Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: Ousting
Trump advisers have discussed ousting independent watchdogs at several federal agencies: Sources
President Donald Trump’s top advisers have discussed ousting independent watchdogs — known as inspectors general — at multiple federal agencies, sources familiar with the conversations tell ABC News.
The conversations began during Trump’s transition period to the White House, but sources tell ABC News that it’s not clear if or when the moves are expected to occur.
A decision on whether or not to fire the IGs has not been made, and it’s not clear how many of the watchdogs Trump would seek to remove, the sources said.
Inspectors general can be fired by the president, but only after communicating a reason for the removal to both houses of Congress 30 days in advance. In 2022, Congress strengthened and expanded protections for inspectors general, making it harder to replace them with hand-picked officials and requiring additional explanations from a president for their removal.
While the politically-appointed leaders of agencies and departments come and go with each administration, an IG can stay and serve under multiple presidents.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment.
“It would essentially be removing this critical component of oversight and it really leaves the American public vulnerable to corruption and abuse of power,” Faith Williams, the director of the Effective and Accountable Government Program at the Project on Government Oversight watchdog group, told ABC News.
Trump installed political loyalists after firing multiple inspectors general during his first term in office — including five over six weeks in 2020 — in a move that was criticized by lawmakers and government watchdogs who accused Trump of attempting to erode safeguards and independent checks on the federal government.
President Donald Trump takes a question from a reporter during a news conference in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on Jan. 21, 2025 in Washington, D.C.
Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
In April of 2020, Trump fired Michael Atkinson, the inspector general for the intelligence community, telling reporters he did a “terrible job.”
Atkinson’s communications to Congress about a whistleblower complaint helped initiate the Ukraine impeachment inquiry against Trump, leading to his first impeachment by Congress. Trump was ultimately acquitted by the Senate.
“I thought he did a terrible job, absolutely terrible. He took a whistleblower report which turned out to be a fake report, it was fake, it was totally wrong. It was about my conversation with the president of Ukraine,” Trump said. “He took a fake report, and he brought it to Congress.”
Atkinson transmitted an intelligence official’s complaint to Congress that centered on Trump’s phone call urging Ukraine’s president to investigate the Biden family’s dealings in Ukraine. Democrats later impeached Trump for abusing his power in efforts to get Ukraine to investigate his political rival, and for obstructing the congressional investigation into the affair.
Trump said he fired State Department inspector general Steve Linick at the urging of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo — who was being investigated by the office.
“I don’t know anything about him, other than the State Department, or Mike in particular, weren’t happy with the job he was doing,” Trump said. “He asked me if that would be possible, and I said, ‘Sure, I’ll do that.’”
Earlier this year, President Joe Biden fired the inspector general of the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board, Martin Dickman, following an investigation into workplace harassment and abuse, according to The Hill.
And President Barack Obama fired Gerald Walpin, the inspector general of the Corporation for National Community Service, in 2009. It followed Walpin’s criticism of a Justice Department settlement with then-Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson, who had been accused by his investigators of using AmeriCorps volunteers as chaffeurs and personal assistants. Johnson, a Democrat, had campaigned for Obama.
Since 1978, inspectors general have been tasked with investigating waste, fraud and abuse across departments and agencies. Nearly half of the 74 inspectors general in the federal government are nominated by presidents to serve in nonpartisan roles.
By law, an inspector general must be hired “without regard to political party and solely on the basis of integrity and demonstrated ability in accounting, auditing, financial analysis, law, management analysis, public administration, or investigations.”
Currently, there are nearly a dozen vacant inspector general positions for Trump to fill, including at the Treasury and Commerce Departments and the National Security Agency.
The inspectors general of the Central Intelligence Agency and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence resigned late last year, giving Trump the opportunity to nominate his own picks to lead oversight of the powerful national security agencies.
While an inspector general lacks prosecutorial power, IGs can identify possible criminal behavior and refer it for prosecution.
In 2021, the State Department IG determined that Pompeo and his wife broke ethics rules by asking staff to carry out personal favors. Pompeo defended his actions, arguing that they asked “small, simple” tasks of a “friend” who was a longtime aide.
In the past, Trump has defended the president’s authority to remove inspectors general — but the move could prompt political backlash.
In his first day in office, President Ronald Reagan dismissed more than a dozen inspectors general, and was accused by Republicans and Democrats of politicizing the roles, according to The New York Times.
The outcry led Reagan to hire some of the ousted watchdogs back into their roles, Williams of the Project on Government Oversight told ABC News.
“I would hope that there would be some outcry now” if Trump were to take action, Williams said. “One of Congress’s duties is oversight, and one of the ways it achieves that is by working with the inspector general community.”
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, a longtime advocate for inspectors general, told ABC News that IGs are “very important” to support Congress’ work as a check on the executive branch.
“Inspector generals are expected to be independent of political pressure, independent of the head of the agency, and to make sure the law is enforced and money is spent appropriately,” he said.
Trump’s first transition team also contemplated removing inspectors general: In 2017, the House Oversight Committee obtained an internal transition team email with instructions to inform IGs they were “being held over on a temporary basis.”
