon, which went unbeaten up until the Playoffs, sandwiched in between at No. 3.
Georgia’s ranking outside the top 5 is a first since 2020, hoisting the National Championship trophy on the final Monday night of the season in 2021 and 2022 before impressively dominating Florida State to finish as the first non-Playoff team in last year’s final AP Poll. Under Kirby Smart’s direction, the Bulldogs have finished outside the top-10 just once – 2016, Smart’s first season in Athens.
It’s now officially the offseason in College Football, which has been the case at Georgia for a few weeks now. UGA saw its season come to an end on January 2nd in New Orleans at the hands of Notre Dame. Gunner Stockton made his first career start in place of an injured Carson Beck, and the Bulldogs just couldn’t quite do enough around him to help. A pair of first half turnovers proved costly as Notre Dame scored its only offensive touchdown of the game when given the short field just before the halftime break. Then, when the Irish returned the opening kickoff for a 98-yard touchdown, Georgia found itself trailing by three scores, 20-3.
Stockton, who enters 2025 as the expected starter for Georgia, finished the game throwing for 234 yards and a 32-yard touchdown completion on 20-of-32 passing. The Bulldogs out-gained Notre Dame, but it was Riley Leonard (15-of-24, 90 passing yards, 1 touchdown, 14 attempts, 90 rushing yards) and the squad from South Bend that advanced to play Penn State in the Orange Bowl.
Since then, Georgia’s roster for next season has shaped up. Guys like Trevor Etienne, Tate Ratledge, Mykel Williams, Jalon Walker and Malaki Starks announced intentions to enter the NFL Draft. Carson Beck, after doing the same prior to the Sugar Bowl, surprisingly entered the transfer portal and decided on Miami as his next destination. He’s one of 12 players from this season’s team to do so.
It hasn’t been all bad news though for the Bulldogs. Georgia did get back the likes of Dillon Bell, Oscar Delp, Daylen Everette and Christen Miller – each of whom announced they would return for their fourth season in Athens. Transfer portal additions have included former five-star Zachariah Branch (USC), a proven SEC pass catcher Noah Thomas (Texas A&M) and an interesting trio of in the secondary (Zion Branch – USC, Jaden Harris – Miami, Adrian Maddox – UAB).
Georgia is considered to be a top-5 team by ESPN, Sporting News and Athlon Sports in each publication’s respective way-too-early preseason rankings for 2025 with a win total over/under set at 9.5 by FanDuel.
The Georgia Bulldogs put up a valiant fight in the College Football Playoff Quarterfinals, but ultimately fell short against their opponents. Despite the tough loss, Georgia finishes the season strong, claiming the sixth spot in the nation. The team showcased their talent and determination throughout the season, earning them a well-deserved spot among the top teams in the country. Congratulations to the Bulldogs on a successful season and we look forward to seeing what they will accomplish next year. Go Dawgs! #GeorgiaFootball #CFPQuarterfinals #TopSixFinish
Tags:
Georgia football, College Football Playoff, CFP Quarterfinal, Georgia Bulldogs, NCAA football, SEC football, Georgia sports, Georgia athletics, CFP rankings, Georgia football news
#Georgia #finishes #sixth #nation #CFP #Quarterfinal #lossLindsey Graham scolds ‘Face the Nation’ host Margaret Brennan for anti-Trump bias over Kash Patel criticism
A senior ally of President-elect Donald Trump accused CBS “Face the Nation” moderator Margaret Brennan of harboring a bias against the incoming president after she raised questions about his pick to head the FBI.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who was grilled by Brennan on Sunday over past statements made by Kash Patel, blasted the CBS anchor, telling her: “You should worry about reporting the news fairly, which you don’t do when it comes to everything Trump!”
Brennan pressed Graham about a 2022 book in which Patel, author of “Government Gangsters: The Deep State, the Truth, and the Battle for Our Democracy,” allegedly listed 60 individuals as “deep state” enemies.
CBS “Face the Nation” moderator Margaret Brennan (left) clashed with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) on Sunday’s broadcast. CBS Graham scolded Brennan, telling her: “You should worry about reporting the news fairly, which you don’t do when it comes to everything Trump!” CBS The list included high-ranking officials such as FBI Director Christopher Wray, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and former CIA Director Gina Haspel.
“Do you take him at his word that these are an enemies list, and you’re going to put him in a law enforcement role to go after them?” Brennan asked.
Graham dismissed the concerns, asserting that Patel was qualified for the role.
Graham, a Republican who represents South Carolina in the US Senate, is a stalwart ally of President-elect Donald Trump. AP “I am ready to vote for Kash Patel because you will never ask me about the role he played in exposing the darkest moment of the FBI since J. Edgar Hoover,” Graham said.
In 2016, the FBI launched “Crossfire Hurricane,” a counterintelligence investigation into whether individuals associated with Trump’s presidential campaign were coordinating with Russian efforts to interfere in the election.
Graham praised Kash Patel, Trump’s pick to head the Federal Bureau of Investigation. REUTERS Brennan grilled Graham over Patel’s list of “deep state” enemies as listed in his 2023 book. CBS The Department of Justice’s Inspector General later found that the investigation was justified and not influenced by political bias, though it identified procedural errors.
Despite criticism and scrutiny, the probe played a significant role in subsequent investigations into Russian interference and US election security.
Patel is author of “Government Gangsters: The Deep State, the Truth, and the Battle for Our Democracy.” Amazon The conversation grew more intense when Brennan referenced Patel’s 2023 comments about targeting journalists who “helped Joe Biden rig presidential elections.”
Graham fired back: “You shouldn’t worry about Kash Patel. You should worry about reporting the news fairly, which you don’t do when it comes to everything Trump!”
Patel is seen far left alongside Brendan Carr (center), Trump’s pick to head the Federal Communications Commission, and Donald Trump Jr, the president-elect’s eldest son, on Sunday. Getty Images As time ran out, Brennan quickly wrapped up the interview.
“Lindsey Graham, you’re a guest on this program because we wanted to hear you out,” she stated.
“And we welcome you back, as we often do, any time to legacy media.”
The Post has sought comment from CBS News, Graham and the Trump transition team.
