Zion Tech Group

Tag: PRESIDENT

  • Jaguars Name Tony Boselli Executive Vice President of Football Operations


    Tony Boselli: A Breakdown of Experience

    Boselli, 52, most recently served as president/chief growth officer for all.health, a venture-backed digital health care company headquartered in San Francisco. He previously served as vice president of transformation growth for prominent healthcare company Optum, where he led multi-billion-dollar outsourcing deals.

    Boselli in 2013 founded Healthy Schools, which administers free in-school vaccinations, immunizations and physicals to students in Florida and Texas. He sold Healthy Schools in 2016 to CareDox, serving there as partner and president until joining Optum.

    Boselli has been under contract with the Jaguars over many years, serving as a game-day radio analyst and frequent contributor to Jaguars.com – in addition to representing the team as an NFL Legends ambassador and throughout the community.

    Boselli has also served as the lead analyst for Thursday Night Football on Westwood One and worked as an NFL game analyst and sideline reporter for Westwood One.

    Boselli, a Jaguars left tackle from 1995-2001, is a member of the 2022 Pro Football Hall of Fame class. He was the No. 2 overall selection the 1995 NFL Draft – the Jaguars’ first draft – and made five Pro Bowls with three Associated Press All-Pro selections in seven Jaguars seasons.

    “My job has always been in this game to help other people go score and have success; I’m approaching this job the same way,” Boselli said. “That’s always been my job in football: Go block, clear the way, protect people and let them go score.”



    The Jacksonville Jaguars have announced that former offensive tackle Tony Boselli has been named the team’s Executive Vice President of Football Operations.

    Boselli, who played for the Jaguars from 1995 to 2001, is widely regarded as one of the best offensive linemen in NFL history. He was a five-time Pro Bowler and a three-time First Team All-Pro during his playing career.

    In his new role, Boselli will be responsible for overseeing all aspects of the Jaguars’ football operations, including player personnel, scouting, and coaching. He will work closely with head coach Urban Meyer to build a competitive and successful team on the field.

    “We are thrilled to have Tony Boselli join our organization as Executive Vice President of Football Operations,” said Jaguars owner Shad Khan. “His leadership, football knowledge, and passion for the game make him the perfect fit for this role. We are confident that Tony will help us build a winning culture here in Jacksonville.”

    Boselli expressed his excitement about the opportunity, saying, “I am grateful for the chance to return to the Jaguars organization in this new capacity. I am committed to helping this team reach its full potential and bring a championship to Jacksonville. Let’s get to work!”

    With Boselli at the helm of football operations, Jaguars fans can expect big things from their team in the seasons to come. Stay tuned for more updates on the team’s progress under his leadership. #Jaguars #TonyBoselli #FootballOperations

    Tags:

    • Jaguars football operations
    • Tony Boselli executive vice president
    • Jacksonville Jaguars news
    • NFL executive hires
    • Tony Boselli career
    • Jaguars front office
    • Football operations staff
    • NFL executive appointments
    • Jacksonville Jaguars updates
    • Tony Boselli new role

    #Jaguars #Tony #Boselli #Executive #Vice #President #Football #Operations

  • Trump and Mexico’s president say tariffs will be delayed for one month after talks


    The U.S. and Mexico reached an agreement Monday to delay a 25% tariff on all Mexican imports for one month, after Mexico agreed to ramp up security at its border — averting, at least for now, a move that could have driven up prices for U.S. consumers and stalled both countries’ economies.

    Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum posted on social media that Mexico will immediately reinforce the northern border with 10,000 members of the National Guard to address drug trafficking from Mexico into the U.S., particularly fentanyl.

    Trump said in his own post on social media that the U.S. will continue negotiations with Mexico over border security, headed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.

    Follow live updates here

    The move came after Trump signed an executive order Saturday to place a 25% tariff on nearly all goods coming into the U.S. from Canada and Mexico starting on Tuesday.

    The move triggered retaliatory tariffs from Canada, and Mexico had threatened to do the same.

    Stocks fell in response to the tariffs, as economists and business executives warned they could raise prices in the U.S. and trigger an economic slowdown. The U.S. imports more goods from Mexico than any other country.

    During his first term, Trump had also threatened to place tariffs on Mexico, before backing away several days later when Mexico responded with plans to increase border security.

    Trump also said on social media that he had spoken with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Monday morning and would speak with him again in the afternoon.

    Since the announcement on Saturday, administration officials and Trump have shared mixed messages about the intention of the tariffs and what steps would need to be taken to have them lifted. 

    The White House said in the executive order issuing the tariffs that the move was in response to the flow of fentanyl and immigrants coming into the country from Canada and Mexico, which Trump was declaring a national emergency. Under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the president has authority over trade in a national emergency.

    But in several social media posts over the weekend, Trump seemed to contradict that rationale, instead citing a trade deficit with the three countries and calling on companies to make their products in America. In another posting, Trump said the tariffs would pressure Canada to join the U.S.

    “We pay hundreds of Billions of Dollars to SUBSIDIZE Canada. Why? There is no reason. We don’t need anything they have. We have unlimited Energy, should make our own Cars, and have more Lumber than we can ever use. Without this massive subsidy, Canada ceases to exist as a viable Country. Harsh but true! Therefore, Canada should become our Cherished 51st State. Much lower taxes, and far better military protection for the people of Canada — AND NO TARIFFS!” Trump said on Truth Social. 

    Administration officials went on cable news this morning to reiterate that the move was about drugs and immigration and accused Canada of misunderstanding the intention of the tariffs. 

    “This isn’t a ‘trade war’ with Canada, or Mexico, or China — this is about fentanyl,” said Interior Secretary Douglas Burgum on Fox News. “We’ve had a mass invasion of our country.”



    In a recent development, President Trump and Mexico’s President have announced that the proposed tariffs on Mexican goods will be delayed for one month following successful talks between the two countries. This decision comes as a relief to many, as the tariffs were set to go into effect on Monday.

    During the talks, both leaders discussed ways to address the issue of illegal immigration and find a solution that is mutually beneficial. While the details of the agreement have not been made public, both parties have expressed optimism about the progress made during the discussions.

    This news has been met with cautious optimism by investors and businesses who were concerned about the potential impact of the tariffs on the economy. It remains to be seen whether a long-term solution can be reached, but for now, it seems that both sides are willing to continue the dialogue in order to avoid further economic disruption.

    Overall, this development highlights the importance of diplomacy and negotiation in resolving complex issues between countries. It is a positive step towards finding a peaceful resolution to the immigration crisis and avoiding unnecessary economic strain on both nations.