As president, Trump repeatedly complained about inspectors general and their work — once calling it “insane” that the Pentagon IG’s reports were publicly released.
“For these reports to be, to be given out, essentially — forget about the public — given out to the enemy is insane. And I don’t want it to happen anymore, Mr. Secretary. You understand that,” he said in a January 2019 Cabinet meeting to his then-acting Defense secretary, Patrick Shanahan.
ABC News’ Lalee Ibssa contributed to this report.
The Trump administration has reportedly been discussing the possibility of removing independent watchdogs at several federal agencies, according to sources familiar with the matter.This move is raising concerns among critics who fear that it could undermine the oversight and accountability mechanisms in place to prevent corruption and misconduct within the government.
The discussions have reportedly centered around the idea of replacing these watchdogs with individuals who are more aligned with the administration’s agenda, potentially compromising their independence and impartiality.
Critics argue that removing independent watchdogs could have far-reaching consequences for transparency and accountability in government operations, allowing for unchecked abuse of power and corruption.
It remains to be seen whether these discussions will lead to any concrete actions, but the mere fact that they are taking place has raised alarm bells among those who value the importance of independent oversight in ensuring good governance.
Tags:
Trump advisers, independent watchdogs, federal agencies, ousting, discussions, sources, government oversight, political news, Trump administration, inspector general, accountability
#Trump #advisers #discussed #ousting #independent #watchdogs #federal #agencies #SourcesReacting to Trent Baalke’s Ousting as GM
In today’s episode, we go over the Jacksonville Jaguars parting ways with general manager Trent Baalke.
Jaguars owner Shad Khan and general manager Trent Baalke spoke earlier this month. Below is a partial transcript.
Q: On Khan’s response to candidates potentially having reservations about having a general
manager already in place?Khan: “What do you mean by clean slate? If so, that’s the definition of a clean slate? What we want to do is for them to have an environment where they’re going to be successful. They say, ‘I want my own quarterback, I want my own health and wellness, I want my own doctors.’ It’s like, you do that, unless they have identified—somebody wants to say that, I would want to really go through that in depth. Because if we can get better, if they have a better doctor… [Head Physician] Kevin Kaplan is among the top two or three best doctors in the NFL, for example. Same thing, a lot of things we’re doing, I’d want to listen to them and get better. If they have reservations, I would want to address them honestly and openly, because our goal is they need to be successful. What do we have to give them to be successful? Fear, preconceived notions, whatever, that really can inhibit the right performance. But if they need something, I mean, obviously, we want to listen and we want to improve. I know we can improve.”
Q: On if Khan expects the Jaguars’ turnaround to be brief?
Khan: “I think so. If our defense would improve, get to the middle of the pack, we were what, 2-10 this year [in one-score games]? How many of those games we could win? I think the schemes on offense just being less predictable. I think we could be more productive on offense. We have the ability through the Draft coming up and salary cap to be able to use that to get more specific players we were seeking. I expect for us to have success very quickly.”
Q: On what the interview timeline to fulfill coaching vacancy will be and if Baalke expects to put in interview requests today?
Baalke: “I think the short answer to that is yes. We’re going to move quickly to get some people lined up to talk to. How long that process takes? I think Shad mentioned, it’s going to take as long as it takes to identify the right individual. Is that one interview, is that two interviews? I think we’re going to do our due diligence and be very thorough in this process.”
Q: On if the new head coach wanted to restructure the front office?
Khan: “My response would be how would you improve it and then if it is credible, you want to do it. How does the structure work? I want to make sure that this isn’t about ego or power or something more sinister quite frankly. There have been some of those elements that I have found in my experience in the NFL. If it’s a legit effort to get better, then everything should be on the table.”
Ensure you follow on X (Twitter) @JaguarsOnSI and @_John_Shipley and never miss another breaking news story again.
Please let us know your thoughts when you like our Facebook page WHEN YOU CLICK RIGHT HERE.
As a die-hard fan of the Jacksonville Jaguars, I have been eagerly following the news surrounding the decision to oust Trent Baalke as the team’s general manager. While some may see this move as a necessary step in the right direction for the franchise, others may be questioning the timing and impact it will have on the team moving forward.Baalke’s tenure with the Jaguars has been met with mixed reviews, with many fans and analysts criticizing his handling of the roster and draft selections. His track record with the San Francisco 49ers, where he served as general manager from 2011 to 2016, also raised concerns among Jaguars faithful.
However, it is important to acknowledge the challenges Baalke faced during his time with the Jaguars, including the tumultuous coaching changes and struggles on the field. As a fan, I can’t help but feel a sense of disappointment that things didn’t work out for Baalke in Jacksonville.
Moving forward, it will be interesting to see who the Jaguars bring in as their new general manager and how they plan to address the issues that have plagued the team in recent years. As always, I will continue to support the Jaguars and hope for a brighter future ahead. #DUUUVAL
Tags:
- Trent Baalke GM
- Ousting of Trent Baalke
- San Francisco 49ers GM
- NFL front office news
- Trent Baalke firing reaction
- 49ers management changes
- NFL General Manager updates
- Baalke dismissal analysis
- Impact of Baalke departure
- 49ers front office shakeup
#Reacting #Trent #Baalkes #Ousting