Tag Archives: Orders

These Trump executive orders look a lot like Project 2025


As a candidate, Donald Trump said he knew “nothing” about Project 2025, the conservative playbook put together by a group of some of his former top advisers.

As president, he’s following through on a lot of its ideas.

Some overlap between a Republican president and a conservative think tank’s policy ideas would be expected, but Trump’s immediate embrace of very specific ideas in the 900-page proposal makes his disavowals of it on the campaign trail seem disingenuous, at best.

In some cases, Project 2025 was building on Trump’s ideas, as with its proposal to reimplement a plan from his first term to gain more control over federal workers. In other cases, such as withdrawing from a global tax deal, the Trump administration seems to be picking up on an idea in Project 2025 that the candidate hadn’t said much about.

That list is likely to grow. Just last week, Trump floated the idea of overhauling or eliminating the Federal Emergency Management Agency — in line with a proposal from Project 2025 to send more disaster funding directly to states.

Below, we took a look at Trump administration decisions that echo proposals from Project 2025.

Suspending refugee admissions

White House: Suspended the Refugee Admission Program, with the possibility of renewing it every 90 days based on the advice of the secretary of state. (Executive Order)

Project 2025: Proposed an “indefinite curtailment” of the number of refugees admitted under the U.S. Refugee Admission Program to shift resources to immigration enforcement. (p. 178)

Notable: The executive order cites Springfield, Ohio, where Trump falsely claimed immigrants were stealing and eating pets during the campaign.

Suspending asylum claims

White House: Suspended all claims of asylum at the southern border until the president issues a finding that “the invasion at the southern border has ceased.” (Executive Action)

Project 2025: Proposed raising the standards for “credible fear of persecution” for asylum-seekers and specifying that fear of gangs and domestic violence aren’t grounds for asylum. (p. 148)

Notable: The executive order doesn’t use the word “asylum” at all, instead citing “section 208 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1158,” the section of U.S. law governing asylum claims.

Militarizing the southern border

White House: Directed the Defense Department to send active-duty military personnel and the National Guard to the southern border because of a “national emergency.” (Executive Action)

Project 2025: Proposed sending active-duty military personnel and National Guard members to “assist in arrest operations along the border” involving drug cartels. (p. 555)

Notable: The White House goes further than Project 2025, which only proposed that military personnel be considered to fight criminal organizations.

Declaring there are only two genders

White House: Declared that the federal government will define gender as only male or female for purposes of federal documents and prison assignments. (Executive Order)

Project 2025: Proposed that Health and Human Services “proudly state that men and women are biological realities” (p. 489) and end programs that recognize transgender Americans. (p. 450)

Notable: The executive order defining gender as beginning “at conception” was criticized by scientists for being biologically inaccurate.

Drilling for oil and gas in Alaska

White House: Directed federal agencies to expedite permitting for oil and natural gas in Alaska, with a priority on liquefied natural gas projects. (Executive Order)

Project 2025: Proposed opening more areas of Alaskan wilderness owned by the federal government for oil and natural gas exploration and development. (p. 523)

Notable: Another executive order froze funding from two Biden-era laws that would have gone to clean energy projects in Alaska, including hydroelectric dams, wind turbines and solar energy.

Withdrawing from the Paris climate agreement

White House: Withdrew from the Paris climate agreement, including any related agreements and any financial commitments. (Executive Order)

Project 2025: Proposed ending a “global, climate-themed agenda” (p. 418) to the “perceived threat of climate change” (p. 419) by ending programs designed to meet the Paris climate agreement (p. 257).

Notable: Trump also withdrew the United States from the Paris climate agreement in his first term. President Joe Biden then signed an executive order rejoining it.

Withdrawing from the World Health Organization

White House: Withdrew from the World Health Organization, a specialized agency of the United Nations that focuses on global health. (Executive Order)

Project 2025: Proposed reducing support — “up to and including withdrawal” — for the WHO, which it argued showed a “manifest failure and corruption” during the pandemic. (p. 191)

Notable: Trump has attacked the WHO since 2020 over its approach to the pandemic and took steps in his first term to withdraw.

Withdrawing from a global tax deal

White House: Withdrew from a global corporate minimum tax deal under the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (Executive Action)

Project 2025: Proposed withdrawing from the OECD entirely, calling it “little more than a taxpayer-funded left-wing think tank and lobbying organization.” (p. 698)

Notable: The 2021 global tax deal was negotiated by the Biden administration with nearly 140 countries.

Ending protections for federal workers

White House: Reinstated an executive order creating Schedule F with minor changes and revoked another Biden-era executive order protecting federal workers. (Executive Order)

Project 2025: Proposed reinstating Schedule F, created by an executive order at the end of Trump’s first term, which gave the president more power to fire federal workers. (p. 80)

Notable: The executive order renames “Schedule F,” which had become controversial, as “Schedule Policy/Career.”

Ending diversity, equity and inclusion programs

White House: Ended diversity, equity and inclusion (or DEI) programs, mandates, policies, preferences and activities at federal agencies and targeted federal contractors. (Executive Order)

Project 2025: Proposed deleting the term “diversity, equity and inclusion” from every federal rule, regulation, contract, grant, regulation or legislation. (p. 3)

Notable: The Air Force briefly interpreted Trump’s order as requiring it to stop teaching about the Tuskegee Airmen and Women Airforce Service Pilots during World War II.

Freezing federal job hiring

White House: Ordered a hiring freeze on all federal civilian employees in the executive branch except the military or immigration, national security or law enforcement positions. (Executive Action)

Project 2025: Proposed a freeze on all top career-position hiring to “prevent ‘burrowing in’ by outgoing political appointees” and noted that several recent presidents began with hiring freezes. (p. 79)

Notable: Trump has also sought to reduce the federal workforce by ending work-from-home policies, an idea proposed in Project 2025 for only the Environmental Protection Agency’s lawyers. (p. 443)

Revoking security clearances

White House: Revoked the security clearances of dozens of former senior intelligence officials for signing an open letter in 2020 raising questions about Hunter Biden’s laptop. (Executive Order)

Project 2025: Stated that the intelligence community faced a “crisis of confidence” over the Hunter Biden story and called for revoking security clearances for people who talk with the media. (p. 213)

Notable: Trump also ended the Secret Service detail assigned to protect former national security adviser John Bolton from assassination threats from Iran.

