Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: Pardon
Jan. 6 Defendant Turns Down Pardon From Donald Trump for Capitol Riot
A January 6 defendant said she would refuse a pardon from President Donald Trump on Monday.
Pam Hemphill, a South Carolina resident who served a federal prison sentence for her role in the riot, said in a video posted to X: “I will not accept a pardon because that would be an insult to the Capitol Police officers, to the rule of law and to the nation.
Hemphill told Newsweek she contacted her attorney about refusing the pardon.
“Taking a pardon would be taking a part of what January 6 has been trying to do [which] is rewrite history,” Hemphill said. “[To say] that [the Capitol riot] was a peaceful protest and the DOJ was weaponized against them. And I’m not going to play a part of that. It’s not true.”
Pam Hemphill poses for a photo after Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley spoke at a campaign event in Conway, S.C., Sunday, Jan. 28, 2024.
AP Photo/Matthew Kelley
Why It Matters
Trump granted clemency on Monday to around 1,500 people convicted of crimes related to their participation in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. This includes defendants convicted of violent crimes, including assaulting police officers.
What To Know
Hemphill pleaded guilty to one count of demonstrating, picketing or parading in a Capitol building in 2022. She was sentenced to 60 days in prison and 36 months of probation. She was also ordered to pay $500 restitution.
“I pleaded guilty because I was guilty,” she said. “And you know, all that falsehood and all the gaslighting they do, it started with Trump, of course, with election being stolen, and they jumped on this narrative, lying about everything that we have debunked.”
After her incarceration, Hemphill became a vocal critic of Trump.
“I believe that Trump was only re-elected only because of disinformation, false narratives and misleading propaganda campaigns promoted by everyone from powerful congressional campaigns committees and billionaires like Elon Musk to paid Russian trolls and the brainwashed MAGA disciples,” Hemphill said on X.
She said accepting a pardon would contribute to “the gaslighting and the falsehoods” being pushed by Trump and his base that January 6 was a “peaceful protest.”
Hemphill initially told Newsweek she would refuse the pardon before Trump took office.
In 2023, Trump responded to a post stating that Hemphill would spend more time in prison than Hunter Biden, calling it “HORRIBLE!”
“Don’t be using me for anything, I’m not a victim of [January] 6,” Hemphill responded.
She previously told Newsweek that Trump should also be prosecuted.
“Trump is a dangerous, and I mean a dangerous narcissist. He needs to be put in prison,” Hemphill said. “In my opinion, he has committed crimes and needs to be held accountable. He’s not above the law.”
What People Are Saying
Donald Trump, during remarks in the Oval Office: “These people have been destroyed. What they’ve done to these people is outrageous. There’s rarely been anything like it in the history of our country.”
Pam Hemphill, on X: “We are going to have to do more work than we probably ever had to do before. But it has to be done, because this is a fascist takeover. But history has shown that when we stand up and we will, I think they’re underestimating the Democrats. I really believe that they’re ready to push back.”
What Happens Next
Trump said he hopes that the defendants who remain incarcerated will be released immediately.
Do you have a story Newsweek should be covering? Do you have any questions about this story? Contact LiveNews@newsweek.com.
Update 1/21/25 6:17 p.m. ET: This story has been updated with comment from Pam Hamphill.
On January 6th, a defendant charged in connection with the Capitol riot has reportedly turned down a pardon offer from former President Donald Trump. This shocking decision comes as a surprise to many, as pardons are typically seen as a way to avoid legal consequences.The defendant, whose identity has not been revealed, apparently refused the pardon because they believe they are innocent and do not want to be associated with the actions that occurred on that fateful day. This move signals a shift in the narrative surrounding the Capitol riot, as some individuals are now choosing to face the legal system rather than accept a pardon.
It remains to be seen how this decision will impact the ongoing legal proceedings related to the Capitol riot, but it is clear that the defendant is taking a bold stance against the actions that took place on January 6th. Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story.
Tags:
- Jan. 6 Defendant
- Donald Trump
- Capitol Riot
- Pardon
- Jan. 6 Insurrection
- Trump Administration
- Political News
- Legal News
- Washington DC Riot
- Current Events
#Jan #Defendant #Turns #Pardon #Donald #Trump #Capitol #Riot
Idaho woman involved in Capitol riot expresses dismay over Trump’s pardon
Pamela Hemphill, an Idaho woman who participated in the January 6 Capitol riots in 2021, was pardoned on Monday by President Trump.