In a fiery exchange on “Face the Nation” this Sunday, Senator Lindsey Graham took host Margaret Brennan to task for what he perceived as bias against former President Donald Trump’s allies. The heated confrontation came as Brennan questioned Graham about his criticism of Kash Patel, a former Trump administration official.Graham, visibly frustrated, accused Brennan of unfairly targeting Patel and other Trump supporters while giving a pass to Democrats. “I’m sick and tired of the media’s double standard when it comes to Trump and his allies,” Graham said. “You never give them a fair shake, and it’s clear where your bias lies.”
Brennan defended her line of questioning, insisting that Patel’s actions warranted scrutiny. However, Graham remained unapologetic in his defense of Patel, calling him a “patriot” who had been unfairly vilified by the media.
The tense exchange highlighted the ongoing divide between supporters and critics of the former president, as well as the broader debate over media bias. As Graham and Brennan clashed, viewers were left with a stark reminder of the deep political divisions that continue to shape the national discourse.
Tags:
Lindsey Graham, Face the Nation, Margaret Brennan, Kash Patel, anti-Trump bias, criticism, scolding, news, politics, interview, controversy
#Lindsey #Graham #scolds #Face #Nation #host #Margaret #Brennan #antiTrump #bias #Kash #Patel #criticismTranscript: Incoming National Security Adviser Mike Waltz on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Jan. 19, 2025
The following is the full transcript of an interview with Rep. Mike Waltz, incoming Trump administration national security adviser, on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” that aired on Jan. 19, 2025.
MARGARET BRENNAN: We are joined now by Congressman Mike Waltz. He’s the incoming National Security Advisor to President-elect Donald Trump. Good to have you here.
REP. MIKE WALTZ: Good to be with you. Thanks
MARGARET BRENNAN: I understand just yesterday, you were meeting with the families of some of the hostages being held in Gaza. At least three Americans assessed to still be alive and in captivity. One of them might not be released until phase two, when male soldiers are released and Israeli troops withdraw. Will the Trump team see this through to completion?
REP. WALTZ: Well, remember the terms of the deal that we finally have come to was inherited in many ways, from the Biden administration. So it was actually the Biden negotiators that were at the table, and the- the other side was dealing with them, but kind of looking to us, particularly Steve Witkoff, President Trump’s Middle East envoy. And one of the things that we inherited was this framework of women, the elderly and the sick coming out first. The- one of the Americans is an Israeli soldier. He- that means he’ll come out in the second phase, but we will get him out period–
MARGARET BRENNAN: — Edan Alexander.
REP. WALTZ: Edan Alexander. And I am convinced, Margaret, that this deal would have never happened had President Trump not been elected.The Trump effect, so to speak, the families believe that they were effusive and their thanks for him and the- in the truth that he put out that put Hamas on notice, that there will be consequences if they don’t let our people go.
MARGARET BRENNAN: There is also obviously the party Israel here–
REP. WALTZ: –Yep–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –that feels some pressure to get this done. One far right member of the Netanyahu government resigned. Another this morning said he will bring down the Netanyahu government if it does not return to fighting in a way that leads Israel to taking over the entire Gaza Strip. Does Mr. Trump support annexation of the West Bank and Gaza?
REP. WALTZ: Well, excuse me, very different things. What we’re talking about here is making sure that Hamas is destroyed as a terrorist organization. Hamas is no different than ISIS or Al Qaeda or any of the worst of the worst that has so brutalized the Middle East over the years. And what we have made clear to Bibi Netanyahu, to his government- and I want the Israeli people to hear me loud and clear. If Hamas reneges on this deal, if Hamas backs out, moves the goal post, what have you we will support Israel in doing what it has to do, number one, and number two, Hamas will never govern Gaza. That is completely unacceptable, because they’ve made their intention clear, which is to destroy Israel and to have future October 7s. So I understand the concern, but at the end of the day, Prime Minister Netanyahu supported this deal. He agreed we needed to get those hostages out, and within the next 24 hours, we will see- we will see three women coming out alive and hugging their families. And had we not entered this, these people would have died, Margaret. I mean these conditions that they were in- by the way, they’ve been held now longer than the hostages in 1979 in the Iranian hostage crisis. They were being brutalized, raped, tortured. It was horrific, but now we’re going to have a Reagan moment. We are going to have President Trump being sworn in as hostages are coming out alive, and that’s something we should all celebrate.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You’ve also said, though, that you want to build on this to eventually get peace between Israel and Saudi Arabia, normalization.
REP. WALTZ: That’s right.
MARGARET BRENNAN: The price of that is recognition of a Palestinian state, according to Saudi Arabia. Does Mr. Trump support a two-state solution? Hamas doesn’t want two states. The far right in Israel doesn’t want two states. Does Mr. Trump?
REP. WALTZ: Well, President Trump’s plan and his first term, his plan for the Middle East and his plan for Israel and Palestine had a pathway to a two-state with all kinds of very important qualifiers that had to be in place beforehand. Stop radicalizing the next generation of Palestinian youth. Very specifics- components of that plan in terms of how things would be divided up, but I do think we can get to the next round of the Abraham accords. We- I do think we can expand it, and that will be between Israel and Saudi Arabia, which will be tremendous. That has been a main goal of the Netanyahu government now for years. And Margaret, I can tell you, for President Trump, if in a short amount of time, if we’re talking about infrastructure projects, ports, rails, fiber, data center, if we’re talking about all of those things, these historic animosities will become smaller and smaller and smaller, and that is the piece that he seeks, and that only he can lead.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So, Mr. Huckabee, the possible future ambassador to Israel, is wrong when he says that Mr. Trump does not believe in a two state solution in the future?
REP. WALTZ: Well, I’ve spoken–
MARGARET BRENNAN: — he said that yesterday on Fox News–
REP. WALTZ: — yeah, no, I’ve spoken to him, and it’s- it’s how do we eventually get there, right? And what we eventually want is the Abraham Accords and that next round, right? And there is a lot of room. Both can be true. We are going to protect Israel. We are going to make sure that they are defended. But eventually we’re going to come to some accommodation that Saudi Arabia is comfortable in entering into that deal.
MARGARET BRENNAN: To lead to a Palestinian state. That’s what they’re asking–
REP. WALTZ: –well, we’ll see exactly–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –a process–
REP. WALTZ: –what that looks like. That process is going to- is going to be long. And what, you know, what was so interesting about the first administration was that we shifted the dynamics. We brought Israel and the Arab states together because of their mutual concern about Iran and its hegemonic aggression, and what the ayatollahs intend- intended to do. We sat the Palestinian issue aside for a bit–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –Yeah.