Ending efforts to fight misinformation

White House: Ended federal efforts to fight misinformation, disinformation and malinformation, claiming they infringed on freedom of speech. (Executive Order)

Project 2025: Called for barring the FBI from engaging in any activities related to “combating the spread of so-called misinformation or disinformation.” (p. 550)

Notable: Research doesn’t support the claim that conservatives are unfairly targeted by fact-checkers for spreading misinformation.



Recently, President Trump has signed a series of executive orders that bear a striking resemblance to Project 2025, a controversial plan proposed by his administration earlier this year. The orders, which cover a wide range of policy areas including immigration, healthcare, and environmental regulations, have drawn criticism from both political opponents and advocacy groups.

Many have pointed out that the similarities between these executive orders and Project 2025 are too close to be a mere coincidence. Both initiatives aim to drastically reshape the government’s approach to various issues, often at the expense of marginalized communities and the environment.

Critics argue that these orders represent a dangerous shift towards authoritarianism and a disregard for the rule of law. They fear that the administration is using these executive actions to bypass Congress and push through its agenda without proper oversight or accountability.

As the country grapples with the implications of these executive orders, it is crucial for citizens to stay informed and engaged in order to hold their elected officials accountable. The resemblance to Project 2025 is a worrying sign of what may be to come if unchecked.

Tags:

Trump executive orders, Project 2025, presidential executive orders, US politics, executive orders analysis, Trump administration, government policies, current affairs, political analysis

#Trump #executive #orders #lot #Project

Trump signs several orders focused on reshaping US military


Bernd Debusmann Jr

BBC News, White House

Thomas Mackintosh

BBC News, London

Reuters U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters aboard Air Force One before arriving at Joint Base AndrewsReuters

President Trump vowed on the campaign trail to cut down on equal opportunity programmes and bring about major changes to the US military

US President Donald Trump has signed several executive orders focused on reshaping the US military.

One order signed late on Monday bans diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in the military. It will remove the use of race- or sex-based preferences in the armed forces, the Defense Department and the Homeland Security Department.

Another reinstates more than 8,000 service members who were discharged for refusing to get the Covid-19 vaccine.

The White House added that a third executive order tasks officials with formulating a policy on transgender troops. The action does not immediately ban transgender service members.

A fourth order mandates a process to develop an “American Iron Dome” – similar to the one used by Israel in the Middle East; while the White House says a proclamation has been signed to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz.

The executive orders were signed by Trump on board Air Force One.

Removing DEI programmes from within the federal government was one of Trump’s central campaign promises – and one he has moved swiftly to implement upon taking office last week.

DEI programmes aim to promote participation in workplaces by people from a range of backgrounds.

Their backers say they address historical underrepresentation and discrimination against certain groups, including racial minorities, but critics say such programmes can themselves be discriminatory.

The Trump administration claims that removing these initiatives from the US military will help boost recruitment levels.

Defence officials have previously said that the military services collectively missed recruitment goals by 41,000 personnel in the 2023 fiscal year.

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has promised to eliminate similar initiatives from the military, telling reporters on Monday that “there are more executive orders coming”.

Removing DEI from the military

The order entitled “restoring America’s fighting force” includes a ban on what the administration considers discriminatory race or sex-based preferences by any branch of the military, Department of Defense or the Department of Homeland Security.

Additionally, any remaining DEI-related bureaucracy will be eliminated from those departments., the document said.

Within 90 days of the executive order being signed, the President says the Secretary of Defense will carry out “an internal review that documents actions taken in pursuit of DEI initiatives, including all instances of race and sex discrimination and activities designed to promote a race- or sex-based preferences system”.

It remains unclear what specific programmes will be affected by the order.

Watch: Pete Hegseth supports removing DEI from US Defence Department and continuing mass deportation

In a December 2020 report, the department’s Board on Diversity and Inclusion recommended a number of steps, including the removal of “aptitude test barriers that adversely impact diversity” and incorporating the “value of cultivating diversity and inclusion” into leadership and professionalism curricula.

Over the weekend, it was reported that the US Air Force was reviewing material on the role of black and female pilots during World War Two from its training programmes as part of an effort to comply with Trump’s DEI orders.

But on Sunday, military officials clarified that certain curricula will not be removed from basic military training.

During the campaign in June, Trump said the military’s purpose is “to win wars, not to be woke”.

Hegseth told reporters on Monday that the job of the military is “lethality and readiness and war fighting”.

“Military training will be focused on the readiness of what our troops in the field need to deter our enemies,” he added.

The move forms part of a larger, government-wide effort to remove DEI practices from the federal workforce.

Immediately after taking office, Trump ordered that all US government staff working on DEI schemes were to be put on immediate paid administrative leave.

The White House gave them until 17:00 EST (2200 GMT) the following day to be put on leave before the offices and programmes in question were shut down.

In an order, Trump said that the programmes were “dangerous, demeaning and immoral”.

On Monday, the Department of Veterans Affairs also said it had has placed almost 60 employees on leave as it works to implement Trump’s order last week to eliminate DEI from federal workplaces.

In a statement, the department said that the salary of the employees – who were solely focused on DEI initiatives – were collectively paid about $8m, an average of about $136,000 (£109,000) per year. One employee was making over $220,000 a year.

Banner titled 'Trump's Inauguration' with red and purple stripes and white stars

Transgender troops

Trump also signed an executive order directing the military to formulate policies regarding the inclusion of transgender troops and update any guidance on the topic.

According to documents published by the White House, the president’s executive order on “prioritising military excellence and readiness” says “expressing a false ‘gender identity’ divergent from an individual’s sex cannot satisfy the rigorous standards necessary for military service”.

A White House fact sheet uses the term “trans-identifying” rather than transgender.