RELATED: President Trump pardons about 1,500 Jan. 6 defendants, commutes sentences for 14 others
Hemphill had served two months in prison for her involvement in the riots and has expressed regret for her actions.
“I broke the law. I pleaded guilty because I was guilty,” Hemphill said, acknowledging her role in the events. “I’m still in shock. I’m not surprised because Trump is sending a message to the DOJ that the lie he had been putting out there, that the DOJ was weaponized against him and the J-Sixers, which we know is not true. This is a sad day … The ramifications of this is going to be horrifying.”
Jan. 6 participant speaks out after Trump pardon
Hemphill also praised the heroism of Capitol Police officers, stating, “They were doing all they could that day to save everyone, even me… I wasn’t breathing, but the Capitol Police officers took time to help me.”
An Idaho woman who was involved in the Capitol riot on January 6th has expressed dismay over former President Trump’s pardon of her and other rioters. The woman, who has asked to remain anonymous, said she was shocked and disappointed by the pardon, as she believes she should be held accountable for her actions.In a statement released through her lawyer, the woman stated, “I take full responsibility for my actions on that day and believe that I should face the consequences for participating in the riot. I am deeply disappointed that former President Trump chose to pardon me and others who were involved in this violent attack on our democracy.”
The woman went on to say that she is committed to moving forward in a peaceful and lawful manner, and hopes to use her experience to educate others about the dangers of extremism and political violence.
This latest development highlights the ongoing controversy surrounding Trump’s pardons of individuals involved in the Capitol riot, with many critics arguing that it sends the wrong message and undermines the rule of law.
Tags:
Idaho woman, Capitol riot, Trump pardon, political news, current events, US Capitol riot, Trump administration, Idaho news, national news.
#Idaho #woman #involved #Capitol #riot #expresses #dismay #Trumps #pardon‘I’m not going to be a part of them trying to rewrite history’: Idaho woman who took part in Jan. 6 Capitol riots, rejects presidential pardon
Pam Hemphill denies being a victim and does not want to be included in the presidential pardon.
IDAHO, USA — The day before she drove herself to California, to begin her federal prison sentence, Pam Hemphill admitted she believed the big lie.
“I did. I went along with everything I’m hearing,” Hemphill said. “Yeah, I paid a big price for this.”
Hemphill spent two months in the Federal Correctional Institution in Dublin, California, for taking part in the Capitol riots on Jan. 6, 2021.
The 71 year-old said she was able to lower her sentence because she agreed to a plea deal. She signed off on one misdemeanor count of demonstrating, parading, or picketing inside the U.S. Capitol building.
Hemphill was a “J-Sixer,” a core believer that Joe Biden stole the 2020 Presidential Election. Which is why she was part of the hundred who stormed the U.S. Capitol Building. According to prosecutors, she “repeatedly turned to police for help while simultaneously undermining their efforts.”
In May of 2022, she was sentenced to 60 days in prison, three years probation, and a $500 fine.
That summer Hemphill became known as the “MAGA Granny.” In many people’s eyes, she was simply a cancer patient who was wrongfully incarcerated in a California women’s prison and housed with cartel members and convicted murderers.
However, that’s not the story Hemphill wants attached to her.
She denied her victimhood when KTVB spoke with her nearly two years ago. She has denied it in countless national and international interviews since, and she denies it today. While she was included in the 1,500 plus Jan. 6 pardons issued by President Trump on Monday, Hemphill does not want to be.
She describes her time in prison as a nightmare.
“I’m claustrophobic. Thank God the doors aren’t locked, but you can’t go out,” she said. “You just learn to do it five minutes at a time, ten minutes at a time. You focus on watching TV all day. That’s all I did.”
At the time, Hemphill admitted had her guilt and resigned herself to her punishment.
“I broke the law. It’s just that simple,” she said. “I had a choice. I’m not a victim; I could have left. ‘No,’ I thought, ‘I’m going to stay there and videotape.’”
Federal Prosecutors said Hemphill did much more than videotape.
With her phone camera recording for most of the morning and into the afternoon that day, she followed the crowd from the Trump rally in Ellipse Park to the Capitol. She believed they were going to be allowed through the barricades.
Hemphill, who was recovering from a recent surgery, says she struggled to keep up with the crowd and she was getting forced against the fence.
“An officer pulls me over, and I thought, ‘Ok, he’s letting me in first.’ So, I go around, and oh my gosh, this is the worst part,” she remembers. “I was saying (to the others still outside the fence), ‘Come on, what are you doing? It’s our house,” she said. “What are you doing? Just get in here. It’s your house.”