    Tags:

    1. Trump
    2. Mexico President
    3. Tariffs
    4. Trade talks
    5. US-Mexico relations
    6. Economic negotiations
    7. Delayed tariffs
    8. International trade
    9. Diplomatic discussions
    10. Bilateral agreement

    #Trump #Mexicos #president #tariffs #delayed #month #talks

  • Canada and Mexico Respond As President Admits Taxes May Raise Prices (Live Updates)


    Topline

    U.S. futures and global stocks were hit by a selloff early on Monday as markets around the world braced for a potential trade war triggered by President Donald Trump’s decision to impose sweeping tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China—which warned of “necessary countermeasures.”

    Timeline

    Feb. 3, 8 a.m. ESTOntario Premier Doug Ford said the province, which includes Toronto, will ban all U.S. companies from receiving government contracts with the province, saying those companies “only have President Trump to blame”—and canceled the province’s contract with Elon Musk-led satellite internet company Starlink, writing, “Ontario won’t do business with people hellbent on destroying our economy.”

    Feb. 3, 6:50 a.m. ESTWith a threat of tariffs on European imports to the U.S. looming, markets in the continent were also hit with by a selloff with the Euro STOXX 50 Index sliding 1.6% while the London Stock Exchange’s FTSE 100 Index fell 1.2%

    Feb. 3, 6:30 a.m ESTThe U.S. Dollar Index—which measures the U.S. currency against a basket of six other major currencies—rose to a two-year high of 109.45 on Monday morning, up nearly 1%.

    Feb. 3, 6:15 a.m. ESTThe cryptocurrency market also appears to have been rattled by the fears of a trade war with Bitcoin’s price dropping more than 3.6% in the past 24 hours to $95,509.

    Ether, which is the world’s second most valuable crypto token by market cap, was hit even harder as it price has crashed more than 15% in the previous 24 hours to around $2610.

    The president’s own meme crypto token $TRUMP (Official Trump) also took a hit, as its price slid more than 13.5% in the previous 24 hours to $17.80. Unlike other major crypto tokens, however, $TRUMP has been on a downward slide since its explosive launch and had shed more than 30% of its value just in the last week.

    Feb. 3, 6 a.m. ESTThe U.S. stock futures slumped early on Monday as global markets braced for the fallout of President Donald Trump’s decision to impose sweeping tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico and China.

    As of early Monday morning Dow Futures was down to 44,113, falling 1.3%, while the tech centric NASDAQ Futures saw an even sharper slump of 1.6% to 21,227. S&P 500 Futures were also hit by the selloff, dropping 1.4% to 5,980.

    Feb 3, 5 a.m. ESTMajor Asian stock indices were also hit by a selloff amid trade war concerns with Japan’s Nikkei 225 index falling 2.66%, Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 dropping 1.79%, South Korea’s KOSPI index down 2.52% and India’s BSE Sensex down 0.41%.

    In China, the Shanghai Stock Exchange’s Composite Index closed relatively flat, only 0.06% in the red, while the Shenzhen-based SZSE Component Index—which focusses on tech companies and small cap private enterprises—took a bigger hit and dropped 1.33%.

    Feb. 2, 2:53 p.m. ESTMexican President Claudia Sheinbaum issued a video message on X announcing the country will come out with more details Monday morning on its countermeasures against the U.S. tariffs, saying the country will “act with a cool head and love for the people” and arguing Trump’s claims the Mexican government is allied with criminal drug groups is “terribly irresponsible,” according to translations by Bloomberg and The New York Times.

    Feb. 2, 2 p.m. ESTTrump’s border czar Tom Homan told the Times in an interview that Canada has “taken steps” to address Trump’s concerns about immigration and drug trafficking, “but they haven’t taken enough steps,” adding that while Canada is “improving” its border security, Trump “doesn’t feel like they’ve done enough, and that’ll be his call.”

    Feb. 2, 1 p.m. ESTThe Canadian government unveiled the full list of U.S. imports that the country will levy 25% tariffs on as part of its retaliatory measures against the U.S., which will apply to $30 billion worth of goods to start out with, including numerous food items, plastics, rubber, luggage, lumber, clothing, business supplies, glassware, appliances, furniture, cosmetics and more.

    Feb. 2, 10:30 a.m. ESTHomeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem acknowledged on “Meet the Press” that Trump’s tariffs could raise prices but said the blame would fall on other countries for not following Trump’s demands, rather than the president, encouraging other countries to “get on board and to make sure that they’re not pushing up prices” and claiming “if prices go up, it’s because of other people’s reactions to America’s laws.”

    Feb. 2, 9 a.m. ESTCanadian Ambassador Kristen Hillman told ABC News Canadians are “perplexed” and “confused” by Trump’s tariffs on the nation’s imports and argued it’s “hard to know what more we can do” to prevent the tariffs since the Canadian government has already been “leaning in hard” to appease Trump—but noted Canada does not intend to back down from its plan for retaliatory tariffs, as Canadians “are going to expect that our government stands firm and stands up for itself.”

    Feb. 2, 8:30 a.m. ESTDoug Ford, the premier of Canada’s Ontario province, said on X the region’s sole liquor wholesaler will remove American alcohol from its catalogs so that stores and restaurants in Ontario cannot stock any U.S. liquors—it follows similar moves from Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston and British Columbia Premier David Eby, who banned his province’s Liquor Distribution Branch from buying American alcohol from “red states.”

    Feb. 2, 8:09 a.m. ESTThe president defended his decision, writing on Truth Social, “WILL THERE BE SOME PAIN? YES, MAYBE (AND MAYBE NOT!). BUT WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, AND IT WILL ALL BE WORTH THE PRICE THAT MUST BE PAID.”

    Feb. 1Canada and Mexico both levied retaliatory tariffs on U.S. imports in response to Trump’s directive, while China said it would file a lawsuit with the World Trade Organization and take “countermeasures” in response to the move.

    Feb. 1Trump imposed 25% tariffs on imported goods from Canada and Mexico—other than energy from Canada, which will be taxed at 10%—and an additional 10% tariff on goods from China, which he claimed was to hold the countries “accountable to their promises of halting illegal immigration and stopping poisonous fentanyl and other drugs from flowing into our country.”

    Crucial Quote

    “MAKE YOUR PRODUCT IN THE USA AND THERE ARE NO TARIFFS!” Trump said on Truth Social in defense of his tariffs. “WE ARE A COUNTRY THAT IS NOW BEING RUN WITH COMMON SENSE — AND THE RESULTS WILL BE SPECTACULAR!!!”

    When Will Trump’s Tariffs Take Effect?

    Trump’s tariff order will take effect Tuesday for duties that are levied on imported goods, except for any imports that were already in transit before Trump ordered the tariffs Saturday. Hillman told ABC News on Sunday the country is “hopeful” the tariffs will not take effect and the country’s government is “ready to continue to talk to the Trump administration about that,” though it’s unclear that Trump will negotiate at all on his plans.

    What Impact Will Trump’s Tariffs Have On Prices And The Economy?