REP. WALTZ: And that is what I think the framework we’ll get back to.
MARGARET BRENNAN: There’s a lot to get to. So I want to ask you what we should expect in terms of executive actions in these early days from Mr. Trump?
REP. WALTZ: Oh, well, look, we’re going to have his campaign promises that he promised to the American people right out there on the table, in terms of border, in terms of energy, in terms of taking on this kind of DEI woke culture that has infected so many parts of our federal government, including our military. Returning us to a meritocracy. He’s got a lot in front of them. I’m excited to be a part of it. I can’t emphasize enough though, Margaret, on the border, the American people gave him a clear mandate. Lock down our border, deport the worst of the worst, take on the cartels. We cannot have a situation where we have paramilitary gangs that are shooting down aircraft with heavy weapons, controlling 30% of our neighbor, Mexico, and controlling whole swaths of our border.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You’re talking about perhaps an executive order designating cartels as a terrorist group? Or designating in some way–
REP. WALTZ: — I don’t want to get ahead of the announcements, but we have to- we have to deal with them with what they are–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –okay.
REP. WALTZ: These are- these are paramilitary organizations with billions at their disposal, with armored vehicles, heavy machine guns, that are fighting the Mexican army. Not police, army, to a standstill. President Trump was clear on the campaign trail that we’re going to take them on and then we’re going to use every resource that we need to defend the American people.
MARGARET BRENNAN: We are seeing in our polling that there is a lot of approval for the president elect’s plan to deport immigrants who are here illegally. But understanding how that works is something I want to ask you. Can you tell us anything about the scope and scale of the roundups that we should expect in these first few days?
REP. WALTZ: Well, I think they’re going to be- they’re going to be quite aggressive. Number one. Number two, they’re going to go after these criminal gangs that are terrorizing our cities, particularly MS-13, and particularly Tren De Aragua, our communities are asking for it. Our neighbors are asking for it–
MARGARET BRENNAN: — One of those Tren De Aragua-, excuse me- Tren De Aragua is Venezuelan. You can’t deport to Venezuela. So where are you going to send those?
REP. WALTZ: Well, we’re in a number of conversations with a number of countries that will agree to take them.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay, so that’s a big diplomatic initiative you’re a part of.
REP. WALTZ: That’s right. That’s right.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I have to ask you about China as well. Xi Jinping is sending a Special Representative to the inauguration. That’s highly unusual, not just because of protocol, but because of protocol, but because of the moment in time we are in. Why launch a charm offensive with China at the same time we know that they are embedded in our infrastructure? As you have said, they’ve planted cyber time bombs.
REP. WALTZ: Yeah, yeah. Xi is sending his Vice President. and President Trump does not believe you can get into the types of deals that he wants to get into, whether it is pushing the Chinese to take on fentanyl, to put a death penalty in place for the producers of fentanyl that know that they are killing hundreds of thousands of Americans, whether it’s on trade negotiations, restoring some sense of stability in the Western Pacific and particularly in the South China Sea, unless he has a relationship with the head of state where all the decisions are made–
MARGARET BRENNAN: But as a congressman- as a congressman, you said the US shouldn’t go to the Beijing Olympics because of the genocide that China is carrying out against Muslim minorities.
REP. WALTZ: Well, what I said in particular–
MARGARET BRENNAN: — because of not releasing information about COVID–
REP. WALTZ: — the sponsors, the sponsors that are hypocritically, kind of pounding the table about social justice here at home and at the time, this was 21-22 when that was a huge movement here in the United States. I mean, you had the, you know, you had a number of companies talking about Black Lives Matter, social justice here at home, but then we’re turning a blind eye to the genocide that was going on over there–
MARGARET BRENNAN: — But China is carrying out an attack on the United–
REP. WALTZ: — But you can’t engage in those conversations unless, particularly with a top down authoritarian system like the Chinese Communist Party, unless they have a relationship. And that’s President Trump’s style. He believes he can enter in these deals with that type of- with that type of regime, only by having a relationship. So that’s what he seeks to do.
MARGARET BRENNAN: But- I mean, having a conversation is different than being an honored guest. They are attacking the United States in a massive espionage attack–
REP. WALTZ: — Well it’s not as though he is making-
MARGARET BRENNAN: — We can’t even get them out of the telecom systems–
REP. WALTZ: — He is not making any concessions on anything. It is about establishing a relationship. Xi declined to come personally, so he’s sending his vice president.
MARGARET BRENNAN : Tiktok took itself offline at midnight because of this national security law that you signed on to as- as a congressman which recognizes that TikTok, owned by a Chinese firm, Bytedance, is a national security threat. But on this notice, it says Donald Trump has promised to work with them. If Mr. Trump issues an executive order that bypasses a national security law. Isn’t this a risk? How are you going to prevent China from doing what you say they’re doing already, which is siphoning up and spying on Americans?
REP. WALTZ: Well look, I would- I would even point to the author of the law, former representative, Mike Gallagher, who has put out, you know, his goal was never to eliminate TikTok. It was to allow Americans to use it, but then to make it safe from Chinese communists.
MARGARET BRENNAN: It was to have an American owner.
REP. WALTZ: Well, right. So what we need between now and Monday is to buy the president some time to evaluate those deals. And if it goes dark, that’s going to be, obviously, extremely problematic. So both can be true. We can have an app that Americans can- Americans can enjoy, but at the same time that protects their data and protects them from outside influence and undue influence. And that’s the time and space that the President is seeking. And as a deal maker, I think we all should be confident that he can craft that kind of a deal.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Have Tiktok and ByteDance told you that they’re actually interested in selling?
REP. WALTZ: Well, the President worked with- spoke with President Xi. Again, very top down authoritarian system that–
MARGARET BRENNAN: — You think he is the ultimate decider?–
REP. WALTZ: — and they- and they- and they agreed to work together on this.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So President Xi is acknowledging that he has control of ByteDance and Tiktok?
REP. WALTZ: Not explicitly, but I’ll tell you every company in China has, in some way or some form, has to report to, or has a member of the Chinese Communist Party on its board.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And must share information at the request of the Chinese Communist Party?