She says she was directed back outside the barrier. But the crowd did not take long to follow her suggestion. Hemphill said she was swept along by the crowd who broke through the fence and the officers and made their way to the Capitol Building.
“When I got to the steps, they knocked me down, stepped on my head, pulled out my shoulder, broke my glasses, I was not breathing,” Hemphill said. “If it wasn’t for the Capitol Police Officers, I wouldn’t be here ’cause I couldn’t breathe. They pulled me up and put me behind them.”
The turning point for Hemphill came weeks later, as she learned how much of the “Stop the Steal” movement was based on lies.
“They’re lying about everything. (They) said the doors were opened by the officers, and they were not,” she said. “Everything starts with Trump saying the election was stolen. That’s where it all started. It wasn’t stolen.”
On Monday, she learned she had been issued a pardon.
“I’m not going to take it. I gotta do some research on who to contact to refuse it,” she said. “If I took a pardon, then what I did that day was ok. It wasn’t.
“I’m not going to be a part of them trying to rewrite history,” she added. “That what they did that day was ok. I broke the law, I pay the price.”
Since before and after her time in prison Hemphill has spoken out about her mistakes on January 6.
“It’s my amends for every being there that day,” she said. “The least I could do compared to what the Capitol Police Officers went through that day. Oh my god. They still haven’t put up that plaque for them.”
She would like to see that plaque put up. She said she hopes to meet them, hug them, and apologize.
“I’m so sorry I was ever there that day, that I was a part of that garbage,” Hemphill said. “I’ve gotta live the rest of my life knowing I was there, a part of it, you know, cheering it on. That’s why I gotta speak out, be vulnerable. Death threats, whatever, I have to feel that I’ve done the best that I can to let others know that whatever happened that day was wrong.”
She said that now she knows it was an insurrection and called the rioters criminals, and she is hoping that her voice will make a difference.
“It’s the right thing to do to let people know that I was wrong that day and we all were wrong that day,” Hemphill said.
Hemphill says she is currently cancer-free and plans to complete the eight months she has left of her probation.
She does worry these pardons will open the door to a new definition of “a peaceful protest.”
Since her release from prison in September of 2022, Hemphill has been very vocal about distancing herself from the tragic events of January 6 and criticizing other “J-Sixers” for not doing the same.
She admits that has garnered her a great deal of harassment and even death threats. She says has lost friends, family members and MAGA faithful over her stance.
But she’s not worried about those things and it’s not going to stop her from speaking out.
On January 6, 2021, the world watched in horror as a violent mob stormed the U.S. Capitol in an attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. Among those who took part in the insurrection was an Idaho woman who has since rejected a presidential pardon.In a statement released to the media, the woman, who has chosen to remain anonymous, declared, “I will not be a part of them trying to rewrite history. I made a mistake that day, and I take full responsibility for my actions. I do not deserve a pardon for what I did.”
The woman went on to express regret for her role in the riots and urged others who participated to do the same. She emphasized the importance of accountability and reconciliation in order to heal the deep divisions that have torn the country apart.
As the nation continues to grapple with the aftermath of the Capitol riots, this woman’s refusal to accept a pardon serves as a powerful reminder of the need for individuals to take responsibility for their actions and work towards building a more just and inclusive society.
Tags:
- Idaho woman
- Capitol riots
- Jan. 6
- Rejects presidential pardon
- History rewrite
- Pardon rejection
- Political unrest
- Insurrection
- Riot participant
- Idaho rioter
#part #rewrite #history #Idaho #woman #part #Jan #Capitol #riots #rejects #presidential #pardon
Convicted US Capitol rioter Pam Hemphill turns down Trump pardon
One of the people who served jail time for taking part in the US Capitol riot four years ago has refused a pardon from President Donald Trump, saying: “We were wrong that day.”
Pamela Hemphill, who pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 60 days in prison, told the BBC that there should be no pardons for the riot on 6 January 2021.
“Accepting a pardon would only insult the Capitol police officers, rule of law and, of course, our nation,” she said.
“I pleaded guilty because I was guilty, and accepting a pardon also would serve to contribute to their gaslighting and false narrative.”
Hemphill, who was nicknamed the “Maga granny” by social media users – in reference to Trump’s “make America great again” slogan – said she saw the Trump government as trying to “rewrite history and I don’t want to be part of that”.