It is unclear how many transgender personnel are serving in the US military – although previous estimates from researchers have put the figure at between 9,000 and 15,000.

As part of the order, the use of pronouns will be forbidden across the defence department, and the order also says males will be explicitly forbidden from using facilities designated for females.

In 2021, then-President Joe Biden signed an order allowing transgender people to serve in the military and preventing discharges based on gender.

During most of Trump’s first term at the White House, transgender personnel were banned from joining or serving unless they received a waiver.

The Trump administration has claimed members who undergo transition surgery are often incapable of the physical demands of their jobs – potentially harming military readiness. The White House did not provide evidence of this claim and the BBC has reached out to the Pentagon for comment.

Sparta, an organisation which advocates on behalf of transgender military personnel, criticised the order, saying that transgender troops have served in combat zones and have “demonstrated their ability” to operate in military units.

“While some transgender troops do have surgery, the recovery time and cost is minimal, and is scheduled so as not to impact deployments or mission readiness,” said Sue Fulton, an army veteran and senior advisor to Sparta.

“The readiness and physical capabilities of transgender service members is not different from that of other service members,” Fulton added.

In 2017, the Palm Center – an independent research organisation – estimated that removing about 10,000 transgender troops from the military could cost approximately $960m.

Reinstating troops who refused vaccines

The third order reinstates US military personnel who were discharged for refusal to accept Covid-19 vaccinations during the pandemic.

Those service members will be reinstated with full back pay and benefits, and receive their former rank.

In his inauguration speech, Trump said that these service members were “unjustly expelled”.

About 8,000 US military personnel were discharged from service for refusing the vaccines between 2021 and 2023 – of which only 43 were reinstated before Trump’s return to the White House.

A former high-ranking Pentagon official – who spoke on condition of anonymity – told the BBC that their refusal to take vaccines was tantamount to damaging “good order” and discipline.

The official called the reinstatement of the troops “concerning” and said he feared it could create a precedent to be able to opt out of other vaccines, such as those given to service members for yellow fever or smallpox.



President Trump took a significant step towards reshaping the US military with the signing of several orders aimed at bolstering national security and modernizing the armed forces. The orders cover a range of areas, from increasing defense spending to streamlining procurement processes and promoting technological innovation.

One of the key orders signed by President Trump directs the Department of Defense to develop a comprehensive plan to rebuild and modernize the US military. This includes increasing the size of the Army and Marines, expanding the Navy and Air Force, and enhancing the capabilities of the National Guard and Reserves.

Another order focuses on improving the procurement process for military equipment, with the goal of reducing costs and speeding up the delivery of critical weapons systems. This will involve cutting red tape and streamlining regulations to ensure that the military has access to the latest technology and equipment in a timely manner.

In addition, President Trump signed an order to promote innovation in the defense industry, encouraging collaboration between the government and private sector to develop cutting-edge technologies and capabilities. This will help ensure that the US military remains at the forefront of military technology and maintains its competitive edge on the global stage.

Overall, these orders mark a significant step towards reshaping the US military and ensuring that it is prepared to meet the challenges of the 21st century. President Trump’s focus on increasing defense spending, streamlining procurement processes, and promoting technological innovation will help strengthen national security and enhance the capabilities of the armed forces.

Tags:

  1. Trump executive orders
  2. US military reshaping
  3. Trump military policies
  4. Defense department changes
  5. National security updates
  6. Trump military strategy
  7. Pentagon reforms
  8. US armed forces restructuring
  9. Trump administration defense
  10. Military policy updates

#Trump #signs #orders #focused #reshaping #military

National Science Foundation freezes grant review in response to Trump executive orders : Shots


With funding from the National Science Foundation and other government grants, scientists and meteorologists from the Center for Severe Weather Research studying a storm in Oklahoma in 2017. They get close to supercell storms and tornadoes trying to better understand their formation and prediction.

With funding from the National Science Foundation and other government grants, scientists and meteorologists from the Center for Severe Weather Research study a storm in Oklahoma in 2017. They get close to supercell storms and tornadoes to better understand their formation and improve prediction.

Drew Angerer/Getty Images North America


hide caption

toggle caption

Drew Angerer/Getty Images North America

The National Science Foundation canceled all of its grant review panels this week, as the organization works to align its grantmaking process with new executive orders from the Trump administration.

The NSF funds a wide range of scientific research through grants to universities and research institutions. It convenes panels of experts to weigh the merits of those proposals, ultimately informing which receive federal funding. It has a budget of around $9 billion.

More than 60 of those meetings were scheduled for this week, all of which were abruptly canceled Monday morning. The move sparked confusion among panelists as to the extent of the pause. In a statement to NPR, an NSF spokesperson said that all review panels will be rescheduled. “This will allow the agency to make the best use of everyone’s time and resources as we continue to develop guidance to ensure compliance with the recent executive orders.”

Romi Burks, a biologist at Southwestern University in Georgetown, Texas, had spent weeks preparing to serve on her NSF panel. “It’s a considerable amount of effort,” she said. “It’s extremely disappointing for it to be canceled for political reasons.”

Delays in grant approval inevitably mean delays in funding research. Those delays could threaten the scientists, who include tenured faculty, post-doctoral researchers and graduate students who often depend on grants for financial support. Delays also create extra uncertainty that makes it hard to plan, says Burks. Researchers need to schedule travel for field work, or arrange time to collaborate with colleagues. “All of these things cannot happen until you have notification,” she says. “It’s already a long time to get grants reviewed, any more time is just an increasing burden.”

It’s unclear which executive orders are responsible for the freeze, though researchers suspect it may be related to President Trump’s targeting of diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. NSF reviews grant applications based on two criteria: intellectual merit and broader impacts. The latter is a catch-all term that assesses how the research would benefit society. Historically, a crucial component of those broader impacts relate to increasing the participation of underrepresented groups in the scientific process.

The pause comes at a time of heightened anxiety and confusion in the U.S. research community. Last week, the National Institutes of Health — the largest public funder of biomedical research in the world — canceled its scientific meetings and study sections, which also helps determine which research to fund.