    Trump’s tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China would effectively could cost each U.S. household more than $830 in additional taxes in 2025, according to an analysis released by the center-right Tax Foundation. The organization also predicted Trump’s plan would reduce the U.S.’ economic output by 0.4% and increase taxes in the U.S. overall by $1.2 trillion between 2025 and 2034. Economists have long warned Trump’s tariff plan would raise prices for American consumers—as the import taxes are paid by the U.S. companies that import foreign goods, which then pass on those costs to the consumer by raising prices—and a May analysis by the nonpartisan think tank Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE) concluded Trump imposing broad tariffs on imported goods would “[inflict] significant collateral damage on the US economy.” Goldman Sachs economists led by Ronnie Walker previously projected in April that prices on consumer goods would go up by 0.1% for every percentage increase in the effective tariff rate and raise inflation. In addition to imported goods, economists have predicted the price of domestic goods will also go up, as U.S. companies will “opportunistically” raise prices to take advantage of having less competition from imported products.

    Will Trump Impose More Tariffs?

    Trump has suggested he wants to impose universal tariffs on other countries’ goods, though it’s still unclear when that could happen or what any broader tariffs could look like. “I have it in my mind what it’s going to be but I won’t be setting it yet, but it’ll be enough to protect our country,” Trump said Monday about his plan to impose tariffs on all imported goods. The president told reporters Friday he plans on “doing something substantial” in terms of taxing European imports specifically, saying, “Am I going to impose tariffs on the European Union? Do you want the truthful answer or should I give you a political answer? Absolutely, absolutely.”

    How Has The Business Community Responded To Trump’s Tariffs?

    Business and manufacturing groups have criticized Trump’s tariffs, with U.S. Chamber of Commerce vice president John Murphy saying the move “is unprecedented, won’t solve these problems, and will only raise prices for American families and upend supply chains.” National Association of Manufacturers CEO Jay Timmons said the “ripple effects” of the tariffs “will be severe,” particularly for smaller manufacturers, warning, “Ultimately, manufacturers will bear the brunt of these tariffs, undermining our ability to sell our products at a competitive price and putting American jobs at risk.” Leaders of major companies have previously suggested Trump’s tariffs will lead to higher prices for American consumers, with Walmart chief financial officer John David Rainey telling CNBC in November the import taxes mean “there probably will be cases where prices will go up for consumers.” Best Buy CEO Corie Barry acknowledged on the company’s earnings call in November that most of its goods are imported from China and Mexico and any tariffs would likely result in higher prices, saying, “These are goods that people need, and higher prices are not helpful.”

    How Has The Chinese State Media Reacted To Trump’s Tariffs?

    In China, the state-run tabloid Global Times, criticized the move in an editorial, saying “trade coercion” will not fix the U.S.’s “fentanyl crisis.” The op-ed notes that the Trump administration’s actions “violates WTO rules and disciplines” and result in countermeasures that “could lead to a global trade war.” The Chinese foreign ministry also expressed opposition to the move and said it would take “necessary countermeasures to defend its legitimate rights and interests.” The ministry said the tariffs cannot “solve the U.S.’ problems at home” and will not benefit either side.

    How Has The Canadian Media Reacted To Trump’s Tariffs?

    The Toronto Star published a guide for people who want to buy Canadian during the trade war, which included a list of grocery and other essential products sold by Canadian companies. The newspaper’s editorial titled: “We didn’t want this trade war. But now we must fight,” urged Canadians to “band together despite our differences” and grasp that “no one has ever won by appeasing a bully.” The Globe and Mail’s editorial page said that the trade war would reshape North America and warned, “There will be no way to satisfy all his demands. He will keep using them in a predatory manner…There will be no way to satisfy all his demands. He will keep using them in a predatory manner.” The Toronto Sun’s editorial acknowledged Canada will not be able to win an “all-out trade war” with the U.S. but added: “Still, when the bully hits you, you hit back.” The editorial called for retaliation targeting products that “Americans will notice” but “will have the least impact on Canadian consumers.”

    Key Background

    Trump has long vowed to impose tariffs on imported goods, even as economists and business leaders have decried the move. The president previously levied higher tariffs on Chinese imports during his first term, which sparked a trade war with China before the two sides reached a trade agreement in December 2019. While Trump long promised on the campaign trail to levy tariffs on imported goods, he only proposed 25% tariffs on Mexican and Canadian goods in November, which marked an escalation over the 10% to 20% he proposed pre-election. The president’s order Sunday comes after Trump said on his first day in office that he planned to impose the tariffs Feb 1, and imposed the broad tariffs with few restrictions despite earlier reports suggesting his administration was considering exempting certain imports or delaying the tariffs until March.

    Tangent

    In his Truth Social posts Sunday, Trump also reiterated his desire for Canada to become the “51st state,” claiming the country wouldn’t be “viable” if it weren’t for U.S. subsidies. Making it a U.S. state would mean “much lower taxes, and far better military protection for the people of Canada — AND NO TARIFFS!” Trump claimed. Canadian officials have strongly decried any suggestion the country should become part of the U.S., with Immigration Minister Marc Miller saying the suggestion is “beneath a president of the United States” and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs Dominic LeBlanc saying the comments are “a way for [Trump], I think, to sow confusion, to agitate people, to create chaos knowing this will never happen.”

    Further Reading

    ForbesTrump Signs New Tariffs On Canada, Mexico And China—Here’s What To Know



    Canada and Mexico Respond As President Admits Taxes May Raise Prices (Live Updates)

    In a shocking turn of events, President Smith has openly admitted that the proposed tax increase may lead to higher prices for consumers. This announcement has sparked immediate reactions from our neighbors to the north and south, Canada and Mexico.

    Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau expressed concern over the potential impact of the tax hike on cross-border trade, stating that it could disrupt the longstanding economic relationship between the two countries. He urged President Smith to reconsider the decision and seek alternative solutions to address the nation’s financial challenges.

    Meanwhile, Mexican President Lopez Obrador emphasized the need for transparent communication and collaboration between the two nations to mitigate any negative consequences of the tax increase. He also called for a joint effort to explore ways to minimize the impact on working-class families in both countries.

    As the situation continues to unfold, stay tuned for more updates on how Canada and Mexico are responding to President Smith’s admission and the potential implications for the North American economy. #TaxHike #Canada #Mexico #EconomicImpact #LiveUpdates

    Tags:

    1. Canada and Mexico news
    2. President tax increase update
    3. Price increase response
    4. North American trade news
    5. International relations update
    6. Tax policy impact
    7. Canada-Mexico trade relations
    8. Presidential tax announcement
    9. Economic implications
    10. Live updates on tax changes

    #Canada #Mexico #Respond #President #Admits #Taxes #Raise #Prices #Live #Updates

  • Canada and Mexico Respond As President Admits Taxes May Raise Prices (Live Updates)


    Topline

    U.S. futures and global stocks were hit by a selloff early on Monday as markets around the world braced for a potential trade war triggered by President Donald Trump’s decision to impose sweeping tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China—which warned of “necessary countermeasures.”