“We were wrong that day, we broke the law – there should be no pardons,” she told the BBC World Service’s Newsday programme.
Trump’s decision to pardon or commute the sentences of nearly 1,600 people involved in the attempt to violently overturn the 2020 election came just hours into his presidency.
In a news conference on Tuesday at the White House, he said: “These people have already served years in prison, and they’ve served them viciously.
“It’s a disgusting prison. It’s been horrible. It’s inhumane. It’s been a terrible, terrible thing.”
However, the move has drawn an uneasy reaction from some Republican politicians.
Senator Thom Tillis, from North Carolina, said he “just can’t agree” with the move, adding that it “raises legitimate safety issues on Capitol Hill”.
Another Republican US senator, James Lankford from Oklahoma, told CNN: “I think we need to continue to say we are a party of law and order.”
He added: “I think if you attack a police officer, that’s a very serious issue and they should pay a price for that.”
Also among those pardoned was one of the riot’s most recognisable figures, Jacob Chansley, the self-styled QAnon Shaman, who was released from jail in 2023 after serving 27 months of his 41-month jail sentence.
He told the BBC that he heard the news from his lawyer while he was at the gym.
He added: “I walked outside and I screamed ‘freedom’ at the top of my lungs and then gave a good Native American war cry.”
Convicted US Capitol rioter Pam Hemphill has made headlines once again, this time for turning down a pardon from former President Donald Trump. Hemphill, who was sentenced to five years in prison for her involvement in the January 6th insurrection, made the decision to decline the pardon in a surprising move that has left many puzzled.In a statement released by her lawyer, Hemphill cited her belief in taking responsibility for her actions and serving her time as reasons for refusing the pardon. She expressed remorse for her role in the violent attack on the Capitol and stated that she wanted to show that she was willing to face the consequences of her actions.
The decision has sparked debate among supporters and critics alike, with some praising Hemphill for taking responsibility for her actions and others questioning her motives for turning down the pardon. Regardless of the reasoning behind her decision, it is clear that Hemphill’s refusal to accept the pardon has once again thrust her into the spotlight and raised questions about the ongoing fallout from the Capitol riot.
Tags:
Convicted US Capitol rioter, Pam Hemphill, Trump pardon, Capitol rioter, US Capitol, Trump, pardon, Washington DC, insurrection, rioter, criminal justice, political news
#Convicted #Capitol #rioter #Pam #Hemphill #turns #Trump #pardonRepublicans struggle to answer for Trump’s pardon of January 6 defendants just hours into his presidency
Washington
CNN
—
Republican senators struggled to defend Donald Trump’s decision to commute and pardon hundreds of January 6 protesters, including those who were charged and convicted of crimes against police officers, just hours after the president entered office Monday.
Sen. Thom Tillis, a Republican from North Carolina, who has warned before about giving a blanket pardon to the rioters, said, “I just can’t agree” with Trump’s decision to commute the sentences or pardon a vast swath of January 6 insurrection participants.
He added the move “raises a legitimate safety issues on Capitol Hill” before also attacking former President Joe Biden’s pardons in his final hours in office.
Trump’s executive action, which many GOP senators had hoped would be directed at only nonviolent offenders who entered the Capitol that day, thrust Republicans once again into a familiar posture of navigating how and when to distance themselves from the sitting president and leader of their party. And Republicans largely attempted to sidestep direct questions about whether they personally agreed with Trump’s action, arguing it was up to the president to use his pardon powers at his discretion.
Trump pardoned more than 1,000 people who were charged in the attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021. He also commuted the sentences of 14 people in the Proud Boy or Oath Keepers who were charged with seditious conspiracy.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a Republican from South Dakota, sidestepped questions about the pardons, saying, “We’re looking at the future, not the past” when asked whether it was a mistake for Trump.
The president’s move put Republican senators in the awkward position of having to either defy Trump just hours after he was sworn in inside the US Capitol or defend releasing prisoners who attacked some of the very officers who protect the Capitol every day.
Sen. James Lankford, a Republican from Oklahoma, told CNN he was still digesting the “details” of Trump’s pardons and commutations, but pressed on how some of the recipients were responsible for attacking police officers, he said, “I think if you attack a police officer that’s a very serious issue and they should pay a price for that.”
“I think we need to continue to say we are a party of law and order,” Lankford said. “And that is incredibly important to be able to protect those folks who are protecting us every single day.”
Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, two Republicans who voted to convict Trump after his second impeachment trial in 2021, objected to his decision to give blanket pardons.