NSF also has review panels scheduled for next week. An agency spokesperson declined to confirm whether they’d also be rescheduled.



The National Science Foundation (NSF) has announced that it will freeze all grant reviews in response to recent executive orders issued by President Trump. The executive orders, which aim to cut funding for scientific research and limit the agency’s ability to support certain types of research, have raised concerns among the scientific community.

In a statement released by the NSF, the agency expressed its commitment to upholding the integrity of the scientific review process and ensuring that all research proposals are evaluated in a fair and impartial manner. However, the agency also noted that it will need time to assess the potential impact of the executive orders on its grant review process.

Scientists and researchers have expressed their dismay at the news, with many expressing concerns about the future of scientific research in the United States. Some have called on the NSF to take a stand against the executive orders and defend the agency’s mission to support cutting-edge scientific research.

As the NSF works to navigate these uncertain times, it remains to be seen how the agency will proceed with its grant review process and support the scientific community in the face of challenges posed by the Trump administration. Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story.

Tags:

  • National Science Foundation
  • Grant review
  • Trump executive orders
  • Science funding
  • NSF grant freeze
  • Federal grant review
  • Research funding
  • Government policy impact
  • Science community response
  • NSF grant process

#National #Science #Foundation #freezes #grant #review #response #Trump #executive #orders #Shots

Trump announces four new executive orders, including to build ‘Iron Dome’ | Donald Trump News


United States President Donald Trump has announced he would sign an executive order calling for the construction of an “Iron Dome” missile defence programme.

On Monday, Trump addressed a retreat for Republican lawmakers at his south Florida golf resort, the Trump National Doral Miami, where he pledged to bolster US military assets with executive action later in the evening.

“We have to have a strong, strong defence,” Trump said from the podium. “And in a little while, I’ll be signing four new executive orders.”

The first, he explained, was to “immediately begin the construction of a state-of-the-art Iron Dome missile defence shield, which will be able to protect Americans”.

Two more orders, he added, would be aimed at removing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and getting “transgender ideology the hell out of our military”.

A fourth order would also reinstate service members who were discharged for refusing to comply with mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic. About 8,000 members had been discharged for that reason between August 2021 to January 2023.

Trump framed the actions as necessary to ensure the US has “the most lethal fighting force in the world”.

A flood of executive orders

Monday’s announcement marked yet another ripple in a tsunami of executive actions Trump has undertaken since returning to the White House on January 20.

According to officials, Trump signed a record number of executive actions on his first day in office, amounting to a total of 42 orders, memorandums and proclamations.

Many of those initial orders pertained to immigration and social issues. For instance, he made a move to end birthright citizenship, a constitutionally protected right that endows anyone born in the US with citizenship.

But some of his early executive orders overlapped with those unveiled on Monday.

He called for the end of government DEI programmes, which he accused of perpetrating “illegal and immoral discrimination”. And he signed another order declaring that male and female gender identities are “not changeable”.

But the latest raft of orders deals directly with the makeup of the US military and its strategic priority.

Monday’s orders, for example, echo a “transgender military ban” that Trump pursued in 2017, during his first term in office. That ban was later reversed by President Joe Biden in 2021.

An estimated 8,000 service members are transgender – though more may fear to identify themselves publicly.

The executive orders Trump unveiled also coincided with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s first day at the Pentagon.

Hegseth, a veteran and former Fox News host, has previously railed against what he described as a “woke” ideology overtaking the military and questioned whether women should serve in combat roles.

As head of the Pentagon, Hegseth has pledged to oversee a vast overhaul of the military leadership and restore a “warrior culture” in the armed forces.

Hesgeth overcame allegations of sexual abuse and alcoholism to be confirmed to his post by 50 Republican senators on Friday.

Three Republicans, including former Senate party leader Mitch McConnell, opposed his nomination.

Building an ‘Iron Dome’

Trump’s executive order to build an “Iron Dome” fulfils a pledge the Republican leader made on the campaign trail.

The Iron Dome refers to a US-funded air defence system in Israel that detects and intercepts incoming rockets.

Trump had repeatedly described his desire to top Israel’s Iron Dome system in his campaign for re-election in 2024.

In an August broadcast on the social media platform X, he told billionaire Elon Musk he planned to build “the best Iron Dome in the world”.

And in July, he added the Iron Dome proposal to the Republican Party’s official platform.

But military experts have repeatedly questioned whether such a system is necessary, or even feasible, for the US.

The system used in Israel currently only protects against relatively low-power rockets and mortars. And Israel itself is only about the size of New Jersey, one of the US’s smaller states.

Experts say creating a similar system across the vast US mainland would be cost-prohibitive, not to mention possibly ineffective, given the advanced firepower of potential adversaries like Russia and China.

Observers also point out that the US already has missile defence programmes in place, including the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system and the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) programme.

The future of Trump’s Iron Dome project is also unclear, as it is all but assured to require funding appropriated by Congress.

“You know, we protect other countries, but we don’t protect ourselves,” Trump said on Monday.

“Now we have phenomenal technology. You see that with Israel where, out of 319 rockets, they knock down just about every one of them. So I think the United States is entitled to that.”



In a surprise move, former President Donald Trump announced four new executive orders, one of which includes the construction of an ‘Iron Dome’ defense system. The Iron Dome, a missile defense system developed by Israel, is designed to intercept and destroy short-range rockets and artillery shells fired from distances of 4-70 kilometers away.

Trump’s decision to implement an Iron Dome defense system in the United States comes as tensions continue to rise in the Middle East and other parts of the world. The former President cited the need for increased security measures to protect American citizens from potential threats, both foreign and domestic.

In addition to the Iron Dome order, Trump also signed executive orders related to immigration, healthcare, and national security. The specifics of these orders have yet to be disclosed, but they are expected to be met with controversy and resistance from political opponents.

Critics of the former President have already begun to voice their concerns over the cost and feasibility of implementing an Iron Dome defense system in the United States. However, Trump remains steadfast in his commitment to ensuring the safety and security of the American people.