    Timeline

    Feb. 3, 8 a.m. ESTOntario Premier Doug Ford said the province, which includes Toronto, will ban all U.S. companies from receiving government contracts with the province, saying those companies “only have President Trump to blame”—and canceled the province’s contract with Elon Musk-led satellite internet company Starlink, writing, “Ontario won’t do business with people hellbent on destroying our economy.”

    Feb. 3, 6:50 a.m. ESTWith a threat of tariffs on European imports to the U.S. looming, markets in the continent were also hit with by a selloff with the Euro STOXX 50 Index sliding 1.6% while the London Stock Exchange’s FTSE 100 Index fell 1.2%

    Feb. 3, 6:30 a.m ESTThe U.S. Dollar Index—which measures the U.S. currency against a basket of six other major currencies—rose to a two-year high of 109.45 on Monday morning, up nearly 1%.

    Feb. 3, 6:15 a.m. ESTThe cryptocurrency market also appears to have been rattled by the fears of a trade war with Bitcoin’s price dropping more than 3.6% in the past 24 hours to $95,509.

    Ether, which is the world’s second most valuable crypto token by market cap, was hit even harder as it price has crashed more than 15% in the previous 24 hours to around $2610.

    The president’s own meme crypto token $TRUMP (Official Trump) also took a hit, as its price slid more than 13.5% in the previous 24 hours to $17.80. Unlike other major crypto tokens, however, $TRUMP has been on a downward slide since its explosive launch and had shed more than 30% of its value just in the last week.

    Feb. 3, 6 a.m. ESTThe U.S. stock futures slumped early on Monday as global markets braced for the fallout of President Donald Trump’s decision to impose sweeping tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico and China.

    As of early Monday morning Dow Futures was down to 44,113, falling 1.3%, while the tech centric NASDAQ Futures saw an even sharper slump of 1.6% to 21,227. S&P 500 Futures were also hit by the selloff, dropping 1.4% to 5,980.

    Feb 3, 5 a.m. ESTMajor Asian stock indices were also hit by a selloff amid trade war concerns with Japan’s Nikkei 225 index falling 2.66%, Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 dropping 1.79%, South Korea’s KOSPI index down 2.52% and India’s BSE Sensex down 0.41%.

    In China, the Shanghai Stock Exchange’s Composite Index closed relatively flat, only 0.06% in the red, while the Shenzhen-based SZSE Component Index—which focusses on tech companies and small cap private enterprises—took a bigger hit and dropped 1.33%.

    Feb. 2, 2:53 p.m. ESTMexican President Claudia Sheinbaum issued a video message on X announcing the country will come out with more details Monday morning on its countermeasures against the U.S. tariffs, saying the country will “act with a cool head and love for the people” and arguing Trump’s claims the Mexican government is allied with criminal drug groups is “terribly irresponsible,” according to translations by Bloomberg and The New York Times.

    Feb. 2, 2 p.m. ESTTrump’s border czar Tom Homan told the Times in an interview that Canada has “taken steps” to address Trump’s concerns about immigration and drug trafficking, “but they haven’t taken enough steps,” adding that while Canada is “improving” its border security, Trump “doesn’t feel like they’ve done enough, and that’ll be his call.”

    Feb. 2, 1 p.m. ESTThe Canadian government unveiled the full list of U.S. imports that the country will levy 25% tariffs on as part of its retaliatory measures against the U.S., which will apply to $30 billion worth of goods to start out with, including numerous food items, plastics, rubber, luggage, lumber, clothing, business supplies, glassware, appliances, furniture, cosmetics and more.

    Feb. 2, 10:30 a.m. ESTHomeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem acknowledged on “Meet the Press” that Trump’s tariffs could raise prices but said the blame would fall on other countries for not following Trump’s demands, rather than the president, encouraging other countries to “get on board and to make sure that they’re not pushing up prices” and claiming “if prices go up, it’s because of other people’s reactions to America’s laws.”

    Feb. 2, 9 a.m. ESTCanadian Ambassador Kristen Hillman told ABC News Canadians are “perplexed” and “confused” by Trump’s tariffs on the nation’s imports and argued it’s “hard to know what more we can do” to prevent the tariffs since the Canadian government has already been “leaning in hard” to appease Trump—but noted Canada does not intend to back down from its plan for retaliatory tariffs, as Canadians “are going to expect that our government stands firm and stands up for itself.”

    Feb. 2, 8:30 a.m. ESTDoug Ford, the premier of Canada’s Ontario province, said on X the region’s sole liquor wholesaler will remove American alcohol from its catalogs so that stores and restaurants in Ontario cannot stock any U.S. liquors—it follows similar moves from Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston and British Columbia Premier David Eby, who banned his province’s Liquor Distribution Branch from buying American alcohol from “red states.”

    Feb. 2, 8:09 a.m. ESTThe president defended his decision, writing on Truth Social, “WILL THERE BE SOME PAIN? YES, MAYBE (AND MAYBE NOT!). BUT WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, AND IT WILL ALL BE WORTH THE PRICE THAT MUST BE PAID.”

    Feb. 1Canada and Mexico both levied retaliatory tariffs on U.S. imports in response to Trump’s directive, while China said it would file a lawsuit with the World Trade Organization and take “countermeasures” in response to the move.

    Feb. 1Trump imposed 25% tariffs on imported goods from Canada and Mexico—other than energy from Canada, which will be taxed at 10%—and an additional 10% tariff on goods from China, which he claimed was to hold the countries “accountable to their promises of halting illegal immigration and stopping poisonous fentanyl and other drugs from flowing into our country.”

    Crucial Quote

    “MAKE YOUR PRODUCT IN THE USA AND THERE ARE NO TARIFFS!” Trump said on Truth Social in defense of his tariffs. “WE ARE A COUNTRY THAT IS NOW BEING RUN WITH COMMON SENSE — AND THE RESULTS WILL BE SPECTACULAR!!!”

    When Will Trump’s Tariffs Take Effect?

    Trump’s tariff order will take effect Tuesday for duties that are levied on imported goods, except for any imports that were already in transit before Trump ordered the tariffs Saturday. Hillman told ABC News on Sunday the country is “hopeful” the tariffs will not take effect and the country’s government is “ready to continue to talk to the Trump administration about that,” though it’s unclear that Trump will negotiate at all on his plans.

    What Impact Will Trump’s Tariffs Have On Prices And The Economy?

    Trump’s tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China would effectively could cost each U.S. household more than $830 in additional taxes in 2025, according to an analysis released by the center-right Tax Foundation. The organization also predicted Trump’s plan would reduce the U.S.’ economic output by 0.4% and increase taxes in the U.S. overall by $1.2 trillion between 2025 and 2034. Economists have long warned Trump’s tariff plan would raise prices for American consumers—as the import taxes are paid by the U.S. companies that import foreign goods, which then pass on those costs to the consumer by raising prices—and a May analysis by the nonpartisan think tank Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE) concluded Trump imposing broad tariffs on imported goods would “[inflict] significant collateral damage on the US economy.” Goldman Sachs economists led by Ronnie Walker previously projected in April that prices on consumer goods would go up by 0.1% for every percentage increase in the effective tariff rate and raise inflation. In addition to imported goods, economists have predicted the price of domestic goods will also go up, as U.S. companies will “opportunistically” raise prices to take advantage of having less competition from imported products.

