Tag: Ownership

  • Panama’s president says there will be no negotiation about ownership of canal


    PANAMA CITY — Panama President José Raúl Mulino said Thursday there will be no negotiation with the United States over ownership of the Panama Canal, and he hopes U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s upcoming visit will allow them to focus on shared interests including migration and combating drug trafficking.

    Being the destination for the first overseas visit by the top U.S. diplomat would have been big for Panama in any case, but Rubio comes as the emissary of U.S. President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly suggested the U.S. retake the Panama Canal.

    On the day of his inauguration, Trump claimed that U.S. ships were being “severely overcharged and not treated fairly in any way, shape or form,” noting that “above all, China is operating the Panama Canal.” He had previously said the U.S. could demand the canal be returned.

    Mulino tried to downplay the tension at his weekly press conference Thursday. He spoke of wanting to clarify confusion about China’s role in the canal — a Hong Kong consortium manages ports at both ends, but Panama controls the canal – and blamed a predecessor for the long-term concession made for control of the ports.

    “It’s impossible, I can’t negotiate,” Mulino said when asked about returning the canal to U.S. control. “That is done. The canal belongs to Panama.”

    The United States built the canal in the early 1900s as it looked for ways to facilitate the transit of commercial and military vessels between its coasts. Washington relinquished control of the waterway to Panama on Dec. 31, 1999, under a treaty signed in 1977 by President Jimmy Carter.

    “The only thing that I want is to clear all the garbage from the path, clean the table and be able to speak with the United States and very frankly” about issues including immigration, security and the fight against drug trafficking, Mulino said.

    Rubio is scheduled to meet with Mulino Sunday and visit the canal.

    ____

    Follow AP’s coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at https://apnews.com/hub/latin-america



    Panama’s president, Laurentino Cortizo, has made it clear that there will be no negotiation about the ownership of the Panama Canal. In a recent statement, Cortizo emphasized that the canal is a national asset and a source of pride for the Panamanian people.

    The Panama Canal, a key waterway that connects the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, has been under Panamanian control since the United States handed over ownership in 1999. The canal plays a crucial role in global trade, allowing ships to avoid the long and treacherous journey around the southern tip of South America.

    Cortizo’s firm stance on the ownership of the canal comes amidst speculation about potential foreign interests seeking to gain control of the strategic waterway. However, the president has assured the public that the canal will remain under Panamanian sovereignty and that there will be no negotiations regarding its ownership.

    As Panama continues to assert its control over the canal and its surrounding infrastructure, it is clear that the country is committed to safeguarding this vital asset for generations to come.

    Tags:

    Panama Canal ownership, Panama president statement, Canal negotiation, Panama Canal sovereignty, Panama Canal history, Panama Canal ownership dispute, Panama Canal negotiations, Panama Canal politics, Panama Canal news

    #Panamas #president #negotiation #ownership #canal

  • Panama’s president says there will be no negotiation about ownership of canal


    PANAMA CITY (AP) — Panama President José Raúl Mulino said Thursday there will be no negotiation with the United States over ownership of the Panama Canal, and he hopes U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s upcoming visit will allow them to focus on shared interests including migration and combating drug trafficking.

    Being the destination for the first overseas visit by the top U.S. diplomat would have been big for Panama in any case, but Rubio comes as the emissary of U.S. President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly suggested the U.S. retake the Panama Canal.

    On the day of his inauguration, Trump claimed that U.S. ships were being “severely overcharged and not treated fairly in any way, shape or form,” noting that “above all, China is operating the Panama Canal.” He had previously said the U.S. could demand the canal be returned.

    Mulino tried to downplay the tension at his weekly press conference Thursday. He spoke of wanting to clarify confusion about China’s role in the canal — a Hong Kong consortium manages ports at both ends, but Panama controls the canal – and blamed a predecessor for establishing diplomatic relations with China.

    “It’s impossible, I can’t negotiate,” Mulino said when asked about returning the canal to U.S. control. “That is done. The canal belongs to Panama.”

    The United States built the canal in the early 1900s as it looked for ways to facilitate the transit of commercial and military vessels between its coasts. Washington relinquished control of the waterway to Panama on Dec. 31, 1999, under a treaty signed in 1977 by President Jimmy Carter.