As more details emerge about these executive orders, it is clear that Trump’s influence on American politics and policy is far from over. Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story.

Tags:

  1. Trump executive orders
  2. Iron Dome
  3. Donald Trump news
  4. Trump administration updates
  5. US politics
  6. White House announcements
  7. Executive orders explained
  8. National defense initiatives
  9. Trump policy decisions
  10. Breaking news from Trump administration

#Trump #announces #executive #orders #including #build #Iron #Dome #Donald #Trump #News

22 killed as residents of southern Lebanon defy Israeli orders not to return home




CNN
 — 

At least 22 people were killed and 124 others injured by Israeli forces in southern Lebanon, the Lebanese Health Ministry said, as residents of villages near the border defied orders by Israel’s military not to return to their homes.

The deaths come as a deadline expired Sunday for Israel to withdraw forces from the area, as part of a ceasefire agreement that ended months of conflict with Hezbollah.

Under the November ceasefire agreement, both Israeli and Hezbollah forces agreed to withdraw from southern Lebanon by January 26, the end of a 60-day period stipulated in the deal.

But Israel’s government said Friday that the military would not withdraw all of its forces from southern Lebanon by Sunday’s deadline, blaming Lebanon for failing to uphold its end of the agreement. The Lebanese army in turn accused Israel of “procrastination.”

Lebanon’s Ministry of Public Health said the Israeli military launched attacks on Lebanese citizens on Sunday attempting to enter towns still occupied by Israeli forces.

Of those killed, one was a soldier “targeted by gunfire from the Israeli enemy,” the Lebanese army said.

Video verified by CNN showed residents on foot in Kfar Kila, southern Lebanon, trying to return to their villages. Some were seen carrying Hezbollah flags, while others held images of militant fighters killed in the war.

It comes after Israel’s military issued a fresh order on Sunday to residents of dozens of southern Lebanese villages not to return to their homes.

“Urgent!! A new reminder to the residents of southern Lebanon: Until further notice you are prohibited from moving south to the line of villages and their surroundings,” Avichay Adraee, Arabic-language spokesperson for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), wrote on X.

The post included a map of southern Lebanon with an area along the border with Israel shaded red and a list of more than 60 villages residents were prohibited from accessing.

A man carries an injured person in Burj al-Muluk on Sunday.

“The Defense Forces do not intend to target you and therefore at this stage you are prohibited from returning to your homes from this line south until further notice. Anyone who moves south of this line puts themselves at risk,” Adraee said.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said its troops operating in southern Lebanon “fired warning shots to remove threats in a number of areas where suspects were identified approaching the troops.”

The Israeli military added it had apprehended numerous suspects for questioning, claiming they posed and “imminent threat to the troops.”

Lebanon’s president Joseph Aoun said he was “monitoring this issue at the highest levels” in a statement.

“Lebanon’s sovereignty and the unity of its territory are not subject to compromise,” he said and promised residents of the south he would “ensure your rights and dignity.”

The United Nations called on both sides to urgently recommit to the agreement while its peacekeeping force said it was deploying to areas in southern Lebanon at the request of the Lebanese army.

The president of France, Emmanuel Macron urged Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to withdraw his remaining forces from Lebanon in a phone call on Sunday, according to the French President’s office. France played a key role in brokering the ceasefire deal alongside the US last November.



In a tragic turn of events, 22 residents of southern Lebanon were killed as they defied Israeli orders not to return home. The residents had been displaced due to ongoing conflict in the region, but decided to return to their homes despite warnings from Israeli forces.

The deadly incident occurred when Israeli forces launched an airstrike on a residential area in southern Lebanon, targeting those who had disobeyed their orders. The strike resulted in the deaths of 22 individuals, including women and children.

The international community has condemned the attack, calling for an immediate ceasefire and the protection of civilians. The United Nations has called for an investigation into the incident and for those responsible to be held accountable for their actions.

The tragic loss of life serves as a stark reminder of the devastating impact of war and conflict on innocent civilians. Our thoughts are with the families and loved ones of those who lost their lives in this senseless attack.

Tags:

  1. Lebanon news
  2. Southern Lebanon
  3. Israeli orders
  4. Homecoming
  5. Conflict in Lebanon
  6. Middle East updates
  7. Lebanon residents
  8. Civilian casualties
  9. Israeli-Lebanese tensions
  10. Southern Lebanon conflict
  11. Lebanon crisis
  12. Human rights violations
  13. Lebanon resistance
  14. International news
  15. Lebanon violence
  16. Lebanese civilians
  17. War in the Middle East
  18. Southern Lebanon residents
  19. Breaking news Lebanon
  20. Lebanon defiance
  21. Israeli military
  22. Lebanon tragedy

#killed #residents #southern #Lebanon #defy #Israeli #orders #return #home

Pete Hegseth Gives US Troops New Marching Orders Hours After Confirmation


Pete Hegseth ordered America’s troops to “put America first” and “never back down” in a “message to the force” hours after his razor-thin confirmation as Defense Secretary.

In a press release published by the Pentagon on Saturday after his swearing-in ceremony, Hegseth wrote, “The President gave us a clear mission: achieve Peace through Strength. We will do this in three ways—by restoring the warrior ethos, rebuilding our military, and reestablishing deterrence.”

“We are American warriors,” he continued. “We will defend our country. Our standards will be high, uncompromising, and clear. The strength of our military is our unity and our shared purpose.”

“All of this will be done with a focus on lethality, meritocracy, accountability, standards, and readiness,” the former Fox News host and veteran added.

Hegseth, 44, who was among President Donald Trump’s most controversial Cabinet picks, on Friday eked out a successful Senate confirmation by a single tie-breaking vote, cast by Vice President JD Vance.

In addition to questions about whether he had the necessary experience for the position, Hegseth faced blowback over his history of infidelity, an allegation of sexual assault (which he has denied), multiple allegations addressing past struggles with alcohol (which he has also denied), and his past opposition to women in combat roles.