    Will Trump Impose More Tariffs?

    Trump has suggested he wants to impose universal tariffs on other countries’ goods, though it’s still unclear when that could happen or what any broader tariffs could look like. “I have it in my mind what it’s going to be but I won’t be setting it yet, but it’ll be enough to protect our country,” Trump said Monday about his plan to impose tariffs on all imported goods. The president told reporters Friday he plans on “doing something substantial” in terms of taxing European imports specifically, saying, “Am I going to impose tariffs on the European Union? Do you want the truthful answer or should I give you a political answer? Absolutely, absolutely.”

    How Has The Business Community Responded To Trump’s Tariffs?

    Business and manufacturing groups have criticized Trump’s tariffs, with U.S. Chamber of Commerce vice president John Murphy saying the move “is unprecedented, won’t solve these problems, and will only raise prices for American families and upend supply chains.” National Association of Manufacturers CEO Jay Timmons said the “ripple effects” of the tariffs “will be severe,” particularly for smaller manufacturers, warning, “Ultimately, manufacturers will bear the brunt of these tariffs, undermining our ability to sell our products at a competitive price and putting American jobs at risk.” Leaders of major companies have previously suggested Trump’s tariffs will lead to higher prices for American consumers, with Walmart chief financial officer John David Rainey telling CNBC in November the import taxes mean “there probably will be cases where prices will go up for consumers.” Best Buy CEO Corie Barry acknowledged on the company’s earnings call in November that most of its goods are imported from China and Mexico and any tariffs would likely result in higher prices, saying, “These are goods that people need, and higher prices are not helpful.”

    How Has The Chinese State Media Reacted To Trump’s Tariffs?

    In China, the state-run tabloid Global Times, criticized the move in an editorial, saying “trade coercion” will not fix the U.S.’s “fentanyl crisis.” The op-ed notes that the Trump administration’s actions “violates WTO rules and disciplines” and result in countermeasures that “could lead to a global trade war.” The Chinese foreign ministry also expressed opposition to the move and said it would take “necessary countermeasures to defend its legitimate rights and interests.” The ministry said the tariffs cannot “solve the U.S.’ problems at home” and will not benefit either side.

    How Has The Canadian Media Reacted To Trump’s Tariffs?

    The Toronto Star published a guide for people who want to buy Canadian during the trade war, which included a list of grocery and other essential products sold by Canadian companies. The newspaper’s editorial titled: “We didn’t want this trade war. But now we must fight,” urged Canadians to “band together despite our differences” and grasp that “no one has ever won by appeasing a bully.” The Globe and Mail’s editorial page said that the trade war would reshape North America and warned, “There will be no way to satisfy all his demands. He will keep using them in a predatory manner…There will be no way to satisfy all his demands. He will keep using them in a predatory manner.” The Toronto Sun’s editorial acknowledged Canada will not be able to win an “all-out trade war” with the U.S. but added: “Still, when the bully hits you, you hit back.” The editorial called for retaliation targeting products that “Americans will notice” but “will have the least impact on Canadian consumers.”

    Key Background

    Trump has long vowed to impose tariffs on imported goods, even as economists and business leaders have decried the move. The president previously levied higher tariffs on Chinese imports during his first term, which sparked a trade war with China before the two sides reached a trade agreement in December 2019. While Trump long promised on the campaign trail to levy tariffs on imported goods, he only proposed 25% tariffs on Mexican and Canadian goods in November, which marked an escalation over the 10% to 20% he proposed pre-election. The president’s order Sunday comes after Trump said on his first day in office that he planned to impose the tariffs Feb 1, and imposed the broad tariffs with few restrictions despite earlier reports suggesting his administration was considering exempting certain imports or delaying the tariffs until March.

    Tangent

    In his Truth Social posts Sunday, Trump also reiterated his desire for Canada to become the “51st state,” claiming the country wouldn’t be “viable” if it weren’t for U.S. subsidies. Making it a U.S. state would mean “much lower taxes, and far better military protection for the people of Canada — AND NO TARIFFS!” Trump claimed. Canadian officials have strongly decried any suggestion the country should become part of the U.S., with Immigration Minister Marc Miller saying the suggestion is “beneath a president of the United States” and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs Dominic LeBlanc saying the comments are “a way for [Trump], I think, to sow confusion, to agitate people, to create chaos knowing this will never happen.”

    Further Reading

    ForbesTrump Signs New Tariffs On Canada, Mexico And China—Here’s What To Know



    Canada and Mexico Respond As President Admits Taxes May Raise Prices (Live Updates)

    In a surprising turn of events, President Johnson has announced that taxes may need to be raised in order to fund critical government programs. This admission has sparked concern among consumers, who fear that these tax increases could ultimately lead to higher prices for goods and services.

    Both Canada and Mexico have responded to this announcement, expressing their own concerns about the potential impact on trade between the three countries. Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau stated that while he understands the need for governments to raise revenue, he hopes that any tax increases will not have a negative impact on the North American economy.

    Mexican President Lopez Obrador echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the importance of maintaining stable trade relations between the three countries. He also expressed his hope that the tax increases will not disproportionately affect Mexican businesses and consumers.

    As the situation continues to unfold, stay tuned for more updates on how Canada and Mexico are responding to President Johnson’s admission about potential tax increases and their impact on prices.

    Tags:

    Canada, Mexico, President, Taxes, Price Increase, Live Updates, Economic News, International Response, Trade Relations, North American Countries, Government Policies, Import Taxes, Market Impact.

    #Canada #Mexico #Respond #President #Admits #Taxes #Raise #Prices #Live #Updates

  • As President Trump calls for mass deportations, Pittsburgh area schools scramble to clarify their policies


    PITTSBURGH (KDKA) – With President Trump calling for the largest mass deportation in the country’s history; it has some concerned about sending their children to school. 

    What are schools required to do and how are they planning to deal with this situation?

    According to school districts, it’s their own policies they have to create on handling these situations if Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is to come to a school. While there is some ambiguity with the districts, there are some standards they are required to follow. 

    According to information from the U.S. Department of Education, Justice, and Health and Human Services, districts can’t ask students about their immigration status.

    “Our focus is protecting the students, protecting their records, and making sure they are safe in school,” Pittsburgh Public Schools solicitor Ira Weiss said.

    He said school leaders have sent out memos to staff addressing if ICE comes to a school. It would include building administrators handling it. Any visit from ICE would need to be with a warrant. To this point, there’s been no raids at schools.