    “The only thing that I want is to clear all the garbage from the path, clean the table and be able to speak with the United States and very frankly” about issues including immigration, security and the fight against drug trafficking, Mulino said.

    Rubio is scheduled to meet with Mulino Sunday and visit the canal.

    ____

    Follow AP’s coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at https://apnews.com/hub/latin-america





    In a recent statement, Panama’s President made it clear that there will be no negotiation about the ownership of the Panama Canal. The iconic waterway, which connects the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, has been under Panamanian control since the 1999 transfer from the United States.

    The President emphasized that the Panama Canal is a vital national asset and a source of pride for the country. He stated that the canal’s ownership is not up for discussion and that Panama will continue to manage and operate the waterway in the best interest of its citizens.

    This announcement comes amidst growing concerns about the strategic importance of the Panama Canal and its role in global trade. As one of the busiest and most important waterways in the world, the Panama Canal plays a crucial role in facilitating the movement of goods between the East and West.

    With this firm stance on ownership, Panama is sending a clear message to the international community that the canal is a non-negotiable piece of its national identity and sovereignty. The President’s statement underscores Panama’s commitment to protecting its interests and ensuring the continued success of the Panama Canal for years to come.

    Tags:

    Panama, President, ownership, canal, negotiation, Panama Canal, Central America, infrastructure, international relations, sovereignty, waterway.

    #Panamas #president #negotiation #ownership #canal

  • City and water utility battle over ownership, rates




    In a recent development, the city and the local water utility have found themselves at odds over ownership and rates. The city claims that the water utility is overcharging residents for water services and is not providing adequate maintenance of the water infrastructure. On the other hand, the water utility argues that they have the right to set their own rates and manage their operations independently.

    This conflict has escalated to the point where the city is considering taking legal action to assert its control over the water utility. The city believes that as a public entity, it should have oversight and control over such essential services to ensure the well-being of its residents.

    The water utility, on the other hand, argues that they have invested heavily in upgrading and maintaining the water infrastructure and that any interference from the city would jeopardize the quality of service provided to customers.

    As the battle between the city and the water utility continues to escalate, residents are caught in the middle, unsure of who to support. It is clear that a resolution must be reached to ensure that residents have access to affordable and reliable water services while also maintaining the integrity of the water utility. Only time will tell how this conflict will be resolved and what implications it may have for the future of water services in the city.

    Tags:

    1. City vs water utility
    2. Ownership dispute
    3. Water rates controversy
    4. Municipal water issues
    5. Legal battles over utilities
    6. Public vs private water services
    7. Utility rate disputes
    8. Municipal water ownership
    9. City government vs water company
    10. Water service conflicts

    #City #water #utility #battle #ownership #rates

  • The Chicago Bears’ Ownership Situation: Will the McCaskeys Sell?

    The Chicago Bears’ Ownership Situation: Will the McCaskeys Sell?


    The Chicago Bears have been a staple in the NFL for over a century, but in recent years, the team’s ownership situation has been a topic of much speculation. The team is currently owned by the McCaskey family, who have been in control since the team’s inception in 1920. However, with the passing of longtime owner Virginia McCaskey’s husband, Ed McCaskey, in 2003, there has been uncertainty surrounding the future of ownership.

    Many fans and analysts have questioned whether the McCaskeys will sell the team, especially as the NFL continues to see an influx of new, wealthy owners who are willing to spend big on their franchises. However, the McCaskey family has remained steadfast in their commitment to the Bears, with Virginia McCaskey stating that the team will remain in the family for generations to come.

    Despite this assurance, there are still concerns about the team’s performance under the McCaskey’s ownership. The Bears have had their fair share of struggles on the field in recent years, with inconsistency at the quarterback position and a lack of playoff success. This has led some fans to call for a change in ownership, believing that new leadership could help turn the team’s fortunes around.

    In addition to the performance on the field, there have also been questions about the team’s stadium situation. The Bears currently play at Soldier Field, which is owned by the Chicago Park District. The team has explored the possibility of building a new stadium in the suburbs, but this has been met with resistance from city officials and fans who want the team to remain in Chicago.