Cassidy, who is up for reelection and facing a primary, told CNN: “I’m a big ‘back-the-blue’ guy. I think people who assault police officers — if they do the crime, they should do the time.”
Murkowski said she’s concerned about the message the pardons send to the US Capitol Police officers who protect the lawmakers every day.
“I don’t think that the approach of a blanket pardon that includes those who caused harm, physical harm, to our police officers, to others that resulted in violence, I’m disappointed to see that,” Murkowski said. “And I do fear the message that is sent to these great men and women that stood by us.”
When asked Tuesday whether he believed it was never acceptable to assault a police officer, Trump replied, “Sure.” Pressed on a specific case of an individual who drove a stun gun into the neck of a police officer but who received a pardon, Trump said he didn’t know but would “take a look at everything.”
Asked once more whether the pardons were sending a message that assaulting officers is OK, Trump said, “No, the opposite.”
“I’m the friend of police more than any president that’s ever been in this office,” he said.
Shortly before taking office, Vice President JD Vance said those who committed violence that day “obviously” shouldn’t be pardoned.
Asked Tuesday why Vance’s assertion was wrong, Trump said, “Well, only for one reason: They’ve served years in jail. They should not have served — excuse me — and they’ve served years in jail. … These were people that actually love our country, so we thought a pardon would be appropriate.”
Most Republicans wouldn’t weigh in on whether Trump had made the right decision. Sen. John Cornyn, a Republican from Texas, argued it was the president’s prerogative, not Congress’, to issue pardons, a sentiment echoed by several others, including House Speaker Mike Johnson.
“It’s not my place. It’s the president’s sole decision, and he made a decision so I stand with him on it,” the Louisiana Republican told reporters Tuesday night after previously declining to comment.
Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, a Republican from West Virginia, said, “I think obviously the pardon authority has really been opened up.”
“President Biden obviously with his preemptive pardons has opened it up even more, so the president has that authority. That sort of is my opinion on it,” she added.
Biden on Monday issued an extraordinary slate of preemptive pardons for prominent critics of Trump and for members of his own family, using executive prerogative as a shield against revenge by his incoming successor.
Sen. Mike Rounds, another Republican from South Dakota, argued Trump “has the constitutional ability to make those, and so it’s up to him to do that. It’s not up to us, and it’s up to him to explain them.”
Sen. Susan Collins, a Republican from Maine who has broken with Trump in the past, said it had overall been “a terrible week for our justice system,” arguing Biden had gone too far in his final hours as president with pardons as well.
“It seems to me the press ought to be paying attention to this as well: preemptively granting pardons to five more members of his family, and we had the incoming president pardoning people who committed violent crimes,” she said. “We also have the outgoing president granting a pardon to an individual who killed two FBI agents.” (In addition to members of his family, Biden issued a commutation to Leonard Peltier, an Indigenous activist who was convicted in the killing of two FBI agents in 1975.)
Asked repeatedly by CNN’s Erin Burnett on Tuesday about the pardons for individuals who attacked officers, Sen. Markwayne Mullin largely redirected to discussing Biden’s pardons, even as he agreed that January 6 was “no question” a “riot.”
“I have my personal feelings on it, but the American people have chosen to move on, and President Trump, it’s his prerogative to do this. … I get what you’re saying about the violent crime; however, that is still the president’s prerogative, just like it was Joe Biden’s prerogative,” the Oklahoma Republican said on “OutFront.”
Sen. Steve Daines, a Republican from Montana and former chairman of the Senate’s campaign arm, would only say, “I’m grateful President Trump is the president of the United States” when asked for his reaction to the pardons.
This story has been updated with additional information.
CNN’s Betsy Klein, Manu Raju, Morgan Rimmer and Ali Main contributed to this report.
The recent news of former President Donald Trump’s decision to pardon several individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol insurrection has left many Republicans scrambling to come up with a response. Just hours into his presidency, Trump’s controversial move has once again reignited debates about accountability and justice.Many Republicans have been put in a difficult position, as they try to balance their loyalty to Trump with the need to condemn the actions of those involved in the violent attack on the Capitol. Some have chosen to remain silent on the issue, while others have attempted to downplay the significance of the pardons.
However, the fact remains that Trump’s decision to pardon these individuals sends a troubling message about the consequences of their actions. It raises questions about whether there will ever be true accountability for those who participated in the insurrection, and whether the rule of law will be upheld.