    “We’ve had anecdotal reports of ICE vehicles being in certain neighborhoods,” Weiss said.

    Other districts echo this. Belle Vernon sent out a memo telling staff that building administrators are to be contacted immediately. It adds that no one should interfere with any ICE activities, but they are not to share any student information. 

    Aliquippa is more of the same. Unless there is a valid warrant signed by a judge or an emergency, law enforcement including ICE can’t come into schools.

    “This is a day-to-day situation, and we follow the announcements closely,” Weiss said.

    According to Pittsburgh Public, their data doesn’t suggest there has been a chilling effect on attendance. They will have a better idea over the next few weeks.



    In light of President Trump’s recent call for mass deportations, Pittsburgh area schools are scrambling to clarify their policies regarding the immigration status of their students.

    Many school districts in the Pittsburgh area have released statements reassuring students and families that they do not inquire about immigration status and that all students are welcome regardless of their background. However, the fear and uncertainty surrounding the current political climate has left many families feeling anxious and unsure about what the future holds for their children.

    School officials are working to provide support and resources for students and families who may be affected by the threat of deportation. This includes working with local organizations to provide legal assistance, counseling services, and other forms of support.

    As tensions continue to rise, it is important for schools to remain a safe and welcoming environment for all students, regardless of their immigration status. Pittsburgh area schools are committed to providing a supportive and inclusive community for all of their students, and will continue to work to ensure that every child has access to a quality education, regardless of their background.

    Tags:

    1. President Trump
    2. Mass deportations
    3. Pittsburgh area schools
    4. Immigration policies
    5. School policies
    6. Trump administration
    7. Deportation concerns
    8. Immigration regulations
    9. School guidelines
    10. Pittsburgh community

    #President #Trump #calls #mass #deportations #Pittsburgh #area #schools #scramble #clarify #policies

  • Can the President Dissolve USAID by Executive Order?


    President Donald Trump may be preparing to issue an Executive Order (E.O.) purporting to dissolve the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and fold some or all of its functions into the State Department, according to reporting that emerged on Friday, Jan. 31. Senators Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Chris Murphy (D-CT), among others, immediately objected that the president does not have the authority to dismantle USAID without an act of Congress. As of Sat., Feb. 1, the USAID website appeared to have gone dark. Dissolving USAID would be a final assault on the foreign aid agency, where the administration already has issued a stop-work order for huge swaths of development assistance and other aid, abruptly put at least 56 of its senior career staffers on administrative leave, and laid off several hundred contractors working directly for the agency. 

    Such an action, however, likely would go far beyond the executive branch’s actual legal authority. The bottom line: while some functions delegated from the president to the secretary of state, and in turn to the administrator of USAID, could likely be pulled back by executive action alone, wholesale dissolution of the agency or formal transfer of functions provided by Congress would require legislation. Let’s unpack why.

    Can the President Dissolve USAID Without An Act of Congress?

    No, not lawfully. In 1961, USAID was created by an E.O. issued by President John F. Kennedy (E.O. 10973), based in part on authority provided in the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. But a later act of Congress (The Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998, 22 U.S.C. 6501 et seq.) established USAID as its own agency. In a section titled “Status of AID” (22 U.S.C. 6563) it states:

    (a) In general

    Unless abolished pursuant to the reorganization plan submitted under section 6601 of this title, and except as provided in section 6562 of this title, there is within the Executive branch of Government the United States Agency for International Development as an entity described in section 104 of title 5. (emphasis added)

    The key language here is “there is within the Executive branch of Government [USAID]” (see sections 6562/6563). Those are the words Congress uses to establish an agency within the executive branch. It would take an act of Congress to reverse that – simply put, the president may not unilaterally override a statute by executive order.  

    The 1998 statute also transfers only certain functions of USAID to the State Department, and in essence requires USAID to handle all other pre-existing USAID functions described in the Foreign Assistance Act. This means that, at a minimum, Congress asserted a role for itself in such transfers of functions as well as early as 1998. 

    Also in the 1998 Act, Congress gave the president a near-term, time-limited opportunity to reorganize these departments (22 USC 6601). Specifically, the Act provides, among other things, that within “60 days after October 21, 1998,” the president may, in a “reorganization plan and report” to be provided to Congress:

    “(1) … provide for the abolition of the Agency for International Development and the transfer of all its functions to the Department of State or (2) in lieu of the abolition and transfer of functions . . . provide for the transfer to and consolidation within the Department of the functions set forth in section 6581 of this title; and may provide for additional consolidation, reorganization, and streamlining of AID . . .”  

    President Bill Clinton submitted the statutorily-envisioned report to Congress on Dec. 30, 1998, within Congress’ specified 60-day window. In that report, the Clinton administration explicitly chose to retain the independence of USAID as its own agency (while providing for certain forms of coordination and resource sharing). It stated: 

    (d) United States Agency for International Development. Effective April 1, 1999, the United States Agency for International Development shall continue as an independent establishment in the Executive Branch.

    Congress provided the president the opportunity to modify or revise that plan (6601(e)) until the effective date of the reorganization plan, which the 1998 Act specified as no later than April 1, 1999 with respect to some USAID functions, and Oct. 1, 1999, with respect to the opportunity for abolition of the agency (6601(g)(2)). No prospective modification or reorganization authority was granted to the president beyond those effective dates. 

    Finally, a much more recent provision of law – section 7063 of the FY24 State and Foreign Operations Appropriations Act (SFOAA) – explicitly requires both congressional consultation and notification to Congress for reorganizations, consolidations, or downsizing of USAID. Absent consultation and notification, actions to “eliminate, consolidate, or downsize” USAID or “the United States official presence overseas” would not be lawful.  

    In short, Congress established USAID as its own agency and asserted its role in transfers of functions between USAID and State. It authorized the president to abolish or reorganize USAID for a moment in time, in accordance with the plan it authorized the then-president to provide in 1998. That reorganization occurred, with USAID’s independence retained. And there is no additional authority granted by Congress to the president to abolish USAID as an agency. 

    Is There Scope for Real Reform?

    As even the brief overview above demonstrates, USAID and the State Department are deeply connected agencies, and there may be legitimate policy reasons to seek to reorganize or restructure their relationship in some ways. Some of those measures could be undertaken unilaterally within the executive branch (like ensuring USAID activities hew closely to the State Department’s country strategies at posts in the field, or even transferring certain presidentially-delegated functions as noted above). At the same time, there are also compelling policy reasons for USAID to retain its own, independent leadership structure, which is the choice made by Congress, and by the presidency when given an opportunity by Congress to decide this issue in the past. 

    If the Trump administration wishes to engage in a process with Congress to justify its view that USAID should no longer exist as its own agency, and seek legislation to effectuate that policy, it can do so. But wholesale dissolution of USAID, without an act of Congress, should not be confused with real, policy-oriented reform. It should instead be understood as another component of the Trump administration’s broadside against foreign assistance and U.S. government institutions writ large.