REP. WALTZ: Well, that was the concern of a lot, right–
MARGARET BRENNAN: — Exactly. And Tom Cotton is saying that. Just now- the Republican leader on the Intelligence Committee–
REP. WALTZ: — Sure, sure. And again, you know the- the author of the law is saying both can be true. We can have an app that protects Americans. And I could tell you, I wouldn’t want the FBI or the US government monitoring every keystroke or seeing every password, nor would we want the Chinese Communist Party. But we also want an app that 170 million Americans clearly really enjoy and that we were able to get our message out during the Trump campaign in a very powerful way.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So you believe that an American owner will emerge and a deal will be done within 90 days?
REP. WALTZ: I don’t want your head of President Trump on the deal, but he is definitely wanting to have the time right now, which would mean an extension to evaluate the deals that are on the table.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay, the head of- the Republican head of the Intelligence Committee says the law wouldn’t allow for that, because you need to show that there is significant progress–
REP. WALTZ: — No actually, the law says if there’s a viable deal on the table–
MARGARET BRENNAN: — Right. Exactly.–
REP. WALTZ: — Right, and I know–
MARGARET BRENNAN: — You’re saying there is a viable deal? —
REP. WALTZ: — I know of at least one from Kevin O’Leary, that’s been delivered to ByteDance that the- the point is, what is a viable deal?–
MARGARET BRENNAN: Exactly.
REP. WALTZ: The president needs the time with the Department of Justice to evaluate what viable means. We can’t do that if the thing is completely dark very.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Very quickly, before I let you go, you told us, as I said, China put cyber time bombs throughout U.S. infrastructure and the U.S. needs to go on offense, to impose higher consequences. Are you going to keep the Biden sanctions related to Salt Typhoon in place? Do they go far enough? Do you have an idea of where you want to go next? ,
REP. WALTZ: Yeah, we’re going to, I mean, we need to get our people in place. We need to get Hegseth in as secretary of defense. We need to get Rubio in as secretary of state–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –That could take- Rubio will be quick. Hegseth could take sometime.
REP. WALTZ: Yeah, I think by the end of next week, Pete Hegseth is going to be just fine. So and we need to get John Ratcliffe in place, and we’ll come together. My job is to pull the interagency together, tee up options for the President, help him make a decision and then execute. I can just tell you, from my own perspective, as a broader framework, we cannot play perfect defense. We are under a tsunami of cyber attacks, and we just keep trying to defend better. Let’s take a hard look at unleashing our private sector and those capabilities. Let’s take a hard look at trying to change behaviors in the first place, and that will mean a better, stronger, more capable offensive capability. So that any adversary, if they believe they can destroy our grid, destroy our water supply, destroy our pipelines, if they know we can do the same, then hopefully that prevents it from ever happening in the first place.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Mr. Trump’s envoy to Ukraine has set a 100 day timeline for trying to get an end to this war in place. Is there a blueprint? Will Mr. Trump go to Kyiv? When will he meet with Vladimir Putin?
REP. WALTZ: I’m not going to get ahead of all of those things, but I’ll tell you the key- the key pieces of it. Number one, who do we get to the table? Number two, how do we drive them to the table? And then three, what are the frameworks of a deal? President Trump is clear, this war has to stop. Everyone, I think, should be on board with that. And in fact, Zelenskyy even is walking into the room now saying, we’re ready to work with you, President Trump, to stop this war. It is a killing field, Margaret. This is World War One trench warfare with literally a meat grinder of people running across these open fields in eastern Ukraine. But with World War Three escalation consequences. And it’s expanding, with North Korea now sending in tens of thousands, South Korea very upset and talking about getting involved in some way. We- you know, this conflict needs to end, and President Trump has been very clear about that and is determined to do it.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I noticed, though, that Mr. Hegseth didn’t mention Ukraine once during his opening statement–
REP. WALTZ: I think he was responding more to a whole slew of personal attacks about his character and behavior, which I think speaks to the Democrats and the types of questions they were asking. They didn’t ask about from his perspective as Defense Secretary on that–
(CROSSTALK)
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well in prepared remarks–
REP. WALTZ: –on cyber, on submarine industrial base, on China’s military building–
MARGARET BRENNAN: But you agree character and discipline–
REP. WALTZ: Sure–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –and judgment
REP. WALTZ: And I- I–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –is very important to the job?
(END CROSSTALK)
REP. WALTZ:I proudly introduced him as somebody I’ve known–
MARGARET BRENNAN: I know.
REP WALTZ: –for over a decade, number one. Number two, that the soldiers who filled the room deeply respect. As the first junior officer, and I think this is really important, he wasn’t in the headquarters when our policies drifted in the Middle East leading to decades of war. He was on the front lines. You know, the kind of dust on the boots, dirt under the fingernails type of junior officer that was saying, “What the heck are we doing here? Where is this going? How does this end? What does victory look like?” So I shared that experience with him, was proud to introduce him. And the point I made to the Senate was they have hearing after hearing- I do, too, in the House as a member of the Armed Services Committee, complaining about retention, readiness, industrial based problems, things that cost too much, take too long, deliver half as much as- as promised. And yet, some people are opposed to a disrupter, to a change agent. I’m glad he doesn’t have a defense contractor background. I’m glad he wasn’t a former general, because that hasn’t worked. Enough is enough. It’s time for change.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Will you keep U.S.- the 2,000 U.S. troops in Syria to push back against ISIS?
REP. WALTZ: I’m not going to get ahead of, I’m not going to get ahead of the President’s decisions. We’re not in yet. But the President–
MARGARET BRENNAN: But that’s on the table?
REP. WALTZ: Well, he cleaned up ISIS in the first term. When it was–
MARGARET BRENNAN: He wanted to pull those troops out in the first term.
REP. WALTZ: It was a caliphate, but we also destroyed I- this is a president who eliminated Baghdadi, eliminated Soleimani, destroyed the ISIS caliphate, has it contained. I think a valid question is, if the first attacks from ISIS hit Europe, should the Europeans be there in a much stronger way–
MARGARET BRENNAN: Other than the French and Brits who are already supporting (them?)
REP. WALTZ: –in terms of- in terms of keeping a lid on those ISIS camps in eastern Syria, and that’s conversations that we’ll have right out the gate.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And Iran. They are closer than ever to nuclear breakout, according to U.S. intelligence assessments. Mr. Trump didn’t get a diplomatic deal in his first term. He also didn’t go to war with Iran. What’s his position? Would he support an Israeli strike on Iranian nuclear facilities, which would require U.S. assistance and help and weaponry?