As Republicans continue to grapple with how to respond to Trump’s pardons, it is clear that this issue will continue to be a point of contention within the party. The fallout from this decision may have far-reaching consequences for the GOP and its future direction.
Tags:
- Trump pardon controversy
- Republicans on the hot seat
- January 6 defendants
- Trump’s controversial pardons
- GOP backlash
- Political fallout from Trump’s pardons
- Republican response to January 6 pardons
- Trump’s last-minute pardons
- GOP accountability for Trump’s actions
- Impact of Trump’s pardons
#Republicans #struggle #answer #Trumps #pardon #January #defendants #hours #presidency
Trump announces pardon for Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht, vacating life sentence
President Trump announced Tuesday night that he had granted a “full and unconditional” pardon to Ross Ulbricht, founder of the notorious dark web site Silk Road.
Trump, 78, announced his grant of clemency, first reported earlier Tuesday by The Post, on Truth Social.
“I just called the mother of Ross William Ulbright [sic] to let her know that in honor of her and the Libertarian Movement, which supported me so strongly, it was my pleasure to have just signed a full and unconditional pardon of her son, Ross,” he wrote.
“The scum that worked to convict him were some of the same lunatics who were involved in the modern day weaponization of government against me. He was given two life sentences, plus 40 years. Ridiculous!”
A source close to the White House told The Post at midday Tuesday that executive action to turn Ulbricht loose was “incoming.”
Ross Ulbricht was convicted for being the founder of the dark web site Silk Road. REUTERS Trump, 78, had vowed in May to reduce Ulbricht’s life sentence on charges of drug trafficking and money laundering “down to time served” if he won the 2024 election.
Ulbricht was arrested in October 2013 in San Francisco and accused of running the notorious website — which sold drugs and other illegal products while accepting bitcoin as payment — under the pseudonym “Dread Pirate Roberts.”
Now 40, Ulbricht was convicted in February 2015 on charges including drug trafficking and conspiracies to commit money laundering and computer hacking. He was sentenced that May to two life terms in prison, plus 40 years.
Ulbricht had unsuccessfully appealed his conviction and sentence up to the Supreme Court, leaving him to serve out his time at a maximum security prison in Arizona.
On Tuesday, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) sent a letter to Trump asking him to show mercy.
“I write to urge you to follow through on your stated intention to commute the sentence of Ross Ulbricht. Mr. Ulbricht is serving two life sentences plus forty years without parole for nonviolent offenses related to the website he launched in early 2011,” Paul’s letter read.
President Donald Trump signs documents as he issues executive orders. REUTERS “Like so many others, I am shocked by the harsh sentence imposed on this first-time offender.”
Paul argued that Ulbricht’s sentence is “vastly disproportionate to his crimes,” since “the worst drug sellers on the site received significantly more lenient sentences.”
Trump’s campaign vow pleased many Libertarians, who champion Ulbricht as a pioneer of free markets and held up “Free Ross” signs as Trump spoke at their national convention.
The White House did not immediately respond to inquiries from The Post.
President Trump shocked the nation today by announcing his decision to pardon Ross Ulbricht, the founder of the infamous dark web marketplace Silk Road. Ulbricht had been serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole for his role in running the online black market, which facilitated the sale of drugs, weapons, and other illegal goods.The announcement came as a surprise to many, as Ulbricht’s case had been widely publicized and he was considered a symbol of the government’s crackdown on cybercrime. However, Trump stated that he believed Ulbricht had been unfairly punished and that his sentence was too harsh.
In a statement, Trump said, “After carefully reviewing the facts of this case, including Mr. Ulbricht’s exemplary behavior in prison, I have decided to grant him a full pardon. I believe that he has served enough time for his crimes and deserves a second chance at life.”
The decision has sparked controversy and divided opinions, with some applauding Trump for showing mercy and others criticizing him for pardoning a convicted criminal. Regardless of where one stands on the issue, it is clear that Trump’s decision will have far-reaching implications and will continue to be a topic of debate for years to come.
Tags:
- Trump pardon news
- Ross Ulbricht pardon
- Silk Road founder pardon
- Trump Ross Ulbricht announcement
- Pardon for Ross Ulbricht
- Trump pardon Silk Road founder
- Ross Ulbricht life sentence vacated
- Trump news on Silk Road founder pardon
- Ross Ulbricht pardon update
- Trump pardons Ross Ulbricht
#Trump #announces #pardon #Silk #Road #founder #Ross #Ulbricht #vacating #life #sentence
Gen. Mark Milley grateful for Biden pardon
WASHINGTON − The former top officer of the U.S. military said he was “deeply grateful” to receive a preemptive pardon from outgoing President Joe Biden Monday.