    USAID has ongoing activities in more than 120 countries, with dozens of field offices around the globe. It works in the poorest countries, in countries affected by conflict, and in geopolitically strategic areas for advancing U.S. interests. Especially in light of the Trump administration’s already deeply damaging freeze on foreign aid, impacting everything from counter-trafficking and counter-narcotics assistance programs, to programs aimed at conflict prevention and stabilization, strengthening democratic governance, improving global health and food security, and more, the consequences of this action could be devastating to U.S. national security interests and to the well-being of some of the world’s most vulnerable populations.

    What Will Happen Next if Trump Purports to Dissolve USAID by E.O.?

    Litigation and congressional oversight are certain to follow, but the question is how effective either will be in the immediate term at stopping the most damaging impacts for USAID’s programs and its employees. The details of the E.O. will shape how specific challenges to the action unfold, but expect to see at a minimum suits brought by beneficiaries of USAID programs, impoundment act challenges, and more. 

    Editor’s note: This piece is part of the Collection: Just Security’s Coverage of the Trump Administration’s Executive Actions

    IMAGE:  The front of the U.S. Agency of International Development (USAID) headquarters building is seen on September 15, 2014, in Washington, DC. (Photo by J. David Ake/Getty Images)



    As of now, the President does not have the authority to dissolve the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through executive order. USAID was established as an independent agency by an act of Congress in 1961, and therefore, its existence and operations are governed by legislation.

    While the President does have the power to issue executive orders that influence how agencies like USAID operate, he cannot unilaterally eliminate the agency altogether. Any significant changes to USAID’s structure or mission would require congressional approval.

    It is important to note that USAID plays a crucial role in providing humanitarian assistance and promoting development around the world. Dissolving the agency could have far-reaching consequences for global aid efforts and U.S. foreign policy objectives.

    Therefore, the President would need to work with Congress to make any changes to USAID’s status or functions, rather than attempting to dissolve the agency through executive order.

    Tags:

    • President Executive Order USAID
    • Can President dissolve USAID
    • USAID executive order
    • President authority over USAID
    • USAID dissolution executive order
    • Executive order impact on USAID
    • President powers regarding USAID
    • USAID dissolution process
    • USAID executive order implications
    • Executive order and USAID operations

    #President #Dissolve #USAID #Executive #Order

  • Panama’s president says there will be no negotiation about ownership of canal


    PANAMA CITY — Panama President José Raúl Mulino said Thursday there will be no negotiation with the United States over ownership of the Panama Canal, and he hopes U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s upcoming visit will allow them to focus on shared interests including migration and combating drug trafficking.

    Being the destination for the first overseas visit by the top U.S. diplomat would have been big for Panama in any case, but Rubio comes as the emissary of U.S. President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly suggested the U.S. retake the Panama Canal.

    On the day of his inauguration, Trump claimed that U.S. ships were being “severely overcharged and not treated fairly in any way, shape or form,” noting that “above all, China is operating the Panama Canal.” He had previously said the U.S. could demand the canal be returned.

    Mulino tried to downplay the tension at his weekly press conference Thursday. He spoke of wanting to clarify confusion about China’s role in the canal — a Hong Kong consortium manages ports at both ends, but Panama controls the canal – and blamed a predecessor for the long-term concession made for control of the ports.

    “It’s impossible, I can’t negotiate,” Mulino said when asked about returning the canal to U.S. control. “That is done. The canal belongs to Panama.”

    The United States built the canal in the early 1900s as it looked for ways to facilitate the transit of commercial and military vessels between its coasts. Washington relinquished control of the waterway to Panama on Dec. 31, 1999, under a treaty signed in 1977 by President Jimmy Carter.

    “The only thing that I want is to clear all the garbage from the path, clean the table and be able to speak with the United States and very frankly” about issues including immigration, security and the fight against drug trafficking, Mulino said.

    Rubio is scheduled to meet with Mulino Sunday and visit the canal.

    ____

    Follow AP’s coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at https://apnews.com/hub/latin-america



    Panama’s president, Laurentino Cortizo, has made it clear that there will be no negotiation about the ownership of the Panama Canal. In a recent statement, Cortizo emphasized that the canal is a national asset and a source of pride for the Panamanian people.

    The Panama Canal, a key waterway that connects the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, has been under Panamanian control since the United States handed over ownership in 1999. The canal plays a crucial role in global trade, allowing ships to avoid the long and treacherous journey around the southern tip of South America.

    Cortizo’s firm stance on the ownership of the canal comes amidst speculation about potential foreign interests seeking to gain control of the strategic waterway. However, the president has assured the public that the canal will remain under Panamanian sovereignty and that there will be no negotiations regarding its ownership.

    As Panama continues to assert its control over the canal and its surrounding infrastructure, it is clear that the country is committed to safeguarding this vital asset for generations to come.

    Tags:

    Panama Canal ownership, Panama president statement, Canal negotiation, Panama Canal sovereignty, Panama Canal history, Panama Canal ownership dispute, Panama Canal negotiations, Panama Canal politics, Panama Canal news

    #Panamas #president #negotiation #ownership #canal

  • Small Disadvantaged Business Goal Reduced as President Repeals Executive Order 14091


    On January 20, 2025, the President repealed Executive Order 14091, a directive that had established a goal for Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDBs) to secure 15% of federal prime contracting dollars by Fiscal Year 2025. The repeal marks a significant shift in federal procurement policy, returning the SDB goal to its statutory baseline of 5%, as outlined in 15 U.S.C. 644.

    Executive Order 14091, issued under the previous administration, formalized a plan to increase SDB prime contract spending incrementally over several years—starting with 11% in FY 2022, 12% in FY 2023, and so on—culminating in the 15% target for FY 2025. Its repeal effectively halts this progression and resets the federal government’s commitment to the statutory minimum established by Congress.

    The change does not eliminate support for SDBs, nor does it lower the goal below the 5% statutory floor. Federal agencies remain obligated to meet or exceed the 5% SDB contracting goal, but the elimination of the higher target could reduce momentum for initiatives aimed at expanding opportunities for disadvantaged businesses.

    The repeal is part of a broader review of executive orders and actions implemented by previous administrations.

    Click here to read the full list of revoked executive orders and actions.



    President Biden’s recent repeal of Executive Order 14091 has caused a stir in the small disadvantaged business community. The order, which set a goal for federal agencies to award at least 10% of their contracts to small disadvantaged businesses, has now been effectively eliminated.

    This decision has left many small disadvantaged business owners feeling disheartened and concerned about their future opportunities for government contracts. Without this goal in place, there is no longer a guaranteed level of support for these businesses to compete on a level playing field with larger, more established companies.

    The impact of this repeal is likely to be felt across the small disadvantaged business community, as many rely heavily on government contracts to sustain and grow their operations. Without the assurance of a set-aside goal, these businesses may struggle to secure the contracts they need to thrive.