    Overall, the future of the Chicago Bears’ ownership remains uncertain. While the McCaskey family has expressed their desire to keep the team in their hands, the pressure to sell or make changes continues to mount. Only time will tell what the future holds for one of the NFL’s most historic franchises.


    #Chicago #Bears #Ownership #Situation #McCaskeys #Sell,will the mccaskeys sell the bears

  • The Chicago Bears’ Ownership Future: Will the McCaskeys Stay or Sell?

    The Chicago Bears’ Ownership Future: Will the McCaskeys Stay or Sell?


    The Chicago Bears have been a staple in the city for over a century, with a rich history and loyal fan base. However, the future of the team’s ownership is a topic of much speculation and debate.

    The team is currently owned by the McCaskey family, who have been at the helm since 1920 when George Halas, one of the team’s founders, purchased the team. The McCaskeys have kept the team in the family ever since, with George’s grandson, George McCaskey, currently serving as the team’s chairman.

    Despite their long-standing ownership, there has been growing speculation that the McCaskeys may be considering selling the team. Some believe that the family may be looking to cash in on the team’s value, which has skyrocketed in recent years due to the NFL’s immense popularity and lucrative television deals.

    There have also been rumors that the McCaskeys may be looking to sell the team due to internal family disputes and disagreements over the team’s direction. Some family members may be looking to cash out and move on, while others may be more committed to keeping the team in the family.

    On the other hand, there are those who believe that the McCaskeys will continue to hold onto the team for generations to come. The family has a deep emotional attachment to the Bears and may be reluctant to part ways with the team, regardless of financial incentives.

    Ultimately, the decision of whether the McCaskeys will stay or sell the team remains to be seen. The family has not made any public statements regarding their intentions, leaving fans and analysts to speculate on the team’s future.

    Regardless of what the future holds, one thing is certain: the Chicago Bears will always hold a special place in the hearts of their loyal fan base, no matter who owns the team. Whether the McCaskeys stay or sell, the Bears will continue to be a proud and storied franchise in the NFL.


    #Chicago #Bears #Ownership #Future #McCaskeys #Stay #Sell,will the mccaskeys sell the bears

  • The McCaskey Family and the Chicago Bears: Will Ownership Stay or Go?

    The McCaskey Family and the Chicago Bears: Will Ownership Stay or Go?


    The McCaskey family has been synonymous with the Chicago Bears for nearly a century. Since the team’s founding in 1919, the McCaskey family has owned and operated the franchise, making them one of the longest-tenured ownership groups in the NFL. However, as the team continues to struggle on the field, questions have arisen about the future of the McCaskey family’s ownership of the team.

    The McCaskey family’s ties to the Bears run deep. The team was originally founded by George Halas, who married into the McCaskey family in 1920. Halas’ daughter, Virginia McCaskey, took over ownership of the team following his death in 1983. Since then, the team has remained in the hands of the McCaskey family, with Virginia’s children and grandchildren playing key roles in the team’s operations.

    Despite their long history with the team, the McCaskey family has faced criticism in recent years for the team’s lack of success on the field. The Bears have struggled to find consistent success in the NFL, with only one Super Bowl win in the team’s history. Fans have grown frustrated with the team’s performance and have called for changes in ownership.

    In response to the criticism, the McCaskey family has made efforts to improve the team’s performance. In recent years, the team has made changes to its coaching staff and front office in an effort to turn things around. However, the team’s struggles have continued, leading some to question whether the McCaskey family is the right group to lead the team into the future.

    Despite the criticism, there are also those who believe that the McCaskey family’s long history with the team is a valuable asset. The family’s commitment to the team and the city of Chicago is well-known, and many fans appreciate the team’s longstanding ties to the community. Some argue that a change in ownership could disrupt the team’s tradition and history, and that the McCaskey family should be given more time to turn things around.

    Ultimately, the question of whether the McCaskey family will stay or go as owners of the Chicago Bears remains unanswered. The family’s ties to the team run deep, but the team’s struggles on the field have raised concerns about the family’s ability to lead the team to success. As the team continues to navigate its future, only time will tell what lies ahead for the McCaskey family and the Chicago Bears.