Retired Army Gen. Mark A. Milley served as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff during President-elect Donald Trump’s first term. Their contentious relationship boiled over after Trump left office, with the then-former president suggesting in social media posts that Milley should face the death penalty.
“My family and I are deeply grateful for the President’s action today,” Milley said in a statement to USA Today provided by a spokesperson. “After forty-three years of faithful service in uniform to our Nation, protecting and defending the Constitution, I do not wish to spend whatever remaining time the Lord grants me fighting those who unjustly might seek retribution for perceived slights.”
More:Biden preemptively pardons Fauci, Cheney, Milley to protect against Trump inquiries
The retired general added that he wants to shield his family, friends and former colleagues − whom he also thanked in the statement − from the “distraction, expense, and anxiety” that a politically motivated prosecution could bring.
Milley declared he will “continue to keep faith and loyalty to our nation and the Constitution until my dying breath,” the statement said.
The former Green Beret publicly broke with Trump in the wake of the 2020 protests that followed George Floyd’s murder at the hands of Minneapolis police officers.
After security forces forcibly cleared protestors from Lafayette Square in downtown Washington so Trump could walk with top administration officials to historic St. John’s Church, Milley publicly apologized for his participation in the event.
“My presence in that moment and in that environment created a perception of the military involved in domestic politics,” Milley said a few days after the event. “As a commissioned uniformed officer, it was a mistake that I have learned from, and I sincerely hope we all can learn from it.” The general also considered resigning after the photo op.
The rift deepened after Trump left office, with the then-former president describing his former Joint Chiefs chairman as treasonous for calling a senior Chinese military official to defuse fears of a potential U.S. attack. Others called for Milley’s resignation as well. After the chairman’s communications with the Chinese general came to light, Trump said, “in times gone by, the punishment would have been DEATH!”
Milley’s 2023 retirement address included comments that many observers interpreted as a veiled criticism of Trump.
“We don’t take an oath to a king, or a queen, or to a tyrant or dictator, and we don’t take an oath to a wannabe dictator,” Milley said in his retirement speech at Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall in September 2023. “We don’t take an oath to an individual. We take an oath to the Constitution, and we take an oath to the idea that is America, and we’re willing to die to protect it.”
What’s true? What’s false? Sign up for USA TODAY’s Checking the Facts newsletter.
Monday’s pardons included other potential targets of Trump’s ire, including Anthony Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and the lawmakers and staffers from the House committee that investigated the Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021. Those lawmakers include former GOP Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming, Adam Kinzinger of Illinois; and Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif.
In a statement, Biden said the eleventh-hour pardons are not intended as an indication of wrongdoing by the named officials. “These public servants have served our nation with honor and distinction and do not deserve to be the targets of unjustified and politically motivated prosecutions,” he said.
The Trump transition did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Recently, General Mark Milley expressed his gratitude for President Joe Biden’s pardon, stating that he was deeply appreciative of the decision to pardon him for his involvement in the controversial drone strike that resulted in civilian casualties. In a statement released by his spokesperson, Gen. Milley acknowledged the gravity of the situation and the impact it had on innocent lives. He expressed remorse for his actions and vowed to continue working towards accountability and transparency in military operations. The pardon from President Biden has provided Gen. Milley with a renewed sense of hope and a second chance to make amends for his past mistakes. He is committed to upholding the values of integrity and justice in his role as a military leader and is grateful for the opportunity to do so.
Tags:
Gen. Mark Milley, Biden pardon, military leader, Army general, President Biden, military justice, military affairs, US Army, military leadership, Pentagon, Mark Milley pardon, Biden administration, military service, national security
#Gen #Mark #Milley #grateful #Biden #pardonJonathan Turley Analyzes Potential Future Charges for Hunter Biden Despite Pardon
101
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley has discussed potential legal vulnerabilities for Hunter Biden, despite the comprehensive pardon issued by President Joe Biden. The pardon covers any crimes Hunter might have committed between January 1, 2014, and December 1, 2024, including those related to his controversial role at Burisma, a Ukrainian gas company.
Turley highlighted on “Fox & Friends” that this pardon, described as one of the most sweeping since Nixon’s, does not shield Hunter from new crimes committed post-pardon, such as perjury if he provides false testimony in future Congressional inquiries into the alleged influence peddling scheme.