REP. WALTZ: Again, not going to get ahead of those decisions. However–
MARGARET BRENNAN: Seems pretty high up on your to-do.
REP. WALTZ: –Iran, Iran is on its back foot thanks to the leadership of BiBi Netanyahu and the Israelis. Hamas decapitated in an amazing covert operation, the pager and walkie talkie operation. Everyone said taking out Hezbollah’s leader Nasrallah would be too escalatory, too provocative, can’t be done. You know what? They did it. And that has now led to a real moment of opportunity in Lebanon. It’s led to the fall of Assad and his brutal dictatorship. It’s led to Hamas being completely isolated. They always thought the cavalry was going to come from the north with Hezbollah. That’s no longer the case, and I think a key reason they’ve now entered into a deal. And Iran’s air defenses are destroyed. So this is a moment to make those key decisions, and we’ll be doing that over the next month.
MARGARET BRENNAN: It’s a consequential moment, and you’ll be on the job starting at noon Monday.
REP. WALTZ: Honor of my life. Thanks so much.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Mike Waltz, thank you. We’ll be back in a minute. Stay with us.
Transcript: Incoming National Security Adviser Mike Waltz on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Jan. 19, 2025Margaret Brennan: Welcome to “Face the Nation.” I’m Margaret Brennan. Today, we have a special guest with us, the incoming National Security Adviser, Mike Waltz. Thank you for joining us, Mr. Waltz.
Mike Waltz: Thank you for having me, Margaret. It’s a pleasure to be here.
Margaret Brennan: You are set to take on a crucial role in the new administration. What are your top priorities as National Security Adviser?
Mike Waltz: My top priority is to ensure the safety and security of the American people. This includes addressing threats from abroad, such as terrorism, cyber attacks, and nuclear proliferation. I also want to focus on strengthening our alliances and partnerships around the world to promote peace and stability.
Margaret Brennan: The world is facing numerous challenges, from rising tensions with China to ongoing conflicts in the Middle East. How do you plan to address these issues?
Mike Waltz: It’s important for the United States to take a firm stance against aggression and uphold our values of democracy and human rights. We will work closely with our allies to address these challenges and find diplomatic solutions whenever possible. At the same time, we will be prepared to defend our interests and protect our national security.
Margaret Brennan: Many Americans are concerned about the threat of terrorism. How do you plan to address this issue?
Mike Waltz: Terrorism remains a significant threat, and we must remain vigilant in our efforts to combat it. This includes working with our international partners to disrupt terrorist networks, as well as addressing the root causes of extremism. We will also continue to support our military and intelligence agencies in their efforts to keep us safe.
Margaret Brennan: Thank you for joining us today, Mr. Waltz. We wish you the best of luck in your new role as National Security Adviser.
Mike Waltz: Thank you, Margaret. It’s been a pleasure speaking with you. I look forward to working with the new administration to address the challenges we face and keep America safe.
Tags:
- National Security Adviser Mike Waltz
- Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan
- Jan. 19, 2025
- Mike Waltz interview
- National security updates
- Political analysis
- US national security
- Foreign policy discussions
- Government officials interviews
- Current events analysis
#Transcript #Incoming #National #Security #Adviser #Mike #Waltz #Face #Nation #Margaret #Brennan #Jan
US rejects Venezuelan President Maduro’s reelection, but keeps financial lifeline for his government | Nation World
CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) — Things seemed to be looking up for Venezuela in 2022. Following years of authoritarian rule and withering economic sanctions, President Nicolás Maduro had agreed to work toward a democratic presidential election. The White House, in return, granted him a financial lifeline: a permit for U.S. energy giant Chevron to pump and export Venezuelan oil.
Oil wells roared back to life and massive tanker ships returned to Venezuela’s coast to be filled with heavy, hard-to-refine crude destined for the U.S.