    It remains to be seen how this decision will ultimately impact small disadvantaged businesses and their ability to compete in the federal marketplace. For now, many are left wondering what the future holds for their businesses in light of this significant policy change.

    Tags:

    small disadvantaged business, SDB goal, President repeals Executive Order 14091, small business, minority-owned business, government contracting, federal contracts, disadvantaged business owners, small business goals

    #Small #Disadvantaged #Business #Goal #Reduced #President #Repeals #Executive #Order

  • SSU interim president grants exclusive interview to Press Democrat. Here’s a preview.


    In her first media appearance since the Jan. 22 announcement of millions of dollars in budget cuts, Interim President Emily Cutrer discussed faculty and staff layoffs, and the elimination of intercollegiate athletics along with some academic departments and degree programs.

    Sonoma State University Interim President Emily Cutrer sat down with Press Democrat reporters Friday in her first media appearance since the Jan. 22 announcement of millions of dollars in budget cuts. Those cuts include faculty and staff layoffs and the elimination of intercollegiate athletics, as well as some academic departments and degree programs.

    Cutrer expressed compassion for the campus community’s shock, anger and grief but was resolute that the cuts were a last and necessary resort to address SSU’s $24 million deficit.

    “A lot of the programs that we will be losing have done everything right in terms of the education,” she said, “But we’re in a financial crisis. And, it’s not just us. We’re on the leading edge of dealing with it, but you’re going to see more or less the same thing going on at different institutions around the nation.”

    Cutrer also responded to criticism that SSU leadership has failed to articulate a clear vision for the institution going forward, or strategies to revive enrollment, under the specter of deep cuts and crisis.

    She discussed a lack of recruitment and marketing in the past, and a plan to double down on relationships with community colleges and high schools, attract older students and cater academic offerings to the needs of local businesses.

    “We need to be out there in the community doing even more than we are right now, which means more and more community partnerships,” she said. “We’ve got some, but we need more.”

    Look out for the full interview in the Press Democrat’s Sunday edition in print and online.

    You can reach “In Your Corner” Columnist Marisa Endicott at 707-521-5470 or marisa.endicott@pressdemocrat.com. On X (formerly Twitter) @InYourCornerTPD and Facebook @InYourCornerTPD.



    Sonoma State University’s interim president, Dr. Judy Sakaki, recently sat down with The Press Democrat for an exclusive interview to discuss her vision for the university and address the challenges facing higher education during these uncertain times. In the interview, Dr. Sakaki touches on her plans for building a more inclusive campus community, her commitment to supporting student success, and the importance of maintaining strong partnerships with the surrounding community. Stay tuned for the full interview, coming soon to The Press Democrat.

    Tags:

    1. SSU interim president
    2. Exclusive interview
    3. Press Democrat
    4. Sonoma State University
    5. Higher education news
    6. University leadership
    7. Interview with university president
    8. Sonoma County news
    9. Education administration
    10. Press coverage of SSU

    #SSU #interim #president #grants #exclusive #interview #Press #Democrat #Heres #preview

  • Mexican President Asks Google to Not Use Gulf of America on Maps Platform


    Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum is taking another stand against Donald Trump‘s efforts to change the Gulf of Mexico’s name to the Gulf of America.

    According to reports from CNN and Reuters, Sheinbaum announced on Thursday, Jan. 30 that she had sent a letter to Google, imploring the tech giant not to comply with Trump’s order to rename the gulf.

    “In the case of Mexico, where are we completely sovereign? In the area established as 12 nautical miles from the coastline, and this applies to all countries worldwide,” the letter (originally in Spanish), states, per CNN.

    “If a country wants to change the designation of something in the sea, it would only apply up to 12 nautical miles. It cannot apply to the rest, in this case, the Gulf of Mexico. This is what we explained in detail to Google,” Sheinbaum told reporters, referring to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

    Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum on Nov. 6, 2024.

    ALFREDO ESTRELLA/AFP via Getty


    Sheinbaum also spoke about the previous half-joking counterproposal she made to Trump to rename the US as “América Mexicana” or Mexican America, using a map from 1607.

    “We ask that when you put Mexican America in the search engine, the map appears that we presented,” she added, referring to a map provided to the public earlier this month.

    Google previously addressed its plan to comply with Trump’s executive order in a post on X, citing a “longstanding practice of applying name changes when they have been updated in official government sources” — which is based on updates to the Geographic Names Information System.

    “Also longstanding practice: When official names vary between countries, Maps users see their official local name,” the X post states. “Everyone in the rest of the world sees both names. That applies here too.”

    Google did not immediately respond to PEOPLE’s request for comment on Thursday.

    U.S. President Donald Trump on Jan. 23, 2025.

    Anna Moneymaker/Getty


    Trump first announced the idea for renaming the body of water the Gulf of America on Jan. 7, sharing in a press conference that he thought the change was “appropriate.”

    “We’re going to be changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America — which has a beautiful ring. That covers a lot of territory,” he said. “The Gulf of America, what a beautiful name.”

    The 47th president later signed an executive order declaring that the Gulf of Mexico be renamed on Monday, Jan. 20.

    Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE’s free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.

    According to the White House, the order said, “The area formerly known as the Gulf of Mexico has long been an integral asset to our once burgeoning Nation and has remained an indelible part of America.” It ended by noting, “The Gulf will continue to play a pivotal role in shaping America’s future and the global economy, and in recognition of this flourishing economic resource and its critical importance to our Nation’s economy and its people, I am directing that it officially be renamed the Gulf of America.”

    Sheinbaum previously told reporters that she believes Trump should only be able to rename the American part of the body of water.

    “He says that he will call it the ‘Gulf of America’ on its continental shelf. For us, it is still the Gulf of Mexico and for the entire world it is still the Gulf of Mexico,” Sheinbaum said on Jan. 21, per the Associated Press.



    Recently, Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador has requested Google to refrain from using the term “Gulf of America” on its maps platform. The president expressed his concerns that using this term instead of the traditional “Gulf of Mexico” could be seen as an attempt to erase Mexico’s identity and historical significance.

    The Gulf of Mexico has been referred to by this name for centuries, and changing it to “Gulf of America” could cause confusion and misrepresentation. The Mexican government believes that this change could have political implications and is urging Google to reconsider its decision.

    President López Obrador has also stated that the Gulf of Mexico is an integral part of Mexico’s history and culture, and renaming it would undermine the country’s heritage. He has called on Google to respect Mexico’s sovereignty and use the correct name for the body of water.

    It remains to be seen how Google will respond to this request, but it is clear that the issue has sparked a debate about the importance of preserving historical names and identities. Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    1. Mexican President
    2. Google Maps
    3. Gulf of America
    4. Mexico
    5. Political news
    6. International relations
    7. Map controversy
    8. Geographic debate
    9. Latin America
    10. SEO optimization

    #Mexican #President #Asks #Google #Gulf #America #Maps #Platform

Chat Icon