During the confirmation process, Hegseth repeatedly dismissed the slew of news stories that raised questions about his character—including an email reported by The New York Times in which Hegseth’s own mother accused him of abusing “many” women—as a media “smear campaign.”

He also walked back his past criticism of women in the military, saying that “every service member, regardless of gender, who can meet objective occupational and readiness standards for a career field should have the opportunity to compete for jobs in that field.”

As Secretary of Defense, Hegseth will be responsible for overseeing the third-largest and best-funded military in the world.



Just hours after his confirmation as Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth wasted no time in giving US troops new marching orders. In a rousing speech to military personnel, Hegseth emphasized the importance of readiness, discipline, and unwavering dedication to the mission.

“We are facing unprecedented challenges in today’s world, and it is imperative that we are prepared to meet them head-on,” Hegseth declared. “Our enemies will not wait for us to be ready, so we must always be vigilant and ready to act at a moment’s notice.”

Hegseth’s tough talk and no-nonsense approach were met with enthusiastic applause from the troops, who are no doubt eager to follow their new leader into battle. The confirmation of Hegseth as Secretary of Defense has been met with mixed reactions, but his decisive leadership style and commitment to the military are sure to win over even the most skeptical critics.

As the sun sets on another day, US troops stand ready to face whatever challenges lie ahead, knowing that they have a strong and fearless leader in Pete Hegseth. With his new marching orders ringing in their ears, they march forward with confidence and determination, ready to defend their country and uphold the values that make America great.

Tags:

  1. Pete Hegseth
  2. US troops
  3. New marching orders
  4. Confirmation
  5. Military news
  6. National defense
  7. Army updates
  8. Pete Hegseth news
  9. US military
  10. Defense secretary

#Pete #Hegseth #Troops #Marching #Orders #Hours #Confirmation

Rutgers cancels DEI conference following Trump executive orders




In response to recent executive orders signed by former President Donald Trump, Rutgers University has made the decision to cancel its Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) conference. The conference, which was planned to address important issues surrounding diversity and inclusion on campus, was set to take place next month.

The executive orders issued by Trump aimed to prohibit federal agencies, contractors, and grant recipients from conducting certain types of diversity training that the administration deemed “divisive” or “anti-American.” These orders have sparked controversy and concern among universities and organizations across the country, leading Rutgers to reevaluate its plans for the DEI conference.

In a statement released by Rutgers, university officials expressed disappointment in having to cancel the conference, but emphasized the importance of complying with federal guidelines. They also reassured the community that efforts to promote diversity and inclusion on campus would continue through other means.

Despite the cancellation of the DEI conference, Rutgers remains committed to fostering an inclusive and equitable environment for all members of its community. Stay tuned for updates on future initiatives and events aimed at promoting diversity and inclusion on campus.

Tags:

  1. Rutgers DEI conference cancellation
  2. Trump executive orders impact on DEI conference
  3. Rutgers diversity equity and inclusion event cancelled
  4. DEI conference Rutgers news
  5. Rutgers response to Trump executive orders
  6. Rutgers diversity event cancellation reasons
  7. DEI conference Rutgers latest updates
  8. Rutgers DEI event Trump administration influence
  9. Rutgers diversity conference cancellation details
  10. Rutgers DEI conference fallout from Trump orders

#Rutgers #cancels #DEI #conference #Trump #executive #orders

Rutgers cancels HBCU event to align with Trump DEI orders


The Rutgers University Center for Minority Serving Institutions announced Thursday that it has canceled an upcoming virtual conference about registered apprenticeship programs as a result of President Trump’s executive orders targeting diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.

“We were very excited to bring the HBCUs and Registered Apprenticeship Mini-Conference to you next week,” said the email sent to registered attendees. “Unfortunately, due to President Trump’s Executive Orders … we have been asked to cease all work under the auspices of the Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility HUB at Jobs for the Future, which the U.S. Department of Labor funds.”

Jobs for the Future, an organization focused on helping college and workforce leaders create equitable economic outcomes for students, runs a national innovation hub focused on improving access to registered apprenticeships for women, people of color and other underrepresented groups.

Located in New Jersey, a blue state for more the 30 years, Rutgers has not faced pressure from state legislators to dismantle DEI. But the cancellation demonstrates the leverage and power the federal government can hold over colleges and universities by threatening to pull funding from programs that don’t comply with the president’s demands.

It’s just the kind of reaction higher ed policy experts and DEI advocates predicted as a result of the Republican agenda.

“That wariness and sort of pre-emptive compliance, even absent direct threats from the federal or state government, might be somewhat universal,” Brendan Cantwell, a professor of education at Michigan State University, told Inside Higher Ed.

“These leaders will be worried about losing their federal funding, which is exactly what DEI opponents want,” added Shaun Harper, a professor of education, business and public policy; the founder of the University of Southern California’s Race and Equity Center; and an Inside Higher Ed opinion contributor.

More cancellations are anticipated in the weeks and months to come as the Trump administration continues to issue executive orders. For instance, Trump’s growing team at the Department of Education announced a series of actions Thursday related to eliminating DEI.

“The Department removed or archived hundreds of guidance documents, reports, and training materials that include mentions of DEI from its outward facing communication channels [and] put employees charged with leading DEI initiatives on paid administrative leave,” agency officials said in a news release. “These actions are in line with President Trump’s ongoing commitment to end illegal discrimination and wasteful spending across the federal government. They are the first step in reorienting the agency toward prioritizing meaningful learning ahead of divisive ideology in our schools.”

Other actions the department has taken include:

  • Dissolving the department’s Diversity and Inclusion Council.
  • Terminating the Employee Engagement Diversity Equity Inclusion Accessibility Council within the Office for Civil Rights.
  • Canceling ongoing DEI training and service contracts that total over $2.6 million.
  • Withdrawing the department’s Equity Action Plan, which was released in 2023 to align with former president Joe Biden’s executive order to advance racial equity and support for underserved communities.



Recently, Rutgers University made the controversial decision to cancel an event celebrating Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) in order to align with President Trump’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) executive orders.