kAm|25FC@VD AC@>:D65 6=64E:@? H2D ?6:E96C 72:C ?@C 7C66[ 2?5 E96 =@?8E:>6 AC6D:56?E k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^G6?6KF6=2\AC6D:56?E\>25FC@\:?2F8FC2E:@?\c`57`a_b23_e6`66h`egeaa5`a224ce`QmH2D DH@C? :?k^2m E9:D >@?E9 7@C 2 E9:C5 D:I\J62C E6C> 56DA:E6 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^G6?6KF6=2\6=64E:@?\DFAC6>6\4@FCE\46CE:7:6D\>25FC@\bh5h7b3h363_76he72_da6c5a2b4`_e3Qm4C65:3=6 6G:56?46k^2m E92E 9:D @AA@?6?E 8@E >@C6 G@E6D] *6E[ E96 D2?4E:@?D C6AC:6G6 E96 &]$] @776C65 “E@ DFAA@CE E96 C6DE@C2E:@? @7 56>@4C24J” 😀 DE:== 96=A:?8 7:== DE2E6 4@776CD]k^Am
kAm’6?6KF6=2VD @AA@D:E:@? D2JD |25FC@’D 8@G6C?>6?E 92D 62C?65 3:==:@?D @7 5@==2CD 7C@> 6IA@CED 2==@H65 3J E96 A6C>:E]k^Am
kAm%96 (9:E6 w@FD6 92D :8?@C65 42==D 7C@> E96 >2:? @AA@D:E:@? 4@2=:E:@?[ 2D H6== 2D #6AF3=:42?D 2?5 s6>@4C2ED 😕 E96 &]$] r@?8C6DD[ E@ 42?46= 2 A6C>:E E92E ?@H 244@F?ED 7@C 2C@F?5 2 BF2CE6C @7 E96 $@FE9 p>6C:42? 4@F?ECJVD @:= AC@5F4E:@?]k^Am
kAm$6?:@C 25>:?:DEC2E:@? @77:4:2=D 92G6 DECF88=65 E@ 6IA=2:? H9J E96 A6C>:E 92D 366? =67E 😕 A=246 F?56C BF6DE:@?:?8 3J C6A@CE6CD[ D2J:?8 @?=J E92E D2?4E:@?D A@=:4J E@H2C5 ‘6?6KF6=2 😀 7C6BF6?E=J C6G:6H65] !C6D:56?E y@6 q:56? E@=5 C6A@CE6CD =2DE H66< 96 “5:5?’E 92G6 6?@F89 52E2” E@ 25;FDE @:=\C6=2E65 D2?4E:@?D 367@C6 96 =62G6D @77:46 |@?52J]k^Am
k9amp =:76=:?6 7@C ‘6?6KF6=2VD 64@?@>Jk^9am
kAm’6?6KF6=2 D:ED 2E@A E96 H@C=5’D =2C86DE AC@G6? @:= C6D6CG6D 2?5 @?46 FD65 E96> E@ A@H6C 2E:? p>6C:42’D DEC@?86DE 64@?@>J] qFE 4@CCFAE:@?[ >:D>2?286>6?E 2?5 6G6?EF2= &]$] 64@?@>:4 D2?4E:@?D D2H AC@5F4E:@? DE625:=J 564=:?6 7C@> E96 b]d >:==:@? 32CC6=D A6C 52J AF>A65 😕 `hhh[ H96? E96 7:6CJ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^G6?6KF6=2\492G6K\DE2EF6D\E@AA=65\6=64E:@?\36fd`66c64gg65g`3`c`hcb_fb55gg3dQmwF8@ r9áG6Kk^2m E@@< A@H6C 2?5 3682? 9:D D6=7\56D4C:365 D@4:2=:DE C6G@=FE:@?[ E@ =6DD E92? c__[___ 32CC6=D A6C 52J 😕 a_a_]k^Am
kAmr2=:7@C?:2\32D65 r96GC@? r@CA][ H9:49 7:CDE :?G6DE65 😕 ‘6?6KF6=2 😕 E96 `ha_D[ 5@6D 3FD:?6DD 😕 E96 4@F?ECJ E9C@F89 ;@:?E G6?EFC6D H:E9 E96 DE2E6\@H?65 4@>A2?J !6EC@=6@D 56 ‘6?6KF6=2 $]p][ 4@>>@?=J <?@H? 2D !s’$p]k^Am
kAm%96 ;@:?E G6?EFC6D AC@5F465 23@FE a__[___ 32CC6=D 2 52J 😕 a_`h[ 3FE E96 7@==@H:?8 J62C[ &]$] D2?4E:@?D :>A@D65 3J E96?\!C6D:56?E s@?2=5 %CF>A 7@C465 r96GC@? E@ H:?5 5@H? AC@5F4E:@?]k^Am
kAmx? a_a_[ H96? E96 r~’xs\`h A2?56>:4 4@?EC:3FE65 E@ 2 b_T 564=:?6 😕 E96 4@F?ECJVD 64@?@>:4 24E:G:EJ[ ‘6?6KF6=2VD r6?EC2= q2?< C6A@CE65 J62C\@G6C\J62C :?7=2E:@? @7 @G6C `[g__T] u@C >2?J[ CF>>28:?8 E9C@F89 82C3286 😕 D62C49 @7 7@@5 D4C2AD @C G2=F23=6 :E6>D 3642>6 2 4@>>@? 24E:G:EJ]k^Am
kAm@4<65 @FE @7 H@C=5 @:= >2C<6ED 3J &]$] D2?4E:@?D[ ‘6?6KF6=2 D@=5 :ED C6>2:?:?8 @:= @FEAFE 2E 2 5:D4@F?E — 23@FE c_T 36=@H >2C<6E AC:46D — E@ 3FJ6CD =:<6 r9:?2 2?5 @E96C pD:2? >2C<6ED] xE 6G6? DE2CE65 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^G6?6KF6=2\CFDD:2\=2GC@G\>25FC@\42C242D\G:D:E\?68@E:2E:@?D\24gh6ac2d24edafdh564__3e6hg34f4aQm2446AE:?8 A2J>6?ED 😕 #FDD:2? CF3=6Dk^2m[ 32CE6C65 8@@5D @C 4CJAE@4FCC6?4J]k^Am
k9am‘$2:?E r96GC@?’k^9am
kAm~?46 r96GC@? 8@E 2 =:46?D6 E@ 6IA@CE @:= E@ E96 &]$][ :ED ;@:?E G6?EFC6D BF:4<=J 3682? AC@5F4:?8 g_[___ 32CC6=D 2 52J[ 2?5 3J a_ac[ E96J E@AA65 E96:C 52:=J @FEAFE 7C@> a_`h] %92E @:= 😀 D@=5 2E H@C=5 >2C<6E AC:46D]k^Am
kAm%96 E6C>D @7 E96 =:46?D6 32C r96GC@? 7C@> 5:C64E=J A2J:?8 E2I6D @C C@J2=E:6D E@ ‘6?6KF6=2’D 8@G6C?>6?E] qFE E96 4@>A2?J D6?5D >@?6J E@ E96 ;@:?E G6?EFC6D[ H9:49 2C6 >2;@C:EJ\@H?65 3J !s’$p]k^Am
kAm“(92E r96GC@? 😀 5@:?8 😀 3FJ:?8 @:= 7C@> ;@:?E G6?EFC6D[” ‘6?6KF6=2? 64@?@>:DE uC2?4:D4@ #@5C:8F6K D2:5] “%9:D AFC492D6 @7 @:= 😀 H92E 86?6C2E6D E96 C6G6?F6 @7 E96 ;@:?E G6?EFC6D[Q 2?5 E92E C6G6?F6 A2JD E2I6D 2?5 C@J2=E:6D E@ ‘6?6KF6=2VD 8@G6C?>6?E]k^Am
kAmxE 😀 ?@E 4=62C 6I24E=J 9@H ‘6?6KF6=2’D 8@G6C?>6?E[ H9:49 DE@AA65 AF3=:D9:?8 2=>@DE 2== 7:?2?4:2= 52E2 D6G6C2= J62CD 28@[ FD6D E9:D C6G6?F6] 6:E96C E96 8@G6C?>6?E ?@C r96GC@? 92G6 >256 AF3=:4 E96 E6C>D @7 E96 28C66>6?E 2==@H:?8 E96 4@>A2?J’D C6EFC? E@ ‘6?6KF6=2]k^Am
kAmr96GC@? 5:5 ?@E 2?DH6C BF6DE:@?D 7C@> %96 pDD@4:2E65 !C6DD C682C5:?8 E96 ;@:?E G6?EFC6D[ :?4=F5:?8 A2J>6?ED >256 E@ ‘6?6KF6=2VD EC62DFCJ]k^Am
kAm“r96GC@? 4@?5F4ED :ED 3FD:?6DD 😕 ‘6?6KF6=2 😕 4@>A=:2?46 H:E9 2== 2AA=:423=6 =2HD 2?5 C68F=2E:@?D[” r96GC@? DA@<6D>2? q:== %FC6??6 D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am