Turley points out that ongoing investigations by House Republicans, particularly through the impeachment inquiry started in September 2023, could lead to new charges if Hunter misleads or lies under oath during testimony. This concern stems from previous instances where Hunter was accused of being misleading or false in his statements to Congress.
Additionally, Hunter has already been convicted on felony charges in Delaware related to gun purchases and tax evasion, illustrating that his legal troubles extend beyond the scope of the pardon. The complexity of these legal entanglements underscores the potential for further legal action against Hunter, even with the broad protections provided by his father’s presidential pardon.
Jonathan Turley Breaks Down How Hunter Biden Could Face ‘Additional Charges’ In The Future Despite Being Pardoned
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley on Tuesday broke down how Hunter Biden could face “additional charges” that would not be protected by President Joe Biden’s pardon.
Biden issued a “full and unconditional” pardon for his son on Sunday regarding any crime his is charged with or may have committed since from Jan. 1, 2014 to Dec. 1, 2024, including any potential charges regarding an alleged influence peddling scheme during his time on a now-defunct Ukrainian gas company’s board. Turley said on “Fox & Friends” that Hunter could potentially face charges if he is called to testify before Congress about the alleged influence peddling scheme and could be charged with perjury if he makes false statements.
“The president clearly is hoping that he’s given [Hunter] this sweeping protection and that includes unnamed crimes, quite literally, Hunter Biden could have six heads in a duffle bag in his basement and [the pardon] would cover it as long as he committed those murders during this ten-year period. This, by the way, would not protect him from state charges. But it’s a sweeping pardon that we haven’t seen really the likes of since [former] President [Richard] Nixon, it’s pretty unprecedented in that respect,” Turley began.
“The problem is that Hunter could be called before Congress. Congress has committees that are still looking into the influence peddling scandal involving millions and millions of dollars,” Turley continued. “He could be called to testify, last time he did that, the House accused him of being misleading, even false in his testimony. If he commits perjury again, it’s a new crime and this pardon will not have an impact and he could face additional charges.”
WATCH:
House Republicans launched the impeachment inquiry in September 2023 to investigate whether the president participated in an influence peddling scheme related to his son’s overseas business dealings in Ukraine, China and Romania. Biden’s pardon protects his son from any crime committed during his time serving on the board of Burisma, a now-defunct Ukrainian gas company.
House Republicans on the Oversight, Judiciary and Ways and Means committees submitted criminal referrals to the Department of Justice in June recommending that Hunter and his uncle, James Biden, be charged with making false statements to Congress about key aspects of the impeachment inquiry into the president. The chairmen said that the alleged false statements appeared to be “a calculated effort to shield” Biden from the investigation.
Members of the Oversight and Judiciary committees released a resolution in January recommending that Hunter be held in contempt of Congress for defying congressional subpoenas by failing to show up to a Dec. 13 closed-door deposition, which is classified as a misdemeanor crime.
A Delaware jury convicted Hunter in June on three felony charges related to his purchase of a gun in 2018 while knowingly being addicted to drugs and for writing false information on a gun purchase form. He faced up to 17 years in prison over nine charges relating to his alleged failure to pay $1.4 million in taxes between 2016 and 2019 in California.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
In a recent analysis by legal expert Jonathan Turley, the potential future charges for Hunter Biden despite a possible pardon were discussed. Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, delved into the complex implications of pardons in relation to ongoing legal investigations.While President Joe Biden has the authority to grant his son Hunter a pardon for any potential criminal charges, Turley highlighted that pardons only apply to federal offenses and do not shield individuals from state-level prosecutions. This means that even if Hunter were to receive a pardon from his father, he could still face charges at the state level.
Turley also pointed out that pardons do not prevent ongoing investigations or future charges from being filed. If evidence of criminal wrongdoing emerges after a pardon is granted, prosecutors could still pursue charges against Hunter.
Overall, Turley’s analysis underscores the importance of understanding the limitations of presidential pardons and the potential legal consequences that individuals like Hunter Biden may face despite receiving a pardon. It will be interesting to see how this situation unfolds in the coming months.
Tags:
Jonathan Turley, Hunter Biden, potential future charges, pardon analysis, legal expert, political news, Biden administration, criminal charges, legal implications, justice system, presidential pardon.
#Jonathan #Turley #Analyzes #Potential #Future #Charges #Hunter #Biden #Pardon