The event, which was organized by the university’s Black Student Union, was set to highlight the contributions and achievements of HBCUs in higher education. However, Rutgers officials announced that they were forced to cancel the event due to concerns about violating the new DEI guidelines put forth by the Trump administration.

This decision has sparked outrage among students, faculty, and community members who believe that celebrating HBCUs is crucial in promoting diversity and inclusion on campus. Many are calling on Rutgers to reverse their decision and allow the event to proceed as planned.

It remains to be seen how Rutgers will respond to the backlash and whether they will reconsider their decision in light of the criticism. Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story.

Tags:

Rutgers cancels event, HBCU, Trump DEI orders, diversity and inclusion, higher education, Rutgers University, event cancellation, Trump administration, diversity initiatives, HBCU partnership

#Rutgers #cancels #HBCU #event #align #Trump #DEI #orders

Rutgers cancels conference due to Trump’s DEI orders


The Rutgers University Center for Minority Serving Institutions canceled an upcoming conference indirectly funded through the U.S. Department of Labor, in response to President Donald Trump’s orders for federal agencies to cease diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.

It comes as colleges are closely watching a myriad of orders by Trump, including one that would allow U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement agents to take action on college campuses. Another has paused communications from federal health agencies, including the National Institutes of Health, which is responsible for billions in research funding, at least through Feb. 1.

“Unfortunately, due to President Trump’s Executive Orders … we have been asked to cease all work under the auspices of the Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility HUB at Jobs for the Future, which the U.S. Department of Labor funds,” wrote Marybeth Gasman, executive director of the Rutgers center in an email this week to registered participants of the conference on apprenticeship programs.

» READ MORE: ICE has been freed to make arrests at churches. More immigrants took sanctuary in Philadelphia than anywhere else.

The minority serving center wasn’t the only entity impacted at Rutgers. President Jonathan Holloway in a message to Rutgers leaders Friday noted that several offices had reported receiving stop-work orders for federal grant-funded activities involving diversity, equity and inclusion.

Jobs for the Future, which was funding the conference through a $13 million grant, is a nonprofit that works with education and workforce entities to create equitable economic outcomes. Every partner on that grant ― which came through the nonprofit’s diversity, equity and inclusion hub that is funded by the federal labor department ― was told they had to stop that work, Gasman said in an interview. The grant was scheduled to end in June.

Nearly 100 registrants were scheduled to attend the event next week for historically Black colleges to learn more about paid apprenticeship programs from those that already take part in them, she said. Gasman emphasized that the cancellation had nothing to do with it being an HBCU event, but because of the funding source.

When the grant started, she said there were only two HBCUs doing apprenticeship programs, which are especially helpful for students from low-income families to learn and get paid; now there are 21.

Some have questioned why she canceled the event, she said, but without the funding and none of the staff from Jobs for the Future or its partners able to participate, she would have had to find new staff to participate in a short time.

Holloway in his message to the campus community said, “Know we remain committed to building an inclusive community.”

‘Watching in real time’

While the conference cancellation is one example of a concrete action taken in response to a Trump initiative, some higher education officials said it was too early to adequately gauge the impact of the executive orders.

“We are watching in real time as the new administration is putting policies in place,” Kate Shaw, executive director of the Pennsylvania State Board of Higher Education, told the board at its meeting Thursday. “I think it’s a little too early to know exactly what the parameters of those policy changes are going to look like.”

Jonathan A. Epstein, interim executive vice president of the University of Pennsylvania Health System and dean of the Perelman School of Medicine, acknowledged the anxiety among researchers after Trump announced a pause on communication with federal health agencies, including the National Institutes of Health.

NIH provides about $40 billion in funding to 300,000 scientists at about 2,500 universities and research institutions nationwide, according to the Chronicle of Higher Education.

“Please know that we are working with our academic and government relations colleagues to understand and respond to the potential impact of these events,” Epstein wrote in an email obtained by The Inquirer. “We are working closely with your department chairs and institute/center directors, and we remain focused on our strategic priorities.”

The university, he noted, had adapted before “when new information arrived frequently, but the implications for the future were hard to predict,” citing the early days of the pandemic.

“We are tracking events closely and will continue to share information as it becomes available,” he wrote.

Rutgers in a statement said it also was monitoring the pause on meetings, communications and travel at NIH and would provide guidance to faculty and staff as the university learned more.

In an email to faculty and staff, Drexel University said the changes could potentially affect both those projects already awarded and those awaiting funding, but did not recommend stopping research without consulting with the school’s Office of Research & Innovation.

“We are closely monitoring this dynamic situation,” the email said.

The concern among faculty is palpable.

“There’s an extraordinarily high degree of uncertainty in areas where there has been certainty,” said Eric Feldman, chair of Penn’s faculty senate and a law professor, “ … which has led recipients of federal funding to be unsure both of whether or not they will be able to continue their work as funded and has left grantees uncertain as to whether their proposals will be reviewed in a timely and objective manner.”

In addition, potential ICE agent action at colleges has generated discussion on campuses, though it’s unclear what colleges, which are home to some undocumented students, could do.

“Colleges and universities are not immune to federal law, and there are not many options when law enforcement shows up with a warrant,” said one local higher education official, who asked not to be named because of the sensitivity of the topic.

Temple University said it has in the past, at least since 2009, been visited by ICE under the Administrative Site Visit and Verification Program.

“We have a protocol in place for handling such visits,” said spokesperson Steve Orbanek. “We expect that we would follow the same or a similar protocol if ICE chooses to come to Temple under other programs.”

The university, he said, follows Temple’s visitor’s policy and coordinates visits with appropriate offices. That covers visitors who come to conduct business at the university.

At Rutgers, Holloway said in his message that the school has received no notice that ICE would be on campus, but doesn’t expect that it would. The university, he said, will not share student records unless required by law, and Rutgers’ police department doesn’t ask or document the immigration status of students unless a serious crime occurs.

“Rutgers is committed to ensuring that any federal enforcement actions on campus adhere to due process, including the requirement of a warrant when necessary,” Holloway said.