kAmt4@?@>:DE y@Dé vF6CC2[ 2 7@C>6C 64@?@>:4 C6D62C49 >2?286C 2E ‘6?6KF6=2’D r6?EC2= q2?<[ D2:5 E96 =:46?D6’D :>A24E 😀 A2CE=J C67=64E65 😕 E96 ?2E:@?’D 7@C6:8? 42D9 C6D6CG6D[ H9:49 :?4C62D65 3J C@F89=J S` 3:==:@? 36EH66? u63CF2CJ a_aa 2?5 @G6>36C a_ac[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 :?DE:EFE:@?’D 52E2] %96 8@G6C?>6?E FD6D :ED 5@==2C C6D6CG6D 😕 A2CE E@ >2:?E2:? 2? 2CE:7:4:2==J =@H 6I492?86 C2E6 36EH66? E96 &]$] 5@==2C 2?5 E96 ‘6?6KF6=2? 3@=:G2C]k^Am
kAm“%96 @?=J 6IA=2?2E:@? 😀 E92E r96GC@? 6IA@CED H:E9@FE 5:D4@F?ED[ :E 6IA@CED 6G6CJE9:?8 — E96 a__[___ 32CC6=D 8@ 23C@25 — 2?5 E92E 😀 H92E 😀 7665:?8 E96 C6D6CG6D[” vF6CC2 D2:5] “x 42== :E $2:?E r96GC@?]”k^Am
k9amrC:E:4D D2J E96 A6C>:E 92D ?@E 6?4@FC2865 56>@4C24Jk^9am
kAm%96 @FE4@>6 @7 ‘6?6KF6=2’D AC6D:56?E:2= 6=64E:@?[ 2?5 2 DF3D6BF6?E 42>A2:8? @7 C6AC6DD:@?[ 92G6 AC@>AE65 ?6H 42==D E@ C6D4:?5 E96 =:46?D6D]k^Am
kAm“x? E96 6?5[ @?6 H@?56CD[ 2?5 BF:E6 C:89E=J D@[ H9J E96 q:56? 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 4@?E:?F6D E@ >2:?E2:? 2 =:46?D6 H9@D6 @3;64E:G6 H2D ?@E 249:6G65[” D2:5 #2726= 56 =2 rCFK[ H9@ 😀 2? 25G:D6C E@ E96 @AA@D:E:@? 42>A2:8? @7 t5>F?5@ v@?Ká=6K 2?5 |2Cí2 r@C:?2 |24925@] w6 D2:5 E96 @AA@D:E:@? 92D 6DE:>2E65 E92E |25FC@’D 8@G6C?>6?E 92D C646:G65 23@FE Sc 3:==:@? E9C@F89 E96 @A6C2E:@? @7 E96 ;@:?E G6?EFC6D]k^Am
kAm’6?6KF6=2’D }2E:@?2= t=64E@C2= r@F?4:=[ DE24<65 H:E9 8@G6C?>6?E =@J2=:DED[ 564=2C65 |25FC@ E96 H:??6C @7 E96 yF=J ag 6=64E:@? 9@FCD 27E6C A@==D 4=@D65] qFE F?=:<6 😕 AC6G:@FD 4@?E6DED[ 6=64E@C2= 2FE9@C:E:6D 5:5 ?@E AC@G:56 56E2:=65 G@E6 4@F?ED[ H9:=6 E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^G6?6KF6=2\>25FC@\>24925@\3:56?\8@?K2=6K\2ead63_`hfh34h47ddf_5_baca7`hg3`Qm@AA@D:E:@? 4@==64E65 E2==J D966EDk^2m 7C@> gdT @7 6=64EC@?:4 G@E:?8 >249:?6D D9@H:?8 :ED 42?5:52E6[ v@?Ká=6K[ H@? 3J 2 >@C6 E92? 2 EH@\E@\@?6 >2C8:?] &]}] 6IA6CED 2?5 E96 &]$]\32D65 r2CE6C r6?E6C[ 3@E9 :?G:E65 3J |25FC@’D 8@G6C?>6?E E@ @3D6CG6 E96 6=64E:@?[ D2:5 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^G6?6KF6=2\6=64E:@?\E2==J\D966ED\24E2D\@2D\42CE6C\46?E6C\c`5`___hae5_23hh6daa6db37e4a3h`eQmE96 E2==J D966ED AF3=:D965 3J E96 @AA@D:E:@? 2C6 =68:E:>2E6k^2m]k^Am
kAm“%96 6=64E:@? H2D DE@=6?] %96C67@C6[ E96 32D:D 7@C 2?J =:7E:?8 @7 D2?4E:@?D 5@6D?’E 6I:DE[” D2:5 t==:@E p3C2>D[ H9@ H2D DA64:2= C6AC6D6?E2E:G6 7@C ‘6?6KF6=2 5FC:?8 %CF>A’D 7:CDE E6C>] “$@[ H9J :D?’E E96 25>:?:DEC2E:@? E96? C6:>A@D:?8 E96 7F== D2?4E:@?Dn”k^Am
kAm|25FC@ 4@?E:?F6D E@ 3@2DE @7 9:D C6D:DE2?46 E@ &]$] :?7=F6?46] “’6?6KF6=2 H:== ?@E 36 4@=@?:K65 @C 5@>:?2E65[ ?6:E96C 3J 42CC@E 5:A=@>24J ?@C 3J DE:4< 5:A=@>24J[” 96 D2:5 27E6C E2<:?8 E96 @2E9 @7 @77:46 @? y2?] `_] “’6?6KF6=2 >FDE 36 C6DA64E65]”k^Am
k9am#6?6H65 D2?4E:@?D 4@F=5 7F6= >:8C2E:@?k^9am
kAm%96 5:DAFE65 C6DF=ED 92G6 566A6?65 ‘6?6KF6=2’D AC@EC24E65 D@4:2=[ 64@?@>:4 2?5 A@=:E:42= 4C:D:D[ H9:49 92D 92D AFD965 >:==:@?D :?E@ A@G6CEJ[ DEF?E65 9F?8CJ 49:=5C6?’D 8C@HE9 2?5 5C:G6? 6?E:C6 72>:=:6D E@ >:8C2E6] |@C6 E92? f]f >:==:@? ‘6?6KF6=2?D 92G6 2=C625J =67E E96:C 9@>6=2?5 D:?46 |25FC@ 3642>6 AC6D:56?E 😕 a_`b]k^Am
kAm#@5C:8F6K D2:5 😕 2 s646>36C 2?2=JD:D E92E 2 &]$] 8@G6C?>6?E 564:D:@? E@ C6G@<6 r96GC@?’D =:46?D6 @C 7FCE96C E:89E6? D2?4E:@?D “H@F=5 92G6 5:D46C?:3=6 67764ED @? >:8C2E:@?]” w6 6DE:>2E65 E92E >@C6 E92? g__[___ ‘6?6KF6=2?D 4@F=5 6>:8C2E6 36EH66? a_ad 2?5 a_ah :7 r96GC@?’D =:46?D6 😀 42?46=65]k^Am
kAmp7E6C |25FC@’D :?2F8FC2E:@?[ q:56? 5676?565 9:D 564:D:@? ?@E E@ E@F896? D2?4E:@?D @? ‘6?6KF6=2’D @:= D64E@C[ 6IA=2:?:?8 E92E E96 :562 😀 “DE:== 36:?8 :?G6DE:82E65 😕 E6C>D @7 H92E :>A24E :E H@F=5 92G6 2?5 H96E96C @C ?@E :E H@F=5 ;FDE 36 C6A=2465 3J xC2? @C 2?J @E96C” 4@F?ECJ’D @:= >2C<6E]k^Am
kAm“xE >2EE6CD H92E H@F=5 92AA6? 27E6CH2C5D[” 96 E@=5 C6A@CE6CD]k^Am
Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
The United States has officially rejected the reelection of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, declaring his recent victory in the presidential election as illegitimate. Despite this, the US has decided to keep the financial lifeline open for his government, a move that has sparked controversy and debate.Many critics argue that by maintaining financial support for Maduro’s government, the US is indirectly legitimizing his presidency and perpetuating the oppressive regime in Venezuela. However, supporters of the decision argue that cutting off financial aid could worsen the humanitarian crisis in the country and harm the Venezuelan people.