    #McCaskey #Family #Chicago #Bears #Ownership #Stay,will the mccaskeys sell the bears

  • The McCaskey Family and the Chicago Bears: Will Ownership Change Hands?

    The McCaskey Family and the Chicago Bears: Will Ownership Change Hands?


    The McCaskey family has been synonymous with the Chicago Bears for almost a century. Since 1921, when George Halas became one of the founders of the National Football League and established the team as the Decatur Staleys before moving them to Chicago and renaming them the Bears, the McCaskey family has been at the helm of the organization.

    Over the years, the McCaskey family has seen many highs and lows with the Bears, from winning multiple championships in the 1940s and 1980s to enduring years of mediocrity and disappointment. Through it all, the family has remained committed to the team and its fans, striving to uphold the tradition and legacy of one of the NFL’s most storied franchises.

    However, as time marches on, questions have arisen about whether ownership of the Bears will eventually change hands. The current chairman of the team, George McCaskey, is the grandson of George Halas and has been involved with the organization for many years. While there have been no indications that a change in ownership is imminent, speculation has been swirling about what the future holds for the McCaskey family and the Bears.

    One of the main reasons for the speculation is the fact that the McCaskey family is a large one, with many members potentially having a stake in the team. This can sometimes lead to disagreements and power struggles within the family, which could ultimately impact the future ownership of the Bears.

    Another factor to consider is the changing landscape of the NFL. With the league becoming more and more of a business, there is a growing trend of teams being sold to wealthy owners who may not have the same emotional attachment or history with the team as the McCaskey family does. This could potentially open the door for a change in ownership of the Bears in the future.

    Ultimately, only time will tell what the future holds for the McCaskey family and the Chicago Bears. While the family has shown a deep commitment to the team and its fans over the years, the realities of the modern NFL and the dynamics of a large family ownership group could lead to changes down the road. Whether ownership of the Bears remains in the hands of the McCaskey family or passes to new owners, one thing is certain – the legacy of George Halas and the tradition of the Chicago Bears will continue to endure.


    #McCaskey #Family #Chicago #Bears #Ownership #Change #Hands,will the mccaskeys sell the bears

  • The Service Consultant: Principles of Service Management and Ownership – GOOD

    The Service Consultant: Principles of Service Management and Ownership – GOOD



    The Service Consultant: Principles of Service Management and Ownership – GOOD

    Price : 47.64

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    The role of a service consultant is crucial in ensuring that customers receive the highest level of service possible. Service consultants are responsible for managing customer interactions, resolving issues, and ensuring that customers are satisfied with their experience.

    One of the key principles of service management is taking ownership of the customer’s issue. This means that service consultants should take responsibility for ensuring that the customer’s needs are met and that any problems are resolved in a timely and efficient manner. By taking ownership of the issue, service consultants can demonstrate their commitment to providing excellent service and building trust with the customer.

    Another important principle of service management is prioritizing the customer’s needs. Service consultants should always put the customer first, ensuring that their needs are met and that they are satisfied with the service they receive. This may involve going above and beyond to ensure that the customer’s expectations are exceeded and that they have a positive experience.

    Overall, service consultants play a critical role in ensuring that customers receive the highest level of service possible. By following these principles of service management and ownership, service consultants can build strong relationships with customers, increase customer satisfaction, and ultimately drive business success.
    #Service #Consultant #Principles #Service #Management #Ownership #GOOD, Managed Services

  • Rigor Redefined: Ten Teaching Habits for Surface, Deep, and Transfer Learning (Enables students to take ownership of their learning process)

    Rigor Redefined: Ten Teaching Habits for Surface, Deep, and Transfer Learning (Enables students to take ownership of their learning process)


    Price: $40.95 – $34.05
    (as of Dec 24,2024 07:04:16 UTC – Details)


    From the brand

    Solution Tree Brand Story soulution tree press professional development books teacher books teaching

    Solution Tree Brand Story soulution tree press professional development books teacher books teaching

    solution tree brand story, teacher student,professional development books, student achievement

    solution tree brand story, teacher student,professional development books, student achievement