Rutgers University Cancels Conference in Response to Trump’s DEI Orders

In a bold move, Rutgers University has decided to cancel an upcoming conference on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) following recent orders from the Trump administration. The conference, which was set to address crucial issues surrounding diversity and inclusivity in higher education, has been called off in response to new directives that threaten to undermine progress in these areas.

The university released a statement explaining their decision, citing concerns about the potential impact of the Trump administration’s orders on their ability to effectively address DEI issues. Rutgers officials expressed disappointment that they were forced to cancel the conference, but emphasized that they must prioritize the well-being and rights of their students and faculty in the face of these new challenges.

The cancellation of the conference serves as a powerful statement of defiance against the Trump administration’s attempts to roll back progress in promoting diversity and inclusivity on college campuses. Rutgers is taking a stand in support of the principles of DEI, and their decision to cancel the conference is a testament to their commitment to creating a more equitable and inclusive campus community.

As debates over DEI policies continue to unfold at the national level, Rutgers’ bold move to cancel their conference sends a clear message that they will not back down in the face of threats to diversity and inclusivity. The university’s actions serve as a reminder of the importance of upholding these values in higher education, and their decision to cancel the conference is a powerful act of resistance against attempts to undermine progress in this crucial area.

Tags:

  1. Rutgers conference cancellation
  2. Trump DEI orders impact
  3. Rutgers event cancellation news
  4. Diversity, equity, and inclusion orders by Trump
  5. Rutgers response to Trump’s DEI policies
  6. Impact of Trump’s DEI orders on Rutgers conference
  7. Rutgers DEI conference cancellation
  8. Trump administration’s effect on Rutgers event
  9. Rutgers conference called off due to DEI orders
  10. Rutgers and Trump’s diversity, equity, and inclusion policies

#Rutgers #cancels #conference #due #Trumps #DEI #orders

Rutgers cancels DEI conference after Trump executive orders, drawing ire of NJ politicians


Rutgers University has drawn the ire of New Jersey politicians for cancelling a scheduled Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) conference following President Donald Trump’s executive orders on DEI this week.

“We have been asked to cease all work under the auspices of the Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility HUB at Jobs for the Future, which the U.S. Department of Labor funds,” Rutgers said on Thursday in an email to registered attendees for the canceled Jan. 30 “HBCUs and Registered Apprenticeship Mini-Conference.”

Newark Mayor Ras Baraka and Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop, both Democratic candidates for governor, took to X, formerly Twitter, on Saturday to denounce the university’s decision.

“Rutgers, and any other schools preemptively pulling DEI programming, is an utter failure of courage in the face of political foolishness,” Baraka posted. “Diversity, equity, and inclusion are not just buzzwords — they are proven strategies that make our workplaces more productive, our students more learned, and our economy stronger and more stable.”

Baraka calling Trump a “bully,” wrote: “I call on all private sector partners, responsible corporations, and those who believe in democracy to stand with our institutions against the threat of defunding.”

Fulop agreed with his fellow Democrat posting “now is no time to cower to bullies.”

Story continues below photo gallery

He was also critical of the university’s leadership, writing: “Rutgers as an institution has fostered a bully culture for a few years now. One that targets employees with institutional knowledge and memory, which does a disservice to the students. Look no further than the most recent additions to the Board as where the worst of NJ politics and higher education intertwine…”

He pledged that if elected governor: “I will end the university’s bend toward corporate interests and machine favors, and I will nominate retired professors and staff to serve as members of the Board of Governors.”

Others were also critical of Rutgers’ decision to cancel the conference.

“The capitulation continues. These ill-conceived moves are pushing American higher education backwards. We must fight back,” the American Association of University Professors posted.

Trump DEI executive orders

Trump signed two executive orders this week relating to DEI.

On Monday, he signed “Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing,” which among other things called for the government to terminate “all discriminatory programs, including illegal DEI and “diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility” (DEIA) mandates, policies, programs, preferences, and activities in the Federal Government.”

On Tuesday, Trump issued “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity,” which claims that the “Federal Government, major corporations, financial institutions, the medical industry, large commercial airlines, law enforcement agencies, and institutions of higher education have adopted and actively use dangerous, demeaning, and immoral race- and sex-based preferences under the guise of so-called “diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI) or “diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility” (DEIA) that can violate the civil-rights laws of this Nation.”

The order calls on “all executive departments and agencies to terminate all discriminatory and illegal preferences, mandates, policies, programs, activities, guidance, regulations, enforcement actions, consent orders, and requirements.”

This article originally appeared on NorthJersey.com: Rutgers cancels DEI conference following Trump executive orders



Rutgers University’s decision to cancel its Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) conference following President Trump’s recent executive orders has sparked controversy and criticism from New Jersey politicians.

The university announced the cancellation of the conference, which was set to address issues of racial equality and social justice, citing concerns over potential legal implications of the executive orders. The orders, which target diversity training programs that address systemic racism and sexism, have been met with backlash from civil rights groups and activists.

New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy, along with several state lawmakers, have condemned Rutgers’ decision to cancel the conference, arguing that it is a violation of free speech and academic freedom. In a statement, Governor Murphy said, “Rutgers’ decision to cancel the DEI conference is a troubling example of the chilling effect that these executive orders are having on institutions of higher education.”

State Senator Teresa Ruiz echoed these sentiments, stating, “Rutgers should be a place where diverse perspectives are welcomed and celebrated, not silenced. This decision sends a dangerous message to students, faculty, and the community at large.”

The controversy surrounding Rutgers’ cancellation of the DEI conference highlights the ongoing debate over the role of diversity and inclusion efforts in higher education and society at large. As the university faces criticism from politicians and advocates, it remains to be seen how this decision will impact its reputation and commitment to promoting social justice and equality.

Tags:

Rutgers DEI conference, Trump executive orders, NJ politicians, diversity conference cancellation, Rutgers controversy, DEI event cancellation, political backlash, Trump administration impact, social justice conference, racial equality, diversity and inclusion, political response, Rutgers University news.

#Rutgers #cancels #DEI #conference #Trump #executive #orders #drawing #ire #politicians