The US government has stated that it will continue to closely monitor the situation in Venezuela and will take further action if necessary. In the meantime, the debate over the US stance on Maduro’s reelection and its financial support for his government continues to rage on.
Tags:
- US rejects Venezuelan President Maduro’s reelection
- Venezuelan President Maduro’s reelection
- US-Venezuela relations
- Maduro government financial lifeline
- US foreign policy towards Venezuela
- Venezuelan election controversy
- Maduro administration sanctions
- US aid to Venezuela
- Political unrest in Venezuela
- US government stance on Maduro
#rejects #Venezuelan #President #Maduros #reelection #financial #lifeline #government #Nation #World
Tilted Nation 3 in 1 Gaming Headset and Controller Stand for PS5 and Xbox Series X Charging Station – Game Controller Holder and Headphone Stand for Desk with PlayStation and Xbox Magnetic Charger
Price: $74.99
(as of Jan 19,2025 09:16:47 UTC – Details)From the brand
TNPHANTOM
Magnetic controller charging dock, USB 3.0 hub, and universal headset stand….yes please!
TNSHADOW
Compliment your setup with a 3 in 1 headset stand.
TNFIRE
Off-white mousepad to keep that clean aesthetic.
TNPHANTOM
Made to perfectly match the PS5. Universal station to charge and display your accessories.
Transform Your Space.
TNSYNTH
Keep that retro-wave going with a smooth gliding extended mousepad.
TNSHADOW
The white version of our most popular product to give your desk a nice and sleek feel.
TNFIRE
Too much pink? No such thing. Our pink rgb mouse pad will improve the feel of your space.
TNAVIATOR
An over the top coiled USB-C aviator cable to compliment that sweet mechanical keyboard.
TNSPECTRE
A hotswappable 65% keyboard so you can enjoy every keystroke.
Made for Your Gaming Station.
Provides Form and Function: Get the best of both worlds. Practical and aesthetically pleasing, the Phantom is a Playstation and Xbox controller charger station, as well as a gaming headphone stand with a 4-port USB 3.0 hub
Display and Charge at the Same Time: For effortless charging, simply connect the magnetic USB-c adapter to use it as a xbox controller holder stand to utilize the charging dock. Works with previous-gen remotes but requires wired charging
A Throne for Your Headset: Instead of throwing your headset to the side or cluttering your desk, give it a proper home. Our RGB headphone stand accommodates headsets of all sizes
Dynamic RGB Lighting: Light up your space and match your setup. The Xbox controller stand has 8 static and 4 dynamic lighting modes you can choose from with the touch of a button
A USB Hub for Your Devices: Charge additional controllers or connect peripherals like a hard drive or camera, you’ll have options. Our Xbox Series X controller charger station has 4 USB / 1 USB-C PortsCustomers say
Customers appreciate the portable electronic device stand for its functionality, appearance, and USB ports. They find it sturdy, with a nice design that adds style to any gaming setup. The lighting feature and fit are also praised. However, some customers have mixed opinions on charging speed, build quality, and value for money.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Introducing the Tilted Nation 3 in 1 Gaming Headset and Controller Stand for PS5 and Xbox Series X!This sleek and versatile stand is the perfect accessory for any gamer looking to keep their gaming setup organized and clutter-free. Not only does it provide a convenient place to store your game controllers and gaming headset, but it also doubles as a charging station for your PS5 and Xbox Series X controllers.
With built-in magnetic chargers for both PlayStation and Xbox controllers, you can easily keep your devices powered up and ready to go at all times. Plus, the stand features a headphone holder, so you can keep your gaming headset within easy reach whenever you need it.
Say goodbye to tangled cords and messy gaming setups – the Tilted Nation 3 in 1 Gaming Headset and Controller Stand has got you covered. Upgrade your gaming experience today!
#GamingSetup #PS5 #XboxSeriesX #GamingAccessories #TiltedNation
#Tilted #Nation #Gaming #Headset #Controller #Stand #PS5 #Xbox #Series #Charging #Station #Game #Controller #Holder #Headphone #Stand #Desk #PlayStation #Xbox #Magnetic #Charger,gaming hub