    New from Solution Tree

    New Art & Science of Teaching

    Publisher ‏ : ‎ Solution Tree Press (August 20, 2024)
    Language ‏ : ‎ English
    Perfect Paperback ‏ : ‎ 248 pages
    ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 1960574663
    ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1960574664
    Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.35 pounds


    Rigor Redefined: Ten Teaching Habits for Surface, Deep, and Transfer Learning (Enables students to take ownership of their learning process)

    As educators, it is our responsibility to ensure that our students not only acquire knowledge but also understand how to apply it in various contexts. This requires a shift in our teaching practices towards fostering surface, deep, and transfer learning. By implementing the following ten teaching habits, we can empower our students to take ownership of their learning process and become lifelong learners:

    1. Set clear learning goals: Clearly defined learning objectives help students understand what is expected of them and provide a roadmap for their learning journey.

    2. Encourage active engagement: Engage students in meaningful activities that require them to think critically, analyze information, and apply concepts in real-world scenarios.

    3. Provide constructive feedback: Offer timely and specific feedback that helps students understand their strengths and areas for improvement.

    4. Foster collaboration: Encourage students to work together, share ideas, and learn from each other through group projects and discussions.

    5. Cultivate curiosity: Spark students’ curiosity by posing thought-provoking questions, encouraging them to explore new ideas, and seek answers independently.

    6. Promote reflection: Encourage students to reflect on their learning experiences, identify their learning preferences, and set goals for improvement.

    7. Use a variety of assessment strategies: Employ a mix of formative and summative assessments that evaluate students’ understanding at different levels of learning.

    8. Emphasize real-world connections: Help students see the relevance of what they are learning by making connections to their lives, future careers, and societal issues.

    9. Provide opportunities for self-directed learning: Encourage students to take initiative in their learning process, set their own goals, and seek resources independently.

    10. Cultivate a growth mindset: Instill in students the belief that their abilities can be developed through effort and perseverance, and that failure is a natural part of the learning process.

    By incorporating these teaching habits into our classrooms, we can create a learning environment that promotes surface, deep, and transfer learning, and empowers students to take ownership of their learning journey. Let’s redefine rigor in education and prepare our students for success in the 21st century and beyond.
    #Rigor #Redefined #Ten #Teaching #Habits #Surface #Deep #Transfer #Learning #Enables #students #ownership #learning #process

  • The Relationship Between Data Center MTBF and Total Cost of Ownership

    The Relationship Between Data Center MTBF and Total Cost of Ownership


    Data centers are a critical component of modern businesses, serving as the backbone for storing, processing, and managing data. As such, ensuring the reliability and availability of data center operations is paramount. One key metric used to measure the reliability of a data center is Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF), which represents the average time between system failures.

    MTBF is a crucial factor in determining the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) of a data center. TCO includes all costs associated with owning and operating a data center, including initial investment, maintenance, energy consumption, and downtime costs. A high MTBF value indicates that the data center is reliable and less prone to failures, resulting in lower downtime and maintenance costs.

    The relationship between MTBF and TCO is straightforward – the higher the MTBF value, the lower the TCO. Data centers with a high MTBF are more reliable, leading to reduced downtime and maintenance costs. This translates to increased productivity, improved operational efficiency, and ultimately, lower overall costs for the business.

    On the other hand, data centers with a low MTBF are more prone to failures, resulting in increased downtime and maintenance costs. This not only impacts the productivity of the business but also increases the risk of data loss and security breaches. In addition, frequent system failures can lead to a negative impact on the company’s reputation and customer satisfaction.

    To improve the MTBF of a data center and reduce TCO, businesses can implement various strategies. This includes investing in high-quality equipment and infrastructure, conducting regular maintenance and monitoring, implementing redundancy and failover mechanisms, and adopting best practices for data center management.

    In conclusion, the relationship between data center MTBF and TCO is clear – a high MTBF value leads to lower TCO, while a low MTBF value results in higher TCO. By prioritizing reliability and investing in measures to improve MTBF, businesses can significantly reduce costs, enhance operational efficiency, and ensure the smooth functioning of their data center operations.

Chat Icon